Open Access

A multifunctional thermophilic glycoside hydrolase from Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis with potential applications in production of biofuels and biochemicals

Biotechnology for Biofuels20169:98

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0509-y

Received: 5 January 2016

Accepted: 14 April 2016

Published: 30 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Thermophilic enzymes have attracted much attention for their advantages of high reaction velocity, exceptional thermostability, and decreased risk of contamination. Exploring efficient thermophilic glycoside hydrolases will accelerate the industrialization of biofuels and biochemicals.

Results

A multifunctional glycoside hydrolase (GH) CoGH1A, belonging to GH1 family with high activities of β-d-glucosidase, exoglucanase, β-d-xylosidase, β-d-galactosidase, and transgalactosylation, was cloned and expressed from the extremely thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis. The enzyme exerts excellent thermostability by retaining 100 % activity after 12-h incubation at 75 °C. The catalytic coefficients (k cat/K m) of the enzyme against pNP-β-D-galactopyranoside, pNP-β-D-glucopyranoside, pNP-β-D-cellobioside, pNP-β-D-xylopyranoside, and cellobiose were, respectively, 7450.0, 2467.5, 1085.4, 90.9, and 137.3 mM−1 s−1. When CoGH1A was supplemented at the dosage of 20 Ucellobiose g−1 biomass for hydrolysis of the pretreated corn stover, comparing with the control, the glucose and xylose yields were, respectively, increased 37.9 and 42.1 %, indicating that the enzyme contributed not only for glucose but also for xylose release. The efficiencies of lactose decomposition and synthesis of galactooligosaccharides (GalOS) by CoGH1A were investigated at low (40 g L−1) and high (500 g L−1) initial lactose concentrations. At low lactose concentration, the time for decomposition of 83 % lactose was 10 min, which is much shorter than the reported 2–10 h for reaching such a decomposition rate. At high lactose concentration, after 50-min catalysis, the GalOS concentration reached 221 g L−1 with a productivity of 265.2 g L−1 h−1. This productivity is at least 12-fold higher than those reported in literature.

Conclusions

The multifunctional glycoside hydrolase CoGH1A has high capabilities in saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass, decomposition of lactose, and synthesis of galactooligosaccharides. It is a promising enzyme to be used for bioconversion of carbohydrates in industrial scale. In addition, the results of this study indicate that the extremely thermophilic bacteria are potential resources for screening highly efficient glycoside hydrolases for the production of biofuels and biochemicals.

Keywords

β-d-glucosidaseExoglucanaseβ-d-xylosidaseβ-d-galactosidaseTransglycosylationLignocelluloseGalactooligosaccharides Caldicellulosiruptor

Background

Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are enzymes hydrolyzing the glycosidic bond between carbohydrates or between a carbohydrate and a non-carbohydrate moiety [1]. GHs are widely applied in biological and chemical industries. Among them, cellulases (including endoglucanase, exoglucanase, and β-glucosidase) are of great interest for application in biomass degradation for biofuel and biochemical production [2]. In addition, some GHs have the capability of transglycosylation and are used for synthesis of oligosaccharides and glycosides, such as galactooligosaccharides (GalOS) (synthesized by β-galactosidase) [3] and octyl glucoside (synthesized by β-glucosidase) [4]. Production of efficient GHs is urgently required to improve the economical possibility for the related industrial products. Especially, efficient cellulase production has developed into a significant bottleneck for the biofuel industry [1]. Research efforts have recently focused on extremely thermophilic microorganisms for exploring novel cellulases and other GHs to improve the current situation [57], due to the advantages of these thermophilic enzymes, such as higher reaction velocity, excellent thermostability, and decreased risk of contamination [8]. Many thermophilic GHs, such as β-d-glucosidase [9, 10], bifunctional cellulolytic enzyme (endo- and exoglucanases) [11], β-d-xylosidase [12], and β-d-galactosidase [3, 13], have been cloned, heterologously expressed, and biochemically characterized for the purpose of uncovering the catalytic mechanism and evaluating the possibility of industrial applications. Among them, the genus Caldicellulosiruptor has recently attracted high interest for it can produce a diverse set of glycoside hydrolases (GHs) for deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass [7, 14, 15]. The open Caldicellulosiruptor pangenome encoded 106 glycoside hydrolases (GHs) from 43 GH families [7]. Our previous work [16] found that the extremely thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis had comprehensive hemicellulase and cellulase system with potential application for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Moreover, the catalytic mechanism of some enzymes from Caldicellulosiruptor differs from the general GHs. For example, the cellulase CelA produced from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii could hydrolyze the microcrystalline cellulose not only from the surface as common cellulases done but also by excavating extensive cavities into the surface of the substrate [17]. The information about their genetic, biochemical, and biophysical characteristics suggests that there exist more efficient GHs to be explored in the extremely thermophilic microorganisms Caldicellulosiruptor.

In the present work, a multifunctional glycoside hydrolase (GH) was cloned and expressed from C. owensensis. The characteristics of the enzyme and its potential applications in saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass and synthesis of galactooligosaccharides (GalOS) were evaluated.

Results and discussion

Cloning and expression of CoGH1A

The gene Calow_0296 consists of a 1359 bp fragment encoding 452 amino acids, which belongs to glycoside hydrolase family 1 (GH1) and was named CoGH1A. The predicted molecular weight of CoGH1A was 53.2 kDa. The SDS-PAGE analysis agreed with the predicted sizes (Fig. 1b). The quaternary structure of purified CoGH1A was analyzed through gel filtration chromatography coupled with SDS-PAGE. The results are shown in Fig. 1. The molecular mass (MW) of CoGH1A at peak 1 (160.4 kDa) was almost three times that at peak 2 (53.3 kDa) (Fig. 1a). However, fractions collected from two peaks showed the same band in SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1b). This suggests that CoGH1A exists as monomer and homotrimer in buffer. Two thermostable β-glucosidases, one belonging to GH1 from the Termite Nasutitermes takasagoensis [18] and the other belonging to GH3 from Thermoascus aurantiacus [19], were also homotrimers but not monomers in their native form. It is interesting that both monomer and homotrimer of CoGH1A exist in native form. It seems that monomer and homotrimer collectively function on the substrate.
Fig. 1

