Skip to main content

Enzymatic synthesis of l-fucose from l-fuculose using a fucose isomerase from Raoultella sp. and the biochemical and structural analyses of the enzyme



l-Fucose is a rare sugar with potential uses in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries. The enzymatic approach using l-fucose isomerase, which interconverts l-fucose and l-fuculose, can be an efficient way of producing l-fucose for industrial applications. Here, we performed biochemical and structural analyses of l-fucose isomerase identified from a novel species of Raoultella (RdFucI).


RdFucI exhibited higher enzymatic activity for l-fuculose than for l-fucose, and the rate for the reverse reaction of converting l-fuculose to l-fucose was higher than that for the forward reaction of converting l-fucose to l-fuculose. In the equilibrium mixture, a much higher proportion of l-fucose (~ ninefold) was achieved at 30 °C and pH 7, indicating that the enzyme-catalyzed reaction favors the formation of l-fucose from l-fuculose. When biochemical analysis was conducted using l-fuculose as the substrate, the optimal conditions for RdFucI activity were determined to be 40 °C and pH 10. However, the equilibrium composition was not affected by reaction temperature in the range of 30 to 50 °C. Furthermore, RdFucI was found to be a metalloenzyme requiring Mn2+ as a cofactor. The comparative crystal structural analysis of RdFucI revealed the distinct conformation of α7–α8 loop of RdFucI. The loop is present at the entry of the substrate binding pocket and may affect the catalytic activity.


RdFucI-catalyzed isomerization favored the reaction from l-fuculose to l-fucose. The biochemical and structural data of RdFucI will be helpful for the better understanding of the molecular mechanism of l-FucIs and the industrial production of l-fucose.


l-Fucose (6-deoxy-l-galactose) is a rare sugar that occurs in a variety of living organisms from bacteria to humans [1]. For example, l-fucose is found in humans in the form of human milk oligosaccharides or glycoproteins, and microbial exopolysaccharides (EPSs) and seaweeds are often composed of l-fucose [2,3,4,5,6]. Due to various bioactive properties, l-fucose has the potential to be used as antiinflammatory, antitumor, and immune-enhancing drugs, as skin-whitening, skin-moisturizing, and anti-aging cosmetic agents, or as nutritional supplements [7,8,9].

For industrial production, l-fucose can be obtained via various routes that include extractive, chemical, and enzymatic methods. First, extraction of l-fucose from fucose-containing sources, such as seaweeds, plants, or animal tissues, has been attempted [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, the process is laborious and costly due to the low content of l-fucose; for seaweed, the yields are often affected by the seasonal variation [2, 6]. Chemical synthesis of l-fucose can be achieved using a common sugar, such as d-galactose or d-mannose, as a raw material. However, this route is still considered impractical since multiple laborious steps are required, which produces low yields and requires high costs [10, 11]. Compared to these methods, enzymatic synthesis of l-fucose is more specific and environmentally friendly, and l-fucose may be produced more efficiently at a lower cost.

To date, two methods of enzymatically producing l-fucose from l-fuculose, the ketose form of l-fucose, have been developed. Although l-fuculose is more expensive and scarce in nature than l-fucose, l-fuculose can be synthesized as an intermediate from readily available resources, such as common sugars [12,13,14]. One approach is based on the reverse reaction for the l-fucose metabolic pathway, in which l-fuculose can be synthesized by an aldolase-catalyzed reaction between lactaldehyde and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP), followed by acid phosphatase-catalyzed dephosphatation [12]. Such an in vitro strategy can be further expanded to microbial fermentation using glucose as carbon source for l-fucose synthesis by constructing a metabolically engineered pathway. The other approach is chemicoenzymatic synthesis that employs d-galactose as the starting material from which l-fucitol is synthesized chemically in two steps, with l-fuculose enzymatically converted from l-fucitol by dehydrogenase [13, 15]. Both methods require l-fucose isomerase (l-FucI) (EC to convert the intermediate l-fuculose to l-fucose. l-FucI is a type of ketol isomerase that catalyzes the interconversion of l-fucose and l-fuculose (Fig. 1) [16,17,18,19].

Fig. 1

A schematic diagram for l-fucose synthesis from l-fuculose mediated by l-fucose isomerase

While l-fucose production using enzymatic methods is an attractive option, only a few l-FucIs (EcFucI from Escherichia coli and KpFucI from Klebsiella pneumoniae) have been examined concerning the equilibrium between l-fucose and l-fuculose. In EcFucI and KpFucI-catalyzed fucose isomerization, the reverse reaction is favored, and l-fucose is predominantly produced from l-fuculose [16, 19]. To increase the industrial applicability of l-FucIs for l-fucose synthesis, more detailed investigations into the equilibrium composition under various conditions and biochemical characterization using l-fuculose as the substrate are needed.

The genus Raoultella comprises gram-negative, aerobic, and non-motile bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, and includes four species, R. electria, R. ornithinolytica, R. planticola, and R. terrigena [20, 21]. The general habitats of these Raoultella species include natural environments, such as soil, water, and plants, but some strains may be present in the intestinal tract [22]. According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, genes associated with l-fucose utilization are commonly distributed among the four aforementioned Raoultella species.

We previously isolated a novel species in the genus Raoultella from abalone intestine (designated Raoultella sp. KDH14) and sequenced its full genome. Analysis and comparison of gene sequences identified an l-FucI from Raoultella sp. KDH14, which was designated as RdFucI. In this study, we examined the conversion and equilibrium between l-fucose and l-fuculose using RdFucI and performed the biochemical characterization and the structural analysis for RdFucI. These will provide information of the fundamental understanding and possible industrial application of RdFucI for the enzymatic synthesis of l-fucose.


