Skip to content


Biotechnology for Biofuels

Open Access

Genome and methylome of the oleaginous diatom Cyclotella cryptica reveal genetic flexibility toward a high lipid phenotype

  • Jesse C. Traller1,
  • Shawn J. Cokus2,
  • David A. Lopez2,
  • Olga Gaidarenko1,
  • Sarah R. Smith1, 3,
  • John P. McCrow3,
  • Sean D. Gallaher2, 4,
  • Sheila Podell1,
  • Michael Thompson2,
  • Orna Cook1,
  • Marco Morselli2,
  • Artur Jaroszewicz2,
  • Eric E. Allen1,
  • Andrew E. Allen1, 3,
  • Sabeeha S. Merchant4,
  • Matteo Pellegrini2 and
  • Mark Hildebrand1Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels20169:258

Received: 8 July 2016

Accepted: 15 November 2016

Published: 25 November 2016



Improvement in the performance of eukaryotic microalgae for biofuel and bioproduct production is largely dependent on characterization of metabolic mechanisms within the cell. The marine diatom Cyclotella cryptica, which was originally identified in the Aquatic Species Program, is a promising strain of microalgae for large-scale production of biofuel and bioproducts, such as omega-3 fatty acids.


We sequenced the nuclear genome and methylome of this oleaginous diatom to identify the genetic traits that enable substantial accumulation of triacylglycerol. The genome is comprised of highly methylated repetitive sequence, which does not significantly change under silicon starved lipid induction, and data further suggests the primary role of DNA methylation is to suppress DNA transposition. Annotation of pivotal glycolytic, lipid metabolism, and carbohydrate degradation processes reveal an expanded enzyme repertoire in C. cryptica that would allow for an increased metabolic capacity toward triacylglycerol production. Identification of previously unidentified genes, including those involved in carbon transport and chitin metabolism, provide potential targets for genetic manipulation of carbon flux to further increase its lipid phenotype. New genetic tools were developed, bringing this organism on a par with other microalgae in terms of genetic manipulation and characterization approaches.


Functional annotation and detailed cross-species comparison of key carbon rich processes in C. cryptica highlights the importance of enzymatic subcellular compartmentation for regulation of carbon flux, which is often overlooked in photosynthetic microeukaryotes. The availability of the genome sequence, as well as advanced genetic manipulation tools enable further development of this organism for deployment in large-scale production systems.


DiatomGenome sequence Cyclotella cryptica Algae biofuelCarbon metabolismDNA methylation


Global environmental changes are happening at an increasingly rapid rate, and development of technologies to alleviate negative outcomes is urgently needed. One proposed solution is producing energy from biofuel, which is renewable and has fewer detrimental effects than the use of fossil fuels. A potential feedstock for biofuel production, microalgae, has garnered interest because of its high productivity. The overall requirement for land to grow algae to sustain the United States’ fuel supply is predicted to be relatively small (<4% of the total land mass) compared to other crops [1].

Developing technologies have increased the promise of algal biofuel to meet energy needs [2, 3]. These new advances were preceded by the US Department of Energy funded Aquatic Species Program (ASP) which produced pioneering work in aquaculture and large-scale production of biodiesel from microalgae [4]. During the ASP, algal species across the tree of life were assessed for their ability to accumulate abundant triacylglycerol (a precursor to biofuel), to grow under variable environmental conditions such as pH, salinity and temperature, and to grow at a productive and sustainable rate in outdoor raceway ponds [4]. Several genera stood out from the rest, including chlorophytes, chrysophytes, and diatoms. Diatoms (Bacillariophyta), which are naturally highly productive, accounted for ~60% of the top-performing species in a recommended list of biofuel production organisms produced by the ASP [4].

Cyclotella cryptica (Fig. 1), a brackish water diatom isolated from Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, was identified in the ASP as a top species for large-scale biofuel production. Cyclotella cryptica has been shown to be an excellent accumulator of lipid ([5, 6]; Fig. 1), is euryhaline, enabling flexibility in cultivation conditions [57], and can grow outdoors at levels between 20.0 and 29.7 g Ash Free Dry Weight (AFDW) m2/day in a 2.8 and 48 m2 pond, respectively [8, 9]. During the ASP, C. cryptica was used to investigate the lipid accumulation response during starvation for silicon, a macronutrient required by diatoms to synthesize their silicified cell walls, as well as to understand the properties of key enzymes involved in flux of carbon into lipid [10, 11]. More recently, based on a survey of 175 different microalgal strains, C. cryptica was selected as a top candidate for omega-3 fatty acid production, which is highly desirable for pharmaceutical and aquaculture applications, as well as a top producer of protein and nitrogen, suitable for agricultural feed [5]. In addition to having traits suited for commercial production, C. cryptica was the first chlorophyll-c containing algae to undergo stable nuclear transformation, a milestone in algal genetic engineering [12]. That study was the first of many significant advances in diatom genetic engineering, including determining the subcellular localization of proteins using GFP fusions, RNAi and antisense knockdowns, CRISPR, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN), and plasmid delivery via conjugation using an artificial episome [1318].
Fig. 1

Lipid accumulation in Cyclotella cryptica under silicon deprivation. Grayscale image of C. cryptica in (a) silicon replete medium, 0 h lipid uninduced, or (b) 48 h silicon deplete, lipid induced. c, d Respective composite images of chlorophyll autofluorescence (red) and fluorescent lipophilic dye BODIPY (green). e, f Differential interference contrast image of silicon replete (e) and 96 h silicon deplete, lipid induced, with red arrows identifying lipid droplets (f). Scale bars 5 μm

Although C. cryptica and other microalgal species have excellent native productivity characteristics, cost analyses [19] indicate that further improvements are necessary to make algal biofuel production economically competitive with fossil fuels. Genetically based approaches are required to establish robust improved-productivity phenotypes. Both random mutagenesis and directed genetic manipulation can be used to accomplish this. The latter requires knowledge of an organism’s genome sequence, and such information has successfully been used to identify targets for genetic manipulation in diatoms to improve lipid productivity [14, 17, 20, 21]. To identify appropriate gene targets for manipulation, a thorough understanding of the enzymes involved in central carbon metabolism is required, including the number of isozymes that catalyze each chemical reaction and the compartment-specific localization of enzymes or enzymatic processes within the cell. It is especially important to consider organellar compartmentation of metabolic processes in a diatom cell, which, because of diatoms’ secondary endosymbiotic origin, contain additional compartments relative to the green algae. This includes the periplastid compartment surrounding the chloroplast and endoplasmic reticulum that also surrounds the periplastid compartment around the chloroplast [2224]. Studying the diversity of core processes in carbon metabolism, such as glycolysis and fatty acid biosynthesis, within different lineages of algae [25, 26] as well as more closely within species of the same lineage [2729], may allow researchers to address why certain species are better suited for biofuel production than others. Differences in the organization of primary carbon metabolism between species likely reflect differences in efficiencies in processing carbon, which relates to factors controlling their productivity. Understanding the dissimilarities amongst microalgae will help elucidate what constitutes an optimized biofuel/bioproduct production system, and enable a production species to be manipulated to create the desired product in the most efficient manner. The availability of additional algal genome sequences has enabled a more thorough comparison of these diverse polyphyletic organisms to identify metabolic steps that may influence the organism’s productivity characteristics. These comparisons are also essential to understanding the complex evolutionary history and ecology of microalgae.

To bring the promising characteristics of C. cryptica in line with current day approaches to improve productivity, we sequenced the nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genomes, performed a detailed in silico analysis of the core metabolic processes involved in or competing with lipid production and compared these to other diatom genomes, in particular the closely related Thalassiosira pseudonana. To investigate whether epigenetic factors influence lipid accumulation or primary metabolism in general, bisulfite sequencing was performed to examine the methylome of cells under silicon replete and silicon-deplete, lipid induced conditions. We further developed C. cryptica by application of genetic tools including fluorescent protein tagging and the use of an inducible promoter using genetic constructs derived from T. pseudonana. Genome sequence and data generated from this analysis provides a foundation to further improve this species for large-scale biofuel/bioproducts production and provide insight into central carbon metabolism in diatoms.

Results and discussion

Genome sequence determination and assembly

Three libraries with different average insert lengths were prepared from purified C. cryptica genomic DNA (Additional file 1: Additional methods). These were sequenced as paired-end 76-mer + 76-mer reads on an Illumina GA-IIx 120-tiles/lane run. Two genomic DNA mate pair libraries (aiming for 10 K nucleotide effective inserts) were prepared and run by Illumina service on a 48-tile/lane v3 HiSeq flow cell. The paired-end and mate pair libraries contributed ~23.4 G nucleotides (nt) and ~57.4 G nt, respectively, for a total of ~80.8 G nt. The main genome assembly was performed with an ABySS 1.3.1 single end, paired-end, mate-pair pipeline. There were 116,817 genomic contigs and the N50 value was 11,951 bp (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

In addition to the genome assembly, transcriptomes (13 samples) were generated for C. cryptica using RNAseq data under silicon limitation and nitrogen limitation (Additional file 1: Additional methods). Estimates of mRNA abundance were calculated for each gene model in terms of fragments per kbp of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKMs) to identify relative transcript levels for all genes across all experimental conditions. Gene expression patterns will be analyzed in a subsequent study.

