Open Access

Awakening the endogenous Leloir pathway for efficient galactose utilization by Yarrowia lipolytica

  • Zbigniew Lazar1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Heber Gamboa-Meléndez1, 2,
  • Anne-Marie Crutz- Le Coq1, 2,
  • Cécile Neuvéglise1, 2 and
  • Jean-Marc Nicaud1, 2
Biotechnology for Biofuels20158:185

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0370-4

Received: 3 July 2015

Accepted: 28 October 2015

Published: 25 November 2015

Abstract

Background

Production of valuable metabolites by Yarrowia lipolytica using renewable raw materials is of major interest for sustainable food and energy. Galactose is a monosaccharide found in galactomannans, hemicelluloses, gums, and pectins.

Results

Yarrowia lipolytica was found to express all the Leloir pathway genes for galactose utilization, which encode fully functional proteins. Gene organization and regulation in Y. lipolytica resembles filamentous fungi rather than Saccharomyces cerevisiae. After Y. lipolytica was grown on mixture of glucose and galactose, it was then able to metabolize galactose, including when glucose concentrations were higher than 4 g/L. However, glucose was still the preferred carbon source. Nonetheless, a strain overexpressing the four ylGAL genes of the Leloir pathway was able to efficiently use galactose as its sole carbon source. This mutant was used to produce citric acid and lipids from galactose; the yields were comparable to or greater than that obtained for the parental strain (W29) on glucose.

Conclusions

The construction of a Y. lipolytica strain able to produce citric acid and lipids from galactose is a very important step in bypassing issues related to the use of food-based substrates in industrial applications.

Keywords

Galactose GAL genes Citric acid Lipid accumulation Single-cell oil Yeasts Metabolic pathways

Background

Compounds such as citric acid, lipids, or sugar alcohols are of industrial interest; as a consequence, using microbes such as Yarrowia lipolytica to produce them has spurred research around the world [13]. From an economic and social point of view, it is very important to identify raw materials that could serve as cheap and renewable substrates and that are not already in demand for food production. Therefore, at present, research efforts are focused on using plant biomass, which contains a diversity of sugars, for the production of these valuable compounds [4]. One such sugar is d-galactose, a monosaccharide that is a C4 epimer of glucose. The polysaccharides found in plant cell walls (e.g., galactomannans), gums, hemicelluloses, and pectins are rich sources of galactose [5]. Galactose also occurs naturally in milk; lactose is made up of galactose and glucose. Both milk and plant biomass are readily exploited by many microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, and fungi. These diverse species utilize similar pathways to break down galactose. For example, the bacterium Azotobacter vinelandii uses the non-phosphorylative DeLey-Doudoroff pathway to metabolize galactose. Galactose is oxidized, forming galactonate, which is ultimately broken down into pyruvate and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate [6]. Another pathway, the oxido-reductive pathway, exists in filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus niger or Hypocrea jecorina; it involves a series of redox reactions that convert galactose to d-fructose [7]. However, the best-known and best-studied pathway is the Leloir pathway, which occurs in many organisms, including yeasts (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis) [8, 9]. Via this phosphorylative pathway, d-galactose is converted to glucose-6-phosphate (Fig. 1a). In S. cerevisiae, β-d-galactose is first converted to its α-anomer by galactose mutarotase (scGAL10, YBR019C); only this anomeric form can be utilized by cells. Subsequently, α-d-galactose is phosphorylated by galactokinase (scGAL1, YBR020W), releasing galactose-1-phosphate. Then, galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (scGAL7, YBR018C) converts this intermediate compound into UDP-galactose, simultaneously releasing glucose-1-phosphate. In the last step of the pathway, UDP-galactose is epimerized into UDP-glucose by UDP-glucose 4-epimerase (scGAL10, YBR019C). It is worth noting that, in S. cerevisiae and other Ascomycetes, the epimerase and mutarotase domains are fused together but act independently (Fig. 1b) [10]. In addition, the mutarotase domain is not essential to galactose metabolism because the sugar anomers interconvert spontaneously in water [11]. Phosphoglucomutase converts the glucose-1-phosphate released by the pathway to glucose-6-phosphate, an intermediate compound in glycolysis. However, because phosphoglucomutase is also involved in glycogenolysis, it is not formally considered to be part of the Leloir pathway.
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the Leloir pathway of galactose metabolism in Y. lipolytica (a), and GAL genes organization in the S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica genomes (b)

In the well-studied yeast S. cerevisiae, the structural scGAL genes (scGAL1, scGAL7, scGAL10) are clustered and subject to strong transcriptional regulation [9, 12]. Activation of these genes occurs in the presence of galactose, but in the absence of glucose, under the action of regulatory proteins—Gal4p (activator), Gal80p (inhibitor), and Gal3p (activator and ohnolog of GAL1, which has a regulatory function but lacks catalytic activity). On the other hand, repression of scGAL genes occurs in the presence of glucose and involves, among others, the transcriptional repressor Mig1p [13]. In addition (also in the presence of glucose), galactose uptake is inactivated through degradation of the galactose transporter Gal2p [14]. Unlike S. cerevisiae, the Gal3p does not exist in the yeast K. lactis, while Gal1p is responsible for both enzymatic and regulatory activities [8]. Furthermore, in the latter yeast, GAL genes were shown to be semiconstitutively expressed at low levels and induced during the stationary phase [15].

In filamentous fungi, the Leloir genes are not clustered as they are in S. cerevisiae and K. lactis [10]. Moreover, in H. jecorina, A. niger, and Aspergillus nidulans, they exhibited a high basal expression levels on various carbon sources such as glucose, arabinose, xylose, lactose, cellobiose, or glycerol [5, 1621]. This finding indicates that important differences exist in galactose metabolism regulation in filamentous fungi versus in S. cerevisiae. The first and the most significant difference is the presence of at least two different pathways in the genomes of filamentous fungi [7, 17, 18]. Another difference is that proteins that regulate galactose utilization in S. cerevisiae—such as Gal4p—are not found in their genomes [16]. However, other proteins regulating galactose metabolism are found in A. nidulans (GalR and GalX) [5] and other aspergilli (GalX) [5]. In addition, glucose does not cause carbon catabolite repression of the GAL pathway in filamentous fungi [16, 17]. All these data indicate that the regulation of the Leloir pathway (or its mechanism) described in S. cerevisiae is not conserved in other Ascomycetes [16].

