Open Access

Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce a reduced viscosity oil from lignocellulose

  • Tam N. T. Tran1,
  • Rebecca J. Breuer2,
  • Ragothaman Avanasi Narasimhan2,
  • Lucas S. Parreiras2,
  • Yaoping Zhang2,
  • Trey K. Sato2Email author and
  • Timothy P. Durrett1Email author
Contributed equally
Biotechnology for Biofuels201710:69

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0751-y

Received: 25 November 2016

Accepted: 9 March 2017

Published: 20 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Acetyl-triacylglycerols (acetyl-TAGs) are unusual triacylglycerol (TAG) molecules that contain an sn-3 acetate group. Compared to typical triacylglycerol molecules (here referred to as long chain TAGs; lcTAGs), acetyl-TAGs possess reduced viscosity and improved cold temperature properties, which may allow direct use as a drop-in diesel fuel. Their different chemical and physical properties also make acetyl-TAGs useful for other applications such as lubricants and plasticizers. Acetyl-TAGs can be synthesized by EaDAcT, a diacylglycerol acetyltransferase enzyme originally isolated from Euonymus alatus (Burning Bush). The heterologous expression of EaDAcT in different organisms, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, resulted in the accumulation of acetyl-TAGs in storage lipids. Microbial conversion of lignocellulose into acetyl-TAGs could allow biorefinery production of versatile molecules for biofuel and bioproducts.

Results

In order to produce acetyl-TAGs from abundant lignocellulose feedstocks, we expressed EaDAcT in S. cerevisiae previously engineered to utilize xylose as a carbon source. The resulting strains were capable of producing acetyl-TAGs when grown on different media. The highest levels of acetyl-TAG production were observed with growth on synthetic lab media containing glucose or xylose. Importantly, acetyl-TAGs were also synthesized by this strain in ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX)-pretreated corn stover hydrolysate (ACSH) at higher volumetric titers than previously published strains. The deletion of the four endogenous enzymes known to contribute to lcTAG production increased the proportion of acetyl-TAGs in the total storage lipids beyond that in existing strains, which will make purification of these useful lipids easier. Surprisingly, the strains containing the four deletions were still capable of synthesizing lcTAG, suggesting that the particular strain used in this study possesses additional undetermined diacylglycerol acyltransferase activity. Additionally, the carbon source used for growth influenced the accumulation of these residual lcTAGs, with higher levels in strains cultured on xylose containing media.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that S. cerevisiae can be metabolically engineered to produce acetyl-TAGs when grown on different carbon sources, including hydrolysate derived from lignocellulose. Deletion of four endogenous acyltransferases enabled a higher purity of acetyl-TAGs to be achieved, but lcTAGs were still synthesized. Longer incubation times also decreased the levels of acetyl-TAGs produced. Therefore, additional work is needed to further manipulate acetyl-TAG production in this strain of S. cerevisiae, including the identification of other TAG biosynthetic and lipolytic enzymes and a better understanding of the regulation of the synthesis and degradation of storage lipids.

Keywords

Acetyl-TAGs Saccharomyces cerevisiae AFEX corn stover hydrolysate Metabolic engineering

Background

Fossil-derived carbon represents the major source of the fuels and chemical products used by modern society. As this source is finite, and because combustion of fossil fuels contributes to climate change, alternate sustainable sources for energy and chemical precursors are being sought. Microbial conversion of renewable plant feedstocks into biofuels and commodity or specialty chemicals represents one strategy to replace our current dependence on fossil fuels.

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which has long been used by the fuel ethanol industry, is considered a potential biocatalyst to convert sugars from lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels. S. cerevisiae displays robust tolerance to industrial conditions and is highly efficient at fermenting glucose. However, native S. cerevisiae cannot catabolize xylose, which can make up almost half of the total sugars in plant biomass [1]. Thus, S. cerevisiae has been genetically engineered and evolved to convert xylose into ethanol. This includes the introduction of fungal xylose reductase, xylitol dehydrogenase, and xylulokinase (XR-XDH-XK), to allow the conversion of xylose into xylulose-5-phosphate, which can then be converted into acetyl-CoA for catabolic or anabolic processes (reviewed recently in [2, 3]). Despite these genetic changes, engineered yeast still displays diauxic sugar consumption; glucose is preferentially consumed first, followed by xylose. In addition to ethanol, isobutanol [47], butanol [8], and fatty acid [912] biofuels have been generated from pure glucose and xylose by engineered S. cerevisiae, but not from sugars derived from lignocellulosic biomass.

Another potential group of molecules that could be used not only as biofuel but also as a bioproduct for chemical upgrading are 3-acetyl-1,2-diacyl-glycerols (acetyl-TAGs), unusual triacylglycerol (TAG) molecules that possess an sn-3 acetate group (Fig. 1). The presence of the short acetate group rather than a long fatty acid means that acetyl-TAGs possess unique chemical and physical properties compared to regular long chain TAGs (hereon referred to as lcTAG; Fig. 1). For example, acetyl-TAGs possess lower viscosity and improved cold-temperature characteristics compared to other vegetable oils [13, 14]. Because the viscosities of most plant-derived triacylglycerols prevent their direct use in diesel engines [15], acetyl-TAGs could potentially be used as an improved low-viscosity straight vegetable oil biofuel. The higher oxygenated state of lipid-derived diesel replacements compared to conventional diesel results in lower emissions of particulates and other chemical pollutants [16], suggesting other environmental benefits to the use of these renewable fuels. In addition, with their sn-3 acetate group, acetyl-TAGs are structurally equivalent to semi-synthetically produced acetic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides (ACETEM) which can be used as food grade emulsifiers, lubricants, and non-phthalate-based plasticizers for polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and other plastic products [17]. In fact, tests of plastic films produced using ACETEM revealed that the vegetable oil-based plasticizers possessed better mechanical performance compared to conventional phthalate-based plasticizers [18].
Fig. 1