Bacterial isolation and RdFucI identification

A colony that outgrew in the medium containing l-fucoidan sourced from Laminaria Japonica (Carbosynth, Compton, Berkshire, UK) as the sole carbon source was isolated from an abalone intestine harvested in South Korea (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Comparison of the sequence identity based on 16S ribosomal RNA against the NCBI database revealed that the isolate was phylogenetically close to the members of the genus Raoultella (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Thus, the isolated strain was identified as Raoultella sp. KDH14. After performing full genome sequencing, RdFucI was identified from Raoultella sp. KDH14 on the basis of gene sequence identity.

RdFucI is composed of 595 amino acids with a molecular mass of 65.5 kDa and an isoelectric point of 5.5. The basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) results indicated the high sequence identity of RdFucI (> 90%) with other l-FucIs from various bacteria belonging to the families Raoultella, Klebsiella, and Citrobacter.

The identified RdFucI was overproduced in E. coli BL21(DE3) with the N-terminal hexa-histidine tag and purified by his-tag affinity chromatography. When analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), the single band appeared around at 65 kDa, consistent with the calculated molecular mass of the monomer subunit.

RdFucI-catalyzed reaction favors l-fucose formation

To examine the isomerase activity of RdFucI, the enzyme reaction was performed with l-fucose or l-fuculose as the substrate (Fig. 2). The enzyme activities for forward (l-fucose to l-fuculose) and reverse (l-fuculose to l-fucose) reactions were determined. Production of l-fuculose from l-fucose was confirmed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis (GC/MS) (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). In the interconversion between l-fucose and l-fuculose, there was no side product observed, meaning that one substrate yields one product (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). Thus, we consider it reasonable to use the calculated amount of l-fuculose concentration by experimentally measuring the amount of l-fucose.

Fig. 2

Enzymatic conversion of a l-fucose to l-fuculose (forward reaction) and b l-fuculose to l-fucose (reverse reaction) by RdFucI. Enzymatic reaction was performed by 3 µg of RdFucI with either a l-fucose or b l-fuculose at 10 mM as the starting substrate at 30 °C for 10 min in 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) in the presence of 1 mM of Mn2+. l-Fucose concentration was experimentally measured and l-fuculose concentration was calculated by subtracting experimentally determined l-fucose concentration from total sugar concentration (10 mM). Experimental data represent means ± standard deviations of three replicates

The reverse reaction was 6.6 times faster than the forward reaction, and the specific activity for l-fuculose (63.9 U/mg) was higher than that for l-fucose (9.6 U/mg). In both reactions, the equilibrium ratio between l-fucose and l-fuculose, which was experimentally determined, was approximately 9:1, thus yielding the equilibrium constant (Keq) of  0.11. The value of Keq was also theoretically determined as 0.23, based on the thermodynamic relation of the standard Gibbs free energy change of reaction and Keq at equilibrium, \(\mathop \Delta \limits_{r} G^{ \circ } = - RT\ln K_{\text{eq}}\), where R and T represent gas constant (8.314 J/mol K) and temperature (K), respectively. \(\mathop \Delta \limits_{r} G^{ \circ }\) represents the standard Gibbs free energy change for the reaction of l-fucose to l-fuculose (0.859993 kcal/mol), which is listed in the database BioCyc ( There was some discrepancy between the experimental and theoretical values of Keq. A Keq < 1 indicates that the reverse reaction is favored. RdFucI-catalyzed isomerization favored the reverse reaction, producing l-fucose from l-fuculose with approximately 90% yield at 30 °C and pH 7.

Effect of temperature and pH on the activity of RdFucI and equilibrium

Enzymatic reactions were performed at various temperatures ranging from 10 to 80 °C and pHs ranging from 4 to 11 using l-fuculose as the substrate (Fig. 3). The isomerization of l-fuculose to l-fucose by RdFucI was highly dependent on temperature, and maximal or near-maximal activities (> 80% of the maximum) were exhibited at temperatures ranging from 30 to 50 °C (Fig. 3a). To investigate the effect of temperature on the equilibrium for l-fucose to l-fuculose isomerization, the equilibrium ratio was investigated at 30, 40, and 50 °C at which maximal or near-maximal activities (> 80% of the maximum) were shown. As a result, there was no significant difference in equilibrium ratio among the three temperatures (l-fucose/l-fuculose = 9:1; p > 0.05). In other words, l-fucose was synthesized from l-fuculose with a yield of approximately 90% at all tested temperatures (Additional file 3: Fig. S3a).

Fig. 3

Effect of a temperature and b pH on the relative activity of RdFucI against l-fuculose. Enzymatic reactions were performed a at various temperatures ranging from 10 to 80 °C and b at various pHs ranging from 4 to 11. The buffers used were 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 4, 5, and 6), 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6, 7, and 8), 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7, 8, and 9), and 50 mM glycine–NaOH (9, 10, and 11). Experimental data represent means ± standard deviations of three replicates

The effect of pH was investigated. High activities of RdFucI (> 70% of the maximum) were observed at alkaline and near neutral pHs (pHs 9, 10, and 11 and pHs 6, 7, and 8). Below pH 6, the enzyme activity decreased sharply, with little activity observed at pH 4. Despite the high specific activities at alkaline conditions, the l-fucose yield at equilibrium (60 min incubation) was much lower at pH 10 (54%) than at pH 7 (88%) (Additional file 3: Fig. S3b). The relative activities at pH 7, 8, and 9 were much lower in Tris–HCl buffer than the activities in sodium acetate or glycine–NaOH buffer, implying that Tris strongly inhibited the enzymatic activity of RdFucI. The preceding enzymatic experiments in this study have been performed in reaction mixtures containing Tris at 1 mM, which was from the buffer change step after enzyme purification. To examine whether Tris in the reaction mixture could inhibit RdFucI, isomerization activities from the reactions occurring in the absence and presence of 1 mM Tris were compared (Additional file 4: Fig. S4). No significant difference was evident in the enzymatic activities from the two reactions, indicating that 1 mM Tris did not inhibit RdFucI activity.

Effect of metal ions on the activity of RdFucI

Sugar isomerases, including l-fucose isomerases, require divalent cations, such as Mn2+ and Co2+, as cofactors for their isomerization activities [14, 23, 24]. To study the effect of divalent cations on the catalytic activity of RdFucI on l-fuculose, the enzyme activity was assayed in the absence and presence of either 1 mM of various metal ions or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Table 1). The native RdFucI enzyme not exposed to metal ions or EDTA displayed low activity, and metal chelation by EDTA reduced the enzyme activity. Among the tested metal ions, Mn2+, Mg2+, Co2+, Cd2+, and Zn2+ resulted in a pronounced increase in the enzyme activity. In particular, the addition of Mn2+ maximally enhanced activity of RdFucI by approximately 7.4-fold. In contrast, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ rather inhibited the activity of RdFucI.

Table 1 Effect of metal ions on the activity of RdFucI

Substrate specificity and kinetic parameters of RdFucI

In general, sugar and sugar phosphate isomerases display a broad specificity toward various substrates [14, 18, 19, 24]. To assess whether ketose-favoring activity of RdFucI shown with l-fuculose was also evident with other substrates, the substrate specificity of RdFucI was investigated against various aldose sugars (l-fucose, d-arabinose, d-altrose, d-galactose, d-mannose, and d-glucose) and their corresponding ketose sugars (l-fuculose, d-ribulose, d-psicose, d-tagatose, and d-fructose) (Fig. 4). Among all these substrates, including aldose and ketose sugars, the highest activities were observed with l-fuculose (115.3 U/mg) and d-ribulose (127.3 U/mg), which are both ketose sugars. The activities of RdFucI for l-fuculose and d-ribulose were much higher than those for the other substrates. Among aldose sugars, the activity for l-fucose was the highest (21.0 U/mg), with the other substrates producing specific activities ranging from 4.7 to 7.9 U/mg. Ketose sugars other than l-fuculose and d-ribulose displayed specific activities from 0.0 to 10.8 U/mg. Thus, l-fuculose and d-ribulose were the preferred substrates for RdFucI and ketose-favoring activity of RdFucI was shown only with l-fuculose and d-ribulose.

Fig. 4

Substrate specificity of RdFucI. Enzyme reactions were performed against 10 mM of various aldose and ketose substrates at 40 °C and pH 10. For aldose substrates, l-fucose, d-arabinose, d-altrose, d-galactose, d-mannose, and d-glucose were used. For ketose substrates, l-fuculose, d-ribulose, d-psicose, d-tagatose, and d-fructose were used. Experimental data represent means ± standard deviations of three replicates

Kinetic parameters were determined using l-fuculose and d-ribulose as the substrates (Additional file 5: Table S1). The values of Km (Michaelis constant) and kcat (turnover number of substrate) for l-fuculose were 1.9- and 1.2-fold lower, respectively, than those for d-ribulose. The catalytic efficiency of RdFucI, represented as kcat/Km, for l-fuculose, was 1.5-fold higher than that of d-ribulose, indicating that l-fuculose is preferred as a substrate of RdFucI.

Overall crystal structure of RdFucI

To better understand the molecular function, we determined the crystal structure of RdFucI (Additional file 6: Table S2). The electron density map of RdFucI was well defined from residues Ser5–Arg591 for six subunits in the asymmetric unit. The monomer RdFucI consists of 19 α-helices and 23 β-strands comprising N1, N2, and C domains (Fig. 5a). The N1 domain (Ser5–Met172) adopts an α/β-fold and is involved in the substrate recognition of the hexameric formation of RdFucI. N2 (Lys173–Leu352) and C (Thr353–Arg591) domains contain the metal binding residues involved in the catalytic activity (Fig. 5a). In the asymmetric unit, RdFucI subunits form the hexameric formation arranged as a dimer of trimers with D3h pseudosymmetry (Fig. 5b). This is consistent with the result from analytical size-exclusion chromatography in which RdFucI was revealed to exist as a homohexamer in solution (Additional file 7: Fig. S5).

Fig. 5

Overall structure of RdFucI. a Cartoon representation of the RdFucI monomer. RdFucI monomer is composed of N1- (yellow), N2- (pink), and C-(green) domains. b Surface representation of the RdFucI hexamer. Subunit A, B, C, D, E, and F are colored by yellow, pink, cyan, purple, green, and orange, respectively. A metal binding site on a substrate binding pocket site is indicated by a red dot

In the hexameric formation, subunit A (total surface area: 23011.7 Å2) interacts with four different subunits B (residues in the interface: 47/buried surface area: 1909.6 Å2), C (58/1837.6 Å2), D (42/1482.9 Å2), and E (34/1086.2 Å2). Subunit A does not interact with the remaining subunit F (Fig. 5b). Subunit A of RdFucI has a total buried surface area of 2569.1 Å2, representing 27.45% of the total surface area. This buried interface is stabilized by interaction involving 59 hydrogen bonds and 26 salt bridges from other subunits (Additional file 8: Table S3, Additional file 9: Table S4, Additional file 10: Table S5, Additional file 11: Table S6).

Substrate binding site and active site of RdFucI

The substrate binding pocket is formed by the N2 and C domains of subunit A and the N1 domain of subunit B (Fig. 6a–c) and has a total of six substrate binding sites in the homohexameric RdFucI. The entrance of the substrate binding pocket, where the substrate approaches, is approximately 11 × 12.5 Å (Fig. 6a). The substrate binding pocket, where the metal binding site is formed, has a negatively charged surface of approximately 4 × 5 Å (Fig. 6b). The distance between the metal binding site and the surface of the substrate binding pocket is approximately 16.7 Å (Fig. 6d), which implies that the active center is located deep in a pocket. This indicates that both the open chain and ring form of the substrate are accessible to the center of the active site and that, conversely, a bulk saccharide would not be accessible to the active site existing in the interior of the substrate binding pocket.

Fig. 6

Substrate binding pocket and active site of RdFucI. a The substrate binding pocket is formed by assembly by subunits A and C. b Electrostatic surface of substrate binding pocket. c B-factor presentation of the substrate binding surface. d Sectional surface view of the substrate biding pocket. e The 2Fo–F electron density map (gray mesh, contoured at 1.0 σ) on the metal binding sites of RdFucI soaked into solution containing the 10 mM Mn2+. f Geometric analysis of the Mn2+ binding sites of RdFucI

RdFucI requires divalent metal ions for its catalytic activity for isomerization reaction using the ene-diol mechanism [23]. The metal binding site of RdFucI should be coordinated with Mn2+ by conserved Glu337, Asp359, and His528 residues (Additional file 12: Fig. S6). However, there is no Fo-Fc electron density map (counted at > 5σ) that is suspected to be bound to Mn2+ as an essential metal for substrate binding (Additional file 13: Fig. S7a). The B-factor analysis revealed that the temperature factor of Mn2+ (70.53 Å2) is higher than the average temperature factor of the protein (36.22 Å2), indicating that Mn2+ is present on RdFucI with a low occupancy. The finding was consistent with the result from the biochemical analysis in which the native enzyme displayed a low level of activity. On the other hand, the addition of Mn2+ substantially increased the catalytic activity of RdFucI (Table 1). Thus, we speculated that the addition of Mn2+ to the RdFucI crystal would increase the binding occupancy of Mn2+. After soaking RdFucI crystals in a solution of 10 mM Mn2+, reliable Fo-Fc electron density (> 6σ) on the metal binding site was observed where the position of Mn2+ was clarified in all subunits (Fig. 6e and Additional file 13: Fig. S7b). However, the temperature B-factor of the Mn2+ (76.56 Å2) was higher than that of the whole protein (60.69 Å2), implying that Mn2+ ion is still not fully occupied in the metal binding site. Mn2+ was coordinated by OE1 (average distance: 2.62 Å) and OE2 (2.65 Å) atoms of Glu337, OD1 (2.72 Å) and OD2 (2.72 Å) atoms of Asp361, NE2 (2.52 Å) atom of His528, and the water molecule (2.79 Å) (Fig. 6e). The average bond angles of Glu337(OE1)–Mn2+–Asp361(OD2), Glu337(OE1)–Mn2+–His528(NE2), and Asp361(OD1)–Mn2+–His528(NE2) were 127.32°, 86.25°, and 73.96°, respectively. The bond angle between ligands and Mn2+ showed a distorted octahedral coordination.

Structural comparison with other l-FucIs

The DALI server was used to search for structural homologs. This search revealed that RdFucI is similar to l-FucIs from E. coli (EcFucI, PDB code 1FUI, Z score: 60.6, rmsd: 0.3 for 587 Cαs atoms), Aeribacillus pallidus (ApFucI, 3A9R, Z score: 56.6, rmsd: 0.7 for 580 Cαs atoms), and Streptococcus pneumonia (SpFucI, 4C20, Z score: 55.9, rmsd: 0.7 for 585 Cαs atoms). Superimposition of the substrate binding pocket showed that the metal binding residues Glu337, Asp361, and His528 (numbered in RdFucI) are positionally identical to the other proteins, whereas substrate recognition residues (Arg16, W88, Gln300, Tyr437, Trp496, and Asn524) have a slight conformational difference in their side chains (Fig. 7a). In particular, the α7–α8 loop of each l-FucI, which lies on the surface of the substrate binding pocket, has a different conformation. Sequence alignment of l-FucIs showed a high similarity, but the sequence for α7–α8 loop of each l-FucI was highly variable (Fig. 7b). Since the α7–α8 loop is involved in forming the architecture of the substrate binding pocket, each l-FucI forms a unique substrate binding pocket (Fig. 7c). l-FucIs commonly have a negatively charged surface around the metal binding site, but the surface of the substrate binding pocket exhibits different charge states (Fig. 7c). As a result, the α7–α8 loop structural differences will cause differences in the substrate specificity of l-FucIs.

Fig. 7

Structural comparison of RdFucI with other l-FucIs. Superimposition of a active site and b substrate binding surface of RdFucI with EcFucI (PDB code: 1FUI), ApFucI (3A9R) and SpFucI (4C20). Close-up view of large conformational difference of α8–α9 loops from l-FucIs (left). c Partial sequence alignment for the α8–α9 loop region for the RdFucI and EcFucI, ApFucI, and SpFucI. d Electrostatic surface representation of RdFucI, EcFucI, ApFucI, and SpFucI. The deep substrate binding pocket and α8–α9 loop regions are indicated by orange- and black-dot lines, respectively. A metal binding site is indicated by a yellow asterisk


Raoultella sp. KDH14 isolated from abalone intestine is a novel species that possesses a gene cluster encoding putative l-fucose transporter (FucT), l-fucose mutarotase (FucU), l-fucose isomerase (FucI), l-fuculokinase (FucK), and l-fucose operon activator (FucR), indicating its potential involvement in l-fucose metabolism. Abalone feeds on brown seaweeds containing fucoidan and is a good source of fucoidan-degrading enzymes, which can degrade the polymeric fucoidan into its monomeric l-fucose [25,26,27]. In this study, Raoultella sp. KDH14 was isolated from an abalone intestine based on its ability to utilize fucoidan from L. japonica, in which the content of l-fucose was 34.1%, indicating that the strain potentially has fucoidan-degrading enzymes to generate l-fucose from fucoidan. This, along with the presence of putative genes for l-fucose metabolism, suggests that Raoultella sp. KDH14 is a good source for the study of l-FucI.

In the reversible reaction catalyzed by ketol isomerases, the strong formation of a certain sugar is not the general case. For example, when sweeteners d-fructose and d-tagatose are commercially produced by d-glucose and l-arabinose isomerases, respectively, a reactant and a product are present in a nearly equal equilibrium ratio (d-glucose/d-fructose = 6:4) [28] and (d-galactose/d-tagatose = 5.4:4.6) [29]. Accordingly, sugar synthesis using isomerase often encounters some difficulties with yield enhancement arising from equilibrium [28, 29]. The identified RdFucI catalyzed the reverse reaction at a faster rate than it did the forward reaction, and equilibrium strongly favored the formation of the aldose l-fucose from the ketose l-fuculose at 30 °C and pH 7, as evidenced by the much higher portion of l-fucose in the reaction mixture at equilibrium (9:1). Therefore, the dominant reaction toward l-fucose that was shown with RdFucI can be advantageous for industrial applications of l-fucose production. The equilibrium ratio between l-fucose and l-fuculose for RdFucI was similar to those for previous EcFucI (8.5:1.5) and KpFucI (9:1) which catalyze the same reaction [16, 19] as the equilibrium is theoretically considered reaction dependent rather than enzyme independent.

In the cases of enzymatic isomerization of d-glucose to d-fructose and that of d-galactose to d-tagatose, the equilibrium is shifted by raising the reaction temperature [28, 30]. However, in this study, the equilibrium ratio between l-fucose and l-fuculose was not significantly altered by varying the temperature in the range of 30 to 50 °C, and thus the final yields of l-fucose from l-fuculose reached approximately 90% regardless of varying temperature. This may be because the tested temperatures were not different enough to shift the equilibrium ratio. Industrial processes often require a high temperature to prevent microbial contamination, to increase sugar solubility, and to minimize the viscosity of the reaction mixture [31]. In this study, both the relative specific activity of RdFucI (reaction rate; 87% of the maximum) and the final yield of l-fucose (90%) still remain high at 50 °C, and were comparable to the enzymatic performance at 30 °C. Thus, RdFucI could be applied for l-fucose synthesis at an elevated temperature, such as 50 °C. The l-fucose yield at equilibrium was much lower at pH 10. The reason could be the degradation of l-fucose and/or l-fuculose during long duration of incubation at the highly alkaline pH, rather than the equilibrium shift by pH [32]. This suggests that a highly alkaline pH condition is not desirable for the industrial production of l-fucose, as its final yield obtained at equilibrium was low regardless of the maximal specific activity.

From the pH profile, Tris was shown to act as an inhibitor of RdFucI. The action of Tris and its analogue as the inhibitor has been already verified with other l-FucIs and sugar isomerases in which Tris inhibited sugar isomerases in non-competitive inhibition mode [28, 33]. Taken together, it is implied that the use of Tris, which is a widely used buffer for enzymatic reactions, should be avoided for the study or application of RdFucI. For example, to avoid such chemical effect of using Tris–HCl buffer and to cover its pH range, the use of a mixture of sodium phosphate and glycine–NaOH could be an alternative. However, in our study, Tris at a concentration as low as 1 mM did not significantly inhibit the enzymatic activity of RdFucI.

The isomerase activity of RdFucI was maximized in the presence of Mn2+, whereas apo RdFucI displayed much lower enzyme activity. The structural analysis of RdFucI showed that apo RdFucI contains Mn2+ with a low occupancy in the active site, whereas the occupancy of Mn2+ in the active site of RdFucI was increased by the addition of Mn2+. The biochemical and structural results indicated that the active site of apo RdFucI is not fully occupied by Mn2+ and, thus, isomerase activity was low. In contrast, the activity of isomerase activity was increased by addition of Mn2+ because the occupancy of Mn2+ was increased in the active site through additional Mn2+, which served as a platform for more substrate binding for isomerase activity. In general, Mn2+ prefers octahedral ligand geometry [34, 35]. Ideal bond angles between metal and ligand are stable at 90°, but acceptable ligand geometry exists between 30 and 120° [34, 35]. In RdFucI, Mn2+ is coordinated by conserved Asp337, Glu361, and His528 residues, where the Mn2+ site has a distorted octahedral geometry of 73.96 to 127.32°. Therefore, the binding affinity of Mn2+ is considered to be low because RdFucI does not stably coordinate the Mn2+ binding sites by the ligands. As a result, the addition of additional Mn2+ may increase the occupancy of this cation in the active site of RdFucI.

l-FucIs reportedly catalyze the isomerization reaction of d-arabinose as well as l-fucose, in which the specific activities for l-fucose and d-arabinose were much higher than those for the other aldose substrates that were tested [16,17,18]. The behavior of FucIs that acts on both l-fucose and d-arabinose is closely related to the fact that l-FucI can be induced by either l-fucose or d-arabinose, and is involved in the metabolism of both l-fucose and d-arabinose [36, 37]. In this study, RdFucI also catalyzed the interconversion of l-fucose and l-fuculose and that of d-arabinose and d-ribulose, although the reverse reaction was markedly favored. Such a strong preference of RdFucI for l-fuculose and d-ribulose may arise from the identical configurations of hydroxyl groups at C3 and C4 positions of the two sugars. d-Arabinose, along with l-fucose, is also a rare sugar but of industrial significance due to its potential utilization as the starting material to synthesize antitumor compounds [38, 39]. Therefore, the dual substrate specificity of RdFucI toward l-fuculose and d-ribulose will be helpful for the coproduction of commercially valuable l-fucose and d-arabinose sugars.

A comparison of the crystal structures of RdFucI and other l-FucIs showed that the metal and substrate binding residues involved in the activity were positionally conserved. This indicates that RdFucI would perform the equal isomerization reaction using the ene-diol mechanism that transfers the position of hydrogens from C2 to C1 and from O2 to O1 using Glu337 and Asp361, respectively, as previously reported with EcFucI [23]. l-FucIs, on the other hand, have an α7–α8 loop at the entrance to the substrate binding pocket, which has a non-conserved sequence and a unique conformation. As a result, each l-FucI has its own pocket depth and width, which is considered to potentially affect its substrate binding and catalytic activity.


We have performed biochemical and structural analyses of RdFucI from the novel species of Raoultella isolated in our laboratory. This is the first study of an l-FucI from the Raoultella genus. The characteristic of RdFucI that catalyzes dominant formation of aldose in interconversion of l-fucose to l-fuculose and that of d-arabinose to d-ribulose will be helpful for understanding of molecular function of l-FucIs as well as bacterial metabolism of l-fucose and d-arabinose. Furthermore, these results will facilitate developing the enzymatic synthesis of l-fucose and d-arabinose for industrial applications.


Gene cloning and expression of RdFucI

The genomic DNA of Raoultella sp. strain KDH14 was used as the template for the amplification of a gene encoding a putative l-FucI (Accession No. MK893986) by polymerase chain reaction. Primers were designed to incorporate the NdeI and EcoRI restriction sites as follows: forward primer, 5′-G GAA TTC CAT ATG AAA AGA ATC AGC TTA CCA AAA ATT-3′ with NdeI site plus overhang (underlined); and a reverse primer, 5′-CG GAA TTC TTA ACG TTT ATA CAG CGG GCC-3′ with EcoRI site plus overhang (underlined). The amplified gene for RdFucI was then ligated into the pET28a vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany).

Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) was used for enzyme expression. An overnight culture of recombinant E. coli (20 ml) was inoculated into LB broth containing 50 µg/ml kanamycin (1000 ml) and cultivated at 37 °C with shaking at 180 rpm. When the cells reached an optical density of 0.6 to 0.8 at 600 nm, the expression of RdFucI was induced by supplementing with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), and the culture was incubated for an additional 16 h at 18 °C.

Purification of RdFucI

The cells harvested by centrifugation were resuspended in a buffer composed of 50 mM Tris–HCl and 200 mM NaCl with 20 mM imidazole (pH 8.0) (Buffer A) and then disrupted by sonication. The cell lysate obtained by centrifugation at 25,188×g and 4 °C for 30 min was applied to a His-Trap column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) equilibrated with Buffer A. The recombinant RdFucI was eluted with a buffer composed of 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) and 200 mM NaCl with 300 mM imidazole (Buffer B). The eluted fractions were concentrated against a buffer containing 10 mM Tris–HCl and 200 mM NaCl using a centrifugal filter unit with a cutoff size of 30 kDa (Millipore, Burlington, MA) at 3500 1240×g at 4 °C. The fractions were then stored in a deep freezer (− 80 °C) until required.

Size-exclusion chromatography

For crystallization and molecular mass analysis of the native RdFucI protein, the concentrated RdFucI was subjected to size-exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with a buffer consisting of 10 mM Tris–HCl and 200 mM NaCl (pH 8.0). The column was calibrated with standard proteins that included thyroglobulin (669 kDa), ferritin (440 kDa), bovine serum albumin (67 kDa), β-lactoglobulin (35 kDa), and ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa).

Enzyme assay

Unless otherwise specified, the enzymatic reaction was performed using 1.5 µg of RdFucI and 10 mM of l-fucose or l-fuculose as the substrate contained in a 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7) or 50 mM glycine–NaOH (pH 10) in the presence of 1 mM MnCl2 in a total volume of 100 µl. The enzyme reaction was terminated by boiling the reaction sample at 95 °C for 10 min. For time-course experiments, only l-fucose was assayed using the K-FUCOSE assay kit (Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Since this enzymatic reaction was conversion between l-fucose and l-fuculose, the amount of l-fuculose was determined by measuring the decreased amount of l-fucose by the enzymatic reaction.

To investigate the effect of temperature and pH, enzymatic reactions were performed at various temperatures ranging from 10 to 80 °C and pH 7.0, and at various pHs ranging from 4 to 11 using four buffer systems at 40 °C: 50 mM sodium acetate for pH 4 to 6, 50 mM sodium phosphate for pH 6 to 8, 50 mM Tris–HCl for pH 7 to 9, and 50 mM glycine–NaOH for pH 9 to 11. To examine the effect of metal ions, the enzyme activity was assayed in the presence of EDTA or various metal ions at 1 mM, including MnCl2, CaCl2 CuCl2, CdCl2, CoCl2, CsCl2, MgCl2, NiCl2, ZnCl2, FeCl3, and LiSO4. One unit (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 µmol of aldose or ketose sugars per min.

Substrate specificity

Various aldose sugars (l-fucose, d-arabinose, d-altrose, d-galactose, d-mannose, and d-glucose) and ketose sugars (l-fuculose, d-ribulose, d-psicose, d-tagatose, and d-fructose) were used for the enzymatic reaction performed at 40 °C for 5 min in which 1.5 µg RdFucI was added to 50 mM glycine–NaOH (pH 10) containing 1 mM MnCl2. The amounts of aldose sugars converted from ketose sugars were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography system equipped with a refractive index detector and an SP0810 column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Filtrated and degassed distilled water was used as the mobile phase, which was applied to the column set at 78 °C with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The amounts of ketose sugars converted from aldose sugars were measured spectrophotometrically [40]. One hundred microliters of 1.5% (w/v) cysteine hydrochloride, 3 ml of 70% (v/v) H2SO4, and 100 µl of 0.12% (w/v) carbazole in absolute ethanol were successively added to the 100 µl reaction mixture, which was then incubated at 35 °C for 10 min. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm, and the amounts of sugars formed were calculated by the calibration curve using each ketose sugar as the standard.

Protein crystallization

The initial crystallization screening of RdFucI (30 mg/ml) was performed with the Index HT, Salt RX HT, and Crystal Screen HT commercially available kits (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA) using the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method at 20 °C. Microcrystals were obtained by precipitation in a solution containing 0.1 M HEPES, pH 7.5, and 20% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 10,000. Suitable crystals for X-ray diffraction were obtained using the diluted RdFucI (15 mg/ml) solution with the crystallization solution using the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method at 20 °C.

X-ray diffraction data collection from protein crystals

Crystals were soaked in a reservoir solution containing an additional 20% (v/v) glycerol, and flash-cooled in a nitrogen stream. X-ray diffraction datasets for the crystals were collected at 100 K on the beamline 11C at PLS-II (Pohang, Republic of Korea) using a Pilatus 6 M or on the beamline 6A using an ADSC Quantum Q270 CCD detector [41]. The diffraction data were processed using the HKL2000 program [42].

Protein crystal structure determination and analysis

The phases were resolved using the molecular replacement method as implemented in MOLREP [43] using the crystal structure of EcFucI (PDB code: 1FUI) [23] as the search model. The structure was manually rebuilt and refined using COOT [44]. The structural refinement was performed using REFMAC5 [45]. The structure quality was validated using MolProbity [46]. The refinement statistics are summarized in Additional file 5: Table S2. The final coordinates and structural factors have been deposited within the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the accession codes 6K1F (RdFucI) and 6K1G (RdFucI soaked with Mn2+).

Interface areas between the subunits were calculated with PDBePISA. The structure-based sequence alignment was carried out using Clustal Omega [47] and ESPRIPT [48]. Structural homolog was searched using the DALI server [49]. Figures of the structure were prepared using PyMOL (

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article and its additional files. DNA sequences and resequencing results are available from GenBank via their accession numbers.



l-Fucose isomerase


National Center for Biotechnology Information


ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid


Protein Data Bank


  1. 1.

    Flowers HM. Chemistry and biochemistry of d- and l-fucose. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1981;39:279–345.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ale MT, Maruyama H, Tamauchi H, Mikkelsen JD, Meyer AS. Fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharides from brown seaweeds inhibit proliferation of melanoma cells and induce apoptosis by activation of caspase-3 in vitro. Mar Drugs. 2011;9:2605–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sutherland IW. Structural studies on colanic acid, the common exopolysaccharide found in the Enterobacteriaceae, by partial acid hydrolysis. Oligosaccharides from colanic acid. Biochem J. 1969;115:935–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Thurl S, Munzert M, Henker J, Boehm G, Müller-Werner B, Jelinek J, Stahl B. Variation of human milk oligosaccharides in relation to milk groups and lactational periods. Br J Nutr. 2010;104:1261–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Becker DJ, Lowe JB. Fucose: biosynthesis and biological function in mammals. Glycobiology. 2003;13:41R–53R.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Deniaud-Bouët E, Hardouin K, Potin P, Kloareg B, Hervé C. A review about brown algal cell walls and fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharides: cell wall context, biomedical properties and key research challenges. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;175:395–408.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Robert C, Robert AM, Robert L. Effect of a preparation containing a fucose-rich polysaccharide on periorbital wrinkles of human voluntaries. Skin Res Technol. 2005;11:47–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Péterszegi G, Fodil-Bourahla I, Robert AM, Robert L. Pharmacological properties of fucose. Applications in age-related modifications of connective tissues. Biomed Pharmacother. 2003;57:240–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Péterszegi G, Isnard N, Robert AM, Robert L. Studies on skin aging. Preparation and properties of fucose-rich oligo- and polysaccharides. Effect on fibroblast proliferation and survival. Biomed Pharmacother. 2003;57:187–94.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gesson J-P, Jacquesy J-C, Mondon M, Petit P. A short synthesis of l-fucose and analogs from d-mannose. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:3637–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dejter-Juszynski M, Flowers HM. Synthesis of l-fucose. Carbohydr Res. 1973;28:144–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wong C-H, Alajarin R, Moris-Varas F, Blanco O, Garcia-Junceda E. Enzymic synthesis of l-fucose and analogs. J Org Chem. 1995;60:7360–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Suzuki S, Watanabe K. Method for producing l-fuculose and method for producing l-fucose. US Patent. 2007. US 2007/0026504 A1.

  14. 14.

    Kwon HJ, Yeom SJ, Park CS, Oh DK. Substrate specificity of a recombinant d-lyxose isomerase from Providencia stuartii for monosaccharides. J Biosci Bioeng. 2010;110:26–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sarbajna S, Das SK, Roy N. A novel synthesis of l-fucose from d-galactose. Carbohydr Res. 1995;270:93–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Green M, Cohen SS. Enzymatic conversion of l-fucose to l-fuculose. J Biol Chem. 1956;219:557–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hong SH, Lim YR, Kim YS, Oh DK. Molecular characterization of a thermostable l-fucose isomerase from Dictyoglomus turgidum that isomerizes l-fucose and d-arabinose. Biochimie. 2012;94:1926–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ju YH, Oh DK. Characterization of a recombinant l-fucose isomerase from Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus that isomerizes l-fucose, d-arabinose, d-altrose, and l-galactose. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32:299–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Menavuvu BT, Poonperm W, Takeda K, Morimoto K, Granstrom TB, Takada G, Izumori K. Novel substrate specificity of d-arabinose isomerase from Klebsiella pneumoniae and its application to production of d-altrose from d-psicose. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006;102:436–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carta A, Rousselier P. Phylogenetic analyses of Klebsiella species delineate Klebsiella and Raoultella gen. nov., with description of Raoultella ornithinolytica comb. nov., Raoultella terrigena comb. nov. and Raoultella planticola comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:925–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ponce-Alonso M, Rodríguez-Rojas L, del Campo R, Cantón R, Morosini MI. Comparison of different methods for identification of species of the genus Raoultella: report of 11 cases of Raoultella causing bacteraemia and literature review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:252–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sękowska A. Raoultella spp.—clinical significance, infections and susceptibility to antibiotics. Folia Microbiol. 2017;62:221–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Seemann JE, Schulz GE. Structure and mechanism of l-fucose isomerase from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1997;273:256–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Leang K, Takada G, Fukai Y, Morimoto K, Granstrom TB, Izumori K. Novel reactions of l-rhamnose isomerase from Pseudomonas stutzeri and its relation with d-xylose isomerase via substrate specificity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1674:68–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thanassi NM, Nakada HI. Enzymic degradation of fucoidan by enzymes from the hepatopancreas of abalone, Haliotus species. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1967;118:172–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tanaka K, Sorai S. Hydrolysis of fucoidan by abalone liver α-l-fucosidase. FEBS Lett. 1970;9:45–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vickers C, Liu F, Abe K, Salama-Alber O, Jenkins M, Springate CMK, Burke JE, Withers SG, Boraston AB. Endo-fucoidan hydrolases from glycoside hydrolase family 107 (GH107) display structural and mechanistic similarities to α-l-fucosidases from GH29. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:18296–308.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bhosale SH, Rao MB, Deshpande VV. Molecular and industrial aspects of glucose isomerase. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:280–300.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nguyen TK, Hong MG, Chang PS, Lee BH, Yoo SH. Biochemical properties of l-arabinose isomerase from Clostridium hylemonae to produce d-tagatose as a functional sweetener. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0196099.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kim BC, Lee Y-H, Lee H-S, Lee D-W, Choe E-A, Pyun Y-R. Cloning, expression and characterization of l-arabinose isomerase from Thermotoga neapolitana: bioconversion of d-galactose to d-tagatose using the enzyme. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;212:121–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Haki GD, Rakshit SK. Developments in industrially important thermostable enzymes: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2003;89:17–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Carraher JM, Fleitman CN, Tessonnier J-P. Kinetic and mechanistic study of glucose isomerization using homogeneous organic brønsted base catalysts in water. ACS Catal. 2015;5:3162–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yamanaka K, Izumori K. d-arabinose (l-fucose) isomerase from Aerobacter aerogenes. Methods Enzymol. 1975;41:462–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zheng H, Chruszcz M, Lasota P, Lebioda L, Minor W. Data mining of metal ion environments present in protein structures. J Inorg Biochem. 2008;102:1765–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bae JE, Hwang KY, Nam KH. Structural analysis of substrate recognition by glucose isomerase in Mn2+ binding mode at M2 site in S. rubiginosus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503:770–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Boulter JR, Gielow WO. Properties of d-arabinose isomerase purified from two strains of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1973;113:687–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    LeBlanc DJ, Mortlock RP. Metabolism of d-arabinose: a new pathway in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1971;106:90–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Moran EJ, Tellew JE, Zhao Z, Armstrong RW. Dehydroamino acid derivatives from d-arabinose and l-serine: synthesis of models for the azinomycin antitumor antibiotics. J Org Chem. 1993;58:7848–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yoshikawa M, Murakami N, Inoue Y, Hatakeyama S, Kitagawa I. A new approach to the synthesis of optically active pseudo-sugar and pseudo-nucleoside-syntheses of pseudo-α;-d-arabinofuranose, (+)-cyclaradine, and (+)-1, pseudo-β;-d-arabinofuranosyluracil from d-arabinose. Chem Pharm Bull. 1993;41:636–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dische Z, Borenfreund E. A new spectrophotometric method for the detection and determination of keto sugars and trioses. J Biol Chem. 1951;192:583–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Park SY, Ha SC, Kim YG. The protein crystallography beamlines at the pohang light source II. Biodesign. 2017;5:30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Vagin A, Teplyakov A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:22–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–32.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Murshudov GN, Skubak P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, Winn MD, Long F, Vagin AA. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67:355–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chen VB, Arendall WB 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:12–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sievers F, Higgins DG. Clustal omega. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2014;48:3131–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Metoz F. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in postscript. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:305–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Holm L, Rosenstrom P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W545–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Experiments were performed using the facilities of the Institute of Biomedical Science and Food Safety at the Food Safety Hall, Korea University.


The present study was supported by the Mid-Career Researcher Program (NRF-2017R1A2B2005628) and the Basic Research Laboratory Program (NRF-2018R1A4A1022589) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF). IJK acknowledges the grant support from the Research Fellow Program through NRF (NRF-2017R1A6A3A11030496).

Author information




IJK designed and performed all the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. DHK carried out the bacterial isolation and identification. KHN performed the protein crystal structural analysis and wrote the manuscript. KHK conceived the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyoung Heon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors agree to the publishing of the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Method. Isolation and Identification of Raoultella sp. KDH14. Fig. S1. Phylogenetic position of Raoultella sp. KDH14 based on the 16S rRNA sequence.

Additional file 2: Fig. S2. TLC and GC/MS analyses for the identification of products synthesized by RdFucI.

Additional file 3: Fig. S3. Effect of temperature and pH on l-fucose yield at equilibrium.

Additional file 4: Fig. S4. Effect of Tris on the enzymatic activity of RdFucI.

Additional file 5: Table S1. Kinetic parameters of RdFucI.

Additional file 6: Table S2. Data collection and refinement statistics for RdFucI.

Additional file 7: Fig. S5. Analytical gel filtration chromatography profile of RdFucI.

Additional file 8: Table S3. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges on the A–B interface of RdFucI.

Additional file 9: Table S4. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges on the A–C interface of RdFucI.

Additional file 10: Table S5. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges on the A–D interface of RdFucI.

Additional file 11: Table S6. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges on the A–E interface of RdFucI.

Additional file 12: Fig. S6. Structure-based sequence alignment of RdFucI, EcFucI, ApFucI, and SpFucI.

Additional file 13: Fig. S7. 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc electron density maps of metal binding site for (a) RdFucI and (b) RdFucI-Mn2+.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, I.J., Kim, D.H., Nam, K.H. et al. Enzymatic synthesis of l-fucose from l-fuculose using a fucose isomerase from Raoultella sp. and the biochemical and structural analyses of the enzyme. Biotechnol Biofuels 12, 282 (2019).

Download citation


  • l-Fucose
  • l-Fuculose
  • l-Fucose isomerase
  • Raoultella