Genome statistics and gene model prediction

The estimated size of the haploid genome of C. cryptica was 161.7 Mbp, which is substantially larger than the 31 Mbp genome of T. pseudonana, a closely related model centric diatom. Similar to T. pseudonana, C. cryptica primarily exists in its vegetative state as diploid, and rarely undergoes sexual reproduction in controlled culture conditions. Multiple gene model prediction pipelines, including AUGUSTUS and MAKER, were evaluated to estimate the number of genes (Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional methods). The quality of predicted gene models was assessed by comparing C. cryptica RNAseq data and against manually curated T. pseudonana (version 3) gene models, which are supported by RNAseq and EST data [3032]. MAKER predicted the fewest genes (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S1), yet most of these models were supported by transcript data, and therefore, considered high confidence. However, intron and exon boundaries were improved in gene models from AUGUSTUS trained on the de novo C. cryptica RNA assembly. Despite these improvements, AUGUSTUS predicted a large proportion (30%) of fragmented, short gene models unsupported by transcript data (sum FPKM = 0.00, Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S1), which were presumed misscalls and removed from subsequent analysis. To leverage the strengths of the different predictors (boundary accuracy vs. expression-supported models), final ‘high-confidence’ gene models for C. cryptica are the set of AUGUSTUS gene models overlapping a MAKER prediction and assigned non-zero FPKM values (8133 genes). The total number of genes in C. cryptica per haploid genome, including the high confidence gene subset and all other AUGUSTUS models with RNAseq support was 21,121.
Table 1

Genomic features in Cyclotella cryptica and Thalassiosira pseudonana


C. cryptica

T. pseudonana

Cell size

8 × 10 μm


4 × 5 μm

Nuclear genome size

161.7 Mbp (GC 43%)


31 Mbp (GC 47%)

Repeatome (%)




 Classified repeats (%)




 Unclassified repeats (%)




Gene models

High confidence


T. pseudonana Joint Genome Institute models

Percent coding DNA




Gene density (genes/Mbp)




Total models




Average model length (bp)




Average number of exons per gene




Average exon length (bp)




Average number of introns per gene




Average intron length (bp)




Chloroplast genome size (bp)



Total chloroplast models



Mitochondrial genome size (bp)



Total mitochondrial models



T. pseudonana data from [30, 34]

Gene density in C. cryptica was 3.4× lower than the closely related model species T. pseudonana with 19% coding DNA compared to 66% (Table 1). While the total number of gene models in C. cryptica was nearly double that of T. pseudonana, it did not scale with the increase in genome size; the C. cryptica genome was 5.2× larger than T. pseudonana. This generally correlated with the logarithmic relationship between gene content and genome size in microeukaryotes as shown in [33]. The low gene density in C. cryptica can be attributed to a large quantity of repeat sequence, 53% of the genome. The majority of repeat sequence was detected using RepeatModeler, a program to identify de novo repeat families. RepeatModeler predicted 314,059 unclassified repeat elements totaling to 40% of the genome (Additional file 1: Table S2b). In addition to novel repeat families, 8.6% of the genome is comprised of long terminal repeat elements, characteristic of Class I retrotransposons (Additional file 1: Tables S2a, S2b), which are common to diatoms and are hypothesized to contribute to the diversity and ecological success of these organisms in the oceans [31, 34].

Cyclotella cryptica gene model repertoire

To determine the underlying basis for C. cryptica’s genetic characteristics relative to other diatoms, we defined orthologs and compared molecular divergence between C. cryptica and five other diatoms based on OrthoMCL, 18S phylogeny, and reciprocal best BLAST hit (RBH) analysis (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Figure S2). Thalassiosira pseudonana and C. cryptica were the most closely related centric diatoms based on 18S and percent identity of RBH pairs, with 5498 shared pairs between them and 63.6% average percent identity across all RBH pairs (Additional file 1: Figure S2).
Fig. 2

Cyclotella cryptica genetic components. Percentages reflect group relative to the total number of gene models in the species. a Comparison of genes between C. cryptica and T. pseudonana (JGI version 3). Over half the genes in C. cryptica (Cc) are not found in T. pseudonana (Tp). b Classification of C. cryptica specific genes (n = 11,244) relative to other diatom genomes. c Relative copy numbers of genes comparing C. cryptica and T. pseudonana (n = 9877). Percentages shown are based on the Cc total gene models. d Classification of T. pseudonana specific genes relative to other diatom genomes (n = 1899)

OrthoMCL uses a Markov Cluster algorithm to cluster putative orthologs across species and paralogs within species and is a powerful tool for comparative genomics and functional genome annotation [35]. Just under half of the genes have an orthologous match to T. pseudonana (9877 genes, 47%, Fig. 2a). By comparing all diatom genomes, we found 5008 genes (24% of total genes) were only found in C. cryptica, while 2699 genes (13%) shared a match to at least one other diatom but were absent in T. pseudonana, presumably due to gene loss (Fig. 2a, b). In addition, 17% of genes in C. cryptica are expanded orthologs to a gene(s) in T. pseudonana, which have resulted from either paralogous duplication or horizontal gene transfer in C. cryptica, or gene loss in T. pseudonana (Fig. 2b). 5738 genes were found in orthologous clusters where a gene in C. cryptica was present in equal copy numbers to genes in T. pseudonana, accounting for 27% of the total genes in C. cryptica (Fig. 2a, c). Based on the OrthoMCL data with these diatom genomes, the increase in gene content in C. cryptica relative to T. pseudonana is predominantly composed of unique genes not found in any other species, comprising 24% of the gene content. The proportion of unique genes in T. pseudonana was significantly less at 6% (Fig. 2b, d).

Genes unique to C. cryptica and not detected in the other diatoms contained minimal functional annotation based on KEGG, KOG, GO, Pfam, and TIGRfam; however, there was a notable enrichment in genes related to transposon processes, such as transposable element domains integrase (Pfam accession PF00665, 33 predicted genes), plant transposon gene (PF04827, 12 predicted genes), and reverse transcriptase (PF07727, 71 predicted genes). In contrast, the T. pseudonana genome contained only four genes with Integrase annotation, and one reverse transcriptase. These domains are indicators of mobile DNA elements, which are often responsible for genome size expansion. Given that C. cryptica and T. pseudonana have speciated relatively recently [36], the large amount of repetitive sequence with additional unique genes with transposable element annotation suggest that either C. cryptica has undergone a recent dramatic genome expansion event, more than doubling the amount of DNA and/or T. pseudonana has undergone a substantial genome deletion of repetitive sequence. The former scenario is favored due to the high number of C. cryptica unique genes with RNAseq support (Fig. 2b).

In addition to genes encoding mobile DNA element proteins, which were more abundant than those found in all other diatoms we analyzed, there was also an expansion of genes encoding proteins putatively involved in cell adhesion, signaling, and transport. Orthologous cluster (clust_77) contained 85 genes in C. cryptica with an enrichment of the discoidin domain, which is a glycoprotein putatively involved in carbohydrate binding and cytoskeletal organization [37]. In addition, relative to T. pseudonana, C. cryptica has two additional silicon transporters (clust_209, six copies total, including one partial sequence), and additional ATPases (clust_43, 67 copies) and phosphate and nitrate transporters (clust_248-NRT, Additional file 2). Since the C. cryptica cell is approximately twice as large in volume as T. pseudonana, it is reasonable to suggest that C. cryptica requires additional proteins at the cellular surface to compensate for the lower surface to volume ratio. Another possibility is that the expanded gene repertoire could allow for diversification function and metabolite flux. In addition to a nitrate transporter, C. cryptica possesses an additional plastid nitrate/formate transporter (g21971.t1), which may explain its high capacity for nitrogen assimilation, as shown in [5].

In previous studies, it has been demonstrated that up to 5% of diatom genes were proposed to arise via horizontal gene transfer [31]. We used the bioinformatic tool DarkHorse [38] to evaluate the contribution of horizontal gene transfer to gene expansion in C. cryptica (Additional file 2, DarkHorse). There were 16 unique genes of unknown function but matching viral sequences, however, most of these genes contained low levels of transcript and were not full length. Further analysis identified 312 genes (1.47% of total genes) with best matches to bacterial sequences, with 137 of those specific for Proteobacteria and 20 of cyanobacterial origin, a similar taxonomic grouping as found in [31]. Among these, there was an enrichment in genes belonging in the KOG class ‘Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism’, with 6 of 312 (1.92%) versus 69 of 21,121 (0.33%) overall. In addition to horizontally acquired genes identified by DarkHorse, many of the predicted proteins contained no matches to any previously sequenced organism (4175, 20% of genes), which suggest that they were either acquired from an uncharacterized organism, have rapidly evolved in C. cryptica, or this diatom lineage is significantly unrepresented in sequencing databases. While it is possible that some of these unique genes may be erroneously predicted, several proteins did contain at least one Pfam domain. Overall, the number of genes acquired horizontally appears to be similar to that found in previous studies in diatoms with smaller genome sizes, and the increase in gene number in C. cryptica is primarily due to the prevalence of unknown genes, similar to findings from OrthoMCL (Fig. 2b; Additional file 2). While the annotation of these genes is limited, given the high number of repetitive sequence and transposable elements, we hypothesize that many of these unique genes are cryptic ORFs created from transposition events, similar to what has been detected in higher plants [39, 40]. It must be noted that many candidate foreign genes identified using the DarkHorse analysis may also be ancestral genes of diatoms, acquired vertically or via endosymbiosis. Examples of these are genes matching to organisms within ‘SAR excluding diatoms’ (the subgroup containing Stramenopiles, Alveolates, and Rhizaria) and Excavata; these genes are found in C. cryptica but appear to have been lost in the other diatoms included in this analysis.

