Skip to main content

Secretion of collagenases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae for collagen degradation

Abstract

Background

The production and processing of animal-based products generates many collagen-rich by-products, which have received attention both for exploitation to increase their added value and to reduce their negative environmental impact. The collagen-rich by-products can be hydrolyzed by collagenases for further utilization. Therefore, collagenases are of benefit for efficient collagen materials processing. An alternative and safe way to produce secreted collagenases is needed.

Results

Two collagenases from Hathewaya histolytica, ColG and ColH, were successfully secreted by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Compared with the native signal peptide of collagenase, the α-factor leader is more efficient in guiding collagenase secretion. Collagenase secretion was significantly increased in YPD medium by supplementing with calcium and zinc ions. Recombinant collagenase titers reached 68 U/mL and 55 U/mL for ColG and ColH, respectively. Collagenase expression imposed metabolic perturbations on yeast cells; substrate consumption, metabolites production and intracellular cofactor levels changed in engineered strains. Both recombinant collagenases from yeast could hydrolyze soluble and insoluble collagen materials. Recombinant ColG and ColH showed a synergistic effect on efficient collagen digestion.

Conclusions

Sufficient calcium and zinc ions are essential for active collagenase production by yeast. Collagenase secretion was increased by optimization of expression cassettes. Collagenase expression imposed metabolic burden and cofactor perturbations on yeast cells, which could be improved through metabolic engineering. Our work provides a useful way to produce collagenases for collagen resource utilization.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Animal-derived protein consumption has increased in recent decades to support the growing global population and improved quality of life [1]. The production and processing of these animal-based products generates many by-products, such as horns, hooves, skin, bones and scales. These by-products are not edible or cannot be sold on the market. They are either simply processed into low-value products or dumped, which cause environmental problems [2]. However, these by-products can be utilized in a more effective way to reduce environmental burden and their added value can be increased with advanced techniques. Enzymatic processing is an important way to extract bioactive compounds from these by-products. Compared with chemical processes involving extreme conditions (high temperatures, high pressure, corrosive chemicals), enzymatic hydrolysis under mild condition provides a more acceptable way to obtain high-quality bioactive extracts with low toxicity and a low environmental impact [3]. The by-products of livestock, poultry and aquaculture usually contain a large amount of collagen. The bioactive peptides hydrolyzed by collagenases from these by-products have shown antioxidant, antihypertensive and antidiabetic effects. Therefore, they have broad application in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [4,5,6,7].

Collagenases are enzymes capable of cleaving native collagen under physiological conditions [8]. Hathewaya histolytica collagenases are the most well studied microbial collagenase and are recognized as the gold standard for comparing newly found collagenolytic enzymes [9]. Currently, H. histolytica collagenases play an important role in medical treatment for wound healing, burns, keloid, cellulite and some diseases including Dupuytren’s disease, intervertebral disc herniation, urologic disease and others [10,11,12]. There are two classes of collagenases secreted by H. histolytica, and they are classified based on their hydrolytic activity against natural collagen substrates and a specific synthetic substrate FALGPA (N-[3-(2-furyl) acryloyl]-Leu-Gly-Pro-Ala) [13,14,15]. Class I collagenase, encoded by colG shows high activity against collagen and moderate activity against FALGPA, whereas class II collagenase, encoded by colH has lower activity against collagen and higher activity against FALGPA [16,17,18,19].

Although collagenases can be produced by H. histolytica, other unwanted components, such as clostripin, trypsin and neutral protease, are also found in crude collagenases and cause deterioration of crude collagenase during storage [20]. High-purity collagenase requires tedious purification steps, during which the production cost increases and collagenase activity may reduce. Furthermore, H. histolytica is pathogenic in humans, which hinders application of its collagenases in the field considering safety as a priority. Researchers have produced recombinant H. histolytica collagenases by using Escherichia coli expression system [21, 22]. Although both ColG and ColH were expressed successfully, these collagenases were of intracellular expression and sometimes encountered insolubility problems. Therefore, an alternative and safe way to produce secreted collagenases is needed. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one of the most popular hosts for protein production, as it possesses a protein secretory pathway, is easily manipulated and has tolerance to industrial conditions [23]. Considering its GRAS status and widespread use in the food industry, supernatant containing recombinant enzymes from yeast cultures can possibly be applied in downstream processes directly. However, there are few reports on the heterologous expression of collagenase from H. histolytica in eukaryotes.

