Open Access

Anaerobic detoxification of acetic acid in a thermophilic ethanologen

  • A Joe Shaw1, 2,
  • Bethany B Miller1,
  • Stephen R Rogers1,
  • William R Kenealy1, 3,
  • Alex Meola1,
  • Ashwini Bhandiwad4, 5,
  • W Ryan Sillers1, 6,
  • Indraneel Shikhare1,
  • David A Hogsett1, 7 and
  • Christopher D Herring1, 4Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels20158:75

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0257-4

Received: 3 March 2015

Accepted: 24 April 2015

Published: 9 May 2015

Abstract

Background

The liberation of acetate from hemicellulose negatively impacts fermentations of cellulosic biomass, limiting the concentrations of substrate that can be effectively processed. Solvent-producing bacteria have the capacity to convert acetate to the less toxic product acetone, but to the best of our knowledge, this trait has not been transferred to an organism that produces ethanol at high yield.

Results

We have engineered a five-step metabolic pathway to convert acetic acid to acetone in the thermophilic anaerobe Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum. The first steps of the pathway, a reversible conversion of acetate to acetyl-CoA, are catalyzed by the native T. saccharolyticum enzymes acetate kinase and phosphotransacetylase. ack and pta normally divert 30% of catabolic carbon flux to acetic acid; however, their re-introduction in evolved ethanologen strains resulted in virtually no acetic acid production. Conversion between acetic acid and acetyl-CoA remained active, as evidenced by rapid 13C label transfer from exogenous acetate to ethanol. Genomic re-sequencing of six independently evolved ethanologen strains showed convergent mutations in the hfs hydrogenase gene cluster, which when transferred to wildtype T. saccharolyticum conferred a low acid production phenotype. Thus, the mutated hfs genes effectively separate acetic acid production and consumption from central metabolism, despite their intersecting at the common intermediate acetyl-CoA. To drive acetic acid conversion to a less inhibitory product, the enzymes thiolase, acetoacetate:acetate CoA-transferase, and acetoacetate decarboxylase were assembled in T. saccharolyticum with genes from thermophilic donor organisms that do not natively produce acetone. The resultant strain converted acetic acid to acetone and ethanol while maintaining a metabolic yield of 0.50 g ethanol per gram carbohydrate.

Conclusions

Conversion of acetic acid to acetone results in improved ethanol productivity and titer and is an attractive low-cost solution to acetic acid inhibition.

Keywords

Acetate detoxification Cellulosic ethanol Metabolic engineering Inhibitors

Background

Biological conversion of low-cost carbohydrate-based renewable resources [1] is often hindered by inhibitors present in these heterogeneous materials. Acetic acid has consistently been reported as one of the most significant inhibitors, followed by furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural, and phenolic compounds [2,3]. Unlike other inhibitors, which are by-products of specific chemical and physical pretreatment processes [4,5], acetic acid can result directly from acetylated carbohydrates, and its production is unavoidable during carbohydrate fermentation.

Acetic acid is a particularly potent inhibitor at pH values under 6, a range common for industrial fermentation [6-8]. Undissociated acetic acid (pKa 4.75) freely passes through cellular membranes, where it can then reach a new equilibrium with dissociated acetic acid at the intracellular pH. The net result is both uncoupling of the transmembrane pH gradient and an accumulation of acetate anion in the cytoplasm [9,10].

Several chemical and physical methods to separate or detoxify acetic acid prior to fermentation have been proposed [11], but they require additional expense to implement, which may hinder commercial application. Biological removal of acetate has also been proposed via aerobic respiration of acetate followed by fermentation of carbohydrates to ethanol [12,13]. However, this requires a separate oxygen-dependent incubation, which raises overall process costs. Solventogenic clostridia, typified by Clostridium acetobutylicum, have the native ability to convert acetic acid and butyric acid into the solvents acetone and butanol [14]. The conversion is not easily transferrable to the context of ethanol production though, as it normally occurs in two phases with acetate first produced in an acidogenic phase, followed by conversion to acetone in a solventogenic phase [15].

Acetate detoxification can occur under normal fermentation conditions, enabled by an advanced organism without requiring additional capital equipment. We report conversion of acetic acid to acetone while maintaining a high yield of carbohydrates to ethanol in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum, thereby demonstrating a low-cost solution to acetic acid inhibition.

Results

Re-introduction of ack and pta do not restore acetate production in evolved ethanologen strains

T. saccharolyticum has previously been engineered to produce ethanol at high yield by deletion of ldh encoding L-lactate dehydrogenase and ack and pta encoding acetate kinase and phosphotransacetylase [16,17]. From a carbon-based perspective, these two deletions eliminate organic acid production and force central metabolic flux towards ethanol. From an electron-based perspective, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) generated during glycolysis and reduced ferredoxin generated during pyruvate cleavage must be re-oxidized through reduction of acetyl-CoA to ethanol, rather than through formation of lactic acid or molecular hydrogen (Figure 1). In attempts to engineer ethanologen strains with improved properties for industrial fermentation, we developed multiple strain lineages derived from strain M0355, a Δldh Δack Δpta mutant [16]. Several of these lineages underwent evolutionary selection, either via continuous culture or serial transfer, for improved fermentation fitness (Figure 2). Interestingly, we found on several occasions that re-introduction of phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase into evolved strains resulted in greatly reduced acetic acid production as compared to the same genes re-introduced into strain M0355 or the wildtype strain.
Figure 1