Acetyl-TAGs possess an sn-3 acetate group. Structures of representative acetyl-TAG and long-chain TAG (lcTAG) molecules

While acetyl-TAGs are naturally found in the seeds of a number of different plant species [19, 20], none of these are particularly well suited for large-scale production. The identification of the acetyltransferase EaDAcT required for the synthesis of acetyl-TAGs in the seeds of Euonymus alatus has allowed the synthesis of these unusual molecules in species that typically do not produce them. For example, very high levels of acetyl-TAGs have been synthesized in the seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana and Camelina sativa by expressing EaDAcT and simultaneously downregulating endogenous lcTAG production [14, 21]. Likewise, production of acetyl-TAGs has also been demonstrated in yeast. Here too, the elimination of regular lcTAG synthesis resulted in the accumulation of almost pure acetyl-TAGs [13] suggesting one strategy for the production of acetyl-TAGs. In this case, the removal of competing lcTAG biosynthetic enzymes was achieved by expressing EaDAcT in a yeast background containing mutations in the DGA1, LRO1, ARE1, and ARE2 genes that encode such activity [22].

Here, we demonstrate that acetyl-TAGs can be produced in a yeast strain previously engineered to use xylose as a carbon source. Further, we were able to increase the acetyl-TAG composition of the storage lipids produced in this strain by deleting endogenous enzymes known to contribute to lcTAG production. However, residual lcTAGs were still produced in these engineered yeast strains. Finally, we show that acetyl-TAGs can be synthesized by these strains when grown on a variety of carbon sources. Notably, acetyl-TAGs could be produced from pure xylose and AFEX corn stover hydrolysate (ACSH), the first demonstration that an advanced biofuel lipid can be synthesized from lignocellulose.

Results

The H1246 yeast mutant fails to produce TAGs when grown in corn stover hydrolysate

Previously, we have demonstrated that yeast strains expressing EaDAcT synthesize acetyl-TAGs from lab medium containing glucose [13]. In particular, expression of EaDAcT in the H1246 mutant strain devoid of lcTAG synthesis [22] resulted in only acetyl-TAGs being present in the storage lipids. Desiring to synthesize acetyl-TAGs on sugar sources that would be readily available from lignocellulosic feedstocks, we cultured EaDAcT expressing strains in AFEX corn stover hydrolysate (ACSH) and lab media containing yeast extract and peptone with glucose and xylose (YPDX) at equivalent concentrations to that found in ACSH. Similar to previous results when glucose was used [13], a mixture of lcTAGs and acetyl-TAGs was produced by the SCY62 wild-type background at similar titers in both YPDX and ACSH, with acetyl-TAGs constituting 26% of the total mass of TAGs produced (Fig. 2a; Table 1). The isogenic H1246 quadruple mutant expressing EaDAcT, which does not synthesize lcTAGs [13], produced significant levels of acetyl-TAGs when grown on YPDX, but much lower titer and yield of acetyl-TAGs when grown in ACSH (Fig. 2b; Table 1). Also notable, the growth rates of SCY62 wild-type and H1246 mutant strains were lower in ACSH compared to YPDX media, resulting in 10- and 23-fold reductions, respectively, in the volumetric acetyl-TAG titers by the two strains between the two media conditions (Table 1). Importantly, no TAGs were identified from ACSH alone by thin-layer chromatography (data not shown), indicating that the yeast strains were producing acetyl-TAGs de novo, rather than taking up TAGs from the media.
Fig. 2

The H1246 yeast mutant fails to produce TAGs when grown in ACSH. Quantification of lcTAG and acetyl-TAG content of BY4741 background strains with different combinations of altered lcTAG biosynthesis or EaDAcT expression grown on YPDX for 18 h (a) or ACSH for 24 h (b). Values represent the mean ± S.D. of acetyl-TAG or lcTAG content derived from four different ESI–MS analyses and are representative of at least two replicate cultures

Table 1

Fermentation properties for engineered and evolved S. cerevisiae strains

Medium

Aerobic YPDX

Aerobic ACSH

Strain

SCY62+EaDAcT

H1246+EaDAcT

4KO+EaDAcT

SCY62+EaDAcT

H1246+EaDAcT

4KO+EaDAcT

Acetyl-TAG titera

2400 ± 65

1500 ± 180

3000 ± 42

2200 ± 95

160 ± 19

1100 ± 6.2

Volumetric acetyl-TAG titerb

15 ± 2.0

6.9 ± 0.11

32 ± 2.5

14 ± 0.13

0.30 ± 0.036

7.9 ± 0.087

lcTAG titerc

6800 ± 0.20

ND

4200 ± 44

6300 ± 0.10

96 ± 1.1

2300 ± 2.2

Volumetric lcTAG titerd

43 ± 5.9

ND

45 ± 3.3

4.0 ± 0.37

0.18 ± 0.016

16 ± 0.10

% acetyl-TAGse

31 ± 0.21

100 ± 0

48 ± 0.52

31 ± 0.097

67 ± 0.99

38 ± 0.36

Estimated growth ratef

0.34 ± 0.049

0.25 ± 0.035

0.58 ± 0.044

0.021 ± 0.0004

0.074 ± 0.002

0.29 ± 0.0003

Y acTAG/glc g

260 ± 9.5

130 ± 9.8

510 ± 48

120 ± 18

8.0 ± 1.5

120 ± 0.67

Y lcTAG/glc h

750 ± 32

ND

710 ± 65

330 ± 51

4.8 ± 0.76

250 ± 2.6

ND not detected

aIn μg of acetyl-TAG/g of dry cell weight (DCW)