Methylation of the genome

DNA methylation can play a role in altering genome size and content by silencing genomic regions, and can have more dynamic effects in regulating expression of particular genes. The significant difference in genome size between C. cryptica with T. pseudonana and high levels of repetitive sequence prompted us to ask whether DNA methylation played a role in gene regulation and silencing of mobile DNA elements. Data from the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum indicated that DNA methylation profiles correlate with transcript levels in some genes controlling nitrogen metabolism [41], therefore, an examination of dynamic changes in methylation in C. cryptica was also undertaken. To determine the relationship between DNA methylation and silicon limitation, which, similar to nitrogen, is an essential macronutrient to diatoms, we performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing on cells under silicon replete conditions (0 h), and after 48-h silicon depletion. In addition to silicon-limitation associated phenomena, a dramatic induction of triacylglycerol (TAG) levels occurs after 48 h of starvation (Fig. 1b, d; [4, 42]).

The global per-cytosine (CG, CHH, CHG motifs, where H is any nucleotide but G) methylation level averaged in both conditions of the C. cryptica genome was 61% (Fig. 3a), the highest amount of DNA methylation in a diatom genome observed to date. Under both experimental conditions, methylation of cytosine sites was remarkably similar and bimodal (Additional file 1: Figure S3), suggesting that C. cryptica does not undergo substantial temporal shifts in overall methylation.
Fig. 3

DNA methylation in Cyclotella cryptica. a Percent genomic methylation under both conditions according to cytosine motif (denoted at left, H = A, T, or C nucleotides). b Fraction methylation across genomic contig g111188_00083. Blue silicon replete, red silicon deplete 48 h. Augustus V3 models depicted in black, Repeat Modeler data depicted in gray. c Fraction methylation across intergenic, repeat, and d gene body, exon, intron regions. Outliers in c and d have been removed

We found that in silicon replete, lipid uninduced (0 h) and 48 h silicon depletion, lipid induced conditions, methylation patterns across the whole genome were almost identical, with 98.7% correlation between the two conditions (Additional file 1: Figure S4). While [34, 41] detected shifts in DNA methylation under nutrient (nitrate) stress in P. tricornutum, studies in green microalgae suggest that dramatic changes in DNA methylation tend to occur primarily during cellular division [43, 44]. In C. cryptica, cell growth ceases almost immediately after silicon starvation, while under N limitation, cell cycle progression will still proceed until full arrest occurs, and thus the immediate cessation of cell cycle under silicon deprivation may preclude changes in methylation.

Consistent with studies in other diatoms [41, 45], methylation is predominantly at CpG dinucleotides, with low levels of CHH and CHG methylation (Fig. 3a). By comparison, the nuclear genome of T. pseudonana is 2.57% methylated, and Fragilariopsis cylindrus, with a genome of 81 Mbp, is 8.63% methylated [45]. Based on this study and previous methylome studies in other microalgae, there appears to be no strict correlation between overall methylation and genome size, as well as no pattern of DNA methylation within an algal class; for example, the global per-cytosine methylation of the chlorophytes Chlorella NC64A and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are 82.65 and <2% with genome sizes of 42 and 120 Mbp, respectively [44, 46, 47].

To assess what genomic features are methylated in C. cryptica, AUGUSTUS gene models and RepeatModeler data were overlaid against methylation levels across the largest assembled genomic contigs for both conditions. The majority of highly methylated regions aligned with repeat sequence (Fig. 3b; Additional file 1: Figure S5). This is consistent with other methylation studies which hypothesize that DNA methylation inhibits transposable element expansion and is commonly found across repeat regions [41, 48]. These highly repetitive/methylated regions were substantial, spanning as large as 30 kb (Fig. 3b; Additional file 1: Figure S5). Additionally, there were similarly sized hypomethylated regions that were gene-rich, and contained essentially no methylation. While the pattern of hypermethylated repetitive sequence and hypomethylated genic sequence is common, the striking large-scale binary distribution of genomic methylation has not been shown before in an algal species or other organisms and this unique genomic architecture may likely have influence on higher order chromatin structure in C. cryptica.

Methylation was minimal over gene sequences. There was a slight difference in the fraction of methylation in introns (3.23% on average) versus exons (4.14%) (Fig. 3c, d), a trend that is in agreement with that found in other organisms, including P. tricornutum [41]. Across the gene body, methylation gradually increased towards the 3′ direction and was lower 500 bp upstream compared to downstream (Additional file 1: Figure S6). Notably, there were higher levels of repetitive sequence in the 5′ upstream, hypomethylated region (Additional file 1: Figure S6), suggesting that these repeat elements are under a different control mechanism compared to the majority of repeats in the genome.

For genes with sufficient coverage to define a methylation status, 77% (averaged between both experimental conditions) were unmethylated and 23% were methylated (Additional file 1: Table S3). Methylated genes had an average methylation of 88% and had lower transcript levels with ~500 average FPKM across all transcriptomes. Unmethylated genes had an average methylation of 7% and had significantly higher levels of transcript (average ~4500 FPKM, Additional file 1: Table S3).

There was no linear correlation between fraction methylation and FPKM in either condition, however, three general populations appeared (Additional file 1: Figure S7). The first consisted of genes with very little transcript abundance (ranging from 0 to 10 FPKM), almost all of which (95%) were methylated (Additional file 1: Figure S7a, box i). The second population, similar to findings from [41], comprised the majority of genes which contained moderate to high transcript abundance and were largely unmethylated (Additional file 1: Figure S7b). Lastly, and somewhat surprisingly, there appeared to be several genes with moderate to high FPKM levels with high levels of methylation (average FPKM values ranging from 4600 to 161,000, Additional file 1: Figure S7b, box iii, Additional file 2). Functional annotation of these genes indicated enrichment in genes with transporter activity and/or an interaction with the cell surface. These included a nitrate transporter (g14234.t1), silicon transporter (g21035.t1), sodium-dicarboxylate symporter (g11380.t1, g10492.t1), sulfate transporter (g6964.t1), and a bacterially derived integrin (g18136.t1). In addition, genes involved in nitrogen metabolism, including the above nitrate transporter, as well as nitrate reductase (g22809.t1) and glutamate synthetase (g14060.t1) were also in this subpopulation. Highly methylated, highly expressed genes may be indicative of a unique role DNA methylation plays in these specific cellular functions. Methylation status of these genes did not change under our experimental conditions. Additionally, the absence of DNA methylation based silencing in these genes may indicate other epigenetic regulatory mechanisms that enable active transcription are at play. An example is histone tail acetylation, which has been shown to have a strong activating effect in P. tricornutum regardless of methylation status [49].

Investigations in P. tricornutum identified methylation shifts in nitrate metabolism genes under depletion conditions [41, 49], indicating that DNA methylation may play a regulatory role in nitrate metabolism in diatoms. We identified no significant change in methylation of genes pertaining to silicon metabolism or lipid accumulation under our conditions, instead there was a globally significant correlation of methylation between the two conditions. This data suggests that DNA methylation does not control the cell’s silicon status response in these conditions as is reported with nitrate metabolism in P. tricornutum. One explanation for these differences could be the fact that nitrogen stress on diatoms can cause severe cellular damage and detrimental effects, such as chlorosis and DNA and protein degradation [28, 50], whereas silicon starvation does not produce as severe phenotypes [32, 42, 51].

We also determined whether there was a relation between the methylation status of genes and their evolutionary origin. We applied the DarkHorse analysis to identify possible horizontally transferred genes, and identified 1723 genes (41% of total methylated genes) that contained a top BLAST hit to diatoms, however, in comparing the proportion of diatom-derived genes within the subset of methylated genes, this number is significantly depleted relative to the proportion of diatom-shared genes in the whole genome (72% of the total, Fig. 4a). There was enrichment in methylated genes with no known taxonomic match (‘unknown,’ 1956 genes, 47% of total methylated genes versus 20% of all genes, Fig. 4b). There was also enrichment of methylated Opisthokont genes (Fungi, Metazoan, Choanoflagellida, Ichthyosporea), which were primarily annotated for transposon processes (Fig. 4a; Additional file 2). Within the methylated subset of genes, there was a slightly higher proportion of foreign genes (i.e., viral, bacterial) as well as genes ancestral to the cell, but not core to diatom function, indicated by loss in other diatom genomes (groups SAR excluding diatoms, Archaeplastida, Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4

Methylation based on evolutionary origin of genes from DarkHorse analysis. a Enrichment analysis of methylated genes given their taxonomic group. Enrichment of methylation within a taxonomic group was determined by subtracting the proportion of genes methylated within a taxonomic group from the proportion of genes methylated across the C. cryptica genome. Groups with numbers below 0 have a lower proportion of methylated genes in the taxonomic group compared to the proportion of this group in the overall genome. b Percent of methylated and unmethylated genes relative to taxonomic group. Top numbers are the total number of genes from that group in the genome

In general, methylated genes in C. cryptica are not highly expressed and appear to be non-essential under our conditions. Furthermore, there appears to be a slight preference to methylate genes that are horizontally acquired, perhaps as a silencing strategy to prevent potential detrimental effects of the foreign gene. Alternatively, it could also indicate that the mechanism for foreign gene insertion in eukaryotic microalgae, which is largely unknown, is more likely to occur in hypermethylated regions than in hypomethylated regions of the genome (Fig. 4b).

Lastly, using the same definitions of gene methylation as in Additional file 1: Additional methods, we compared methylation levels of genes in T. pseudonana from [5, 45] to the 0 h methylome of C. cryptica. Only 139 genes (1% of the total) in T. pseudonana were methylated and out of 24 T. pseudonana methylated genes with orthologs in C. cryptica, only five were methylated in both diatoms. Shared methylated genes were annotated as reverse transcriptases (g23181.t1, g15433.t1), and transposase IS4 (g9451.t1). The significantly low number of genes with shared methylation status in the two diatoms suggests a conserved role for methylation in these centric diatoms to mask and silence mobile DNA elements. Furthermore, while DNA methylation does not appear to temporally regulate genes in C. cryptica under our conditions, the comparison of these two diatom methylomes showed that both were associated with transposable element silencing. It has been demonstrated in higher plants that transposable element silencing has effects on the expression of nearby genes [52]. The methylation of the few genes found in hypermethylated regions (Fig. 3b) in C. cryptica may have resulted from the methylation of a nearby transposable element insertion and any resulting changes in gene expression could have downstream effects on the metabolism and function of that organism.

Predicted subcellular localization of enzymes

An overarching theme in the study of diatom metabolism is the diversity of intracellular localization of enzymes in different organelles: the mitochondrion, cytosol, chloroplast, ER, and the periplastid compartment [2224, 26, 27, 53]. The latter of these compartments is unique to photosynthetic eukaryotes that have undergone a secondary (or greater) endosymbiotic event. In addition, specific to heterokonts, the ER is extended and surrounds the chloroplast. Using in silico tools as a means to map the location of metabolic processes in the cell provides a clearer description of metabolic function and transport of metabolites and proteins in and out of these organelles and information for accurate modeling. We used SignalP 3.0, TargetP, Predotar, ChloroP, HECTAR, and ASAFind to predict which proteins are putatively targeted to the organelles in C. cryptica (Fig. 5; Additional file 1: Additional methods; [5458]). The first four in silico organellar prediction programs are developed for higher plants and other eukaryotes, but we have found their collective use to be suitable for some basic understanding of metabolic compartmentation in diatoms, particularly when overlaid with coordinate expression patterns of particular genes [27, 32]. The latter two programs, HECTAR and ASAFind are specific for heterokonts, and take advantage of the conserved amino acid sequence motif (ASA-FAP) which is part of the N-terminal bipartite signal peptide that is unique to these genera of algae. Given sequence manipulations [2224] that have identified specific amino acid substitutions within that conserved motif resulting in altered organellar targeting of an enzyme, it is feasible to use these prediction programs to hypothesize which proteins are partitioned into the chloroplast versus periplastid compartment. Because of the uniqueness of the periplastid compartment, we focused our analysis on proteins targeted there. Targeting of enzymes to other compartments will be described in the context of the metabolic processes analysis below. We identified a total of 120 proteins with targeted prediction to the periplastid compartment (Additional file 3).
Fig. 5

In silico targeting predictions of all nuclear gene models in C. cryptica. Percentages are listed in the chart. See also Additional file 2, subcellular targeting. targeting predictions used for this specific analysis were SignalP 3.0, TargetP, ChloroP, HECTAR, Predotar, and ASAFind [43, 44, 5558]

Moog and colleagues [24] characterized the predicted proteome of the periplastid compartment (PPC) in P. tricornutum and concluded that some important cellular functions occurred there, specifically with regard to transport and protein import processes into the chloroplast, but that very few protein components of housekeeping biochemical pathways were present. Using direct localization approaches, they also documented that only 55% of proteins predicted to be targeted to the PPC actually were confirmed to be there, highlighting the poor state of predictive programs, perhaps due to transmembrane domains near the N-terminus, or mis-predicted signal cleavage sites.

Our analysis generally corroborated the findings of [24], with some exceptions, and potential new findings (Additional file 3). We identified one protein (g12899.t1) with an ANTH domain which may be putatively involved in clathrin assembly, as well as a dynamin, which is likely involved in chloroplast division (g1668.t1), suggesting that components of clathrin-mediated vesicular trafficking may be present in the PPC. Another protein, g23203.t1, is a member of the S2P/M50 family of regulated intramembrane proteolysis proteases, which use proteolytic activity within the membrane to transfer information across as a means to integrate gene expression with physiologic stresses occurring in another cellular compartment [59]. Mechanisms of cross-talk between the cytoplasm and chloroplast of diatoms have not been well addressed in the literature, but of necessity, would require the involvement of the PPC.

Lastly, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC—g7839.t1) and several carbonic anhydrases were predicted to be PPC targeted, consistent with a mechanism to recapture CO2 lost from the chloroplast by inefficient carbon fixation assimilation and incorporate it into oxaloacetate. Experimental validation using genetic constructs to confirm localization of predicted enzymes in the PPC and other organelles is needed to confirm in silico analyses. Nevertheless, the prediction programs, particularly on a proteome with accurate prediction of correct N-termini based on RNAseq data, offer a starting point to further characterize the significance of the PPC in diatoms.

Comparative analysis of glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and the pyruvate hub

Glycolysis, the catabolism of glucose to produce pyruvate, and the reverse pathway gluconeogenesis, are core metabolic pathways which process photosynthetically fixed carbon into compounds and energy for use by the cell. Pyruvate metabolism is involved in the distribution of carbon to different cellular processes, which include biosynthesis of compounds and energy generation. While genes and predicted subcellular localization of steps in these processes were generally conserved between the oleaginous C. cryptica and relatively non-oleaginous T. psuedonana, there were several important differences in the architecture of the pyruvate hub in three different intracellular locations.

Cyclotella cryptica has an additional copy of plastid-localized pyruvate kinase (Figs. 6, 7i), a key glycolytic regulatory enzyme that catalyzes the unidirectional conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and ADP to pyruvate and ATP. In addition, the gene encoding plastid-localized PEP synthase (PEPS) which catalyzes the reciprocal reaction to produce PEP from pyruvate, is heavily methylated (96% fraction methylation) with low transcript (average FPKM 0.61) abundance. This suggests that under the conditions tested, PEPS may be silenced by methylation (Fig. 7ii), and can be assumed to be non-functional. In contrast, the plastid PEPS gene is homologous to the single copy of PEPS found in T. pseudonana, which shows moderate levels of expression and is unmethylated (0.19% across gene body) under similar experimental conditions [32, 45].
Fig. 6

Comparative analysis of key carbon metabolic pathways between C. cryptica and T. pseudonana. Different colored boxes denote subcellular location of a given enzyme based on bioinformatic targeting predictions. Number within the box indicates how many enzyme copies are targeted to that location. Numbers to the right of boxes are total gene copy number found in the genome. Question marks indicate weak targeting and/or inconsistencies between targeting prediction programs. Superscript numbers on enzymes indicate the number of genes found with partial sequence in C. cryptica at the N-terminus, thereby not containing targeting prediction. Red numbers are methylated genes. In the case of MGAT or DGTT, one of the four ER predicted genes is methylated. AAK14816-like putative glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, ACC acetyl-CoA carboxylase, AGPAT 1-acyl-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, BGS 1,3 β-glucan synthase, DGAT diacylglycerol acyltransferase, DGTT diacylglycerol acyltransferase type 2, ENO enolase, ENR enoyl-ACP reductase, FBA fructose bisphosphate aldolase, FBP fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase, GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, GLK glucokinase, GPI glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, GPAT glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, HD 3-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydratase, KAR 3-ketoacyl-ACP reductase, KAS 3-ketoacyl-ACP synthase, LCLAT1 lysocardiolipin acyltransferase 1, LPLAT lysophospholipid acyltransferase, MAT malonyl-CoA-ACP transacylase, MDH malate dehydrogenase, ME malic enzyme, MGAT monoacylglycerol acyltransferase, PAP phosphatidic acid phosphatase, PYC pyruvate carboxylase, PDRP pyruvate phosphate dikinase regulatory protein, PEPC phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, PEPCK phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, PEPS phosphoenolpyruvate synthase, PFK phosphofructokinase, PGAM phosphoglycerate mutase, PGK phosphoglycerate kinase, PGM phosphoglucomutase, PK pyruvate kinase, PPDK pyruvate phosphate dikinase, TPI triose phosphate isomerase, UAP UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase, UGP UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase

Fig. 7

Metabolic overview highlighting key findings from Cyclotella cryptica genome. Red numbers are referred to in the text. Enzymatic abbreviations are listed in Fig. 5. ED Entner–Doudoroff, IM inner membrane, OM outer membrane, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, Fru6P fructose-6-phosphate, 3PG glycerate 3-phosphate, OAA oxaloacetate, PPP pentose phosphate pathway

In C. cryptica, there are two isozymes of PEPS localized in the cytosol not found in T. pseudonana (Figs. 6, 7iii). Generation of PEP from pyruvate in the cytosol instead of the plastid would separate a reaction that utilizes pyruvate from a reaction that produces pyruvate, potentially improving the efficiency of pyruvate utilization for processes such as fatty acid synthesis in the plastid of C. cryptica. The methylation of PEPS, along with additional copies of PEPS in the cytosol might further allow for an increased degree of fine-scale regulation of this important node of metabolism. The extra copy of plastid-localized PK in C. cryptica relative to T. pseudonana could indicate a greater potential for pyruvate production in C. cryptica, possibly translating into a greater fatty acid synthesis capability (Fig. 7).

There were also differences in the mitochondrial pyruvate hub between the two species. T. pseudonana lacks a mitochrondrial-localized pyruvate carboxylase (PYC), which converts pyruvate to oxaloacetate (OAA), yet possesses a cytosolic copy, whereas C. cryptica has a mitochondrial but not cytoplasmic PYC (Figs. 6, 7iv). This suggests that C. cryptica can produce OAA via pyruvate in the mitochondria, but T. pseudonana would have to generate it elsewhere then import into mitochondria, via a malate–aspartate shuttle. In addition to the differential requirement for transport, metabolic drivers for possible mitochondrial gluconeogenesis may differ in the two species, since in C. cryptica, gluconeogenesis could be initiated within the mitochondrion by conversion of pyruvate to PEP by the combined action of PYC and PEPCK.

Lipid metabolism

The genetic basis for enhanced lipid productivity in C. cryptica was investigated by identifying genes for fatty acid and TAG biosynthesis, as well as fatty acid modification biosynthesis, and comparing this repertoire with that found in T. pseudonana. An identical suite of plastid-localized essential fatty acid biosynthesis orthologs from T. pseudonana were found in C. cryptica (Fig. 6). There were differences in the TAG biosynthesis enzyme inventory between the two diatoms, such as the presence of several additional genes found in C. cryptica and subcellular localization predictions (Fig. 6). An additional three genes possessing an LPLAT_MGAT-like domain found in either MGAT or DGTT enzymes were present in C. cryptica. One of these putative MGAT/DGTT (g3706.t1) had highly abundant transcripts (average FPKM of 23,833). Another putative MGAT/DGTT (g21947.t1) is a homolog to the P. tricornutum DGTT2b, which has been tested as a target for genetic manipulation to increase TAG content [60, 61]. There were also two additional copies of DGAT1: one with predicted targeting to the ER (g23184.t1), and the other (g9565.t1) was a partial sequence, hence targeting could not be determined. The additional copies of these enzymes in C. cryptica may indicate an increased ability to generate TAG and/or allow for finer control over TAG production in the case that these enzymes differ in their specificity, regulation or kinetic properties (Fig. 7v).

Omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs) are a high-value product that is of interest for nutritional purposes [5]. Cyclotella cryptica synthesizes abundant LC-PUFAs including over 16% eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 4% docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) of the total fatty acids; generally a higher level than in other algal species [5]. We investigated if the higher capacity to produce these biotechnologically relevant fatty acids was due to an increase gene number within the fatty acid elongases and desaturases, which encode for the enzymes that catalyze the biosynthesis of LC-PUFAs. Overall, elongases and desaturases potentially involved in LC-PUFA synthesis were highly conserved between C. cryptica and T. pseudonana (Fig. 6). Although C. cryptica contained fewer copies of type 1 desaturases, it had all the types including Δ5, Δ6, Δ8, Δ9, Δ11 and Δ12. Both diatoms contain a single copy of a Δ4 desaturase that catalyzes the addition of the sixth double bond to docosapentaenoic acid (22:5) chain to make DHA (C22:6) [20]. The existence of the same types of elongases and desaturases in both diatoms suggest that the greater ability of C. cryptica to produce EPA compared to T. pseudonana is not due to an increase in isozymes in the genome and could be more dependent on the flux of carbon from upstream processes into this pathway.

Carbohydrate biosynthesis and degradation

Chrysolaminarin, the main form of storage carbohydrate in diatoms, is a water soluble β-(1-3) linked glucan, and is stored outside of the plastid in a large vacuole [36, 62]. In diatoms, genes involved in biosynthesis and degradation of chrysolaminarin have been annotated, and the biochemistry of key enzymatic steps has been characterized [10, 53, 63]. The gene repertoire for chrysolaminarin biosynthesis enzymes is highly conserved between T. pseudonana and C. cryptica in terms of sequence similarity and predicted targeting (Fig. 6). Like other stramenopiles, C. cryptica possesses a fused cytosolic phosphoglucomutase/UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase, which carries out the first two-enzymatic steps toward chrysolaminarin production [53]. Both T. pseudonana and C. cryptica also possess three individual copies of phosphoglucomutase and UTP glucose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase similarly distributed between the plastid and cytosol. The metabolic significance of the fused gene and multiple single gene copies leading to chrysolaminarin production is unknown, yet might provide metabolic flexibility by creating several routes toward synthesis that differ in organellar location (plastid vs. cytosol), carbon transporter specificity out of the plastid (Glu-6P versus UDP-glucose), and enhanced efficiency or substrate channeling (fused protein versus single reaction proteins). While these enzymatic steps have an intriguing metabolic flexibility, the final step in chrysolaminarin production, catalyzed by a beta-glucan synthase, does not. The β-glucan synthase is present as a single copy and highly conserved in all sequenced diatom genomes.

In contrast to the chrysolaminarin biosynthetic pathway, genes coding for enzymes involved in the degradation of chrysolaminarin were poorly conserved between T. pseudonana and C. cryptica with an average low percent identity between homologs (51%). The C. cryptica genome encodes four additional enzymes putatively involved in chrysolaminarin breakdown compared to T. pseudonana (two additional endoglucanases, two additional exoglucosidases, Figs. 6, 7vi). Of the three ER predicted exoglucosidases, two were found only in C. cryptica, presumably recently acquired by horizontal transfer. The most highly expressed exoglucosidase in C. cryptica (g19489.t1) is unique, with low similarity compared with those of higher plants and fungi. In addition to the two-glycosyl hydrolase domains responsible for carbohydrate breakdown, the gene also contains two fascin-like domains, putatively involved in actin crosslinking, which implies a positioning component to its function. The increased number of chrysolaminarin degradation enzymes in C. cryptica compared to T. pseudonana may indicate a greater capacity to break down β-1,3 glucans, allowing for more carbon substrate to be used for the production of triacylglycerol or other carbon products.

Chitin biosynthesis and degradation

Chitin, or poly β-(1,4) linked N-acetylglucosamine, is the most abundant polymer in the ocean, and second most on the planet [64, 65]. The exoskeleton of arthropods and insects is made of chitin, and chitin is also produced by many diatoms where it has been proposed to control buoyancy and/or be involved in silica cell wall synthesis [6668]. Chitin is estimated to comprise over 30% of the mass of the cell in some diatom species [69], which is a significant reservoir for cellular carbon that could be shunted into other pathways to facilitate productivity in a controlled cultivation environment. However, little is known about the cellular role of chitin, the biosynthetic pathway is poorly characterized, and annotation of relevant genes in diatoms is incomplete. In C. cryptica, most enzymes involved in synthesis and degradation of chitin are predicted to be cytosolic or ER targeted (Fig. 8)—the latter may indicate extracellular secretion, plasma membrane localization, or an association with the silica deposition vesicle.
Fig. 8

Chitin metabolism in C. cryptica. a Genes and their predicted subcellular localization. Organizational schematic as described in Fig. 6. b Hypothetical chitin biosynthesis and degradation pathway in C. cryptica. Dashed line indicates that the enzyme is not found in C. cryptica

Chitin fibrils are apparently located between the silica frustule and plasma membrane [69], yet the intracellular site of chitin production is unknown, therefore we investigated the targeting of enzymes predicted to be involved in this process for additional insight. The first and rate-limiting enzyme of the chitin synthase complex is glucosamine fructose 6-P aminotransferase, of which C. cryptica contains four putative copies (Fig. 8a). Three of those copies are predicted by several programs to have mitochondrial targeting, perhaps suggesting direct utilization of mitochondrial-produced glutamine from the glutamate–glutamine cycle. However, fructose-6P is not produced in the mitochondria and would need to be transported there. Cyclotella cryptica GFATs all also have less well supported ER signal peptides, which may also indicate targeting through the ER to a different cellular location. In both T. pseudonana and C. cryptica there are three steps in the pathway represented by a single isozyme, all with cytosolic targeting prediction. The final step of chitin biosynthesis polymerizes the N-acetyl-d-glucosamine molecules by chitin synthase (CS) to produce chitin. There are five full copies of CS, which contain the chitin_synth_C domain, and two partial sequences in C. cryptica (Fig. 8a). These Division 2 chitin synthases have been found only within Thalassiosirales diatoms, of which C. cryptica is a member, and were distinct from the Division 1 enzymes found in the pennate diatoms [70, 71]. Since Thalassiosirales all secrete chitin fibrils, whereas pennate species do not; these chitin synthases could be involved with fibril formation.

Cyclotella cryptica has a nearly complete chitin degradation pathway including a substantial number of chitinases, 22 in total, which perform the first step in chitin degradation (Fig. 8). Similar numbers were reported in T. pseudonana [68]. Most of the chitinases are shared within the Thalassiosirales group and have similarity to either bacterial (13 copies) or fungal (7 copies) chitinases. It is unknown when or why diatoms would break down chitin, but the number of chitinase genes combined with their general transcript abundance in C. cryptica, suggests that they play an important if not as yet elucidated role in cellular processes. Four chitinases also contain one or two peritrophin A domains. In insects and other multicellular organisms, peritrophin is a protein embedded within a chitinous membrane (the peritrophin matrix) which separates digested food from the midgut epithelium where it is hypothesized to aid in digestion, protect against pathogens, and provide mechanical support [72]. In T. weissflogii, freeze fracture images of the space between the plasma membrane and silica frustule revealed structures with the appearance of chitin fibrils [69], which raises the possibility that peritrophin-containing chitinases in C. cryptica may be found in a similar matrix as an organic component of the cell wall. This might suggest that a dynamic processing of chitin, involving synthesis and degradation, occurs in this location. In addition to the chitinases, other chitin binding genes in C. cryptica possessed Peritrophin A domains which have also been identified in T. pseudonana [73].

Two recently duplicated gene copies encoding the subsequent step in chitin degradation, the breakdown of chitobiose catalyzed by hexosaminidase, are ER targeted in C. cryptica (g14774.t1, g22243.t1). A homolog could not be identified in T. pseudonana. Furthermore, even with a manual search, we were unable to identify a kinase that phosphorylates the acetyl glucosamine molecule to break down chitin to fructose-6-phosphate in any diatom genome (Fig. 8). It is possible that N-acetylglucosamine kinase was not well annotated and/or is distinct from characterized copies, making it difficult to identify, but may also suggest that diatoms lack the ability to breakdown chitin to a form that can be fed into glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, or possess a novel mechanism to do so (Fig. 7vii).

