Lokko Y, Heijde M, Schebesta K, et al. Biotechnology and the bioeconomy—towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development. N Biotechnol. 2018;40:5–10.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Vieira H, Leal MC, Calado R. Fifty shades of blue: how blue biotechnology is shaping the bioeconomy. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:940–3.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Fröhling M, Hiete M. Sustainability and life cycle assessment in industrial biotechnology. 2020.
Escobar N, Laibach N. Sustainability check for bio-based technologies: a review of process-based and life cycle approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;135:110213.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
De Jong E, Stichnothe H, Bell G, et al. Bio-based chemicals: a 2020 update. IEA Bioenergy Task 42 Biorefinery 2020:1–79.
Biddy MJ, Scarlata CJ, Kinchin CM. Chemicals from biomass: a market assessment of bioproducts with near-term potential. 2016. https://doi.org/10.2172/1244312.
Article
Google Scholar
Dahiya S, Katakojwala R, Ramakrishna S, et al. Biobased products and life cycle assessment in the context of circular economy and sustainability. Mater Circ Econ. 2020;2:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42824-020-00007-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Straathof AJJ. Transformation of biomass into commodity chemicals using enzymes or cells. Chem Rev. 2014;114:1871–908.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Takkellapati S, Li T, Gonzalez MA. An overview of biorefinery-derived platform chemicals from a cellulose and hemicellulose biorefinery. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2018;20:1615–30.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Huccetogullari D, Luo ZW, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for production of aromatic compounds. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:1–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Budsberg E, Crawford JT, Morgan H, et al. Hydrocarbon bio-jet fuel from bioconversion of poplar biomass: life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Persson L, Carney Almroth BM, Collins CD, et al. Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:1510–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Galán-Martín Á, Tulus V, Díaz I, et al. Sustainability footprints of a renewable carbon transition for the petrochemical sector within planetary boundaries. One Earth. 2021;4:565–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryberg MW, Owsianiak M, Clavreul J, et al. How to bring absolute sustainability into decision-making: an industry case study using a Planetary Boundary-based methodology. Sci Total Environ. 2018;634:1406–16.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Brandão AS, Gonçalves A, Santos JMRCA. Circular bioeconomy strategies: From scientific research to commercially viable products. J Clean Prod. 2021;295:126407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126407.
Article
Google Scholar
Stewart JJ, Allison PN, Johnson RS. Putting a price on biotechnology many bioentrepreneurs incorrectly estimate the value of their technology by failing to account. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:813–7.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Naeini MA, Zandieh M, Najafi SE, et al. Analyzing the development of the third-generation biodiesel production from microalgae by a novel hybrid decision-making method: the case of Iran. Energy. 2020;195:116895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116895.
Article
Google Scholar
Zheng J, Zhou X, Yu Y, et al. Low carbon, high efficiency and sustainable production of traditional manufacturing methods through process design strategy: Improvement process for sand casting defects. J Clean Prod. 2020;253:119917.
Article
Google Scholar
Buchner GA, Zimmermann AW, Hohgräve AE, et al. Techno-economic assessment framework for the chemical industry—based on technology readiness levels. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:8502–17.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Humbird D. Expanded technology readiness level (TRL) definitions for the bioeconomy. October 1, 2018. 2018:1–7.
de Lorenzo V, Couto J. The important versus the exciting: reining contradictions in contemporary biotechnology. Microb Biotechnol. 2019;12:32–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Linton JD, Xu W. Understanding and managing the biotechnology valley of death. Trends Biotechnol. 2021;39:107–10.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sales JCS, Santos AG, de Castro AM, et al. A critical view on the technology readiness level (TRL) of microbial plastics biodegradation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;37:1–15.
Article
Google Scholar
Dutta K, Daverey A, Lin JG. Evolution retrospective for alternative fuels: first to fourth generation. Renew Energy. 2014;69:114–22.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Chinthapalli R, Skoczinski P, Carus M, et al. Biobased building blocks and polymers—global capacities, production and trends, 2018–2023. Ind Biotechnol. 2019;15:237–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhao X, Liu D. Multi-products co-production improves the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: a case of formiline pretreatment-based biorefining. Appl Energy. 2019;250:229–44.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lu J, Liu Z, Zhang Y, et al. Improved production and quality of biocrude oil from low-lipid high-ash macroalgae Enteromorpha prolifera via addition of crude glycerol. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:749–57.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Li H, Wang M, Wang X, et al. Biogas liquid digestate grown Chlorella sp. for biocrude oil production via hydrothermal liquefaction. Sci Total Environ. 2018;635:70–7.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Agegnehu G, Srivastava AK, Bird MI. The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: a review. Appl Soil Ecol. 2017;119:156–70.
Article
Google Scholar
E4tech, RE-CORD, WUR. From the sugar platform to biofuels and biochemicals. 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/EC_Sugar_Platform_final_report.pdf.
Meramo-Hurtado SI, González-Delgado ÁD. Process synthesis, analysis, and optimization methodologies toward chemical process sustainability. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2021;60:4193–217.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Galbe M, Wallberg O. Pretreatment for biorefineries: a review of common methods for efficient utilisation of lignocellulosic materials. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:1–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Vega GC, Voogt J, Sohn J, et al. Assessing new biotechnologies by combining TEA and TM-LCA for an efficient use of biomass resources. Sustain. 2020;12:3676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093676.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mahmud R, Moni SM, High K, et al. Integration of techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for sustainable process design—a review. J Clean Prod. 2021;317:128247.
Article
Google Scholar
Munagala M, Shastri Y, Nalawade K, et al. Life cycle and economic assessment of sugarcane bagasse valorization to lactic acid. Waste Manag. 2021;126:52–64.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sorunmu Y, Billen P, Spatari S. A review of thermochemical upgrading of pyrolysis bio-oil: techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, and technology readiness. GCB Bioenergy. 2020;12:4–18.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Byun J, Han J. Sustainable development of biorefineries: Integrated assessment method for co-production pathways. Energy Environ Sci. 2020;13:2233–42.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Do TX, Lim YL, Yeo H. Techno-economic analysis of biooil production process from palm empty fruit bunches. Energy Convers Manag. 2014;80:525–34.
Article
Google Scholar
Scown CD, Baral NR, Yang M, et al. Technoeconomic analysis for biofuels and bioproducts. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;67:58–64.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Vural Gursel I, Dijkstra JW, Huijgen WJJ, et al. Techno-economic comparative assessment of novel lignin depolymerization routes to bio-based aromatics. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin. 2019;13:1068–84.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tannous S, Manneh R, Harajli H, et al. Comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of traditional grid-connected and solar stand-alone street light systems: a case study for rural areas in Lebanon. J Clean Prod. 2018;186:963–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Wu W, Lei YC, Chang JS. Life cycle assessment of upgraded microalgae-to-biofuel chains. Bioresour Technol. 2019;288:121492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121492.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sarkar O, Katakojwala R, Venkata MS. Low carbon hydrogen production from a waste-based biorefinery system and environmental sustainability assessment. Green Chem. 2021;23:561–74.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kopsahelis A, Kourmentza C, Zafiri C, et al. Gate-to-gate life cycle assessment of biosurfactants and bioplasticizers production via biotechnological exploitation of fats and waste oils. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2018;93:2833–41.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Leceta I, Guerrero P, Cabezudo S, et al. Environmental assessment of chitosan-based films. J Clean Prod. 2013;41:312–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mahmud N, Rosentrater KA. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) of different pretreatment and product separation technologies for butanol bioprocessing from oil palm frond. Energies. 2019;13:155. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010155.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rajendran K, Murthy GS. How does technology pathway choice influence economic viability and environmental impacts of lignocellulosic biorefineries? Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:1–19.
Article
Google Scholar
Mandegari M, Farzad S, Görgens JF. A new insight into sugarcane biorefineries with fossil fuel co-combustion: techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;165:76–91.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gholkar P, Shastri Y, Tanksale A. Renewable hydrogen and methane production from microalgae: a techno-economic and life cycle assessment study. J Clean Prod. 2021;279:123726.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cucurachi S, Van Der Giesen C, Guinée J. Ex-ante LCA of emerging technologies. Procedia CIRP. 2018;69:463–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Ebrahimi-Moghadam A, Moghadam AJ, Farzaneh-Gord M. Comprehensive techno-economic and environmental sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel heat and power system for natural gas city gate stations. J Clean Prod. 2020;262:121261.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Budsberg E, Morales-Vera R, Crawford JT, et al. Production routes to bio-acetic acid: life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13:1–15.