Synthetic pathway to convert acetic acid to acetone. Acetic acid diffuses freely into the cell following hydrolysis of acetylated polysaccharides and is then activated to acetyl-CoA by acetate kinase (1), phosphotransacetylase (2), and a half-reaction of CoA-transferase (4). Two acetyl-CoA molecules are then converted to acetoacetyl-CoA by thiolase (3), acetoacetate by the other half-reaction of CoA-transferase, and finally to acetone and CO2 by acetoacetate decarboxylase (5). Although the synthetic pathway shares a common intermediate with the ethanol production pathway, carbohydrate to ethanol production remains highly coupled due to the requirement to balance NAD(P)+/NAD(P)H generation. Hydrogenases (6) act to uncouple electron acceptor regeneration and ethanol formation, resulting in production of acetic acid through the reversible acetate kinase and phosphotransacetylase pathway.

Figure 2

Lineage of strains selected for improved growth rate and ethanol production in this study. M0355 carries deletions of the ldh, pta, and ack but was not selected for improved growth rate. The lineages resulting in M0694, M0699, and M0700 were cultivated in continuous culture to select for improved growth properties. The lineages resulting in M0731, M0734, and M0863 were exposed to chemical mutagenesis and serial transfer for improved growth properties; the lineage resulting in M0863 was subsequently cultured in continuous culture. All strains were isolated as single colonies prior to genomic DNA isolation and re-sequencing.

Spontaneous mutations occurring during evolutionary selection direct electron flux to ethanol

One possible explanation for this phenomenon was that mutations which occurred during the evolutionary process direct metabolic flux to ethanol even in the presence of a functional pathway from acetyl-CoA to acetic acid. We re-sequenced the genomes of six evolved strains (Table 1), revealing 12 to 28 mutations per strain. In strains sharing a common lineage, up to 10 of the mutations were present in both strains. However regardless of lineage, we found recurrent mutations in two loci relevant to acetic acid and ethanol production; in subunits of the hfs hydrogenase gene operon and in adhE, the bifunctional acetaldehyde alcohol dehydrogenase (Table 2). We thought either of these mutant loci might contribute to the acetate minus phenomenon; entire deletion of the hfs hydrogenase gene operon has previously been shown to reduce acetic acid production [18], while mutations in adhE could result in a higher affinity for acetyl-CoA or NAD(P)H, effectively out-competing acetic acid or hydrogen formation, respectively. To test these possibilities, we introduced the hfs and adhE mutations that had occurred in evolved strain M0863 into the wildtype background via homologous recombination with selection based on insertion of a kanamycin resistance marker 3′ to the genomic region of interest. Depending on the exact site of recombination crossover, the mutations were not always carried along with the marker. Strains with the desired mutation were identified by DNA sequencing, and strains without mutations were also evaluated to determine effects that introduction of the resistance marker may have introduced. Results are shown in Table 3. While the mutant adhE gene had an impact on end product ratios, only the strain carrying the hfs spontaneous mutations produced significantly less acetic acid, with a combined ethanol and lactate to acetate ratio 10-fold higher than wildtype. Introduction of the M0863-acquired hfs mutations did not appear detrimental to growth rate, which was in contrast to a complete deletion of the hfs operon, which decreased growth rate and the amount of consumed carbohydrate [18].
Table 1

Strains used in this study

Strain

Description

Source

M0010

T. saccharolyticum JW/SL-YS485 DSM 8691

DSMZ

M0355

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh

(16)

M1291

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh Cth ureABCDEFG

This study

M1442

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh Cth ureABCDEFG

This study

M1667

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh::Tsa pta ack kanR Cth ureABCDEFG

This study

M2030

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh::Tsa pta ack Cac thl Tme thl Tte thl Cac ctfAB Tme ctfAB Cac adc Bam adc kanR Cth ureABCDEFG

This study

M2202

T. saccharolyticum adhE*::kanR

This study

M2203

T. saccharolyticum adhE::kanR

This study

M2204

T. saccharolyticum hfs*::kanR

This study

M2205

T. saccharolyticum hfs::kanR

This study

M2212

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh::Tsa pta ack Tte thl Tme ctfAB Bam adc kanR Cth ureABCDEFG

This study

Top10

E. coli cloning strain

Invitrogen, Madison, WI

FY2

S. cerevisiae cloning strain

(37)

 

Re-sequenced strains with improved growth rate

 

M0694

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh continuous cultured adapted

This study

M0699

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh continuous cultured adapted

This study

M0700

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh continuous cultured adapted

This study

M0731

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh mutation and serial transfer

This study

M0734

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh mutation and serial transfer

This study

M0863

T. saccharolyticum Δpta Δack Δldh mutation and serial transfer

This study

DSMZ, Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen.