bIn mg of acetyl-TAG/L

cIn μg of lcTAG/g of DCW

dIn mg of lcTAG/L

eMole percentage of acetyl-TAG produced out of the total TAG produced

fIn g of DCW/L/h within 18 h (in YPDX medium) or 24 h (in ACSH medium) of growth

gYield in μg of acetyl-TAG produced/g of glucose consumed

hYield in μg lcTAG produced/g of glucose consumed

A wild yeast strain integrated with EaDAcT produces acetyl-TAGs

Our observation that the H1246+EaDAcT strain grew more slowly and produced acetyl-TAGs at lower yield in ACSH compared to YPDX (Table 1) suggested that components in ACSH had negative impacts on this strain background. ACSH contains significant concentrations of small molecules that are generated during biomass pretreatment, including phenolic acids, amides, aldehydes, organic acids, and acetamide [2325] that impair growth and conversion of sugars into ethanol. One possible mechanism for reduced acetyl-TAG production is that the H1246+EaDAcT strain was more sensitive to these toxic compounds present in ACSH. Previously, we identified a wild S. cerevisiae diploid strain, NRRL YB-210, with tolerance to inhibitors in ACSH and other stress-inducing conditions [2628]. When engineered to express xylose reductase (XYL1), xylitol dehydrogenase (XYL2), and xylulokinase (XYL3) from Scheffersomyces stipitis, derivatives of this strain (GLBRCY2A) were able to convert xylose from synthetic lab media and ACSH into ethanol [27]. One haploid derivative of GLBRCY2A, named GLBRCY40 (referred to as Y40 from hereon), was selected for additional modification to produce acetyl-TAGs. First, we deleted DGA1, LRO1, ARE1, and ARE2 coding sequences from the genome of Y40 (4KO; Fig. 3), and then inserted an empty or EaDAcT-containing expression cassette into its genome (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Engineering of acetyl-TAG production in a wild S. cerevisiae strain. A haploid version of the xylose-metabolizing GLBRCY2A strain was engineered for reduced lcTAG production. The schematic diagram in the upper subpanel of (a) indicates the predicted sizes (in kb) of PCR products generated by primers specific for wild-type ARE1, ARE2, DGA1, and LRO1 or their corresponding marker-rescued deletions. Actual PCRs from the Y40 (WT) or Y40 strain containing all four deletions (4KO) are indicated alongside flanking DNA standards in the lower subpanel. PCR-verification of EaDAcT insertion into the genome of 4KO is shown in (b). A schematic diagram showing predicted products from the primers used is on the left. Actual PCR confirmation in the indicated strains is shown on the right

We first sought to determine whether our strain engineering had effects on TAG production. Deletion of DGA1, LRO1, ARE1, and ARE2 in our strain background did not significantly affect the cell growth on YPD aerobically (Additional file 1: Figure S1); this was also seen for other strain backgrounds possessing the same mutations [22]. Y40 and 4KO strains expressing EaDAcT (Y40+EaDAcT and 4KO+EaDAcT, respectively) also grew to similar maximum cell densities (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To determine whether the engineered strains were capable of synthesizing acetyl-TAGs, we isolated neutral lipids from the cultured cells and analyzed them with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS). In both the Y40 and 4KO backgrounds, peaks corresponding to the [M + NH4]+ masses of acetyl-TAG molecular species were detected in EaDAcT-integrated lines at both 18 and 48 h of culture growth (Fig. 4a). In Y40+EaDAcT, acetyl-TAGs comprised 78.5 mol% of the TAG content at 18 h; this level decreased to 56.0 mol% after 48 h of growth, even though the total amount of TAG remained the same (Fig. 4b). Importantly, deletion of the lcTAG-synthesizing enzymes increased the relative composition of acetyl-TAGs to 86 mol% at both 18 and 48 h in yeast expressing EaDAcT (Fig. 4b). Surprisingly, small but significant amounts of lcTAGs were also detected in the 4KO strains (Fig. 4a). Despite expression of EaDAcT, reduction of lcTAG synthesis also lowered the overall TAG content (including acetyl-TAGs) compared to the Y40+empty strain. This was particularly evident by 48 h when the total TAG content was 1.2 µg/mg DCW in the 4KO+EaDAcT strain compared to 3.6 µg/mg DCW from the Y40+EaDAcT strain. Together, these results confirm that the 4KO+EaDAcT strain produces enriched amounts of acetyl-TAGs, but is not completely deficient for lcTAG production.
Fig. 4