Article
Google Scholar
Ögmundarson Ó, Sukumara S, Laurent A, et al. Environmental hotspots of lactic acid production systems. GCB Bioenergy. 2020;12:19–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Urban RA, Bakshi BR. 1,3-Propanediol from fossils versus biomass: a life cycle evaluation of emissions and ecological resources. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48:8068–82.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
De Bari I, Giuliano A, Petrone MT, et al. From cardoon lignocellulosic biomass to bio-1,4 butanediol: an integrated biorefinery model. Processes. 2020;8:1–18.
Google Scholar
Forte A, Zucaro A, Basosi R, et al. LCA of 1,4-butanediol produced via direct fermentation of sugars from wheat straw feedstock within a territorial biorefinery. Materials (Basel). 2016;9:1–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Alonso-Fariñas B, Gallego-Schmid A, Haro P, et al. Environmental assessment of thermo-chemical processes for bio-ethylene production in comparison with bio-chemical and fossil-based ethylene. J Clean Prod. 2018;202:817–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Nachtergaele P, De Meester S, Dewulf J. Environmental sustainability assessment of renewables-based propylene glycol at full industrial scale production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2019;94:1808–15.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zhao Z, Jiang J, Zheng M, et al. Advancing development of biochemicals through the comprehensive evaluation of bio-ethylene glycol. Chem Eng J. 2021;411: 128516.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Thompson MA, Mohajeri A, Mirkouei A. Comparison of pyrolysis and hydrolysis processes for furfural production from sugar beet pulp: a case study in southern Idaho, USA. J Clean Prod. 2021;311:127695.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Moreno J, Iglesias J, Blanco J, et al. Life-cycle sustainability of biomass-derived sorbitol: proposing technological alternatives for improving the environmental profile of a bio-refinery platform molecule. J Clean Prod. 2020;250:119568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119568.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Moussa HI, Elkamel A, Young SB. Assessing energy performance of bio-based succinic acid production using LCA. J Clean Prod. 2016;139:761–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Isoni V, Kumbang D, Sharratt PN, et al. Biomass to levulinic acid: a techno-economic analysis and sustainability of biorefinery processes in Southeast Asia. J Environ Manage. 2018;214:267–75.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Adom F, Dunn J. Life cycle analysis of corn- stover- derived polymer-grade l-lactic acid and ethyl lactate: greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy consumption. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin. 2016;11:258–68.
Article
Google Scholar
Câmara-Salim I, González-García S, Feijoo G, et al. Screening the environmental sustainability of microbial production of butyric acid produced from lignocellulosic waste streams. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;162:113280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113280.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rauch S, Piepenbreier F, Voss D, et al. LCA in process development: case study of the OxFA-process. In: Herrmann C, Kara S, editors., et al., Progress in Life Cycle Assessment. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 105–13.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Lam CM, Yu IKM, Hsu SC, et al. Life-cycle assessment on food waste valorisation to value-added products. J Clean Prod. 2018;199:840–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bello S, Salim I, Méndez-Trelles P, et al. Environmental sustainability assessment of HMF and FDCA production from lignocellulosic biomass through life cycle assessment (LCA). Holzforschung. 2019;73:105–15.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Aryapratama R, Janssen M. Prospective life cycle assessment of bio-based adipic acid production from forest residues. J Clean Prod. 2017;164:434–43.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Michailos S, Parker D, Webb C. A multicriteria comparison of utilizing sugar cane bagasse for methanol to gasoline and butanol production. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016;95:436–48.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Santibañez-Aguilar JE, González-Campos JB, Ponce-Ortega JM, et al. Optimal planning of a biomass conversion system considering economic and environmental aspects. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:8558–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Chin HH, Foo DCY, Lam HL. Simultaneous water and energy integration with isothermal and non-isothermal mixing–a P-graph approach. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;149:687–713.
Article
Google Scholar
Costa CBB, Potrich E, Cruz AJG. Multiobjective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery involving process and environmental aspects. Renew Energy. 2016;96:1142–52.
