Research
Open Access

Identification of novel metabolic interactions controlling carbon flux from xylose to ethanol in natural and recombinant yeasts

  • Gert Trausinger1, 2,
  • Christoph Gruber1,
  • Stefan Krahulec1,
  • Christoph Magnes2,
  • Bernd Nidetzky1 and
  • Mario Klimacek1Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels20158:157

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0340-x

©  Trausinger et al. 2015

Received: 23 June 2015

Accepted: 9 September 2015

Published: 25 September 2015

Abstract

Background

Unlike xylose-converting natural yeasts, recombinant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the same xylose assimilation pathway produce under anaerobic conditions xylitol rather than ethanol from xylose at low specific xylose conversion rates. Despite intense research efforts over the last two decades, differences in these phenotypes cannot be explained by current metabolic and kinetic models. To improve our understanding how metabolic flux of xylose carbon to ethanol is controlled, we developed a novel kinetic model based on enzyme mechanisms and applied quantitative metabolite profiling together with enzyme activity analysis to study xylose-to-ethanol metabolisms of Candida tenuis CBS4435 (q xylose = 0.10 g/gdc/h, 25 °C; Y ethanol = 0.44 g/g; Y xylitol = 0.09 g/g) and the recombinant S. cerevisiae strain BP000 (q xylose = 0.07 g/gdc/h, 30 °C; Y ethanol = 0.24 g/g; Y xylitol = 0.43 g/g), both expressing the same xylose reductase (XR), comprehensively.

Results

Results from strain-to-strain metabolic control analysis indicated that activity levels of XR and the maximal flux capacity of the upper glycolysis (UG; both ≥ tenfold higher in CBS4435) contributed predominantly to phenotype differentiation while reactions from the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway played minor roles. Intracellular metabolite profiles supported results obtained from kinetic modeling and indicated a positive correlation between pool sizes of UG metabolites and carbon flux through the UG. For CBS4435, fast carbon flux through the UG could be associated with an allosteric control of 6-phosphofructokinase (PFK) activity by fructose 6-phosphate. The ability of CBS4435 to keep UG metabolites at high levels could be explained by low glycerol 3-phosphate phosphatase (GPP, 17-fold lower in CBS4435) and high XR activities.

Conclusions

By applying a systems biology approach in which we combined results obtained from metabolic control analysis based on kinetic modeling with data obtained from quantitative metabolite profiling and enzyme activity analyses, we could provide new insights into metabolic and kinetic interactions contributing to the control of carbon flux from xylose to ethanol. Supported by evidences presented two new targets, PFK and GPP, could be identified that aside from XR play pivotal roles in phenotype differentiation. Design of efficient and fast microbial ethanol producers in the future can certainly benefit from results presented in this study.

Keywords

Bioethanol Xylose fermentation Candida tenuis CBS4435 BP000 Kinetic modeling Metabolic control analysis Metabolite profiling

Background

Xylose assimilation (XA) represents one of the most intensively studied pathway-engineering problems over the last two decades, with the aim to develop recombinant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are capable of converting xylose, the second most abundant sugar aside from glucose in lignocellulosic materials, efficiently to ethanol. Engineering efforts pursued in the past focused on two routes, namely the bacteria-type and the yeast-type XA pathway [1–7]. Unlike bacteria and some fungi which directly convert xylose to xylulose catalyzed by xylose isomerase, xylose-utilizing yeasts perform this isomerization in two consecutive steps, via xylitol, catalyzed by an NAD(P)H-dependent xylose reductase (XR) and an NAD+-specific xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) (Fig. 1). Resultant xylulose is converted into xylulose 5-P (X5P) by an ATP-dependent xylulokinase (XK) and X5P is further metabolized via reactions of the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway and glycolysis to ethanol.
Fig. 1

Xylose assimilation pathways addressed by metabolic engineering of S. cerevisiae. XR, XDH, XK and XI denote xylose reductase, xylitol dehydrogenase, xylulokinase and xylose isomerase, respectively

In the past construction of stable S. cerevisiae, constructs that were able to ferment xylose to ethanol were typically based on chromosomal integration of genes encoding for wild-type forms of XR and XDH (frequently from Scheffersomyces stipitis) together with an XK gene and with each gene under the control of a constitutive promoter. However, compared to their natural source strains which express the same XA pathway, these strain constructs display lower xylose conversion rates (q xylose) and produce xylitol (Y xylitol = 0.29–0.59 g/g (gram xylitol formed per gram xylose utilized); 0.0–0.1 g/g for S. stipitis) rather than ethanol (Y ethanol ~ 0.25 g/g; ~0.40 g/g for S. stipitis) [8–10]. Opposite metabolic phenotypes should be a direct consequence of different flux control because recombinant and natural yeasts use the same reaction network to convert xylose to ethanol. Various hypotheses about possible targets which exert control on Y xylitol and q xylose are discussed in the literature. Formation of large amounts of xylitol by recombinant S. cerevisiae strains was associated with unbalanced coenzyme usage between XR and XDH [7, 11]. Low q xylose was attributed to limiting enzyme activity levels of the XA pathway [12, 13], the PP pathway [14] or xylose uptake [15]. Steady-state kinetic modeling supported by experimental data was used to suggest that a low activity ratio for XR-to-XDH combined with a moderately expressed XK could be essential in keeping Y xylitol low [12, 16, 17]. Selective overexpression of XR from S. stipitis (SsXR) resulted in low Y xylitol and fast xylose conversion but had no effect on Y ethanol, while glycerol [due to dihydroxyacetone-P (DHAP) reduction activity of SsXR] and acetate were formed instead [13]. Furthermore, it was recognized that increasing cellular availability of NADH for XR by altering redox metabolism decreases Y xylitol and q xylose while increasing cytosolic NADPH availability leads to faster xylose conversion but also enhanced Y xylitol [18, 19]. In contrast to these observations, natural xylose-converting yeasts manage to balance coenzyme usage between XR and XDH and ferment xylose efficiently, despite a XR-to-XDH activity ratio of >1 [9].

With the aim to improve our understanding of how kinetic interactions between XA pathway enzymes and reactions of the central carbon metabolism control Y xylitol and q xylose, we developed an enzyme-mechanism-based kinetic model and analyzed kinetic control schemes of xylose fermentations of the xylose-converting yeast Candida tenuis CBS4435 and of its recombinant counterpart, S. cerevisiae BP000; we recorded profiles of intracellular metabolites and specific enzyme activities to corroborate results obtained from in silico analyses. Finally, we used the obtained kinetic model of BP000 to predict effects on Y xylitol and q xylose due to selective modifications in the metabolic network.

Both strains used in our study express a yeast-type XA pathway that involves the same XR (CtXR), an NAD+-specific XDH and an XK. Construction, physiological and metabolomic characterization of BP000 have been reported recently [20, 21]. Under anaerobic conditions, BP000 converts 40 % of xylose carbon to xylitol and 24 % to ethanol. The physiology of CBS4435 when growing on xylose has previously been analyzed under aerobic conditions [22] and was assessed for the first time under anaerobic conditions in our study.

Results

Xylose fermentations

Fermentations for CBS4435 and BP000 were carried out in a stirred bioreactor under anaerobic conditions at controlled pH and temperature. For CBS4435, representative time courses of substrate utilization and product formation are shown in Fig. 2a. Physiological parameters obtained for CBS4435 and BP000 are summarized in Table 1. Results obtained for BP000 in this study were in excellent agreement with those reported recently [21]. Similar to BP000, CBS4435 did not grow under these conditions. In contrast to BP000, CBS4435 was able to convert xylose to ethanol at very high yields of 0.44 g/g. Only small amounts of xylitol (0.09 g/g) and glycerol (0.04 g/g) were formed in addition. The q xylose for CBS4435 recorded at 25 °C was 1.5-fold higher than that measured for BP000 at 30 °C. Consequently, about 2.5 times more ethanol was formed per gdc and hour by CBS4435.
Fig. 2

Representative substrate and product time courses of xylose-to-ethanol fermentation obtained for CBS4435 in a bioreactor under anaerobic conditions (a) and representative results from parameter estimation analysis (b). a Full circles xylose, empty circles xylitol, empty triangles ethanol, full squares CO2 (g/L CO2 produced), full triangles glycerol. b Full (empty) symbols indicate xylose (xylitol) concentrations. Fermentations were carried out with CBS4435 (circles) and BP000 [this study: biomass loading: 0.9 gdc/L, 18 g/L xylose (triangles down), 3.8 gdc/L, 18 g/L xylose (triangles up) and data from Ref. [20]: 12 g/L xylose and 1.6 gdc/L (squares)]. Solid lines indicate best fits obtained from parameter estimation analysis

Table 1

Summary of product yields and specific xylose conversion rates obtained for BP000 and C. tenuis CBS4435

 

BP000

CBS4435

Cell loading (gdc/L)

0.9

1.1

q xylose (g/gdc/h)

0.07 ± 0.01

0.10 ± 0.01

 

Yield (g/g)

Yield (g/g)

Xylitol

0.43 ± 0.01

0.09 ± 0.01

Glycerol

0.05 ± 0.01

0.04 ± 0.02

Ethanol

0.24 ± 0.01

0.44 ± 0.02

CO2

0.27 ± 0.03

0.42 ± 0.04

Acetate

0.04 ± 0.01

n.d.

Mass balance

1.03 ± 0.04

0.99 ± 0.05

n.d. Not detectable

Physiological parameters were further verified by flux balance analysis carried out under experimentally obtained boundary conditions. Resultant flux maps are shown in Fig. 3a, b, respectively. In CBS4435, CtXR reduced 88 % of xylose with NADH while only 65 % was converted by NADH in BP000. In BP000, the ~threefold higher NADPH usage of CtXR compared to CBS4435 was met to 75 % by a 2.2-fold larger flux through the oxidative pentose phosphate (oPP) pathway relative to q xylose and to 25 % by the production of acetate. In BP000, 26 % of xylose carbon entering glycolysis at the F6P node were shuttled through the oPP pathway while in CBS4435 only 9 % entered the same pathway.
Fig. 3

Metabolic flux maps of xylose-to-ethanol fermentation for CBS4435 (a) and BP000 (b) together with a collection of specific enzyme activities (c) and intracellular metabolites (d) obtained for CBS4435 (hatched boxes) and BP000 (grey boxes). a, b External metabolites are underlined. Relative fluxes normalized to q xylose (0.67 mmol/gdc/h for CBS4435 and of 0.47 mmol/gdc/h for BP000) are shown. ATP and CO2 formation were used individually as objective function; resultant fluxes were averaged and presented together with their standard deviations. c Specific enzyme activities determined at 25 °C are shown in µmol/min/mgprotein. d Intracellular metabolites are shown in µmol/gdc. EC energy charge

Analysis of enzyme activities

Specific activities of XR, XDH, XK, G6PDH, GND, PGI, GPP, ALDH, ADH, FBA, PYK and PFK were determined from cell-free extracts of BP000 and CBS4435 (Fig. 3c, Additional file 1: Table S1). Largest differences were observed for specific activity levels of GPP (17-fold higher in BP000), CtXR (ninefold higher in CBS4435) and PYK (sevenfold higher in BP000), while the remaining enzyme activities were either approx. twofold higher in CBS4435 (XDH, XK, GND and FBA), very similar for both strains (PGI, G6PDH, ADH) or only measureable in one strain (NADP+-dependent ALDH and PFK). No activities were observed for NAD+-dependent ALDH in either strain. Lack of ALDH activity supported the observed phenotype of CBS4435 which did not form acetate under the conditions investigated. In case of PFK, we were not able to prepare cell-free extracts for CBS4435 containing active forms.

As a consequence of the ninefold higher specific activity level of CtXR, the XR-to-XDH activity ratio was normal for CBS4435 (1.8) but low for BP000 (0.4). The XR-to-XK activity ratios were low for CBS4435 (~0.5) and BP000 (~0.1).

Intracellular metabolite profiling

Intracellular metabolites from the glycolysis, PP pathway as well as energy metabolites were quantitatively analyzed for BP000 and CBS4435 metabolizing xylose at the pseudo-steady state of conversion (Fig. 3d). For both strains, the physiological state, “metabolizing”, was reflected by an energy charge of ~0.7 [21]. F1, 6BP (21 ± 6-fold), Glyc3P (20 ± 3-fold), HXP (5 ± 1-fold) and DHAP (4 ± 1-fold) were the only intracellular metabolites that showed substantially different levels and were higher in CBS4435 relative to BP000.

In silico analyses

To establish the basis for metabolic control analysis (MCA), time courses of xylose utilization and xylitol production recorded for BP000 (18 g/L xylose and 0.9gdc/L) and CBS4435 (18 g/L and 1.1 gdc/L) were simultaneously fitted four times by parameter estimation analysis by applying the reaction network shown in Fig. 4 as well as rate equations and kinetic parameters collected in the Additional file 1: Table S2 and Table 2, respectively. Resultant best fits (Fig. 2b) showed excellent correlation to experimental data obtained for BP000 (R 2 for q xylose and Y xylitol were >0.9993 and >0.998, respectively) and CBS4435 (R 2 for q xylose and Y xylitol were >0.9996 and >0.9991, respectively). Averages and standard deviations obtained for estimated V max values are listed in the Additional file 1: Table S3. Enzyme activity levels of restricted reactions and UG varied between ±(0–12) % (BP000) and ±(0–10) % (CBS4435), while enzyme activity levels of PP (BP000: ±86 %; CBS4435: ±69 %) and LG (BP000: ±118 %; CBS4435: ±53 %) showed strong variation. When the kinetic model of BP000 reached steady-state with respect to q xylose and Y xylitol, intracellular concentrations of NAD+, NADH, NADP+ and NADPH obtained for BP000 by the model (0.62 ± 0.01, 0.30 ± 0.01, 0.020 ± 0.003, 0.011 ± 0.003 mM, respectively) were close to those experimentally obtained (0.5, 0.3, 0.03, 0.02 mM, respectively) for the same strain under comparable conditions in a recent study [21].
Fig. 4

Reaction scheme of the kinetic model used in this work. Reversible reactions (R 1, R 2, R 3, R 6) are indicated by double arrows and enzymes are underlined. C3P and C5P refer to triose phosphates and pentose phosphates, respectively

Table 2

Reaction-specific kinetic parameters used in kinetic modeling

CtXRa

NAD(H) (R 1)

NADP(H) (R 2)

E

POb

POb

V f

1.0

1.3

V f/V r

13

25

K iA (mM)

0.18 ± 0.04

0.0019 ± 0.0001c

K mA (mM)

0.04 ± 0.01

0.005 ± 0.002

K mB (mM)

98 ± 22

108 ± 17

K iB (mM)d

392

3920

K iQ (mM)

0.344 ± 0.03

0.0059 ± 0.0004c

K mQ (mM)

0.019 ± 0.005

0.008 ± 0.001

K mP (mM)

529 ± 34

220 ± 18

K iP (mM)

758 ± 48

556 ± 48

K eq Haldane, e

134

142

K eq exp, e

142

156

GmXDHf(R 3)

 

PP (R 5), UG (R 9), LG (R 10)

 

E

POb

V f

POb

V f

1.0

K m (mM)

0.1

V r

12.6

  

\({K_{\rm{m,NAD}^{+}}}\) (mM)

0.14

PGIh (R 6)

 

K m,xylitol (mM)

14

 V f

POb

\({K_{\rm{i,NAD}^{+}}}\) (mM)

0.78

 K m,F6P (mM)

0.15

K i,xylitol (mM)d

4.5

 K m,G6P (mM)

0.30

K i,NADH (mM)

0.025

 K eq

3.23

K m,NADH (mM)

0.073

  

K m,xylulose (mM)

4.0

G6PDH (R 7)

 

K i,xylulose (mM)g

1.0

 V f

POb

K eq Haldane, e

7 × 10−4

 \({K_{\rm{m,NADP}^{+}}}\) (mM)

0.1

K eq exp, e

(4-7) × 10−4

 K m,G6P h (mM)

0.05

  

 K i,NADPH (mM)

0.20 (0.05)i

XK (R 4)

   

 V f

POb

GND (R 8)

 

 K m,xylulose (mM)h

0.31

 V f

POb

  

 K m,NADP + (mM)

0.02

  

 K m,6PG h (mM)

0.05

  

 K i,NADPH (mM)

0.02

aA, B, P, Q relate to NAD(P)H, xylose, xylitol, and NAD(P)+, respectively

bPO, values were found within a predefined range by parameter optimization (see main text and Additional file 1: Table S3)

cValues obtained from ligand-binding analysis using fluorescence spectroscopy (this study)

dValues calculated from Haldane relationship K eq = V f 2 K iP K mQ/(V r 2 K iB K mA) [38]

eEquilibrium constants were calculated in accordance with the Haldane relationship [K eq Haldane  = V f K mP K iQ/(V r K mB K iA)] [38]. Values can be compared to those experimentally obtained in this study (CtXR) or to reported K eq exp [39, 40]. Calculated Gibbs free energies of reaction of 6 ± 1 kJ mol−1 for the isomerization of xylose into xylulose [ΔG r = −RTln(K eqXR Haldane K eqXDH Haldane ] or ΔG r = −RTln(K eqXR exp K eqXDH exp ) are in excellence accordance with a value of 4.3 kJ mol−1 calculated from standard transformed Gibbs free energies of formation [41]

fReported kinetic parameters obtained from comprehensive full-kinetic study acquired at 25 °C in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 were applied [42]. A, B, P, and Q correspond to NAD+, xylitol, xylulose, and NADH, respectively. Note, to fulfill thermodynamic with respect to K eq exp reported upper limits were used for V r (1800 ± 350 s−1), K B (12 ± 2 mM) and lower limits for K P (8 ± 4 mM)

gValue was taken from [43]

hValues of kinetic parameters for XK, G6PDH, 6PGDH, and PGI were from Refs. [33, 44–46], respectively

iValue referred to CBS4435 (BP000). Note based on a sensitivity analysis implemented in Copasi K i of both ScG6PDH and CtG6PDH did not significantly influence FCC and YCC

To determine how activity levels of XR, XDH, XK, PP, PGI, G6PDH, GND, UG and LG influence Y xylitol and q xylose, respective yield (YCC) and flux (FCC) control coefficients, respectively, were determined based on MCA theory and assuming a change in each activity level of 1 % [23]. These traditional MCAs were performed for each strain and averages obtained at the steady state for FCC and YCC are shown in Fig. 5a, b, respectively. Note that a positive and negative control coefficient imply that an increase of activity level relative to its reference value is accompanied by an increase and decrease of q xylose or Y xylitol relative to its reference value, respectively. There is no control on conversion rate or yield when the control coefficient is 0. Both strains exhibited similar control patterns for q xylose (positive FCC: XR > XDH > PGI ≥ G6PDH > XDH; negative FCC: UG; no control on q xylose: PP, GND, LG) and Y xylitol (positive YCC: PGI ≥ G6PDH ≫ XR; negative YCC: UG ≫ XDH > XK; no control on Y xylitol: PP, GND, LG). FCCs and YCCs of G6PDH, GND, PGI and PP obtained for BP000 were in good agreement with previous experimental findings [14, 18, 19].
Fig. 5

Results from traditional MCA (a, b) and strain-to-strain MCA (c, d). a, b Display flux control coefficients (FCC) for q xylose and yield control coefficients (YCC) for Y xylitol, respectively. Note, in accordance with MCA theory FCC and YCC sum up to one (0.99 ± 0.02) and zero (0.01 ± 0.03), respectively [23]. Black and white bars represent data obtained for BP000 and CBS4435, respectively. c Shows the ratio of activity levels obtained for each reaction of CBS4435 (EACBS4435) and BP000 (EABP000) by parameter estimation analysis. Solid and dashed lines indicate ratios of 1 and 2, respectively. d Shows -fold changes on q xylose (full circles) and Y xylitol (empty circles) of BP000 due to individual changes of activity levels from the level obtained for BP000 (EABP000) to the level obtained for CBS4435 (EACBS4435). A ratio of 1 is indicated by the solid line. Positive (negative) values in a–d indicate an x-fold higher (lower) value relative to the reference value. Kinetic model obtained for BP000 was used as a reference in a–d

A comparison of activity level estimates obtained by parameter estimation analysis for BP000 and CBS4435 quantitatively corroborated trends that were observed in the enzyme activity analysis. Activity level estimates for UG were 13 ± 1-fold higher for CBS4435, while those of PP and UG were not distinguishable (Fig. 5c). To identify those reactions contributing to phenotype differences between BP000 and CBS4435, a strain-to-strain MCA was carried out. To this end, each activity level estimate obtained for BP000 was set individually to that value obtained for CBS4435 and effects on q xylose and Y xylitol were determined. Results are shown in Fig. 5d. Of the nine reactions tested, only three affected Y xylitol and/or q xylose significantly. Individual changes of XR (ninefold) and XDH (2.4-fold) activity levels led to a fourfold and 1.2-fold increase of q xylose, respectively, while changing the activity level of UG (13-fold) resulted in large decreases of both q xylose (2.5-fold) and Y xylitol (5.3-fold). UG represents a novel target involved in the control of xylose-to-ethanol conversion in yeasts. Note that an increase of both XR and UG activity levels is required to switch from a BP000-like phenotype to a CBS4435-like phenotype.

To test whether the kinetic model can be used to predict changes in Y xylitol and q xylose due to a change in the activity levels of one network reaction, we applied data from the literature. Results for q xylose and Y xylitol are shown in Fig. 6a, b respectively. Enzyme activity level estimates obtained for BP000, which displays a genotype and phenotype that is comparable to the reference strains used in these studies, served as a basis to simulate reduction of PGI activity (modifications 1 and 1′ [18]), knockout of GND (modification 3 [18]), knockout and variation of G6PDH activity levels (modifications 2, 4–6 [18, 19]), and increase of XR (modifications 7 and 7′ [13]) or XDH (modifications 8, 8′, 9, and 9′ [17]) activity levels. The experimentally observed effects for altering G6PDH and GND levels on Y xylitol and q xylose could be quantitatively predicted. Only a small adaption of the PGI activity level (reduction by a factor of five instead of ten as reported [18]) was needed to match reported effects on conversion rate and xylitol yield. However, when XR or XDH activity levels were individually addressed effects on q xylose and Y xylitol could not be predicted. V max of UG had to be increased in addition by a factor of 6 (XR), 4 (XDH, modification 8) and 6 (XDH, modification 9) to simulate reported effects. Results, therefore, pointed to a more complex substrate-to-enzyme reaction rate relationship for UG.
Fig. 6

Results from predictability analysis. a, b Display comparisons of predicted to experimentally observed effects on q xylose and Y xylitol, respectively, relative to a reference state due to different network modification (see main text). Numbering used: 1 and 1′ fivefold and tenfold lower activity levels of PGI; 2, 4, 5, and 6 knockout, 20-fold and fivefold lower and 5.6-fold higher activity levels of G6PDH; 3 knockout of GND; 7′ (6.7–10)-fold higher activity levels of XR; 8′ and 9′ 29-fold and 72-fold higher activity levels of XDH. Data 7, 8 and 9 display corresponding effects after increasing the activity level of UG by a factor of 6 (XR: tenfold higher), 4 and 6, respectively. Solid lines indicate perfect match of simulated vs. experimentally obtained effects. To simulate knockouts, a specific activity of 0.001 µmol/min/mg−1 was assumed (a value <0.01 µmol/min/mg has been reported [18]). Error bars indicate reported and obtained, by in silico analysis (±10 % variation on the extent of activity level modification was assumed), standard deviations

Additional parameter estimation analyses were performed to challenge the kinetic model with respect to biomass load and initial xylose concentrations. Experimental data obtained in our study (3.8 gdc/L BP000, 18 g/L xylose) and from a recent study by our workgroup [20] (1.6 gdc/L BP000, 12 g/L xylose) were fitted as described above and results are summarized in the Additional file 1: Table S3. Resultant models fitted time courses of xylose utilization and xylitol formation with R 2 > 0.999 (q xylose) and R 2 > 0.988 (Y xylitol) (Fig. 2b). Activity levels obtained from in silico analysis for all three BP000 xylose fermentations were identical with regard to the average verifying the usability and robustness of the kinetic model (Additional file 2: Fig. S1).

Discussion

Candida tenuis CBS4435 a potential alternative to current xylose-fermenting yeasts

Even in the first microorganism screenings, the yeast strain C. tenuis CBS4435 was recognized as a potential candidate for production of ethanol from xylose [24, 25]. Interestingly, however, no further studies have yet been performed with this strain in this respect. In our study, we quantitatively evaluated the capability of this CBS4435 strain to ferment xylose with respect to physiological parameters and compared it to its recombinant derivative BP000. Based on the key process parameters Y ethanol (0.44 g/g), Y xylitol (0.1 g/g) and q xylose (0.1 g/gdc/h) obtained in this study, C. tenuis CBS4435 can be ranked together with known S. stipitis strains among the best xylose-utilizing native yeasts [8].

Factors controlling strain fitness of natural and recombinant xylose-converting yeasts

There is an ongoing discussion about the difference in metabolic phenotypes between xylose-converting natural yeasts which efficiently ferment xylose to ethanol relative to their recombinant derivatives of S. cerevisiae which express the same XA pathway but produce xylitol instead of ethanol at low conversion rates. To address this question, we used C. tenuis CBS4435 and S. cerevisiae BP000 as representatives of natural and recombinant xylose-converting yeasts, respectively, and used a systems biology approach. We started with a kinetic model that is based on in vitro determined enzyme kinetic data to identify, by applying metabolic control analysis, candidate reactions that likely enable CBS4435 to ferment xylose efficiently. In the next step, results obtained from in silico analysis were verified by quantitative metabolite profiling and enzyme activity analysis. Finally, a metabolic scenario was developed with which differences in the metabolic phenotypes could be explained.

To identify target reactions that control q xylose and Y xylitol, we developed a new kinetic model and performed parameter estimation analysis using time courses of xylose utilization and xylitol formation as basis. In contrast to other enzyme mechanism-based kinetic models that have been used to study the yeast-type XA pathway in the past [16, 26], in our study XR utilized both coenzymes, NADPH was regenerated by reactions of the oPP pathway connected to the network, reactant concentrations were not fixed, the XA pathway was connected to the central carbon metabolism and in silico analyses were performed based on experimentally obtained time courses instead of assumed steady states. Parameter estimation analysis showed that enzyme activity levels and enzyme kinetic parameters measured by standard in vitro assays are highly suitable to describe time-dependent utilization of xylose and formation of xylitol for both BP000 and CBS4435. This observation suggests that xylose uptake did not limit q xylose in either strain. We were able to demonstrate that the kinetic model was robust to changes in biomass loads, initial xylose concentrations and selective network modifications in the central carbon metabolism. However, effects on q xylose and Y xylitol caused by increasing XR or XDH activity levels were merely simulated rather than predicted by the kinetic model. Results from MCA and the predictability study led to the suggestion that in contrast to network modifications executed downstream from the XA pathway, overexpression of XR or XDH positively affected the maximal flux capacity of UG. Underlying reasons at the molecular level are not known but our results indicated that the maximal flux capacity of UG is allosterically controlled in xylose-utilizing recombinant S. cerevisiae.

Since traditional MCA of kinetic models obtained for BP000 and CBS4435 provided no clue about targets involved in phenotype differentiation, we carried out MCA that was based on a strain-to-strain comparison and found two major targets, the XR activity level (tenfold higher in CBS4435) and the maximal flux capacity of UG (13-fold higher in CBS4435) and one minor target, the XDH activity level (twofold higher in CBS4435). Hence, aside from small positive contributions made by XDH to q xylose, high activity levels of XR paired with high flux capacities of UG are essential for CBS4435 to keep Y xylitol at low levels while permitting fast utilization of xylose relative to that of BP000. The resulting 2.3-fold [=0.67 × 0.60/(0.47 × 0.37)] faster carbon flux at the F6P node towards C3-carbon phosphates is, therefore, a consequence of a kinetic pull exerted by reactions of the UG rather than by blocking carbon flux through reactions of the oPP pathway. The 13-fold higher V max of UG predicted by the kinetic model for CBS4435 cannot be explained by the twofold higher levels of FBA observed for CBS4435. Only little flux control by FBA can be assumed as the reaction operates close to equilibrium [21]. Although we were not able to measure PFK activity in CBS4435 cell-free extracts, our results from strain-to-strain MCA, quantitative metabolite profiling and enzyme activity analysis provided sufficient indirect evidence to deduce an essential role of PFK in controlling carbon flux through UG. In a recent study, we showed that in BP000 metabolizing xylose under anaerobic conditions, the PFK activity should be hypersensitive to a change in the F6P level [21]. A five-fold higher F6P level (assuming that PGI reaction is at equilibrium in both strains), as observed here for CBS4435 relative to BP000, should therefore translate into a faster reaction rate of the ScPFK catalyzed reaction. A 9.4-fold increase of PFK activity can be calculated by applying the respective allosteric reaction model and reported reactant concentrations [21, 27]. Although the reaction mechanism of CtPFK is not known, a similar kinetic push by an atypical Michaelis Menten dependence for F6P is conceivable for CtPFK in light of our results obtained in this study.

High XR activity levels (XR-to-XDH >1) in recombinant S. cerevisiae strains have always led to an increase of q xylose, a decrease of Y xylitol but also to an enhanced release of glycerol which was explained by the ability of SsXR to reduce DHAP with NADH [13]. On the contrary, the expression at similarly high levels of SsXR in S. stipitis [8] and CtXR in CBS4435 [CtXR is also active on DHAP (Additional file 3)] did not induce pronounced glycerol formation even though the Glyc3P level in CBS4435 [high levels of Glyc3P were also found by our workgroup for S. stipitis (Additional file 2: Fig. S2)] was about 20-fold higher relative to BP000. Supported by enzyme activity measurements, the accumulation of high Glyc3P levels in CBS4435 was mostly an effect of limiting GPP activity levels. Deletion of both isoenzyme forms of GPP in S. cerevisiae resulted in a strain that also accumulated Glyc3P [28]. Based on the presented data, a more general metabolic scenario for efficient conversion of xylose to ethanol is proposed for natural yeasts: carbon flux from F6P towards ethanol is kept at a high rate by maintaining large pool sizes of metabolites of the UG which build up as a consequence of (1) pushing xylose carbon through the PP pathway and (2) blocking the metabolic flux through the glycerol pathway.

Conclusions

In this work, we could demonstrate that integrating data obtained from metabolic control analysis based on kinetic modeling, quantitative metabolite profiling and enzyme activity analysis represent a powerful approach to identify metabolic and kinetic interactions that play an important role in controlling the key process parameters, q xylose and Y xylitol. With PFK and GPP, two new targets were identified based on the evidences presented. From a metabolic engineering point of view, the proposed control mechanism conducted by these enzymes is interesting as it should be independent of the type of XA. These new insights into the metabolic and kinetic control of q xylose and Y xylitol will have, therefore, important implications in the future design of efficient and fast microbial ethanol producers.

Methods

Microorganisms

C. tenuis CBS4435 was obtained from the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (Baarn, The Netherlands) and maintained at 25 °C on YPD-agar containing yeast extract (1 % w/v), peptone from Casein (2 % w/v), glucose (2 % w/v) and agar (1.6 % w/v). The pH value of the YP portion of the medium was adjusted to 5.5 prior to sterilization. Cells from late-exponential phase grown in YPD medium at 25 °C were used for long-term storage in a glycerol (60 % v/v)—YPD medium at −70 °C. The recombinant S. cerevisiae strain BP000 was used that expresses chromosomally integrated XR from C. tenuis CBS4435 (CtXR), XDH from Galactocandida mastotermitis (GmXDH) and endogenous XK (ScXK), each under the control of a strong constitutive TDH promoter [20].

Biomass preparation

Biomass of CBS4435 used in conversion experiments was prepared at 25 °C by two consecutive cultivations. First, a loopful of cells was transferred aseptically from a freshly overgrown YPD-agar plate into a baffled 300 mL shake flask containing 50 mL of mineral (M-) medium (see later). Cells were cultivated overnight at 125 rpm. These cultures served as inoculum for the preparation of biomass which was carried out at 125 rpm in baffled 1000 mL shake flasks containing 300 mL of M-medium. The initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was 0.05. Cells from preparatory cultures were harvested at an OD600 of 3–4 by centrifugation (4400g, 15 min, 4 °C) and washed once with a cold physiological NaCl (0.9 % w/v) solution prior to xylose conversion experiments. The M-medium used contained 14.4 g/L KH2PO4, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, and 0.025 % (v/v) Antifoam 204 (Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna). The pH was adjusted to a value of 5.5 prior to sterilization. Vitamins as well as trace elements were added as described by [29]. Xylose (18 g/L) represented the sole carbon source to induce expression of enzymes which constitute the XA pathway in CBS4435 [22]. The same protocol for biomass preparation was applied for BP000 with the exception of glucose as the carbon source (instead of xylose), an initial pH of 5.5 (instead of 6.5) and a cultivation temperature of 30 °C (instead of 25 °C).

Anaerobic xylose conversions

Xylose conversions were carried out at 25 °C (CBS4435) or at 30 °C (BP000) in a Labfors bioreactor (Infors HT, Bottmingen, Switzerland, working volume: 2000 mL; stirrer: two six-bladed disc impellers; ratio of impeller to reactor diameter was 0.4; 200 rpm). The same M-medium as described above was used except for KH2PO4 (3 g/L), ergosterol (10 mg/L) and Tween-80 (0.42 g/L). The pH was maintained at values of 4.5 ± 0.1 (CBS4435) and 5.5 ± 0.1 (BP000). Conversions were carried out with 0.9 and 3.8 g/L (BP000) or with 1.1 g/L (CBS4435) of dry cells. Anaerobic conditions were maintained by sparging the culture continuously with nitrogen (purity 5.0, 0.16 vvm). All conversion experiments were carried out in duplicates.

Analytics of external metabolites

Sample work-up, monitoring of cell growth (recorded as OD600) and off-gas analysis (CO2 and ethanol) using an acoustic gas analyzer (IN1313, Innova AirTech Instruments, Ballerup, Denmark) were carried out as described by [29]. Cell dry weights were determined as described recently [30] and correlated with optical densities using an averaged factor of 0.41 g dry cells (gdc) per unit of OD600 for both strains. Concentrations of xylose and fermentation products were analyzed by HPLC–UV/RI using an Aminex HPX87-H column and 0.5 mM H2SO4 as eluent [20].

Analytics of intracellular metabolites

For the analysis of intracellular metabolites, xylose fermentations for BP000 and CBS4435 were carried out in a bioreactor (working volume 1000 mL) as described above and by applying 0.25 g/L KH2PO4 and 1.3–1.4 gdc/L (BP000) or 0.9–1.0gdc/L (CBS4435). Low concentrations of KH2PO4 in the medium were necessary to reduce the effect of ion suppression during LC/MS analysis. The applied KH2PO4 concentrations did not affect phenotypes of BP000 and CBS4435 (data not shown). Samples were withdrawn after 24 h of xylose fermentation which represented the pseudo-steady state of xylose-to-ethanol conversion. A protocol for sample preparation as described by [21] was used with slight modifications (see Additional file 3). Metabolite samples containing 13C-labeled metabolite yeast extract as internal standard (ISTD) were analyzed by LC–MS. A Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC setup (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) equipped with a reversed-phase Atlantis T3 C18 pre- and analytical column (Waters, USA) was used [31]. For metabolite separation, a 40-min gradient was applied: 2-propanol was used as eluent A and aqueous methanol solution [(5 % methanol v/v), tributylamine (10 mM), acetic acid (15 mM), pH 4.95] was used as eluent B. The injection volume per sample was 10 µL. Mass spectrometric detection was carried out with an Exactive™ Orbitrap system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Heated electrospray ionization (HESI) was used for negative ionization and masses between 70 and 1100 m/z were detected with a resolution of 50,000 (at m/z 200) in full scan mode. Identical compounds (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, of highest purity available) containing ISTD were used as standards to cover a concentration range of 0.4–100 µM. MS data were analyzed with TraceFinder™-software Version 3.1. (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Eleven intracellular metabolites [ATP, ADP, AMP, ribulose-5P (Ru5P), ribose-5P (Ri5P), 6-phosphogluconate (6PG), fructose 1,6-bisP (F1,6BP), DHAP, glycerol-3P (Glyc3P), phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and pyruvate (PYR)] and three metabolite pools [sum of hexose phosphates (HXP), sum of 2PG and 3PG (XPG; PG, phosphoglycerate), sum of 1,3-BPG and 2,3BPG (X,3BPG)] were quantified for each strain and respective concentrations were calculated as averages from a total of eight samples obtained from two individual fermentations (four replicates per fermentation).

Determination of specific enzyme activities in cell-free extracts

Enzyme activities were analyzed at 25 °C (CBS4435, BP000) and at 30 °C (BP000) from cell-free extracts by means of the initial rate method. Cell-free extracts were prepared at 4 °C from cells metabolizing xylose at the pseudo-steady state using a French Press (1500 psi, SLM Aminco, Silver Spring, MD, USA). Cells were washed once with ice-cold physiological sodium chloride solution and re-suspended in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (PBB) pH 7.0 prior to cell disruption. The amount of soluble protein was analyzed using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA) referenced against bovine serum albumin. Time-dependent utilization of NADPH (XR) or NADH [XR, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), XK, phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI), 6-phosphofructokinase (PFK), F1,6BP aldolase (FBA), pyruvate kinase (PYK)] as well as formation of NADH [XDH, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)] or NADPH (ALDH, G6PDH and GND) was recorded at 340 nm using a DU800 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) equipped with a Peltier temperature controller. A molar extinction coefficient of 6.22/cm/mM was used for NAD(P)H. Release of phosphate from Glyc3P over time was analyzed for Glyc3P phosphatase (GPP) activity. Phosphate concentrations were determined from cleared samples treated at 99 °C for 5 min as described by [32]. Compositions of reaction mixtures are presented in the Additional file 1: Table S4. Appropriate reference measurements were carried out and considered as required.

Kinetic modeling

The reaction model as shown in Fig. 4 was used as the basis for in silico analysis. To reduce the degree of complexity, stoichiometry of carbon conversion was used for XK (R 4), the PP pathway (R 5), the upper part of glycolysis (UG) (R 9; combining PFK and FBA) and for the lower part of glycolysis (LG) up to ethanol formation (R 10). We did not consider ATP in the model as under the fermentation conditions used the reaction catalyzed by XK should be well saturated by ATP [compare K ATP of 0.17 mM and 0.28 mM reported for XKs of S. cerevisiae [33] and S. stipitis [34], respectively, with intracellular concentrations of ATP estimated for BP000 and other xylose-metabolizing recombinant S. cerevisiae strains (3–4 mM) [21]]. As both strains investigated in this study were not able to grow on xylose under the conditions applied, biomass formation was not included in the model. Respective rate equations and corresponding kinetic parameters are shown in the Additional file 1: Table S2 and Table 2, respectively. Known rate equations including reversibility were used for XDH (R 3) and PGI (R 6). The complete rate equation for CtXR involving reversibility as well as alternate binding of NAD(P)(H) (R 1, R 2) was derived in this study and verified (see Additional files 2: Scheme S1; Fig. S3 and 3). Simplified rate equations were applied for XK (R 4), PP pathway (R 5), UG (R 9) and LG (R 10), while representative rate expressions were used for G6PDH (R 7) and GND (R 8) which take competitive product inhibition by NADPH into account.

Selection of known and determination of so far unknown model-relevant kinetic data are described in detail in the Additional file 3. Briefly, all 24 kinetic parameters required for simulating the XR reaction were determined. Values for \(K_{\text{m,NADP}}^{+}\) and K i,NADPH were measured for Sc(Ct)G6PDH and Sc(Ct)GND. The set of kinetic parameters describing a reversible ordered Bi Bi mechanism reported for GmXDH was applied to both XDHs. Similarly, a reported K m,xylulose for ScXK and the set of kinetic parameters reported for ScPGI were used. For lumped reactions R 5, R 9 and R 10, a Michaelis constant of 0.1 mM was assumed.

Parameter estimation analysis

Time courses of xylose utilization and xylitol production obtained for CBS4435 (this study) and BP000 (this study and from [20]) were used as a basis to fit the kinetic model by parameter estimation. Both time courses which represent mutually independent parameters were fitted simultaneously. The software package Copasi 4.8.35 (http://www.copasi.org [35, 36]) was used. Only the pseudo-steady-state phase of xylose conversion which is free of substrate limitation and ethanol or other unspecific inhibitions was subjected to parameter estimation by evolutionary programming. After transformation, upper and lower bounds of specific enzyme activities measured at 25 °C (CBS4435) and 30 °C (BP000) were applied to the respective cell-specific molar rates (mmol/h/gdc) by assuming that on a mass basis the protein content in dry yeast cells accounts for 40 % [37]. Intracellular activity levels of R 5, R 9 and R 10 were used in a range of 0.1–10, 1–100 and 1–100 mmol/h/gdc, respectively. Initial concentrations of coenzymes were constrained to ranges reported for BP000 [21]. A complete summary of input parameters is presented in the Additional file 1: Table S3.

Flux balance analysis

A metabolic reaction network was designed consisting of 32 reactions involving xylose assimilation, PP pathway, oxidative PP pathway (oPP) and glycolysis as well as glycerol, acetate and ethanol production. For XR, one reaction was used for each coenzyme. Upper and lower bounds of experimentally obtained molar production rates of ethanol, xylitol, glycerol and acetate were applied. To capture network flexibility and experimental variations, simulations were carried out at upper and lower bounds and at the average value of q xylose. Two different objective functions (CO2 and ATP formation) were individually applied for linear optimization by linprog (Optimization Toolbox, Matlab R2013b, Mathworks, Inc., USA).

Abbreviations

XA: 

xylose assimilation

XR: 

xylose reductase

XDH: 

xylose dehydrogenase

XK: 

xylulokinase

PP: 

pentose phosphate

oPP: 

oxidative PP

FCC: 

flux control coefficient

YCC: 

yield control coefficient

MCA: 

metabolic control analysis

R i : 

reaction rate of the ith reaction

Sc: 

S. cerevisiae

Ct: 

C. tenuis

Ss: 

Scheffersomyces stipitis

Gm: 

Galactocandida mastotermitis

Y : 

product yield

q : 

specific conversion rate

ADH: 

alcohol dehydrogenase

ALDH: 

aldehyde dehydrogenase

UG: 

upper glycolysis

LG: 

lower glycolysis

G6P: 

glucose 6-phosphate

F6P: 

fructose 6-phosphate

HXP: 

hexose phosphate

C3P: 

triose phosphate

C5P: 

pentose phosphate

GAP: 

glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate

DHAP: 

dihydroxyacetone phosphate

PYR: 

pyruvate

Ru5P: 

ribulose 5-phosphate

Ri5P: 

ribose 5-phosphate

F1,6-BP: 

fructose 1,6-bisphosphate

X,3 BPG: 

bisphosphoglycerate, X stands for 1- or 2-

XPG: 

phosphoglycerate, X stands for 2- or 3-

PEP: 

phosphenolpyruvate

Glyc3P: 

glycerol 3-phosphate

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SK, BN and MK designed fermentation experiments; GT and CG carried out xylose fermentations and GT, CG and SK analyzed the data; GT, CM and MK designed metabolomics experiments; GT performed quantitative metabolomics and GT and CM analyzed the data; MK derived the rate equation for XR; GT and BN helped to draft the manuscript and MK wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Karin Longus for expert technical assistance and for measuring enzyme activities, Regina Kratzer for kindly providing DHAP data for CtXR, Anna K. Trummer for determining Glyc3P concentrations of S. stipitis, Thomas Riebenbauer for expert assistance in setting up the Matlab-based linear optimization routine used for flux balance analysis, and Selma Mautner for comprehensive proof reading of the manuscript. Metabolomics part of this work was financed by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT), Project Met2Net.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Biotechnology and Biochemical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz
(2)
HEALTH-Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft m.b.H.

References

  1. Cai Z, Zhang B, Li Y. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: reflections and perspectives. Biotechnol J. 2012;7(1):34–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim SR, Park YC, Jin YS, Seo JH. Strain engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced xylose metabolism. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(6):851–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.03.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Matsushika A, Inoue H, Kodaki T, Sawayama S. Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84(1):37–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2101-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu BC, Lee H. Genetic improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25(5):425–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hahn-Hagerdal B, Wahlbom CF, Gardonyi M, van Zyl WH, Cordero Otero RR, Jonsson LJ. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose utilization. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2001;73:53–84.Google Scholar
  6. Jeffries TW. Engineering yeasts for xylose metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17(3):320–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. van Maris AJ, Winkler AA, Kuyper M, de Laat WT, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Development of efficient xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: xylose isomerase as a key component. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;108:179–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2007_057.Google Scholar
  8. Krahulec S, Kratzer R, Longus K, Nidetzky B. Comparison of Scheffersomyces stipitis strains CBS 5773 and CBS 6054 with regard to their xylose metabolism: implications for xylose fermentation. MicrobiologyOpen. 2012;1(1):64–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wahlbom CF, van Zyl WH, Jonsson LJ, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Otero RR. Generation of the improved recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB 3400 by random mutagenesis and physiological comparison with Pichia stipitis CBS 6054. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003;3(3):319–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Eliasson A, Christensson C, Wahlbom CF, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Anaerobic xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae carrying XYL1, XYL2, and XKS1 in mineral medium chemostat cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(8):3381–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Krahulec S, Klimacek M, Nidetzky B. Analysis and prediction of the physiological effects of altered coenzyme specificity in xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase during xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol. 2012;158(4):192–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.08.026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Matsushika A, Sawayama S. Efficient bioethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires high activity of xylose reductase and moderate xylulokinase activity. J Biosci Bioeng. 2008;106(3):306–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeppsson M, Träff K, Johansson B, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Effect of enhanced xylose reductase activity on xylose consumption and product distribution in xylose-fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003;3(2):167–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Johansson B, Hahn-Hägerdal B. The non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway controls the fermentation rate of xylulose but not of xylose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3001. FEMS Yeast Res. 2002;2(3):277–82.Google Scholar
  15. Kötter P, Ciriacy M. Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993;38:776–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Eliasson A, Hofmeyr J-HS, Pedler S, Hahn-Hägerdal B. The xylose reductase/xylitol dehydrogenase/xylulokinase ratio affects product formation in recombinant xylose-utilising Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzym Microb Technol. 2001;29:288–97Google Scholar
  17. Kim SR, Ha SJ, Kong II, Jin YS. High expression of XYL2 coding for xylitol dehydrogenase is necessary for efficient xylose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2012;14(4):336–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeppsson M, Johansson B, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Reduced oxidative pentose phosphate pathway flux in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains improves the ethanol yield from xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1604–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeppsson M, Johansson B, Jensen PR, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. The level of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity strongly influences xylose fermentation and inhibitor sensitivity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Yeast (Chichester, England). 2003;20(15):1263–72.Google Scholar
  20. Petschacher B, Nidetzky B. Altering the coenzyme preference of xylose reductase to favor utilization of NADH enhances ethanol yield from xylose in a metabolically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2008;7:9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Klimacek M, Krahulec S, Sauer U, Nidetzky B. Limitations in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae, made evident through comprehensive metabolite profiling and thermodynamic analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(22):7566–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01787-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kern M, Haltrich D, Nidetzky B, Kulbe KD. Induction of aldose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase activities in Candida tenuis CBS 4435. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;149(1):31–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Stephanopoulos GN, Aristidou AA, Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering, principles and methodologies. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  24. Björling T, Lindman B. Evaluation of xylose-fermenting yeasts for ethanol production from spent sulfite liquor. Enzym Microb Technol. 1989;11:240–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Toivola A, Yarrow D, van den Bosch E, van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. Alcoholic fermentation of D-xylose by yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984;47(6):1221–3.Google Scholar
  26. Parachin NS, Bergdahl B, van Niel EW, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Kinetic modelling reveals current limitations in the production of ethanol from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2011;13(5):508–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.05.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofmann E, Kopperschläger G. Phosphofructokinase from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1982;90(Pt E):49–60.Google Scholar
  28. Pahlman AK, Granath K, Ansell R, Hohmann S, Adler L. The yeast glycerol 3-phosphatases Gpp1p and Gpp2p are required for glycerol biosynthesis and differentially involved in the cellular responses to osmotic, anaerobic, and oxidative stress. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(5):3555–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M007164200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Krahulec S, Petschacher B, Wallner M, Longus K, Klimacek M, Nidetzky B. Fermentation of mixed glucose-xylose substrates by engineered strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the coenzyme specificity of xylose reductase, and effect of glucose on xylose utilization. Microb Cell Fact. 2010;9:16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Novy V, Krahulec S, Wegleiter M, Müller G, Longus K, Klimacek M, et al. Process intensification through microbial strain evolution: mixed glucose-xylose fermentation in wheat straw hydrolyzates by three generations of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Buescher JM, Moco S, Sauer U, Zamboni N. Ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for fast and robust quantification of anionic and aromatic metabolites. Anal Chem. 2010;82(11):4403–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100101d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Saheki S, Takeda A, Shimazu T. Assay of inorganic phosphate in the mild pH range, suitable for measurement of glycogen phosphorylase activity. Anal Biochem. 1985;148(2):277–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Richard P, Toivari MH, Penttilä M. The role of xylulokinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae xylulose catabolism. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;190(1):39–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Flanagan T, Waites MJ. Purification and characterization of D-xylulokinase from the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis Ncyc-1541. Enzym Microb Technol. 1992;14(12):975–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(92)90080-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Lee C, Pahle J, Simus N et al. COPASI—a complex pathway simulator. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2006;22(24):3067–74.Google Scholar
  36. Mendes P, Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Dada J, Kummer U. Computational modeling of biochemical networks using COPASI. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2009;500:17–59.Google Scholar
  37. Lange HC, Heijnen JJ. Statistical reconciliation of the elemental and molecular biomass composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;75(3):334–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Segel IH. Enzyme kinetics. In: Behavior and analysis of rapid equilibrium and steady-state enzyme systems. New York: Wiley; 1993.Google Scholar
  39. Tewari YB, Goldberg RN. Thermodynamics of reactions catalyzed by l-iditol 2-dehydrogenase: the xylose assimilation pathway. J Chem Thermodyn. 1996;28:1127–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Rizzi M, Harwart K, Erlemann P, Bui-Thanh N-A, Dellweg H. Purification and properties of the NAD+-xylitol-dehydrogenase from the yeast Pichia stipitis. J Ferment Bioeng. 1989;67(1):20–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Alberty RA. Thermodynamics of biochemical reactions. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Nidetzky B, Helmer H, Klimacek M, Lunzer R, Mayer G. Characterization of recombinant xylitol dehydrogenase from Galactocandida mastotermitis expressed in Escherichia coli. Chem Biol Interact. 2003;143–144:533–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Lunzer R, Mamnun Y, Haltrich D, Kulbe KD, Nidetzky B. Structural and functional properties of a yeast xylitol dehydrogenase, a Zn2+-containing metalloenzyme similar to medium-chain sorbitol dehydrogenases. Biochem J. 1998;336(Pt 1):91–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hasmann FA, Gurpilhares DB, Roberto IC, Converti A, Pessoa A. New combined kinetic and thermodynamic approach to model glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity and stability. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007;40(4):849–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.06.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. He W, Wang Y, Liu W, Zhou CZ. Crystal structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase Gnd1. BMC Struct Biol. 2007;7:38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-7-38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Gao H, Chen Y, Leary JA. Kinetic measurements of phosphoglucose isomerase and phosphomannose isomerase by direct analysis of phosphorylated aldose-ketose isomers using tandem mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2005;240(3):291–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2004.09.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Trausinger et al. 2015

Advertisement