In this study, we successfully expressed the H. histolytica collagenases in secreted form by S. cerevisiae. Culture conditions and expression cassettes were optimized for efficient collagenase production. Influences on physiological traits of yeast cells by collagenase expression were also characterized. Collagen could be degraded by recombinant collagenases from yeast, and the synergistic effect of two recombinant collagenases was revealed for efficient collagen digestion. Our study provides a useful way to produce collagenases for better utilization of collagen resources.

Results and discussion

Recombinant collagenase expression in S. cerevisiae

In this study, both collagenase ColG (UniProt Entry: Q9X721) and collagenase ColH (UniProt Entry: Q46085) from H. histolytica were expressed in S. cerevisiae. The yeast strain S. cerevisiae B184M [24], a UV mutant with superior protein secretion, was chosen as the host strain for the heterologous expression of ColG and ColH. A widely used signal peptide in yeast, the α-factor leader, was used for directing secretion. Firstly, codon-optimized genes colG and colH fused with signal leader sequences were inserted into the vector CPOTud, resulting in pCP_G01 and pCP_H01 (Fig. 1 and Table 1), respectively. Both pCP_G01 and pCP_H01 were transformed to strain B184M, and strains BG01 and BH01 were obtained. Then strains BG01 and BH01 were tested for their collagenase expression in YPD medium, but little collagenase activity was detected in the supernatant.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Construction scheme of plasmids for recombinant expression of collagenases. α-factor leader: the leader sequence of the α-factor mating pheromone; α-factor leader + spacer: α-factor leader with a spacer sequence (EEGEPK) replacement of EAEA at the C-terminus; α-factor pre: the pre region of α-factor leader

Table 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study

Similar to other metalloproteases, ColG and ColH also require Zn2+ for catalytic reaction and are stabilized by Ca2+ [25,26,27,28,29]. We speculated that YPD medium without enough Ca2+ and Zn2+ ions would repress collagenase activity and supplementation of Ca2+ and Zn2+ to the medium would help collagenase expression. Therefore, we cultured strain BG01 in YPD medium with various concentrations of CaCl2 and ZnCl2, and collagenase activity did increase significantly (Fig. 2). When CaCl2 and ZnCl2 were solely added to YPD medium, the collagenase ColG activity was higher in the range of 10 ~ 20 mM CaCl2 (Fig. 2A) and 0.6 mM ZnCl2 was better (Fig. 2B). To reduce potential negative effects of excessive ions, 10 mM CaCl2 was selected for combinational addition with ZnCl2. As expected, simultaneous addition of CaCl2 and ZnCl2 increased collagenase ColG activity further (Fig. 2C). The optimal concentration of ZnCl2 in the presence of 10 mM CaCl2 for collagenase ColG expression was 0.6 mM, which was consistent with the result of adding ZnCl2 alone. Then, supplementation of CaCl2 and ZnCl2 to the medium was also tested for ColH expression. Like ColG, ColH achieved its optimal expression in YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.6 mM ZnCl2 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). These results confirm the importance of metal ions for heterologous expression of collagenase by yeast, and provided practical information for expression of other metalloproteases. It should be pointed out that selection of metal ions and optimal metal ion concentration depend on the properties of the metalloproteinase and host strain.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Optimization of metal ion concentration in culture medium. A YPD medium supplemented with different concentrations of CaCl2; B YPD medium supplemented with different concentrations of ZnCl2; C YPD medium containing 10 mM CaCl2 and supplemented with different concentrations of ZnCl2; D enzymatic assay of collagenase in supernatant using FALGPA (N-(3-[2-furyl]acryloyl)-Leu-Gly-Pro-Ala) as the substrate. The strain B0 harboring the empty plasmid CPOTud was used as control. Papain: 1 mg/mL papain solution. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01

Besides gelatin, the substrate FALGPA, a specific substrate for collagenase, was used to detect collagenase activity of ColG and ColH. Both BG01 and BH01 showed FALGPA hydrolysis activity, compared with no FALGPA activity by papain (Fig. 2D). This result again confirmed our success in heterologous secreted expression of ColG and ColH in yeast cells. Furthermore, BH01 had higher FALGPA hydrolysis activity than that of BG01. This result agreed with previous reports that class II collagenase (here, ColH) is more efficient in hydrolysis of FALGPA than class I collagenase [14].

Optimization of collagenase expression

After proving secretion of collagenase in yeast, we attempted to optimize secretion levels through altering the expression cassette. Therefore, we changed the signal leader in pCP_G01 to the native collagenase pre-peptide or α-factor pre. The ColG pro-peptide was also removed in some of these cassettes as detailed in Fig. 1 and Table 1. These new plasmids for ColG expression were constructed and transformed into strain B184M (Table1). ColG activity was different in these strains, among which strain BG02 had the highest collagenase titer and yield (Fig. 3A and Additional file 1: Fig. S2A). Distinctive halos were formed around BG02 colonies on the agar plate with 1% skimmed milk (Fig. 3B). Similarly, plasmids with different expression cassettes of ColH were constructed and transformed into strain B184M. Strain BH01 showed the highest ColH collagenase titer and yield among ColH expression strains (Fig. 3C and D, Additional file 1: Fig. S2B). Previously, it was reported that the pro-peptide is not essential for H. histolytica collagenases as intracellular expression by E. coli [30]. However, secreted expression H. histolytica collagenases in yeast was affected by the pro-peptide, especially for ColH. As pro-peptides can either directly assist or accelerate the protein folding process [31,32,33], it may provide benefits for proper folding of collagenases in yeast cells. However, details about the role of collagenase pro-peptides in yeast expression require further elucidation. As mentioned above, we used a mutant yeast strain B184M for collagenase expression. We subsequently tested the effect of collagenase expression in a wild-type yeast strain. Plasmids were transformed to the wild-type strain CEN.PK 530-1C [34], and collagenase activities were quantified for these strains (Fig. 3E and F). Although collagenase activity was detectable in the CEN.PK 530-1C strain with certain plasmids, the general collagenase production level by strain CEN.PK 530-1C was much lower than that of strain B184M. In previous studies, researchers showed the importance of promoter strength and regulation for gene expression [35, 36], To discover whether collagenase secretion was affected by using different promoters, we replaced the promoter–terminator TPI1p-TPI1t of the vector CPOTud with two other pairs PGK1p-CYC1t and TEF1p-ADH1t for ColG expression. Although ColG activity changed by using different promoters, no increased ColG activity was found. The promoter TPI1p was still the best for collagenase expression (Additional file 1: Fig. S3), and thus was used in the subsequent study. Achieving higher collagenase secretion levels may be possible through testing more combinatorial promoter–terminator pairs for fine-tuning of collagenase expression in future studies.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Collagenase secretion by yeast strains harboring plasmids with different expression cassettes. A Cell growth and collagenase secretion by B184M yeast strains expressing ColG, ** P < 0.01; B halo-plate assay for yeast strains expressing ColG; C cell growth and collagenase secretion by B184M yeast strains expressing ColH, ** P < 0.01; D halo-plate assay for yeast strains expressing ColH; E cell growth and collagenase secretion by CEN.PK 530-1C yeast strains expressing ColG; F cell growth and collagenase secretion by CEN.PK 530-1C yeast strains expressing ColH; strain B184M was derived from the strain CEN.PK 530-1C by UV mutation

Furthermore, we evaluated collagenase activity in case of adding metal ions to YPD medium before and after cultivation. As shown in Fig. 4, the collagenase activity in conditions of supplying metal ions before cultivation was much higher than after fermentation. Compared with the control (medium without additional metal ions), collagenase activities had little change when adding metal ions to medium after fermentation. This result indicates that metal ions were incorporated into collagenases during intracellular biological processing within yeast cells instead of in vitro assembly.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Metal ions involved in incorporation to collagenases during production in yeast cells instead of in vitro assembly. A Cell growth; B collagenase activity. None: strains B0, BG02 and BH01 were cultured in YPD medium without supplementation of CaCl2 and ZnCl2. Before: B0, BG02 and BH01 were cultured in YPD medium supplemented with 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.6 mM ZnCl2. After: B0, BG02 and BH01 were cultured in YPD medium; when fermentation was finished, CaCl2 and ZnCl2 were added to the culture at a final concentration of 10 mM and 0.6 mM, respectively. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01

