Skip to main content
Download PDF

Integrated microbiology and metabolomic analysis reveal the improvement of rice straw silage quality by inoculation of Lactobacillus brevis

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts volume 16, Article number: 184 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ensiling technology holds promise for preserving and providing high-quality forage. However, the preservation of rice straw poses challenges due to its high lignocellulosic content and low water-soluble carbohydrate levels. Developing highly effective lactic acid bacteria (LAB) for rice straw silage remains a priority.

Results

This study evaluated the impact of three LAB strains, Lactobacillus brevis R33 (Lac33), L. buchneri R17 (Lac17), and Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides (Leu), on the fermentation quality of rice straw silage. Rice straw silage inoculated with Lac33 alone or in combination with other strains exhibited significantly lower neutral detergent fiber (NDF) (66.5% vs. 72.3%) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) (42.1% vs. 47%) contents, along with higher lactic acid (19.4 g/kg vs. not detected) and propionic acid (2.09 g/kg vs. 1.54 g/kg) contents compared to control silage. Bacterial community analysis revealed Lactobacillus dominance (> 80%) and suppression of unwanted Enterobacter and Clostridium. Metabolomic analysis highlighted increased carbohydrates and essential amino acids, indicating improved nutrient values in Lac33-inoculated rice straw silage and a potential explanation for Lac33 dominance.

Conclusions

This research identified a highly efficient LAB candidate for rice straw silage, advancing our comprehension of fermentation from integrated microbiology and metabolomic perspectives.

Introduction

Rice, a staple crop that feeds over 50% of the global population, generates a substantial amount of rice straw, which is often ineffectively disposed of, leading to environmental pollution [1, 2]. Utilizing rice straw in livestock production can mitigate this issue and alleviate feed scarcity. However, its high fiber, lignin, and silica content, along with low water-soluble carbohydrate levels, hinder digestion and reduce its nutritive value for ruminants [3].

Various treatments have been attempted to enhance the digestibility of rice straw, including physical and chemical methods [4]. Nevertheless, the drawbacks of these treatments limit their widespread application [5]. Ensiling, a preservation technique that yields high-quality forage for ruminants, offers a potential solution [6]. Ensilage retains more than 90% of plant energy and improves the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis when compared to raw material [7].

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), known for their ability to lower pH and inhibit undesirable microorganisms, have been extensively utilized to enhance the fermentation process and improve the nutrient value of rice straw silage [8]. LAB strains associated with silage predominantly belong to the bacterial genera Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus [4]. For example, L. plantarum, a homofermentative strain producing lactic acid rapidly, has been shown to increase in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) while having no effect on neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents of rice straw silage [9]. Due to the challenge of ensiling rice straw with LAB, and the potential proliferation of undesirable microorganisms owing to its high lignocellulosic content and low water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content [10, 11], researchers have explored the addition of high WSC products such as molasses and other high-moisture feed to improve LAB colonization efficiency [11,12,13]. Additional strategies, including the addition of cellulase in conjunction with LAB or the creation of genetically engineered LAB strains with cellulase genes, have also been investigated [14, 15]. Given the current state of research on rice straw silage, the development of highly effective LAB capable of thriving in low WSC conditions and reducing NDF and ADF contents in rice straw silage remains an ongoing challenge. Furthermore, previous studies have primarily focused on traditional chemical indicators of silage, such as NDF, ADF, and specific acids, while comprehensive and detailed characterization of rice straw silage using metabolomic analysis has been limited.

In this study, two LAB strains (L. brevis R33 and Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides) that exhibit cellulase-producing capabilities were isolated from oats silage. The effects of these strains and another previously isolated LAB strain (L. buchneri R17) on the chemical composition, bacterial communities, and metabolite profiles of rice straw silage were investigated. This study not only identifies a new and potentially effective LAB candidate for rice straw silage but also offers new insights into the role of LAB in enhancing the quality of rice straw silage, from both microbiological and metabolomic perspectives.

Results and discussion

Chemical composition and fermentation quality of rice straw silage with inoculation of different strains

To discern the influence of different strains on the chemical composition of rice straw silage, an initial assessment of its composition was conducted. Notably, samples inoculated solely with Leu or Lac17 demonstrated comparable Dry Matter Loss (DML) to control treatments, whereas samples receiving a combined inoculation of Leu and Lac17 exhibited lower DML than the control (Fig. 1a). Remarkably, inoculation with Lac33, whether alone or in combination with other strains, led to a significant reduction in DML, nearly tripling the efficacy (Fig. 1a). Conversely, neither Total Carbon (TC) nor crude protein content was affected by strain inoculation (Fig. 1a and Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Whereas inoculation with Leu, Lac17, and their combination had no discernible impact on Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) contents, inoculation with Lac33 yielded a substantial decrease in both NDF (from 72.3% to 66.5%) and ADF (from 47% to 42.1%) contents (Fig. 1a). Moreover, Lac33 inoculation exhibited a marginal but non-significant reduction in Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) content (Fig. 1a). The improved fiber content resulting from Lac33 inoculation can be attributed to the potential degradation of crude fiber facilitated by enzyme activities such as endoglucanase, exoglucanase, and β-glucosidase associated with Lac33 (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Lac33 inoculation also led to a significant enhancement in In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility (IVDMD), particularly over 72 h (Fig. 1b). However, co-inoculation with other strains seemed to marginally attenuate the efficiency of Lac33. Given the recalcitrance of lignocellulosic structure, the reduction of fiber content in silage can alleviate intake and digestibility limitations in livestock [16], thus contributing to an improved nutritional value.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chemical characteristics of rice straw silage with different strain inoculations. The symbols and error bars represent the mean value and standard deviation of six biological replicates, respectively. Distinct letters on top indicate significant differences across all combinations (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test, P < 0.05). Dashed rectangles in red and blue depict groups inoculated without Lac33 and with Lac33, respectively. Abbreviations: CK, no inoculation; LB, inoculated with LB; Leu, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides; Lac17, inoculated with L. buchneri R17; Leu + Lac17, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. buchneri R17; Lac33, inoculated with L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. brevis R33; Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. buchneri R17 and L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides, L. buchneri R17, and L. brevis R33. DML, dry matter loss; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ADL, acid detergent lignin; IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility

Full size image

The pH values of the silage decreased from 4.95 to 4.81 and 4.83 with the inoculation of Lac17 and the combination of Lac17 and Leu, respectively. In contrast, Lac33 inoculation led to a significant pH reduction from 4.95 to 4.2 (Fig. 1b). In parallel with the lowered pH, Lac33 inoculation substantially elevated lactic acid content from undetectable levels to 19.4 g/kg, while also increasing propionic acid content from 1.54 g/kg to 2.09 g/kg (Fig. 1c). The acetic acid content remained unaffected by strain inoculation (Fig. 1c). The presence of high levels of lactic and propionic acids can effectively lower pH and deter undesired bacterial growth during fermentation [8, 17]. Furthermore, Lac33 inoculation resulted in a notable decrease in butyric acid content from 19.7 g/kg to undetectable levels (Fig. 1c). Butyric acid, produced primarily by Clostridia, can manifest in under-fermented silage, signifying dry matter loss, energy inefficiency, and potential livestock health concerns [18]. Lac33's suppression of butyric acid production can be attributed to the inhibition of Clostridia. The high levels of ammonia-N in silage often indicate excessive protein degradation during fermentation [19]. However, the ratio of NH4+-N/TN was significantly reduced from 6.6% to 2.2% by Lac33 inoculation alone or in combination with other strains (Fig. 1c). This decrease can be attributed to the rapid pH decline that hampers specific microbial growth and plant enzyme activity, subsequently curbing protein degradation [6]. In summary, the elevation of lactic and propionic acids coupled with the reduction of butyric acid and ammonia-N collectively contribute to the heightened quality of rice straw silage with Lac33 inoculation.

Effects of inoculation of different strains on the bacterial communities of rice straw silage

To probe the influence of distinct strain inoculations on rice straw silage bacterial communities, we conducted principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) on the bacterial compositions of silage treated with various strains. The PCoA plots unveiled discernible differences between the treatments, wherein the rice silage samples were distinctly partitioned along the first principal coordinate into two groups: with and without Lac33 (Fig. 2a and Additional file 1: Table S1). This disparity indicated that the introduction of Lac33 significantly altered the bacterial community compositions within the rice silage. Furthermore, the Shannon indices of rice silage samples with Lac33 exhibited a notable reduction compared to those without Lac33 (Fig. 2b). This phenomenon could be attributed to the decreased pH levels that could potentially impede the growth of diverse bacterial species [20].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis of bacterial communities in rice straw silage with various strain inoculations. a Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of bacterial communities in rice straw silage inoculated with different strains. The 95% confidence ellipses are depicted in respective colors for diverse communities. Dashed circles in blue and red signify groups inoculated without Lac33 and with Lac33, respectively. b Shannon indices of different samples. Boxplots indicate median, 25th and 75th percentiles, while error bars represent standard deviations of three replicates. c Relative abundance of phylum and d genus in bacterial communities of distinct silage samples. CK, no inoculation; LB, inoculated with LB; Leu, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides; Lac17, inoculated with L. buchneri R17; Leu + Lac17, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. buchneri R17; Lac33, inoculated with L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. brevis R33; Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. buchneri R17 and L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides, L. buchneri R17, and L. brevis R33

Full size image

The taxonomic compositions of silage bacterial communities were subsequently explored at both the phylum and genus levels. In the absence of Lac33 inoculation, Proteobacteria stood as the most abundant phylum, constituting over 60% of the entire community. Conversely, Lac33 inoculation induced a dominance of Firmicutes, accounting for over 80% of the community (Fig. 2c). Additionally, the relative abundances of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were higher in samples with Lac33 than those without (Fig. 2c). Notably, the restraint of Proteobacteria, known for its capability to degrade organic matter in anaerobic environments, by Lac33 inoculation might elucidate the diminished dry matter (DM) loss during fermentation [21]. Further granularity emerged from the genus-level distribution of bacteria, yielding insights into community changes. Silage samples lacking Lac33 exhibited elevated bacterial diversity, mirroring the higher Shannon indices observed (Fig. 2b). The top five dominant genera in these samples were Kosakonia (11.5–34.5%), Enterobacter (12.3–26.9%), Enterococcus (8.6–20.1%), Lactobacillus (4.9–18.4%), and Pantoea (1.7–10.2%) (Fig. 2d). In stark contrast, Lactobacillus dominated the entirety of the bacterial communities in silage samples with Lac33 (83.9%-85.3%) (Fig. 2d). Well-established as a representative of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), Lactobacillus assumes a pivotal role in generating substantial lactic acid quantities and reducing pH levels, consequently establishing dominance in higher-quality silages [22].

To comprehensively assess the dynamics of enrichment and depletion of specific bacteria, we employed a Manhattan plot approach. Examination of these plots revealed that ASVs that were enriched (133 ASVs) or depleted (114 ASVs) in the comparison between Lac33-inoculated and non-inoculated samples predominantly belonged to four phyla: Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria (Fig. 3a). Most notably, the ASV that exhibited the most substantial enrichment in Lac33-inoculated samples was identified as Lactobacillus brevis, underscoring the successful colonization and thriving of the introduced L. brevis R33 throughout fermentation, culminating in its dominance within the final bacterial communities of the silage (Fig. 3a). A concise overview of enriched ASVs unveiled that Sphingomonas (13 ASVs), Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium (12 ASVs), Lactobacillus (10 ASVs), and Stenotrophomonas (8 ASVs) emerged as the most enriched genera within Lac33-inoculated samples. Earlier studies have reported the ascendancy of Stenotrophomonas in mixed silage composed of alfalfa, rice straw, and wheat bran following 45 days of fermentation [23], while Sphingomonas has been identified as a favored genus in sweet sorghum silage [24]. Notably, the increased presence of Lactobacillus aligns with its pivotal role within the final bacterial communities of silage samples treated with Lac33.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Taxonomic characterization of differential bacterial taxa between silage groups with and without L. brevis R33 inoculation. a Manhattan plots display ASVs enriched or depleted between bacterial communities of silage groups with and without L. brevis R33 inoculation. Specific ASVs are labeled with corresponding species, genus, or family. Filled triangles represent enriched ASVs, empty triangles signify depleted ASVs, and filled circles denote non-significant comparisons (FDR-adjusted P < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Triangle and circle sizes are proportionate to ASV relative abundances. b Analysis of enriched and depleted ASVs summarized and displayed at the genus level. Abbreviations: CK, no inoculation; LB, inoculated with LB; Leu, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides; Lac17, inoculated with L. buchneri R17; Leu + Lac17, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. buchneri R17; Lac33, inoculated with L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. brevis R33; Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. buchneri R17 and L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides, L. buchneri R17, and L. brevis R33

Full size image

Furthermore, examination of significantly depleted ASVs in Lac33-inoculated samples revealed associations with the genera Caproiciproducens, Clostridium, and Enterococcus-phylum Firmicutes, and Enterobacter and Enterobacteriaceae (at the family level)-phylum Proteobacteria (Fig. 3a). The summary of depleted ASVs underscored that Enterobacter (16 ASVs), Enterococcus (13 ASVs), Clostridium (12 ASVs), and Caproiciproducens (9 ASVs) were the most significantly depleted genera (Fig. 3b). Enterococcus, recognized as one of the typical LAB [4] (Oladosu et al.), has been reported by Bai et al. [25] to exhibit reduced abundance upon Lactobacillus inoculation. In our study, the decline in Enterococcus could potentially stem from competition with Lactobacillus. It is worthwhile noting that Caproiciproducens and Clostridium, which are capable of producing carbon dioxide and butyric acid while competing with Lactobacillus under anaerobic conditions, have been associated with compromised fermentation quality and reduced feeding value in silage [26, 27]. Their depletion may also account for the complete inhibition of butyric acid production in Lac33-inoculated samples (Fig. 1c). Enterobacter, recognized for deaminating and decarboxylating certain amino acids, thereby producing ammonia and biogenic amines that reduce nutritional value and palatability of silage [5, 18], is widely considered an undesirable microbe in silage [28]. The decrease in Enterobacter abundance aligns with the diminished deamination activity, represented by the lowered ammonia-N content in Lac33-inoculated samples (Fig. 1c). The prompt pH decrease, inhibiting the growth of these detrimental microbes [4], is likely attributable to the lactic acid produced by L. brevis R33, potentially driving the reduction in their abundance. In summary, the inoculation of L. brevis R33 serves as a significant contributor to the enhancement of fermentation quality in rice straw silage, as evidenced by the enrichment of beneficial microbial populations and the reduction of undesirable ones.

Effects of inoculation of different strains on the metabolite profiles of rice straw silage

To delve deeper into the metabolic consequences of different strain inoculations, we conducted a metabolomic analysis of rice straw silage. Given the observed shifts in bacterial communities due to Lac33 inoculation, we anticipated concurrent changes in the metabolite profiles. As expected, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the metabolite profiles distinctly grouped Lac33-inoculated and non-inoculated samples, indicating distinct metabolite profiles due to Lac33 inoculation (Fig. 4a and Additional file 1: Table S2). A total of 2224 metabolites were identified, predominantly spanning 10 categories, and their relative abundances diverged between the two groups (Fig. 4b and Additional file 2). Notably, “lipids and lipid-like molecules” and “organic acids and derivatives” emerged as the most abundant categories, collectively constituting over 60% of the total metabolite abundance. Intriguingly, samples lacking Lac33 exhibited higher abundance of “lipids and lipid-like molecules” (46.6%) compared to samples with Lac33 (37.5%). In contrast, “organic acids and derivatives” were more abundant in Lac33-treated samples (24.3%) compared to non-Lac33 samples (20.3%) (Fig. 4b). Additionally, other categories such as “organoheterocyclic compounds”, “organic nitrogen compounds”, “phenylpropanoids and polyketides”, “organic oxygen compounds”, and “nucleosides, nucleotides, and analogues” also exhibited higher abundance in Lac33-inoculated samples (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Metabolite analysis of rice straw silage with various strain inoculations. a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of metabolite profiles in rice straw silage with different strain inoculations. The 95% confidence ellipses are shown in respective colors for distinct communities. Dashed circles in blue and red signify groups inoculated without Lac33 and with Lac33, respectively. b Relative abundance of metabolite categories in silage groups with and without L. brevis R33 inoculation. Metabolites classified into different groups and labeled accordingly. c Volcano plots illustrate metabolites up or down-regulated between silage groups without and with L. brevis R33 inoculation. Dashed lines represent fold change (FC > 2 and < -2) and P-value (P < 0.05) thresholds. d Analysis of up and downregulated metabolites summarized and displayed at the subclass level. Abbreviations: CK, no inoculation; LB, inoculated with LB; Leu, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides; Lac17, inoculated with L. buchneri R17; Leu + Lac17, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. buchneri R17; Lac33, inoculated with L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides and L. brevis R33; Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. buchneri R17 and L. brevis R33; Leu + Lac17 + 33, inoculated with L. pseudomesenteroides, L. buchneri R17, and L. brevis R33

Full size image

To comprehend the impact of Lac33 inoculation, we examined up and downregulated metabolites through Volcano plot analysis. This analysis revealed that among the 2224 metabolites, 426 (19.2%) were upregulated, and 192 (8.6%) were down-regulated upon Lac33 inoculation. The upregulated metabolites were primarily associated with the subcategories of “amino acids, peptides, and analogues” (29.3%, 125/426), “carbohydrates and carbohydrate conjugates” (9.7%, 37/426), and “flavonoid glycosides” (2.6%, 11/426) (Fig. 4d). The increased abundance of amino acids and carbohydrates, stemming from the breakdown of complex molecules such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, could potentially offer additional nitrogen and carbon resources to fermenting microbes, notably Lactobacillus, enhancing lactic acid production [29, 30]. Moreover, higher amino acid and carbohydrate content in rice straw silage can render it more digestible for ruminant animals [31, 32]. Intriguingly, the abundance of ferulic acid, released through the hydrolysis of lignin-linking bonds by ferulic acid esterase [33], was markedly elevated in Lac33-inoculated silage samples, potentially augmenting silage degradability and nutritive value (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). This elevation might be indicative of increased ferulic acid esterase activity, which merits further investigation. The augmented abundance of flavonoids, known for their anti-biohydrogenation and antioxidant properties in silage [34], further suggests their contribution to enhanced silage quality. On the flip side, certain metabolites from subcategories such as “amino acids, peptides, and analogues” (22.4%, 43/192) and “fatty acids and conjugates” (5.7%, 11/192) were downregulated in Lac33-inoculated samples (Fig. 4d). This could be attributed to the dominance of Lactobacillus, which could inhibit the activity of other microbes such as Clostridium, thus impacting specific fatty acid synthesis, including butyric acid [12].

To elucidate the specific pathways affected by L. brevis R33 inoculation, we conducted a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of metabolites. Results revealed the involvement of diverse pathways, encompassing “amino acid metabolism”, “carbohydrate metabolism”, “energy metabolism”, and “membrane transport” (Fig. 4a). While some amino acid metabolism pathways exhibited negative differential abundance scores, other pathways exhibited positive scores, indicating a prevalence of upregulated metabolites within these pathways (Fig. 5a). These findings corresponded to the increased amino acid and carbohydrate abundances (Fig. 4d). Among the essential amino acids identified in amino acid metabolism pathways, six—L-lysine, histidine, phenylalanine, DL-threonine, L-methionine, and L-leucine—exhibited higher abundance in Lac33-inoculated samples (Fig. 5b), highlighting the enhanced nutrient value of Lac33-inoculated rice straw silage for ruminants [35, 36]. Remarkably, the “ABC transporters” pathway, responsible for metabolite transport in microbes [37], displayed upregulation in Lac33-inoculated samples, suggesting an augmented supply of metabolites as vital energy sources to support other metabolic pathways.

Fig. 5
figure 5

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites between silage groups with and without L. brevis R33 inoculation. a Differential abundance scores of KEGG pathways between silage groups with and without L. brevis R33 inoculation. Pathway size corresponds to differential metabolite counts. Differential abundance scores: 1 signifies upregulated differential metabolites; -1 represents downregulated differential metabolites. b Abundance of specific amino acids in silage groups with and without L. brevis R33 inoculation. Columns and error bars denote mean value and standard deviation of biological replicates (Without R33, n = 30; With R33, n = 24), respectively. Different letters on top indicate significant differences (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test, P < 0.05)

Full size image

Interactions between specific bacteria and metabolites in rice straw silage

The intricate interplay between specific bacteria and metabolites was subsequently explored. The heatmap revealed that Lactobacillus exhibited the most significant correlations with identified metabolites (Fig. 6), signifying the potential influence of Lactobacillus dominance on the metabolite profile. Notably, amino acids alpha-L-Asp-L-Lys and gamma-L-Glu-epsilon-L-Lys demonstrated positive correlations with Lactobacillus. This suggests that Lactobacillus might stimulate the generation of beneficial peptides, thereby enhancing the nutrient value of rice straw silage [38]. Additionally, metabolites exhibiting positive correlations with Lactobacillus displayed negative correlations with undesired microbes like Enterobacter and Clostridium, aligning with the observed inhibition of these microbes due to Lactobacillus colonization (Figs. 2–3). Nevertheless, comprehensive investigations are warranted to unravel the mechanisms underlying the quality enhancement of rice straw silage through bacterial-metabolite interactions.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Correlations between differential bacterial genera and metabolites between silage groups with and without L. brevis R33 inoculation. Heatmap constructed based on Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Asterisks denote significant correlations (Spearman’s rho > 0.6 and < -0.6, P < 0.05)

Full size image

Conclusions

The introduction of L. brevis R33 has been demonstrated to significantly enhance the quality of fermentation. This is evidenced by the reduction in NDF and ADF contents, pH, butyric acid content, and ammonia-N levels, accompanied by a concomitant increase in IVDMD, lactic acid, and propionic acid content. Through comprehensive scrutiny of bacterial communities, we unveil the dominance of Lactobacillus and the concurrent suppression of Enterobacter and Clostridium across various levels. Augmenting our comprehension, the metabolomic analysis illuminates the mechanisms underlying the quality enhancement of rice straw silage achieved through L. brevis R33 inoculation. The enrichment of carbohydrates and amino acids furnishes a potential explanation for the ascendancy of L. brevis R33.

Materials and methods

Strain isolation and identification

The Lactobacillus buchneri R17 strain, previously isolated from oats silage, was utilized in this study. Additionally, L. brevis R33 and L. pseudomesenteroides were isolated from oats silage using selective agar plates. To isolate these strains, an oats silage sample (0.5 g) was blended with 20 ml of distilled water. This solution was then serially diluted and cultured on selective agar plates containing sodium carboxymethyl cellulose as the sole carbon source, incubated at 28 ℃ for three days. Colonies were selected based on morphology and subjected to four consecutive replatings on MRS agar plates. Single colonies were subsequently identified through Sanger sequencing, employing the primer pairs 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGC. -TCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). Activities of exoglucanase, endoglucanase, and β-glucosidase were assessed using methods outlined by Meng et al. [39].

Raw materials and silage preparation

Overnight cultures of the three LAB strains were adjusted to a final concentration of OD600 0.5, generating nine inoculants: (1) CK-distilled water; (2) LB, LB medium and distilled water; (3) Leu, L. pseudomesenteroides culture; (4) Lac17, L. buchneri R17 culture; (5) Leu + Lac17, mixture of L. pseudomesenteroides and L. buchneri R17 cultures; (6) Lac33, L. brevis R33 culture; (7) Leu + Lac33, mixture of L. pseudomesenteroides and L. brevis R33 cultures; (8) Lac17 + 33, mixture of L. buchneri R17 and L. brevis R33 cultures; (9) Leu + Lac17 + 33, mixture of L. pseudomesenteroides, L. buchneri R17, and L. brevis R33 cultures. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw was chopped into 1–2 cm pieces, and 50 g of air-dried rice straws (NDF 72.18%, ADF 46.99%) were thoroughly mixed with the aforementioned inoculants to achieve a final concentration of 106 CFU/g. This mixed straw (moisture content ~ 65%) was placed within a silo bag, sealed with a vacuum extractor (Dafeng, Wenzhou, China), and prepared in six replicates per treatment. Bags were stored at an ambient temperature (25–26 ℃) for 14 days, after which the samples were used for subsequent analyses.

Assessment of chemical composition of silage and quality of fermentation

The dry matter content of rice straw silage was determined by drying at 105 ℃ to constant weight. Dry matter loss (DML) was calculated using the formula: DML (%) = (Dry Matter weight of rice straw pre-ensiled—Dry Matter weight of rice straw post-ensiled)/Dry Matter weight of rice straw pre-ensiled × 100. To evaluate fermentation quality, 5 g of silage sample was blended with 45 ml of double distilled water. The resulting slurry was filtered using five layers of medical gauze to obtain the extract. Extract pH was measured using a PHSJ-4F pH meter (Leici, Shanghai, China). The organic acids (lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid) were quantified based on the methods described by Li et al. [33]. NDF, ADF, and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were determined using the methods outlined by Van Soest et al. [40] and Goering and Van Soest [41]. Total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) were assessed using an automatic elemental analyzer Vario Macro Cube (Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany). Ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) was determined according to Broderick and Kang [42], and NH4+-N/TN ratios were subsequently calculated. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of rice straw silage was determined over 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, utilizing the method by Tang et al. [43].

Bacterial community analysis of rice straw silage

Genomic DNA of microbial communities present in 2 g of frozen silage sample was extracted using the E.Z.N.A. stool DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA, USA). Concentrations and qualities of extracted DNA were quantified using the NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The V3-V4 variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was targeted using the universal primer pair 341F (5’-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’), resulting in individual barcoded libraries. Libraries from different treatments were pooled and subjected to 250-bp pair-end sequencing using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Raw pair-end reads were analyzed using the Qiime2 platform (https://qiime2.org/). Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were obtained by eliminating low-quality data using DADA2 [44]. Subsequently, ASVs were taxonomically annotated against the SILVA database (https://www.arb-silva.de/, Release 138) using mothur [45].

Metabolomic analysis of rice straw silage

To delve into the metabolic changes of rice straw silage, the frozen silage samples (n = 6) were thawed at 4 °C and then mixed with a pre-cooled solution of acetonitrile, methanol, and water (2:2:1, v/v) for metabolite extraction. The mixture was then centrifuged at 14000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant underwent freeze-drying and were reconstituted in a 100 μL of solution of acetonitrile and water (1:1, v/v) for further analysis. Metabolite analysis was carried out using the Agilent 1290 Infinity LC UHPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a ACQUIY UPLC BEH Amide column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) in combination with the AB Triple TOF 6600 Mass Spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Boston, MA, USA). The mobile phase for UHPLC consisted of solvent A: 25 mM ammonium hydroxide and 25 mM ammonium acetate in water, and solvent B: 100% acetonitrile. Then, a 12-min gradient was created as follows: t = 0–0.5 min, 95% solvent B; t = 0.5–7 min, 95% solvent B was linearly reduced to 65%; t = 7–8 min, 65% solvent B was linearly reduced to 40%; t = 8–9 min, 40% solvent B; t = 9–9.1 min, 40% solvent B was linearly increased to 95%; t = 9.1–12 min, 95% solvent B. In addition, the column temperature was 25 ℃, the flow rate was 500 μL/min, and the inject volume was 2 μL. The metabolites were then identified using positive and negative ions electrospray ionization (ESI). The ESI source conditions were set as follows: Ion Source Gas1: 60, Ion Source Gas2: 60, curtain gas: 30 psi, source temperature: 600 ℃, and IonSpray Voltage Floating: ± 5500 V. In MS only acquisition, the m/z range was 60–1000 Da, and the accumulation time was 0.20 s/spectra for TOF MS scan. In auto MS/MS acquisition, the m/z range was 25–1000 Da, and the accumulation time was 0.05 s/spectra for product ion scan, which was performed using information dependent acquisition (IDA) with high sensitivity mode. Raw data were initially converted to mzXML format using ProteoWizard (https://github.com/ProteoWizard) and subsequently handled with peak alignment, retention time adjustment, and extraction of the peak area using the XCMS software (https://github.com/sneumann/xcms). The parameters for peak picking were set as follows: centWave m/z = 10 ppm, peakwidth = c (10, 60), prefilter = c (10, 100). The parameters for peak grouping were set as follows: bw = 5, mzwid = 0.025, minfrac = 0.5. The annotation of isotopes and adducts was performed using CAMERA (Collection of Algorithms of MEtabolite pRofile Annotation) [46]. For the extracted ion features, only the features with more than half of the non-zero values in at least one group were retained. Compound identification of metabolites was then accomplished by comparing the accurate m/z values (< 10 ppm) with an in-house database (Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co., Ltd) comprising available authentic standards [47]. In addition, the retention time, molecular mass of metabolites (mass error < 25 ppm), secondary fragmentation spectra, and also the collision energy were matched against the local database, and the identification level was higher than level 3 of the metabolite identification confidence that proposed by Schrimpe-Rutledge et al. [48].

Data analysis and statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using Tukey's honestly significant difference test, with a significance level of P < 0.05. To explore the variation in bacterial communities, Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) was performed using the "vegan" package in R v4.2.3. Additionally, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of metabolites was executed using the same package, and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was employed to assess the statistical significance of ordination plots. The Shannon indices for different bacterial communities were computed using the "vegan" package in R v4.2.3. Enrichment and depletion analyses of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) and regulation analyses of metabolites between groups were executed using the Manhattan plot (via the "CMplot" package) and Volcano plot (via the "ggVolcano" package), respectively, in R v4.2.3. The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites was conducted using the "tidyverse," "magrittr," and "clusterProfiler" packages in R v4.2.3. Furthermore, the correlation between differential bacterial genera and differential metabolites was explored through pairwise Spearman's rank correlation analysis, utilizing the "psych" package in R v4.2.3.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during this study were included in this Manuscript. The raw data of high-throughput sequencing will be provided upon request.

References

  1. Abraham A, Mathew AK, Sindhu R, Pandey A, Binod P. Potential of rice straw for bio-refining: an overview. Bioresour Technol. 2016;215:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh G, Gupta MK, Chaurasiya S, Sharma VS, Pimenov DY. Rice straw burning: a review on its global prevalence and the sustainable alternatives for its effective mitigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:32125–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Soest PJ. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2006;130:137–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Magaji U, Hussin G, Ramli A, et al. Fermentation quality and additives: a case of rice straw silage. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7985167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarnklong C, Cone JW, Pellikaan WF, Hendriks WH. Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: a review. Asian Australas J Animal Sci. 2010;23:680–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE. Silage review: factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:3952–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, et al. Ensiling as pretreatment of rice straw: the effect of hemicellulase and Lactobacillus plantarum on hemicellulose degradation and cellulose conversion. Bioresour Technol. 2018;266:158–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, Contreras-Govea FE, Santos MC, Kung L Jr. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:3980–4000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JG, Ham JS, Li YW, Park HS, Huh CS, Park BC. Development of a new lactic acid bacterial inoculant for fresh rice straw silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017;30:950–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang YS, Shi W, Huang LT, Ding CL, Dai CC. The effect of lactic acid bacterial starter culture and chemical additives on wilted rice straw silage. Anim Sci J. 2016;87:525–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation dynamics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of rice straw silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019;32:783–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. He L, Zhou W, Xing Y, Pian R, Chen X, Zhang Q. Improving the quality of rice straw silage with Moringa oleifera leaves and propionic acid: fermentation, nutrition, aerobic stability and microbial communities. Bioresour Technol. 2020;299:122579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li P, Ji S, Wang Q, Qin M, Hou C, Shen Y. Adding sweet potato vines improve the quality of rice straw silage. Anim Sci J. 2017;88:625–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mu L, Xie Z, Hu L, Chen G, Zhang Z. Cellulase interacts with Lactobacillus plantarum to affect chemical composition, bacterial communities, and aerobic stability in mixed silage of high-moisture amaranth and rice straw. Bioresour Technol. 2020;315:123772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozkose E, Akyol I, Kar B, Comlekcioglu U, Ekinci MS. Expression of fungal cellulase gene in Lactococcus lactis to construct novel recombinant silage inoculants. Folia Microbiol. 2009;54:335–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Driehuis F. Silage and the safety and quality of dairy foods: a review. Agr Food Sci. 2013;22:16–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carvalho BF, Sales GFC, Schwan RF, Avila CLS. Criteria for lactic acid bacteria screening to enhance silage quality. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;130:341–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Driehuis F, Wilkinson JM, Jiang Y, Ogunade I, Adesogan AT. Silage review: animal and human health risks from silage. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:4093–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xing L, Chen LJ, Han LJ. The effect of an inoculant and enzymes on fermentation and nutritive value of sorghum straw silages. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:488–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Avila CLS, Carvalho BF. Silage fermentation-updates focusing on the performance of micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;128:966–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan X, Dong Z, Li J, Shao T. Microbial community dynamics and their contributions to organic acid production during the early stage of the ensiling of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum). Grass Forage Sci. 2019;75:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Chen X, Wang C, He L, Zhou W, Yang F, et al. The bacterial community and fermentation quality of mulberry (Morus alba) leaf silage with or without Lactobacillus casei and sucrose. Bioresour Technol. 2019;293:122059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mu L, Wang Q, Cao X, Zhang Z. Effects of fatty acid salts on fermentation characteristics, bacterial diversity and aerobic stability of mixed silage prepared with alfalfa, rice straw and wheat bran. J Sci Food Agric. 2022;102:1475–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ali N, Wang S, Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Nazar M, et al. Microbial diversity and fermentation profile of red clover silage inoculated with reconstituted indigenous and exogenous epiphytic microbiota. Bioresour Technol. 2020;314:123606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bai J, Xu D, Xie D, Wang M, Li Z, Guo X. Effects of antibacterial peptide-producing Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, aerobic stability, and microbial community of alfalfa silage. Bioresour Technol. 2020;315:123881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jia T, Yun Y, Yu Z. Propionic acid and sodium benzoate affected biogenic amine formation, microbial community, and quality of oat silage. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:750920.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang H, Meng Y, Wang Y, Zhou Q, Li A, Liu G, et al. Prokaryotic communities in multidimensional bottom-pit-mud from old and young pits used for the production of Chinese Strong-Flavor Baijiu. Food Chem. 2020;312:126084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Song J, Liu Z, Zhang G, Zhang Y. Fermentation quality and microbial community of corn stover or rice straw silage mixed with soybean curd residue. Animals (Basel). 2022;12:919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cubas-Cano E, González-Fernández C, Ballesteros M, Tomás-Pejó E. Biotechnological advances in lactic acid production by lactic acid bacteria: lignocellulose as novel substrate. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2018;12:290–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo W, Jia W, Li Y, Chen S. Performances of Lactobacillus brevis for producing lactic acid from hydrolysate of lignocellulosics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;161:124–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Adesogan AT, Ma ZX, Romero JJ, Arriola KG. Ruminant nutrition symposium: Improving cell wall digestion and animal performance with fibrolytic enzymes. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:1317–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Desta ST, Yuan X, Li J, Shao T. Ensiling characteristics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and enzymatic digestibility of Napier grass ensiled with additives. Bioresour Technol. 2016;221:447–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li F, Ding Z, Ke W, Xu D, Zhang P, Bai J, et al. Ferulic acid esterase-producing lactic acid bacteria and cellulase pretreatments of corn stalk silage at two different temperatures: ensiling characteristics, carbohydrates composition and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol. 2019;282:211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tao H, Si B, Xu W, Tu Y, Diao Q. Effect of Broussonetia papyrifera L silage on blood biochemical parameters, growth performance, meat amino acids and fatty acids compositions in beef cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020;33:732–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan MZ, Liu S, Ma Y, Ma M, Ullah Q, Khan IM, et al. Overview of the effect of rumen-protected limiting amino acids (methionine and lysine) and choline on the immunity, antioxidative, and inflammatory status of periparturient ruminants. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1042895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Newbold CJ, Ramos-Morales E. Review: ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host. Animal. 2020;14:s78–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Locher KP. Mechanistic diversity in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:487–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fu Z, Sun L, Hou M, Hao J, Lu Q, Liu T, et al. Effects of different harvest frequencies on microbial community and metabolomic properties of annual ryegrass silage. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:971449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Meng QS, Liu CG, Zhao XQ, Bai FW. Engineering Trichoderma reesei Rut-C30 with the overexpression of egl1 at the ace1 locus to relieve repression on cellulase production and to adjust the ratio of cellulolytic enzymes for more efficient hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. J Biotechnol. 2018;285:56–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3583–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analysis (Apparatus reagents, procedures and some applications). Washington, DC: Agriculture Handbook, United States Department of Agriculture, Government Printing Office; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci. 1980;63:64–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang YM, Qiu SN, Li QY, Di GL, Wang JL, Sun HX. Simulated global climate change benefits the nutritive value of oat grass. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2022;24:846–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Schloss DP. Reintroducing mothur: 10 years later. Appl Environ Microb. 2020;86:e02343-e2419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Stricker T, Bonner R, Lisacek F, Hopfgartner G. Adduct annotation in liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry to enhance compound identification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021;413:503–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gu Z, Li L, Tang S, Liu C, Fu X, Shi Z, et al. Metabolomics reveals that crossbred dairy buffaloes are more thermotolerant than Holstein Cows under chronic heat stress. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66:12889–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schrimpe-Rutledge AC, Codreanu SG, Sherrod SD, McLean JA. Untargeted metabolomics strategies-Challenges and emerging directions. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2016;27:1897–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the bioinformatic analysis platform ImageGP (http://www.bic.ac.cn/BIC/#/).

Funding

This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS (XDA26040202 and XDA28020401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32371734, 42007034), and the Young Scientist Group Project of Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology (2022QNXZ04).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China

    Yu Sun, Yunmeng Tang, Qingyang Li, Chunjie Tian & Haixia Sun

  2. Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China

    Yu Sun & Chunjie Tian

  3. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin, 150081, China

    Qinglong Sun, Yunmeng Tang, Qingyang Li & Haixia Sun

  4. Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China

    Qinglong Sun

Authors
  1. Yu Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qinglong Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunmeng Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingyang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chunjie Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Haixia Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HS, CT, and YS conceptualized and designed the study; YS, QS, YT, and QL performed the experiments; YS, QS, and YT analyzed the data and prepared the figures; YS, CT, and HS wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunjie Tian or Haixia Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Crude protein content of rice straw silage with inoculation of different strains. Figure S2. Enzyme activities of L. brevis R33. Figure S3. Abundance of ferulic acid in the silage groups with and without inoculation of L. brevis R33. Table S1. Statistical significance of the clustering pattern in ordination plots of the bacterial communities of rice straw silage with inoculations of different strains. Table S2. Statistical significance of the clustering pattern in ordination plots of the metabolite profiles of rice straw silage with inoculations of different strains.

Additional file 2.

 All identified metabolites of rice straw silage with inoculations of different strains.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Sun, Q., Tang, Y. et al. Integrated microbiology and metabolomic analysis reveal the improvement of rice straw silage quality by inoculation of Lactobacillus brevis. Biotechnol Biofuels 16, 184 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-023-02431-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-023-02431-y

Keywords

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

ISSN: 2731-3654

Contact us