Yarrowia lipolytica is a dimorphic yeast that belongs to the subphylum Saccharomycotina. Its genome contains all the Leloir genes (Fig. 1a), scattered on different chromosomes as in H. jecorina (Fig. 1b) [10]. In addition, the UDP-glucose-4-epimerase and galactose mutarotase are encoded by two different genes in both Y. lipolytica and H. jecorina [10, 17, 18]. However, the Y. lipolytica species is unable to use galactose as its sole carbon source. Therefore, the objective of this study was to figure out whether these genes are even expressed and whether they encode fully functional proteins. The goal was also to determine the culture conditions under which Y. lipolytica cells use galactose as a carbon source. Above all, the aim was to construct a Y. lipolytica strain that could utilize galactose efficiently and be used for different biotechnological applications. For instance, galactose-containing raw materials, such as polysaccharides obtained from plant cell walls (i.e., hemicelluloses), could eventually supplant food-based substrates in industrial applications.

Results and discussion

The yeast Y. lipolytica is able to use a few monosaccharides as carbon sources, namely glucose, fructose, and mannose [22]. However, in contrast to S. cerevisiae, none of the Y. lipolytica WT strains are able to utilize pure galactose.

Structural and regulatory genes for the Leloir pathway in Yarrowia lipolytica

The conservation of the Leloir pathway proteins was examined. The proposed nomenclature of the ylGAL genes will be used in this paper as follows: ylGAL1 (YALI0C13090g, galactokinase), ylGAL7 (YALI0F23947g, galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase), ylGAL10E (YALI0E26829g, UDP-glucose-4 Epimerase), and ylGAL10M (YALI0C09570g, galactose Mutarotase). In Y. lipolytica, UDP-glucose-4 epimerase (ylGAL10E) is the most conserved of the GAL proteins also found in S. cerevisiae and H. jecorina (69–76 % amino-acid similarity), whereas galactose mutarotase (ylGAL10 M) is the least conserved (36–42 % similar) (Table 1; http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Although the structural genes necessary for galactose utilization are present in Y. lipolytica, the genes encoding regulatory proteins in S. cerevisiae (i.e., scGAL3, scGAL4, and scGAL80) were not found. Furthermore, GAL4-binding sites are not present in the promoter regions of ylGAL genes (data not shown), which is also the case for H. jecorina [18]. Despite this fact, H. jecorina is able to grow well on galactose. Past work has shown that the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe also contains all of the Leloir genes but fails to grow when galactose is the sole available carbon source [23]. The MIG1 gene (YALI0E07942g), which homolog represses expression of GAL genes in S. cerevisiae, has been identified in Y. lipolytica [24]. Disruption of ylMIG1 did not result in growth of Y. lipolytica on galactose (data not shown).
Table 1

Comparison of GAL genes among Y. lipolytica, S. cerevisiae, and H. jecorina

Enzyme name

Y. lipolytica

S. cerevisiae

Identity (%)

Similarity (%)

Hypocrea jecorina

Identity (%)

Similarity (%)

Abbreviation

Gene

Protein length

Abbreviation

Gene

Protein length

Abbreviation

Locus

Protein length

Galactokinase

ylGAL1

YALI0C13090g

476aa

scGAL1

YBR020w

528aa

40

55

Gal1

XP_006961307

526aa

40

56

Galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase

ylGAL7

YALI0F23947g

352aa

scGAL7

YBR018c

366aa

49

63

Gal7

XP_006968597

382aa

49

61

UDP-glucose-4-Epimerase

ylGAL10E

YALI0E26829g

369aa

scGAL10a

YBR019c

699aa

62

76

Gal10E

AF439323_1

370aa

59

69

ylGAL10M

YALI0C09570g

327aa

26

42

Gal10 M

XP_006964994

342aa

29

36

aIn S. cerevisiae, the GAL10 gene contains two domains: epimerase and mutarotase (Fig. 1)

Yarrowia lipolytica GAL genes are expressed

To examine ylGAL gene expression, Y. lipolytica was grown in 1.0 % glucose medium followed by its transfer to a suite of media containing two different concentrations (0.1 and 1.0 %) of three different monosaccharides (galactose, glucose, and mannose), and transcription analyses were performed (Fig. 2a; for details see “Methods”). Galactose was the target compound, glucose was a potential repressor, and mannose was a neutral sugar in catabolite repression. The three main ylGAL genes (ylGAL1, ylGAL7, ylGAL10E) were expressed under all the conditions, but ylGAL10M, the least important gene in galactose utilization, showed very weak expression (Fig. 2a). This pattern is similar to that observed in H. jecorina [17, 19]. Because the ylGAL genes were expressed when Y. lipolytica was grown on glucose, it appears that they are not subject to catabolic repression as they are in S. cerevisiae [12, 13]. A similar pattern was observed in A. niger, which shows poor growth on galactose, even though all of its Leloir orthologs are expressed on all the carbon sources studied [20].
Fig. 2

Expression profiles of ylGAL genes in Y. lipolytica W29. Cells were first growing for 16 h in YNB medium with 1.0 % of glucose and then incubated for 3–24 h in YNB medium containing the indicated sugar at 0.1 or 1.0 %. End-point RT-PCR was performed after 3 h incubation in glucose, mannose, or galactose (a). Kinetics of ylGAL genes expression was monitored by quantitative RT-PCR in Y. lipolytica W29 incubated in YNB medium containing 1.0 % glucose (b), 1.0 % galactose (c), or a mixture of 1.0 % glucose and 1.0 % galactose (d). Gene expression levels were normalized based on the expression levels of the actin gene (ΔC T). In inoculum

Since the ylGAL genes were not repressed by glucose, a kinetics analysis of their quantitative expression on glucose, galactose and mixture of both was conducted (Fig. 2b–d). The gene profiles show that, on glucose, expression of the UDP-glucose-4-epimerase gene (ylGAL10E) was constant, whereas expression of galactokinase (ylGAL1) and galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase (ylGAL7) genes increased after 24 h (Fig. 2b). Once again, the galactose mutarotase gene (ylGAL10M) had the lowest expression levels. On galactose, there was a slight increase in expression of ylGAL genes (ylGAL1, ylGAL7, ylGAL10E) over time: it reached between 2.7 and 4.6 after 24 h (Fig. 2c). Therefore, the ylGAL genes were upregulated in the presence of galactose. The expression of ylGAL genes in the mixture of 1.0 % glucose and 1.0 % galactose (Fig. 2d) resembled the expression profile of these genes on 1.0 % glucose (Fig. 2b), except for ylGAL10E gene which was more than 10 times upregulated by the presence of galactose in the medium (Fig. 2d). This result indicates that in Y. lipolytica, the ylGAL genes are not subject of glucose catabolite repression since ylGAL10E can be upregulated by galactose also in the presence of glucose. In A. nidulans and H. jecorina, galD (GAL7) and galE (GAL1) have also been reported to be upregulated in the presence of galactose versus glucose [17, 19, 21]. However, in contrast to ylGAL10E gene, which is also upregulated by galactose, the expression of its homolog GAL10 of H. jecorina is not improved by this sugar [16, 18].