Xylose-enabled yeast strains expressing EaDAcT produce acetyl-TAGs. a ESI mass spectra of neutral lipid extracts from xylose-enabled yeast strains where known enzymes for TAG biosynthesis were knocked out and EaDAcT expressed after growth on YPD medium for 18 h. Acetyl-TAGs are highlighted in purple and lcTAGs in orange. Signal peaks possess the m/z value of the [M + NH4]+ adduct. For clarity, only the number of acyl carbons and not the number of double bonds (x) in each series of TAG molecular species is indicated. Tritridecanoin (tri13:0) is used as an ESI–MS external standard and tripentadecanoin (tri15:0) was added as an internal standard during lipid extraction. Quantification of lcTAG and acetyl-TAG content of different xylose-enabled yeast strains after 18 h (b) and 48 h (c) growth on YPD medium. Strains were either capable of normal lcTAG biosynthesis (WT) or possessed mutations in key biosynthetic genes (4KO) and had either EaDAcT or control sequence integrated. Values represent the mean ± SD of acetyl-TAG or lcTAG content derived from four different ESI–MS analyses and are representative of at least two replicate cultures

Acetyl-TAGs can be produced when xylose is used as a carbon source

The primary goal of this work was to determine if acetyl-TAGs could be produced from ACSH. At 6% glucan loading, ACSH contains approximately 30 g/L of xylose and represents almost a third of the total sugars. Thus, we first determined whether acetyl-TAGs could be produced from xylose in lab media. In general, xylose was utilized at a slower rate compared to glucose by all strains, with significant amounts remaining in the media after 48 h and resulting in slower growth (Additional file 1: Figure S2) compared to what was seen with glucose (Additional file 1: Figure S1). While acetyl-TAGs were produced under these conditions, their levels were considerably lower compared to growth with glucose (Fig. 5). For example, in the 4KO+EaDAcT strain, acetyl-TAGs were reduced to 54.6 mol% at 48 h (Fig. 5) compared to the 86 mol% composition observed after growth on YPD (Fig. 4b). These lower acetyl-TAG levels were due to not only reductions in the absolute quantities of acetyl-TAGs, but also to increased amounts of lcTAGs produced. Such increases were particularly evident in the Y40+empty and Y40+EaDAcT strains, which produced 7.0 and 4.9 µg lcTAG/mg DCW, respectively (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Acetyl-TAGs can be produced from xylose when used as a carbon source. Quantification of lcTAG and acetyl-TAG content of xylose-enabled strains with different combinations of altered lcTAG biosynthesis or EaDAcT expression grown on YPX for 48 h. Values represent the mean ± SD of acetyl-TAG or lcTAG content derived from four different ESI–MS analyses and are representative of at least two replicate cultures

Production of acetyl-TAG from lignocellulose-derived ACSH

We next compared the ability of the 4KO+EaDAcT strain to grow and produce acetyl-TAGs in YPDX and ACSH media. When grown on YPDX (with glucose and xylose at equivalent concentrations to that found in ACSH), the 4KO+EaDAcT strain accumulated 3.0 µg acetyl-TAG/mg DCW, twofold higher than the mutant H1246+EaDAcT strain, but also accumulated higher levels of lcTAGs (Table 1). The 4KO+EaDAcT strain produced less acetyl-TAGs in ACSH compared to YPDX (Fig. 6; Table 1), but generated over sixfold more acetyl-TAGs on a cell mass basis than the H1246+EaDAcT strain identically grown in ACSH. Importantly, the 4KO+EaDAcT grew at an almost fourfold faster rate in ACSH, resulting in a 24-fold higher volumetric acetyl-TAG titer than the H1246+EaDAcT strain (Table 1). While the SCY62+EaDAcT strain produced twofold higher titer of acetyl-TAGs on a per cell mass basis (2.2 mg/g DCW) than the 4KO+EaDAcT strain in ACSH, it also grew more slowly and therefore generated an almost sixfold lower volumetric titer (1.4 mg/L) than the 4KO+EaDAcT strain (7.9 mg/L; Table 1). This supports the idea that the 4KO strain background is more tolerant to inhibitors in ACSH than both the SCY62 and H1246 strains. These differences also translated into an improved acetyl-TAG composition of 48 mol % in the total TAG extracted from the 4KO+EaDAcT strain, compared to 31 mol% for the original SCY62+EaDAcT strain. In stationary phase (72 h) after glucose was completely consumed and when xylose and ethanol could be respired (Additional file 1: Figure S3), acetyl-TAG levels in the Y40 and 4KO strains significantly dropped to 19 and 32 mol%, respectively (Fig. 6b). Similar to the situation with YPX, high levels of lcTAGs were observed, particularly in the Y40 strain where 6.1 and 4.5 µg lcTAG/mg DCW were produced in control and EaDAcT-expressing cultures, respectively. Higher levels of lcTAGs were also observed in the 4KO background when grown on ACSH compared to YPD, but these were reduced compared to the Y40 strains (Figs. 4b, 6).
Fig. 6

Acetyl-TAGs are produced from engineered yeast grown on ACSH. Quantification of lcTAG and acetyl-TAG content of xylose-enabled strains with different combinations of altered lcTAG biosynthesis or EaDAcT expression grown on ACSH for 24 (a) or 72 (b) h. Values represent the mean ± SD of acetyl-TAG or lcTAG content derived from four different ESI–MS analyses and are representative of at least two replicate cultures