Evaluation of yeast cell growth and collagenases expression

In order to investigate potential metabolism changes of yeast cells when expressing collagenases, strains BG02 and BH01 together with the control strain B0 were characterized in batch fermentation (Fig. 5). Although both strains BG02 and BH01 grew slower than the control strain B0 (Fig. 5B), the final biomass of strains BG02 and BH01 differed. Strain BH01 had lower final biomass than the control strain B0, yet the final biomass of strain BG02 was approximately 12% higher than that of strain B0. Compared with strain B0, strain BG02 and BH01 showed slower glucose consumption (Fig. 5C). Changes in biomass and glucose consumption suggest that collagenase expression imposed metabolic burden on yeast cells. Interestingly, the collagenase production process of ColG was different from that of ColH, though the collagenase activity and collagenase yield at the end of fermentation was similar for ColG and ColH (Fig. 5A and Additional file 1: Fig. S4). ColG reached a relatively high level earlier (at 48 h) and then increased slowly. ColH secretion lagged behind. Relatively little ColH was detected at 48 h and ColH collagenase activity started increasing afterwards. We also found that strains BG02 and BH01 produced less ethanol than strain B0 (Fig. 5D). In contrast, glycerol production by BG02 and BH01 was higher than that by strain B0 (Fig. 5E). These results indicate that intracellular energy demand and redox state was affected by expression of the collagenases. As a result of ColG expression, strain BG02 had higher ATP level and GSH (Additional file 1: Fig. S5A and S5B). This might explain the higher final biomass for strain BG02. Reduced NADH/NAD+ ratio and NADPH/NADP+ ratios were found in strain BG02 and BH01 (Additional file 1: Fig. S5C and S5D). This confirmed the metabolic impact of redox cofactor perturbations by expression of collagenases. Biosynthesis of amino acids for protein synthesis is linked with NADPH and NADH, which can be oxidized via mitochondrial respiration or glycerol production to maintain redox homeostasis [37]. Thus, supply of amino acids may be a direct way of decreasing the influence of recombinant protein production [38, 39]. Moreover, NADPH plays an important role in supporting ER normal function, which is essential for secreted protein folding [40]. Therefore, increasing the NADPH level or promoting additional NADH conversion to NADPH may also have a positive impact on recombinant proteins production.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Batch cultivation of strains BG02, BH01 and the control strain B0. A Collagenase production; B cell growth; C glucose consumption; D ethanol production; E glycerol production; F acetate production. YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.6 mM ZnCl2 was used for cell cultivation

Substrate degradation by recombinant collagenases

To test the degradation of collagen materials by recombinant collagenases, we added gelatin to culture medium. After fermentation, supernatants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, by which gelatin would be labeled. As shown in Fig. 6A, gelatin was successfully degraded by strains BG02 and BH01 during cultivation. Strains harboring plasmids with different collagenase cassettes were also tested for gelatin degradation (Additional file 1: Fig. S6), the result of which was consistent with their collagenase activity (Fig. 3A and C). As class I collagenases and class II collagenases have different hydrolytic preferences towards collagen [17, 41,42,43], we inferred a synergistic effect by ColG and ColH [44]. Therefore, we mixed supernatants of strains BG02 and BH01 in different proportions, and measured collagenase activity using gelatin as a substrate. A slight synergistic effect was found in the mixture of ColG as majority (Additional file 1: Fig. S7). As gelatin is a degraded form of collagen, the synergistic effect of BG02 and BH01 might be more significant for integral collagen. Hence, bovine insoluble collagen was used for digestion test by recombinant collagenases. Both recombinant collagenase ColG and collagenase ColH were able to degrade collagen, and ColG was more effective in digestion with a swelling manner. Furthermore, ColG and ColH did act synergistically in hydrolysis of collagen (Fig. 6B). This is consistent with the fact that ColG prefers to degrade collagen in a processive manner, while ColH tends to bind to these swollen areas for hydrolysis [25, 43]. Degradation of collagen fibrils by recombinant ColG and ColH was also revealed by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Fig. 6C, Additional file 1: Fig. S8). Compared with the control, the collagen substrate degraded by ColG and ColH was loose and the three-dimensional helix structure was much impaired. The sample degraded by ColG + ColH showed even more viscous and looser (Fig. 6C). These results support the effective degradation of collagen by recombinant collagenases from microscopic aspects.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Collagen substrate degradation by recombinant collagenases. A SDS-PAGE analysis of gelatin digestion by recombinant collagenases during cell cultivation. Strains were cultivated in YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2, 0.6 mM ZnCl2 and 1% gelatin at 30 °C for 96 h, then supernatant was used for analysis. Ref.: YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2, 0.6 mM ZnCl2 and 1% gelatin. B Collagen hydrolysis by recombinant collagenases. Strains were cultivated in YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.6 mM ZnCl2 at 30 °C for 96 h for collagenase production. The supernatant was collected and replaced with 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH = 7.5) by using an Amicon® Ultra filter (50 kDa). Subsequently, collagen was added to tubes and incubated at 37℃. G + H: supernatants from BG02 and BH01 were mixed with a ratio of 1:1. C Differences between recombinant ColG and ColH in collagen degradation were revealed at microscopic structure level by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with 20,000 × magnification. Day 1 degradation samples were used for SEM analysis

Conclusions

Two collagenases ColG and ColH were successfully secreted by S. cerevisiae. Supplementation of Ca2+ and Zn2+ was crucial for high-level collagenase production. Collagenase production was increased by optimization of expression cassettes. Collagenase expression imposed metabolic burden and cofactor perturbations on cells. The production processes of collagenases were different; ColG production reached a plateau earlier while ColH production had a lag phase. This provided clues for selecting potential targets to engineer yeast strains for efficient collagenase production in the future. Recombinant collagenases degraded collagen and the synergistic effect of collagenases contributed to efficient collagen digestion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a synergistic effect for collagen degradation by recombinant collagenases has been shown. Expression of collagenase in secreted form can simplify downstream processing, compared with intracellular expression. Considering the GRAS status of S. cerevisiae, the supernatant containing collagenases could possibly be used as crude enzyme solution directly and adapted with collagen material processing easily. Therefore, our findings are beneficial for effective utilization of collagen resources.

Materials and methods

Construction of strains and plasmids

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. The protein sequences of ColG (UniProt Entry: Q9X721) and ColH (UniProt Entry: Q46085) were obtained from UniProt database. Corresponding coding DNA sequences for ColG and ColH were codon-optimized and synthesized by GenScript. Standard methods in molecular biology, including PCR, fusion PCR, enzyme digestion, ligation, etc., were used for DNA fragment amplification and plasmid construction [45]. The PCR was performed on a thermal cycler (T100, Bio-Rad, USA) using 2 × Phanta Max Master Mix (Vazyme, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

For construction of plasmids via enzyme digestion and ligation, the CPOTud, a 2-micron plasmid of S. cerevisiae with a copy number of 40–60 per haploid cell, was linearized by Kpn I and Nhe I. Primer pair AF/ARproG, AF/ARWproG, AF/ARG, AF/ARWG, AF/ARproH, AF/ARWproH, AF/ARH, AF/ARWH were used to amplify signal peptide with ColG or ColH homologous arms, using the plasmid pAlphaAmyCPOT as template. Primer pair proGF/GR, WproGF/GR, AGF/GR, WGF/GR, proHF/HR, WproHF/HR, AHF/HR, WHF/HR were used to amplify ColG or ColH chain, using the plasmid pUC57-Mini_G or pUC57-Mini_H as template. Then the signal peptide fragments and the ColG or ColH chains were fused together by overlapping fusion PCR, resulting in gene fragments G01, G02, G03, G04, G05, H01, H02, H03 and H04. Gene fragment G06 was constructed by two rounds of PCR using primer pair PG/GR and AP/GR. Gene fragment G07 was amplified from vector pUC57-Mini_G using primer GF and GR, while H05 was amplified from vector pUC57-Mini_H using primer HF and HR. All of these gene fragments were inserted into CPOTud to construct plasmids pCP_G01, pCP_G02, pCP_G03, pCP_G04, pCP_G05, pCP_G06, pCP_G07, pCP_H01, pCP_H02, pCP_H03, pCP_H04 and pCP_H05. Escherichia coli DH5α was used to construct and propagate recombinant plasmids. Plasmids were introduced into E. coli via the standard heat shock method, and S. cerevisiae via the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method [46].

Media and culture conditions

E. coli DH5α was cultivated in LB medium (5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L tryptone, and 10 g/L NaCl) at 37 ℃, 250 rpm. A final concentration of 100 mg/L ampicillin was supplemented to LB medium for plasmid selection. Yeast strains B184M and CEN.PK 530.1C were cultivated in YPE medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone, 10 g/L ethanol and 0.5 g/L glucose) on a shaker (ZQZY-CF9.9, Shanghai Zhichu Instruments Co., Ltd., China) at 30 ℃, 200 rpm for cell proliferation. Yeast strains transformed with expression plasmids were generally cultivated at 30℃ in YPD medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone, and 20 g/L glucose). For collagenase production, 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.6 mM ZnCl2 were added to YPD medium, and yeast cells were cultivated at 30℃, 200 rpm.

Collagenase activity assay

After being cultivated at 30 ℃ for 96 h, cell cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 3 min. The supernatant was used for extracellular collagenase measurements. Cell pellets were washed twice with distilled water and then resuspended into 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.5). The cell suspension was transferred into a 2-mL tube containing 0.7 g of 0.5-mm glass beads. Cell lysis was processed in a Bioprep-24R homogenizer (Allsheng, China) at 10 °C, 7 m/s for 1 min twice with an interval of 2 min. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant fraction was used for intracellular collagenase quantification.