Article
Google Scholar
Bonatsos N, Marazioti C, Moutousidi E, et al. Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of heterotrophic yeast-derived single cell oil production process. Fuel. 2020;264:116839.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wu N, Lan K, Yao Y. An integrated techno-economic and environmental assessment for carbon capture in hydrogen production by biomass gasification. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2022;188:106693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106693.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ahmadi L, Kannangara M, Bensebaa F. Cost-effectiveness of small scale biomass supply chain and bioenergy production systems in carbon credit markets: a life cycle perspective. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2020;37:100627.
Google Scholar
Wunderlich J, Armstrong K, Buchner GA, et al. Integration of techno-economic and life cycle assessment: defining and applying integration types for chemical technology development. J Clean Prod. 2021;287:125021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125021.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ögmundarson Ó, Sukumara S, Herrgård MJ, et al. Combining environmental and economic performance for bioprocess optimization. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:1203–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Thomassen G, Van Dael M, Van Passel S. The potential of microalgae biorefineries in Belgium and India: an environmental techno-economic assessment. Bioresour Technol. 2018;267:271–80.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Verma A, Olateju B, Kumar A. Greenhouse gas abatement costs of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification. Energy. 2015;85:556–68.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sikdar SK, Sengupta D, Harten P. More on aggregating multiple indicators into a single index for sustainability analyses. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2012;14:765–73.
Article
Google Scholar
Ruiz-Mercado GJ, Smith RL, Gonzalez MA. Sustainability indicators for chemical processes: I. Taxonomy. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;51:2309–28.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
El-Halwagi MM. A return on investment metric for incorporating sustainability in process integration and improvement projects. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2017;19:611–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Guillen-Cuevas K, Ortiz-Espinoza AP, Ozinan E, et al. Incorporation of safety and sustainability in conceptual design via a return on investment metric. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6:1411–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Meramo-Hurtado SI, González-Delgado ÁD. Aggregate/weighted global sustainability and exergy metric for assessing emerging transformation technologies. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8:16637–46.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
García-Casas M, Gálvez-Martos JL, Dufour J. Environmental and economic multi-objective optimisation of synthetic fuels production via an integrated methodology based on process simulation. Comput Chem Eng. 2022;157:107624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107624.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wang B, Gebreslassie BH, You F. Sustainable design and synthesis of hydrocarbon biorefinery via gasification pathway: integrated life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis with multiobjective superstructure optimization. Comput Chem Eng. 2013;52:55–76.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
AlNouss A, McKay G, Al-Ansari T. A techno-economic-environmental study evaluating the potential of oxygen-steam biomass gasification for the generation of value-added products. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;196:664–76.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kern JD, Hise AM, Characklis GW, et al. Using life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis in a real options framework to inform the design of algal biofuel production facilities. Bioresour Technol. 2017;225:418–28.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Halog A, Manik Y. Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability. 2011;3:469–99.
Article
Google Scholar
Croxatto Vega G, Sohn J, Voogt J, et al. Insights from combining techno-economic and life cycle assessment—a case study of polyphenol extraction from red wine pomace. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021;167:1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Ong MS, Chang MY, Foong MJ, et al. An integrated approach for sustainability assessment with hybrid AHP-LCA-PI techniques for chitosan-based TiO2 nanotubes production. Sustain Prod Consum. 2020;21:170–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Carnegie Mellon University. CMU—Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment. 2018. http://www.eiolca.net/. Accessed 15 July 2021.
Gargalo CL, Carvalho A, Gernaey KV, et al. Optimal design and planning of glycerol-based biorefinery supply chains under uncertainty. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017;56:11870–93.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Moreno-Sader K, Jain P, Tenorio LCB, et al. Integrated approach of safety, sustainability, reliability, and resilience analysis via a return on investment metric. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:19522–36.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tock L, Maréchal F, Perrenoud M. Thermo-environomic evaluation of the ammonia production. Can J Chem Eng. 2015;93:356–62.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Li Y, Bhagwat SS, Cortés-Penã YR, et al. Sustainable lactic acid production from lignocellulosic biomass. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9:1341–51.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tang Y, You F. Multicriteria environmental and economic analysis of municipal solid waste incineration power plant with carbon capture and separation from the life-cycle perspective. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6:937–56.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zhao N, Lehmann J, You F. Poultry waste valorization via pyrolysis technologies: economic and environmental life cycle optimization for sustainable bioenergy systems. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8:4633–46.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lu HR, El Hanandeh A. Life cycle perspective of bio-oil and biochar production from hardwood biomass; what is the optimum mix and what to do with it? J Clean Prod. 2019;212:173–89.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gan X, Fernandez IC, Guo J, et al. When to use what: methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. Ecol Indic. 2017;81:491–502.
Article
Google Scholar
Valente C, Møller H, Johnsen FM, et al. Life cycle sustainability assessment of a novel slaughter concept. J Clean Prod. 2020;272:122651.
Article
Google Scholar
Pask F, Lake P, Yang A, et al. Sustainability indicators for industrial ovens and assessment using Fuzzy set theory and Monte Carlo simulation. J Clean Prod. 2017;140:1217–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Telsnig T, Tomaschek J, Doruk E, et al. Assessment of selected CCS technologies in electricity and synthetic fuel production for CO2 mitigation in South Africa. Energy Policy. 2013;63:168–80.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Parra D, Zhang X, Bauer C, et al. An integrated techno-economic and life cycle environmental assessment of power-to-gas systems. Appl Energy. 2017;193:440–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Man Y, Yang S, Xiang D, et al. Environmental impact and techno-economic analysis of the coal gasification process with/without CO2 capture. J Clean Prod. 2014;71:59–66.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ögmundarson Ó, Herrgård MJ, Forster J, et al. Addressing environmental sustainability of biochemicals. Nat Sustain. 2020;3:167–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Fantke P, Illner N. Goods that are good enough: Introducing an absolute sustainability perspective for managing chemicals in consumer products. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2019;15:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.12.001.
Article
Google Scholar
Chauvy R, Dubois L. Life cycle and techno-economic assessments of direct air capture processes: an integrated review. Int J Energy Res. 2022;46:10320–44.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mirkouei A, Haapala KR, Sessions J, et al. A review and future directions in techno-economic modeling and optimization of upstream forest biomass to bio-oil supply chains. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;67:15–35.
Article
Google Scholar
Mukherjee R, Sengupta D, Sikdar SK. Sustainability in the context of process engineering. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2015;17:833–40.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cruce JR, Beattie A, Chen P, et al. Driving toward sustainable algal fuels: a harmonization of techno-economic and life cycle assessments. Algal Res. 2021;54:102169.
Article
Google Scholar
Wu W, Chang JS. Integrated algal biorefineries from process systems engineering aspects: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2019;291:121939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121939.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Meramo-Hurtado S-I, González-Delgado Á-D. Biorefinery synthesis and design using sustainability parameters and hierarchical/3D multi-objective optimization. J Clean Prod. 2019;240:118134.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Thomassen G, Van Dael M, Van Passel S, et al. How to assess the potential of emerging green technologies? Towards a prospective environmental and techno-economic assessment framework. Green Chem. 2019;21:4868–86.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Solarte-Toro JC, Ortiz-Sanchez M, Cardona Alzate CA. Environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA) and social impact assessment (SIA) of small-scale biorefineries implemented in rural zones: the avocado (Persea Americana var. Americana) case in Colombia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20857-z.
Article
Google Scholar
Azapagic A, Millington A, Collett A. A methodology for integrating sustainability considerations into process design. Chem Eng Res Des. 2006;84:439–52.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Santoyo-Castelazo E, Azapagic A. Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. J Clean Prod. 2014;80:119–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Ruiz-Mercado GJ, Carvalho A, Cabezas H. Using green chemistry and engineering principles to design, assess, and retrofit chemical processes for sustainability. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016;4:6208–21.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, et al. Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability. 2010;2:3309–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Hoogmartens R, Van Passel S, Van Acker K, et al. Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2014;48:27–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Hauschild MZ, McKone TE, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, et al. Risk and sustainability: trade-offs and synergies for robust decision making. Environ Sci Eur. 2022;34:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00587-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen Q, Grossmann IE. Recent developments and challenges in optimization-based process synthesis. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2017;8:249–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-033546.