Discussion

Expression of the DAG acetyltransferase EaDAcT has been shown to be necessary and sufficient for the production of acetyl-TAGs in different transgenic plants, as well as in yeast [13, 14, 21]. Acetyl-TAGs possess unique and useful properties compared to regular lcTAGs and therefore represent useful molecules for a future biobased economy. Production of acetyl-TAGs from renewable biomass could further enhance the economic return. To this end, we engineered a stress-tolerant S. cerevisiae strain to express EaDAcT (4KO+EaDAcT), which enabled the generation of acetyl-TAGs from glucose in ACSH (Fig. 6). This contrasted what was seen with the H1246 laboratory strain, which did not generate any acetyl-TAGs from ACSH (Fig. 2b) and grew at a slower rate than in YPDX. We also found that the 4KO+EaDAcT strain grew faster than both SCY62 and H1246 strains, particularly in ACSH. This ultimately translated into a faster rate and higher volumetric titer of TAG production by the 4KO strain relative to the others. Although the 4KO+EaDAcT produced acetyl-TAGs from xylose in lab media (Fig. 5), it was unclear whether the strain generated acetyl-TAGs from xylose in ACSH. The reduction in acetyl-TAG levels in the stationary phase could be caused by a faster rate of acetyl-TAG catabolism compared to slower or absent rate of acetyl-TAG production from xylose. This inability to produce significant amounts of TAGs from xylose in ACSH may have resulted from cellular stress incurred by toxins present in ACSH. The effects of these toxins in ACSH on xylose conversion into ethanol have been seen in bacteria [23, 29] and yeast [25, 30]. Thus, while we accomplished our goal to generate acetyl-TAGs from lignocellulose, additional work is needed to utilize all of the sugars present in plant feedstocks.

Deletion of the four acyltransferases that synthesize lcTAGs greatly increased the relative acetyl-TAG composition produced by the engineered organism (Fig. 4). However, expression of EaDAcT failed to fully compensate for the elimination of these four enzymes. Under all media conditions, the 4KO+EaDAcT strain always produced less total TAG than Y40 cells also expressing EaDAcT. Further, when at stationary phase time points in both lab media (YPD and YPX) and ACSH, the 4KO+EaDAcT strain produced less total TAG than Y40 alone (Figs. 4b, 5 and 6b). These results are similar to what has been observed in Arabidopsis where the low oil content of the dgat1 mutant is not fully complemented by expression of EaDAcT [14]. Likewise, in Camelina sativa, suppression of endogenous lcTAG synthesis is associated with reduced oil content, despite the presence of EaDAcT [14, 21]. A number of non-exclusive mechanisms could explain why the expression of EaDAcT is unable to fully compensate for the elimination of most lcTAG biosynthesis, leading to a reduction in overall TAG content. One possibility is that the inability to synthesize lcTAGs leads to reduced fatty acid biosynthesis and a subsequent decrease in overall TAG accumulation. Similar effects have been noted in transgenic seeds engineered to produce unusual fatty acids. In these cases, a bottleneck in moving these unusual fatty acids from where they are synthesized on phosphatidylcholine (PC) to storage in TAGs leads to reduced fatty acid biosynthesis [31]. Alternatively, lcTAG biosynthesis appears to be carefully coordinated in yeast, with different enzymes more important at various growth phases. For example, PDAT activity is more important for lcTAG synthesis during exponential phase whereas DGAT2 activity predominates in stationary phase [32]. It is therefore possible that EaDAcT expression did not adequately match the coordinated response of up to four different promoters. Thus, the EaDAcT enzyme might not have been synthesized at the right levels and with the right timing to match the supply of available substrate. Further work is therefore needed to better elucidate the complex regulation that governs TAG accumulation in yeast, as well as in other organisms.

When the yeast cells were in stationary phase, acetyl-TAG levels decreased at late time points in the cultures. This was evident when the cells were grown on YPD and ACSH (Figs. 4, 6). We have also observed similar results when EaDAcT is expressed in the H1246 background [33]. Recent work has suggested that instead of being inert end product pools, storage lipids are quite metabolically active, with evidence for TAG remodeling [34]. Our observations are consistent with this idea. In the case of Y40, in which the endogenous lcTAG biosynthetic enzymes are present, acetyl-TAGs were replaced by lcTAGs by stationary phase (Figs. 4, 5, 6). In 4KO strains, acetyl-TAGs were removed but not replaced by lcTAGs. Optimizing the length of culture growth will therefore be important in maximizing acetyl-TAG production. In addition, future work could identify the presumed lipases responsible for the TAG turnover, in order to overcome the observed reductions in acetyl-TAG.

Contrary to what was seen in H1246 strain, the targeted deletion of the four genes encoding the enzymes responsible for lcTAG synthesis in S. cerevisiae Y40 background failed to completely eliminate the production of lcTAGs (Figs. 4, 6; Table 1). As the parent strain NRRL YB-210 is of a different genetic background than the S. cerevisiae quadruple knockout H1246 [22], it is possible that yet to be identified acyltransferases capable of synthesizing lcTAGs exist in this background. Similar situations have occurred when studying the synthesis of lcTAGs in other yeast species. For example, when elimination of the DGAT2 and PDAT orthologs in Yarrowia lipolytica failed to completely eliminate lcTAG production, a DGAT1 enzyme was found to be responsible for the residual activity [35]. Likewise, in Rhodotorula glutinis, a member of the soluble DGAT3 family synthesizes the lcTAGs found in this oleaginous yeast species [36]. LcTAGs were not detected in ACSH, and H1246 yeast expressing EaDAcT failed to synthesize lcTAGs when grown on ACSH and YPDX, indicating that the lcTAGs detected were synthesized de novo from the Y40-engineered yeast strains.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate that acetyl-TAGs could be synthesized in a yeast strain capable of growing on carbohydrates derived from lignocellulosic feedstocks at a faster rate than previously published strains. Deletion of four genes important for lcTAG synthesis in this background enhanced the purity of the acetyl-TAGs produced under all media conditions, but failed to completely eliminate the synthesis of this competing metabolite. Interestingly, lcTAG levels increased when grown on xylose-containing media. These results imply that this strain contains other enzymes capable of synthesizing lcTAGs and that additional work is needed to fully understand the synthesis of storage lipids when grown on different carbohydrate sources.

Methods

Media preparation

Standard yeast lab media (YP) were prepared with 10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone and 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 5.0 in double distilled H2O and sterile filtered. Solid plate media also contained 25 g/L agar. Lab media containing dextrose (YPD) or xylose (YPX) were prepared with 20 g/L dextrose or 20 g/L xylose, respectively, while YPDX media contained 60 g/L dextrose and 30 g/L xylose. AFEX corn stover hydrolysate (ACSH) from 6% glucan loading was prepared as described previously [30]. In brief, Zea mays (Pioneer hybrid 36H56) stover harvested in 2012 was AFEX pretreated and hydrolyzed with CTec2 and HTec2 enzymes (Novozymes). After 7 days, the hydrolysate was centrifuged and filtered. For strains transformed with plasmids, 200 μg/mL Hygromycin B (Life Technologies) was added to the media.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain and EaDAcT plasmid construction

Genotypes of S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are described in Additional file 1: Table S1. SCY62 and H1246 yeast strains have been described previously [22]. GLBRCY40 containing deletions of four known genes involved in lcTAG synthesis was generated from a haploid isolate of GLBRCY2A, a wild diploid S. cerevisiae strain engineered for xylose metabolism [27]. In brief, Y2A was sporulated in 1% potassium acetate for 10 days and individual tetrads dissected on YPD plates. Individual spores were then verified for a single mating type. One spore, named GLBRCY27D, was selected and subjected to kanMX marker rescue with pSH65 plasmid [37]. The resulting strain, Y40, was then transformed [38] with loxP-kanMX-loxP polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product amplified using Phusion polymerase (Thermo Fisher) and primers containing 45 bp DNA sequences flanking the DGA1 open reading frame. Confirmation of gene deletion by homologous recombination was performed by PCR of genomic DNA. The loxP-kanMX-loxP marker was rescued as described above. This process was repeated for subsequent deletions of LRO1, ARE2, and ARE1 to generate the Y40 are1Δ::loxP are2Δ::loxP dga1Δ::loxP lro1Δ::loxP quadruple knockout strain (4KO) with the loxP-KanMX marker rescued.

To generate acetyl-TAG-producing strains, the EaDAcT open reading frame (ORF) was codon optimized for S. cerevisiae and synthesized (GeneArt). The synthetic EaDAcT sequence was then inserted between the S. cerevisiae TEF1 promoter and TUB1 terminator of the pRS2μ-2gene plasmid. In brief, the pRS2μ-2gene plasmid contains 667 bp of the ACT1 promoter next to 350 bp of the TEF1 terminator, then 579 bp of the TEF1 promoter with 569 bp of the TUB1 terminator, followed by the loxP-hphMX4-loxP marker, inserted between the SacI to KpnI polylinker sites of pRS426 [39] lacking the URA3 marker. To integrate the expression cassette into the Y40 wild-type (WT) and 4KO strains, CYC1 terminator and HO-R [40] DNA sequences were inserted into the SacI and KpnI sites, respectively, of the pRS2μ-2gene empty or pRS2μ-2gene + EaDAcT plasmids. T3 and T7 primers were used to PCR amplify the CYC1 terminator-ACT1 promoter-TEF1 terminator-TEF1 promoter-EaDAcT ORF-TUB1 terminator-loxP-hphMX-loxP-HO-R cassette between the pRS2μ plasmid multi-cloning sites, which was then transformed into the Y40 WT or 4KO strains. Genome insertion of this cassette was verified by PCR. For SCY62 and H1246 strains, the pRS2μ-2gene + EaDAcT plasmid was transiently transformed and selected by addition of Hygromycin B to all media.

Yeast culturing experiments

All yeast growth experiments were performed in four 2.5 L vessel Parallel Bioreactor systems (DASGIP) or six 200 mL mini-Bioreactors with myControl controllers (Applikon Biotechnology). Vessels were sparged with air at 0.13 L/min for aerobic experiments. Inocula were prepared from single colonies grown in YPD media overnight at 30 °C. Cells were then centrifuged, the resulting cell pellet washed with YP media without sugars, and then resuspended in the same media as in the cell culture experiment. Strains were then inoculated into bioreactors to achieve a starting cell density of optical density of 0.1 at λ = 600 nm in a 1-cm path length cuvette spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter). Vessels were maintained at 30 °C and pH 5.0 by addition of NaOH or HCl and stirred with impeller speeds of 300 RPM. Cell densities during specified times of fermentation experiments were measured by optical density at 600 nm. Extracellular sugar concentrations were measured by a YSI 2700 instrument (YSI Inc.) and dry cell weight (DCW) determinations were performed as described elsewhere [30].

Quantification of TAGs from yeast

At specified times, 25–50 mL of yeast culture was removed from bioreactors and dispensed into 50-mL conical tubes. Cells were harvested when glucose was nearly or completely depleted from the media [18 or 24 h after inoculation for YPDX or ACSH, respectively; the differences in harvest time were due to growth rate differences in the two different media conditions (see Table 1)]. Harvested cultures were then centrifuged at 10,000 RCF at 4 °C for 5 min. Clarified media were decanted, cells were washed twice in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0), and the final cell pellet flash-frozen in dry ice-ethanol. Total lipids were extracted and neutral lipids isolated as described previously [13]. 50 n moles of tripentadecanoin (Nu-Check Prep) was added to each sample prior extraction. To quantify acetyl-TAGs and lcTAGs using ESI–MS, 1 µg of neutral lipids dissolved in 400 µL chloroform was mixed with 700 µL of methanol:300 mM ammonium acetate, 100:5.26 (v/v). 3 µL of 10 µM tritridecanoin internal standard was spiked into every sample prior to ESI-MS analysis. Neutral lipids were analyzed in positive ion mode using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer API 400 (Applied Biosystems) equipped with an ESI source. The samples were directly infused at 30 µL/min. Instrument setting for total ion scans was as follows: curtain gas, 20 (arbitrary units); ion source gases 1 and 2, 45 (arbitrary units), ion spray voltage, 5500 V; source temperature, 100 °C; declustering potential, 20 V; entrance potential, 10 V; and the interface heater, “on”. Spectra were acquired from 500 to 1000 m/z at 5 s per cycle for 40 cycles. Spectra were smoothed one time (3-point boxcar) with 0.4 for previous and next point weight and 1 for current point weight. The baseline was subtracted with a window of 20 u. Spectral data were processed and exported using the “MultiplePeriodProcessing” function provided by Analyst software (Applied Biosystems). Mass peaks corresponding to acetyl-TAG and lcTAG molecular species were deconvoluted for M + 2 and M + 4 isotopic overlap and corrected for isotopic variation using an inhouse script that utilizes the creation of isotopomer abundance matrixes [41]. Correction for the effect of the number of acyl chain carbons and double bonds on the signal strength was performed as previously described [42]. Acetyl-TAG and lcTAG abundances were normalized to that of the tripentadecanoin standard to correct for extraction efficiency.

Notes

Abbreviations

acetyl-TAGs: 

acetyl-triacylglycerols

ACETEM: 

acetic acid esters of mono- and diglycerides

ACSH: 

AFEX-pretreated corn stover hydrolysate

AFEX: 

ammonia fiber expansion

ESI–MS: 

electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

lcTAGs: 

long chain triacylglycerols

TAG: 

triacylglycerol

YPD: 

yeast extract peptone dextrose

YPDX: 

yeast extract peptone dextrose xylose

YPX: 

yeast extract peptone xylose

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

TKS and TPD designed the study and were responsible for data analysis, interpretation, and manuscript preparation. RJB, RAN, and LSP engineered yeast strains and executed fermentations. YZ designed fermentation experiments and produced ACSH. TNTT extracted and quantified lipids from yeast pellets for all experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jose Serate and Dan Xie for preparing bioreactors and sampling cultures, Mary Tremaine for technical support, and Tim Donohue, Bob Landick, John Ohlrogge and Mike Pollard for advice.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Award No. EPS-0903806 and matching support from the State of Kansas through the Kansas Board of Regents, and by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE Office of Science BER DE-FC02-07ER64494). The lipid analyses described in this work were performed at the Kansas Lipidomics Research Center Analytical Laboratory. Instrument acquisition and lipidomics method development was supported by National Science Foundation (EPS-0236913, MCB-1413036, DBI-0521587, DBI-1228622), Kansas Technology Enterprise Corporation, K-IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research Excellence (INBRE) of National Institute of Health (P20GM103418), and Kansas State University. This is contribution number 17-296-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Kansas State University
(2)
DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison

References

  1. Pauly M, Keegstra K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J. 2008;54:559–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kim SR, Park Y-C, Jin Y-S, Seo J-H. Strain engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced xylose metabolism. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:851–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kondo A, Ishii J, Hara KY, Hasunuma T, Matsuda F. Development of microbial cell factories for bio-refinery through synthetic bioengineering. J Biotechnol. 2013;163:204–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hong K-K, Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key cell factory platform for future biorefineries. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69:2671–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Matsuda F, Ishii J, Kondo T, Ida K, Tezuka H, Kondo A. Increased isobutanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by eliminating competing pathways and resolving cofactor imbalance. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Krivoruchko A, Serrano-Amatriain C, Chen Y, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Improving biobutanol production in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae by manipulation of acetyl-CoA metabolism. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40:1051–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee W-H, Seo S-O, Bae Y-H, Nan H, Jin Y-S, Seo J-H. Isobutanol production in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of 2-ketoisovalerate decarboxylase and valine biosynthetic enzymes. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2012;35:1467–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghiaci P, Norbeck J, Larsson C. 2-Butanol and butanone production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through combination of a b12 dependent dehydratase and a secondary alcohol dehydrogenase using a TEV-based expression system. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e102774.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. de Jong BW, Shi S, Valle-Rodríguez JO, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Metabolic pathway engineering for fatty acid ethyl ester production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using stable chromosomal integration. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;42:477–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lian J, Zhao H. Reversal of the β-oxidation cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of fuels and chemicals. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:332–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen L, Zhang J, Lee J, Chen WN. Enhancement of free fatty acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by control of fatty acyl-CoA metabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:6739–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Runguphan W, Keasling JD. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of fatty acid-derived biofuels and chemicals. Metab Eng. 2014;21:103–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Durrett TP, McClosky DD, Tumaney AW, Elzinga DA, Ohlrogge J, Pollard M. A distinct DGAT with sn-3 acetyltransferase activity that synthesizes unusual, reduced-viscosity oils in Euonymus and transgenic seeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:9464–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu J, Rice A, McGlew K, Shaw V, Park H, Clemente T, Pollard M, Ohlrogge J, Durrett TP. Metabolic engineering of oilseed crops top produce high levels of novel acetyl glyceride oils with reduced viscosity, freezing point and calorific value. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:858–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ryan TW, Dodge LG, Callahan TJ. The effects of vegetable oil properties on injection and combustion in 2 different diesel-engines. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1984;61:1610–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Durrett TP, Benning C, Ohlrogge J. Plant triacylglycerols as feedstocks for the production of biofuels. Plant J. 2008;54:593–607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaupp R, Adams W. Acid esters of mono- and diglycerides. In: Whitehurst RJ, editor. Emulsifiers in food technology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 59–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Coltro L, Pitta JB, Madaleno E. Performance evaluation of new plasticizers for stretch PVC films. Polym Test. 2013;32:272–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bagby MO, Smith CR Jr. Asymmetric triglycerides from Impatiens edgeworthii seed oil. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967;137:475–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleiman R, Miller RW, Earle FR, Wolff IA. (S)-1,2-diacyl-3-acetins: optically active triglycerides from Euonymus verrucosus seed oil. Lipids. 1967;2:473–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu J, Tjellström H, McGlew K, Shaw V, Rice A, Simpson J, Kosma D, Ma W, Yang W, Strawsine M, et al. Field production, purification and analysis of high-oleic acetyl-triacylglycerols from transgenic Camelina sativa. Ind Crop Prod. 2015;65:259–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandager L, Gustavsson MH, Stahl U, Dahlqvist A, Wiberg E, Banas A, Lenman M, Ronne H, Stymne S. Storage lipid synthesis is non-essential in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:6478–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Keating DH, Zhang Y, Ong IM, McIlwain S, Morales EH, Grass JA, Tremaine M, Bothfeld W, Higbee A, Ulbrich A, et al. Aromatic inhibitors derived from ammonia-pretreated lignocellulose hinder bacterial ethanologenesis by activating regulatory circuits controlling inhibitor efflux and detoxification. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarks C, Higbee A, Piotrowski J, Xue S, Coon JJ, Sato TK, Jin M, Balan V, Dale BE. Quantifying pretreatment degradation compounds in solution and accumulated by cells during solids and yeast recycling in the Rapid Bioconversion with Integrated recycling Technology process using AFEX™ corn stover. Bioresour Technol. 2016;205:24–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tang X, da Costa Sousa L, Jin M, Chundawat SP, Chambliss CK, Lau MW, Xiao Z, Dale BE, Balan V. Designer synthetic media for studying microbial-catalyzed biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:1–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wohlbach DJ, Kuo A, Sato TK, Potts KM, Salamov AA, LaButti KM, Sun H, Clum A, Pangilinan JL, Lindquist EA, et al. Comparative genomics of xylose-fermenting fungi for enhanced biofuel production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:13212–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Jin M, Sarks C, Gunawan C, Bice BD, Simonett SP, Avanasi Narasimhan R, Willis LB, Dale BE, Balan V, Sato TK. Phenotypic selection of a wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of AFEX™ pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:1–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wohlbach DJ, Rovinskiy N, Lewis JA, Sardi M, Schackwitz WS, Martin JA, Deshpande S, Daum CG, Lipzen A, Sato TK, et al. Comparative genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural isolates for bioenergy production. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6:2557–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Pisithkul T, Jacobson TB, O’Brien TJ, Stevenson DM, Amador-Noguez D. Phenolic amides are potent inhibitors of de novo nucleotide biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:5761–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Parreiras LS, Breuer RJ, Avanasi Narasimhan R, Higbee AJ, La Reau A, Tremaine M, Qin L, Willis LB, Bice BD, Bonfert BL, et al. Engineering and two-stage evolution of a lignocellulosic hydrolysate-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for anaerobic fermentation of xylose from AFEX pretreated corn stover. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107499.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bates PD, Johnson SR, Cao X, Li J, Nam J-W, Jaworski JG, Ohlrogge JB, Browse J. Fatty acid synthesis is inhibited by inefficient utilization of unusual fatty acids for glycerolipid assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:1204–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Oelkers P, Cromley D, Padamsee M, Billheimer JT, Sturley SL. The DGA1 Gene determines a second triglyceride synthetic pathway in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:8877–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bansal S, Durrett TP. Rapid Quantification of low-viscosity acetyl-triacylglycerols using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Lipids. 2016;51:1093–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rajakumari S, Grillitsch K, Daum G. Synthesis and turnover of non-polar lipids in yeast. Prog Lipid Res. 2008;47:157–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang H, Damude HG, Yadav NS. Three diacylglycerol acyltransferases contribute to oil biosynthesis and normal growth in Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast. 2012;29:25–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rani SH, Saha S, Rajasekharan R. A soluble diacylglycerol acyltransferase is involved in triacylglycerol biosynthesis in the oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula glutinis. Microbiology. 2013;159:155–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Güldener U, Heck S, Fiedler T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:2519–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protocols. 2007;2:31–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989;122:19–27.Google Scholar
  40. Voth WP, Richards JD, Shaw JM, Stillman DJ. Yeast vectors for integration at the HO locus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee WNP, Byerley LO, Bergner EA, Edmond J. Mass isotopomer analysis: theoretical and practical considerations. Biol Mass Spectrom. 1991;20:451–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bates PD, Durrett TP, Ohlrogge JB, Pollard M. Analysis of acyl fluxes through multiple pathways of triacylglycerol synthesis in developing soybean embryos. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:55–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement