Skip to main content
Download PDF

A simple strategy to effectively produce d-lactate in crude glycerol-utilizing Escherichia coli

Biotechnology for Biofuels volume 12, Article number: 273 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Fed-batch fermentation has been conventionally implemented for the production of lactic acid with a high titer and high productivity. However, its operation needs a complicated control which increases the production cost.

Results

This issue was addressed by simplifying the production scheme. Escherichia coli was manipulated for its glycerol dissimilation and d-lactate synthesis pathways and then subjected to adaptive evolution under high crude glycerol. Batch fermentation in the two-stage mode was performed by controlling the dissolved oxygen (DO), and the evolved strain deprived of poxB enabled production of 100 g/L d-lactate with productivity of 1.85 g/L/h. To increase productivity, the producer strain was further evolved to improve its growth rate on crude glycerol. The fermentation was performed to undergo the aerobic growth with low substrate, followed by the anaerobic production with high substrate. Moreover, the intracellular redox of the strain was balanced by fulfillment of the anaerobic respiratory chain with nitrate reduction. Without controlling the DO, the microbial fermentation resulted in the homofermentative production of d-lactate (ca. 0.97 g/g) with a titer of 115 g/L and productivity of 3.29 g/L/h.

Conclusions

The proposed fermentation strategy achieves the highest yield based on crude glycerol and a comparable titer and productivity as compared to the approach by fed-batch fermentation. It holds a promise to sustain the continued development of the crude glycerol-based biorefinery.

Background

The concern over environmental pollutions caused by petrochemicals-derived materials has urged a pressing need for biopolymers. Recognized as an eco-friendly material, polylactide (PLA) made from d- or l-lactic acid is featured with biocompatibility and processability [1]. PLA naturally hydrolyzes to the non-toxic constituent of α-hydroxy acid, which renders it appealing for biomedical applications [2]. Moreover, PLA can be processed in a mold due to its thermoplastic nature. Products of molded PLA are proved to be non-hazardous by the United State Food and Drug Administration and applicable for food packaging [3]. In particular, the stereocomplex PLA composed of poly d- and l-lactic acid displays a superior performance in terms of thermal stability and mechanical strength [4]. It has a potential application in the electronic sector and the automobile industry [5].

In addition to the synthesis of PLA, lactic acids of enantiomerical purity are required for the application in the textile, food, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals industries [6]. The chemical synthesis of lactic acid lies in the use of petrochemical resources and produces a racemic mixture containing d- and l-lactic acid. In contrast, the fermentation process implementing a producer strain with the desired trait enables the production of an optically pure lactic acid. The demand for l-lactic acid in the food industry has been historically fulfilled by performing the fermentation process with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) [3]. LAB are a diverse group of natural producer and capable of producing lactic acid with a high yield and high productivity. The LAB-based fermentation is conducted mainly with the glucose-rich feedstock [7].

The current price of PLA is not competitive with that of the petroleum-based plastics. To lower the production cost, the producer strain has to grow on a cost-effective medium and synthesize lactic acids with a titer > 100 g/L, a conversion yield close to the theoretical value, an optical purity > 99%, and high productivity [8]. The efficiency of a lactic acid-based production scheme closely links to the producer strain, the culture substrate, and the operational mode [6]. The growth of LAB generally requires a supplement of complex nutrients. Therefore, many studies have investigated a potential of surrogate bacteria involving Bacillus sp. [9], Escherichia coli [10], and Corynebacterium glutamicum [11]. Reported results for these strains receiving the genetic modification are generally encouraging. The lactic acid fermentation has been commonly conducted with glucose. However, the replacement of glucose with a renewable substrate reduces the production cost. Fed-batch fermentation circumvents the problem of substrate inhibition and enhances the production titer. The feeding strategy by maintaining glucose at a certain level was illustrated as an effective method for the production of lactic acids [12]. Nevertheless, it requires more labors and equipments to operate.