Yarrowia lipolytica GAL genes are functional

To investigate the activity of the proteins encoded by the Y. lipolytica GAL genes, a functional complementation test was performed using S. cerevisiae. The ylGAL genes were amplified and cloned into a multicopy pRS426 vector under the control of the scTEF promoter. The S. cerevisiae transformants obtained were subsequently tested to determine if they could grow when galactose was the sole carbon source (Fig. 3). The three cloned ylGAL genes, ylGAL1, ylGAL7, and ylGAL10E, complemented their corresponding S. cerevisiae GAL-deletion mutants and restored growth on galactose. This result shows that the ylGAL genes encode functional Leloir proteins. The fact that the S. cerevisiae mutant (depleted for both epimerase and mutarotase functions) expressing only the ylGAL10E gene demonstrated growth, while the mutant expressing the ylGAL10M gene did not confirm what Seiboth et al. [18] found: that the epimerase, not the mutarotase, activity of scGAL10 is required for S. cerevisiae to be able to use galactose as a sole carbon source [11]. Because K. lactis galactokinase demonstrates two activities—it acts as an enzyme and a regulatory protein [8]—the putative regulatory function of Y. lipolytica galactokinase was also examined. The ylGAL1p gene, which complemented the S. cerevisiae ΔGAL1 mutant, was not able to restore normal growth on galactose for the S. cerevisiae ΔGAL3 mutant (Fig. 3), in contrast to its K. lactis counterpart [8]. ScGAL3, which is an ohnolog of scGAL1, diverged after a whole genome duplication event, losing the ancestral gene’s enzymatic activity but retaining its regulatory function. This finding suggests that ylGAL1 does not share scGAL3’s regulatory role; this function was either lost in Y. lipolytica over the course of evolution, or acquired later in hemiascomycetes (perhaps at the base of the Saccharomycetaceae branch).
Fig. 3

Complementation of GAL gene deletion in S. cerevisiae using GAL homologs found in Y. lipolytica. EV—strains complemented for uracil deletion using a pRS426TEF empty vector

Validation of Leloir pathway functionality in Yarrowia lipolytica

Given the evidence that the Leloir pathway was potentially functional in Y. lipolytica, galactose utilization by the species was investigated (Fig. 4). The ylGAL genes were expressed when the yeast was grown on glucose, but galactose alone did not allow growth. As a result, growth and sugar consumption by Y. lipolytica W29 (the wild-type strain) in YNB medium containing a mixture of glucose and galactose (0.1 or 1.0 %) were analyzed. First, a control experiment was conducted in which growth and sugar consumption on glucose versus galactose were examined. As expected, when galactose was the sole carbon source, it was not consumed, whereas 0.1 and 1.0 % glucose were depleted within 12 and 32 h, respectively (Fig. 4a, c). Surprisingly, when the same strain was grown in medium containing both 0.1 % glucose and 0.1 % galactose, it was able to use both sugars (Fig. 4b). The specific glucose utilization rate was the same as for the glucose-only culture (0.60 ± 0.04 g/g/h). In contrast, the specific galactose utilization rate reached ten times lower value than the one for glucose (0.060 ± 0.005 g/g/h) and remained constant through the process. In addition, sugar consumption was also tested using cultures containing higher concentrations of both monosaccharides (1 %) to eliminate the influence of any putative sugar sensors, which could change carbon metabolism (Fig. 4d). As in the previous experiment, Y. lipolytica W29 used both glucose and galactose from the beginning, but the glucose consumption rate was much higher than the galactose consumption rate (0.15 ± 0.01 g/g/h versus 0.030 ± 0.003 g/g/h, respectively). It is worth noting that, not only was galactose consumed by the cells, but it was also partially used for biomass production (Fig. 4b, d). In addition, deletion of ylGAL10E gene resulted in dramatic decrease of galactose consumption (Additional file 1), stating the involvement of the Leloir pathway in galactose utilization.
Fig. 4

Changes in concentration of sugars and growth during cultures of Y. lipolytica W29 in YNB medium with glucose and galactose. a YNB medium with single 0.1 % glucose or 0.1 % galactose, b YNB medium with mixture of 0.1 % glucose and 0.1 % galactose, c YNB medium with single 1 % glucose or 1 % galactose, d YNB medium with mixture of 1 % glucose and 1 % galactose. Glucose (filled diamond), galactose (filled square), optical density of cells growing in cultures with—glucose (filled triangle), galactose (filled circle), mixture of glucose and galactose (unfilled triangle)

The next step was therefore to determine the concentration of glucose that Y. lipolytica requires to be able to use galactose. Y. lipolytica W29 was therefore grown in a suite of media containing 1.0 % galactose and a range of glucose, from 0.1 to 1.0 %. At a glucose concentration of 0.1 %, growth was very weak and galactose was not consumed (Fig. 5a). At higher glucose concentrations (0.2–0.4 %), a small amount of galactose was also utilized; however, after the glucose was used up, galactose consumption stopped (Fig. 5b, c). At even higher glucose concentrations, Y. lipolytica consumed galactose more efficiently, following a short delay (Fig. 5d–f). Galactose consumption increased once the glucose had been drained from the medium, which is also when the cells enter into the stationary phase (Fig. 5d–f). The fact that Y. lipolytica needs glucose concentrations to be higher than 0.4 % to efficiently use galactose suggests that it first requires access to a metabolically favorable carbon source that promotes growth and viability before it can use galactose. This phenomenon could result because Y. lipolytica is strictly aerobic, and the large amount of energy required to synthesize Leloir proteins cannot be acquired when the yeast begins its growth on galactose. In S. cerevisiae exposed to oxygen-limited conditions, when the yeast is switched from glucose to galactose, energy levels rapidly drop, and Leloir proteins are not synthesized in sufficient quantities to make galactose utilization possible [25]. However, this explanation for the observed Y. lipolytica phenotype must be investigated further.
Fig. 5

Comparison of growth and sugar utilization of Y. lipolytica W29 in YNB medium with 1 % galactose and different concentration of glucose: 0.1 % (a); 0.2 % (b); 0.4 % (c); 0.6 % (d); 0.8 % (e); 1.0 % (f). Glucose (filled diamond), galactose (filled square), OD600 (filled triangle)

Overexpression of all Yarrowia lipolytica GAL genes induces efficient growth on galactose

Because Y. lipolytica’s GAL genes were found to be functional, the goal became to see if it was possible to improve the Leloir pathway such that Y. lipolytica could efficiently use galactose as a sole carbon source. All the ylGAL genes were placed under the control of the strong constitutive TEF promoter and introduced individually or in various combinations into the Y. lipolytica PO1d background. The resulting strains were then tested to see if they could grow on galactose alone. When the transformants were grown on glucose, they showed normal growth and no morphological changes, suggesting that their physiology was not affected (Fig. 6a). Only mutants in which ylGAL1, ylGAL7, and ylGAL10E were simultaneously overexpressed could grow within 48 h on both, 0.1 and 1.0 % galactose (Fig. 6a, line 12). Mutarotase activity, which is not required for galactose metabolism, nonetheless appeared to slightly improve galactose utilization (Fig. 6a, line 15). Interestingly, the overexpression of all the S. cerevisiae Leloir genes in Y. lipolytica was not efficient and resulted in weak, delayed growth (Additional file 2A). Additional analysis of growth patterns showed that the Y. lipolytica transformants overexpressing the ylGAL genes, with the exception of Y4585 and Y4588, took a long time to grow on galactose. The Y4577 strain, in which ylGAL1 and ylGAL7 were overexpressed, showed visible growth after 2 weeks of incubation but revealed normal morphology on plates (Additional file 2B). This fact supports the observation, that the native ylGAL10E expression is higher than that of the rest of the ylGAL genes, but needs time for it to reach an efficient level. In addition, the Y4578 strain, in which ylGAL1 and ylGAL10E were overexpressed, also showed visible growth after 2 weeks of incubation, albeit much less efficient than Y4577 (Additional file 2B). This finding underscores that ylGAL7 expression results in functional protein biosynthesis but not normal levels for galactose utilization in the whole cell population.
Fig. 6

Functional analysis of Leloir pathway overexpression in Y. lipolytica and fold change in the expression of the ylGAL genes. Growth of different Y. lipolytica transformants overexpressing ylGAL and scGAL genes on plates of YNB medium containing glucose or galactose—incubation at 28 °C, 48 h (a). Fold changes in the expression of ylGAL genes in the quadruple mutant, Y4588 (in which all the Leloir genes were overexpressed), relative to Y. lipolytica W29 (the wild-type strain) (b); yeast were incubated for 3 h in YNB medium containing 0.1 or 1.0 % galactose. Gene expression levels were normalized based on the expression of the actin gene

The strong increase in gene expression in the quadruple mutant (Y4588) showed that, when galactose concentrations were low, each gene was overexpressed compared to the parental strain; for instance, expression was 400 times higher for ylGAL10M (Fig. 6b). Surprisingly, when galactose concentrations were high (1.0 %), the change in gene expression levels was not so sharp, especially in the case of ylGAL10E. The parental strain expresses ylGAL10E at high levels when grown in 1.0 % galactose, which could explain why the overexpression of this particular gene did not increase transcript levels (Fig. 6b). Overexpressing all four of the ylGAL genes efficiently activated the Leloir pathway and created a strain that can use galactose as its sole carbon source.

Sugar utilization kinetics and transporters’ expression in Yarrowia lipolytica overexpressing ylGAL genes

Glucose must be present in the culture medium for the Y. lipolytica wild-type (W29) strain to be able to utilize galactose. Overexpression of all the genes in the Leloir pathway allowed Y. lipolytica cells to grow on media whose sole carbon source was galactose. The next step was to determine if glucose had an effect on galactose utilization in the Y. lipolytica quadruple mutant (Y4588). To this end, its growth and sugar utilization in 1 % glucose, 1 % galactose, and a mixture of 1 % glucose and 1 % galactose were characterized. The kinetics of sugar consumption were the same when the strain was grown in the single sugar cultures, reaching a specific consumption rate of 0.13–14 ± 0.01 g/g/h; slightly more biomass was produced when the strain was grown on glucose alone (Fig. 7a). However, sugar utilization dynamics changed in the mixed medium (Fig. 7b). During the exponential growth phase, the specific glucose and galactose utilization rates were 0.13 ± 0.01 and 0.040 ± 0.003 g/g/h, respectively, while during the stationary phase, both values decreased to 0.020 ± 0.001 and 0.030 ± 0.003 g/g/h for glucose and galactose, respectively. This same pattern was also seen at lower concentrations of both sugars (0.1 and 0.5 %, respectively; data not shown). Overall, growth and sugar consumption were the same on the glucose-only and mixed-sugar media; for instance, at 18 h of incubation, consumption was around 5.5–6 g/L for both (Fig. 7). Even though the galactose utilization pathway had clearly been activated, glucose was obviously the preferred carbon source.
Fig. 7

Yarrowia lipolytica Y4588 growth and sugar consumption over 48 h in YNB medium containing only 1 % glucose, only 1 % galactose (a), or a mixture of both 1 % glucose and 1 % galactose (b). Glucose (filled diamond), galactose (filled square), OD600 in glucose (filled triangle), OD600 in galactose (filled circle), and OD600 in the mixture of both sugars (x)

The transport of galactose inside the cell is the first step in the metabolic process. It may be modified in the quadruple mutant or may be affected by the presence of glucose. In Y. lipolytica, six genes have been identified as hexose transporters from a HXT-like family; they have been named in series, YHT1 to YHT6, and have been reported to transport galactose (Lazar et al., in preparation; [26]). The uptake efficiency of both galactose and glucose was compared in S. cerevisiae hxt null mutants transformed with each of these six genes (Additional file 3A). Four of the transporters, YHT1–YHT4, allowed significant galactose or glucose consumption; uptake efficiency, however, varied (Additional file 3A). Only two of the transporters, YHT1 and YHT4, were expressed at high levels in Y. lipolytica Y4588 strain grown in either 1 % glucose or 1 % galactose, similarly as in the W29 (WT) strain (Additional file 3B). These findings suggest that this set of galactose transporters is affected neither by the genetic background (WT or Y4588) nor by the carbon source. Because galactose consumption was much slower in the presence of glucose, it can be hypothesized that galactose transport was somehow inhibited due to competition with glucose, even if their expression was not repressed. However, potential interactions between glucose metabolism and galactose metabolism cannot be excluded.

Galactose is a good substrate for industrial processes using Yarrowia lipolytica

To confirm that galactose could be effectively used in industrial applications (e.g., the Y. lipolytica Y4588 strain could efficiently produce citric acid and lipids), batch cultures were raised in flasks and bioreactors. All the biomass, citric acid, and lipid production results are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Biomass, citric acid, and lipid production

Parameter

X (g/L)

Y X/S (g/g)

CA (g/L)

Y CA/S (g/g)

Y CA/X (g/g)

FA (g/L)

Y FA/S (g/g)

Y FA/X (g/g)

Flasks

 Glu 6 % (C/N 60)

W29

11.15

0.24

4.18

0.09

0.37

1.92

0.041

0.172

Y4588

10.90

0.21

18.17

0.35

1.67

1.87

0.036

0.172

 Gal 6 % (C/N 60)

11.27

0.19

12.58

0.22

1.12

1.98

0.034

0.176

 Gal 6 % (C/N 100)

8.45

0.17

16.96

0.35

2.01

1.79

0.037

0.212

Bioreactors

 Gal 6 % (C/N 100)

Y4588

19.4

0.34

29.2

0.51

1.51

3.22

0.056

0.166

Y. lipolytica W29 and Y4588 strains were grown for 96 h in YNB medium containing 6 % glucose or 6 % galactose in flasks and bioreactors

In this analysis, SD did not exceed 7.5 %

X dry biomass, FA fatty acids, CA citric acid, Y X/S yield of biomass from substrate consumed, Y CA/S yield of citric acid from substrate consumed, Y CA/X yield of citric acid from dry biomass, Y FA/S yield of fatty acids from substrate consumed, Y FA/X yield of fatty acids from dry biomass

The Y. lipolytica wild-type (W29) and quadruple mutant (Y4588) strains produced similar amounts of biomass (~11 g/L) when grown in both glucose and galactose media with C/N ratio of 60. Biomass yield ranged from 0.19 to 0.24 g/g. When the C/N ratio of the galactose medium was increased to 100, biomass yield decreased slightly (11 %).

Interestingly, in glucose, citric acid biosynthesis and yield were around four times higher for Y4588 than for W29. Furthermore, Y4588 was able to produce three times more citric acid from galactose (C/N 60) than did W29 grown in glucose. Finally, when the C/N ratio was increased to 100, biomass and citric acid yield from galactose increased by 55 and 37 %, respectively.

Galactose could also be used to efficiently produce lipids. In glucose with a C/N ratio of 60, W29 and Y4588 produced similar amounts of total lipids. Y4588 was able to produce comparable amounts of total lipids in galactose- and glucose-only media (Table 2). Lipid yields for W29 and Y4588 ranged between 0.034 and 0.041 g/g. In addition, increasing the C/N ratio to 100 improved the lipid accumulation by 20 %; it reached 0.212 g/g. W29 had similar or lower yields when grown in glucose or fructose media with the same C/N ratio [2].

To study Y4588’s ability to produce citric acid and lipids in large quantities, the process was scaled up production by using 2-L bioreactors; this approach was informed by previous results obtained for galactose flask cultures (C/N ratio of 100). Overall, biomass, citric acid, and lipid production were dramatically improved (Table 2). Up to 19.4 g/L of biomass was produced under these conditions, representing an increase of 100 %. Citric acid production reached 29.2 g/L and thus the conversion of substrate to citric acid was improved by 31 %. In addition, the lipid production increased from 1.79 to 3.22 g/L, which signifies that 34 % more galactose was converted into lipids. The construction of a Y. lipolytica strain that is able to produce citric acid and lipids from galactose is a very important step in bypassing issues related to the use of food-based substrates in industrial applications. In addition, it will be important to activate the Leloir pathway in a strain optimized for lipid accumulation to reach as high titer of biolipids from galactose as recently reported by Qiao et al. from glucose [27]. Activation of the Leloir pathway in a strain described recently by Lazar et al. [2] is currently in progress.

Conclusions

Galactose is potentially a useful alternative source of carbon for microbiological industrial processes. Our research on the Leloir pathway of galactose utilization in Y. lipolytica has revealed that this yeast is more similar to filamentous fungi such as H. jecorina, A. nidulans, and A. niger than to S. cerevisiae and K. lactis in terms of its genetic organization and gene regulation. The ylGAL genes are not repressed by glucose and are upregulated by galactose. They encode fully functional proteins. Hexose transporters genes involved in galactose transport are expressed on both, glucose and galactose: however, galactose transport is likely inhibited by substrate competition. In addition, ylGAL genes are not expressed enough in wild-type Y. lipolytica to allow growth on galactose. A very efficient galactose-metabolizing Y. lipolytica strain was created by fully activating the Leloir pathway, making it possible to use this sugar as a substrate in biotechnological applications. This yeast can be successfully used in citric acid and lipid production; making these processes more effective is currently the focus of intensive research worldwide. The use of galactose as an industrial substrate is especially appealing because it is a component of hemicelluloses and is also found in pectins. Consequently, its metabolism by genetically modified microbes may make it possible to efficiently exploit lignocellulosic biomass for biotechnological purposes, reducing the need to use substrates that are already in demand for food production.

Methods

Yeast strains and plasmids

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Additional file 4. All the Y. lipolytica transformants derived from the genetic background of the W29 wild-type strain and of the derivative auxotrophic strain PO1d (UraLeu) [28]. Because many strains of various kinds overexpressing Y. lipolytica GAL genes were created, only the—quadruple overexpressing strain, Y4588, which overexpressed all four of the ylGAL genes, will be described in detail here. Construction of the other strains is depicted in Fig. 8. Plasmids containing ylGAL genes were constructed using URA3ex and LEU2ex selection markers. Strain Y4573, which overexpressed the Y. lipolytica ylGAL1 gene (YALI0C13090g), was obtained by introducing the overexpression cassette from JME2542 containing the URA3ex selection marker into PO1d. Subsequently, the cassette containing the ylGAL7 gene (YALI0F23947g) and a LEU2ex marker taken from JME2547 was introduced into the Y4573 strain, thus generating the prototrophic Y4577 strain. To excise both selection markers, Y4577 was transformed with JME547 plasmid containing Cre-Lox recombinase and hygromycin selection. This process generated the auxotrophic Y4583 strain (UraLeu). Immediately afterward, the ylGAL10E gene (YALI0E26829g) overexpression cassette containing the LEU2ex marker from a JME2548 plasmid was introduced into the Y4583. Then, the cassette containing the ylGAL10M gene (YALI0C09570g) and the URA3ex marker taken from a JME2545 plasmid was introduced, generating Y4588, which overexpressed the entire Leloir pathway.
Fig. 8

Construction of Y. lipolytica strains overexpressing ylGAL genes. The auxotrophic PO1d strain was used as the acceptor strain. The genes were inserted one by one to create strains that overexpressed different combinations of the ylGAL genes; URA3ex and LEU2ex were used as selection markers. To recover prototrophy in some of the Y. lipolytica strains (gray squares), cassettes containing the URA3 excisable marker or the purified SalI fragment of a pINA62 plasmid that contained the LEU2 gene were inserted into the transformants’ genomes [28]. In turn, to recover URA3 and LEU2 auxotrophy, which was necessary to continue the transformation process, a JME547 plasmid containing Cre-Lox recombinase was used [35]

The strain Y. lipolytica YLZ68 was obtained by transformation of PO1d strain with NotI digested fragment of ZLE19 vector for ylGAL10E gene deletion with URA3ex as selection marker. To recover prototrophy, a purified SalI fragment of the pINA62 plasmid that contained the LEU2 gene was introduced [29].

