Skip to main content

Process optimization for mass production of 2,3-butanediol by Bacillus subtilis CS13

Abstract

Background

Bacillus subtilis CS13 was previously isolated for 2,3-butanediol (2,3-BD) and poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) co-production. When culturing this strain without L-glutamic acid in the medium, 2,3-BD is the main metabolic product. 2,3-BD is an important substance and fuel with applications in the chemical, food, and pharmaceutical industries. However, the yield and productivity for the B. subtilis strain should be improved for more efficient production of 2,3-BD.

Results

The medium composition, which contained 281.1 g/L sucrose, 21.9 g/L ammonium citrate, and 3.6 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, was optimized by response surface methodology for 2,3-BD production using B. subtilis CS13. The maximum amount of 2,3-BD (125.5 ± 3.1 g/L) was obtained from the optimized medium after 96 h. The highest concentration and productivity of 2,3-BD were achieved simultaneously at an agitation speed of 500 rpm and aeration rate of 2 L/min in the batch cultures. A total of 132.4 ± 4.4 g/L 2,3-BD was obtained with a productivity of 2.45 ± 0.08 g/L/h and yield of 0.45 g2,3-BD/gsucrose by fed-batch fermentation. The meso-2,3-BD/2,3-BD ratio of the 2,3-BD produced by B. subtilis CS13 was 92.1%. Furthermore, 89.6 ± 2.8 g/L 2,3-BD with a productivity of 2.13 ± 0.07 g/L/h and yield of 0.42 g2,3-BD/gsugar was achieved using molasses as a carbon source.

Conclusions

The production of 2,3-BD by B. subtilis CS13 showed a higher concentration, productivity, and yield compared to the reported generally recognized as safe 2,3-BD producers. These results suggest that B. subtilis CS13 is a promising strain for industrial-scale production of 2,3-BD.

Background

In the past, many bulk chemicals could only be produced by petroleum refining or other chemical processes. Now, however, the production of bulk chemicals by microbial fermentation has been extensively studied. 2,3-butanediol (2,3-BD) production by microbial fermentation is one example. 2,3-BD is mainly used in the food, pharmaceutical, polymers, and cosmetics industries [1,2]. Such as 2,3-BD can be easily converted to 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PD), which can then be used as a monomer and synthesis polytrimethylene terephthalate [3]. Due to its low freezing point, 2,3-BD can be used as an antifreeze agent [4]. Additionally, 2,3-BD is an excellent fuel with a heat value of 27,198 J/g [1]. At present, 2,3-BD is primarily produced by microbial fermentation using renewable energy sources as raw materials, the greatest advantage of which is their environmentally friendly nature. The bacterial species that produce 2,3-BD include Klebsiella, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Serratia [5,6,7,8]. Thus far, K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca are considered to be the most promising microorganisms for the production of 2,3-BD due to their high yield and productivity. However, Klebsiella spp. are pathogenic microorganisms, which limit their potential for use in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, the use of non-pathogenic bacteria for industrial production of 2,3-BD is of great significance.

Bacillus subtilis, a generally recognized as safe strain, offers numerous benefits in terms of safety. In B. subtilis, carbon sources are hydrolyzed and synthesized into pyruvate by glycolysis. Acetoin as a precursor of 2,3-BD is catalyzed by acetolactate synthase and acetolactate decarboxylase, then reduced to 2,3-BD by 2,3-BD dehydrogenase (BDH). B. subtilis can produce mixtures of meso-2,3-BD (R,S-2,3-BD) and D-2,3-BD (2R,3R-2,3-BD) with different ratios according to fermentation conditions. Thus, some research has focused on the production of chiral pure meso-2,3-BD and chiral pure D-2,3-BD using metabolic engineering methods [9, 10]. The yield of 2,3-BD is a determining factor for B. subtilis use in industrial applications. The previous study found that oxygen supply favors the high-level production of 2,3-BD [11]. Besides, the type of substrate and concentration, nitrogen source, and inorganic salts also significantly affect the 2,3-BD formation [11,12,13,14]. Recently, genetic engineering methods have been widely used to reduce the synthesis of byproducts and increase 2,3-BD production [15, 16]. Furthermore, isolation of high 2,3-BD-producing strains and optimization of fermentation medium and culture conditions are indispensable methods [14, 17].

B. subtilis CS13 was previously isolated in our laboratory for the co-production of 2,3-BD and poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) [18]. In this study, the fermentation medium for 2,3-BD production was optimized using response surface methodology (RSM). Batch cultures were employed to investigate the best fermentation conditions. Moreover, fed-batch fermentation was carried out to further increase 2,3-BD concentrations using sucrose and untreated molasses as the respective sole carbon sources. To our knowledge, B. subtilis CS13 demonstrated a higher titer, yield, and productivity of 2,3-BD compared to existing reports.

Methods

Microorganisms and medium

B. subtilis CS13 was used for 2,3-BD fermentation. The strain has been deposited into the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) with the accession number KCTC 14094 BP.

The basal medium contained 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl, and 20 g/L sucrose. The fermentation medium (pH 6.5) was composed of 250–350 g/L sucrose, 10–30 g/L ammonium citrate, 1 g/L KH2PO4, 1–5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.04 g/L FeCl3·6H2O, 0.15 g/L CaCl2·2H2O, 0.12 g/L MnCl2·4H2O, and 0.5 g/L NaCl.

Culture conditions

A loopful of B. subtilis CS13 from a basal medium agar plate was transferred into a 50-mL tube containing 15-mL fresh basal medium and grown at 37 ℃ with shaking at 200 rpm for 24 h. The pre-culture was then inoculated (1% v/v) into 250-mL flasks containing 50-mL fermentation medium (initial pH 6.5) according to the RSM design. After culturing for 24 h at 37 ℃ with shaking at 200 rpm, 0.5 g sterilized CaCO3 was added to each flask to neutralize the acids and maintain a neutral pH.

For bioreactor fermentation, the pre-culture was inoculated (1% v/v) into 500-mL flasks containing 100-mL basal medium, cultured for 12 h, and then transferred to a 3-L fermenter (FMT-ST-D03; Bio System Engineering & Machine Company, Cheongju, Korea) containing 0.9-L optimized fermentation medium with an initial 100 g/L sucrose. The agitation speed and aeration rate were maintained at 400–600 rpm and 1–2 L/min, respectively. For fed-batch culture, the agitation speed and aeration rate were maintained at 500 rpm and 2 L/min, respectively. Bottles of sucrose were added when the total sugar concentration dropped below 20 g/L. The pH was automatically controlled at 6.5 ± 0.1 by adding 2 M NaOH. An initial 100 g untreated molasses, which was purchased from Byeoli Science Co., Ltd. (Jeonju, South Korea) and contained 31.56% (w/w) sucrose, 7.84% (w/w) glucose, and 8.58% (w/w) fructose, was added to the fermenter instead of sucrose. Approximately 150 g molasses was added to the bioreactor when the total sugar concentration fell under 20 g/L.

RSM experimental design

Previous research has found that sucrose, ammonium citrate, and MgSO4·7H2O exert significant effects on 2,3-BD production [18]. In this study, the face-centered central composite design (FCCD) was employed to optimize the three most significant variables for further enhancing 2,3-BD production. The independent variables and their coded levels were studied at three different levels (−1, 0, and + 1), including the real value of each level, and a set of 20 experiments was carried out as shown in Table 1. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and response surfaces were carried out using Design Expert 10.0.6 software (Stat-Ease Corporation, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to investigate the effects of various factors on 2,3-BD production. The yield of 2,3-BD was fitted with the following second-degree polynomial equation:

$$ {\text{Y}} = \beta_{0} + \sum {\beta_{i} X_{i} + } \sum {\beta_{ij} X_{i} X_{j} + } \sum {\beta_{ii} X_{i}^{2} } , $$
Table 1 Coded levels and real values of the three variables and responses in the FCCD experiment

where Y is the predicted 2,3-BD concentration (response), β0 is the intercept term, βi is the linear coefficient, βij is the quadratic coefficient, βii is the squared term, and Xi and Xj are independent variables.

Analysis methods

The absorbance of the fermentation broth was determined at 600 nm using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Libra S70PC; Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, England). The cell biomass was calculated using a calibration curve between the optical density at 600 nm and dry cell weight [19].

The concentrations of 2,3-BD and acetoin were determined using an Agilent 1100 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and a refractive index detector. The concentrations of sucrose, glucose, and fructose in the broth were measured using the Aminex HPX-87P column (300 × 7.8 mm; Bio-Rad). The mobile phase consisted of 5 mM H2SO4 and HPLC-grade water with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min, and the column temperature was controlled at 65 ℃.

Results and discussion

RSM design for 2,3-BD production

The significant independent variables (sucrose, ammonium citrate, and MgSO4·7H2O) for 2,3-BD production were optimized using the FCCD, and the yields of 2,3-BD as the response are listed in Table 1. A wide range of 2,3-BD titers from 83.0 to 124.8 g/L were observed across the 20 experiments. In this model, a P-value < 0.05 was used to indicate significant variables. The results showed that sucrose (X1), ammonium citrate (X2), MgSO4·7H2O (X3), their squared terms (X12, X22, and X32), and the quadratic terms of sucrose and ammonium citrate (X1X2) had significant effects on 2,3-BD production (P < 0.05) (Table 2). The second-order polynomial equation for calculating 2,3-BD production (Y) using coded variables was as follows:

$$ {\text{ Y}} = 121.46 - 11.35 \, X_{1} + 5.58 \, X_{2} + 4.58 \, X_{3} + 2.23 \, X_{1} X_{2} - 14.26X_{1}^{2} - 9.82X_{2}^{2} - 5.51X_{3}^{2}.$$
Table 2 Statistical analysis of the FCCD for 2,3-BD production by B. subtilis CS13

The coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9881) indicated that 98.81% of the variability in the response could be explained by the model. The “Predicted R2” of 0.9054 was in reasonable agreement with the “Adjusted R2” of 0.9774. The “Lack of Fit F value” of 1.47 implied that the “Lack of Fit” was not significant relative to the pure error (Table 2). Thus, this model was deemed reliable for analyzing 2,3-BD production.

The effect of these three variables on 2,3-BD production and their optimal levels were further analyzed by RSM. The three-dimensional response surface curves are presented in Fig. 1. The response surface was convex, suggesting the existence of an optimal value for each variable. Each variable value above the optimum value would not be conducive to the production of 2,3-BD. This result was consistent with the negative coefficient estimate of the squared terms. According to the second-order polynomial equation model and response surface analysis, the predicted maximum value of 2,3-BD was 125.0 g/L when the concentrations of sucrose, ammonium citrate, and MgSO4·7H2O were 281.1, 21.9, and 3.6 g/L, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure1

Response surface graphs of 2,3-BD production by B. subtilis CS13. a Effect of ammonium citrate and sucrose. b Effect of MgSO4·7H2O and sucrose. c Effect of MgSO4·7H2O and ammonium citrate

RSM was used to find an appropriate medium for 2,3-BD production using B. subtilis CS13. As the fermentation time progressed, the maximum value of 2,3-BD in each group of experiments (Table 1) was taken as the response value. However, the reduction in productivity due to substrate inhibition could not be reflected. Therefore, some studies have optimized substrates by setting different sugar concentration gradients before RSM design [17, 20]. In this study, a high concentration of sucrose (250–350 g/L) was used, and significant substrate inhibition occurred at sucrose concentrations above 300 g/L (Table 1).

Ammonium citrate is a significant factor that influences 2,3-BD accumulation in the medium as shown in Table 2 (P < 0.0001). B. subtilis CS13 production of 2,3-BD requires oxidation of NADH to NAD+ [9]. In addition, as a γ-PGA producer, citrate enhances citric acid metabolism, while NH4+ enhances glutamate metabolism conversion of NADPH to NADP+, which subsequently increases NADH accumulation and promotes 2,3-BD synthesis [18, 21]. It is reported that the yield of 2,3-BD can be increased by addition of different organic acid, and ammonium citrate acts as an intermediate metabolite to promote the formation of 2,3-BD [14, 22]. Previous research has also confirmed the significant effects of ammonium citrate for 2,3-BD production in B. amyloliquefaciens B10-127 [14]. It is known that α-acetolactate synthase is a key enzyme for 2,3-BD formation, and this enzyme is dependent on Mg2+ [23].

Validation of the optimized medium for 2,3-BD production

To confirm the reliability of the polynomial equation for predicting 2,3-BD production, a validation experiment was performed in triplicate at the optimal conditions. As shown in Fig. 2, the highest titer of 2,3-BD (125.5 ± 3.1 g/L) was obtained at 96 h, which was very close to the predicted value (120 g/L). Therefore, the optimized medium was good for 2,3-BD production, and the optimal medium composition consisted of 281.1 g/L sucrose, 21.9 g/L ammonium citrate, 1 g/L KH2PO4, 3.6 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.04 g/L FeCl3·6H2O, 0.15 g/L CaCl2·2H2O, 0.12 g/L MnCl2·4H2O, and 0.5 g/L NaCl.

Fig. 2
figure2

Time course of 2,3-BD production by B. subtilis CS13 in the optimized medium

Batch fermentation for 2,3-BD production

The effects of agitation speed (400, 500, and 600 rpm) and aeration rate (1 and 2 L/min) on 2,3-BD production in batch fermentation with the optimal medium at an initial sucrose concentration (100 g/L) were investigated. The highest biomass (7.7 ± 0.3 g/L) was obtained at 500 rpm–1 L/min after 21 h (Fig. 3a). The growth of B. subtilis CS13 was low in the agitation speed of 400 rpm, thereby limiting the absorption of the substrate (Fig. 3b). Under other conditions, cell growth and substrate absorption did not show significant differences (Fig. 3a, b). At a high agitation speed (600 rpm) and high aeration (2 L/min), the biomass slightly decreased after 15 h. This result suggests that both a shortage of oxygen and high dissolved oxygen affect the growth of the strain.

Fig. 3
figure3

Effects of agitation speed and aeration rate on a biomass, b sugar consumption, c 2,3-BD, d meso-2,3-BD, e D-2,3-BD, and f acetate production in the batch fermentation

The highest titer of 2,3-BD (49.8 ± 1.7 g/L) with the highest productivity (2.49 ± 0.08 g/L/h) was produced under the conditions of 500 rpm–2 L/min. Upon further increasing the agitation speed to 600 rpm at 2 L/min, the final 2,3-BD concentration did not increase (49.0 ± 1.5 g/L) (Fig. 3c). When the aeration was kept at 1 L/min while increasing the agitation speed from 400 to 600 rpm, the titer of 2,3-BD increased from 33.3 ± 1.1 to 47.8 ± 1.5 g/L, and the productivity increased from 1.39 ± 0.05 to 1.99 ± 0.06 g/L/h (Fig. 3c). In addition, meso-2,3-BD increased from 9.8 ± 0.3 to 27.5 ± 0.9 g/L (Fig. 3d). Therefore, the concentration of 2,3-BD can be increased by proper dissolved oxygen, and aeration appears to greatly influence the configuration of 2,3-BD. The titers of meso-2,3-BD (45.01 ± 1.3 and 44.0 ± 1.1 g/L) were obtained under the aeration rate of 2 L/min at 500 and 600 rpm conditions, respectively, and meso-2,3-BD accounted for 90% of the total 2,3-BD (Fig. 3d). D-2,3-BD is more likely to be synthesized under a low aeration rate (1 L/min) (Fig. 3e). These results indicate that high concentration and high productivity of 2,3-BD can be achieved simultaneously at a speed of 500 rpm and aeration rate of 2 L/min.

It is known that agitation speed and aeration rate affect dissolved oxygen during the fermentation process. One study found that low oxygen is advantageous for 2,3-BD production using B. subtilis but hampers cell growth and substrate absorption, whereas high dissolved oxygen promotes the production of acetoin [9]. However, in this work, the 2,3-BD yield increased from 0.38 to 0.43 g2,3-BD/gsucrose as the agitation speed increased from 400 to 600 rpm at an aeration rate of 1 L/min. The highest yield of 0.48 g2,3-BD/gsucrose was obtained under the conditions of 500 rpm–2 L/min. Therefore, a suitable oxygen supply is beneficial to 2,3-BD production by B. subtilis CS13. Interestingly, acetoin was not detected during the batch fermentation process. During the B. subtilis growth phases, high consumption rates of NADH and NAD+ were observed, resulting in an NADH/NAD+ ratio that was lower intracellularly; thus, acetoin to the 2,3-BD pathway is enhanced to regenerate the excess reducing power [6]. Zhang et al. [24] reported that a high yield of acetoin was formed at the decline phase of fermentation. Oxygen supply affects the configuration of 2,3-BD, and low dissolved oxygen is beneficial for D-2,3-BD synthesis [25]. In the current work, the lower the dissolved oxygen value, the more D-2,3-BD was formed (Fig. 3e). At the aeration rate of 1 L/min, the concentration of D-2,3-BD slightly decreased at 400 rpm compared to 500 rpm, likely due to the shortage of oxygen that limited the consumption of sugars. During fermentation with the higher agitation speeds (500 and 600 rpm) and aeration rate (2 L/min), the purity of meso-2,3-BD increased to 90.5%, suggesting that a moderate increase in oxygen supply may also increase the purity of meso-2,3-BD produced using B. subtilis CS13. More interestingly, at higher dissolved oxygen conditions, the D-2,3-BD concentration displayed a decrease after a certain value. This phenomenon is the first of its kind to be reported and may have been caused by the NADH/NAD+ ratio in the cells [25].

The earlier studies found that supplementation with acetate enhanced the 2,3-BD production [26, 27]. Acetate can induce α-acetolactate synthase (α-ALS), α-acetolactate decarboxylase (α-ALD), diaceyl (acetoin) reductase (DAR), and butanediol dehydrogenase (BDH), which enhanced the pathway of 2,3-BD and reduces the acetoin to 2,3-BD. Also, acetate acts as an inhibitor for the oxidation of 2,3-BD to acetoin [28]. As shown in Fig. 3f, the highest titer of 4.0 ± 0.1 g/L acetate was obtained at 500 rpm–2 L/min. Although the agitation speed of 500 rpm was higher than previous reports [9, 10, 13], the yield of 2,3-BD did not decrease. The production of 2,3-BD at a relatively high agitation speed is the first report, the increase in the yield of 2,3-BD might be due to the formation of acetate. Future studies will be conducted in the gene and metabolic regulation.

Fed-batch production of 2,3-BD from sucrose

To eliminate the effect of substrate inhibition, fed-batch cultivation with a low initial sucrose concentration (100 g/L) in the optimized medium was further studied to increase 2,3-BD productivity and support the effectiveness of industrial production. From Fig. 4, we concluded that the biomass increased to 8.5 ± 0.3 g/L at 36 h and then slowly decreased. 2,3-BD production reached a maximum value of 132.4 ± 4.4 g/L at 54 h with a productivity of 2.45 ± 0.08 g/L/h and yield of 0.45 g2,3-BD/gsucrose. The highest titer of meso-2,3-BD reached 121.9 ± 3.8 g/L, whereas the concentration of D-2,3-BD changed considerably during fermentation until finally stabilizing at 13.5 ± 0.7 g/L.

Fig. 4
figure4

source by B. subtilis CS13

Time course of fed-batch fermentation of 2,3-BD using sucrose as the carbon

In this study, fed-batch fermentation for the production of 2,3-BD by various bacterial species was demonstrated (Table 3). The highest 2,3-BD titer was achieved by K. pneumoniae SDM with the highest productivity of 4.21 g/L/h [29]. However, K. pneumoniae is a pathogenic microorganism, which poses a risk in industrial applications. When BDH and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were co-overproduced in B. amyloliquefaciens, the 2,3-BD concentration improved from 112.3 to 132.9 g/L [6]. B. licheniformis DSM 8785 produced 144.7 g/L 2,3-BD over 127 h of fed-batch fermentation [30] with a productivity of only 1.14 g/L/h. Other strains, such as K. oxytoca GSC 12206 and E. aerogenes KCTC 2190, displayed high productivity but relatively low concentrations of 2,3-BD [31, 32]. For comparison, the maximum 2,3-BD concentration obtained from B. subtilis CS13 was 132.4 g/L with a productivity of 2.45 g/L/h. To our knowledge, this is the highest 2,3-BD production level reported for B. subtilis. A high 2,3-BD titer makes downstream processing much easier, and the high productivity of B. subtilis CS13 reduces the fermentation time. Therefore, we consider B. subtilis CS13 to be a very promising strain for large-scale production of 2,3-BD in industrial contexts.

Table 3 Production of 2,3-BD by various microorganisms

In the fed-batch fermentation process of B. subtilis CS13, acetoin as the main by-product appeared after 30 h and continued to increase over time. After 54 h, the 2,3-BD concentration decreased, while the acetoin concentration increased from 4.4 ± 0.1 to 8.6 ± 0.2 g/L, indicating that the ratio of NADH/NAD+ had changed, and 2,3-BD was converted to acetoin in the final phase of fermentation [13]. On the other hand, the concentration of acetate increased to 4.5 ± 0.2 g/L at 36 h and then decreased to 2.2 ± 0.1 g/L by the end of fermentation (Fig. 4). The reduced inhibition of acetate might be promoted the production of acetoin. The concentration of 2,3-BD reached its highest level, and the ratio of meso-2,3-BD/2,3-BD was 92.1% at 54 h. The stereoisomers of 2,3-BD are microorganism dependent. P. polymyxa produced D-2,3-BD as the major product [33], while K. pneumonia and B. subtilis produced meso-2,3-BD as the major product [3, 10] and B. licheniformis produced a mixture of D-2,3-BD and meso-2,3-BD at a ratio of nearly 1:1 [17]. Thus, the key enzymes for 2,3-BD isomer formation are different among the various 2,3-BD producers. In B. subtilis CS13, meso-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase (meso-BDH) appears to show greater activity toward meso-2,3-BD than D-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase (D-BDH) does toward D-2,3-BD formation. Meso-2,3-BD is an important platform chemical with numerous special applications, such as used for microbial production of 2-butanol and butanone [34, 35], as well as producing renewable polyesters and enantiomerically pure halohydrins [36, 37]. The high ratio of meso-2,3-BD/2,3-BD will simplify the purification process and improve commercial viability.

Fed-batch production of 2,3-BD from untreated molasses

Finally, we tested the feasibility of using untreated molasses as a low-cost carbon source in the fed-batch production of 2,3-BD by B. subtilis CS13. Under the conditions of 500 rpm–2 L/min, all of the sugar was consumed at 42 h, and 89.6 ± 2.8 g/L 2,3-BD was obtained with a productivity of 2.13 ± 0.07 g/L/h (Fig. 5). After fermentation, the broth volume increased due to the addition of a large amount of untreated molasses, which had the potential to decrease the concentration of 2,3-BD. In reality, a total of 693.6 ± 10.5 g untreated molasses containing 332.8 ± 5.2 g sugar was consumed, producing 140.2 ± 3.1 g 2,3-BD at a yield of 0.42 g2,3-BD/gsugar after 42 h. The increase in the volume of the fermentation broth also reduced the dissolved oxygen, and the final meso-2,3-BD and D-2,3-BD titers were 56.1 ± 1.7 and 33.5 ± 1.1 g/L, respectively. The low dissolved oxygen was of significance to acetoin accumulation [38], and the yield of acetoin increased to 9.3 ± 0.3 g/L after 42 h with acetate yield of 4.4 ± 0.2 g/L. Furthermore, the maximum biomass of 9.5 ± 0.4 g/L was obtained at 30 h (Fig. 5), which proved to be better than using sucrose (8.5 ± 0.3 g/L) as the carbon source. Some reports have suggested that untreated molasses contains some unknown essential nutrients, such as crude protein and vitamins, that may stimulate cell growth [39]. After 30 h, the biomass began to decrease gradually, potentially caused by the high concentration of molasses containing metal ions and ash that exceeded the strain tolerance limit, which could be toxic for cells [40]. Related to this, the 2,3-BD productivity decreased to 1.45 ± 0.04 g/L/h compared to the first 30 h of 2.40 ± 0.07 g/L/h.

Fig. 5
figure5

source by B. subtilis CS13

Time course of fed-batch fermentation of 2,3-BD using untreated molasses as the carbon

Using molasses as a substrate to produce 2,3-BD has been previously reported [30, 31]. E. cloacae produced a high concentration of 2,3-BD (90.8 g/L) with a productivity of 1.51 g/L/h and yield of 0.39 g2,3-BD/gmolasses [41]. B. subtilis TUL322 produced 75.73 g/L 2,3-BD with a productivity of 0.66 g/L/h by feeding glucose into the molasses-based medium [42]. Interestingly, lower concentrations of 2,3-BD (78.9 g/L and 76.2 g/L) were produced by K. pneumonia SDM and K. pneumonia ATCC200721 by feeding corncob molasses and sugarcane molasses, respectively [16, 43]. Compared to previous research, B. subtilis CS13 appears to utilize untreated molasses more efficiently for the production of 2,3-BD, demonstrating a higher titer, productivity, and yield in the present study.

Conclusions

In this study, a high titer of 2,3-BD from sucrose was obtained by B. subtilis CS13 using optimized medium. The concentration and configuration of 2,3-BD as well as the synthesis of acetoin were significantly affected by the agitation speed and aeration rate in the batch fermentation process. In fed-batch fermentation, a maximum 2,3-BD concentration of 132.4 ± 4.4 g/L with a productivity of 2.45 ± 0.08 g/L/h and yield of 0.45 g2,3-BD/gsucrose was obtained. This strain produced meso-2,3-BD and D-2,3-BD at a ratio of 92.1:7.9. Furthermore, a high concentration, productivity, and yield of 2,3-BD were able to be achieved using untreated molasses as the carbon source. Therefore, B. subtilis CS13 constitutes a promising 2,3-BD producer using a low-cost medium on an industrial scale.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

2,3-BD:

2,3-Butanediol

B. subtilis :

Bacillus subtilis

RSM:

Response surface methodology

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

FCCD:

Face-centered central composite design

BDH:

2,3-Butanediol dehydrogenase

D-BDH:

D-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase

meso-BDH:

Meso-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase

References

  1. 1.

    Syu MJ. Biological production of 2,3-butanediol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;55:10–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA. The ‘buttery’ attribute of wine-diacetyl-desirability, spoilage and beyond. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;96:235–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ji XJ, Huang H, Ouyang PK. Microbial 2,3-butanediol production: A state-of-the-art review. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29:351–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Soltys KA, Batta AK, Koneru B. Successful nonfreezing, subzero preservation of rat liver with 2,3-butanediol and type I antifreeze protein. J Surg Res. 2015;96:30–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Guo XW, Cao CH, Wang YZ, Li CQ, Wu MY, Chen YF, Zhang CY, Pei HD, Xiao DG. Effect of the inactivation of lactate dehydrogenase, ethanol dehydrogenase, and phosphotransacetylase on 2,3-butanediol production in Klebsiella pneumoniae strain. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yang TW, Rao ZM, Zhang X, Xu MJ, Xu ZH, Yang ST. Effects of corn steep liquor on production of 2,3-butanediol and acetoin by Bacillus subtilis. Process Biochem. 2013;48:1610–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liu QY, Liu YD, Kang ZQ, Xiao D, Gao C, Xu P, Ma CQ. 2,3-Butanediol catabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:3927–40.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhang LY, Yang YL, Sun JA, Shen YL, Wei DZ, Zhu JW, Chu J. Microbial production of 2,3-butanediol by a mutagenized strain of Serratia marcescens H30. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1961–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fu J, Huo GX, Feng LL, Mao YF, Wang ZW, Ma HW, Chen T, Zhao XM. Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for chiral pure meso-2,3-butanediol production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fu J, Wang ZW, Chen T, Liu WX, Shi T, Wang GL, Tang YJ, Zhao XM. NADH plays the vital role for chiral pure D-(−)-2,3-butanediol production in Bacillus subtilis under limited oxygen conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111:2126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Celinska E, Grajek W. Biotechnological production of 2, 3-butanediol—current state and prospects. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:715–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yan PF, Feng J, Dong S, Wang M, Khan IA, Wang Y. Production of high levels of chirally pure D-2,3-butanediol with a newly isolated Bacillus strain. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2017;5:11016–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bao T, Hang X, Zhao XJ, Rao ZM, Yang TW, Yang ST. Regulation of the NADH pool and NADH/NADPH ratio redistributes acetoin and 2,3-butanediol proportion in Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:1298–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yang TW, Zhang X, Rao ZM, Gu SH, Xia HF, Xu ZH. Optimization and scale-up of 2,3-butanediol production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B10–127. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:1563–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu D, Chen Y, Ding FY, Guo T, Xie JJ, Zhuang W, Niu HQ, Shi XC, Zhu CJ, Ying HJ. Simultaneous production of butanol and acetoin by metabolically engineered Clostridium acetobutylicum. Metab Eng. 2015;27:107–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lee SM, Oh BR, Park JM, Yu AN, Heo SY, Hong WK, Seo JW, Kim CH. Optimized production of 2,3-butanediol by a lactate dehydrogenase-deficient mutant of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2013;18:1210–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li LX, Zhang LJ, Li K, Wang Y, Gao C, Han BB, Ma CQ, Xu P. A newly isolated Bacillus licheniformis strain thermophilically produces 2,3-butanediol, a platform and fuel bio-chemical. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:123.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang DX, Kim HM, Lee SB, Kim DH, Joe MH. Simultaneous production of poly-γ-glutamic acid and 2,3-butanediol by a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis CS13. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:7005–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang DX, Hwang JS, Kim DH, Lee SB, Kim DH, Joe MH. A newly isolated Bacillus siamensis SB1001 for mass production of poly-γ-glutamic acid. Process Biochem. 2020;92:164–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chan S, Jantama SS, Kanchanatawee S, Jantama K. Process optimization on micro-aeration supply for high production yield of 2,3-butanediol from maltodextrin by metabolically-engineered Klebsiella oxytoca. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0161503.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Meng YH, Dong GR, Zhang C, Ren YY, Qu YL, Chen WF. Calcium regulates glutamate dehydrogenase and poly-γ-glutamic acid synthesis in Bacillus natto. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:673–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Anvari M, Safari Motlagh MR. Enhancement of 2, 3-butanediol production by Klebsiella oxytoca PTCC 1402. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;636170:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Poulsen C, Stougaard P. Purification and properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetolactate synthase from recombinant Escherichia coli. Eur J Bioch. 1989;185:433–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhang X, Yang TW, Lin Q, Xu MJ, Xia HF, Xu ZH, Li HZ, Rao ZM. Isolation and identification of an acetoin high production bacterium that can reverse transform 2,3-butanediol to acetoin at the decline phase of fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27:2785–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dai JJ, Cheng JS, Liang YQ, Jiang T, Yuan YJ. Regulation of extracellular oxidoreduction potential enhanced (R, R)-2,3-butanediol production by Paenibacillus polymyxa CJX518. Bioresour Technol. 2014;167:433–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nakashimada Y, Marwoto B, Kashiwamura T, Kakizono T, Nishio N. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production by addition of acetic acid in Paenibacillus polymyxa. J Biosci Bioeng. 2000;90:661–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yu EK, Saddler JN. Enhanced production of 2,3-butanediol by Klebsiella pneumoniae grown on high sugar concentrations in the presence of acetic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44:777–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bryn K, Ulstrup JC, Stormer FC. Effect of acetate upon the formation of acetoin in Klebsiella and Enterobacter and its possible practical application in a rapid Voges-Proskauer test. Appl Microbiol. 1973;25:511–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ma CQ, Wang AL, Qin JY, Li LX, Ai XL, Jian TY, Tang HZ, Xu P. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production by Klebsiella pneumoniae SDM. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;82:49–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jurchescu IM, Hamann J, Zhou XY, Ortmann T, Kuenz A, Prüße U, Lang S. Enhanced 2,3-butanediol production in fed-batch cultures of free and immobilized Bacillus licheniformis DSM 8785. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:6715–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kim DK, Rathnasingh C, Song HH, Lee HJ, Seung DY, Chang YK. Metabolic engineering of a novel Klebsiella oxytoca strain for enhanced 2,3-butanediol production. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;116:186–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jung MY, Ng CY, Song H, Lee JW, Oh MK. Deletion of lactate dehydrogenase in Enterobacter aerogenes to enhance 2,3-butanediol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95:461–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xie NZ, Li JX, Song LF, Hou JF, Guo L, Du QS, Yu B, Huang RB. Genome sequence of type strain Paenibacillus polymyxa DSM 365, a highly efficient producer of optically active (R, R)-2,3-butanediol. J Biotechnol. 2015;195:72–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ghiaci P, Norbeck J, Larsson C. 2-Butanol and butanone production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through combination of a B12 dependent dehydratase and a secondary alcohol dehydrogenase using a TEV-based expression system. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e102774.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ghiaci P, Lameiras F, Norbeck J, Larsson C. Production of 2-butanol through meso-2,3-butanediol consumption in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;360:70–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gubbels E, Jasinska-Walc L, Koning CE. Synthesis and characterization of novel renewable polyesters based on 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid and 2,3-butanediol. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem. 2013;51:890–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Liu R, Berglund P, Högberg H-E. Preparation of the four stereoisomers of 3-bromo-2-butanol or their acetates via lipase-catalysed resolutions of the racemates derived from dl- or meso-2,3-butanediol. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 2005;16:2607–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tian YJ, Fan YX, Liu JJ, Zhao XY, Chen W. Effect of nitrogen, carbon sources and agitation speed on acetoin production of Bacillus subtilis SF4-3. Electron J Biotechnol. 2016;19:41–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhang D, Feng XH, Zhou Z, Zhang Y, Xu H. Economical production of poly(gamma-glutamic acid) using untreated cane molasses and monosodium glutamate waste liquor by Bacillus subtilis NX-2. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:583–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Xia J, Xu ZX, Xu H, Liang JF, Li S, Feng XH. Economical production of poly(ε-L-lysine) and poly(L-diaminopropionic acid) using cane molasses and hydrolysate of streptomyces cells by Streptomyces albulus PD-1. Bioresour Technol. 2014;164:241–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dai JY, Zhao P, Cheng XL, Xiu ZL. Enhanced production of 2,3-butanediol from sugarcane molasses. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;175:3014–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Białkowska AM, Jędrzejczak-Krzepkowska M, Gromek E, Krysiak J, Sikora B, Kalinowska H, Kubik C, Schütt F, Turkiewicz M. Effects of genetic modifications and fermentation conditions on 2,3- butanediol production by alkaliphilic Bacillus subtilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;10:2663–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wang AL, Wang Y, Jiang TY, Li LX, Ma CQ, Xu P. Production of 2,3-butanediol from corncob molasses a waste by-product in xylitol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:965–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kallbach M, Horn S, Kuenz A, Prüße U. Screening of novel bacteria for the 2,3-butanediol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:1025–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kim SJ, Hahn JS. Efficient production of 2,3-butanediol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by eliminating ethanol and glycerol production and redox rebalancing. Metab Eng. 2015;31:94–101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ishii J, Morita K, Ida K, Kato H, Kinoshita S, Hataya S, Shimizu H, Kondo A, Matsuda F. A pyruvate carbon flux tugging strategy for increasing 2,3-butanediol production and reducing ethanol subgeneration in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:180.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ji XJ, Huang H, Zhu JG, Ren LJ, Nie ZK, Du J, Li S. Engineering Klebsiella oxytoca for efficient 2, 3-butanediol production through insertional inactivation of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase gene. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:1751–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This project was supported by the Nuclear R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DXW performed the experiments. DXW and MHJ designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. BRO, SBL, DHK, and MHJ designed and guided the study, and edited the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Ho Joe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Oh, BR., Lee, S. et al. Process optimization for mass production of 2,3-butanediol by Bacillus subtilis CS13. Biotechnol Biofuels 14, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01859-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • 2,3-butanediol
  • B. subtilis CS13
  • Response surface methodology
  • Fermentation