Crude glycerol appears to be a renewable resource which attracts the industrial attentions [13]. It is a by-product in the waste stream resulting from the production process of biodiesel. Social problems associated with the intensive use of fossil fuels have increased a demand for biodiesel. The refinement of crude glycerol for the production of value-added chemicals provides an appealing way to fulfill circular economy in the biodiesel industry [14]. In view of immaturity of the industrial fermentation process for d-lactic acid, we previously worked on the crude glycerol-based production of d-lactic acid in E. coli. The producer strain was obtained by manipulating its metabolic pathways leading to d-lactic acid. By fed-batch fermentation, the engineered strain enabled high production of d-lactic acid (> 99% optical purity) [15]. In this study, our continued effort was made to simplify the operational mode. A simple strategy based on batch fermentation was developed for the effective production of d-lactate from crude glycerol.

Results and discussion

Development of producer strain

In our previous work, fed-batch fermentation of strain BLac-2106 was illustrated to effectively produce d-lactate using crude glycerol in terms of a high titer and high productivity [15]. In essence, this strain was deficient in adhE, frdA, pflB, and pta to curtail the carbon waste for the synthesis of byproducts including ethanol, formate, succinate, and acetate (Fig. 1). To enhance the synthesis of d-lactate, the strain was equipped with a genomic copy of the λPL promoter (PλPL)-driven d-ldh from Lactobacillus helveticus at pflCD. The strain was also deprived of dld and mgsA, which renders it unable to metabolize the enantiomerical purity of d-lactate. Although the fermentation result is encouraging, the fed-batch mode is complicated and unfriendly to operate. Therefore, this study was aimed to simplify the production scheme. As indicated in Fig. 1, the synthetic route leading to d-lactate from glycerol generally contains 3 module pathways participating in glycerol dissimilation, the supply of pyruvate precursor and energy, and the d-lactate synthesis. The dissimilation and synthesis pathways were reasoned to be limited. Therefore, strain BLac-2106 was further modified by genomic fusion of PλPL with endogenous gldA, dhaKLM, and ldhA. The latter encodes lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) responsible for the conversion of pyruvate into d-lactate [16]. The catalytic function of GldA and DhaKLM mediates the fermentative dissimilation of glycerol [17]. The modified strain displayed a 40% increase in the LDH. The expression level of gldA and of dhaKLM in the strain was elevated by 45% and 80%, respectively. The implementation of batch fermentation to achieve a high titer is challenging because of substrate inhibition. The modified strain was, thus, subjected to the adaptive evolution, and one resulting strain (designated EcoB-140) was scored for further characterization (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Metabolic pathways of interest leading to the synthesis of d-lactate from glycerol. The enhanced and blocked pathways were highlighted in blue (solid line) and red (dotted line), respectively. Genes and key metabolites involved in metabolic pathways include as follows: aceE-lpd, pyruvate dehydrogenase; adhE, aldehyde–alcohol dehydrogenase; dld, FAD-linked d-lactate dehydrogenase; dhaKLM, dihydroxyacetone kinase operon; frdABCD, fumarate reductase operon; ldhA, NAD-linked d-lactate dehydrogenase; D-ldh, L. helveticus d-lactate dehydrogenase; mgsA, methylglyoxal synthase; narGHJI, nitrate reductase operon; ndh, NADH dehydrogenase; poxB, pyruvate oxidase; gldA, glycerol dehydrogenase; glpD, glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; glpK, glycerol kinase; pflB, pyruvate-formate lyase; pflDC, putative pyruvate-formate lyase; pta, phosphate acetyltransferase; ACE acetate, CIT citrate, DHAP dihydroxyacetone phosphate, EtOH ethanol, FOM formate, α-KG α-ketoglutarate, D-LAC d-lactate, L-LAC l-lactate, OAA oxaloacetate, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, PYR pyruvate, SUC succinate, SCN-CoA succinyl-CoA, UQ ubiquinone

Full size image

Production of d-lactate by batch fermentation

Batch fermentation in the two-stage mode was conducted with strain EcoB-140 using crude glycerol (110 g/L). This was first performed with high aeration for rapid accumulation of cell biomass (i.e. the growth phase). Meanwhile, yeast extract (10 g/L) was supplemented to eliminate the lag growth of the strain. After the termination of bacterial growth at 12 h of the fermentation, the production phase was initiated simply by lowering the dissolved oxygen (DO) tension to 5% of the saturated level. At the end of the fermentation, the strain produced d-lactate of 70 g/L at the expense of 90 g/L crude glycerol (Fig. 2a). A large portion of d-lactate appeared in the production phase.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Production of d-lactate by batch fermentation. The engineered strain was cultured in a bench fermenter containing crude glycerol. The batch fermentation was under the control of the DO to proceed the aerobic growth phase and the fermentative production phase. The fermentation was initiated with the cell density at OD550 of 1. The absorbance measurement for the cell density in the production phase was interfered with crude glycerol and Ca(OH)2 and, therefore, not reported. The experiment was duplicated. The typical fermentation profiles were reported for strain EcoB-140 (a) and strain EcoB-140B (b). Cell density (black circle); crude glycerol (black up-pointing triangle); d-lactate (black square); acetate (X)

Full size image

It was unexpected to detect the production of acetate for the strain grown on a high concentration of glycerol (Fig. 2a). Our previous study illustrated the implementation of fed-batch fermentation for the production of d-lactate with negligible byproducts [15]. This was carried out by a stepwise feeding of glycerol to keep its level below 10 g/L during the fermentation process. Overall, acetate overflow likely correlates with the glycerol level. Pyruvate oxidase encoded by poxB in E. coli catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to acetate, and its expression level is induced in the presence of glycerol and in response to osmotic stress as well [18]. Accordingly, a high expression level of poxB could be realized in the strain exposed to a high concentration of glycerol. The absence of acetate in the glycerol-grown E. coli was due to the reutilization of acetate mediated by acs-encoded acetyl-CoA synthetase [18]. Acetate overflow occurring in strain EcoB-140 is likely the result of the synthesis rate exceeding the utilization rate. Accordingly, strain EcoB-140 was deprived of poxB to give strain EcoB-140B. Batch fermentation of the resulting strain was carried out with crude glycerol (120 g/L) and yeast extract (10 g/L). As shown in Fig. 2b, strain EcoB-140B consumed around 30 g/L glycerol in the first 12 h of the fermentation (i.e., the growth phase). In the production phase, d-lactate started to largely accumulate and reached around 100 g/L at 53 h of the fermentation. Acetate was not detected at the end of the fermentation.

Production of d-lactate by the two-dose fermentation

Crude glycerol drastically perturbs the physiological status of microbes [19]. It appears that the engineered strain is susceptible to the stress incurred by a high concentration of crude glycerol, which in turn retards the bacterial growth and decreases productivity. This issue may be addressed by the approach using a high cell density. Batch fermentation with two substrate doses (i.e., two-dose fermentation) was, thus, performed by growing the strain on a low dose of crude glycerol, followed by adding a high dose to the culture upon initiation of the production phase. The strain was first cultured with high aeration in the presence of crude glycerol (30 g/L) plus yeast extract (2 g/L). As shown in Fig. 3a, the strain almost consumed all glycerol at 9 h of the fermentation. Subsequently, crude glycerol of 70 g/L was added into the fermentation broth and the DO was controlled at around 5% of the saturated level. At 30 h of the fermentation, the strain consumed all glycerol and produced d-lactate of 92 g/L. The result indicates that this proposed strategy has a potential to improve the strain’s performance on crude glycerol in terms of productivity (from 1.85 to 3.1 g/L/h).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Production of d-lactate by the two-dose fermentation. The fermentation was conducted with the aerobic growth phase and the fermentative production phase. A high dose of crude glycerol was added to the culture broth at the end of the growth phase. The fermentation was initiated with the cell density at OD550 of 1. The absorbance measurement of the cell density in the production phase was interfered with crude glycerol and Ca(OH)2 and, therefore, not reported. The experiment was duplicated. The typical fermentation profiles were reported for the cases with the DO control (a) and without the DO control (b). Cell density (black circle); crude glycerol (black up-pointing triangle); d-lactate (black square); α-KG (white circle)

Full size image

Unexpectedly, the fermentation ended with the associated production of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) in the strain (Fig. 3a). The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle proceeds to the reductive pathway consisting of two terminal nodes at succinyl-CoA and α-KG in fermenting E. coli (Fig. 1) [20]. The lack of frdA (encoding fumarate reductase) conserves oxaloacetate (OAA) in strain EcoB-140B, which in turn favors the catalytic conversion of available OAA with acetyl-CoA to citrate. Citrate is further oxidized to α-KG. It is recognized that the low oxygen tension negates the functional activity of the TCA cycle [21]. In the absence of oxygen, E. coli relies on either nitrate reductase or fumarate reductase to reduce nitrate or fumarate which serves as the terminal electron acceptor in the respiratory chain [22]. Accordingly, the production phase was conducted under the low oxygen tension. To further simplify the operation, the fermentation was carried out without controlling the DO. The strain was cultured on crude glycerol (30 g/L) plus yeast extract (2 g/L) for 9 h with a high agitation at 500 rpm in the growth phase. In the second phase, crude glycerol (80 g/L) and NH4NO3 (20 mM) were added to the culture broth and the fermentation proceeded to the production of d-lactate with a low agitation at 200 rpm. It was found that the DO fluctuated below 1% of the saturated level. The strain consumed all glycerol and produced 105 g/L d-lactate at 38 h of the fermentation (Fig. 3b). α-KG was not detected at the end of the fermentation. Nitrate reductase is expressed in response to nitrate and fulfills its role in the respiratory chain of fermenting bacteria. As a result, it provides an electron sink to balance the intracellular redox level (Fig. 1). Note that NADH dehydrogenase encoded by ndh primarily functions in the nitrate respiration [23].

Effective production of d-lactate

The poxB-deficient strain indeed displayed a slower growth rate, in agreement with the growth defect of the mutant strain on glucose [24]. The PoxB-mediated reaction is coupled to the respiratory chain via ubiquinone and generates the proton motive force [25]. The strain without PoxB is likely in the shortage of energy. To improve its growth, strain EcoB-140B was evolved in the presence of 30 g/L crude glycerol without yeast extract. Finally, one strain (designated EcoB-170) displaying better growth was scored for investigation. The two-dose fermentation of strain EcoB-170 was carried out as described earlier except that the initial cell density (i.e., 0.2 at OD550) was reduced to one fifty of that used in Fig. 3b. As a result, the strain solely produced d-lactate with a titer of 105 g/L at 30 h of the fermentation (Fig. 4a). The performance of strain EcoB-170 was further investigated for its growth on a lower level of yeast extract (i.e., 1 g/L). The production phase was initiated with a higher substrate dose (i.e., 90 g/L). It consequently resulted in d-lactate of 115 g/L at 35 h of the fermentation (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effective production of d-lactate by the two-dose fermentation. Refer to Fig. 3 for the fermentation process. The fermentation was initiated with the cell density at OD550 of 0.2. The absorbance measurement of the cell density in the production phase was interfered with crude glycerol and Ca(OH)2 and, therefore, not reported. The experiment was duplicated. The typical fermentation profiles were reported for strain EcoB-170 (a) grown on 2 g/L yeast extract and fed with 80 g/L crude glycerol and (b) grown on 1 g/L yeast extract and fed with 90 g/L crude glycerol. Cell density (black circle); crude glycerol (black up-pointing triangle); d-lactate (black square)

Full size image

The fermentative production of d-lactate has been mostly conducted with glucose. There are few studies reporting the use of crude glycerol. In one report, E. coli strain B0013-070 was constructed with overexpression of ldhA and the deletion of ackA-pta, adhE, dld, frdA, pflB, poxB, and pps [26]. The fermentation was conducted with the aerobic phase at 34 °C, followed by the microaerobic phase at 40 °C. The DO was controlled below 1% of the saturated level and the glycerol level was maintained above 10 g/L during the microaerobic phase. As a result, the strain produced d-lactate of 100 g/L with the conversion yield and productivity reaching 0.75 g/g and 2.78 g/L/h, respectively (Table 1). Our previous work reported the development of strain BLac-2106 by genetic manipulation of the central metabolism, particularly the glycerol catabolism [15]. The production phase was proceeded to maintain the DO at 1% of the saturated level by adjusting the feeding dose of glycerol after the termination of the growth phase. The implementation of fed-batch fermentation enabled the engineered strain to produce d-lactate with a titer of 105 g/L, a yield of 0.75 g/g, and productivity of 2.78 g/L/h. Others with the emphasis on pure glycerol have been also reported. One study was conducted with the thiE-null strain B0013-080A which was unable to synthesize thiamine monophosphate [27]. The growth of strain B0013-080A was controlled by the availability of supplemented thiamine, and d-lactate was produced for the non-growing strain upon the depletion of thiamine. Fed-batch fermentation was carried out by dosing 4 batches of glycerol, and the strain produced d-lactate with a titer of 120 g/L, a yield of 0.87 g/g, and productivity of 4.11 g/L/h. Another work reported the isolation of E. coli strain AC-521 from soil samples. By keeping glycerol between 20 and 30 g/L, the fermentation of the strain in a fed-batch mode led to the production of lactic acid of 86 g/L at 40 °C [28]. The result accounts for a yield of 0.88 g/g and productivity of 0.97 g/L/h. In addition, Klebsiella pneumoniae was deprived of dhaT and yqhD to block the synthetic pathway of 1,3-propanediol [29]. Glycerol was continuously fed at a constant rate in the microaerobic phase. By fed-batch fermentation, the strain with the overexpression of ldhA enabled production of 142 g/L d-lactate with a yield of 0.82 g/g and productivity of 2.96 g/L/h. Nevertheless, the fermentation with K. pneumoniae requires the supplement of peptone and beef extract.

Table 1 d-Lactate production by microbes utilizing glycerol
Full size table

The complication of controlling the substrate level in a bioreactor makes fed-batch fermentation practically ineffective. Moreover, the operation usually needs sophisticated devices which increase the equipment investment. Batch fermentation apparently simplifies the production process without these drawbacks. However, the problem of substrate inhibition presents to be challenging. The brewing industry has implemented the very high gravity fermentation (VGHF) technology to remain profitable [30]. Ethanolic yeast is afflicted with the disorder in membrane fluidity and glucose metabolism under the hypertonic environment originating from VGHF [31]. The cellular utilization of glucose is retarded by the decreased expression of certain glycolytic enzymes [32]. A defect in membrane fluidity handicaps the solute transport systems of cells [33]. In contrast, a high level of crude glycerol induces the inhibitory effect on E. coli and the underlying mechanism may vary with the various compositions of crude glycerol. The producer strain was, thus, evolved in the hypertonic solution of crude glycerol. The supplement of yeast extract helped the cell growth in batch fermentation, whereas acetate overflow occurred for the evolved strain (Fig. 2a). This issue was addressed by deletion of poxB in the strain. The resulting strain enabled production of 100 g/L d-lactate with a yield of 0.95 g/g and productivity of 1.85 g/L/h (Table 1). To improve productivity, the strain was further evolved (i.e., strain EcoB-170) and was then employed for the two-dose fermentation. This process was first conducted with a light dose in the bioreactor to favor the aerobic growth. In the second stage, a heavy dose was added to speed up the anaerobic catabolism of glycerol. Note that this approach leads to a drastic reduction in yeast extract and initial cell density as applied for the microbial fermentation, which lowers the production cost. Consequently, strain EcoB-170 produced the optically pure d-lactate (> 99%) with a titer of 115 g/L, a yield of 0.97 g/g, and productivity of 3.29 g/L/h (Table 1). As previously illustrated, the bacterial growth was inhibited by peroxides (at μM) occurring in crude glycerol [34]. Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) was identified as the major compound contributing to the cytotoxicity. The effect of TBHP on strain EcoB-170 was then investigated by culturing the strain with 20 g/L pure glycerol plus TBHP ranging 60–90 μM. Consequently, the cell growth remained unaffected. Another study reported that the lactic acid–iron complex mediated the generation of the reactive hydroxyl radical (HO.) from peroxides [35]. Taken together, strain EcoB-170 is likely evolved to tolerate the induced oxidative stress. Nevertheless, the impurities of crude glycerol vary with various feedstock origins. There is need for further investigation of the detailed mechanism which underlines the resistance of the strain to crude glycerol.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study proposed a simple fermentation technology. This fermentation strategy can be easily operated without the DO control. The result of this approach achieves the highest yield based on glycerol and a comparable titer and productivity as compared to those by fed-batch fermentation (Table 1). This proposed technology holds a promise to sustain the continued development of the crude glycerol-based biorefinery.

Methods

Strain construction and adaptive evolution

To enhance the expression level, endogenous gldA, dhaKLM, or ldhA was fused with PλPL. This construction work essentially followed the reported protocol. In brief, the LE*-gen-RE*-PλPL cassette flanked by two homologous extensions was amplified from plasmid pPL-Gn by PCR with Gld1–Gld2 or Dha1–Dha2 primers [15]. By the act of λ Red, the genomic locus was targeted by recombination with the electroporated PCR DNA in the host strain. The integrant strain was scored after removal of the inserted marker (i.e., gen) using Cre [36]. To delete poxB, the truncated gene was amplified from strain JW2121-1 (△poxB::FRT-kan-FRT) by PCR with the primers (cgctgaaggttacgtactgg and tagtcctgcagagcattaacg). The λ Red-mediated recombination resulted in the integration of the PCR DNA into the genome of the strain, and the kan marker flanked by FRT was removed using Flp [37].

Crude glycerol was provided by Great Green Technology (Changhua, Taiwan). Adaptive evolution of the strain was carried out by a serial of cell subculture with the increasing level of crude glycerol. In general, the to-be-evolved strain was cultured in the Erlenmeyer flask (125 mL) containing NBS medium (20 mL) plus the indicated amount of crude glycerol with or without yeast extract. The bacterial culture was incubated at 37 °C with vigorous shaking for 24 h, and the cell density was measured turbidimetrically at 550 nm (OD550). Cell subculture was prepared by transferring the adapted culture to a flask containing the fresh medium. The cell subculture was repeated as needed.

Bacterial fermentation

Batch fermentation was performed as follows. The overnight culture was routinely prepared with a flask containing Luria–Bertani (LB) medium [38]. The experiment was conducted by inoculating the overnight culture into flasks containing 100 mL NBS medium [15] with 20 g/L crude glycerol. The seeding culture was incubated at 37 °C with vigorous shaking for 12 h. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and inoculated into a bioreactor (New Brunswick Bioflow 110) containing 1-L NBS medium plus crude glycerol and yeast extract as indicated. The initial cell density was maintained at OD550 of 1 or 0.2. The operation condition was set up as follows unless stated otherwise. In the growth phase, the DO of the fermentation broth was maintained at 30% of the saturated level by purging air at 1 vvm and the automatic control of the agitation rate. In the production phase, the DO was controlled at 3% of the saturated level throughout the fermentation. Alternatively, crude glycerol (80–90 g/L) was added into the culture broth and the fermentation was performed without controlling the DO. The fermentation was conducted at 37 °C and the broth pH was maintained at 7 using 20% (w/v) Ca(OH)2.

Enzyme assay

The enzyme activity of lactate dehydrogenase was determined based on the previous report [15]. The cell-free extract was prepared and added to the reaction solution consisting of 1-mM pyruvate, 0.053-mM NADH, and 100-mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The reaction was carried out at 25 °C and the absorbance at 340 nm was measured along the time course. The enzyme activity was calculated according to the reduction in the NADH level in μmol per min.

Following the reported protocol [15], the expression level of gldA and dhaK was quantified by calculation of the individual mRNA level normalized to that of ihfB. In brief, total RNAs of the strain were isolated by Ambion® RiboPure (Life technology, USA) and used to synthesize the corresponding cDNAs with High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Life technology), the Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix and Power SYBR® Green RT-PCR Reagent kit. The real-time PCR analysis was carried out using the Applied Biosystems® StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Life technology).

Fermentation analysis

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography AS3000 (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used for the fermentation analysis. Glycerol was determined with the ICSep ICE-ION-300 column (Transgenomic, USA) and a RI detector. Organic acids were measured with the ICSep ICE-ORH-801 column (Transgenomic, USA) and a UV detector set at 210 nm. The mobile phase consisting of 0.0085 N H2SO4 was used for the analysis. Analysis methods essentially followed the previous report [15].

Availability of supporting data

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

α-KG:

α-ketoglutarate

DO:

dissolved oxygen

LAB:

lactic acid bacteria

LDH:

lactate dehydrogenase

PλPL :

λPL promoter

LB:

Luria–Bertani

OAA:

oxaloacetate

PLA:

polylactide

TCA:

tricarboxylic acid

TBHP:

tert-butyl hydroperoxide

VGHF:

very high gravity fermentation

References

  1. Qi X, Ren Y, Wang X. New advances in the biodegradation of Poly(lactic) acid. Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 2017;117:215–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Farah S, Anderson DG, Langer R. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications—a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:367–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wee YJ, Kim JN, Ryu HW. Biotechnological production of lactic acid and its recent applications. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2006;44:163–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikada Y, Jamshidi K, Tsuji H, Hyon SH. Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric poly(lactides). Macromolecules. 1987;20:904–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garlotta D. A literature review of poly(lactic acid). J Polym Environ. 2001;9:63–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdel-Rahmana MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K. Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:877–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hofvendahl K, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microbiol Technol. 2000;26:87–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Litchfield JH. Lactic acid, microbially produced. In: Schaechter MO, editor. Encyclopedia of microbiology. Oxford: Academic Press; 2009. p. 362–72.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Assavasirijinda N, Ge D, Yu B, Xue Y, Ma Y. Efficient fermentative production of polymer-grade d-lactate by an engineered alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. strain under non-sterile conditions. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou L, Niu DD, Tian KM, Chen XZ, Prior BA, Shen W, Shi GY, Singh S, Wang ZX. Genetically switched d-lactate production in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2012;14:560–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsuge Y, Yamamoto S, Kato N, Suda M, Vertès AA, Yukawa H, Inui M. Overexpression of the phosphofructokinase encoding gene is crucial for achieving high production of d-lactate in Corynebacterium glutamicum under oxygen deprivation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:4679–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Klotz S, Kaufmann N, Kuenz A, Prüße U. Biotechnological production of enantiomerically pure d-lactic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:9423–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. da Silva GP, Mack M, Contiero J. Glycerol: a promising and abundant carbon source for industrial microbiology. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:30–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang F, Hanna MA, Sun R. Value-added uses for crude glycerol—a byproduct of biodiesel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang ZW, Saini M, Lin LJ, Chiang CJ, Chao YP. Systematic engineering of Escherichia coli for d-lactate production from crude glycerol. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:9583–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tarmy EM, Kaplan NO. Kinetics of Escherichia coli B d-lactate dehydrogenase and evidence for pyruvate-controlled change in conformation. J Biol Chem. 1968;243:2587–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Durnin G, Clomburg J, Yeates Z, Alvarez PJ, Zygourakis K, Campbell P, Gonzalez R. Understanding and harnessing the microaerobic metabolism of glycerol in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:148–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Martínez-Gómez K, Flores N, Castañeda HM, Martínez-Batallar G, Hernández-Chávez G, Ramírez OT, Gosset G, Encarnación S, Bolivar F. New insights into Escherichia coli metabolism: carbon scavenging, acetate metabolism and carbon recycling responses during growth on glycerol. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chatzifragkou A, Papanikolaou S. Effect of impurities in biodiesel-derived waste glycerol on the performance and feasibility of biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95:13–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Spiro S, Guest JR. Adaptive responses to oxygen limitation in Escherichia coli. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991;16:310–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim BH, Gadd GM. Bacterial physiology and metabolism. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Gennis RB, Stewart V. Respiration. In: Neidhardt FC, Curtiss III R, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella, cellular and molecular biology. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1996. p. 217–61.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tran QH, Bongaerts J, Vlad D, Unden G. Requirement for the proton-pumping NADH dehydrogenase I of Escherichia coli in respiration of NADH to fumarate and its bioenergetic implications. Eur J Biochem. 1997;244:155–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdel-Hamid AM, Attwood MM, Guest JR. Pyruvate oxidase contributes to the aerobic growth efficiency of Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 2001;147:1483–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mather MW, Gennis RB. Kinetic studies of the lipid-activated pyruvate oxidase flavoprotein of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:16148–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen XZ, Tian KM, Niu DD, Shen W, Algasan G, Singh S, Wang ZX. Efficient bioconversion of crude glycerol from biodiesel to optically pure d-lactate by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Green Chem. 2014;16:342–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tian K, Niu D, Liu X, Prior BA, Zhou L, Lu F, Singh S, Wang Z. Limitation of thiamine pyrophosphate supply to growing Escherichia coli switches metabolism to efficient d-lactate formation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:182–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hong AA, Cheng KK, Peng F, Zhou S, Sun Y, Liu CM, Liu DH. Strain isolation and optimization of process parameters for bioconversion of glycerol to lactic acid. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2009;84:1576–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Feng X, Ding Y, Xian M, Xu X, Zhang R, Zhao G. Production of optically pure d-lactate from glycerol by engineered Klebsiella pneumoniae strain. Bioresour Technol. 2014;172:269–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Puligundla P, Smogrovicova D, Obulam VSR, Ko S. Very high gravity (VHG) ethanolic brewing and fermentation: a research update. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38:1133–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas K, Ingledew WJ. Production of 21% (v/v) ethanol by fermentation of very high gravity (VHG) wheat mashes. J Ind Microbiol. 1992;10:61–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossi FG, Ribeiro MZ, Converti A, Vitolo M, Pessoa A. Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity and synthesis. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2003;32:107–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Magdouli S, Saffar T, Guedri T, Tarek R, Brar SK, Blais JF. Practical aspects and case studies of industrial scale fermentation. In: Brar SK, Das PK, Sarma SJ, editors. Microbial sensing in fermentation. Wiley-Blackwell: New Jersey; 2018. p. 267–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Nguyen ADQ, Kim YG, Kim SB, Kim CJ. Improved tolerance of recombinant Escherichia coli to the toxicity of crude glycerol by overexpressing trehalose biosynthetic genes (otsBA) for the production of β-carotene. Bioresour Technol. 2013;143:531–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bruno-Barcena JM, Azcarate-Peril MA, Hassan HM. Role of antioxidant enzymes in bacterial resistance to organic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2747–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chiang CJ, Saini M, Lee HM, Wang ZW, Lin LJ, Chao YP. Genomic engineering of Escherichia coli by the phage attachment site-based integration system with mutant loxP sites. Proc Biochem. 2012;17:2246–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chiang CJ, Chen PT, Chao YP. Replicon-free and markerless methods for genomic insertion of DNAs in phage attachment sites and controlled expression of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;101:985–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Miller JH. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We like to acknowledge Dr. Wang ZW for the technical support.

Funding

This work is supported by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 105-2221-E-035-085-MY3), Taiwan, and China Medical University (CMU105-S-50).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Feng Chia University, 100 Wenhwa Road, Taichung, 40724, Taiwan

    Yao-De Wang, Jin-Yi Liao & Yun-Peng Chao

  2. Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan

    Chung-Jen Chiang

  3. Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan

    Yun-Peng Chao

  4. Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, 41354, Taiwan

    Yun-Peng Chao

Authors
  1. Yao-De Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jin-Yi Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chung-Jen Chiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yun-Peng Chao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YDW constructed bacterial strains and performed fermentation; JYL performed fermentation; CJC and YPC assisted in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chung-Jen Chiang or Yun-Peng Chao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to submit the work to the journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The time course of the E. coli strain undergoing adaptive evolution.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, YD., Liao, JY., Chiang, CJ. et al. A simple strategy to effectively produce d-lactate in crude glycerol-utilizing Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Biofuels 12, 273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1615-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1615-4

Keywords

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

ISSN: 2731-3654

Contact us