Carbon transport within the cell

Intracellular carbon flux relies on the transport of metabolites between organelles, which connects otherwise disjointed pathways. An annotation of carbon transporters is essential to develop a more accurate metabolic map of carbon flux. This may be especially important in diatoms, which are highly compartmentalized as a result of their origin through secondary endosymbiosis. The C. cryptica genome was screened to identify a provisional list of intracellular organic carbon flux transporters by selecting Pfam and Reactome annotations containing matches to any mono- or disaccharide molecule. Examples of annotated transporters included the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS), Sugar and other transporter (MFS, Pfam00083), Triose-phosphate/phosphate translocator (TPT, Pfam03151), or the UAA transporter family (Pfam08449). TPT and UAA are specific for monosaccharide-based molecules, with the latter also including transporters for UDP-N-acetylglucosamine, a component of chitin. The MFS transporters have diverse substrate specificity, but the multi-domain Pfam00083 can include simple sugar phosphates. Homologs were identified for nearly all putative TPTs identified in P. tricornutum, (TPT1-TPT13) ([74]; Additional file 4). Using the same naming conventions as [74], C. cryptica has an additional TPT2, TPT4b (named TPT4c, g4485.t1), and TPT8 (no PFam domain, but high similarity TPT8), as well as three additional genes containing the TPT domain, of which two contain homologs in T. pseudonana, and one is unique to C. cryptica −g10651.t1. Neither of the TPT2 genes in C. cryptica has a bipartite leader sequence, whereas the P. tricornutum proteins were directly localized to the periplastid/cER membrane [74]. While it is possible that either or both TPT2 in C. cryptica are localized to the periplastid/cER membrane, the potential differential targeting between the two diatoms could imply an alteration of carbon flux processes. In addition, the presence of another chloroplast targeted TPT4b, could indicate differences in flux into and out of the plastid or differential regulation [74] compared to P. tricornutum (Additional file 4).

Given the possible differences in pyruvate processing between C. cryptica and T. pseudonana described earlier, we investigated the complement of pyruvate transporters in both species. We identified an ortholog to the sodium coupled pyruvate transporter identified in Arabidopsis and subsequently in T. pseudonana which is proposed to transport pyruvate into the plastid envelope (g5998.t1) [63, 75]. We also identified a putative mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC), which is orthologous to the MPC1 and 2 identified in humans, Drosophila, and yeast [76, 77] the first of its kind identified in diatoms. While in other organisms the complex is formed of two or three subunits, it appears that C. cryptica and other diatoms have a fused single gene that contains both MPC 1 and 2 (g13004.t1). MPC is thought to be a significant source of pyruvate transport into the mitochondria to be fed into the TCA cycle. However, since diatoms should be able to generate pyruvate via mitochondrial glycolysis (Fig. 6, [27, 53]), the role of this pyruvate transporter may be different, perhaps in diatoms it can transport pyruvate out of the mitochondria (Fig. 7viii).

A distinguishing metabolic feature of C. cryptica is the ability to grow truly heterotrophically on d-glucose and d-galactose, while other diatoms with sequenced genomes are thought to be obligate autotrophs [7881]. Heterotrophic growth is useful for maximizing growth rates and attainable biomass in large scale production; by reducing respiratory losses at night or a strict dependence on light regimes [82]. Active transport of glucose or carbon substrates at the plasma membrane via the activity of hexose transporters is required for heterotrophic growth. This was demonstrated by the trophic conversion of P. tricornutum from obligate phototrophy to facultative heterotrophy through introduction of a hexose transporter [83]. Seven candidate genes in the C. cryptica genome encoded putative triose or hexose transporters [84] (Fig. 9). Orthologs of most of these were found in the obligate phototroph T. pseudonana, suggesting that they are likely involved in intracellular sugar transport. A T. pseudonana ortholog could not be identified for the most highly expressed putative sugar transporter (g22001.t1). The top BLASTp hits to this predicted sugar transporter were to characterized hexose transporters in yeast, and this gene clustered with hexose transporters in Chlorella kessleri (abbreviated Chkle), higher plants, and yeast (Fig. 9). There is low similarity (37% identity) to a partial gene in the diatoms T. oceanica (Thaoc_04845) and Fragilariopsis cylindrus (Fracy_175852), as well as hits to other microalgae E. huxleyi (Emihu) and N. gaditana (Nanga), with similar percent identities. We hypothesize that this gene is a good candidate for encoding a transporter responsible for glucose uptake in C. cryptica (Fig. 7ix).
Fig. 9

Phylogenetic analysis of hexose transporters in C. cryptica (Cyccr) and T. pseudonana (Thaps). All genes contain PF00083 Sugar (and other) transporter domain. Highlighted gene is hypothetical heterotrophic glucose transporter in C. cryptica and with nearest matches to that transporter found in the diatoms T. oceanica, F. cylindrus, the haptophyte E. huxleyi, and stramenopile N. gaditana. Phylogeny was generated using default parameters in RAxML_GUI v1.3 and is mid-point rooted. Abbreviations and accession numbers are found in Additional file 4

Tool development for genetic manipulation and microscopy

The use of genetic engineering tools is crucial for the development of industrially relevant species for production because it allows investigation of cellular metabolism and enables enhancement of the species’ characteristics to increase production efficiency. While successful nuclear transformation of C. cryptica was achieved during the ASP [12], there has been little molecular work since. To improve the tools available for C. cryptica, we further adapted the nuclear transformation procedure, tested two T. pseudonana expression vectors and constructed one using C. cryptica sequences (Additional file 1: Additional methods). Two vectors allow for constitutively high expression, one of which uses native C. cryptica ribosomal protein L41 promoter and terminator sequences, while the second vector was derived from the T. pseudonana fcp gene [13]. The third vector, utilizing the T. pseudonana nitrate reductase (NR) promoter and terminator enables conditional expression, being induced upon transfer of nitrogen source from ammonia to nitrate [85]. Imaging of GFP under control of the NR promoter in C. cryptica grown in nitrate and ammonium is shown in Fig. 10. The larger size of C. cryptica (8–10 μm) compared to T. pseudonana (4–5 μm) and P. tricornutum (4–5 μm) may facilitate microscopy for identification of subcellular localization of enzymes. While vectors with native promoters and native sequence are important in some contexts, the successful utilization of pre-existing molecular tools from T. pseudonana in C. cryptica reduces effort and could facilitate development of specific applications.
Fig. 10

Genetic manipulation in C. cryptica. Conditional expression using the nitrate reductase promoter. a GFP expression in ASW media, with nitrate as the nitrogen source. b No GFP expression in repressive modified ASW media, with ammonia as the nitrogen source. Chlorophyll and GFP are falsely colored red and green, respectively. Composite images are 3D reconstructions. Scale bars 5 μm


Determination of the genome sequence of C. cryptica elucidates metabolic features that underlie its high productivity and lipid accumulation ability, and the application of state-of-the-art approaches to further develop this species featured in the Aquatic Species Program for biofuel/bioproduct production [4]. Diatoms in general have attractive characteristics for large-scale biofuel/bioproduct production. In addition to their innate high productivity, their distinctive lipid induction stimulus by silicon starvation leads to rapid and substantial increases in triacylglycerol levels [6, 26, 42] without detrimental effects on cellular protein content that would typically occur under nitrogen starvation conditions used in other microalgae. Thus, they could serve as both a biofuel precursor and protein source in a production system.

A dominant feature of the C. cryptica genome is the presence of large regions of repeat sequences encoding a variety of types of mobile genetic elements (Additional file 1: Table S2) which are highly methylated, presumably as a means to inhibit expansion of these elements. In a global sense, in the conditions tested, methylation does not appear to play a significant role in regulating metabolic gene expression, however, there are notable and important exceptions in the examples of highly methylated yet highly expressed genes (Additional file 1: Figure S7), and the chloroplast-localized PEPS gene which is highly methylated and not expressed (Fig. 7ii). There are a few, yet significant, differences in gene content and metabolic topology when comparing C. cryptica and T. pseudonana, which may underlie the former’s high productivity. In particular, pyruvate metabolism is substantially different, with C. cryptica potentially being able to process pyruvate with greater efficiency because of compartmental separation of distinct reaction steps comparing the chloroplast and cytoplasm, and intercompartmental processing in the mitochondria, avoiding a transport step (Figs. 6, 7). Additional isozymes involved in TAG synthesis and carbohydrate breakdown are present in C. cryptica, which may improve carbon flux into TAG synthesis (Figs. 6, 7v, vi). Characterization of these metabolic differences, and those involved in other potential carbon sinks such as chitin, identifies a variety of gene targets to manipulate to directly test these hypotheses, and to understand how the differences in carbon flux may affect productivity, with a goal of ultimately improving productivity. The heterotrophic capability of C. cryptica may further aid in increasing productivity, either by enabling heterotrophic production or reducing respiratory losses at night from photosynthetically-fixed carbon. The application of state-of-the-art genetic tools to C. cryptica (Fig. 10), and continued development of such, will enable reprogramming of the metabolism otherwise adapted for environmental survival to improve productivity in the relatively controlled conditions for large-scale production. By bringing the promising productivity characteristics of C. cryptica in line with current day approaches to improve productivity, its potential as a model biofuel/bioproduct organism can be maximized.


Source of genetic material

Genomic DNA for genome and methylome sequencing was isolated from a clonal culture of C. cryptica, CCMP332. This strain of C. cryptica was originally isolated in June of 1956 from the West Tisbury Great Pond (41.355° N, 70.655° W) in MA, USA and maintained and by the National Center for Marine Algae and Microbiota (NCMA, formerly Provasoli–Guillard National Centre for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton CCMP). CCMP332 has been maintained in the lab since 2008 under a 12:12 light–dark cycle at 18 °C with an illumination of 150 μmol/m2 s light. For genomic DNA isolation, C. cryptica was plated onto artificial seawater (ASW) agar plates [86] under the presence of 1:1000 dilution of penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, catalog no. 15140-122) to minimize bacterial contamination. A single colony was picked and grown in liquid ASW for scale up. 1 L liquid cultures were mixed using a magnetic stir plate (250 rpm), bubbled with air, and grown in continuous light (150 μmol/m2 s) for 3 days to early stationary phase (~1.2 × 106 cells/mL) before harvesting for DNA isolation. To isolate DNA for methylome analysis, a 2.5 L culture was grown using above conditions to mid exponential phase (5 × 105 cells/mL). On the third day, 300 mL of liquid culture was harvested for the T = 0, silicon replete time point for genomic DNA isolation. 1500 mL of cells was harvested by centrifugation and placed into ASW deprived of silica (Si-ASW) as described in [42]. Cells were monitored for 48 h in Si-ASW before harvesting 300 mL DNA for Si-T = 48 methylome. Cells were stained for 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY 493/503, Molecular Probes) as described in [42] and imaged using a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 Inverted Microscope at a 63× objective. Cell growth was monitored using a Neubauer hemocytometer with counts done in duplicate or quadruplicate.

Functional annotation

Functional annotation of genes from C. cryptica and the five other reference diatom genomes was performed using PhyloDB, a comprehensive database of proteins at JCVI. KEGG, KO, KO Pathway, EC annotations were assigned using TimeLogic® Tera-BLAST™ algorithm (Active Motif Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), e value threshold 1e−5; Pfam/TIGRfam using Hmmer v 3.1b2 (, and transmembrane domains with TMHMM 2.0c [87]. Genes from all six genomes were clustered into orthologous groups or larger gene families using MCL [88] with inflation parameter = 2.0. Perl scripts were developed to aggregate cluster annotations based on shared functional content of genes. Methods for prediction of lateral gene transfer, RBH pairs, phylogenetic analysis, and subcellular localization prediction are described in Additional file 1.



putative glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase


acetyl-CoA carboxylase


1-acyl-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase


Aquatic Species Program


artificial Seawater


1,3 β-glucan synthase


diacylglycerol acyltransferase


diacylglycerol acyltransferase type 2


Entner Doudoroff




enoyl-ACP reductase


fructose bisphosphate aldolase


fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase




glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase


glycerate 3-phosphate




glucose-6-phosphate isomerase


glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase


3-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydratase


3-ketoacyl-ACP reductase


3-ketoacyl-ACP synthase


lysocardiolipin acyltransferase 1


lysophospholipid acyltransferase


malonyl-CoA-ACP transacylase


malate dehydrogenase


malic enzyme


monoacylglycerol acyltransferase


nitrate reductase




phosphatidic acid phosphatase


pyruvate phosphate dikinase regulatory protein




phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase


phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase


phosphoenolpyruvate synthase




phosphoglycerate mutase


phosphoglycerate kinase




pyruvate kinase


periplastid compartment


pyruvate phosphate dikinase


pentose phosphate pathway


pyruvate carboxylase


reciprocal best BLAST hit


Stramenopile, Alveolata, Rhizaria supergroup




triose phosphate isomerase


UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase


UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase


Authors’ contributions

JCT, SDG, MM processed genomic material and assembled DNA and RNA libraries. SJC and DAL assembled the genome, methylomes, and performed genome annotation pipelines. MT, AJ, SP provided additional bioinformatics support. JCT, OC and MH performed further annotation of metabolic processes. OG performed genetic engineering experiments. SRS, JPM provided OrthoMCL and annotation data. EEA, AEA, SSM, MP, and MH provided financial support. JCT, SJC, DAL, SSM, MP, and MH conceived the study, oversaw the project and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


The authors would like to thank Dr. Roshan Shrestha for his advice and assistance on genetic manipulation experiments.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of supporting data

The dataset(s) supporting the results of this article are available in the Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4 and the UCSC Genome Browser [89]. Links to downloadable files including nuclear, mitochondrial, and chloroplast genomes, RepeatModeler, gene models, methylome, and RNAseq expression data can be found at the Downloads page of [90]. The assembly used for this study is cycCry0dot2 dated February 15, 2013.


Support for JCT, OG, OC, and MH was provided in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant FA9550-08-1-0178, Department of Energy Grants DE-SC0012556 and DE-EE0001222 and National Science Foundation Grant CBET-0903712. SJC was supported by the Broad Stem Cell Research Center. Support for DAL is from NIH Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and Interpretation T32HG002536. Support for SDG and SSM was provided to SSM by US Department of Energy Grant DE-FC02-02ER63421. MT was supported by P01 GM099134. Support for SP, and EEA was provided by US National Science Foundation (MCB-1149552). Support for SRS, JPM and AEA was provided to AEA by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF3828 and GBMF5006), the US Department of Energy (DE-SC0008593) and the National Science Foundation (OCE-1136477). MM was supported by the Whitcome Training grant. AJ was supported by R01 AI065617.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, USA
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, USA