Collagenase activity measurement was modified from that described by Zhang et al. [47]. Briefly, the substrate gelatin was prepared by dilution with reaction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl with 5 mM CaCl2 and 1 μM ZnCl2, pH = 7.5) to 2 g/L. A 20 μL sample of supernatant was added to 480 μL gelatin solution and the digestion reaction was conducted at 37℃ for 30 min. Quench buffer containing 12% (w/v) PEG 6000 and 25 mM EDTA was used to stop the reaction. For color development, 100 μL diluted reaction solution was mixed with 500 μL ninhydrin reagent and heated at 80℃ for 10 min. Once the tubes were cooled, an additional 600 μL H2O was added and mixed well. The absorbance of reaction mixture was measured at 570 nm with a spectrophotometer. One unit of collagenase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μg glycine per minute under the conditions used.

Halo-plate assays were carried out on plates with YPD medium containing 10 mM CaCl2, 0.6 mM ZnCl2, 1% skimmed milk and 2% agar. Yeast strains were grown on plates with this medium at 30℃ for 4 days and then the plate was incubated at 37℃ for 3 days. Collagenase production was indicated by the formation of clearly visible halos around colonies.

Substrate degradation test

Gelatin degradation: strains were grown in YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2, 0.6 mM ZnCl2 and 1% gelatin at 30 ℃ for 96 h. After cultivation, the supernatant was collected by centrifugation, mixed with SDS-PAGE Sample Loading Buffer and heated at 100℃ for 10 min. Then samples were loaded onto SurePAGE™ PAGE Gel (4–12%) (GenScript, China) and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue after gel electrophoresis.

Collagen degradation: strains were cultivated in YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.6 mM ZnCl2 at 30℃ for 96 h. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation filtered by Amicon® Ultra (30 kDa) and then replaced with 50 mM Tris–Cl buffer (pH = 7.5). Collagen was added to the prepared supernatant solution and inoculated at 37℃ for hydrolysis by collagenases. The collagen fibrils were taken from the incubated tubes after 24 h and placed on silicon wafers to dry naturally before being bonded to the conductive adhesive. They were examined by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at an accelerating voltage of 10.0 kV after gold sputter coating using a Hitachi FESEM SU8220 system (Hitachi, Japan).

Metabolites and cofactors analysis

Strains in seed cultures were grown overnight to reach the late exponential phase. Then seed cultures were inoculated to 50 mL YPD medium with 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.6 mM ZnCl2 with an initial OD600 of 0.005. Samples were taken at different time points for analysis. The concentration of metabolites (glucose, ethanol, glycerol, etc.) in the culture was measured as described by Huang et al. [48]. 20μL supernatant was loaded to an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad, USA) on a Nexera XR HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) and the mobile phase was 5 mM H2SO4 with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min at 45 °C.

Intracellular ATP, NAD(H), NADP(H) and GSH were determined by using ATP assay kit (Cat No. BC0300, Solarbio, China), NAD(H) assay kit (Cat No. BC0310, Solarbio, China), NADP(H) assay kit (Cat No. BC1100, Solarbio, China) and GSH assay kit (Cat No. BC1170, Solarbio, China), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file 1: information files.

References

  1. Henchion M, Hayes M, Mullen AM, Fenelon M, Tiwari B. Future protein supply and demand: strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium. Foods. 2017;6(7):53.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nazer DW, Al-Sa’ed RM, Siebel MA. Reducing the environmental impact of the unhairing–liming process in the leather tanning industry. J Clean Prod. 2006;14(1):65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lemes AC, Egea MB, de Oliveira Filho JG, Gautério GV, Ribeiro BD, Coelho MAZ. Biological approaches for extraction of bioactive compounds from agro-industrial by-products: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;9:802543–802543.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Song Y, Fu Y, Huang S, Liao L, Wu Q, Wang Y, Ge F, Fang B. Identification and antioxidant activity of bovine bone collagen-derived novel peptides prepared by recombinant collagenase from Bacillus cereus. Food Chem. 2021;349: 129143.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirzapour-Kouhdasht A, Moosavi-Nasab M, Yousefi R, Eun J-B. Bio/multi-functional peptides derived from fish gelatin hydrolysates: technological and functional properties. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2021;36: 102152.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mei F, Liu J, Wu J, Duan Z, Chen M, Meng K, Chen S, Shen X, Xia G, Zhao M. Collagen peptides isolated from salmo salar and tilapia nilotica skin accelerate wound healing by altering cutaneous microbiome colonization via upregulated NOD2 and BD14. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(6):1621–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang X, Xiao X, Liu D, Wu R, Wu C, Zhang J, Huang J, Liao B, He H. Optimization of collagenase production by Pseudoalteromonas sp. SJN2 and application of collagenases in the preparation of antioxidative hydrolysates. Mar Drugs. 2017;15(12):377.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrington DJJI. Bacterial collagenases and collagen-degrading enzymes and their potential role in human disease. Infect Immun. 1996;64(6):1885–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duarte AS, Correia A, Esteves AC. Bacterial collagenases—a review. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(1):106–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Warwick D, Arandes-Renu JM, Pajardi G, Witthaut J, Hurst LC. Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum: emerging practice patterns and treatment advances. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50(5):251–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Azmi W, Chauhan S, Gautam M. An overview on therapeutic potential and various applications of microbial collagenases. J Microbiol Biotechnol Res. 2017;7:17–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabrielson AT, Spitz JT, Hellstrom WJG. Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum in the treatment of urologic disease: current and future impact. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2018;6(1):143–56.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bond MD, Van Wart HE. Characterization of the individual collagenases from Clostridium histolyticum. Biochemistry. 1984;23(13):3085–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bond MD, Van Wart HE. Purification and separation of individual collagenases of Clostridium histolyticum using red dye ligand chromatography. Biochemistry. 1984;23(13):3077–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bond MD, Van Wart HE. Relationship between the individual collagenases of Clostridium histolyticum: evidence for evolution by gene duplication. Biochemistry. 1984;23(13):3092–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshihara K, Matsushita O, Minami J, Okabe A. Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the colH gene from Clostridium histolyticum encoding a collagenase and a gelatinase. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(21):6489–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsushita O, Jung C-M, Katayama S, Minami J, Takahashi Y, Okabe A. Gene duplication and multiplicity of collagenases in Clostridium histolyticum. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(3):923–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsushita O, Jung C-M, Minami J, Katayama S, Nishi N, Okabe A. A study of the collagen-binding domain of a 116-kDa Clostridium histolyticum collagenase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(6):3643–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsushita O, Koide T, Kobayashi R, Nagata K, Okabe A. Substrate recognition by the collagen-binding domain of Clostridium histolyticum Class I collagenase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(12):8761–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson P, White S, London N. Collagenase and human islet isolation. Cell Transplant. 1996;5(4):437–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ducka P, Eckhard U, Schonauer E, Kofler S, Gottschalk G, Brandstetter H, Nuss D. A universal strategy for high-yield production of soluble and functional clostridial collagenases in E. coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;83(6):1055–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bertuzzi F, Cuttitta A, Ghersi G, Mazzola S, Salamone M, Seidita G: Clostridium histolyticum recombinant collagenases and method for the manufacture thereof. In.: Google Patents; 2014.

  23. Wang G, Huang M, Nielsen J. Exploring the potential of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for biopharmaceutical protein production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;48:77–84.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang M, Bai Y, Sjostrom SL, Hallstrom BM, Liu Z, Petranovic D, Uhlen M, Joensson HN, Andersson-Svahn H, Nielsen J. Microfluidic screening and whole-genome sequencing identifies mutations associated with improved protein secretion by yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(34):E4689–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eckhard U, Schonauer E, Nuss D, Brandstetter H. Structure of collagenase G reveals a chew-and-digest mechanism of bacterial collagenolysis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18(10):1109–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ohbayashi N, Yamagata N, Goto M, Watanabe K, Yamagata Y, Murayama K. Enhancement of the structural stability of full-length clostridial collagenase by calcium ions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(16):5839.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eckhard U, Schonauer E, Brandstetter H. Structural basis for activity regulation and substrate preference of clostridial collagenases G, H, and T. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(28):20184–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Caviness P, Bauer R, Tanaka K, Janowska K, Roeser JR, Harter D, Sanders J, Ruth C, Matsushita O, Sakon J. Ca2+-induced orientation of tandem collagen binding domains from clostridial collagenase ColG permits two opposing functions of collagen fibril formation and retardation. FEBS J. 2018;285(17):3254–69.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, Liu H, Tang K, Liu J, Li X. Effect of different ions in assisting protease to open the collagen fiber bundles in leather making. J Clean Prod. 2021;293: 126017.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eckhard U, Schönauer E, Ducka P, Briza P, Nüss D, Brandstetter H. Biochemical characterization of the catalytic domains of three different clostridial collagenases. Biol Chem. 2009;390(1):11–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Eder J, Fersht AR. Pro-sequence-assisted protein folding. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16(4):609–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tanaka S, Takeuchi Y, Matsumura H, Koga Y, Takano K, Kanaya S. Crystal structure of Tk-subtilisin folded without propeptide: Requirement of propeptide for acceleration of folding. FEBS Lett. 2008;582(28):3875–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Boon L, Ugarte-Berzal E, Vandooren J, Opdenakker G. Protease propeptide structures, mechanisms of activation, and functions. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;55(2):111–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Overkamp KM, Bakker BM, Kötter P, Luttik MAH, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Metabolic engineering of glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(6):2814–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Da Silva NA, Srikrishnan S. Introduction and expression of genes for metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12(2):197–214.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Blazeck J, Alper HS. Promoter engineering: Recent advances in controlling transcription at the most fundamental level. Biotechnol J. 2013;8(1):46–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bakker BM, Overkamp KM, van Maris AJA, Kötter P, Luttik MAH, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Stoichiometry and compartmentation of NADH metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25(1):15–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Görgens JF, van Zyl WH, Knoetze JH, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Amino acid supplementation improves heterologous protein production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in defined medium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;67(5):684–91.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. van Rensburg E, den Haan R, Smith J, van Zyl WH, Görgens JF. The metabolic burden of cellulase expression by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y294 in aerobic batch culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96(1):197–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tyo KEJ, Liu Z, Petranovic D, Nielsen J. Imbalance of heterologous protein folding and disulfide bond formation rates yields runaway oxidative stress. BMC Biol. 2012;10(1):16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. French MF, Mookhtiar KA, Van Wart HE. Limited proteolysis of type I collagen at hyperreactive sites by class I and II Clostridium histolyticum collagenases: complementary digestion patterns. Biochemistry. 1987;26(3):681–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. French MF, Bhown A, Van Wart HE. Identification of Clostridium histolyticum collagenase hyperreactive sites in type I, II, and III collagens: lack of correlation with local triple helical stability. J Protein Chem. 1992;11(1):83–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Breite AG, McCarthy RC, Dwulet FE. Characterization and functional assessment of Clostridium histolyticum Class I (C1) collagenases and the synergistic degradation of native collagen in enzyme mixtures containing Class II (C2) collagenase. Transplant Proc. 2011;43(9):3171–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bauer R, Janowska K, Taylor K, Jordan B, Gann S, Janowski T, Latimer EC, Matsushita O, Sakon J. Structures of three polycystic kidney disease-like domains from Clostridium histolyticum collagenases ColG and ColH. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2015;71:565–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Green Michael R, Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. Frozen competent yeast cells that can be transformed with high efficiency using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Y, Fu Y, Zhou S, Kang L, Li C. A straightforward ninhydrin-based method for collagenase activity and inhibitor screening of collagenase using spectrophotometry. Anal Biochem. 2013;437(1):46–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Huang M, Bao J, Hallstrom BM, Petranovic D, Nielsen J. Efficient protein production by yeast requires global tuning of metabolism. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China (2020B020226009), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901013) and the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (202002030337).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH and HX conceived and designed the study. HX and XL performed experiments. HX, XL, YF, LZ, MZ and MH analyzed data. MZ and MH supervised the study. HX and MH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingtao Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Optimization of metal ions concentration in culture medium for ColH expression. Figure S2. (A) Biomass and collagenase yield of yeast strains B184M expressing ColG; (B) Biomass and collagenase yield by yeast strains B184M expressing ColH. Figure S3. Collagenase expression under control by different protomers and terminators, which replaced the promoter and terminator on the plasmid pCP_G02. Strain B184M was used as a host strain. Figure S4. Collagenase yield in batch cultivation of strains BG02, BH01 and the control strain B0. Figure S5. Intracellular cofactor level changed in collagenase expression strains. Figure S6. SDS-PAGE analysis of gelatin digestion by recombinant collagenases during cell cultivation. Figure S7. Collagenase activity measurement for the mixture of recombinant ColG and ColH. Figure S8. Differences between recombinant ColG and ColH in collagen degradation were revealed at microscopic structure level by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with 4000× magnification. Table S1. Primers used in this study

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, H., Liu, X., Feng, Y. et al. Secretion of collagenases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae for collagen degradation. Biotechnol Biofuels 15, 89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02186-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02186-y

Keywords

  • Recombinant collagenases
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  • Heterologous expression
  • Collagen degradation
  • Synergistic effect