Gel filtration chromatography and SDS-PAGE analysis of CoGH1A. a Quaternary structure analysis of CoGH1A by gel filtration chromatography. b SDS-PAGE of CoGH1A fractions collected from gel filtration chromatography. The bands marked with Arabic numerals 1–10 corresponded to eluents from a

Optimum temperature, pH and thermostability of CoGH1A

The effects of temperature and pH on the activity of CoGH1A using pNP-β-d-galactopyranoside as the substrate are shown in Fig. 2a, b. It shows that the optimum temperature of CoGH1A was from 75 to 85 °C, which is in accordance with the optimum temperature for C. owensensis growth at 75 °C [20]. At 70 and 90 °C, the activities of CoGH1A were more than 80 % of the maximum, while below 60 °C the enzyme activity decreased to less than 50 % of the maximum. This indicates that CoGH1A is an extremely thermophilic enzyme and has broad temperature adaptability. The optimum pH of CoGH1A was 5.5. At the pH of 5.0 and 6.0, the activities of CoGH1A were about 80 % of the maximum. At the pH of 4.5 and 7.0, the activities of CoGH1A were deceased to about 20 % of the maximum. It is better to control the pH from 5.0 to 6.0 for application of CoGH1A. This is a common pH for most of the glycoside hydrolases.
Fig. 2

Effect of temperature (a) and pH (b) on activity and thermostability (c) of CoGH1A. Values are averages counted from three independent measures; error bars represent standard deviation

The thermostability of CoGH1A is shown in Fig. 2c. After 12 h of incubation in pH 5.5 citrate buffer at 65 and 75 °C, the activities of the enzyme remained the same as that of the initial. These results show that CoGH1A exhibits excellent thermostability at the temperatures below 75 °C. The half-lives of CoGH1A were about 11 and 1.5 h when cultivated at 80 and 85 °C, respectively. The half-lives of the β-glucosidase CbBgl1A from C. bescii [9] at 80 and 85 °C were 20 and 8 min, respectively. The half-lives of the β-galactosidase from C. saccharolyticus [21] at 75 and 80 °C were 17 and 2 h, respectively. This indicates that among the enzymes from Caldicellulosiruptor species CoGH1A is a robust candidate for industrial application.

Effect of ions on the activity of CoGH1A

The effect of cations on the activity of CoGH1A was detected at pH 5.5 and 75 °C (Table 1). On the whole, at the concentrations of both 5 and 10 mM, the effects of cations on the activity of CoGH1A were not significant. Mn2+ and Ni2+ activated the enzyme activity by 135 and 119 %, respectively, at the concentration of 10 mM. K+ activated the enzyme activity by 114 and 105 %, respectively, at the concentrations of 5 and 10 mM. The other cations, such as Fe3+, Zn2+, Co2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Na+, and NH4 +, slightly inhibited the enzyme activity by 71–96 %. These results indicate that CoGH1A has resistance to cations and additional cation is not necessary for activating the enzyme. The effects of cation on CoGH1A were similar to those on some other glycoside hydrolases from Caldicellulosiruptor species, such as the xylanase from C. kronotskyensis [22] and the xylanase and xylosidase from C. owensensis [12]. They were very different from the β-galactosidase produced by Lactobacillus delbrueckii [23]. The K+ and Na+ activated that β-galactosidase with the activities increased almost 5- and 12-fold, respectively, at the ion concentration of 50 mM, while Zn2+ significantly inhibited the activity of that β-galactosidase with the activity decreased to almost zero at the Zn2+ concentration of 10 mM.
Table 1

Effect of cations on the activity of CoGH1A

Cations

Relative activity %

5 mM

10 mM

Control

100

100

Fe3+

92

83

Zn2+

87

82

Ni2+

102

119

Mn2+

104

135

Co2+

95

75

Mg2+

76

80

Cu2+

87

71

K+

114

105

Na+

96

82

NH4 +

82

75

The experiment was carried out at 75 °C and pH 5.5. The pNPGal with the concentration of 1 mM was used as the substrate

Specific activities and kinetic parameters of CoGH1A on different substrates

The activities of CoGH1A on various substrates were tested at 75 °C and pH 5.5. The results (Table 2) show that the enzyme exhibited broad substrate specificity. The highest specific activity was 3215 U mg−1 with pNP-β-d-galactopyranoside (pNPGal) as the substrate, followed by 1621, 603, 280, 140, and 130 U mg−1 with pNP-β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPGlu), pNP-β-d-cellobioside (pNPC), lactose, pNP-β-d-xylopyranoside (pNPX), and cellobiose, respectively, as substrates. Also, the enzyme displayed activities on soluble polysaccharides such as synanthrin (2.4 U mg−1) and locust bean gum (1.2 U mg−1). The enzyme even hydrolyzed insoluble substrates with slight activities on cotton (<0.1 U mg−1) and filter paper (<0.1 U mg−1). However, it exhibited no activity against carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and pNP- α-l-arabinofuranoside (pNPAr).
Table 2

Specific activities of CoGH1A on different substrates

Substrate

Specific activity (U mg−1)

pNPGala

3215 ± 6.2

pNPGlua

1621 ± 15.6

pNPCa

603 ± 11.4

pNPXa

140 ± 5.4

Cellobiosea

130 ± 3.6

Lactosea

280 ± 4.2

Locust bean gumb

2.4 ± 0.2

Synanthrinb

1.2 ± 0.1

Cottonb

<0.1

Filter paperb

<0.1

pNPAra

ND

CMCb

ND

ND not detected

aInitial concentration was 1 mM

bInitial concentration was 1 % (W/V)

The kinetic parameters of CoGH1A were determined on several preferred substrates at 75 °C and pH 5.5 (Table 3). The K m values against pNPGal, pNPGlu, pNPC, pNPX, and cellobiose were 0.61, 1.52, 0.87, 7.18, and 15.65 mM, respectively. The catalytic coefficients (k cat/K m) on the five substrates were, respectively, 7450.0, 2467.5, 1085.4, 90.9, and 137.3 mM−1 s−1.
Table 3

Kinetic parameters of CoGH1A on different substrates

Substrate

K m (mM)