Yarrowia lipolytica strains expressing S. cerevisiae GAL genes were constructed as depicted in Additional file 5. All the plasmids were prepared as described above.

Functional complementation analysis of the Y. lipolytica GAL genes was performed using S. cerevisiae strains from which the GAL genes had been deleted. The Y. lipolytica galactokinase (ylGAL1) gene was introduced into S. cerevisiae Δgal1 (Y4475) as well as into the Δgal3 (Y4846) strains using JME2735 plasmid, thus generating the Y4595 and Y4875 strains, respectively. To complement the Δgal7 strain, a JME2736 plasmid (ylGAL7) was introduced into Y4473, generating Y4596. Finally, Δgal10 was complemented separately by the ylGAL10E and ylGAL10M genes, which was accomplished by introducing JME2738 and JME2739 plasmids into the Y4474 strain, yielding Y4597 and Y4690, respectively. All the S. cerevisiae deletion mutants—the control strains—were also complemented for uracil auxotrophy by the insertion of an empty pRS426TEF vector.

All the genes introduced into Y. lipolytica and S. cerevisiae were under the control of the constitutive TEF promoter [30]. Yeast transformation was performed using the lithium acetate procedure [31]. Expression cassettes were integrated into the genome of Y. lipolytica [32] or were in the replicative pRS426TEF vector in S. cerevisiae [30].

General genetic techniques and plasmid construction

Standard molecular genetics techniques were used throughout this study [33]. Restriction enzymes were obtained from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, England). Genomic DNA from the transformants was prepared using phenol:chlorophorm extraction method. PCR amplification was performed using an Eppendorf 2720 thermal cycler; both Taq (Promega, Madison, WI) and Pfu (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) DNA polymerases were employed. PCR fragments were then purified using a QIAgen Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and DNA fragments were recovered from the agarose gels using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The Staden software package was used for gene sequence analysis [34]. The GAL genes were amplified using the primers listed in Additional file 6. The restriction sites in the primer sequences enabled the genes to be cloned into JME1128 plasmids that had been digested with BamHI-AvrII, as previously described [35]. Auxotrophies were restored via excision using the Cre-lox recombinase system as described previously [36].

The deletion cassette was typically generated by PCR amplification according to Fickers et al. [36]. First, the promoter (P) and terminator (T) regions were amplified from Y. lipolytica W29 genomic DNA as the template and with the gene-specific P1/P2 and T1/T2 oligonucleotides as primer pairs (Additional file 6). Primers P2 and T1 contained an extension to introduce the I-sceI restriction site.

For the ylGAL10E gene, primer pairs ylGAl10E-P1/ylGAL10E-P2 and ylGAL10E-T1/ylGAL10E-T2 were used (Additional file 6). The P and T regions were purified and used for the second PCR. The resulting PT fragment was ligated into pCR4Blunt-TOPO. The URA3 marker was then introduced at the I-sceI site, yielding the construct ZLE19 containing the ylGAL10E-PUT cassette.

To complement the S. cerevisiae strains GAL genes of which had been deleted, the corresponding genes were cloned in a pRS426 vector using the constitutive TEF promoter and the uracil selection marker. The corresponding ylGAL genes were amplified and digested, as described above, with the restriction enzymes listed in Additional file 6.

Growth media

Media and growth conditions for Escherichia coli were identical to those as described by Sambrook and Russell [33], as were those of Y. lipolytica [28]. Rich (YPD) medium was prepared using 20 g/L Bacto™ Peptone (Difco, Paris, France), 10 g/L yeast extract (Difco), and 20 g/L glucose (Merck, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France). Minimal (YNB) medium was prepared using 1.7 g/L yeast nitrogen base (without amino acids and ammonium sulfate, Difco), 10 g/L glucose (Merck), 5 g/L NH4Cl, and 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). To complement the auxotrophies, 0.1 g/L uracil or leucine (Difco, Paris, France) was added as necessary.

Growth in microtiter plates

Precultures were obtained from frozen stock, inoculated into tubes containing 5 mL YPD medium, and cultured overnight (170 rpm, 28 °C). They were then washed with sterile distilled water; cell suspensions were adjusted to an OD600 of 0.1. Yeast strains were grown in 96-well plates in 200 µL of minimal YNB medium containing 10 g/L of either glucose or galactose. Culturing was repeated three times; 2–3 technical replicates were performed for each condition. Cultures were maintained at 28 °C under constant agitation using a Biotek Synergy MX microtiter plate reader (Biotek Instruments, Colmar, France); each culture’s optical density at 600 nm was measured every 20 min for 72 h.

Growth and media used in the experiments

Initial precultures were established by inoculating 50 mL of YPD medium in 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks with the yeast strains; this was followed by an overnight shaking step at 28 °C and 170 rpm. The cell suspensions were washed three times with sterile distilled water and used to inoculate 50 mL of YNB medium to an OD600 of 0.25. The cultures were grown until all the available sugar had been consumed.

In the galactose utilization experiment, the YNB medium contained one of the following: 1.0 g/L of glucose; 1.0 g/L of galactose; 1.0 g/L of both glucose and galactose; or 10.0 g/L of both glucose and galactose. In addition, galactose utilization was observed in YNB medium containing 10.0 g/L of galactose and either 1.0; 2.0; 4.0; 6.0; 8.0; or 10.0 g/L of glucose.

Analysis of growth on galactose by drop test

To analyze the different strains’ growth on galactose, a drop test was performed on cultures grown on YNB plates. The Y. lipolytica strains were grown in 5 mL of YPD medium for 24 h. The cell suspensions were then washed twice with water and re-suspended at an OD600 of 1. Successive tenfold dilutions were performed (100–10−5), and 5 µl of each dilution were spotted onto YNB plates containing 10.0 g/L of glucose, 1.0 g/L of galactose, or 10.0 g/L of galactose. Pictures were taken after the cultures had been incubated at 28 °C for 48 h. The same protocol was used for the S. cerevisiae strains. However, the YNB media on which they were grown contained the following: 10.0 g/L of either glucose or galactose; 6.5 g/L of YNB; 10.0 g/L of (NH4)2SO4; 0.018 g/L of leucin; 0.0115 g/L of histidin; and 0.025 g/L of lysin.