Article
Google Scholar
Azapagic A, Clift R. The application of life cycle assessment to process optimisation. Comput Chem Eng. 1999;23:1509–26.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Grossmann IE, Apap RM, Calfa BA, et al. Mathematical programming techniques for optimization under uncertainty and their application in process systems engineering. Theor Found Chem Eng. 2017;51:893–909.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
El-Halwagi AM, Rosas C, Ponce-Ortega JM, et al. Multiobjective optimization of biorefineries with economic and safety objectives. AIChE J. 2013;59:2427–34.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ceballos B, Lamata MT, Pelta DA. A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Prog Artif Intell. 2016;5:315–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Hesser F, Wohner B, Meints T, et al. Integration of LCA in R&D by applying the concept of payback period: case study of a modified multilayer wood parquet. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2017;22:307–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Sandin G, Clancy G, Heimersson S, et al. Making the most of LCA in technical inter-organisational R&D projects. J Clean Prod. 2014;70:97–104.
Article
Google Scholar
Moni SM, Mahmud R, High K, et al. Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: a review. J Ind Ecol. 2020;24:52–63.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
European Commission. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL). Horiz 2020—Work Program 2014–2015 Gen Annex Extr from Part 19—Comm Decis C. 2014; 1.
Dickson R, Mancini E, Garg N, et al. Sustainable bio-succinic acid production: superstructure optimization, techno-economic, and lifecycle assessment. Energy Environ Sci. 2021;14:3542–58.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cok B, Tsiropoulos I, Roes A, et al. Succinic acid production derived from carbohydrates: an energy and greenhouse gas assessment of a platform chemical toward a bio-based economy. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin. 2014;8:16–29.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Giuliano A, Cerulli R, Poletto M, et al. Process pathways optimization for a lignocellulosic biorefinery producing levulinic acid, succinic acid, and ethanol. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016;55:10699–717.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Arias A, González-García S, González-Rodríguez S, et al. Cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment of bio-adhesives for the wood panel industry. A comparison with petrochemical alternatives. Sci Total Environ. 2020;738:140357.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Meramo S, Sukumara S. Environmental and economic assessment of bio-succinic acid production. Mendeley Data 2021. https://doi.org/10.17632/X7FVW5DS5V.1.
Article
Google Scholar
Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, et al. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2017;22:138–47.
Article
Google Scholar
Plastina A. Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa—2016. Ame; 2021.
Denicoff MR, Prater ME, Bahizi P. Corn transportation profile. Agric Mark Serv. 2014; 1–13.
IHS Markit. Chemical Process Economics Program. 2017. https://ihsmarkit.com/products/chemical-technology-pep-index.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2021.
Center for Transportation Research and Education. Iowa’s renewable energy and infrastructure impacts. Ames; 2010.
ISO. ISO 14044:2006—Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html. Accessed 9 Aug 2021.
Shaji A, Shastri Y, Kumar V, et al. Economic and environmental assessment of succinic acid production from sugarcane bagasse. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9:12738–46.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
European Commission. ILCD handbook. 1st edn. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010. https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ilcd.html.
Google Scholar
Ordouei MH, Elkamel A. New composite sustainability indices for Cradle-to-Cradle process design: case study on thinner recovery from waste paint in auto industries. J Clean Prod. 2017;166:253–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Pawelzik P, Carus M, Hotchkiss J, et al. Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials—reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2013;73:211–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Liu Y, Lyu Y, Tian J, et al. Review of waste biorefinery development towards a circular economy: from the perspective of a life cycle assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;139:110716.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Arendt R, Bachmann TM, Motoshita M, et al. Comparison of different monetization methods in LCA: a review. Sustain. 2020;12:1–39.
Google Scholar
Paras MK, Pal R. Application of Markov chain for LCA: a study on the clothes ‘reuse’ in Nordic countries. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;94:191–201.
Article
Google Scholar
Pasha MK, Dai L, Liu D, et al. An overview to process design, simulation and sustainability evaluation of biodiesel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14:1–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Abdella GM, Kucukvar M, Onat NC, et al. Sustainability assessment and modeling based on supervised machine learning techniques: the case for food consumption. J Clean Prod. 2020;251:119661.
Article
Google Scholar