V max (μmol mg−1 min−1)

k cat (s−1)

k cat/K m (mM−1 s−1)

pNPGal

0.61 ± 0.025

5100 ± 64

4522 ± 56.7

7450.0

pNPGlu

1.52 ± 0.2

4027 ± 75

3750.6 ± 66.5

2467.5

pNPC

0.87 ± 0.12

1065 ± 38

944.3 ± 33.7

1085.4

pNPX

7.18 ± 1.4

736 ± 35

652.6 ± 31.0

90.9

Cellobiose

15.65 ± 1.52

2424 ± 48

2149 ± 43

137.3

A complete cellulase system consists of at least three related enzymes: endoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.4), exoglucanases (or cellobiohydrolase) (EC 3.2.1.91), and β-glucosidases (EC 3.2.2.21) [24]. They cooperate in releasing glucose. Endoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.4) randomly hydrolyze internal glycosidic bonds to decrease the length of the cellulose chain and multiply polymer ends. Exoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.91) split-off cellobiose or glucose from cellulose termini and β-glucosidases (EC 3.2.2.21) hydrolyze cellobiose and oligomers to render glucose [24]. Among them, β-glucosidases are essential for efficient hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass as they relieve the inhibition of the cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases by reducing cellobiose accumulation [25]. Commercial cellulase preparations are mainly based on mutant strains of Trichoderma reesei which have usually been characterized by a low secretion of β-glucosidase [26]. Thus, T. reesei cellulase preparations had to be supplemented with added β-glucosidase to provide the more efficient saccharification of cellulosic substrates [26, 27]. Much has been devoted to finding highly efficient β-glucosidases for bioconversion of cellulosic substrates. Some of the β-glucosidases with relatively high activity are listed in Table 4. The V max of CoGH1A was 4027 ± 75 and 2424 ± 48 μmol mg−1 min−1 with pNPGlu and cellobiose, respectively, as substrates, which was lower than that of the β-glucosidase from Pholiota adipose with the V max of 4390 and 3460 μmol mg−1 min−1 using pNPGlu and cellobiose, respectively, as substrates [28]. However, the thermostability of CoGH1A was better than that of the β-glucosidase from Pholiota adipose. The former kept 100 % activity after incubated at 75 °C for 12 h (Fig. 2c) and the latter kept 50 % activity after incubated at 70 °C for 8.5 h [28]. The catalytic coefficient (k cat/K m) of the β-glucosidase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga petroph was 30,800 mM−1 s−1 with pNPGlu as a substrate [10]. To the best of our knowledge, this is by far the highest reported β-glucosidase activity with pNPGlu as a substrate. However, the capability of this β-glucosidase for hydrolysis of cellobiose was very low, with the specific activity of only 2.3 U mg−1 [10]. This will limit its application in saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Another β-glucosidase from the same genus bacterium strain C. bescii was studied in detail [9]. The catalytic coefficients (k cat/K m) of that β-glucosidase were 84.0 and 87.3 mM−1 s−1 with pNPGlu and cellobiose, respectively, as the substrate [9], which were much lower than those (2467.5 and 137.3 mM−1 s−1) of CoGH1A. These results show that CoGH1A is a potential β-glucosidase candidate for industrial application.
Table 4

CoGH1A and some reported microbial β-glucosidases with relatively high activity

Resource

GH family

Substrate

K m (mM)

V max (μmol mg−1 min−1)

k cat (s−1)

k cat/K m (mM−1 s−1)

OT(°C)

OP

References

C. owensensis

GH1

pNPGlu

1.52

4027

3750.6

2467.5

75–85

5.5

This work

Cellobiose

15.65

2424

2149

137.3

C. bescii

GH1

pNPGlu

3.71

311.6

84.0

85

6.8

[9]

Cellobiose

90.8

757.9

8.35

Neosartorya fischeri

GH1

pNPGlu

68

886

826.7

12.2

40

6

[46]

Pholiota adipose

GH3

pNPGlu

2.23

4390

65

5

[28]

Cellobiose

5.60

3460

Fomitopsis pinicola

GH3

pNPGlu

1.8

1710

2990

1700

50

4.5

[47]

Thermotoga petroph

GH1

pNPGlu

2.8

42,700

87,400

30,800

80–90

7–8

[10]

Stereum hirsutum

GH1

pNPGlu

2.5

3028

65

4.5

[48]

Cellobiose

86

172

Talaromyces thermophilus

pNPGlu

0.25

228.7

65

5.0

[49]

Cellobiose

16.7

1519.1

OT optimum temperature; OP optimum pH; no data

Exoglucanases or cellobiohydrolases (CBHs) preferentially hydrolyze β-1, 4-glycosidic bonds from chain ends, producing cellobiose as the main product. CBHs have been shown to create a substrate-binding tunnel with their extended loops which surround the cellulose [29, 30]. Besides microcrystalline cellulose and cotton cellulose, the pNPC was also used as a substrate for detecting the exoglucanases or cellobiohydrolase (CBH) activity [31, 32]. The specific activity and V max of CoGH1A were, respectively, 603 U mg−1 and 1065 μmol mg−1 min−1 using pNPC as the substrate (Tables 2, 3), which were much higher than those for most of the reported enzymes. For example, Le et al. purified a novel cellobiohydrolase from Penicillium decumbens with a specific activity of 1.9 U mg−1 against pNPC [32]. Lee et al. purified a cellobiohydrolase from Penicillium purpurogenum with a specific activity of 10.8 U mg−1 against pNPC U mg−1 [33]. Bok et al. [11] purified two enzymes (CelA and CelB) with both endo- and exoglucanase activities. The V max of CelA and CelB were, respectively, 69.2 and 18.4 μmol mg−1 min−1 with pNPC as a substrate. The high specific activity against pNPC indicates that the CoGH1A has high ability for split-off cellobiose or split-off glucose one by one from pNPC. However, using filter paper or cotton as the substrate the activities were very low (<0.1 U mg−1, Table 2). This is not surprising because the CoGH1A has only catalytic domain (CD) without carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) which would facilitate the enzyme binding to the substrate. Therefore, CoGH1A works primarily on soluble oligosaccharides.

β-galactosidases catalyze the hydrolysis of the β-1, 4-D glycosidic linkage of lactose and structurally related substrates. β-galactosidases have two main technological applications in the food industry, namely the removal of lactose from milk and dairy products [34] and the production of galactooligosaccharides (GalOS) from lactose by transglycosylation [3].

CoGH1A exhibits very high β-galactosidase activity with the catalytic coefficient (k cat/K m) of 7450.0 mM−1 s−1 on pNPGal. This is by far the highest catalytic coefficient for all reported β-galactosidases on pNPGal (Table 5), much higher than the second high catalytic coefficient of 1462.8 mM−1 s−1 by the enzyme from the thermoacidophilic bacterium Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius [35]. The catalytic coefficient of another β-galactosidase from the same genus strain Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus was 149 mM−1 s−1 [21], much lower than that of CoGH1A, although the optimum temperature and pH between them are similar. Table 5 also shows that most of the β-galactosidases with higher activity belong to GH1. The optimum pH and temperature of these GH1 β-galactosidases are, respectively, 5.5–6.5 and 65–85 °C. In general, the higher temperatures can be beneficial in higher oligosaccharide yields. The problem of microbial contamination can also be solved by increasing the catalysis temperature [34]. CoGH1A with high β-galactosidase activity and high optimum temperature (75–85 °C) will be a promising enzyme in the food industry.
Table 5

Kinetic parameters of CoGH1A and some reported microbial β-galactosidases with relatively high activity

Resource

GH family

Substrate

K m (mM)

V max (μmol mg−1 min−1)

k cat (s−1)

k cat/K m (mM−1 s−1)

OT (°C)

OP

Reference

C. owensensis

GH1

pNPGal

0.607

5100

4522

7450

75–85

5.5

This work

Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius

GH1

oNPGal

5.50

8045.5

1462.8

65

5.5

[35]

Hot spring metagenome

GH1

pNPGal

3.33

40.00

2000.0

600.6

65

8.0

[50]

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus

GH2

oNPGal

0.919

317

603

655

45–60

7.5

[23]

Lactose

19.2

123

234

12.3

Bifidobacterium breve

GH2

oNPGal

1.3

486

937

722

50

7.0

[51]

Marine metagenomic library

GH2

Lactose

17.98

131.16

7.29

50

7.0

[52]

Bacillus licheniformis

GH42

oNPGal

13.7

299

785

57.3

50

6.5

[53]

C. saccharolyticus

GH42

oNPGal

1.21

149

123

80

6.0

[21]

Lactose

30.0

42

1.4

Thermotoga naphthophila

GH42

oNPGal

1.31

3385.67

90

6.8

[13]

Lactose

1.43

2.67

70

5.8

Thermotoga maritima

GH42

pNPGal

2.74

351

5.85

2.13

80

5.5

[54]

OT optimum temperature; OP optimum pH; no data

Supplementation of CoGH1A for lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis

Based on the fact that CoGH1A is a multifunctional glycoside hydrolase, especially with high β-glucosidase activity, its capacity on saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass was determined. The experiment for hydrolysis of the steam-exploded (SE) corn stover by the commercial enzyme CTec2 (Novozymes) supplemented with CoGH1A was carried out at 60 °C and pH 5.5. As shown in Fig. 3, supplementation of CoGH1A could markedly enhance saccharification of the steam-exploded (SE) corn stover. Supplementing CoGH1A with the dose of 10 and 20 Ucellobiose g−1 biomass, after 72-h hydrolysis, the concentrations of glucose increased from 1.95 (hydrolyzed by CTec2 only) to 2.53 and 2.69 g L−1, increasing 29.7 and 37.9 %, respectively. In addition, the concentrations of xylose also increased from 0.38 to 0.47 and 0.54 g L−1, increasing 23.7 and 42.1 %, respectively. This indicates that CoGH1A contributed not only for cellulose but also for hemicellulose hydrolysis, due to its multi-activities on glycoside hydrolysis (Table 2 and 3). Although the catalytic temperature 60 °C in this experiment was not optimum for both CTec2 (50 °C) and CoGH1A (75–85 °C), especially, the activity of CoGH1A at 60 °C was only about 50 % of the maximum (Fig. 2), this experiment demonstrated the high ability of CoGH1A on saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. CoGH1A, possessing β-glucosidase, exoglucanase, and β-xylosidase activities, may be a promising enzyme for industrial application in bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass.
Fig. 3

Synergetic hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by CTec2 and CoGH1A. This experiment was carried out in pH 5.5 acetate buffer at 60 °C with the initial biomass of 20 g L−1. The CTec2 loading rate was 10 FPU g−1 biomass. The loading rate of the supplemented CoGH1A was 10 or 20 Ucellobiose g−1 biomass. Values are averages counted from three independent measures; error bars represent standard deviation

Lactose transformation and synthesis of galactooligosaccharides

Since CoGH1A has very high β-galactosidase activity, its potential industrial applications were further investigated in low (40 g L−1) and high (500 g L−1) initial lactose concentrations by cultivating in pH 5.5 citrate buffer at 70 °C with the enzyme dosage of 2.5 Ulactose mL−1. Figure 4a shows the time course of the enzymatic catalysis at the initial lactose concentration of 40 g L−1 which is very close to the concentration of lactose in fresh milk. After 10-min reaction, more than 83 % of the lactose was degraded and the yields of GalOS, glucose, and galactose were 17.0, 35.6, and 30.6 % with the concentrations of 6.80, 14.24, and 12.24 g L−1, respectively. When the reaction continued to 30 min, about 92 % of the lactose was converted and the yields of GalOS, glucose, and galactose were 11.0, 41.9, and 39.0 % with the concentrations of 4.40, 16.46, and 15.6 g L−1, respectively. Further prolonging the reaction time, the concentrations of lactose and GalOS were gradually decreased, while the concentrations of glucose and galactose were gradually increased.
Fig. 4

Time course of the enzymatic catalysis of lactose degradation and GalOS synthesis by CoGH1A at the initial lactose concentration of 40 g L−1 (a) and 500 g L−1 (b). Values are averages counted from three independent measures; error bars represent standard deviation

In literature, when the lactose hydrolysis rates reached 70–95 %, the reaction time needed is 2–10 h [34, 3638]. However, in this research only 10 min was needed by CoGH1A. The high efficiency of CoGH1A makes it a potential candidate in milk and milk product industries. Moreover, CoGH1A has a function in the synthesis of GalOS, with 10–20 % GalOS yield during lactose hydrolysis. This will upgrade the quality and value of milk and milk products since GalOS are non-digestible oligosaccharides and are used as prebiotic food ingredients.

When the initial lactose concentration was 500 g L−1 (Fig. 4b), the GalOS yield was much higher than that with low initial lactose concentration (40 g L−1 Fig. 4a). This is in agreement with the fact that higher initial lactose concentrations can be beneficial in higher oligosaccharide yields [34]. The GalOS yield was 38.6 % after 30-min catalysis and gradually increased to 44.2 % at 50 min. Further catalyzing for 70 min, the GalOS yield was slightly decreased to 39.2 %. This indicated that reaction for 50 min is enough for achieving the highest GalOS yield. The highest GalOS concentration reached 221 g L−1 with a productivity of 265.2 g L−1 h−1.

Figure 4 also shows that at low initial lactose concentration (Fig. 4a) the glucose and galactose were the main products (totally about 80 %) and the yield of glucose was almost the same as that of galactose. This indicates that the velocity of lactose decomposition was much higher than that of GalOS synthesis in the condition of low initial lactose concentration. During the catalytic process at high initial lactose concentration (Fig. 4b), the concentration of lactose was quickly decreased. It was decreased more than 80 % after 50 min; however, the yield of galactose, which was produced from lactose decomposition, was kept below 11.6 % because galactose was used for GalOS synthesis. It shows that the velocity of lactose decomposition was almost same as that of GalOS synthesis in the condition of high initial lactose concentration.

The characteristics of GalOS synthesis by CoGH1A at the initial lactose concentration of 500 g L−1 and some other β-galactosidases in batch process are shown in Table 6. The GalOS productivity by CoGH1A was more than 12 times higher than that of the β-galactosidases from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus (19.8 g L−1 h−1) [23], Bifidobacterium breve (14.7 g L−1 h−1) [51], marine metagenomic library (20.6 g L−1 h−1) [52], and Thermotoga maritima (18.20 g L−1 h−1) [39]. Time for reaching the maximum yield by the four β-galactosidases was 5–10 h (Table 6), which is at least fivefold longer than that by CoGH1A. Although the enzyme loading rate of CoGH1A (2.5 Ulactose mL−1) in this study was higher than that from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (1.5 Ulactose mL−1) and Thermotoga maritima (1.5 Ulactose mL−1), the actual protein loading rate of CoGH1A was 8.9 μg mL−1 which was much lower than those of other β-galactosidases (Table 6). Moreover, CoGH1A has high thermostability with retaining 100 % activity after incubation at 75 °C for 12 h (Fig. 2c). The problem of microbial contamination can also be alleviated or avoided at such a high temperature. These advantages of CoGH1A make it a potential candidate for GalOS synthesis.
Table 6

Characteristic of GalOS synthesis by different β-galactosidases in batch process

Enzyme source

Initial lactose concentration (g L−1)

Enzyme loading (Ulactose ml−1 μg ml−1)

Temperature (°C)

Time for reaching maximum yield

GalOS productivity (g L−1 h−1)

Maximum yield of GalOS %

References

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus

205

1.5

>12.2a

50

5 h

19.8

~50

[23]

Bifidobacterium breve

200

2.5

>25.8a

30

6 h

14.7

44

[51]

Thermotoga maritima

500

1.5

>23.6a

80

5 h

18.2

18

[39, 55]

Marine metagenomic library

360

18

267.9

40

~10 h

20.6

57.1

[52]

Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis

500

2.5

8.9

70

50 min

265.2

44.2

This work

aThe given data were calculated using the values of the V max of each enzyme as the specific activity

Multiple sequence alignment and the possible role in host bacterium

The structure and active site residues of the enzyme were predicted for analyzing the difference between CoGH1A and other GHs whose structures were resolved. Three proteins with relatively higher identity to CoGH1A were found, i.e., 3AHX (a β-glucosidase from Clostridium cellulovorans) [40], 4PTV (a β-glucosidase from Halothermothrix orenii) [41], and 1OD0 (a β-glucosidase from Thermotoga maritima) [42]. CoGH1A shares, respectively, 53, 50, and 48 % identity with them. However, the catalytic coefficients (k cat/K m) of 3AHX, 4PTV, and 1OD0 were, respectively, 340, 187, and 102 mM−1 s−1 with pNPGlu (for 3AHX and 4PTV) [40, 41] or 2, 4-dinitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (for 1OD0) [42] as a substrate. They are much lower than those of CoGH1A. Multiple sequence alignment of CoGH1A with the aforesaid proteins (Fig. 5) was performed using the ClustalX2 software and depicted online by ESPrit 3.0 (http://www.espript.ibcp.fr/). The catalytic acid/base and catalytic nucleophile of CoGH1A are predicted as Glu163 and Glu361 (pointed out by blue arrows in Fig. 5), respectively. The residual Glu414 is predicted to be participated in substrate binding. As Fig. 5 shows, both the catalytic glutamic acid residues and the amino acid residues next to them are conserved among the four enzymes. This suggests that the catalytic coefficients of these enzymes are determined by the amino acid sequences except the conserved catalytic glutamic acids.
Fig. 5

Multiple sequence alignment of Calow_296 and the three resolved proteins with relatively higher identity. The blue arrows indicate the conserved catalytic glutamic acid residues

Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis, the host bacterium of CoGH1A, was isolated from a shallow freshwater pond located in the Owens Lake bed area [20]. It could grow on a wide variety of carbon sources including arabinose, glucose, cellobiose, cellulose, xylan, xylose, galactose, dextrin, fructose, lactose, glycogen, inositol, mannitol, mannose, maltose, pectin, raffinose, rhamnose, ribose, starch, sucrose, and tagatose [20]. In its growing environment, the polysaccharides (or glycans) may be the most possible carbon sources that C. owensensis could be obtained. Decomposition of these polysaccharides to monoses is necessary for C. owensensis to assimilate them. The multifunctional glycoside hydrolase CoGH1A, which could efficiently convert various soluble oligosaccharides to monoses, may give important contribution to C. owensensis for its capability of utilizing the wide variety of carbon sources. The thermostability of CoGH1A and its resistance to cations may also help the host bacterium growing in the changeful environments.