Table 2

Mutations identified by re-sequencing

Gene

Locus tag

ORF nt

DNA mutation

Coding change

Occurrence in strain

adhE

Tsac_416

1630

G → A

G → D

M0734, M0863

adhE

Tsac_416

1804

C → T

S → L

M0699

adhE

Tsac_416

1808

A → G

E → G

M0694, M0700

hfsA

Tsac_1550

159

A → -

Frameshift

M0700

hfsB

Tsac_1551

434

A → -

Frameshift

M0734, M0863

hfsB

Tsac_1551

652

A → -

Frameshift

M0731

hfsC

Tsac_1552

255

A → -

Frameshift

M0699

hfsD

Tsac_1553

193

G → A

A → T

M0699

hfsD

Tsac_1553

321

A → T

R → S

M0863

hfsD

Tsac_1553

787

G → A

E → K

M0734

Table 3

Re-introduction of spontaneous adhE and hfs hydrogenase mutations that occurred during growth adaptation of the Δldh , Δpta Δack ethanologen strain M0863 into wildtype (WT) T. saccharolyticum

  

Units in mM

 

Strain

Genotype

Cellobiose consumed

Lactate

Acetate

Ethanol

Carbon recovery (%)

M0010

WT

28.2 ± 0.6

13.8 ± 0.5

34.7 ± 0.7

63.5 ± 2.3

99

M2202

adhE*::kan R

30.2 ± 0.0

2.4 ± 0.1

42.3 ± 0.3

76.5 ± 0.6

100

M2203

adhE::kan R

27.7 ± 2.6

1.4 ± 0.2

29.0 ± 1.6

78.4 ± 8.6

98

M2204

hfs*::kan R

29.9 ± 0.1

20.3 ± 0.5

4.2 ± 0.1

91.7 ± 0.6

97

M2205

hfs::kan R

28.1 ± 0.7

9.9 ± 2.2

29.8 ± 1.1

67.9 ± 2.7

96

*mutations found in evolved strain M0863 introduced by homologous recombination. Data are average of four replicates, anaerobic TSC7 medium, 55°C, 24-h fermentation of 30.4 ± 0.7 mM cellobiose. Mutations were created via homologous recombination of a kanamycin resistance marker downstream of the hfs operon that contained mutations in the upstream flanking region. M2202 - kanR inserted 3′ of the adhE gene, with the M0863 mutant adhE sequence. M2203 - kanR inserted 3′ of the adhE gene, with the WT adhE sequence. M2204 - kanR inserted 3′ of the hfs gene operon, with the M0863 mutant hfs sequence. M2205 - kanR inserted 3′ of the hfs gene operon, with the WT hfs sequence.

Acetic acid and acetyl-CoA freely interconvert in evolved ethanologen strains harboring ack and pta

Figure 3 shows 13C2-labeled acetate spiked at 18 hours in a batch carbohydrate fermentation with strain M1667 (an evolved ethanologen from the M0863 lineage with re-introduced ack and pta genes) in the presence of 60 mM externally added acetic acid. Based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra, the 13C2 label is almost completely transferred from acetic acid to ethanol within 7 hours, despite minimal change in the bulk acetic acid concentration. This data indicates a dilution of the 13C2 acetate pool by approximately 50% in an hour and a corresponding increase in 13C2 ethanol. No other metabolite showed enrichment of 13C beyond that expected from natural abundance indicating that the acetate was metabolized intact. In similar experiments with strain M1291, the direct parent strain of M1667 without ack and pta, there was no evidence of 13C label transfer from acetic acid for up to 48 hours after spike addition.
Figure 3

Fate of 13C2-labeled acetate during strain M1667 carbohydrate fermentation. Strain M1667 was grown in batch fermentation in a 3:2 weight mixture of maltodextrin and cellobiose at a concentration of 900 mM glucose equivalents and 45 mM acetic acid at an initial pH of 6.0. At 18 hours, the culture was spiked with 15 mM sodium acetate-13C2. Bulk metabolite measurements (A) and 13C label (B) were monitored for extracellular acetic acid (filled triangles) and ethanol (crosses). No appreciable label was found in metabolites other than acetic acid and ethanol. Data is from one representative experiment.

The reaction acetic acid + ATP + CoA ↔ acetyl-CoA + ADP + Pi is near thermodynamic equilibrium (+2 kJ/mol at pH 7) and is used by microorganisms for both acetate production and consumption in various environmental conditions [19-22]. Although the bulk concentration of acetic acid remained constant in evolved ethanologen strains containing pta and ack, we hypothesize that labeled acetate is reversibly converted into labeled acetyl-CoA, a fraction of which is then irreversibly converted into labeled ethanol. The intracellular acetyl-CoA pool is also fed by unlabeled carbohydrate metabolism and, assuming that 13C label is not differentially recognized, can be equally used to produce acetate or ethanol. Carbohydrate-derived acetyl-CoA then acts to dilute the labeled acetate/acetyl-CoA pool and allows the creation of labeled ethanol. Due to stoichiometric coupling with hydrogen formation, net acetate formation is arrested via the evolutionarily acquired hfs mutations while the capacity to convert acetate to acetyl-CoA is retained.