Analysis of galactose uptake by Yarrowia lipolytica hexose transporters

To analyze galactose uptake, Y. lipolytica hexose transporters were expressed one at a time in the S. cerevisiae hxt null mutant strain EBY.VW4000 (kindly provided by E. Boles, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) using a replicative pRS426 vector containing the TEF promoter [Lazar et al., in preparation]. The cells were grown in 5 mL of YNB medium containing 20 g/L of maltose; the medium was refreshed 3 times per 24-h period to increase 2μ plasmid copy number. The cell suspensions were washed three times with sterile distilled water and used to inoculate 50 mL of YNB medium that contained either 10.0 g/L of glucose or 10.0 g/L of galactose. The culture conditions were as described above ("Growth and media used in the experiments"). OD600 and sugar concentration were analyzed.

Conditions and media used for lipid biosynthesis from galactose in flasks and bioreactors

The precultures were prepared as described above ("Growth and media used in the experiments"). The main culture was grown on 50 mL of YNB medium (C/N 60) containing the following: galactose 60.0 g; YNB 1.7 g; NH4Cl 1.5 g; 0.7 g KH2PO4, and 1.0 g MgSO4 × 7H2O in 1 L. The pH was kept at 6.8 using 0.05 M phosphate buffer. Tap water was used as a source of microelements. To increase the C/N ratio of the medium to 100, 1.25 g/L of NH4Cl was used. Culture conditions were as described above ("Growth and media used in the experiments").

Lipid biosynthesis was also evaluated using batch cultures (BC) that were kept in 5-L stirred-tank BIO-STAT B-PLUS bioreactors (Sartorius, Frankfurt, Germany) for 96 h under the following conditions: 2-L working volume, 28 °C, 800 rpm of agitation, and 3.5-L/min aeration rate. The production medium was prepared as described above. The pH was kept at 6.8 using a 40 % (w/v) NaOH solution. The cultures were grown in 0.2 L of YPD medium in 0.5-L flasks at 170 rpm, at 28 °C for 48 h. The volume of the inocula added to the bioreactor cultures was equal to 10 % of the total working volume.

Analysis of ylGAL gene and hexose transporter expression

For the expression experiments, the wild-type strain (W29) and the quadruple mutant (Y4588) were grown at 28 °C in YNB medium that had been supplemented with 10 g/L glucose. After 16 h, the cell suspensions were washed twice with distilled water and transferred into fresh YNB medium with various sugars. For single sugar experiment, the fresh medium contained either 1.0 or 10.0 g/L of glucose, galactose, or mannose. Samples were harvested at 3 h post inoculation; three replicates were obtained. For the kinetics experiments, the cells were transferred to 1.0 % glucose, 1.0 % galactose or mixture of both 1.0 % glucose and 1.0 % galactose. The samples were harvested at 3, 6, 9 and 24 h post inoculation; three replicates were obtained. All the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and 1.5 μg of each sample was treated with DNase (Ambion, Life Technologies). cDNA was synthesized using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-qPCR (Thermo Scientific). PCR reactions were performed using specific primers that targeted the 3′ end of the genes (Additional file 6). For the semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses, PCR was performed using the GoTaq DNA Polymerase Kit (Promega). For the quantitative RT-PCR analyses, gDNA dilutions were first tested for primer efficiency and then retained if their efficiency rating was higher than 90 %. Amplifications were carried out using the Sso Advanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix Kit (BIO-RAD). The following program was used: 98 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 98 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. Finally, melting curves were generated to confirm amplification specificity. Both ΔC T and ΔΔC T methods were used to calculate relative expression levels; a constitutive gene, actin, was utilized as the reference control [37].

Analytical techniques used in this study

Lipid bodies were stained with BodiPy® Lipid Probe (2.5 mg/mL in ethanol; Invitrogen). Cell suspension samples (OD600 = 5) were incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Images were obtained using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss, Le Pecq, France) equipped with a 100× objective lens and Zeiss filter sets 45 and 46 for fluorescence microscopy. Axiovision 4.8 software (Zeiss, Le Pecq, France) was used for image acquisition.

The fatty acids were converted into methyl esters, analyzed by gas chromatograph (GC) on a Varian Factor Four vf-23 ms column and quantified using C17:0 (Sigma) as internal standard, as described previously [2]. Citric acid, glucose, fructose, and sucrose were identified and quantified by HPLC (UltiMate 3000, Dionex-Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) using an Aminex HPX87H column coupled with UV (210 nm) and RI detectors. The column was eluted with 0.01 N H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min at room temperature. Compounds were identified and quantified via comparisons to standards. Before undergoing HPLC analysis, the samples were filtered on membranes with a pore size of 0.45 μm.

To determine dry biomass, cell pellets from the 15-mL culture samples were washed twice with distilled water, filtered on the above membranes, and dried at 105 °C using a WPS 110S weight dryer (Radwag, Poznań, Poland) until a constant mass was reached.

Abbreviations

Gal: 

galactose

Glu: 

glucose

Man: 

mannose

C T

threshold cycle

OD600

optical density (λ = 600 nm)

X: 

dry biomass

FA: 

fatty acids

CA: 

citric acid

Y X/S

yield of biomass from substrate consumed

Y CA/S

yield of citric acid from substrate consumed

Y CA/X

yield of citric acid from dry biomass

Y FA/S

yield of fatty acids from substrate consumed

Y FA/X

yield of fatty acids from dry biomass

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ZL designed and performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, wrote, and revised the manuscript; HGM designed and performed real-time PCR experiments, discussed and participated in results interpretation, and revised the manuscript; AMCL participated in hexose transporters experiment, helped in results interpretation, and revised the manuscript; CN performed YALI genome analysis, participated in results analysis and interpretation, and revised the manuscript; JMN participated in designing of the experiments, participated in results analysis and interpretation, as well as revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the French National Research Agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Investissements d׳avenir program; reference ANR-11-BTBR-0003) and the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA). Z. Lazar received financial support from the European Union in the form of an AgreenSkills Fellowship (Grant Agreement No. 267196; Marie-Curie FP7 COFUND People Program). We thank Huu-Vang Nguyen for fruitful discussions, Prof. Eckhard Boles for the S. cerevisiae hxt null mutant EBY.VW4000 strain, and Dr. Markus Künzler for the plasmids used to express genes in S. cerevisiae. We would also like to thank Jessica Pearce and Lindsay Higgins for their language editing services.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis
(2)
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis
(3)
Department of Biotechnology and Food Microbiology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences

References

  1. Beopoulos A, Haddouche R, Kabran P, Dulermo T, Chardot T, Nicaud JM. Identification and characterization of DGA2, an acyltransferase of the DGAT1 acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase family in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. New insights into the storage lipid metabolism of oleaginous yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93(4):1523–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lazar Z, Dulermo T, Neuvéglise C, Crutz-Le Coq AM, Nicaud JM. Hexokinase—a limiting factor in lipid production from fructose in Yarrowia lipolytica. Met Eng. 2014;26:89–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mirończuk AM, Furgała J, Rakicka M, Rymowicz W. Enhanced production of erythritol by Yarrowia lipolytica on glycerol in repeated batch cultures. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;41(1):57–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Blazeck J, Hill A, Liu L, Knight R, Miller J, Pan A, Otoupal P, Alper HS. Harnessing Yarrowia lipolytica lipogenesis to create a platform for lipid and biofuel production. Nat Comm. 2014;5:3131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen U, Gruben BS, Madrid S, Mulder H, Nikolaev I, de Vries RP. Unique regulatory mechanism for d-galactose utilization in Aspergillus nidulans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(19):7084–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wong TY, Yao XT. The DeLey-Doudoroff pathway of galactose metabolism in Azotobacter vinelandii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60(6):2065–8.Google Scholar
  7. Mojzita D, Herold S, Metz B, Seiboth B, Richard P. l-Xylo-3-hexulose reductase is the missing link in the oxidoreductive pathway for d-galactose catabolism in filamentous fungi. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(31):26010–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Meyer J, Walker-Jonah A, Hollenberg CP. Galactokinase encoded by GAL1 is a bifunctional protein required for the induction of the GAL genes in Kluyveromyces lactis and is able to suppress the gal3 phenotype of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:5454–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Sellick CA, Campbell RN, Reece RJ. Galactose metabolism in yeast-structure and regulation of the Leloir pathway enzymes and the genes encoding them. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2008;269:111–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Slot JC, Rokas A. Multiple GAL pathway gene clusters evolved independently and by different mechanisms in fungi. PNAS. 2010;107(22):10136–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouffard GG, Rudd KE, Adhya SL. Dependence of lactose metabolism upon mutarotase encoded in the gal operon in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1994;162:156–9.Google Scholar
  12. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR. How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:27–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gancedo JM. Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(2):334–61.Google Scholar
  14. Horak J, Wolf DH. Catabolite inactivation of the galactose transporter in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: ubiquitination, endocytosis, and degradation in the vacuole. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:1541–9.Google Scholar
  15. Cardinali G, Vollenbroich V, Jeon MS, de Graaf AA, Hollenberg CP. Constitutive expression in gal7 mutants of Kluyveromyces lactis is due to the internal production of galactose as an inducer of the Gal/Lac regulon. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(3):1722–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartl L, Kubicek CP, Seiboth B. Induction of the gal pathway and cellulase genes involves no transcriptional inducer function of the galactokinase in Hypocrea jecorina. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(25):18654–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Seiboth B, Hofmann G, Kubicek CP. Lactose metabolism and cellulase production in Hypocrea jecorina: the gal7 gene, encoding galactose-1-phosphate uridylyl-transferase, is essential for growth on galactose but not for cellulase induction. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002;267:124–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Seiboth B, Karaffa L, Sandor E, Kubicek C. The Hypocrea jecorina gal10 (uridine 5′-diphosphate-glucose 4-epimerase) encoding gene differs from yeast homologues in structure, genomic organization and expression. Gene. 2002;295:143–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Seiboth B, Harti L, Pali M, Fekete E, Karaffa L, Kubicek C. The galactokinase of Hypocrea jecorina is essential for cellulase induction by lactose but dispensable for growth on d-galactose. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51(4):1015–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fekete E, de Vries RP, Seiboth B, vanKuyk PA, Sándor E, Fekete E, Metz B, Kubicek CP, Karaffa L. d-Galactose uptake is nonfunctional in the conidiospores of Aspergillus niger. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012;329(2):198–203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Alam K, Kaminskyj GW. Aspergillus galactose metabolism is more complex than that of Saccharomyces: the story of GalDGAL7 and GALEGAL1. Botany. 2013;91:467–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Michely S, Gaillardin C, Nicaud JM, Neuvéglise C. Comparative physiology of oleaginous species from the Yarrowia clade. PLoS one. 2013;8(5):e63356 (1–10).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Suzuki S, Matsuzawa T, Nukigi Y, Takegawa K, Tanaka N. Characterization of two different types of UDP-glucose/-galactose 4-epimerase involved in galactosylation in fission yeast. Microbiology. 2010;156:708–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang ZP, Xu HM, Wang GY, Chi Z, Chi ZM. Disruption of the MIG1 gene enhances lipid biosynthesis in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica ACA-DC 50109. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1831(4):675–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. van den Brink J, Akeroyd M, van der Hoeven R, Pronk JT, De Winde JH, Daran-Lapujade P. Energetic limits to metabolic flexibility: responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to glucose-galactose transition. Microbiology. 2009;155:1340–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Young E, Poucher A, Comer A, Bailey A, Alper H. Functional survey for heterologous sugar transport proteins, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a host. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(10):3311–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Qiao K, Abidi SHI, Liu H, Zhang H, Chakraborty S, Watson N, Ajikumar PK, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering lipid overproduction in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Met Eng. 2015;29:56–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Barth G, Gaillardin C. Yarrowia lipolytica. In: Wolf K, Breunig KD, Barth G, editors. Nonconventional yeasts in biotechnology, vol. 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996. p. 313–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaillardin C, Ribet AM. LEU2 directed expression of β-galactosidase activity and phleomycin resistance in Yarrowia lipolytica. Curr Genet. 1987;11:369–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mumberg D, Müller R, Funk M. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene. 1995;156:119–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Xuan JW, Fournier P, Declerck N, Chasles M, Gaillardin C. Overlapping reading frames at the LYS5 locus in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:4795–806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mauersberger S, Wang HJ, Gaillardin C, Barth G, Nicaud JM. Insertional mutagenesis in the n-alkane-assimilating yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: generation of tagged mutations in genes involved in hydrophobic substrate utilization. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:5102–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  34. Dear S, Staden R. A sequence assembly and editing program for efficient management of large projects. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(14):3907–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Dulermo T, Tréton B, Beopoulos A. Kabran Gnankon AP, Haddouche R, Nicaud JM. Characterization of the two intracellular lipases of Y. lipolytica encoded by TGL3 and TGL4 genes: new insights into the role of intracellular lipases and lipid body organisation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1831(9):1486–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Fickers P, Le Dall MT, Gaillardin C, Thonart P, Nicaud JM. New disruption cassettes for rapid gene disruption and marker rescue in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Microbiol Meth. 2003;55:727–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lazar et al. 2015

Advertisement