Conclusions

A multifunctional glycoside hydrolase, named CoGH1A, has been cloned and expressed from the extremely thermophilic bacterium C. owensensis. It possesses high activities of β-d-glucosidase, exoglucanase, β-d-xylosidase, β-d-galactosidase, and transgalactosylation. Moreover, it exerts excellent thermostability by retaining 100 % activity after 12-h incubation at 75 °C. The enzyme contributed not only for glucose but also for xylose release when it was supplemented for hydrolysis of corn stover. Additionally, the catalytic efficiencies of this enzyme on lactose decomposition and galactooligosaccharides synthesis were at least, respectively, 5- and 12-fold those of the reported glycoside hydrolases. The multifunctional glycoside hydrolase CoGH1A is a promising enzyme to be used for bioconversion of biomass and carbohydrate. This research also indicates that the extremely thermophilic bacteria are potential resources for screening highly efficient GHs for the production of biofuels and biochemicals.

Methods

Materials

The extremely thermophilic cellulolytic bacteria C. owensensis DSM 13,100 was purchased from the DSMZ (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures). The substrates, p-nitrophenyl β-d-galactopyranoside (pNPGal), p-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPGlu), p-nitrophenyl β-d-cellobioside (pNPC), p-nitrophenyl β-d-xylopyranoside (pNPX), p-nitrophenyl β-d-mannopyranoside (pNPM), p-nitrophenyl α-l-arabinofuranoside (pNPAr), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), locust bean gum, and synanthrin, were purchased from Sigma. The chemicals and other substrates were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Co., Ltd or Sigma. The steam-exploded corn straw was obtained by being pretreated in the condition of 1.5 MPa retained for 3 min. Its composition was glucan 46.8 %, xylan 4.3 %, araban 0 %, and lignin 27.4 %. Competent cells used for cloning and expression were Escherichia coli Top10 (TianGen, China) and E. coli BL21 (DE3), respectively. The E.coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells were prepared with the methods described in Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual [43].

Cloning the gene of CoGH1A

Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis cells were inoculated at 75 °C, 75 rpm for 24 h with the DSMZ medium 640 (detailed list of ingredient was supplied by DSMZ, http://www.dsmz.de). The genomic DNA of C. owensensis was extracted from 3 mL of fermentation broth using TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (TianGen, China). Gene Calow_0296 was amplified from the genomic DNA of C. owensensis using the primers of CoGH1A—F 5′-GCCGCGCGGCAGCATGAGTTTTCCAAAAG-3′ and CoGH1A—R 5′-GCG GCCGCAAGCGTTTATGAATTT TCCTTTAT-3′. The PCR product was then purified and separately treated with 0.5 IU of T4 DNA polymerase (Takara) and 5 mM dATP at 37 °C for 30 min. T4 DNA polymerase was then inactivated by incubating at 75 °C for 20 min, and vector pETke and the treated insert gene were annealed at 22 °C for 15 min. After that, recombinant plasmids were transferred into TOP10 competent cells, and then cultured by Lysogeny Broth (LB) agar plates with kanamycin (50 μg mL−1). After colony PCR and sequencing validation (Sangon, Shanghai, China), target fragments were proved to have imported into the vectors. Then positive recombinant plasmid was extracted by TIAN prep Mini Plasmid Kit (TianGen) and transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3).

Heterologous expression and purification of CoGH1A

The transformed cells were incubated overnight on LB agar plate with kanamycin at 37 °C. Single colony was picked from the plate and cultivated in liquid LB medium with kanamycin in an incubator shaker (220 rpm, 37 °C) for 12 h. The recombinant bacteria were inoculated into fresh liquid LB medium (1 L) with kanamycin and incubated in the incubator shaker (220 rpm, 37 °C) till OD600 of about 0.6–0.8. Then the isopropyl-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) with a final concentration of 0.1 mM was added to the broth for further 12-h cultivation at the conditions of 16 °C and 160 rpm. Cells were collected and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl), and then lysed at 4 °C by Selecta Sonopuls (JY92-IN, Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology, Ningbo, China). After centrifugation (20,000 rpm for 20 min), the supernatant was applied to a His-Tag Ni-affinity resin (National Engineering Research Centre for Biotechnology, Beijing, China) pre-equilibrated with binding buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl). The column was washed with 10 mL binding buffer to remove the nonassociative proteins. Fusion protein (CoGH1A) was eluted by elution buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl and 150 mM imidazole). The purified CoGH1A was confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The protein concentration was measured as described by Bradford [44] using bovine serum albumin as standard. The quaternary structure of purified CoGH1A was analyzed through gel filtration chromatography. The molecular mass (MW) was estimated by the calibration curve of log (MW) vs. elution volume.

Assay activities of CoGH1A on different substrates

Substrate specificity of the CoGH1A was estimated by incubating the diluted enzyme in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 1 mM p-nitrophenol-glycosides (pNPGal, pNPGlu, pNPC, pNPX, pNPAr, or pNPM) or disaccharides (cellobiose or lactose) or 1 % (w/v) glycan (locust bean gum, synanthrin, cotton, filter paper, or carboxymethyl cellulose) at 75 °C for 5–30 min. The released p-nitrophenol (from p-nitrophenol-glycosides), glucose (from cellobiose and lactose), and reducing sugars (from glycans) were, respectively, measured by spectrophotometer (at 400 nm) [16], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and DNS method [45]. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of protein capable of releasing 1 μmol pNP, glucose, or reducing sugars from the substrates (releasing 2 μmol glucose from cellobiose) per minute.

Characterization of CoGH1A

The optimum pH for CoGH1A was determined in the range of 4–8 at the temperature of 75 °C in citrate buffer. The optimum temperature for CoGH1A was determined in the range of 40–100 °C at the pH 5.5 in citrate buffer. Thermostability was investigated after incubation of the samples at different temperatures in pH 5.5 citrate buffer. Samples were withdrawn at appropriate time intervals and the residual activity was measured as described above. The effects of metal ions on CoGH1A activity were determined at 75 °C and pH 5.5. The pNPGal with the concentration of 1 mM was used as a substrate. The kinetic parameters on the substrates of pNPGal, pNPGlu, pNPC, pNPX, and cellobiose were analyzed at 75 °C and pH 5.5 using various concentrations of each substrate for enzyme activity assay.

Hydrolysis of the steam-exploded corn stover

Synergetic hydrolysis by the commercial enzyme cocktail Cellic CTec2 (Novozymes) and CoGH1A was carried out in pH 5.5 acetate buffer with the initial steam-exploded corn stover concentration of 20 g L−1. The reaction volume was 1 mL in a 2-mL Eppendorf tube, which was sealed by winding parafilm after closing the lip, and put in a water bath at 60 °C for 72 h. The loading rates of CTec2 and CoGH1A were, respectively, 10 FPU g−1 biomass and 10 or 20 Ucellobiose g−1 biomass. Hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover using CTec2 alone in the same condition was implemented as a control. The produced sugars were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a pump of LC-20AT (Shimadzu, Japan) and a refractive index detector (RID-10A, Shimadzu, Japan). A Hi-Plex Ca column (7.7 × 300 mm, Agilent Technology, USA) was used for the HPLC analysis. HPLC-grade water was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 at 85 °C.

Lactose hydrolysis and transgalactosylation

Lactose hydrolysis and transgalactosylation by CoGH1A were carried out, respectively, at the initial lactose concentrations of 40 and 500 g L−1, in citrate buffer of pH 5.5 at 70 °C with the β-galactosidase dosage of 2.5 Ulactose mL−1. Quantitative analysis of the sugars was carried out by HPLC. Glucose, galactose, and lactose in the mixtures were identified by comparison of their retention times with those of the standards and quantified from the peak area calibrated against sugar standards. In this HPLC experiment, the disaccharides such as lactose, galactobiose, and allolactose could not be separated. The retention time of these disaccharides was almost the same. Therefore, the total disaccharides were quantified using the lactose as standard. The GalOS yield was calculated according to the following formula:
$$GalOS\,\text{yield}\,{(\% ) = }\,\frac{{\text{mass}\,\text{of}\,\text{initial}\,\text{lactose} - {\text{mass}}\,{\text{of}}\, ( {\text{disaccharides}}\,{ + }\,{\text{glucose}}\,{ + }\,{\text{galactose)}}}}{{{\text{mass}}\,{\text{of}}\,{\text{initial}}\,{\text{lactose}}}} \times 100\,\%.$$

This formula is based on the fact that the sum of all sugars (glucose, galactose, disaccharides, and GalOS) was approximately equal to that of initial lactose [52]. According to this formula, the GalOS yields given in this work do not include the disaccharides.

Structure and active site prediction

The structure and active site were predicted for analyzing the difference between CoGH1A and other GHs whose structures were resolved. The amino acid sequence of CoGH1A was blasted in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database (http://www.rcsb.org).

Multiple sequence alignment of CoGH1A with the resolved proteins was performed using the ClustalX2 software and depicted online by ESPrit 3.0 (http://www.espript.ibcp.fr/).

Abbreviations

GH: 

glycoside hydrolase

FPA: 

filter paper activity

CMC: 

carboxymethylcellulose

pNPGal: 

p-nitrophenyl β-d-galactopyranoside

pNPGlu: 

p-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside

pNPC: 

p-nitrophenyl β-d-cellobioside

pNPX: 

p-nitrophenyl β-d-xylopyranoside

pNPM: 

p-nitrophenyl β-d-mannopyranoside

pNPAr: 

p-nitrophenyl α-l-arabinofuranoside

HPLC: 

high-performance liquid chromatography

GalOS: 

galactooligosaccharides

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

XP and YH designed the study. XP performed all the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. HS participated in structure analysis. SM participated in DNA extraction. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the financial support from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Project No: 2014AA021905) and 100 Talents Program of Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Garvey M, Klose H, Fischer R, et al. Cellulases for biomass degradation: comparing recombinant cellulase expression platforms. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:581–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Reyes-Ortiz V, Heins RA, Cheng G, et al. Addition of a carbohydrate-binding module enhances cellulase penetration into cellulose substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Park AR, Oh DK. Galacto-oligosaccharide production using microbial β-galactosidase: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:1279–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Zou ZZ, Yu HL, Li CX, et al. A new thermostable β-glucosidase mined from Dictyoglomus thermophilum: properties and performance in octyl glucoside synthesis at high temperatures. Bioresour Technol. 2012;118:425–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer MW, Driskill LE, Kelly RM. Glycosyl hydrolases from hyperthermophilic microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1998;9:141–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumer-Schuette SE, Kataeva I, Westpheling J, et al. Extremely thermophilic microorganisms for biomass conversion: status and prospects. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:210–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumer-Schuette SE, Giannone RJ, Zurawski JV, et al. Caldicellulosiruptor core and pangenomes reveal determinants for noncellulosomal thermophilic deconstruction of plant biomass. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:4015–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhalla A, Bansal N, Kumar S, et al. Improved lignocellulose conversion to biofuels with thermophilic bacteria and thermostable enzymes. Bioresour Technol. 2013;128:751–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bai A, Zhao X, Jin Y, et al. A novel thermophilic β-glucosidase from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii: characterization and its synergistic catalysis with other cellulases. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2013;85:248–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Haq IU, Khan MA, Muneer B, et al. Cloning, characterization and molecular docking of a highly thermostable β-1, 4-glucosidase from Thermotoga petrophila. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34:1703–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bok JD, Yernool DA, Eveleigh DE. Purification, characterization, and molecular analysis of thermostable cellulases CelA and CelB from Thermotoga neapolitana. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:4774–81.Google Scholar
  12. Mi S, Jia X, Wang J, et al. Biochemical characterization of two thermostable xylanolytic enzymes encoded by a gene cluster of Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106482.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kong F, Wang Y, Cao S, et al. Cloning, purification and characterization of a thermostable β-galactosidase from Thermotoga naphthophila RUK-10. Process Biochem. 2014;49:775–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Blumer-Schuette SE, Lewis DL, Kelly RM. Phylogenetic, microbiological, and glycoside hydrolase diversities within the extremely thermophilic, plant biomass-degrading genus Caldicellulosiruptor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:8084–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Blumer-Schuette SE, Ozdemir I, Mistry D, et al. Complete genome sequences for the anaerobic, extremely thermophilic plant biomass-degrading bacteria Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis, Caldicellulosiruptor kristjanssonii, Caldicellulosiruptor kronotskyensis, Caldicellulosiruptor owensenis and Caldicellulosiruptor lactoaceticus. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:1483–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Peng X, Qiao W, Mi S, et al. Characterization of hemicellulase and cellulase from the extremely thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis and their potential application for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass without pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Brunecky R, Alahuhta M, Xu Q, et al. Revealing nature’s cellulase diversity: the digestion mechanism of Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA. Science. 2013;342:1513–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Uchima C, Tokuda G, Watanabe H, Kitamoto K, Arioka M. Heterologous expression in Pichia pastoris and characterization of an endogenous thermostable and high-glucose-tolerant β-glucosidase from the termite Nasutitermes takasagoensis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(12):4288–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Parry N, Beever D, Owen E, Vandenberghe I, Beeumen J, Bhat M. Biochemical characterization and mechanism of action of a thermostable β-glucosidase purified from Thermoascus aurantiacus. Biochem J. 2001;353:117–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang C-Y, Patel BK, Mah RA, Baresi L. Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis sp. nov., an anaerobic, extremely thermophilic, xylanolytic bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998;48:91–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Park AR, Oh DK. Effects of galactose and glucose on the hydrolysis reaction of a thermostable β-galactosidase from Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:1427–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Qiao W, Tang S, Mi S, Jia X, Peng X, Han Y. Biochemical characterization of a novel thermostable GH11 xylanase with CBM6 domain from Caldicellulosiruptor kronotskyensis. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2014;107:8–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen TT, Nguyen HA, Arreola SL, et al. Homodimeric β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus DSM 20081: expression in Lactobacillus plantarum and biochemical characterization. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:1713–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2006;24:452–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Bhatia Y, Mishra S, Bisaria V. Microbial β-glucosidases: cloning, properties, and applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2002;22:375–407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Merino ST, Cherry J. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;108:95–120.Google Scholar
  27. Gusakov AV. Alternatives to Trichoderma reesei in biofuel production. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29:419–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Jagtap SS, Dhiman SS, Kim TS, et al. Characterization of a β-1, 4-glucosidase from a newly isolated strain of Pholiota adiposa and its application to the hydrolysis of biomass. Biomass Bioenerg. 2013;54:181–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Divne C, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T, et al. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Science. 1994;265:524–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, et al. Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Science. 1990;249:380–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Segato F, Damasio A, Gonçalves TA, et al. Two structurally discrete GH7-cellobiohydrolases compete for the same cellulosic substrate fiber. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gao L, Wang F, Gao F, et al. Purification and characterization of a novel cellobiohydrolase (PdCel6A) from Penicillium decumbens JU-A10 for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:8339–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee KM, Joo AR, Jeya M, et al. Production and characterization of cellobiohydrolase from a novel strain of Penicillium purpurogenum KJS506. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;163:25–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Panesar PS, Kumari S, Panesar R. Potential applications of immobilized β-galactosidase in food processing industries. Enzyme Res. 2010;2010:473137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Di Lauro B, Rossi M, Moracci M. Characterization of a β-glycosidase from the thermoacidophilic bacterium Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius. Extremophiles. 2006;10:301–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Li X, Zhou QZ, Chen XD. Pilot-scale lactose hydrolysis using β-galactosidase immobilized on cotton fabric. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2007;46:497–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Roy I, Gupta MN. Lactose hydrolysis by Lactozym™ immobilized on cellulose beads in batch and fluidized bed modes. Process Biochem. 2003;39:325–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Haider T, Husain Q. Immobilization of β-galactosidase by bioaffinity adsorption on concanavalin A layered calcium alginate–starch hybrid beads for the hydrolysis of lactose from whey/milk. Int Dairy J. 2009;19:172–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ji ES, Park NH, Oh DK. Galacto-oligosaccharide production by a thermostable recombinant β-galactosidase from Thermotoga maritima. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;21:759–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Jeng WY, Wang NC, Lin MH, et al. Structural and functional analysis of three β-glucosidases from bacterium Clostridium cellulovorans, fungus Trichoderma reesei and termite Neotermes koshunensis. J Struct Biol. 2011;173:46–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hassan N, Nguyen T-H, Intanon M, et al. Biochemical and structural characterization of a thermostable β-glucosidase from Halothermothrix orenii for galacto-oligosaccharide synthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:1731–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Zechel DL, Boraston AB, Gloster T, et al. Iminosugar glycosidase inhibitors: structural and thermodynamic dissection of the binding of isofagomine and 1-deoxynojirimycin to β-glucosidases. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:14313–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Green MR, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  44. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Tiwari MK, Lee KM, Kalyani D, et al. Role of Glu445 in the substrate binding of β-glucosidase. Process Biochem. 2012;47:2365–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Joo AR, Jeya M, Lee KM, et al. Purification and characterization of a β-1, 4-glucosidase from a newly isolated strain of Fomitopsis pinicola. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;83:285–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee KM, Lee KM, Kim IW, et al. One-step purification and characterization of a β-1, 4-glucosidase from a newly isolated strain of Stereum hirsutum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:2107–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Mallek-Fakhfakh H, Belghith H. Physicochemical properties of thermotolerant extracellular β-glucosidase from Talaromyces thermophilus and enzymatic synthesis of cello-oligosaccharides. Carbohydr Res. 2016;419:41–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Gupta R, Govil T, Capalash N, Sharma P. Characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 1 β-galactosidase from hot spring metagenome with transglycosylation activity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;168:1681–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Arreola SL, Intanon M, Suljic J, et al. Two β-galactosidases from the human isolate Bifidobacterium breve DSM 20213: molecular cloning and expression, biochemical characterization and synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Li L, Li G, Cao L, et al. Characterization of the cross-linked enzyme aggregates of a novel β-galactosidase, a potential catalyst for the synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:894–901.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Juajun O, Nguyen TH, Maischberger T, et al. Cloning, purification, and characterization of β-galactosidase from Bacillus licheniformis DSM 13. App Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:645–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Li L, Zhang M, Jiang Z, et al. Characterisation of a thermostable family 42 β-galactosidase from Thermotoga maritima. Food Chem. 2009;112:844–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim C, Ji ES, Oh DK. Characterization of a thermostable recombinant β-galactosidase from Thermotoga maritima. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:1006–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Peng et al. 2016

Advertisement