Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification and combinatorial engineering of indole-3-acetic acid synthetic pathways in Paenibacillus polymyxa

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts volume 15, Article number: 81 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Paenibacillus polymyxa is a typical plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR), and synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is one of the reasons for its growth-promoting capacity. The synthetic pathways of IAA in P. polymyxa must be identified and modified.

Results

P. polymyxa SC2 and its spontaneous mutant SC2-M1 could promote plant growth by directly secreting IAA. Through metabonomic and genomic analysis, the genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE in the native IPyA pathway of IAA synthesis in strain SC2-M1 were predicted. A novel strong promoter P04420 was rationally selected, synthetically analyzed, and then evaluated on its ability to express IAA synthetic genes. Co-expression of three genes, patA, ilvB3, and fusE, increased IAA yield by 60% in strain SC2-M1. Furthermore, the heterogeneous gene iaam of the IAM pathway and two heterogeneous IPyA pathways of IAA synthesis were selected to improve the IAA yield of strain SC2-M1. The genes ELJP6_14505, ipdC, and ELJP6_00725 of the entire IPyA pathway from Enterobacter ludwigii JP6 were expressed well by promoter P04420 in strain SC2-M1 and increased IAA yield in the engineered strain SC2-M1 from 13 to 31 μg/mL, which was an increase of 138%.

Conclusions

The results of our study help reveal and enhance the IAA synthesis pathways of P. polymyxa and its future application.

Highlights

  1. 1.

    Verifying an entire native IPyA pathway of IAA synthesis in P. polymyxa.

  2. 2.

    Introducing heterologous IAM and IPyA pathways of IAA synthesis to P. polymyxa.

  3. 3.

    Selecting and analyzing a novel strong promoter P04420 to express IAA synthesis genes.

Background

Many rhizobacteria play growth promotion and biological control functions for plants and are called plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) [1,2,3]. Paenibacillus polymyxa is a typical PGPR that can promote the growth, development, and stress resistance of plants [4,5,6]. P. polymyxa, formerly named Bacillus polymyxa, was reclassified to the genus Paenibacillus by Ash [7]. P. polymyxa is now widely separated from the rhizosphere soil of many plants, including crops such as tomatoes [8], Sudan grass [9], rice [10], cucumber [11], bean [12], sunflower [13], wheat [14], Arabidopsis [15], and Lilium lancifolium [5]. The growth-promoting mechanisms of P. polymyxa are diverse [16]. P. polymyxa can indirectly promote plant growth by improving the induced resistance of plants [17] and providing antagonistic properties to plant pathogens [18]. Furthermore, P. polymyxa can directly promote plant growth by fixing nitrogen [19], dissolving phosphorus [20], dissolving potassium [9], producing siderophores [21], secreting chitinase and volatile gases [22, 23], and enhancing the synthesis of ethylene [24], cytokinins [25], and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [26,27,28].

IAA is the most important type of auxin, regulating plant growth and development [29, 30]. The IAA production in industrial application is now mainly synthesized by chemical method, but generally, numerous bacteria are capable of bioproducing IAA in a range of 10–250 μg/mL with or without 0.2–2 μg/mL of L-tryptophan [31]. IAA produced by PGPR can act in the rhizosphere of plants to directly stimulate root growth [32]. The IAA synthetic pathways of microorganisms are now gradually being analyzed and have mostly focused on a single specific gene of the IAA synthetic pathways [30]. Through functional analysis of genomes, enzymatic activities, observation of metabolic characteristics, and isotope label dilution tests, the IAA synthetic pathways of microorganisms might be divided into L-tryptophan-dependent and L-tryptophan-independent pathways [33, 34]. In bacteria, five potential L-tryptophan-dependent IAA synthetic pathways have been proposed (Fig. 1): the indole-3-pyruvic acid pathway (IPyA), indole-3-acetamide pathway (IAM), indole-3-acetonitrile pathway (IAN), tryptamine pathway (TAM), and tryptophan side-chain oxidase pathway (TSO) [35,36,37].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Five synthetic pathways of IAA depend on L-tryptophan in bacteria

Full size image

For the IPyA pathway of IAA synthesis, L-tryptophan is converted to indole-3-pyruvate by aminotransferase. Subsequently, indole-3-pyruvate is converted to indole-3-acetaldehyde (IAAlD) by indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase (IPDC). Finally, indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase converts IAAlD to IAA [30]. Aminotransferases have been widely discovered in some Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae [38], and have also been reported in Gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 and Arthrobacter pascens ZZ21 [32, 39]. The encoding genes of the key enzyme IPDC have been widely identified and characterized in Azospirillum brasilense, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, E. cloacae, Pseudomonas putida, Zymomonas mobilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, P. polymyxa, etc. [29, 32, 38, 40]. Indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase genes have also been found in some bacteria, such as E. coli, Pseudomonas syringae, A. brasilense, A. pascens, and B. amyloliquefaciens [30, 34, 36, 37, 39]. The IAM pathway of IAA synthesis is the best-characterized pathway in bacteria which mainly exists in Pseudomonas savastanoi and A. tumefaciens [41,42,43]. The main genes driving the IAM pathway are iaam and iaah, which encode tryptophan monooxygenase and indole-3-acetamide hydrolase, respectively [44, 45]. Tryptophan monooxygenase catalyzes the conversion of L-tryptophan to indole-3-acetamide (IAM), and indole-3-acetamide hydrolase further catalyzes the hydrolysis of IAM to IAA [46]. The iaam and iaah genes were already found in P. savastanoi [47], A. tumefaciens [43], Burkholderia pyrrocinia [48], Pseudomonas fluorescens [39, 48], and some other strains. In regard to the IAN pathway of IAA synthesis, the biosynthesis genes have not been well characterized, and they might have two different pathways. For the first pathway of IAN, some studies have discovered that L-tryptophan can be directly converted to indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN) [49], and IAN can be further converted into IAA by the two-step enzymatic hydrolysis of nitrile hydratase and indole-3-acetamide hydrolase [50]. The reaction process involves nitrile hydratase catalyzing the conversion of IAN to IAM, and then indole-3-acetamide hydrolase hydrolyzing IAM into IAA [51]. For the second pathway of the IAN pathway, some studies have speculated that L-tryptophan can be converted to indole-3-acetaldoxime (IAOx), then IAOx is converted to IAN, and IAN is finally hydrolyzed into IAA by nitrilase [51]. To date, the enzymes responsible for the conversion of L-tryptophan to IAOx and the conversion of IAOx to IAN have been detected in bacteria [52]. Nitrilase was found in E. coli [53], Rhodococcus ruber [53], P. fluorescens [54], B. amyloliquefaciens [32], and other bacteria. In bacteria, the IAM and IAN pathways share the same indole-3-acetamide hydrolase to convert IAM into IAA. Nitrilase has not yet been detected in some strains of Agrobacterium and Rhizobium spp. [49], but these strains somehow have nitrilase activity. The TAM pathway of IAA synthesis has been suggested in B. cereus and Azospirillum by the identification of tryptophan decarboxylase activity [32, 55]. In this way, L-tryptophan is converted to tryptamine (TAM) by tryptophan decarboxylase and then converted to IAA by amine oxidase. The TSO pathway of IAA synthesis is a unique pathway that may only exist in P. fluorescens [56]. L-Tryptophan is converted to IAAlD under the catalysis of tryptophan side-chain oxidase [57] and then converted to IAA under the catalysis of indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase [51].

The IAA production and related genes of some Gram-negative bacteria have been widely studied; in contrast, the details of biosynthetic pathways utilized by Gram-positive bacteria remain less clear, and further research and exploration are still needed [37, 39]. As a Gram-positive PGPR, P. polymyxa can synthesize IAA to promote cell growth, division, and differentiation, and regulate the physiological functions of plants [37, 40, 58]. Some genes involved in the IAA synthetic pathways of P. polymyxa were analyzed as mentioned above, which were mainly focused on the IPDC encoding gene of the IPyA pathway. However, the other genes of the IAA synthetic pathways need further verification. In addition, auxin efflux carrier (AEC) proteins for IAA efflux were found and are widely present in the genome of P. polymyxa [28]. It has also been verified that a mutation in the gpr1 gene could reduce the ability of P. polymyxa to synthesize IAA; however, mutations in the relA/spoT homologous gene and downstream of the spo0F gene could somehow increase the yield of IAA [59]. However, to date, the entire metabolic pathways and regulatory mechanisms of IAA synthesis in P. polymyxa have not been clearly identified, and the improvement of IAA production in P. polymyxa is of great value.

The genetic modification of P. polymyxa is beneficial for the characterization of its IAA synthetic pathways and the improvement of its application. The predictable control of gene expression is a main approach for genetic manipulation in P. polymyxa [60]. Promoters initiate the transcription process and play important roles in controlling gene expression [61, 62], which is an important strategy for metabolic engineering and synthetic biology research [63]. Previously, four heterogeneous promoters were tested for genetic expression in P. polymyxa [64]. Heinze et al. [65] evaluated 11 promoter sequences, which included well-characterized promoters from Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus megaterium, for the secretory production of a cellulase in P. polymyxa DSM292. Through high-throughput random screening, the native and continuously expressed promoter PLH-77 was also identified and characterized by our group [60]. The promoters described above are useful for heterologous expression in the host P. polymyxa. However, a series of powerful promoters with different activities have not yet been established in P. polymyxa for IAA production research. For predictable expression control of IAA synthetic genes in P. polymyxa, there is still no quantitative and strong gene expression system conducted by novel promoters with different expression intensities.

P. polymyxa SC2 was formerly isolated from rhizosphere soil of pepper and tested as an effective PGPR for increasing plant growth and having broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity by our group [66, 67], which can be used to produce microbial fertilizers. P. polymyxa SC2-M1 is a spontaneous mutant of strain SC2 with a high transformation capacity [68] and is an ideal material for molecular biology research on P. polymyxa. In this study, we identified that strain SC2-M1 retained the ability to synthesize IAA. A native IAA synthetic pathway of strain SC2-M1 was discovered, and the IAA yield was then enhanced through different metabolic pathways benefiting from a novel strong promoter, P04420.

Results

Identification of the IAA synthetic ability of P. polymyxa SC2-M1

In the presence of inorganic acid, IAA can interact with FeCl3 to have color reaction and form a red chelate, which has a maximum absorption peak at 530 nm. Strain SC2-M1 was cultured in Landy medium both with and without L-tryptophan. The strains cultured without L-tryptophan had no color reaction, but the strains cultured with L-tryptophan had obvious color changes, indicating that strain SC2-M1 can produce IAA with L-tryptophan. The standard curve of IAA was measured as Y (IAA, μg/mL) = 30.439 × X (OD530) + 0.3165 (R2 = 0.9992). Therefore, when 3 mM L-tryptophan was added to the medium, the IAA yield of strain SC2-M1 was 12.5 μg/mL (Fig. 2A). Therefore, there is at least one IAA biosynthesis pathway that depends on L-tryptophan in the genome of strain SC2-M1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The IAA yield (A) and the growth curve (B) of P. polymyxa SC2-M1. Strain SC2-M1 was activated and inoculated by 5% in Landy medium with or without 3 mM L-tryptophan for 72 h at 25 °C. The concentration of IAA was measured by colorimetric method. The test group (named as M1-T) was cultured with 3 mM L-tryptophan compared with the control group (named as M1) without L-tryptophan. Compared with the control, data that significantly increased (p < 0.05) were marked with *

Full size image

Metabolome analysis of strain SC2-M1 for discovering IAA biosynthesis pathways

Selection of sampling time

The growth ability of strain SC2-M1 in Landy medium with or without L-tryptophan and the changes in IAA yield were tested. Strain SC2-M1 could accumulate IAA after 9 h of incubation, and at this time, strain SC2-M1 was in the logarithmic phase, which was suitable for sampling (Fig. 2B). Combining the growth status and IAA production of strain SC2-M1, the strain cells incubated for 9 h were selected and prepared for metabolome analysis.

Screening of differential metabolites

Metabonomic analysis was performed on the test group containing 3 mM L-tryptophan (M1T) compared with the control group without 3 mM L-tryptophan (M1). The criteria of fold-change ≥ 1.2 or ≤ 0.83 and p value < 0.05 were used to screen the differential metabolites. After data preprocessing, the total number of compounds and the number of differential metabolites were statistically analyzed according to the positive and negative ion modes, as shown in the volcano diagram in Fig. 3. In the positive ion mode (Fig. 3A), a total of 2224 differential metabolites were identified, of which 1286 metabolites were upregulated, 938 metabolites were downregulated, and 998 metabolites had known specific functions. In the negative ion mode (Fig. 3B), a total of 485 differential compounds were identified, of which 280 metabolites were upregulated, 205 metabolites were downregulated, and 227 metabolites had known specific functions. The differential metabolites that were identified were mainly enriched in the positive ion mode, and there were far more upregulated metabolites than downregulated metabolites.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Volcano maps of differential metabolites in P. polymyxa SC2-M1. Differential metabolites in positive (A) and negative (B) ion mode. Green points represent the downregulated metabolites. Red points represent the upregulated metabolites. The non-different metabolites are marked as purple-grey points

Full size image

Cluster and enrichment analysis of differential metabolites

To understand the classification and functional characteristics of the different metabolites for the test Group M1T vs. the control Group M1, GO annotation and KEGG functional analysis were performed on the identified metabolites. The results demonstrated that most of the differential metabolites were primarily concentrated in the biochemical metabolic pathways and signal transduction pathways. Among them, 166 metabolites were enriched in positive ion mode, and 62 metabolites were enriched in negative ion mode. The cluster analysis of the metabolites in these samples is shown in Fig. 4. In the positive ion mode (Fig. 4A) and negative ion mode (Fig. 4B), the overall Euclidean distances among the 4 parallel samples of the control group or the 4 parallel samples of the test group are very small, which indicates that the parallelism among the 4 parallel samples in the two groups is good. The results of our analysis are based on the synthesis of the 4 parallel samples in the two groups. The same metabolite can show different enrichment effects under different ion modes. Combined with the analysis of positive and negative ion models, there is a certain overlap for a certain metabolite in the control group or test group, indicating that the metabolic pathways involved in this metabolite are significantly enriched.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Classification and analysis of differential metabolites in P. polymyxa SC2-M1. Cluster analysis of differential metabolites in the positive (A) and negative (B) ion mode. Each row represents a differential metabolite and each column represents a sample. The color represents the expression level of differential metabolites, and the green to red corresponds to the expression level from low to high. Bubble chart of metabolic pathway enrichment analysis in the positive (C) and negative (D) ion mode. Red represents the significant enrichment and the size of the dot represents the number of different metabolites annotated in the pathway

Full size image

Under the condition of p value < 0.05, the KEGG database was employed to combine the metabolic pathway enrichment analysis in a bubble chart to screen the metabolic pathways with significant enrichment of differential metabolites (Fig. 4C and D, and Additional file 1: Table S2). In the positive ion mode (Fig. 4C), differential metabolites were enriched in 18 metabolic pathways, of which 17 counts were enriched in tryptophan metabolic pathways, 22 counts were enriched in microbial metabolism in diverse environments, 22 counts were enriched in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, 9 counts were enriched in degradation of aromatic compounds, and 8 counts were enriched in tyrosine metabolism and other metabolic pathways. In the negative ion mode (Fig. 4D), differential metabolites were enriched in 15 metabolic pathways, of which 11 counts were enriched in the tryptophan metabolic pathways, 5 counts were enriched in the biosynthesis of amino acids, and a few counts were enriched in the biosynthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, tyrosine metabolism, the ABC transporter, etc. Comprehensive analysis of the enriched metabolites in both positive and negative ion modes showed that differential metabolites in tryptophan metabolic pathways were significantly enriched in more than 10 counts in the two modes. The differential metabolites in tryptophan metabolic pathways are closely related to IAA biosynthesis.

Analysis of metabolites involved in L-tryptophan metabolism pathways

The different metabolites related to the IAA biosynthetic pathways were screened and the related genes were revealed in strain SC2-M1. Through KEGG analysis, it was found that the intermediate metabolites (Group M1T vs. Group M1) in the tryptophan metabolic pathways related to the IAA biosynthesis process were increased, such as indole, tryptamine, indole-3-lactic acid, indole pyruvate, indole-3-ethanol, indole-3-acetamide, and IAA. The results proved that strain SC2-M1 has IAA biosynthetic pathways depending on L-tryptophan, which can be further explored.

Screening of genes likely to be involved in the IAA biosynthetic pathways of P. polymyxa SC2-M1

Screening of genes likely to be involved in the IAA biosynthetic pathways of P. polymyxa SC2-M1 was done by combining the metabolome results and genome annotation information. Based on the proposed IAA biosynthetic pathways that depend on L-tryptophan in bacteria [46, 69], the entire P. polymyxa SC2-M1 genome was mined for genes involved in each step of different IAA biosynthetic pathways (Table 1). The candidate genes were screened according to their deduced amino acid sequences with enzymes that were already known in IAA metabolic pathways. In regard to the discovery of the IPyA pathway, the genes patA, alaT1, and ykrV1 may encode aminotransferase; the genes ilvB3, poxB, pdhA, and pdhB may be involved in the indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase reaction; and the final step is the conversion of indole-3-acetaldehyde to IAA catalyzed by indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, which may be encoded by the fusE and adhE genes. In regard to the discovery of the TAM pathway, the genes coding for tryptophan decarboxylase were not detected in strain SC2-M1. However, the gene sdr2 encoding amine oxidase in the second step of the TAM pathway was discovered. In regard to the most common IAM pathway in bacteria, the iaam gene encoding tryptophan monooxygenase was not detected in the genome of strain SC2-M1, but the genes gatA1, gat and yhaA1, which hold high homology with the indole-3-acetamide hydrolase coding gene iaah, exist in the genome of strain SC2-M1. In regard to the possible IAN pathway, the PPSC2_05390 gene encoding nitrile hydratase and the nit2 gene encoding nitrilase were found in the genome of strain SC2-M1, but the related activities need to be tested. The genes encoding indole-3-acetamide hydrolase in the IAN pathway are the same as those in the IAM pathway.

Table 1 The predicted native IAA synthetic pathways of P. polymyxa SC2-M1
Full size table

Since all of the candidate genes (Table 1) were potentially involved in L-tryptophan-dependent IAA biosynthesis of strain SC2-M1, the active genes were further identified via transcriptional responses by the addition of L-tryptophan. When 3 mM L-tryptophan was added to the medium, six of the candidate genes were found to be significantly induced by L-tryptophan (Fig. 5A): the mRNA relative expression of the genes gatA1, patA, ilvB3, fusE, sdr2, and nit2 was increased by 38%, 62%, 138%, 69%, 61%, and 84%, respectively. These six genes were proposed to be involved in the tryptophan-dependent IPyA, TAM, IAN, and an uncharacterized IAA biosynthesis pathway. This finding indicates that multiple IAA biosynthesis pathways exist in P. polymyxa SC2-M1, and a set of the entire genes in the IPyA pathway were all identified.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Relative expression levels of genes induced by L-tryptophan and the IAA yield of modified strain SC2-M1. Relative expression levels of genes gatA1, patA, ilvB3, fusE, sdr2, and nit2 in the logarithmic phase of strain SC2-M1 in the test group (named as M1-T) that was cultured with 3 mM L-tryptophan compared with the control group (named as M1) without L-tryptophan (A). The IAA yield of strain SC2-M1 overexpressing genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE (B). The IAA yields were tested by the colorimetric method and adding 3 mM L-tryptophan in Landy medium for 72 h at 25 °C. SC2-M1-P is the control strain containing empty plasmid pHY300PLK, Strains M1-patA, M1-ilvB, and M1-fusE represent genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE overexpressing strains, respectively. Strain M1-C1 represents patA-ilvB3-fusE co-expressing strain. Compared with the control, data that significantly increased (p < 0.05) were marked with *

Full size image

Screening and identification of endogenous and high-efficiency promoters for expressing and verifying genes involved in the IAA synthetic pathways

Rational identification of native promoters resulting from transcriptome data in strain SC2-M1

The availability of endogenous promoters with different transcription levels in P. polymyxa to control gene expression is still necessary. Moreover, the basic structures of the endogenous promoters of P. polymyxa have not been revealed. Due to the former transcriptome data of strain SC2-M1 [68] on LB media, we selected 77 potential promoters of expressed genes with high average values of RPKM values (reads per kilobase of transcript per million reads mapped) to analyze the basic structures of endogenous promoters of strain SC2-M1. The − 35 and − 10 regions of these promoters were predicted by Softberry-BPROM. Then, the − 35, − 10, and RBS regions, and their flanking sequences of these promoters were analyzed using the WEBLOGO website (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The spacer bases between − 35 and − 10 regions were filled with “–” when less than 22 nt. For the promoter sequences of the 77 highly transcribed genes of strain SC2-M1 under normal growth conditions on LB medium, the conserved bases of the − 35 and − 10 regions were “TTG(A/C)NN” and “TA(T/A)AAT”, respectively. The resulting − 10 and − 35 regions were close to the consensus recognition sequences of bacteria reported [70, 71]. The conserved bases of the RBS region were purine-rich bases “G/A” from the 9th base to the 14th base before the start codon. Analyzing the conservative bases of the promoter sequences is beneficial for understanding the favorable regions of native promoters in strain SC2-M1 and this might be easier or consumes less energy to express genes.

The promoter data of 25 genes arranged in descending order according to the average RPKM value are shown in Additional file 1: Table S3. We selected the promoters corresponding to these genes to study their expression activity. Among these 25 genes, 7 genes were distributed to three groups with polycistronic relationships. Thus, based on the transcriptome data of strain SC2, a total of 21 promoters were selected. In addition, the promoter Pspo0A of the sporulation transcription factor Spo0A was also rationally selected, so we rationally selected out 22 promoters. The selected 22 promoters were then verified in P. polymyxa SC2-M1. A constitutive promoter Pgap in Paenibacillus [64] and a promoter PLH-77 that was formerly reported by our group [60] were selected as positive controls in this study. Compared with the negative control, there were seven strong promoters in P. polymyxa SC2-M1, and the order of promoter activities from high to low was P04420 > Pspo0A > P22955 > P25430 > P15240 > P09115 > P00160 (Fig. 6A). The strength of the six promoters was higher than that of PLH-77 [60], and the activities of promoters P00160 and PLH-77 were similar. The microscopic fluorescence observation of GFP expressed by the six promoters P15240, P22955, P04420, P09115, P25430, and Pspo0A in strain SC2-M1 is also presented in Additional file 1: Fig. S2, and these six endogenous strong promoters were selected for further research.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Analysis of promoter strength in P. polymyxa SC2-M1 or E. coli DH5α. Relative fluorescence intensities of different promoters expressing GFP in P. polymyxa SC2-M1 (A). Relative fluorescence intensities of endogenous strong promoters expressing GFP in P. polymyxa SC2-M1 under different pH (B) and temperature (C). Relative fluorescence intensities of engineered P04420 expressing GFP in E. coli DH5α (D) and strain SC2-M1 (E). Single colonies of fresh strains were preincubated on LB liquid medium, and then transferred to fresh media to a final concentration of 10% for 24 h incubation. Control contains no promoter for GFP expression. Compared with the control, data that significantly increased (p < 0.05) were marked with *

Full size image

In addition, as B. subtilis 168 is a Gram-positive model organism, the selected promoters with high strength were also expressed in B. subtilis 168 to verify their general applicability in Gram-positive bacteria. Compared with the control, promoters P04420, Pspo0A, P22955, P15240, and P09115 also worked well in B. subtilis 168 (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). We also tested the relative fluorescence intensities of different promoters expressing GFP in Gram-negative E. coli DH5α, and the activities of these promoters showed a different trend in the Gram-negative background (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). It is worth noting that P04420 was the strongest in E. coli, similar to strain SC2-M1.

Effects of different pH values and temperatures on the expression of endogenous strong promoters in strain SC2-M1

We set different pH and temperature conditions to identify the expression stability of the six promoters P04420, Pspo0A, P22955, P25430, P15240, and P09115. The constitutive promoter Pgap was used as a positive control. The pH value of the LB media was adjusted to 6, 7, and 8 using HCl or NaOH solutions. As shown in Fig. 6B, the activities of Pgap did not change with pH value. However, when strain SC2-M1 was in an acidic or alkaline environment, the expression activity of these endogenous strong promoters also changed accordingly. The expression activity of P25430 decreased with increasing pH and was suitable for gene expression under acidic conditions. The expression activities of the remaining promoters were more suitable for neutral conditions (pH = 7). The average expression activity of P04420 was the highest across the three pH conditions. To determine the expression stability of the six endogenous strong promoters in different temperature environments, strain SC2-M1 was grown at 28 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C. As shown in Fig. 6C, Pgap did not change with temperature. The expression activities of the promoters at 28 °C were all lower than those at 37 °C. Moreover, the expression activities of P15240, P25430, and Pspo0A at 42 °C were better than those at 37 °C. In contrast, the expression activities of P22955, P04420, and P09115 were better at 37 °C. The average expression activity of P04420 was the highest across the three temperatures.

Sequence modification and activity characterization of promoter P 04420

Through the above experiments, several endogenous strong promoters in strain SC2-M1 were determined and the expression activity of P04420 was found to be relatively ideal, so P04420 was selected to artificially modify the activity of the promoter. First, the upstream element sequence, core promoter region, downstream element sequence, − 35, − 10, and RBS regions of P04420 were predicted. According to the characteristics of sequences in prokaryotic promoters, we used the idea of synthetic biology to design and modify the different sequence regions in P04420 by deleting, adding, or replacing bases in the promoter sequence. A total of 10 modified promoters of P04420 were obtained: P04420-1, P04420-2, P04420-3, P04420-4, P04420-5, P04420-6, P04420-7, P04420-8, P04420-9, and Pn-04420. A schematic diagram of the design of the P04420 sequence is shown in Fig. 7. The arrangement of the original sequence of P04420 and the characteristics of the modified promoter sequence are shown in Additional file 1: Table S4. P04420-1 represents the sequence in which the upstream element sequence of P04420 is truncated by half; P04420-2 represents the sequence of P04420 with the upstream element removed completely; P04420-3 represents the sequence of the -35 and -10 regions of P04420 that were mutated into the sequences of TTGACA and TATAAT, respectively; P04420-4 represents the sequence with four bases of TATG added between the − 35 and − 10 regions of P04420; P04420-5 represents the sequence of P04420 with the downstream sequence truncated; P04420-6 represents the RBS sequence of P04420 that was mutated to the sequence TAAGGAGG; the 8 bases between the RBS sequence of P04420 and the BamH I restriction site were replaced with the sequence AAAAAAAA to obtain P04420-7; the 8 bases between the RBS sequence of P04420 and the BamH I site were replaced with the sequence TGA to obtain P04420-8; the sequence of P04420-9 represents the P04420 sequence with the 8 bases between the RBS sequence and the BamH I sequence deleted; Pn-04420 is the sequence of P04420 with the BamH I restriction site removed between RBS and ORF.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Sequence diagram of ten derivatives of promoter P04420. The changed sequences were indicated in the corresponding sites

Full size image

The expression activities of each modified promoter of P04420 in E. coli (Fig. 6D) and strain SC2-M1 (Fig. 6E) were both determined at pH = 7 and 37 °C. The expression activities of these promoters in strain SC2-M1 were ranked as follows: P04420 > Pn-04420 > P04420-8 > P04420-2 > P04420-3 > P04420-4 > P04420-1 > P04420-6 > P04420-7 > P04420-9 > P04420-5. The expression activities of the ten modified promoters all showed different degrees of downregulation compared with P04420. The modified promoter P04420-5 was almost inactive. According to the different expression activities of all modified promoters and P04420 in strain SC2-M1, the influence of these modified regions on the promoter activity could be observed. The changes in the upstream sequence of P04420 (P04420-1, P04420-2, P04420-3, and P04420-4) attenuated the promoter activity. The changes in the downstream sequence of P04420 (P04420-5, P04420-6, P04420-7, P04420-8, P04420-9, and Pn-04420) also attenuated promoter activities, and the degree of influence was greater than that of upstream sequence. To further explore whether the expression activities of the modified promoters in strain SC2-M1 were consistent with those in E. coli, we transformed the 10 modified promoters into E. coli DH5α; however, their activities in E. coli were inconsistent with those in strain SC2-M1. In E. coli, the expression activities of these promoters in descending order were Pn-04420 > P04420-8 > P04420-5 > P04420-2 > P04420 > P04420-3 > P04420-9 > P04420-4 > P04420-1 > P04420-7 > P04420-6. There were 4 modified promoters whose expression activity was upregulated. The most active promoter, Pn-04420 was approximately 4 times higher than that of P04420; there were 6 downregulated promoters. The modified promoter P04420-6 had the lowest activity, which showed that RBS was the key region of promoter P04420 for expressing genes in E. coli.

The application of different derivatives of P 04420 to express α-amylase

α-Amylase is an important industrial enzyme that is mainly cloned from microorganisms. Through the above experiments, we obtained several promoters with different activities. The corresponding relationship between promoter expression activity and enzyme activity was verified by further expressing α-amylase derived from strain SC2-M1. In this part, we selected 5 modified promoters of P04420 with different activities (P04420-4, P04420-6, P04420-8, P04420-9, and P04420) to drive the overexpression and expression of the α-amylase gene in strain SC2-M1 and E. coli DH5α, respectively. The α-amylase activity expressed by each promoter in different hosts was observed by transparent circle experiments. The recombinant bacteria fused with the empty plasmid pHY300PLK were used as the negative control (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). In strain SC2-M1, the α-amylase expression activities of the 5 modified promoters in descending order were P04420 > P04420-8 > P04420-4 > P04420-6 > P04420-9. When expressing extracellular α-amylase, the transparent circle radiuses of the P04420, P04420-8, and P04420-4 expressing strains were similar; P04420-6 had weaker activity; and P04420-9 had no activity, as its clear circle was smaller than that of the negative control. Although the activities of the promoters P04420 and P04420-8 were higher than those of P04420-4, the activities of the expressed extracellular α-amylase were similar. The promoter activity of P04420-4 was high enough to express extracellular α-amylase in strain SC2-M1. Similarly, the above five promoters could also express extracellular α-amylase in E. coli and promoter P04420-6 had the lowest α-amylase activity (Additional file 1: Fig. S4).

Taken with the above results, when a promoter reaches a certain strength, the enzyme activity expressed reaches a peak value, which might be due to the cell restriction of a limitation of endogenous substances in cells and the cellular homeostasis. It was also shown that the recombinant strain caused certain metabolic pressure for heterologous expression or overexpression of α-amylase, so it was necessary to select a promoter with suitable activity. The endogenous α-amylase gene was successfully expressed and exhibited biological activities in strain P. polymyxa SC2-M1 using promoter P04420. It was confirmed that promoter P04420 and its derivatives could be utilized to perform gene expression of IAA synthesis in P. polymyxa.

Verification of the endogenous IAA synthetic pathways of P. polymyxa SC2-M1 by gene overexpression using the promoter P 04420

Based on metabolome analysis, fluorescence quantitative results (Fig. 5A), and the whole-genome protein sequences, the genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE might constitute an entire IPyA pathway of IAA synthesis in strain SC2-M1. The overexpression of patA, ilvB3, and fusE and the co-overexpression of patA-ilvB3-fusE by P04420 in P. polymyxa SC2-M1 increased IAA yield by 62%, 46%, 32%, and 60%, respectively (Fig. 5B). The overexpression of the related genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE could strengthen the IAA synthesis pathway and further increase the IAA yield of P. polymyxa SC2-M1. The IAA yield of the co-expression strain M1-C1 increased to 20.8 μg/mL, only indicating an increase of 60%, which was almost the same as the overexpression of the first key gene, patA. Moreover, the presence of the extra plasmid pHY300PLK in strain SC2-M1 (Fig. 5B) did not significantly affect the IAA yield compared with strain SC2-M1 without the plasmid (Fig. 2A). To further enhance the IAA synthetic ability of strain SC2-M1, more powerful related genes of the IPyA pathway or other IAA synthetic pathways should be considered. Furthermore, the genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE were also heterogeneously co-overexpressed in E. coli, and we detected a small yield of IAA (~ 2.9 µg/mL).

Construction and modification of heterologous IAA pathways in P. polymyxa SC2-M1

The IAM and IPyA pathways are the main IAA synthesis pathways in bacteria [72]. From the above results, overexpression of the native IPyA pathway increased the IAA yield of strain SC2-M1 (Fig. 5B), but not by enough. Therefore, constructing heterologous IAM and IPyA pathways might further strengthen the IAA synthesis ability of strain SC2-M1.

Overexpression of a heterologous IAM pathway of IAA synthesis in strain SC2-M1

The main genes driving the IAM pathway were iaam and iaah, and a homologous iaah gene was predicted in P. polymyxa SC2-M1 by KEGG analysis. Therefore, we further cloned an iaam gene from A. tumefaciens and expressed it by promoters Pgap or P04420 with different strengths to potentially construct the entire IAM pathway in strain SC2-M1. We detected the gene expression levels of iaam under promoters Pgap and P04420 in the medium supplemented with L-tryptophan. The results showed that the expression of the iaam gene by promoter P04420 was significantly higher than expression by promoter Pgap, by 36%. The IAA yield (Fig. 8) of the control strains SC2-M1-P, M1-Pgap-IAM, and M1-P04420-IAM were 13 μg/mL, 14.7 μg/mL, and 17.4 μg/mL, respectively. Compared with the control, the IAA yield of strains M1-Pgap-IAM and M1-P04420-IAM was increased by 13% and 34%, respectively. The IAM pathway-expressing strain under promoter P04420 had a higher IAA yield than that under promoter Pgap, which was also related to a higher transcription level of iaam gene expression under promoter P04420.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The IAA yield of strain SC2-M1 expressing heterologous IAA pathways. SC2-M1-P represents the control containing empty pHY300PLK. M1-Pgap-IAM and M1-P04420-IAM represent transformants of strain SC2-M1 expressing the heterologous gene iaam by promoter Pgap and P04420, respectively. M1-Pgap-IPyAAKA and M1-P04420-IPyAAKA represent transformants of strain SC2-M1 expressing heterologous genes aro8, kdc, and aldH by promoter Pgap and P04420, respectively. M1-P04420-IPyAJP6 represents the transformant of strain SC2-M1 expressing heterologous genes ELJP6_14505, ipdC, and ELJP6_00725 by promoter P04420. IAA yields were tested by the colorimetric method and adding 3 mM L-tryptophan in Landy medium for 72 h at 25 °C. Compared with the control, data that significantly increased (p < 0.05) were marked with *

Full size image

Overexpression of heterologous IPyA pathways of IAA synthesis in strain SC2-M1

For this section, we selected two heterologous IPyA pathways of IAA synthesis. One IPyA pathway contained genes aro8, kdc, and aldH and was expressed under promoter Pgap or P04420. The genes aro8 and kdc were obtained from yeast, and the gene aldH was obtained from E. coli. E. ludwigii JP6 was formerly isolated by our group and produces high levels of IAA (data not provided). The other IPyA pathway contained genes ELJP6_14505, ipdC, and ELJP6_00725 cloned from the genome of E. ludwigii JP6 and expressed only under promoter P04420. The mRNA expression levels of aro8, kdc, and aldH in strain SC2-M1 by promoter P04420 were all higher than those by promoter Pgap, and they were increased by 60%, 29%, and 28%, respectively. The genes aro8, kdc, and aldH were expressed at a higher level under promoter P04420. The IAA yield (Fig. 8) of strain M1-Pgap-IPyAAKA was increased by 21% compared with the control and reached 15.7 μg/mL. The IAA yield of strain M1-P04420-IPyAAKA was increased by 42% compared with the control and reached 18.4 μg/mL. In general, the IAA yield of strain M1-P04420-IPyAAKA was significantly higher than that of strain M1-Pgap-IPyAAKA, which was also consistent with the higher transcription levels of genes aro8, kdc, and aldH in strain M1-P04420-IPyAAKA than in strain M1-Pgap-IPyAAKA. The genes ELJP6_14505, ipdC, and ELJP6_00725 from E. ludwigii JP6 worked better. The IAA yield of strain M1-P04420-IPyAJP6 was significantly increased by 138% compared with the control and reached 31 μg/mL (Fig. 8). Moreover, the transcription levels of these three genes were significantly increased by L-tryptophan by 285%, 222%, and 157%, respectively. The above results show that the IAA yield of strain M1-P04420-IPyAJP6 was much higher than that of strains M1-Pgap-IPyAAKA and M1-P04420-IPyAAKA. The IAA yield of strain M1-P04420-IPyAJP6 was also tested by HPLC–MS and the yield of IAA was 32.2 µg/mL, which was almost the same as the result obtained with the colorimetric method (Fig. 8). This also indicated the reliability of the colorimetric method. The heterologous IPyA pathway from E. ludwigii JP6 presented the most significant function in strain SC2-M1 in our study, which was stronger than the tested heterologous IAM pathway and the heterologous IPyA pathway containing genes aro8, kdc, and aldH. Through analysis of the different IAM and IPyA pathways, the strongest IPyA pathway from E. ludwigii JP6 was finally selected, which could distinctly enhance the IAA synthesis ability of strain SC2-M1.

Discussion

P. polymyxa is commonly found in the soil rhizosphere and can promote plant growth through mechanisms such as producing plant hormones and fixing nitrogen levels [12]. The main plant hormone produced by P. polymyxa is IAA [69]. P. polymyxa SC2 and its mutant strain SC2-M1 isolated in our laboratory can produce a certain amount of IAA. The genes related to the biosynthesis of IAA in strain SC2-M1 were explored and strengthened to expand the research field of this pathway. In this study, the relevant genes of a native IPyA pathway of IAA synthesis were identified in strain SC2-M1. Two heterogeneous IPyA pathways and a heterogeneous IAM pathway of IAA synthesis were evaluated in strain SC2-M1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the metabolic engineering of the entire IAA synthesis pathway in P. polymyxa.

Studying the functional genes related to IAA biosynthesis requires promoters with appropriate expression strength. In this study, we screened the endogenously and highly expressed genes in strain SC2-M1 through transcriptome data [68], and 22 promoters were cloned for analysis. Our screened promoter sequences were different from those reported previously [60, 65]. The stable promoter P04420 with the strongest expression in our study was obtained and then modified through a synthetic biology strategy. Mutants of promoter P04420 with different expression activities were obtained and analyzed. This study moved further from the irrational selection of the promoter PLH-77 in the early stage of our group’s work [60]. Through the rational strategy screening of this study, the promoter expression system of P. polymyxa was further enriched and then used for the identification of genes related to IAA biosynthesis.

The common IAA synthesis pathways in bacteria are mainly the IPyA pathway and the IAM pathway [32, 72]. For the Gram-positive bacterium P. polymyxa, the indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase-encoding gene ipdC in the IPyA pathway was previously identified in P. polymyxa E681[40]; meanwhile, the ilvB gene (PPYC1_16985) in the IPyA pathway was detected in P. polymyxa YC0136 by our group, and the protein sequence similarity with the ipdC gene identified in P. polymyxa E681 was 100% [18]. As studied in P. polymyxa E681 [40], the existence of only an IPyA pathway for IAA biosynthesis was investigated. Based on metabolome analysis, fluorescence quantitative results, and whole-genome protein sequences, this study uncovered three homologous genes related to the IPyA pathway in strain SC2-M1, revealing the existence of the endogenous IPyA pathway. After treatment with L-tryptophan, three genes, patA (PPSC2_17445), ilvB3 (PPSC2_07070), and fusE (PPSC2_00395), were significantly induced in strain SC2-M1. In a preliminary study, Shao et al. [32] identified patB, yclC, and dhaS as candidate genes related to IAA synthesis in B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 and constructed a complete IPyA pathway. Using NCBI blast, the genes patA and fusE of strain SC2-M1 were similar to the genes patB and dhas of B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 [32], and their protein sequence similarities were 37.6% and 23.8%, respectively. The ilvB3 gene of strain SC2-M1 was similar to the ipdC gene of P. polymyxa E681, and their protein sequence similarity was 100% [18]. PatA, ilvB3, and fusE constituted an entire IPyA pathway of IAA synthesis in strain SC2-M1. The strong promoter P04420 was used to overexpress the genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE in E. coli and strain SC2-M1 and increased the production of IAA in both strains. The genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE overexpression in strain SC2-M1 significantly increased the IAA yield by 62%, 46%, and 32%, respectively. The IAA synthetic ability of strain SC2-M1 was enhanced, similar to the results of Shao et al. [32] overexpressing patB, yclC, and dhaS in B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 and increasing the IAA production of B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 by 67%, 59%, and 47%, respectively. The co-overexpression of the patA, ilvB3, and fusE genes in strain SC2-M1 could ultimately increase the corresponding IAA yield by 60% which had an obvious effect.

To further enhance the IAA synthetic ability of strain SC2-M1, an attempt was made to construct a heterologous IAM pathway. IAM pathways have rarely been studied in Gram-positive bacteria. As reported, no genes related to the synthesis of the IAM pathway were found in the genome of B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 [32], which was homologous to strain SC2-M1. Through the joint analysis of the genome and metabolome of strain SC2-M1, we found that strain SC2-M1 includes homologous genes gatA1 (PPSC2_07840), gat (PPSC2_12215), and yhaA1 (PPSC2_13350) related to the gene iaah in the IAM pathway but lacks the key tryptophan monooxygenase gene iaam. This study attempted to enhance the IAA synthetic ability of strain SC2-M1 by enhancing its IAM pathway, and an iaam gene of A. tumefaciens was heterologously expressed in strain SC2-M1 with different strength promoters to construct a complete IAM pathway. The results showed that transformant expression of the iaam gene could increase the IAA yield of strain SC2-M1 and that the strong promoter P04420 was better than the low-activity promoter Pgap, although its increase in IAA was still not ideal. However, the combination and optimization of the IAM pathway in this study laid the foundation for further exploration of the IAM pathway in Gram-positive bacteria.

Meanwhile, two heterologous IPyA pathways were introduced into strain SC2-M1 to enhance IAA synthesis. Three genes, aro8, kdc, and aldH, were cloned and expressed using the promoters Pgap and P04420 to construct entire IPyA pathways, and the IAA yield of the P04420-expressing strain was increased by 42%, up to 18.4 μg/mL. This result also proved the effectiveness of the strong promoter P04420 for the expression of genes in strain SC2-M1. The promoter P04420 was also used to clone three genes, ELJP6_14505, ipdC, and ELJP6_00725, of a predicted IPyA pathway from E. ludwigii JP6. The IAA yield of the obtained strain was much higher than that of the original strain, reaching 31 μg/mL. The IAA yield of this IPyA pathway from E. ludwigii JP6 was higher than that of the IPyA pathway constructed by aro8, kdc, and aldH, and it was also higher than the endogenous IPyA pathway and the heterologous IAM pathway overexpressing strains. The IPyA pathway from E. ludwigii JP6 had good adaptability in strain SC2-M1. During synthesis of IAA through the IPyA pathway, the amounts of some intermediate products, indole-3-ethanol, indole-3-lactic acid, and indole-3-acetamide, were also changed (data not provided). In this study, the use of the novel promoter P04420 to clone the IPyA pathway from E. ludwigii JP6 was beneficial for IAA synthesis in P. polymyxa, and this could deepen the understanding of the IAA biosynthetic pathway of P. polymyxa.

At present, the synthesis of IAA by P. polymyxa SC2-M1 has not yet reached an optimal production level, and it is necessary to move further and combine multiple strategies to increase the production of IAA. The genes related to the biosynthesis and regulation of IAA in strain SC2-M1 also need to be further explored and strengthened.

Conclusions

In this study, a novel, strong, and stable promoter, P04420, was selected, analyzed, and then evaluated to express IAA synthetic genes in P. polymyxa SC2-M1. Through metabonomic and genomic analysis, native IPyA pathway genes of IAA synthesis in P. polymyxa SC2-M1 were predicted. Furthermore, a heterogeneous gene iaam in the IAM pathway and two heterogeneous IPyA pathways of IAA synthesis were verified to improve the IAA yield of P. polymyxa SC2-M1. The genes ELJP6_14505, ipdC, and ELJP6_00725 of an entire IPyA pathway from E. ludwigii JP6 worked well for significantly increasing the IAA yield from promoter P04420 in P. polymyxa SC2-M1. Our results lay the foundation for further optimization of IAA synthetic pathways and the mining regulatory genes in P. polymyxa as a framework for future research.

Materials and methods

Plasmid and strain construction

The gene fragments of selected promoters were cloned into the Xba I and BamH I sites of the plasmid pHY300PLK-gfp-cm using Gibson assembly [73, 74], resulting in plasmid pHY300PLK-Promoterf-gfp-cm. The gene fragments of α-amylase were cloned from the genome of P. polymyxa SC2-M1 and then expressed by promoters P04420, P04420-4, P04420-6, P04420-8, and P04420-9 using Gibson assembly, resulting in the plasmid pHY300PLK-Promoterg-amylase. The gene fragments patA, ilvB3, and fusE were cloned from the genome of P. polymyxa SC2-M1 and then fused with the promoter P04420, and the resulting segments were cloned into the Xba I and BamH I sites of the plasmid pHY300PLK, resulting in plasmids pHY300PLK-patA, pHY300PLK-ilvB3, and pHY300PLK-fusE, respectively. The genes patA, ilvB3, and fusE were also co-expressed by the promoter P04420 and SD sequence (5′-AGGAGGCATATCAA-3′) in the plasmid pHY300PLK, resulting in the plasmid pHY300PLK-patA-ilvB3-fusE. A gene iaam was cloned from A. tumefaciens and fused with the promoters Pgap or P04420 and then cloned into the Xba I and BamH I sites of the plasmid pHY300PLK, resulting in the plasmids pHY300PLK-Pgap-IAM and pHY300PLK-P04420-IAM, respectively. The genes aro8 and kdc from yeast, and the gene aldH from E. coli [30] were synthesized (Beijing Genomics Institution, China) and then co-expressed by promoters Pgap or P04420 in the plasmid pHY300PLK, resulting in the plasmids pHY300PLK-Pgap-IPyAAKA and pHY300PLK-P04420-IPyAAKA, respectively. The gene fragments ELJP6_14505, ipdC, and ELJP6_00725 were cloned from the genome of Enterobacter ludwigii JP6 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NZ_CP040256.1) and then cloned into the Xba I and BamH I sites of the plasmid pHY300PLK and co-expressed by promoter P04420 and SD sequence (5′-AGGAGGCATATCAA-3′), resulting in the plasmid pHY300PLK-P04420-IPyAJP6. The gene fragments of promoters Pgap and P04420 were cloned into the plasmid pHY300PLK, resulting in the plasmids pHY300PLK-Pgap and pHY300PLK-P04420, respectively.

E. coli DH5α was used for plasmid subcloning and amplification. E. coli DH5α, P. polymyxa SC2-M1, and B. subtilis 168 were selected as the promoter-expressing strains. E. coli DH5α and P. polymyxa SC2-M1 were selected as the α-amylase-expressing and IAA pathway-expressing strains. The corresponding transformation methods of P. polymyxa SC2-M1 were conducted as previously reported by our group [60]. The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2. The corresponding primers are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Table 2 Strains and plasmids used in this study
Full size table

Medium and batch cultivation of strains

Cultivation of strains E. coli DH5α, P. polymyxa SC2, P. polymyxa SC2-M1, and B. subtilis 168 was performed with liquid Luria–Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with 30 μg/mL ampicillin, 15 μg/mL or 30 μg/mL tetracycline, or nothing [75]. For solid culture, 20 g/L agar was added. For IAA production of P. polymyxa, the bacteria were grown for 72 h in Landy medium containing 3 mM L-tryptophan at 25 °C and 90 rpm [18]. For IAA production of E. coli, R2A medium was used [76]. All strains were cultivated in triangular flasks for batch cultivation. Single colonies of fresh strains were preincubated and then transferred to fresh media for growth curve testing. The values of culture optical density (OD600) were tested with a BioPhotometer Plus (Eppendorf, Germany) to construct growth curves.

Metabolomic analysis

Strain SC2-M1 was inoculated into 50 mL liquid LB and then cultured overnight at 37 °C as a seed solution. The next day, strain SC2-M1 was diluted to OD600 = 0.5 and inoculated into 50 mL Landy medium at an inoculation amount of 1%. The Landy medium of the test group (M1-T) contained 3 mM L-tryptophan compared with the control group (M1) using only Landy medium. Each group contained 4 biological replicates that were cultured at 37 °C for 9 h. For each biological replicate, a total of 1.5 mL of cell solution was taken, flash-frozen with liquid nitrogen, and then sent to Beijing Genomics Institution (BGI, China) for metabolomic analysis.

Quantitative real-time PCR

All measurements were independently conducted in the manner previously reported by our group [68].

Measurements of the whole-cell fluorescence intensities

Single colonies of fresh strains were preincubated in LB liquid medium for 24 h and then transferred to fresh media at a final concentration of 10% for 24 h incubation, or for growth curve testing. The cultivated cells were washed and then diluted with 50 mmol/L phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7) to analyze the whole-cell fluorescence intensities [60] on a CLARIO star, a multimode microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Germany). The growth time of all recombinant bacteria was 24 h, and the gain value was 1600. To evaluate the strength of different promoters, the values of the whole-cell relative fluorescence units were divided by the cell density OD600 (RFU/OD600) [70]. The epifluorescence images of the strains were taken by a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Germany). The laser intensity was 25, the exposure value was 85, and the gain value was 100.

Assay method of α-amylase activities by starch hydrolysis on plates

An appropriate amount of strains cultured overnight was adjusted to OD600 = 0.5 with sterile LB, and then 0.3 μL was placed onto LB solid medium containing 1% starch to cultivate in an incubator. Several hours later, an appropriate amount of I2–KI solution was placed on the petri dish. After 10 min in the dark, the petri dish was re to measure the size of the transparent circle produced by the bacterial extracellular α-amylase by hydrolyzing the surrounding starch. The activity of α-amylase was proportional to the size of the transparent circle [77].

Analytical methods of IAA and related derivatives

Colorimetric method

This method was performed as previously reported by our group [18].

HPLC–MS analysis

The concentration of IAA was quantified by HPLC–MS according to a reported procedure [32].

Availability of data and materials

All data of this study are included in the published article and its supplemental files.

Abbreviations

PGPR:

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

IPyA:

Indole-3-pyruvic acid

IAM:

Indole-3-acetamide

IAN:

Indole-3-acetonitrile

TAM:

Tryptamine

TSO:

Tryptophan side-chain oxidase

IAAlD:

Indole-3-acetaldehyde

IPDC:

Indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase

IAOx:

Indole-3-acetaldoxime

AEC:

Auxin efflux carrier

RPKM:

Reads per kilobase of transcript per million reads mapped

RBS:

Ribosome binding site

GFP:

Green fluorescent protein

References

  1. Okonkwo CC, Ujor V, Cornish K, Ezeji TC. Inactivation of the levansucrase gene in Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365 diminishes exopolysaccharide biosynthesis during 2,3-butanediol fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e00196-e220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Soliman M. Paenibacillus polymyxa and Bacillus aryabhattai as biocontrol agents against Ralstonia solanacearum in vitro and in planta. J Plant Protect Pathol. 2020;11(3):197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soni R, Keharia H. Phytostimulation and biocontrol potential of Gram-positive endospore-forming Bacilli. Planta. 2021;254(3):49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Etesami H, Maheshwari DK. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;156:225–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan MS, Gao J, Chen X, Zhang M, Yang F, Du Y, Moe TS, Munir I, Xue J, Zhang X. Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa SK1 from Lilium lancifolium. Biomed Res Int. 2020;27:8650957.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de França Bettencourt GM, Degenhardt J, Dos Santos GD, Vicente VA, Soccol CR. Metagenomic analyses, isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria associated with Eucalyptus urophylla BRS07-01 in vitro plants. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;37(10):021–03127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD. Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993;64(3–4):253–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan Z, Son SH, Akhtar J, Gautam NK, Kim YH. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (Paenibacillus polymyxa) induced systemic resistance in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita). Indian J Agric Sci. 2012;82:603–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Basak BB, Biswas DR. Influence of potassium solubilizing microorganism (Bacillus mucilaginosus) and waste mica on potassium uptake dynamics by Sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) grown under two Alfisols. Plant Soil. 2009;317(1–2):235–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bal HB, Das S, Dangar TK, Adhya TK. ACC deaminase and IAA producing growth promoting bacteria from the rhizosphere soil of tropical rice plants. J Basic Microbiol. 2013;53(12):972–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Han HS, Supanjani, Lee KD. Effect of co-inoculation with phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria on mineral uptake and growth of pepper and cucumber. Plant Soil Environ. 2006;52(3):130–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohamed I, Eid KE, Abbas MHH, Salem AA, Ahmed N, Ali M, Shah GM, Fang C. Use of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizae to improve the growth and nutrient utilization of common bean in a soil infected with white rot fungi. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;171:539–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan N, Zandi P, Ali S, Mehmood A, Adnan SM. Impact of salicylic acid and PGPR on the drought tolerance and phytoremediation potential of Helianthus annus. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohite B. Isolation and characterization of indole acetic acid (IAA) producing bacteria from rhizospheric soil and its effect on plant growth. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162013005000051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ying J, Yue W, Xu W, Cheng Y, Chen J, Li X, Feng H, Li H. IAA-producing bacteria and bacterial-feeding nematodes promote Arabidopsis thaliana root growth in natural soil. Eur J Soil Biol. 2012;52:20–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Santoro MV, Cappellari LR, Giordano W, Banchio E, Papen H. Plant growth-promoting effects of native Pseudomonas strains on Mentha piperita (peppermint): an in vitro study. Plant Biol. 2015;17(6):1218–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tahir HAS, Gu Q, Wu H, Raza W, Safdar A, Huang Z, Rajer FU, Gao X. Effect of volatile compounds produced by Ralstonia solanacearum on plant growth promoting and systemic resistance inducing potential of Bacillus volatiles. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu H, Wang J, Sun H, Han X, Du B. Transcriptome profiles reveal the growth-promoting mechanisms of Paenibacillus polymyxa YC0136 on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Front Microbiol. 2020;11:584174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Anand R, Grayston S, Chanway C. N2-fixation and seedling growth promotion of lodgepole pine by endophytic Paenibacillus polymyxa. Microb Ecol. 2013;66(2):369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA. Biocontrol of a chickpea root-rot disease complex with Glomus intraradices, Pseudomonas putida and Paenibacillus polymyxa. Australas Plant Pathol. 2007;36(2):175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu SJ, Jing ZQ, Guo ZJ, Li QQ, Zhang XR. Growth-promoting and disease-suppressing effects of Paenibacillus polymyxa strain YCP16-23 on pepper (Capsicum annuum) plants. Trop Plant Pathol. 2020;45(4):415–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng W, Yang J, Nie Q, Huang D, Zhang J. Volatile organic compounds from Paenibacillus polymyxa KM2501-1 control Meloidogyne incognita by multiple strategies. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang P, Chen C, Wang Z, Fan B, Chen Z. A pathogen- and salicylic acid-induced WRKY DNA-binding activity recognizes the elicitor response element of the tobacco class I chitinase gene promoter. Plant J. 2010;18(2):141–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly M. Comparisons and cross reactions of nitrogenase from Klebsiella pneumoniae, Azotobacter chroococcum and Bacillus polymyxa. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1969;191(3):527–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Timmusk S, Copolovici D, Copolovici L, Teder T, Nevo E, Behers L. Paenibacillus polymyxa biofilm polysaccharides antagonise Fusarium graminearum. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdallah Y, Yang M, Zhang M, Masum MMI, Ogunyemi SO, Hossain A, An Q, Yan C, Li B. Plant growth promotion and suppression of bacterial leaf blight in rice by Paenibacillus polymyxa Sx3. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019;68(5):423–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan Y, Xu QM, Yu SC, Sun HZ, Cheng JS, Yuan YJ. Control of the polymyxin analog ratio by domain swapping in the nonribosomal peptide synthetase of Paenibacillus polymyxa. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;47(6–7):551–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Da Mota FF, Gomes EA, Seldin L. Auxin production and detection of the gene coding for the Auxin Efflux Carrier (AEC) protein in Paenibacillus polymyxa. J Microbiol. 2008;46(3):257–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baudoin E, Lerner A, Mirza MS, Zemrany HE, Prigent-Combaret C, Jurkevich E, Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Nazaret S, Okon Y. Effects of Azospirillum brasilense with genetically modified auxin biosynthesis gene ipdC upon the diversity of the indigenous microbiota of the wheat rhizosphere. Res Microbiol. 2010;161(3):219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo D, Zhang L, Kong S, Liu Z, Chu X, Li X, Pan H. Synthesis of three major auxins from glucose in engineered Escherichia coli. bioRxiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/347930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang B, Li P, Wang Y, Wang J, Liu X, Wang X, Hu X. Characterization and synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid in plant growth promoting Enterobacter sp. RSC Adv. 2021;11(50):31601–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shao J, Li S, Zhang N, Cui X, Zhou X, Zhang G, Shen Q, Zhang R. Analysis and cloning of the synthetic pathway of the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid in the plant-beneficial Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Azeem K, Muhammad A, Zahir ZA, Muhammad K. Relative efficiency of rhizobacteria for auxin biosynthesis. J Biol Sci. 2001;1(8):750–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mcclerklin SA, Goo LS, Harper CP, Ron N, Jez JM, Kunkel BN, David M. Indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase-dependent auxin synthesis contributes to virulence of Pseudomonas syringae strain DC3000. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(1): e1006811.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Oberhansli T, Defago G, Haas D. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) synthesis in the biocontrol strain CHA0 of Pseudomonas fluorescens: role of tryptophan side chain oxidase. J Gen Microbiol. 1991;137(10):2273–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Puspendu S, Frank K, Borkovich KA. Characterization of indole-3-pyruvic acid pathway-mediated biosynthesis of auxin in Neurospora crassa. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2): e0192293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Keswani C, Singh SP, Cueto L, García-Estrada C, Mezaache-Aichour S, Glare TR, Borriss R, Singh SP, Blázquez MA, Sansinenea E. Auxins of microbial origin and their use in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(20):8549–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Koga J. Structure and function of indolepyruvate decarboxylase, a key enzyme in indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1995;1249(1):1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li M, Guo R, Yu F, Chen X, Zhao H, Li H, Wu J. Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis pathways in the plant-beneficial bacterium Arthrobacter pascens ZZ21. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):443.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Phi QT, Park YM, Ryu CM, Park SH, Ghim SY. Functional identification and expression of indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase from Paenibacillus polymyxa E681. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(7):1235–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Clark E, Manulis S, Ophir Y, Barash I, Gafni Y. Cloning and characterization of iaaM and iaaH from Erwinia herbicola pathovar gypsophilae. Phytopathology. 1993;83(2):234–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Theunis M, Kobayashi H, Broughton WJ, Prinsen E. Flavonoids, NodD1, NodD2, and nod-box NB15 modulate expression of the y4wEFG locus that is required for indole-3-acetic acid synthesis in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004;17(10):1153–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mashiguchi K, Hisano H, Takeda-Kamiya N, Takebayashi Y, Ariizumi T, Gao Y, Ezura H, Sato K, Zhao Y, Hayashi KI, Kasahara H. Agrobacterium tumefaciens enhances biosynthesis of two distinct auxins in the formation of crown galls. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019;60(1):29–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirilova EM, Nikolaeva ID, Romanovska E, Pukins AI, Belyakov SV. The synthesis of novel heterocyclic 3-acetamide derivatives of benzanthrone. Chem Heterocycl Compd. 2020;56(2):192–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hooykaas MJG, Hooykaas PJJ. Complete genomic sequence and phylogenomics analysis of Agrobacterium strain AB2/73: a new Rhizobium species with a unique mega-Ti plasmid. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Duca D, Rose DR, Glick BR. Characterization of a nitrilase and a nitrile hydratase from Pseudomonas sp. strain UW4 that converts indole-3-acetonitrile to indole-3-acetic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(15):4640–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Perez-Martinez I, Zhao Y, Murillo J, Sundin GW, Ramos C. Global genomic analysis of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi plasmids. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(2):625–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kochar M, Upadhyay A, Srivastava S. Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis in the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens Psd and plant growth regulation by hormone overexpression. Res Microbiol. 2011;162(4):426–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Duarte D, Amaro F, Silva I, Silva D, Fresco P, Oliveira JC, Reguengo H, Gonalves J, Vale N. Carbidopa alters tryptophan metabolism in breast cancer and melanoma cells leading to the formation of indole-3-acetonitrile, a pro-proliferative metabolite. Biomolecules. 2019;9(9):409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Duran R, Nishiyama M, Horinouchi S, Beppu T. Characterization of nitrile hydratase genes cloned by DNA screening from Rhodococcus erythropolis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1993;57(8):1323–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kobayashi M, Suzuki T, Fujita T, Masuda M, Shimizu S. Occurrence of enzymes involved in biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid from indole-3-acetonitrile in plant-associated bacteria, Agrobacterium and Rhizobium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(3):714–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Romasi EF, Lee J. Development of indole-3-acetic acid-producing Escherichia coli by functional expression of IpdC, AspC, and Iad1. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;23(12):1726–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu C, Tang L, Liang Y, Jiao S, Luo H. Novel chaperones RrGroEL and RrGroES for activity and stability enhancement of nitrilase in Escherichia coli and Rhodococcus ruber. Molecules. 2020;25(4):1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Stolz A, Eppinger E, Sosedov O, Kiziak C. Comparative analysis of the conversion of mandelonitrile and 2-phenylpropionitrile by a large set of variants generated from a nitrilase originating from Pseudomonas fluorescens EBC191. Molecules. 2019;24(23):4232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Stowe P. On the ability of Taphrina deformans to produce indoleacetic acid from tryptophan by way of tryptamine. Plant Physiol. 1966;41(2):234–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Rädisch R, Chmátal M, Rucká L, Novotný P, Martínková L. Overproduction and characterization of the first enzyme of a new aldoxime dehydratase family in Bradyrhizobium sp. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;115:746.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Corbell N, Loper JE. A global regulator of secondary metabolite production in Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(21):6230–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cherchali A, Boukhelata N, Kaci Y, Abrous-Belbachir O, Djebbar R. Isolation and identification of a phosphate-solubilizing Paenibacillus polymyxa strain GOL 0202 from durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) rhizosphere and its effect on some seedlings morphophysiological parameters. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019;19:101087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Phi QT, Oh SH, Park YM, Park SH, Ryu CM, Ghim SY. Isolation and characterization of transposon-insertional mutants from Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 altering the biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Curr Microbiol. 2008;56(5):524–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Li H, Ding Y, Zhao J, Ge R, Qiu B, Yang X, Yao L, Liu K, Wang C, Du B. Identification of a native promoter PLH-77 for gene expression in Paenibacillus polymyxa. J Biotechnol. 2019;295:19–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Li S, Wang J, Xiao L, Yin S, Wang W, Yang K. Genome-wide identification and evaluation of constitutive promoters in streptomycetes. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Li Y, Zhang H, Chen S. Fusaricidin biosynthesis is controlled via a KinB-Spo0A-AbrB signal pathway in Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2021;34(12):1378–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Rytter JV, Helmark S, Chen J, Lezyk MJ, Solem C, Jensen PR. Synthetic promoter libraries for Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(6):2617–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Brito LF, Irla M, Walter T, Wendisch VF. Magnesium aminoclay-based transformation of Paenibacillus riograndensis and Paenibacillus polymyxa and development of tools for gene expression. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(2):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Heinze S, Zimmermann K, Ludwig C, Heinzlmeir S, Schwarz WH, Zverlov VV, Liebl W, Kornberger P. Evaluation of promoter sequences for the secretory production of a Clostridium thermocellum cellulase in Paenibacillus polymyxa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(23):10147–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ma M, Wang C, Ding Y, Li L, Shen D, Jiang X, Guan D, Cao F, Chen H, Feng R. Complete genome sequence of Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2, a strain of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. J Bacteriol. 2010;193:311–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu H, Li Y, Ge K, Du B, Liu K, Wang C, Ding Y. Interactional mechanisms of Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2 and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) suggested by transcriptomics. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Hou X, Yu X, Du B, Liu K, Yao L, Zhang S, Selin C, Fernando W, Wang C, Ding Y. A single amino acid mutation in Spo0A results in sporulation deficiency of Paenibacillus polymyxa SC2. Res Microbiol. 2016;167(6):472–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R. Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007;31(4):425–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Shi L, Li K, Zhang H, Xu L, Lin J, Wei D. Identification of a novel promoter gHp0169 for gene expression in Gluconobacter oxydans. J Biotechnol. 2014;175(1):69–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Doi RH, Wang LF. Multiple prokaryotic ribonucleic acid polymerase sigma factors. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50(3):227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Cook SD, Ross JJ. The auxins, IAA and PAA, are synthesized by similar steps catalyzed by different enzymes. Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11: e1250993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Gibson DG. Enzymatic assembly of overlapping DNA fragments. Methods Enzymol. 2011;498:349–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Wang C, Li Y, Qiu C, Wang S, Ma J, Shen Y, Zhang Q, Du B, Ding Y, Bao X. Identification of important amino acids in Gal2p for improving the L-arabinose transport and metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Ma J, Wang C, Wang H, Liu K, Zhang T, Yao L, Zhao Z, Du B, Ding Y. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of Bacillus atrophaeus GQJK17 reveals its biocontrol characteristics as a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Thapa S, Prasanna R, Ranjan K, Velmourougane K, Ramakrishnan B. Nutrients and host attributes modulate the abundance and functional traits of phyllosphere microbiome in rice. Microbiol Res. 2017;204:55–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Jeon YH, Kim SG, Hwang I, Kim YH. Effects of initial inoculation density of Paenibacillus polymyxa on colony formation and starch-hydrolytic activity in relation to root rot in ginseng. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;109(2):461–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Zhen Kang from School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University in China, for kindly guiding the related work of Bacillus subtilis.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170133, 31700094, and 31770115), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFD0200804), Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program (Major Science and Technology Innovation Project)—Boost Plan for Rural Vitalization Science and Technology Innovation (No. 2021TZXD001-01-02), and the Tai-Shan Scholar Program from the Shandong Provincial Government.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Huimin Sun and Jikun Zhang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life Sciences, Shandong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Engineering Research Center of Plant-Microbia Restoration for Saline-Alkali Land, Shandong Agricultural University, 61 Daizong Street, Tai’an, 271018, China

    Huimin Sun, Jikun Zhang, Wenteng Liu, Wenhui E, Xin Wang, Hui Li, Yanru Cui, Dongying Zhao, Kai Liu, Binghai Du, Yanqin Ding & Chengqiang Wang

Authors
  1. Huimin Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jikun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenteng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenhui E
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yanru Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dongying Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kai Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Binghai Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yanqin Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Chengqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CW and BD designed the study. HS, JZ, WL, WE, and XW performed the laboratory work and analyzed the data. WE, HL, YC, DZ, KL, and YD advised on the manuscript. CW, HS and WL wrote the manuscript. CW, YD, and BD supported the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanqin Ding or Chengqiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. The DNA oligos used in this study. Table S2. Enrichment results of metabolic pathways. Table S3. The predicted characteristics of selected promoters. Table S4. The sequence characteristics of original P04420 and its modified derivatives. Figure S1. Schematic representation of conserved bases (-10, -35, and SD regions) in the promoter sequences of 77 high transcription level genes. Figure S2. Fluorescent microscopic observation of GFP that expressed by high strength promoters in strain SC2-M1. Figure S3. Fluorescence intensity of GFP that expressed by different promoters. Figure S4. Assay of α-amylase activities by starch hydrolysis on plates.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, H., Zhang, J., Liu, W. et al. Identification and combinatorial engineering of indole-3-acetic acid synthetic pathways in Paenibacillus polymyxa. Biotechnol Biofuels 15, 81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02181-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02181-3

Keywords

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

ISSN: 2731-3654

Contact us