  1. Georgianna DR, Mayfield SP. Exploiting diversity and synthetic biology for the production of algal biofuels. Nature. 2012;488:329–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chisti Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25:294–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14:217–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P. A look back at the US Department of Energy’s aquatic species program: biodiesel from algae. 1998. p. 328. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
  5. Slocombe SP, Zhang Q, Ross M, Anderson A, Thomas NJ, Lapresa Á, et al. Unlocking nature’s treasure-chest: screening for oleaginous algae. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Roessler PG. Effects of silicon deficiency on lipid composition and metabolism in the diatom Cyclotella cryptica. J Phycol. 1988;24:394–400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Reimann BEF, Lewin JMC, Guillard RRL. Cyclotella cryptica, a new brackish-water diatom species. Phycologia. 1963;3:75–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Huesemann MH, Hausmann TS, Bartha R, Aksoy M, Weissman JC, Benemann JR. Biomass productivities in wild type and pigment mutant of Cyclotella sp. (diatom). Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008;157:507–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Laws EA, Taguchi S, Hirata J, Pang L. Optimization of microalgal production in a shallow outdoor flume. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;32:140–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Roessler PG. Changes in the activities of various lipid and carbohydrate biosynthetic enzymes in the diatom Cyclotella cryptica in response to silicon deficiency. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988;267:521–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Roessler PG. UDP glucose pyrophosphorylase activity in the diatom Cyclotella cryptica. Pathway of chrysolaminarin biosynthesis. J Phycol. 1987;23:494–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunahay TG, Jarvis EE, Roessler PG. Genetic transformation of the diatoms Cyclotella cryptica and Navicula saprophila. J Phycol. 1995;31:1004–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shrestha RP, Hildebrand M. Evidence for a regulatory role of diatom silicon transporters in cellular silicon responses. Eukaryot Cell. 2014;14:29–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Trentacoste EM, Shrestha RP, Smith SR, Glé C, Hartmann AC, Hildebrand M, et al. Metabolic engineering of lipid catabolism increases microalgal lipid accumulation without compromising growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:19748–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nymark M, Sharma AK, Sparstad T, Bones AM, Winge P. A CRISPR/Cas9 system adapted for gene editing in marine algae. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24951.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Delalat B, Sheppard VC, Ghaemi SR, Rao S, Prestidge CA, McPhee G, et al. Targeted drug delivery using genetically engineered diatom biosilica. Nat Commun. 2015;6:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Daboussi F, Leduc S, Maréchal A, Dubois G, Guyot V, Perez-Michaut C, et al. Genome engineering empowers the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum for biotechnology. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3831.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Karas BJ, Diner RE, Lefebvre SC, McQuaid J, Phillips APR, Noddings CM, et al. Designer diatom episomes delivered by bacterial conjugation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6925.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis R, Aden A, Pienkos PT. Techno-economic analysis of autotrophic microalgae for fuel production. Appl Energy. 2011;88:3524–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cook O, Hildebrand M. Enhancing LC-PUFA production in Thalassiosira pseudonana by overexpressing the endogenous fatty acid elongase genes. J Appl Phycol. 2015;28:897–905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Manandhar-Shrestha K, Hildebrand M. Characterization and manipulation of a DGAT2 from the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: improved TAG accumulation without detriment to growth, and implications for chloroplast TAG accumulation. Algal Res. 2015;12:239–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kilian O, Kroth PG. Identification and characterization of a new conserved motif within the presequence of proteins targeted into complex diatom plastids. Plant J. 2005;41:175–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gruber A, Vugrinec S, Hempel F, Gould SB, Maier U-G, Kroth PG. Protein targeting into complex diatom plastids: functional characterisation of a specific targeting motif. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;64:519–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Moog D, Stork S, Zauner S, Maier U-G. In silico and in vivo investigations of proteins of a minimized eukaryotic cytoplasm. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:375–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Fuerstenberg SI, Tae H, Settlage RE, Boore JL, et al. Draft genome sequence and genetic transformation of the oleaginous alga Nannochloropsis gaditana. Nat Commun. 2012;3:686.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hildebrand M, Abbriano RM, Polle JE, Traller JC, Trentacoste EM, Smith SR, et al. Metabolic and cellular organization in evolutionarily diverse microalgae as related to biofuels production. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2013;17:506–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith SR, Abbriano RM, Hildebrand M. Comparative analysis of diatom genomes reveals substantial differences in the organization of carbon partitioning pathways. Algal Res. 2012;1:2–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bender SJ, Durkin CA, Berthiaume CT, Morales RL, Armbrust EV. Transcriptional responses of three model diatoms to nitrate limitation of growth. Front Mar Sci. 2014;1:1–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tanaka T, Maeda Y, Veluchamy A, Tanaka M, Abida H, Maréchal E, et al. Oil accumulation by the oleaginous diatom Fistulifera solaris as revealed by the genome and transcriptome. Plant Cell. 2015. doi:10.1105/tpc.114.135194.Google Scholar
  30. Armbrust EV, Berges JA, Bowler C, Green BR, Martinez D, Putnam NH, et al. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science. 2004;306:79–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bowler C, Allen AE, Badger JH, Grimwood J, Jabbari K, Kuo A, et al. The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature. 2008;456:239–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith SR, Glé C, Abbriano RM, Traller JC, Davis A, Trentacoste E, et al. Transcript level coordination of carbon pathways during silicon starvation-induced lipid accumulation in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. New Phytol. 2016;210:810–904.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hou Y, Lin S. Distinct gene number-genome size relationships for eukaryotes and non-eukaryotes: gene content estimation for dinoflagellate genomes. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6978.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Maumus F, Allen AE, Mhiri C, Hu H, Jabbari K, Vardi A, et al. Potential impact of stress activated retrotransposons on genome evolution in a marine diatom. BMC Genom. 2009;10:624.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Alverson AJ, Beszteri B, Julius ML, Theriot EC. The model marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana likely descended from a freshwater ancestor in the genus Cyclotella. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Alexander S, Sydow LM, Wessels D, Soll DR. Discoidin proteins of Dictyostelium are necessary for normal cytoskeletal organization and cellular morphology during aggregation. Differentiation. 1992;51:149–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Podell S, Gaasterland T. DarkHorse: a method for genome-wide prediction of horizontal gene transfer. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgante M, Brunner S, Pea G, Fengler K, Zuccolo A, Rafalski A. Gene duplication and exon shuffling by helitron-like transposons generate intraspecies diversity in maize. Nat Genet. 2005;37:997–1002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bennetzen JL, Wang H. The contributions of transposable elements to the structure, function, and evolution of plant genomes. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:505–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Veluchamy A, Lin X, Maumus F, Rivarola M, Bhavsar J, Creasy T, et al. Insights into the role of DNA methylation in diatoms by genome-wide profiling in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2091.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Traller JC, Hildebrand M. High throughput imaging to the diatom Cyclotella cryptica demonstrates substantial cell-to-cell variability in the rate and extent of triacylglycerol accumulation. Algal Res. 2013;2:244–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Umen JG. Chloroplast DNA methylation and inheritance in Chlamydomonas. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2585–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Lopez DA, Hamaji T, Kropat J, De Hoff P, Morselli M, Rubbi L, et al. Dynamic changes in the transcriptome and methylome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii throughout its life cycle. Plant Physiol. 2015. doi:10.1104/pp.15.00861.Google Scholar
  45. Huff JT, Zilberman D. Dnmt1-independent CG methylation contributes to nucleosome positioning in diverse eukaryotes. Cell. 2014;156:1286–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Feng S, Cokus SJ, Zhang X, Chen PY, Bostick M, Goll MG, et al. From the cover: conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:8689–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Rastogi A, Lin X, Lombard B, Loew D, Tirichine L. Probing the evolutionary history of epigenetic mechanisms: what can we learn from marine diatoms. Genetics. 2015;2:173–91.Google Scholar
  48. Kato M, Miura A, Bender J, Jacobsen SE, Kakutani T. Role of CG and non-CG methylation in immobilization of transposons in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2003;13:421–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Veluchamy A, Rastogi A, Lin X, Lombard B, Murik O, Thomas Y, et al. An integrative analysis of post-translational histone modifications in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Genome Biol. 2015;16:1–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Hockin NL, Mock T, Mulholland F, Kopriva S, Malin G. The response of diatom central carbon metabolism to nitrogen starvation is different from that of green algae and higher plants. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:299–312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Claquin P, Jézéquel VM, Kromkamp JC, Veldhuis M, Kraay G. Uncoupling of silicon compared with carbon and nitrogen metabolism and the role of the cell cycle in continuous cultures of Thalassiosira pseudonana (Bacillariophyceae) under light, nitrogen, and phosphorus control. J Phycol. 2002;38:922–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Hollister JD, Gaut BS. Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression. Genome Res. 2009;19:1419–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Kroth PG, Chiovitti A, Gruber A, Martin Jézéquel V, Mock T, Parker MS, et al. A model for carbohydrate metabolism in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum deduced from comparative whole genome analysis. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1426.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Dyrløv Bendtsen J, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004;340:783–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Small I, Peeters N, Legeai F, Lurin C. Predotar: a tool for rapidly screening proteomes for N-terminal targeting sequences. Proteomics. 2004;4:1581–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:953–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Gschloessl B, Guermeur Y, Cock JM. HECTAR: a method to predict subcellular targeting in heterokonts. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Gruber A, Rocap G, Kroth PG, Armbrust EV, Mock T. Plastid proteome prediction for diatoms and other algae with secondary plastids of the red lineage. Plant J. 2015;81:519–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Brown MS, Ye J, Rawson RB, Goldstein JL. Regulated intramembrane proteolysis. Cell. 2000;100:391–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Gong Y, Zhang J, Guo X, Wan X, Liang Z, Hu CJ, et al. Identification and characterization of PtDGAT2B, an acyltransferase of the DGAT2 acyl-coenzyme A: diacylglycerol acyltransferase family in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. FEBS Lett. 2013;587:481–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Chungjatupornchai W, Watcharawipas A. Diacylglycerol acyltransferase type 2 cDNA from the oleaginous microalga Neochloris oleoabundans: cloning and functional characterization. J Appl Phycol. 2014;27:1499–507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Chiovitti A, Molino P, Crawford SA, Teng R, Spurck T, Wetherbee R. The glucans extracted with warm water from diatoms are mainly derived from intracellular chrysolaminarin and not extracellular polysaccharides. Eur J Phycol. 2004;39:117–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Chauton MS, Winge P, Brembu T, Vadstein O, Bones AM. Gene regulation of carbon fixation, storage, and utilization in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum acclimated to light/dark cycles. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:1034–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Aluwihare LI, Repeta DJ, Pantoja S, Johnson CG. Two chemically distinct pools of organic nitrogen accumulate in the ocean. Science. 2005;308:1007–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruiz-Herrera J, Ruiz-Medrano R. Chitin biosynthesis in fungi. In: Arora DK, Bridge PD, Bhatnagar D, editors. Handbook of fungal biotechnology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2004. p. 315–30.Google Scholar
  66. Brunner E, Richthammer P, Ehrlich H, Paasch S, Simon P, Ueberlein S, et al. Chitin-based organic networks: an integral part of cell wall biosilica in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:9724–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Walsby AE, Xypolyta A. The form resistance of chitan fibres attached to the cells of Thalassiosira fluviatilis Hustedt. Br Phycol J. 1977;12:215–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Durkin CA, Mock T, Armbrust EV. Chitin in diatoms and its association with the cell wall. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8:1038–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Smucker RA. Chitin primary production. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1991;19:357–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruiz-Herrera J, González-Prieto JM, Ruiz-Medrano R. Evolution and phylogenetic relationships of chitin synthases from yeasts and fungi. FEMS Yeast Res. 2002;1:247–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Morozov AA, Likhoshway YV. Evolutionary history of the chitin synthases of eukaryotes. Glycobiology. 2016;26:635–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Hegedus D, Erlandson M, Gillott C, Toprak U. New insights into peritrophic matrix synthesis, architecture, and function. Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:285–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Davis AK, Palenik B. Characterization of a modular, cell-surface protein and identification of a new gene family in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Protist. 2008;159:195–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Moog D, Rensing SA, Archibald JM, Maier U-G, Ullrich KK. Localization and evolution of putative triose phosphate translocators in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7:2955–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Furumoto T, Yamaguchi T, Ohshima-Ichie Y, Nakamura M, Tsuchida-Iwata Y, Shimamura M, et al. A plastidial sodium-dependent pyruvate transporter. Nature. 2011;476:472–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Bricker DK, Taylor EB, Schell JC, Orsak T. A mitochondrial pyruvate carrier required for pyruvate uptake in yeast, Drosophila, and humans. Science. 2012;337:96–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Herzig S, Raemy E, Montessuit S, Veuthey JL. Identification and functional expression of the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier. Science. 2012;337:93–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Lewin JC, Lewin RA. Auxotrophy and heterotrophy in marine littoral diatoms. Can J Microbiol. 1960;6:127–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. White AW. Growth of two facultatively heterotrophic marine centric diatoms. J Phycol. 1974;10:292–300.Google Scholar
  80. Pahl SL, Lewis DM, Chen F, King KD. Growth dynamics and the proximate biochemical composition and fatty acid profile of the heterotrophically grown diatom Cyclotella cryptica. J Appl Phycol. 2009;22:165–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Pahl SL, Lewis DM, Chen F, King KD. Heterotrophic growth and nutritional aspects of the diatom Cyclotella cryptica (Bacillariophyceae): effect of some environmental factors. J Biosci Bioeng. 2010;109:235–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Perez-Garcia O, Escalante FME, de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y. Heterotrophic cultures of microalgae: metabolism and potential products. Water Res. 2011;45:11–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Zaslavskaia LA, Lippmeier JC, Shih C, Ehrhardt D, Grossman AR, Apt KE. Trophic conversion of an obligate photoautotrophic organism through metabolic engineering. Science. 2001;292:2073–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Kruckeberg AL. The hexose transporter family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Microbiol. 1996;166:283–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Poulsen N, Chesley PM, Kröger N. Molecular genetic manipulation of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol. 2006;42:1059–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Darley WM, Volcani BE. Role of silicon in diatom metabolism. Exp Cell Res. 1969;58:334–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1575–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. C. cryptica genome browser. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
  90. Cyclotella cryptica landing page. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
  91. Damste JSS. The rise of the rhizosolenid diatoms. Science. 2004;304:584–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2016