Construction of a synthetic pathway for the conversion of acetic acid to acetone

Exogenously added acetone is substantially less inhibitory than acetic acid to T. saccharolyticum in the pH range of 5.0 to 5.5 relevant to industrial fermentation (Figure 4). Additionally, conversion of two molecules of acetic acid results in one molecule of acetone, further lowering the potential for acetone inhibition. Solventogenic Clostridia such as C. acetobutylicum have native biochemical pathways to convert acetic acid into acetone, although they are intricately coupled to carbohydrate metabolism. We began by importing the C. acetobutylicum acetone pathway, inclusive of thiolase, acetate:acetoacetyl-CoA-transferase, and acetoacetate decarboxylase (thl ctfAB adc) as well as the T. saccharolyticum acetate kinase and phosphotransacetylase into the T. saccharolyticum expression plasmid pMU1299 that integrates at the ldh locus. Despite conferring acetone production in E. coli (Table 4), we could find no evidence of acetone formation upon integration of the plasmid in T. saccharolyticum. While RT-PCR experiments (not shown) indicated transcriptional activity of the acetone pathway genes, a likely issue was temperature incompatibility of the donor and host organism; C. acetobutylicum has grown optimally between 30°C and 37°C, while T. saccharolyticum’s growth rate drops precipitously below 48°C, the lowest temperature where we assayed for acetone formation.
Figure 4

Maximum growth rate of T. saccharolyticum in the presence of exogenously added acetic acid or acetone at pH 5.0 and 5.5 in TSC7 medium with 10 g/L cellobiose at 55°C. Open circles - acetic acid pH 5.0, open diamonds - acetic acid pH 5.5, filled squares - acetone pH 5.0, filled triangles - acetone pH 5.5. Data represent the mean of triplicate cultures +/− one standard deviation.

Table 4

Acetone production in E.coli

 

Glucose

Lactic

Acetic

Ethanol

Acetone

Media

24.5

0.0

4.2

0.0

0.0

TOP10 + pMU1299

16.1

5.9

3.1

0.5

1.8

TOP10 + pACYC177

19.5

3.6

5.1

0.4

0.0

Fermentation end point at 170 hours, in LB media supplemented with 25 g/L glucose, 4 g/L acetic acid, and 50 μg/mL kanamycin sulfate. Microaerobic conditions were utilized by inoculation into sealed 125 mL pressure bottles with atmospheric pressure air. Incubation was performed without agitation at 30°C, with a 1/10th v/v inoculation from aerobically grown overnight LB media supplemented with kanamycin.

We next looked for thermophilic acetone producers but could not find a native acetone producer with an optimal growth temperature higher than 43°C [23]. We could, however, find homologs to each of the three enzymes in the acetone pathway residing in the sequenced genomes of thermophilic bacteria (Table 5). None of these thermophiles were reported to produce acetone, and the entire pathway was not present in a single organism. To explore the ability of these genes to produce acetone, we opted to progressively incorporate expression vectors harboring thermophilic acetone pathway homologs into T. saccharolyticum and assay the resulting strains for acetone production. Qualitative evidence of ketone body formation was first identified in strain M2030 (Figure 5), which contained, in addition to the T. saccharolyticum ack and pta genes, three thl genes, two ctfAB gene operons, and two adc genes. We then constructed strains with minimal sets of acetone pathway genes while continuing to assay for acetone formation; the most efficient acetone producer, M2212, was created by expression of a putative thiolase from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum DSM 571, a putative CoA-transferase from Thermosipho melanesiensis DSM 12029, and a putative acetoacetate decarboxylase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. The T. thermosaccharolyticum thl is part of a gene operon with several homologs involved in butanol production, and the organism has been reported to produce butanol [24]. T. melanesiensis ctfAB is adjacent to a thiolase in its native genetic organization, which could potentially be involved in acetoacetate degradation. The B. amyloliquefaciens adc appears to be independently transcribed; however, the native function of either enzyme is not obvious based on genetic organization and the known physiology of these organisms.
Table 5

Genes tested for acetone production in T.saccharolyticum

Source strain

T opt (°C)

Gene

Genbank protein

Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum DSM 8691

60

pta

ACA51668

Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum DSM 8691

60

ack

ACA51669

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

35

thl

NP_349476

Thermosipho melanesiensis DSM 12029

70

thl

YP_001306374

Kosmotoga olearia DSM 21960

65

thl

YP_002940320

Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum DSM 571

60

thl

YP_003852249

Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum DSM 571

60

actA

CAA93155

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

35

ctfA

NP_149326

Thermosipho melanesiensis DSM 12029

70

ctfA

YP_001306376

Kosmotoga olearia DSM 21960

65

ctfA

YP_002940319

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

35

ctfB

NP_149327

Thermosipho melanesiensis DSM 12029

70

ctfB

YP_001306375

Kosmotoga olearia DSM 21960

65

ctfB

YP_002940318

Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

35

adc

NP_149328

Acidothermus cellulolyticus B11 ATCC 43068

55

adc

YP_872855

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 BGSC 10A6

50

adc

YP_001422565

Topt is the optimal temperature for growth of the source strain.

Figure 5

Rothera’s test (1) for acetone and acetoacetic acid formation performed on spent fermentation medium, initially containing 50 g/L cellobiose and 5 g/L acetic acid. From left to right, M2030, M1675 + pMU131 (the immediate parent strain of M2030), and uninoculated medium. Acetone and acetoacetic acid are characterized by a purple/red coloremetric reaction with sodium nitroprusside in the presence of saturating ammonia. To perform the test, 4-mL samples were saturated with ammonium sulfate, and 5% sodium nitroprusside was added followed by an overlay of 1 mL 25% ammonium hydroxide. Photograph was taken 18 hours after addition of sodium nitroprusside.

Strain M2212 was also assayed for the in vitro ability to catalyze conversions along the pathway of acetyl-CoA to acetone. Table 6 shows data collected from cell-free extract measurements of thiolase, CoA-transferase, and acetoacetate decarboxylase from strain M2212 and M1442, the direct parent ethanologen. While activities for these enzymes were at or below the limit of detection with strain M1442, detectable levels were found for each step with strain M2212.
Table 6

Enzymatic activities in cell extracts

 

μmol min −1 mg −1 protein

 

Thiolase

SD

CoA-transferase

SD

Acetoacetate decarboxylase

SD

M1442

0.06

0.13

0.02

0.02

0.17

0.23

M2212

10.21

0.55

3.57

0.09

1.66

0.26

Data represent the mean of triplicate determinations +/− one standard deviation. SD, standard deviation.

Expression of the synthetic acetone pathway improves ethanol productivity and titer in the presence of acetic acid

Strain M2212 and strain M1442 were grown in batch fermentation in the presence of acetic acid (Figure 6). M2212 reduced the overall acetic acid concentration by 2.8 g/L, which in combination with an increase in the pH, reduced the undissociated acetic acid concentration from an initial 1.3 g/L to below 0.6 g/L. 0.78 g/L acetone was produced, a value lower than that expected from the theoretical 0.5 g/g conversion of acetic acid to acetone. However, this measurement may also reflect some acetone evaporation during fermentation gas release, as the boiling point of acetone, 54°C, is slightly below the 55°C fermentation temperature. In contrast, fermentation with strain M1442 resulted in a small 0.4 g/L increase in acetic acid, while the undissociated acetic acid concentration rose to over 4.3 g/L as a result of declining pH during the fermentation. From Figure 4, a 50% decrease in μmax occurs at an undissociated acetic acid concentration of 0.61 to 0.81 g/L. The decline in pH with strain M1442 is likely a result of assimilation of ammonium sulfate and carbonic acid generated during production of carbon dioxide. The conversion of acetic acid to acetone completely reversed this pH trend in strain M2212.
Figure 6

Fermentation of maltodextrin, plotted as glucose equivalents, in the presence of 10 g/L acetic acid in TSC7 medium at 55°C. (A-F) show the levels of different substrates, products or pH, as indicated by the vertical axis label. Filled squares - M2212, containing the acetic acid to acetone pathway. Open squares - parental ethanologen strain M1442. Strain M1442 rapidly encounters inhibition as the undissociated acetic acid concentration rises, while M2212 decreases the undissociated acetic acid to below 0.6 g/L (F). Data represent the mean of triplicate cultures +/− one standard deviation.

Strain M2212 has favorable ethanol fermentation metrics as well; compared to M1442, the final ethanol titer was 33.1 g/L higher, an increase of more than 300%. Volumetric productivity at 48 hours rose from 0.22 g/L hr−1 to 0.92 g/L hr−1, also an increase of over 300%. Final metabolic yields, as a measure of gram ethanol produced per gram glucose equivalent consumed, were 0.48 g/g for M1442 and 0.50 g/g for M2212.

Discussion

The observation that re-introduction of ack and pta in evolved ethanologen strains resulted only in minute amounts of acetic acid production was surprising; the genes had initially been removed to eliminate acetic acid production, which can account for up to 30% of total organic end products on a molar basis in wildtype cells [17,25]. Predicting that evolutionary selection had imparted mutations resulting in this phenotype, we examined the genome sequences of several strains descended from strain M0355 that had been serially or continuously cultured for several generations. We identified two mutational hotspots, in the hfs hydrogenase gene operon and the adhE bifunctional acetaldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase, that could be rationally predicted to impact acetic acid production. Introducing these mutations to the wildtype strain indicated that the hfs mutation is responsible for a sharp decrease in acetic acid production.

An entire deletion of the hfs operon has previously been shown to reduce acetic acid production in wildtype and Δldh T. saccharolyticum strains [18]. However, it also results in strains with poor fermentation kinetics, which are not readily improved after several serial transfers. Deletion of the entire hfs operon in evolved Δldh Δack Δpta ethanologens also resulted in strains with poor fermentation kinetics, suggesting that the point mutations acquired through evolution have a more nuanced effect than an entire loss of function mutation. Any fitness advantage the hfs mutations impart to ethanologen strains is unknown, although it is tempting to speculate that cellular redox regulation may play a role. Of six evolved strains, five acquired frameshift mutations in the genes hfsA, hfsB, or hfsC, encoding a putative ferredoxin, a hydrogenase and [PAS] sensory domain fusion and a histidine kinase, respectively. Identification and classification of [FeFe] hydrogenases with possible sensory functions is an area of current investigation [26-28]. These frameshift mutations may be beneficial by loss of function of the affected gene but may also have beneficial effects through polar down-regulation of the gene hfsD downstream. This gene, encoding a putative monomeric group B [FeFe] hydrogenase [28], only acquired point mutations, resulting in amino acid changes in three of six strains. A small amount of hydrogen production can be predicted to be important for ethanologen strains to maintain redox balance with cell mass and associated carbon dioxide generation from carbohydrates, in a role parallel to that of glycerol formation in S. cerevisiae [29-31].

The adhE mutations, although not further investigated here, may be involved in co-factor specificity and increased ethanol tolerance, as previously reported for C. thermocellum [32]. Another evolved T. saccharolyticum ethanologen, strain ALK2, was shown to have an increase in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) specificity and a decrease in NADH specificity for whole cell extract alcohol dehydrogenase activity [17].

The combination of hfs gene mutations and ack and pta re-introduction allows for inter-conversion of acetic acid and acetyl-CoA independent of central metabolism. To detoxify acetic acid with concurrent high yield fermentation of carbohydrates to ethanol, the solvent acetone was an attractive end product of acetic acid metabolism. It is less inhibitory than acetic acid, can be easily recovered through distillation, and can be sold as a commodity chemical. The native solventogenic clostridial pathway takes one acetyl-CoA and one acetic acid and converts them to one CoA, one CO2, and one acetone. This, combined with action of phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase, allows the redox neutral conversion of two acetic acid and one ATP to one acetone, one CO2, one H2O, and one ADP + Pi. The standard Gibbs free energy change for this reaction is −0.8 kJ/rxn, a fairly small driving force. However, if acetic acid accumulates intracellularly due to a transmembrane pH gradient, the overall reaction will become increasingly thermodynamically favorable. Assuming acetic acid is at intracellular and extracellular equilibrium, an extracellular change of 1.0 pH unit more acidic results in a ΔG’ change of −12.4 kJ/rxn. Thus, the pathway becomes more thermodynamically feasible as acetic acid becomes more inhibitory.

The inability to produce acetone in T. saccharolyticum with heterologously expressed enzymes from C. acetobutylicum and the lack of natively thermophilic acetone producers led us to test homologs of thiolase, CoA-transferase, and acetoacetate decarboxylase from thermophiles that presumably participate in other metabolic pathways. The final pathway reported here, utilizing genes from T. saccharolyticum, T. thermosaccharolyticum, T. melanesiensis, and B. amyloliquefaciens, is assembled entirely from organisms that do not produce acetone from acetic acid.

Despite being carbon and electron independent, production of acetone from acetic acid does require chemical energy in the form of ATP, which must be supplied from central catabolism. Based on a stoichiometric evaluation of the fermentation presented in Figure 6, 5% of the total ATP produced by carbohydrate catabolism is used for acetic acid conversion to acetone during the maximum rate of acetone formation. The rapid and complete conversion of 13C-labeled acetate to ethanol indicates there is sufficient capacity for acetate entry into the cell. Further conversion could be limited by thermodynamic feasibility, as the majority of the residual acetic acid is in the dissociated species when the rate of acetone production decreases.

From economic and process engineering perspectives, biological conversion of acetic acid to acetone provides several distinct advantages over other detoxification methods. In the case of lignocellulose to ethanol conversion, it is likely to increase ethanol productivity and titer, while maintaining the carbohydrate to ethanol yield essential for efficient biofuel production. Acetone is readily recovered by distillation equipment already installed for ethanol recovery, and it has a selling price around $1.15 per kg [33] with a North American market size of 1.6 MM metric tons per year [34]. The conversion of acetic acid to a solvent reduces the demand for pH neutralization during fermentation and lowers the chemical or biological oxygen demand for wastewater treatment during water recycle, as acetic acid composes half or more of soluble, unrecovered organic material in a typical lignocellulose process [35]. Finally, unlike chemical or physical methods to remove acetic acid, conversion to acetone does not require significant additional capital or operating expenditures, as new unit operations are not required beyond separation of acetone from ethanol. With these factors taken together, this technology has the potential to lower costs and improve the feasibility of large scale, anaerobic production of biofuels and biochemicals from acetate containing feedstocks.

Conclusions

Spontaneous mutations acquired in the hfs hydrogenase gene cluster prevent net acetate production in strains in which the pta and ack genes are re-introduced. Surprisingly, uptake and incorporation of exogenous acetate occurs in those strains even when overall acetate levels remain constant, as shown by 13C-labeling. Genes from C. acetobutylicum did not confer a functional acetone production pathway, but genes assembled from a variety of thermophilic species did. The best performing strain converted exogenous acetate to acetone, while markedly improving ethanol production. These findings improve our understanding of acetate and ethanol metabolism and demonstrate a novel strategy for converting a potential inhibitor into a valuable co-product.

Methods

Strains and DNA vectors

Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1, and plasmids and primers are given in Additional file 1. Plasmids used to transform T. saccharolyticum were constructed with S. cerevisiae gap repair cloning techniques and amplified in E. coli [36]. T. saccharolyticum was transformed using a natural competence based system [37], and transformants were selected by resistance to the antibiotic kanamycin. Chromosomal integrants were evaluated by colony PCR with primers which hybridized to regions external and internal to the integration region.

Fermentation conditions

T. saccharolyticum was primarily grown in modified TSC7 medium, containing per liter 1.0 g sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate, 4.0 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.2 g FeSO4•7H2O, 2.0 g MgSO4•7H2O, 1.0 g KH2PO4, 0.2 g CaCl2•2H2O, 0.12 g L-methionine, 0.5 g L-cystiene HCl, and 8.5 g yeast extract. For C13 acetate labeling experiments, TSC4 base medium was used, with the following differences from TSC7: 5 g urea replacing (NH4)2SO4, 0.5 g MgSO4•7H2O, 0.5 g KH2PO4, and 2 g sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate. Carbohydrates and acetic acid were added as indicated in the text and figure legends. Chemicals, including 13C2 acetate, were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Fermentations were begun by addition of 10% v/v from an exponentially growing pre-culture and were performed in sealed pressure vessels (120-mL bottles with a 20-mL working volume for high carbohydrate concentrations and 20-mL tubes with a 5-mL working volume for low carbohydrate concentrations. Vessels were purged with an anaerobic gas mixture containing 95% N2 and 5% CO2 and vented to atmospheric pressure at each sampling. Fermentations were performed at 55°C and shaking at 150 to 200 rpm.

Analytical methods

Fermentation metabolite concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) with a refractive index detector. Acetone was additionally identified with a UV detector at 260 nm. Proton-decoupled one-dimensional 13C spectra were obtained from fermentation samples mixed with D2O (20%) with a Varian Inova 500MHz NMR spectrometer (Bloomington, IN, USA) operating at 125 MHz using the WALTZ-16 sequence for decoupling. The sweep width was 18 kHz, and acquisition time was 1.5 s. A pulse angle of 80° and 0.8 s delay were used. Data (65,000 pts) was Fourier transformed with a line broadening of 0.5 Hz.

Ketone body formation was qualitatively assayed via the Rothera method, as described in Figure 5. Maltodextrin was hydrolyzed with A. niger amyloglucosidase according to the starch assay kit protocol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) prior to detection of glucose by HPLC. Undissociated acetic acid levels were calculated from acetate and pH measurements.

Genome re-sequencing

Descendants of the ethanologen strain M0355 evolved for improved growth rate and ethanol production via continuous culturing and chemical mutagenesis were sequenced at the National Center for Genome Resources on the Illumina platform, with each strain generating 5 to 8 million 36 bp reads. The reads were assembled onto a draft genome of wildtype T. saccharolyticum reference sequence using SeqMan NGen from DNAStar (Madison, WI, USA). SNPs, and other small mutations were manually verified by examination of the sequence assemblies and distinguished from errors in the draft genome sequence, evident as sequence differences in all strains.

Enzymatic assays

Cell-free extracts were prepared from cultures grown in 200 mL TSC7 medium with 10 g/L cellobiose at 55°C to an optical density of 1.0. Cells were chilled to 4°C, harvested aerobically by centrifugation at 8,000×g for 5 min, washed twice with 50-mL cold water, and pelleted to approximately 250-uL wet volume. Cell lysis was performed by addition of B-PER bacterial cell lysis reagent (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) with 0.1 mg lysozyme, 2.5 U DNAse I, and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride per mL of B-PER reagent. Cell extracts used for acetoacetate decarboxylase assays additionally contained 50 mM dithiothreitol. After cell re-suspension and a 30-min room temperature incubation, cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 15,000×g for 10 min. Protein concentration was determined via the Bradford method with Bio-Rad Protein Assay Reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All chemicals and enzymes were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, and reported data are the average of three replicate assays.

Thiolase was assayed in the direction of acetoacetyl-CoA cleavage, which was monitored at 303 nm with an extinction coefficient of 14.00 mM−1 cm−1 at room temperature in a Spectramax M2 plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The assay contained, in a final volume of 200 uL, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.05 mM acetoacetyl-CoA, 0.2 mM CoA and 4 μg cell-free extract. Addition of CoA started the reaction, and activity depended on both the presence of acetoacetyl-CoA and cell-free extract.

CoA-transferase was assayed in the direction of acetate and acetoacetyl-CoA conversion to acetoacetate and acetyl-CoA. To measure activity, acetyl-CoA was subsequently converted to citrate and CoA via citrate synthase, and CoA formation was monitored with 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) at 412 nm with an extinction coefficient of 14.15 mM−1 cm−1 at room temperature in a Spectramax M2 plate reader. The assay contained, in a final volume of 200 uL, 67 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM potassium acetate, 1 mM oxaloacetate, 0.1 mM DTNB, 2 U porcine heart citrate synthase, 0.2 mM acetoacetyl-CoA, 0.2 mM CoA, and 4 μg cell-free extract. Addition of acetoacetyl-CoA started the reaction, and activity depended on the presence of acetoacetyl-CoA, acetate, and cell-free extract. Control assays without added cell extract were used to subtract baseline signal.

Acetoacetate decarboxylase was assayed in the direction of acetone formation via HPLC with a Fast Acid Analysis column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with refractive index and UV detection at 260 nm. The assay contained, in a final volume of 1.8 mL, 100 mM KPO4 buffer at pH 6.1, 25 mM lithium acetoacetate and 180 μg cell-free extract. The assay began with addition of cell-free extract, and samples were taken at 70 min and frozen at −80°C until acidification to pH 2 and HPLC analysis. Control assays without added cell extract were used to subtract baseline signal.

Abbreviations

ADP: 

adenosine diphosphate

ATP: 

adenosine triphosphate

CoA: 

coenzyme A

NADH: 

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

NADPH: 

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NMR: 

nuclear magnetic resonance

RT-PCR: 

reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Wayne Casey at the Dartmouth College Department of Chemistry for assistance with NMR analysis. This work was supported by the Mascoma Corporation and the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FC36-07G017057. Manuscript preparation was supported in part by the BioEnergy Science Center, a U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Research Center supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science. Disclaimer ‘This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.’

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Mascoma Corporation
(2)
Novogy Inc.
(3)
Verdezyne Inc.
(4)
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College
(5)
Energy Biosciences Institute
(6)
Myriant Corporation
(7)
OPX Biotechnologies Inc.

References

  1. Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stoke BJ, Erbach DC. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Technical Report. 2005; ORNL/TM-205/66. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/885984.
  2. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresource Technol. 2000;74:25–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ingram LO, Aldrich HC, Borges AC, Causey TB, Martinez A, Morales F, et al. Enteric bacterial catalysts for fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol Progr. 2009;15:855–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Weil JR, Dien B, Bothast R, Hendrickson R, Mosier NS, Ladisch MR. Removal of fermentation inhibitors formed during pretreatment of biomass by polymeric adsorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:6132–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Tengborg C, Stenberg K, Zacchi G, et al. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1999;24:151–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ranatunga T, Jervis J, Helm R, McMillan J, Hatzis C. Identification of inhibitory components toxic toward Zymomonas mobilis CP4(pZB5) xylose fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotech. 1997;67:185–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sreenath HK, Jeffries TW. Production of ethanol from wood hydrolyzate by yeasts. Bioresource Technol. 2000;72:253–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Lidén G. Acetic acid - friend or foe in anaerobic batch conversion of glucose to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Chem Eng Sci. 1997;52:2653–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawford H, Rousseau J. Improving fermentation performance of recombinant Zymomonas in acetic acid-containing media. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1998;70-72:161–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth IR. Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1985;49:359–78.Google Scholar
  11. Mussatto SI, Roberto IC. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: a review. Bioresource Technol. 2004;93:1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Schneider H. Selective removal of acetic acid from hardwood-spent sulfite liquor using a mutant yeast. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1996;19:94–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lakshmanaswamy A, Rajaraman E, Eiteman MA, Altman E. Microbial removal of acetate selectively from sugar mixtures. J Ind Microbiol Biot. 2011;38:1477–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones DT, Woods DR. Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50:484–524.Google Scholar
  15. Lütke-Eversloh T, Bahl H. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum: recent advances to improve butanol production. Curr Opin Biotech. 2011;22:634–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Shaw AJ, Covalla SF, Hogsett DA, Herring CD. Marker removal system for Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum and development of a markerless ethanologen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:2534–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw AJ, Podkaminer KK, Desai SG, Bardsley JS, Rogers SR, Thorne PG, et al. Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13769–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Shaw AJ, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR. Identification of the [FeFe]-hydrogenase responsible for hydrogen generation in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum and demonstration of increased ethanol yield via hydrogenase knockout. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6457–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolfe AJ. The acetate switch. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005;69:12–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumari S, Tishel R, Eisenbach M, Wolfe AJ. Cloning, characterization, and functional expression of acs, the gene which encodes acetyl coenzyme A synthetase in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:2878–86.Google Scholar
  21. Fournier GP, Gogarten JP. Evolution of acetoclastic methanogenesis in Methanosarcina via horizontal gene transfer from cellulolytic clostridia. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1124–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingram-Smith C, Martin SR, Smith KS. Acetate kinase: not just a bacterial enzyme. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14:249–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Weimer PJ. Control of product formation during glucose fermentation by Bacillus macerans. J Gen Microbiol. 1984;130:103–11.Google Scholar
  24. Freier-Schröder D, Wiegel J, Gottschalk G. Butanol formation by Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum at neutral pH. Biotechnol Lett. 1989;11:831–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Desai SG, Guerinot ML, Lynd LR. Cloning of L-lactate dehydrogenase and elimination of lactic acid production via gene knockout in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum JW/SL-YS485. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;65:600–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ballor N, Paulsen I, Leadbetter J. Genomic analysis reveals multiple [FeFe] hydrogenases and hydrogen sensors encoded by treponemes from the H2-rich termite gut. Microb Ecol. 2012;63:282–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Posewitz MC, Mulder DW, Peters JW. New frontiers in hydrogenase structure and biosynthesis. Curr Chem Biol. 2008;2:178–99.Google Scholar
  28. Calusinska M, Happe T, Joris B, Wilmotte A. The surprising diversity of clostridial hydrogenases: a comparative genomic perspective. Microbiol. 2010;156:1575–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Björkqvist S, Ansell R, Adler L, Lidén G. Physiological response to anaerobicity of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:128–32.Google Scholar
  30. Van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1986;32:199–224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ansell R, Granath K, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Adler L. The two isoenzymes for yeast NAD + -dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation. EMBO J. 1997;16:2179–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Brown SD, Guss AM, Karpinets TV, Parks JM, Smolin N, Yang S, et al. Mutant alcohol dehydrogenase leads to improved ethanol tolerance in Clostridium thermocellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:13752–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mariano AP, Dias MOS, Junqueira TL, Cunha MP, Bonomi A, Filho RM. Butanol production in a first-generation Brazilian sugarcane biorefinery: technical aspects and economics of greenfield projects. Bioresource Technol. 2013;135:316–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Acetone uses and market data. Technical Report. Independent Commodity Information Services; ICIS News. 2007 09:34, updated 2010.Google Scholar
  35. Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, et al. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. Technical Report. 2002; NREL/TP-510-32438, NREL, Golden, CO. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/15001119.
  36. Shanks RMQ, Kadouri DE, MacEachran DP, O’Toole GA. New yeast recombineering tools for bacteria. Plasmid. 2009;62:88–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaw AJ, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR. Natural competence in Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:4713–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shaw et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement