Skip to main content

Engineering Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius for direct utilisation of holocellulose from wheat straw



A consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), where lignocellulose is converted into the desired product(s) in a single fermentative step without the addition of expensive degradative enzymes, represents the ideal solution of renewable routes to chemicals and fuels. Members of the genus Geobacillus are able to grow at elevated temperatures and are able to utilise a wide range of oligosaccharides derived from lignocellulose. This makes them ideally suited to the development of CBP.


In this study, we engineered Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955 to utilise lignocellulosic biomass, in the form of nitric acid/ammonia treated wheat straw to which expensive hydrolytic enzymes had not been added. Two different strains, BZ9 and BZ10, were generated by integrating the cglT (β-1,4-glucosidase) gene from Thermoanaerobacter brockii into the genome, and localising genes encoding different cellulolytic enzymes on autonomous plasmids. The plasmid of strain BZ10 carried a synthetic cellulosomal operon comprising the celA (Endoglucanase A) gene from Clostridium thermocellum and cel6B (Exoglucanase) from Thermobifida fusca; whereas, strain BZ9 contained a plasmid encoding the celA (multidomain cellulase) gene from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii. All of the genes were successfully expressed, and their encoded products secreted in a functionally active form, as evidenced by their detection in culture supernatants by Western blotting and enzymatic assay. In the case of the C. bescii CelA enzyme, this is one of the first times that the heterologous production of this multi-functional enzyme has been achieved in a heterologous host. Both strains (BZ9 and BZ10) exhibited improved growth on pre-treated wheat straw, achieving a higher final OD600 and producing greater numbers of viable cells. To demonstrate that cellulosic ethanol can be produced directly from lignocellulosic biomass by a single organism, we established our consortium of hydrolytic enzymes in a previously engineered ethanologenic G. thermoglucosidasius strain, LS242. We observed approximately twofold and 1.6-fold increase in ethanol production in the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius equivalent to BZ9 and BZ10, respectively, compared to G. thermoglucosidasius LS242 strain at 24 h of growth.


We engineered G. thermoglucosidasius to utilise a real-world lignocellulosic biomass substrate and demonstrated that cellulosic ethanol can be produced directly from lignocellulosic biomass in one step. Direct conversion of biomass into desired products represents a new paradigm for CBP, offering the potential for carbon neutral, cost-effective production of sustainable chemicals and fuels.


The sustainable production of chemicals and fuels from lignocellulosic biomass using microbial fermentation requires its deconstruction into simple sugars. This conversion is dependent on an initial pre-treatment step followed by the addition of hydrolytic enzymes. Pre-treatment can be accomplished using a variety of methods such as biological, chemical, mechanical and thermal processes, either alone or in combination [1, 2]. The subsequent complete hydrolysis of the cellulose in pre-treated biomass into glucose, however, requires the synergetic action of at least three types of glycoside hydrolases (GHs) that belong to different sequence-based families, as classified in the Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme database (CAZy) [3]. Endoglucanases hydrolyse internal bonds in the cellulose, generating short polymers which provide the substrate for cellobiohydrolases (or exoglucanases). These act in a unidirectional manner, either from non-reducing or reducing ends of cellulose polysaccharide chains, liberating cellobiose as the major product. Lastly, β-glucosidases convert cellobiose into glucose, relieving the system from end product inhibition [4]. The relative expense of pre-treatment steps, coupled with high cost of hydrolytic enzymes, has made the development of cost-effective strategies to produce chemicals and fuels from biomass very challenging.

One solution to improve the economics is consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), in which lignocellulose is converted into products in one step without added enzymes. In essence, CBP represents the simultaneous enzyme-mediated saccharification and fermentation of biomass into desired products by a single microorganism. Although, no natural microorganism possesses all of the desired features of CBP, certain bacteria and fungi possess at least some of the properties required [5,6,7]. Of particular interest are thermophilic microorganisms because of the following features: (i) they produce thermostable enzymes that can survive under the required harsh, bioprocessing conditions [8]; (ii) they grow at high temperatures that promotes higher rates of feedstock conversion [9]; (iii) the risk of contamination is eliminated at higher processing temperatures, which also reduce viscosity of substrate and product streams [10, 11], and; (iv) high temperature assists product removal and recovery, potentially lowering separation cost [12]. Among the thermophiles, the anaerobic, cellulolytic organism Clostridium thermocellum is one of the most extensively researched CBP organisms and effectively degrades cellulose using a multiprotein complex called the cellulosome. In its wild-type form, C. thermocellum is unable to catabolize pentose sugars resulting from the hydrolysis of hemicellulose, thereby reducing the overall biomass conversion. Its low ethanol tolerance also limits the levels of this biofuel that can be produced [6, 13,14,15]. Other hemicellulose-utilising thermophilic microorganisms belonging to the genus, Thermoanaerobacterium and Thermoanaerobacter, have been developed as a CBP organism but are similarly limited in ethanol yields [16,17,18]. Recently, an extremely cellulolytic, thermophilic organism, Caldicellulosiruptor bescii, was engineered to produce an ethanol [19]. Although an important step towards establishing C. bescii as a platform for CBP, the high (78 °C) optimum growth temperature of C. bescii present a number of challenges to further metabolic engineering the organism for extend product range. These include the existence of a very limited number of antibiotics that are stable above 50 °C, and the lack of available genetic tools [20, 21].

Members of the genus Geobacillus are moderate thermophiles (optimum growth temperature is 55–60 °C) that have also been promoted as potential platforms for CBP. They can grow to a high cell density and can utilise a wide range of polymeric or short oligomeric carbohydrates for growth [22]. Importantly, in recent years, genetic tools have been developed that have enabled them to be engineered to improve the production of natural products, such as ethanol [23,24,25,26], as well as non-native products, such as isobutanol [27]. However, while most of the Geobacillus spp. can effectively degrade hemicellulose, they are unable to break down crystalline or the amorphous cellulose [28], despite their possession of numerous endoglucanases and endoxylanases [29,30,31]. This has led to the introduction of heterologous cellulase genes [32, 33] but the encoded GHs were only shown to be active against synthetic substrates such as carboxy-methyl cellulose (CMC), phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose (PASC) and xylan. The introduction of GHs that are better able to degrade natural cellulosic substrate is essential if Geobacillus is to form the basis of CBP.

The standard commercial cellulosic enzyme cocktails for biomass deconstruction contains cellobiohydrolase/exoglucanases I (CBH I), cellobiohydrolase/exoglucanases II (CBH II) and β-glucosidase that act synergistically to release sugars for microbial conversion to products [34]. We, thus, anticipated that G. thermoglucosidasius recombinant strains endowed with the ability to produce an enzyme cocktail that could mimic the activity of the above would be potentially able to breakdown hemicellulose/cellulose and support growth of organism. Accordingly, in the present study, G. thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955 was endowed with the necessary thermostable exoglucanase, endoglucanase and β-glucosidase activities to allow its growth on pre-treated wheat straw that had received no enzymatic treatment (Fig. 1). Having established these defined modifications supported growth on a natural cellulosic substrate, they were introduced into a strain previously engineered for ethanol production. This enabled the one-step production of ethanol from the lignocellulose using single recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains, representing a significant step towards the generation of a platform for CBP.

Fig. 1

Engineering G. thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955 for utilisation of lignocellulosic biomass. a The endoglucanase (CtCelA/CbCelA) acts on the low-crystallinity part of the cellulose fibre and create free chain-ends. The exoglucanases (Cel6B/CbCelA) then degrade the sugar chain by removing cellobiose units (dimers of glucose) from the free chain-ends. The released cellobiose units are finally hydrolyzed by β-glucosidases (CglT), releasing glucose. b The schematic illustrations of two strains, BZ9 and BZ10 containing chromosomally integrated cglT (β-1,4-glucosidase) gene from Thermoanaerobacter brockii. Strain BZ9 has a synthetic cellulosomal operon comprising CtcelA (Endoglucanase A) gene from Clostridium thermocellum, Ribosome binding site (RBS), Signal peptide (SP) and cel6B (Exoglucanase) from Thermobifida fusca heterologously expressed on a replicating plasmid having two origin of replications for Gram-negative (−ve rep) and Gram-positive (+ve Rep) bacteria under the constitutive strong promoter Pldh. Strain BZ10 contains CbcelA (cellulase comprises a glycoside hydrolase family 9 and a family 48 catalytic domain) gene from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii on a replicating plasmid


Heterologous expression of extracellular GHs

The codon-optimised CtcelA, cel6B and CbcelA genes from C. thermocellum, T. fusca YX and C. bescii, respectively, were cloned into the G. thermoglucosidasius expression vector pMTLgSlimS under the transcriptional control of constitutive Pldh promoter, and the resulting plasmids, pMTLgSlimS–CtcelA, pMTLgSlimS–cel6B and pMTLgSlimS–CbcelA were transformed into G. thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955. The extracellular CtCelA, Cel6B and CbCelA were produced along with their native secretion signals containing a FLAG-epitope at the carboxy-terminus.

To examine CtCelA production and its endoglucanase activity, single recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius colonies, as well as the wild-type strain, were tested for CMC hydrolysis on appropriate agar media. The clear zone around the recombinant strains demonstrated that CMC hydrolysis as a result of the secretion of endoglucanase was occurring. In contrast, parent strain lacked any activity by the same measure (Fig. 2a). To analyze the expression of CtCelA, Cel6B and CbCelA in recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains, anti-FLAG M2-peroxidase (HRP) antibody antibody was used in Western blots of concentrated culture supernatants collected every hour until the stationary phase of growth (OD600 > 7). The heterologous CtCelA protein at an estimated molecular weight of 50 kDa was clearly visible in the 100-fold concentrated supernatant after 3 h, reaching a maximum in 5 h. No such band was observed in the supernatant derived from the wild-type strain (Fig. 2b). An electrophoretic band that bound to the anti-FLAG antibodies equivalent to a protein of 65 kDa was evident in the supernatants derived from both the recombinant and wild-type strains suggesting that strain NCIMB 11955 contains a polypeptide that also binds to the anti-FLAG-antibody used. A few weak bands of a size smaller than 50 kDa were also apparent in the recombinant strain but absent in wild type. It is possible that this was due to degradation of CtCelA protein in extracellular medium.

Fig. 2

Expression of heterologous GHs by recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains. The concentrated supernatants from wild type as well as recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains expressing GHs either CtCelA or Cel6B or CbCelA were separated in SDS-PAGE and extracellular heterologous GHs at the indicated time points (2–9 h) were detected by Western blotting using ANTI-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody-horseradish peroxidise conjugate. WT represents concentrated supernatant from wild-type strain of G. thermoglucosidasius at 8 h; M represents the pre-stained protein ladder (10–250 kDa). Expected molecular mass of the proteins are indicated by red arrows. a Congo red-stained TSA-CMC agar plate streaked with recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius expressing CtCelA enzyme (zone C1, C2, C3) and wild-type strain (zone WT). b Western blot showing the 100-fold concentrated supernatants from recombinant strain expressing the 50 kDa CtCelA. c CMCase specific activity of extracellular fraction of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius expressing CtCelA and wild-type G. thermoglucosidasius strains (WT). d Western blot showing the 100-fold concentrated supernatants from recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius expressing the 60 kDa Cel6B. e RACase specific activity of extracellular fraction of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius expressing Cel6B and G. thermoglucosidasius wild-type (WT) strains. f Western blot showing the 200-fold concentrated supernatants of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius expressing the 193 kDa CbCelA. g CMCase and h RACase specific activity of extracellular fraction of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius CbCelA and wild-type G. thermoglucosidasius strains (WT). P values were calculated by student’s t test and results are shown as mean ± SEM of three biological replicates

Cell growth is often inhibited because of the metabolic burden imposed by the expression of heterologous protein genes [35]. However, in the present study, the growth profile of the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains harbouring plasmid pMTLgSlimS–CtcelA was similar to that of wild type (Additional file 1: Figure S1). CMCase/endoglucanase activity of the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains expressing CtCelA was found to be 15.6 ± 1 μmol min−1 mg−1 of protein confirming that the protein is functional (Fig. 2c).

The presence of recombinant Cel6B protein of an estimated molecular weight of 60 kDa was confirmed from the Western blotting of 100-fold concentrated supernatant derived from recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius harbouring plasmid pMTLgSlimS-cel6B (Fig. 2d). This observation confirmed the successful expression and secretion of Cel6B. To assess the exoglucanase activity of the heterologously produced Cel6B, enzyme assays using RAC (Regenerated Phosphoric Acid-Swollen Cellulose) as substrate were performed. From this, specific activity of Cel6B was estimated to be 0.0135 ± 0.003 μmol min−1 mg−1 of protein. No measurable activity was detected in supernatants derived from the wild type (Fig. 2e).

To confirm the full-length expression of CbCelA protein, 200-fold concentrated supernatant was analysed. Using Western Blotting and anti-FLAG antibodies, we detected a protein with an estimated molecular mass of 193 kDa in the supernatant of the recombinant Geobacillus culture after 4 h of growth. This corresponded to the estimated molecular weight of CbCelA and confirmed the successful production of this glycosyl hydrolase in a soluble form (Fig. 2f). Although the calculated molecular mass of CbCelA protein is 193 kDa, other studies have found that the native protein from C. bescii migrates on SDS-PAGE at an apparent molecular weight of 230 kDa as a consequence of the glycosylation of native enzyme [36, 37]. However, our results showed a band size of 193 kDa indicating the absence of glycosylation in the heterologously expressed CbCelA protein. Endoglucanase and exoglucanase functionality assays of the recombinant enzyme produced in Geobacillus indicated that specific activity of CbCelA against CMC and RAC was 0.735 ± 0.07 and 0.0831 ± 0.006 μmol min−1 mg−1 of protein, respectively, suggesting that CbCelA protein is functional (Fig. 2g, h).

In total, all the three enzymes (CtCelA, Cel6B and CbCelA) were, therefore, produced successfully in their soluble form in the G. thermoglucosidasius chassis, with measurable enzyme activity.

Genome integration of the cglT gene to improve cellobiose utilisation

The G. thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955 genome sequence contains an operon encoding a predicted cellobiose specific phosphotransferase system (PTS) followed by a gene annotated as β-1,4-glucosidase indicating that the organism can grow on cellobiose. However, the β-glucosidase operon is tightly regulated by G. thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955, which leads to low production of enzymes and inefficient degradation of cellobiose. Accumulation of this disaccharide results in feedback inhibition of many exo- and endo-glucanases [38, 39]. To ensure the maximum rate of cellobiose conversion to glucose, an additional β-glucosidase gene (cglT from T. brockii) was integrated into the chromosome of G. thermoglucosidasius via ACE (Allele-Coupled Exchange) [26]. Integration of the cglT at the pyrE locus was achieved by transforming plasmid pMTLgSlimS–LS3–cglT into electro-competent cells of a ∆pyrE deletion mutant of G. thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955 and subsequentially selecting for uracil prototrophs [26]. Prototrophic colonies were further screened for the presence of the correctly integrated PldhcglT cassette by colony-PCR analysis using oligonucleotide primers pyrE_C1_F and pyrE_C2_R which anneal to the genomic sequences up- and downstream of the pyrE locus. Correct integration of the PldhcglT cassette should result in the amplification of a DNA fragment of 3.8 kb in size; while in the case of the parental strain, the same primers generate a 2.0-kb fragment. All clones tested were found to generate the expected 3.8-kb fragment (Additional file 1: Figure S2) confirming the integration of cglT gene into the chromosome. The recombinant, integrant strain obtained was designated G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt.

To investigate the expression and functionality of intracellular CglT in G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt, 80 µg of total protein from a cell-free extract (CFE) was resolved on SDS-PAGE followed by anti-FLAG-tag mediated detection of protein by Western blotting. A distinct protein band estimated to be 50 kDa in size, corresponding to the predicted molecular mass of CglT protein, was observed in supernatants derived from the integrant strain (Fig. 3a). An equivalently size protein was absent in supernatants derived from the wild-type strain. Further, a CFE of G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt expressing cglT gene showed β-glucosidase activity of 1.21 ± 0.07 μmol min−1 mg−1 of protein against the colorimetric substrate pNPG (4-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside) at 60 °C (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3

Intracellular expression of CglT enhanced cellobiose utilisation. a Western blot showing FLAG-tagged CglT using ANTI-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody-horseradish peroxidise conjugate. Lane Wt. and CglT represents soluble fraction of cell lysate from wild-type G. thermoglucosidasius and the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt strain, respectively. Lane M is pre-stained protein ladder (10–250 kDa); Expected molecular mass of 50 kDa for CglT is indicated by red arrow. b pNPGase specific activity of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt strains (ZB3bInt) and wild-type G. thermoglucosidasius strains (WT). P values were calculated by student’s t test and results are shown as mean ± SEM of three biological replicates. c Cellobiose consumption and growth profiles by recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt (ZB3bInt) and wild-type G. thermoglucosidasius strains (WT) when grown on 3.0% cellobiose as the carbon source at 55 °C. Black circles, G. thermoglucosidasius_ZB3bInt (OD600 nm); Red circles, wild-type (OD600 nm); blue square, G. thermoglucosidasius_Zb3bInt (remaining cellobiose); green squares, wild-type (remaining cellobiose). Results are shown as mean ± SEM of three biological replicates

To determine if the integration of cglT gene can enhance cellobiose utilisation, the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt and wild-type strains were grown at 55 °C in ASYE-modified medium supplemented with 30 g/l of cellobiose (87.7 mM) as the sole carbon source. Cellobiose consumption and growth profiles showed that recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt strains utilised 100% of cellobiose available compared to the wild-type strain which utilised only 45 ± 0.02% of total cellobiose after 10 h of growth (Fig. 3c). Although the recombinant ZB3bInt strain exhibited a slight lag in growth compared to wild type in the early exponential phase of growth, after 7 h, its cell density increased significantly and had reached a much higher OD600 at the stationary phase of growth than the wild type (Fig. 3c). These results suggest that the addition of the heterologous cglT gene significantly enhanced the ability of G. thermoglucosidasius to utilise cellobiose, justifying the use of ZB3bInt as the background strain for the introduction of heterologous exo- and endo-glucanases.

Assembled GHs enable G. thermoglucosidasius to grow on pre-treated wheat straw

To develop G. thermoglucosidasius chassis expressing all the enzymes encoding endoglucanase, exoglucanase and β-glucosidase for complete degradation of cellulose, pMTLgSlimS–CbcelA and pMTLgSlimS–CtcelAcel6B plasmids were individually transformed into electro-competent cells of G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt (expressing the integrated cglT), thereby generating recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strain BZ9 and BZ10, respectively. The combined effect of GHs for the degradation of pre-treated wheat straw was investigated by analysing the growth of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9 and BZ10 with the recombinant strains expressing only either CtCelA or Cel6B or CbCelA, along with wild type as a control. Pre-treated wheat straw was prepared in a two-step process using nitric acid followed by ammonia at the DBT-ICT 2G (Department of Biotechnology—Institute of Chemical Technology Second Generation) Ethanol Demonstration Facility and was kindly gifted by ICT, Mumbai for the study (Additional file 1: Figure S3). It is composed of 85.15% cellulose and 4.35% xylose of the total carbohydrates, as reported in the patent [40]. Cultures of the two recombinant strains BZ9 and BZ10, alongside the wild-type and ZB3bInt controls, prepared in ASYE-modified medium supplemented with 10 g/l pre-treated wheat straw, were grown at 55 °C for approximately 100 h. No growth difference was observed between wild-type and ZB3bInt strains; hence, the wild-type data are included in Fig. 4. Estimates of the number of viable cells present were made throughout growth by counting the number of colony forming units (CFU) obtained when serially dilutions were plated on TSA agar plates. The CFU obtained after 12 h of growth from strain BZ9 was twofold higher compared to strain expressing only CbCelA (Fig. 4a); while, a threefold difference was seen with BZ10 compared to the strains expressing either only CtCelA (strain ZB1b) or Cel6B (strain ZB9a) (Fig. 4b). These results strongly suggest that the combined action of GHs; CtCelA, Cel6B, CglT, and CbCelA has resulted in the production of sufficient simple sugars from pre-treated wheat straw to support improved cell growth and biomass accumulation in recombinant strains BZ9 and BZ10.

Fig. 4

Growth of engineered strains on pre-treated wheat straw. Colony forming units (CFU) were measured after growing recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains on pre-treated wheat straw for 12 h. a CFU comparison of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius expressing only CbCelA (strain ZB6d) with G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9 strain expressing CglT and CbCelA. b CFU comparison of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ10 strain expressing CglT, Cel6B and CtCelA with G. thermoglucosidasius expressing only either CtCelA or Cel6B. P**  0.01, P*** ≤ 0.0001 were calculated by one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. c Growth curve of recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9 and BZ10 strains on 1% pre-treated wheat straw as a sole carbon source, with wild-type G. thermoglucosidasius served as a control. Results are shown as mean ± SEM of three biological replicates

Overall, the recombinant BZ9 and BZ10 strains exhibited higher growth than the wild type which was sustained during the whole 96-h period monitored. Although during the first 6 h of growth phase, the rate of growth of the wild type appeared to be greater than BZ9 and BZ10, the wild-type cell density decreased drastically after 8 h, suggesting that the initial growth was supported by the small amount of xylose presented in pre-treated wheat straw. Once this had been consumed, wild-type G. thermoglucosidasius could not sustain growth further, as evidenced by the rapid decline in OD600. While the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9 and BZ10 strains showed a longer lag phase up until the 6-h time point, they went on to achieve a much higher OD600, peaking after the 16-h time point after which there was a gradual decline (Fig. 4c).

To confirm that the recombinant BZ9 and BZ10 strains degrade pre-treated wheat straw by producing GHs, cultures were serially diluted at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of growth and then plated on TSA-CMC plates. We observed a greater number of colonies, as well as clear zones, on Congo red-stained plates up to the 96-h timepoint in the samples derived from the recombinant BZ9 and BZ10 cultures compared to the wild-type control, where there were less colonies and no indication of CMC degradation. These data confirmed that the recombinant cultures were producing active endoglucanases (CtCelA/CbCelA) (Additional file 1: Figure S4). In addition, we found measurable cellobiohydrolase activity against chromogenic substrate pNPC only in the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9 and BZ10 strains, confirming the integrity of Cel6B and CbCelA. The specific activity at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of growth was 0.0279 ± 0.002, 0.0255 ± 0.003, 0.020 ± 0.001 and 0.0187 ± 0.002 μmol min−1 mg−1 of protein in G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9; in G. thermoglucosidasius BZ10, the activities were 0.0308 ± 0.01, 0.0226 ± 0.002, 0.0216 ± 0.002, 0.186 ± 0.002 μmol min−1 mg−1 of protein, respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S5a, b). Overall, these data demonstrated that the two engineered G. thermoglucosidasius strains, BZ9 and BZ10, were capable of degrading pre-treated wheat straw as the sole carbon source without the addition of any hydrolytic enzymes.

Engineering the bioethanol producing G. thermoglucosidasius LS242 for biomass utilisation

To demonstrate that cellulosic ethanol can be produced directly from lignocellulosic biomass by a single organism, we next established our consortium of hydrolytic enzymes in a previously engineered ethanologenic G. thermoglucosidasius strain, LS242 (∆ldh, pdhup, ∆pfl) [26] and tested the ability of the resultant strain to utilise pre-treated wheat straw. To achieve this, cglT was integrated into the pyrE locus of the G. thermoglucosidasius LS242 genome using ACE. This was accomplished as before, through the electrotransformation of LS242 with the plasmid pMTLgSlimS–LS3–cglT into G. thermoglucosidasius LS004, a ∆pyrE deletion mutant of LS242, and selecting for uracil prototrophs. Prototrophic colonies were then screened by colony-PCR analysis using primers pyrE_C1_F and pyrE_C2_R. Correct integration of the PldhcglT cassette resulted in the amplification of an expected 3.8-kb product size. Sanger sequencing further confirmed the presence of the predicted nucleotide sequence and the strain was designated G. thermoglucosidasius BZ242. Subsequently, to construct ethanologenic as well as cellulolytic strains, pMTLgSlimS–CbcelA and pMTLgSlimS–CtcelAcel6B plasmids were individually transformed into electro-competent cells of G. thermoglucosidasius BZ242, thereby generating recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains BZ243 and BZ244, respectively.

To investigate the production of ethanol from pre-treated wheat straw using the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains BZ243 and BZ244, together with the engineered ethanologenic G. thermoglucosidasius strain LS242 (∆ldh, pdhup, ∆pfl) as a control, microaerobic fermentations were carried out as previously described [26]. Culture supernatants from these strains were used for measurement of ethanol production by HPLC at growth time points of 24, 48 and 72 h. We observed approximately twofold (4.2-mM ethanol) and 1.6-fold (3.7-mM ethanol) increase in ethanol production in the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ243 and BZ244 strains, respectively, compared to G. thermoglucosidasius LS242 strain (2-mM ethanol) at 24 h of growth. G. thermoglucosidasius LS242 strain produced 2-mM ethanol from wheat straw, most likely as a consequence of consumption of xylose present in pre-treated wheat straw. The levels of ethanol in these cultures remained constant up to 48 h and then gradually declined due to the volatile nature of ethanol at temperatures of 55 °C (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Time course profile for production of ethanol from pre-treated wheat straw by recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ243, BZ244 and LS242 strains. P**  ≤ 0.01, P**  ≤ 0.001, P***  ≤ 0.0001 were calculated by 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Results are shown as mean ± SEM of three biological replicates


The goal of the study described here was to establish the principle of cellulolytic CBP chassis based on the thermophile G. thermoglucosidasius. To that end, we first equipped the otherwise non-cellulolytic, G. thermoglucosidasius wild-type strain with the ability to produce heterologous endoglucanase, exoglucanase and β-glucosidase and demonstrated that the engineered recombinant strains were capable of acquiring carbon and energy from pre-treated wheat straw for growth and accumulation of biomass. We then applied this strategy to an engineered ethanologenic G. thermoglucosidasius strain, allowing ethanol to be produced directly from lignocellulosic biomass in one step in a single organism.

Based on reported thermophilic activities and properties, the following enzymes were selected to create a cellulolytic G. thermoglucosidasius: C. thermocellum CtCelA (endoglucanase); T. fusca Cel6B (exoglucanase); C. bescii CbCelA (endo and exo-glucanase) and T. brockii CglT (β-glucosidases). CtCelA is a thermophilic, cellulosomal enzyme belonging to GH8 family encoding a polypeptide of 488 amino acids, consisting of a signal peptide, a catalytic domain and a C-terminal dockering domain [41]. Cel6B has a similar activity to the fungal T. reesei exocellulase Cel6A, but with higher thermostability (optimal activity at 60 °C) and a much broader pH optimum. Its catalytic domain is linked via a linker-peptide to a carbohydrate binding module 2 (CBM2) at N-terminus, which confines the substrate and appears to modulate the activities or properties of the catalytic core [42]. CbCelA is a large multimodular enzyme complex containing N-terminal endo-β-1,4-glucanase domain belonging to GH9, three CBM3 domains and a C-terminal GH48 exo-β-1,4-glucanase domain. At elevated temperatures, CbCelA enzyme activity towards its crystalline substrate (avicel) has been reported to be seven times as high as that of the common exo- and endo-cellulase standard mixture, Cel7A and Cel5A [43, 44]. CglT encoding β-glucosidases is an intracellular protein belonging to GH1 family and studies have shown that it has a high glucose tolerance as well as thermostability [45].

Heterologous expression of the GH enzymes was under the control of the well-established promoter (Pldh) of the G. stearothermophilus ldh gene [23], while secretion was aided by native signal peptides identified on the cellulases used. The extracellular GHs were successfully expressed as soluble, functional proteins, including the full-length CbCelA from C. bescii. CbCelA has been prominent in GH research since its discovery as it effectively degrades the high as well as low-crystallinity substrates [43]. However, so far its production has only been possible in its native host and in a mesophilic heterologous host, E. coli [46, 47]. The production of secreted and full-length functional CbCelA in G. thermoglucosidasius is, therefore, one of the first time in a thermophile that heterologous production of this multi-functional enzyme has been achieved. Nevertheless, despite the employment of a strong promoter, visible detection of a protein band via Western blot required a 100-fold concentration of G. thermoglucosidasius culture supernatant. One possible reason for this might be that the signal peptides used were native to C. bescii and not optimal for secretion in the host of G. thermoglucosidasius [48, 49]. Alternatively, as reported in Bacillus species [50,51,52], heterologous proteins are more susceptible to proteolysis by extracellular proteases. Interestingly, the level of CbCelA protein produced was lower than that observed with CtCelA and Cel6B despite the fact that the encoded genes were expressed from the same, Pldh promoter. It has been shown that in C. bescii, CbCelA is extensively glycosylated when expressed extracellularly, either as a requirement for protein translocation, or as a necessary post translational modification to shield the complex architecture of CbCelA against proteases [47]. It is probable that such a mechanism is lacking in Geobacillus resulting in lower levels of expression or higher level of protease cleavage once the protein is produced and secreted. Furthermore, the high prevalence of proline–threonine–serine regions found in the linkers between the CBM domains in CbCelA might also be more susceptible to proteolysis, contributing to lower expression levels [37].

Significant enzyme activities were obtained for all the heterologous expressed GH enzymes without concentrating the culture supernatant. For CtCelA and Cel6B, a specific activity of 15 and 0.0135 µmol min−1 mg−1 of protein was observed against their model substrate CMC and RAC, respectively. Finally, for CbCelA, both endo- and exo-glucanase activities were confirmed as evident by the degradation of model substrates, CMC and RAC (0.735 ± 0.07 and 0.0831 ± 0.006 μmol min−1 mg−1 of protein, respectively). It is notable that the exoglucanase activity of CbCelA was more than sevenfold higher compared to Cel6B, despite a much lower protein expression level as detected by Western blotting. This might be due to the fact that CbCelA enzyme has three CBM domains; while Cel6B has only one, which is reported to enhance the activity towards the substrates [53,54,55]. Several studies have reported the heterologous expression of cellulases in bacteria, fungi and yeast. However, the production of heterologous cellulases in heterologous hosts can be affected by numerous factors, including conditions of growth, heterologous secretion and the optimum temperature and pH at which the enzymes are active [56,57,58]. In the present study, although assays of the enzymes CtCelA, Cel6B and CbCelA were undertaken under conditions (pH 6.0 and temperature 60 °C) that were within the optimal temperature and pH ranges of these cellulases [37, 59], specific activities were low. This was most likely a consequence of using crude supernatants as opposed to purified enzymes.

For the intracellular CglT, a significant level of protein expression was observed on Western blotting despite the chromosomal location of the gene in G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3bInt. It is apparent from previous studies that during cellulose saccharification, cellobiose accumulation causes feedback inhibition against many exo- and endo-glucanases [60] and can often be the rate-limiting step in the hydrolytic process. Although, most of the Geobacillus species possess the ability to transport and metabolise disaccharides, oligosaccharides, sugar alcohols and sugar acids, G. thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955 is known to utilise cellobiose [28, 32]. However, the expression of β-glucosidase genes is invariably tightly regulated and controlled via several global regulators in most microorganisms and is often maintained in a silent state in the absence of cellobiose or other disaccharides [61,62,63]. As a consequence, cellobiose is utilised inefficiently. In our study, we demonstrated that the integration of CglT encoding β-glucosidase in the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius ZB3Int strain led to complete degradation of 30 g/l cellobiose in 10 h; whereas, the wild-type strain failed to completely utilise the cellobiose provided.

In the present study, the exo–endo-glucanase properties of CtCelA plus Cel6B and CbCelA were combined with the β-glucosidase activity of CglT in recombinant strains BZ9 and BZ10, respectively. The growth of both strains on pre-treated wheat straw was considerably improved compared to wild type, although an initial lag phase was observed. The latter is plausible due to the imposition of a metabolic burden on the engineered strains, as a consequence of the production of the cellulose degrading enzymes. The slightly more vigorous growth of wild-type strain in the early phase of the cultures is most likely due to the utilisation of the small amount of xylose present in pre-treated wheat straw. Once this is exhausted, the cell density of wild-type cultures significantly declined. Monitoring of cellulolytic activities in BZ9 and BZ10 strains growing on pre-treated wheat straw as a sole carbon source confirmed that all the enzymes were expressed, secreted and functional.

To produce cellulosic ethanol, the biomass degrading ability of the recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9 and BZ10 was combined with the ethanologenic property of the G. thermoglucosidasius LS242 strain [26] resulting in strains BZ243 and BZ244, respectively. Production of ethanol from pre-treated wheat straw was approximately twofold and 1.6-fold higher compared to non-engineered LS242, demonstrating that at least some cellulose was converted into ethanol. Despite the fact that strains BZ243 and BZ244 were the first reported engineered G. thermoglucosidasius strains producing ethanol directly using cellulose obtained from industry relevant process without enzymatic treatment, the yield of ethanol is very low and far from being industrially relevant when compared with pure glucose fermentation [23]. This could be attributed to several factors. Firstly, recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius BZ243 and BZ244 strains were cultured for fermentation in micro-aerobic condition with no shaking and aeration, which may lead to unequal distribution of insoluble pre-treated wheat straw, compromising feedstock utilisation. Secondly, the activity of the Pldh promoter is known to be threefold lower in cultures grown under micro-aerobic conditions compared to in aerobic conditions [32]. Thirdly, the effect of fermentative growth conditions on expression levels and enzyme activities, as well as the concerted action of the enzymes used, are unpredictable and hard to measure or compare to the native GHs producing organisms.


In this report, we have heterologously expressed GH enzymes (CtCelA, Cel6B, CglT and CbCelA) in G. thermoglucosidasius both individually and synergistically with detectable activities. When grown on pre-treated wheat straw as a sole carbon source, engineered G. thermoglucosidasius BZ9 and BZ10 strains drastically improved growth compared to the wild-type control suggesting the combined production of these GHs facilitate lignocellulosic degradation. Further, heterologous expression of GHs in an engineered ethanologenic G. thermoglucosidasius LS242 strain has led to substantial increase in the production of ethanol from pre-treated wheat straw. Whilst a small step of many, this advancement is supportive of the potential of G. thermoglucosidasius as a cellulolytic chassis for the fermentative production of biofuel. The use of the recombinant, cellulolytic G. thermoglucosidasius as a process organism is not, however, limited to ethanol production but has the potential to be used to produce many other biofuels and renewable chemicals with further genetic modifications.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

All the chemicals and bacteriological media were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd (Poole, UK) or Fisher Scientific Ltd (Loughborough, UK). DNA polymerases, restriction enzymes, deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), DNA markers and associated reaction buffers were sourced from Thermo Fischer Scientific (UK) or New England Biolabs Ltd. (Hitchin, UK), T4 DNA ligase from Promega (Southampton, UK). EDTA-Free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets were purchased from Roche (Mannheim, Germany).

Bacterial strains, media and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli Top10 was used as a host for plasmid constructions and routinely grown aerobically with agitation of 200 rpm at 37 °C or 30 °C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or agar supplemented with 50 µg/ml kanamycin or 100 µg/ml ampicillin. G. thermoglucosidasius strains were routinely grown on TSA agar or in 2SPYNG broth (16-g Soy peptone, 10-g Yeast extract and 5-g NaCl) supplemented with 12.5 µg/ml kanamycin. For the protein expression, recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius were pre-cultured overnight in 10 ml of 2SPYNG medium supplemented with 12.5 µg/ml kanamycin in 50-ml falcon constantly rotating at 250 rpm, 52 °C. Fresh pre-warmed 50-ml 2SPYNG medium in baffled conical flask (Sigma, UK) was inoculated with the overnight cultures at a starting OD600 of 0.2 and grown until late stationary phase for almost 8–9 h. For the growth experiments with different carbohydrates, engineered G. thermoglucosidasius strains were grown in modified ASYE [27] medium (per 1 l: 1× M9 minimal salts (sigma), 0.24-g MgSO4, 0.011-g CaCl2, 0.01-g Thiamine-HCl, 0.384-g citric acid, 27.8-mg FeSO4.7H2O, 4.6-mg NiCl3.6H2O, 3.05-mg biotin, 47.6-g HEPES, 5-g yeast extract, 1000× dilution of Trace metal mix A5 and 10-g cellobiose or pre-treated wheat straw) at 250 rpm, 55 °C. The pretreated wheat straw sample used was generated at the DBT-ICT 2G Ethanol Demonstration Facility and was kindly gifted by Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai. Characterization for the ethanol production on 1% pre-treated wheat straw in modified ASYE medium at 55 °C was carried out in sealed 50 ml falcon tube as previously described method [26]. For the selection of integrated genes in G. thermoglucosidasius, clostridial basal medium (CBM) agar supplemented with 1% w/v xylose was used [64]. All the solidified media contained 1.5% w/v agarose.

Table 1 List of bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study. G. thermoglucosidasius is abbreviated as G. t. and E. coli as E. c

Design and synthesis of genes encoding CtCelA, Cel6B, CglT and CbCelA

The selected GH genes; celA encoding endoglucanase (EC from Clostridium thermocellum (designated as CtcelA), cel6B encoding exoglucanase (EC from Thermobifida fusca YX, cglT encoding β-glucosidase (EC from Thermoanaerobacter brockii and celA encoding multidomain cellulase (EC and EC from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii (designated as CbcelA) were designed as standard BioBrick-2 assembly parts. Each BioBrick-2 part consists of DNA fragment flanked by prefix (contains EcoRI/NotI/SpeI restriction sites) and suffix (consists of NheI/NotI/PstI sites) sequences at 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively. In the BioBrick-2 assembly process, the combination of two parts (e.g., fusion of promoter to a gene) forms a new part which contains a scar (GCTAGT) at the junction point of the two progenitor parts while maintaining the same prefix and suffix which allows the subsequent assembly with more BioBrick-2 parts. The scar sequence represents the fusion of DNA that has been cut with SpeI/NheI sites and the compatible sticky ends ligated together. At the 5′-ends of each gene, BioBrick-2 prefix and the synthetic sequence 5′-TTATATTGAAGGAGGATGAATGCA-3′ in which the RBS is indicated in bold was added. FLAG-epitope before the stop codon and BioBrick-2 suffix sequence was added at the 3′-ends of the CtcelA, cel6B, cglT and CbcelA gene sequences. The Pldh promoter of the lactate dehydrogenase encoding gene (ldh) was synthesised without its native ribosome binding site (RBS) in the BioBrick-2 format. All the four encoding genes were codon optimised based on the genome sequence of G. thermoglucosidasius C56-YS93 and synthesised by Biomatik (Ontario, Canada) in the standard BB2 format. The overall configuration in synthesised BioBrick-2 format is 5′-BioBrick2prefix-syntheticRBS-gene-FLAG tag-BioBrick2suffix-3′. The BioBrick-2 assembled nucleotide sequences of CtcelA, cel6B, cglT and CbcelA along with the Pldh promoter sequence used in this study are shown in Additional file 1: S1.

Plasmid and strain constructions

The oligonucleotide primers used are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. NEBuilder Assembly Tool was used to design primers for NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly reactions and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, UK. NEBase Changer was employed to design primers specific to the mutagenesis experiment using Q5® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit. For the amplification of the desired DNA product, either phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase or dream Taq Green PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) master mix was used. PCR-amplification was performed in a standard 25–50 µl reaction using a thin walled PCR tubes placed into either a Biometra T3000 thermocycler (Glassgow, UK) or Sensoquest lab cycler (Geneflow, UK). Restriction enzyme digestions and PCR products were routinely separated by agarose gel electrophoresis using 0.8–1% gels prepared with analytical grade agarose (Sigma, UK) in 1xTAE buffer (40-mM Tris, 1-mM EDTA and 0.1% (v/v) glacial acetic acid). DNA fragments were purified using Zymoclean™ Gel DNA Recovery Kit (ZymoResearch, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Chemically competent E. coli Top10 cells produced in-house were routinely used either to transform ligation reaction or complete plasmid and individual clones were selected on LB agar plates with 50 µg/ml kanamycin. Plasmids were purified using Qiagen Miniprep kit (Qiagen Ltd. Surrey, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and DNA was eluted in 30–50 μl nuclease-free water (Fisher Scientific, UK) followed by storage at − 20 °C until further use. Sanger sequencing (Source BioSciences, Nottingham, UK) was routinely performed to confirm the plasmid constructs. Preparation of G. thermoglucosidasius electro-competent cells and electroporation procedure using Genepulser electroporator (BioRad, UK) was done in accordance with the method previously described [26]. G. thermoglucosidasius stock cultures were routinely maintained at − 80 °C in 12.5% (v/v) of glycerol.

Construction of CtcelA expression vector

All the synthesised DNA fragments were delivered in pBSK vector. The CtcelA gene and the Pldh promoter synthesised in a BioBrick-2 format were assembled together in the vector pJ201 (DNA2.0) which contains the requisite prefix and suffix restriction sites for BioBrick-2 cloning. pBSK–Pldh and pBSK–CtcelA were digested with EcoRI/NheI and SpeI/PstI, respectively, and ligated at EcoRI/PstI site in pJ201 vector yielding pJ201–CtcelA plasmid. Pldh–CtcelA cassette was subcloned from pJ201–CtcelA into pMTLgSlimS upon digestion with NotI/NheI resulting in pMTLgSlimS–CtcelA expression vector.

Construction of cel6B expression vector

pBSK–Pldh and pBSK–cel6B were digested with EcoRI/NheI and SpeI/PstI, respectively, and ligated at EcoRI/PstI site in pJ201 vector yielding pJ201–cel6B plasmid. Pldhcel6B cassette was subcloned from pJ201–cel6B into pMTLgSlimS upon digestion with NotI/NheI resulting in pMTLgSlimS–cel6B expression vector.

Construction of cglT expression vector

pBSK–Pldh and pBSK–cglT were digested with EcoRI/NheI and SpeI/PstI, respectively, and ligated at EcoRI/PstI site in pJ201 vector yielding pJ201–cglT plasmid. PldhcglT cassette was subcloned from pJ201–cglT into pMTLgSlimS upon digestion with NotI/NheI resulting in pMTLgSlimS–cglT expression vector.

Construction of CbcelA expression vector

pBSK–Pldh and pBSK–CbcelA were digested with EcoRI/NheI and SpeI/PstI, respectively, and ligated at EcoRI/PstI site in pJ201 vector yielding pJ201–CbcelA plasmid. Pldh–CbcelA cassette was subcloned from pJ201–CbcelA into pMTLgSlimS upon digestion with NotI/NheI resulting in pMTLgSlimS–CbcelA expression vector.

Construction of CtcelA–cel6B operon

For the construction of CtcelA and cel6B operon under the transcriptional control of Pldh promoter, NEBuilder-HiFi DNA Assembly method was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, pMTLgSlimS plasmid was linearized by PCR amplification employing pMTLgSLimS_HiFi_F and pMTLgSLimS_HiFi_R primers (detailed sequence in Additional file 1: Table S1). The cel6B nucleotide sequence was amplified from plasmid pMTLgSlimS–cel6B using Cel6B_F and Cel6B_R pair of primers with the incorporation of new RBS-5 (TTTTAAAGGAGGTATAAGCT) upstream of the start codon. Pldh–CtcelA expression cassette was amplified from pMTLgSlimS–CtcelA plasmid without FLAG-tag at the C-terminal using Pldh_CelA_F and Pldh_CelA_R primers. All these modifications were done to avoid repetitions of FLAG-tag or same synthetic RBS in an operon and insertion of Pldh–CtcelAcel6B cassette in lacz region of pMTLgSlimS vector between XbaI and HindIII restriction recognition sites. The PCR gel-purified pMTLgSlimS, cel6B and Pldh–CtcelA were assembled together using master mix–HiFi assembly kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol yielding pMTLgSlimS–CtcelAcel6B expression plasmid.

Chromosomal integration of cglT gene via Allele-Coupled Exchange (ACE)

The cglT gene along with the Pldh promoter was subcloned from pMTLgSlims–cglT between the SpeI and NotI restriction sites of the integrative vector pMTLgSlimS–LS3 [26] giving rise to pMTLgSlims–LS3–cglT. For the integration of cglT gene into the chromosome at the pyrE locus using ACE [26], G. thermoglucosidasius ΔpyrE cells were electroporated with 1 µg of the pMTLgSLims–LS3–cglT plasmid DNA. Briefly, following the transformation procedure [23], cells were plated onto TSA plates supplemented with 12.5 μg/ml kanamycin and incubated overnight at 52 °C. Six large clones were then streaked on to CBM1X (CBM with 1% w/v xylose) plates lacking uracil and incubated at 62 °C for overnight. Further, single colonies were re-streaked twice on CBM1X plates without uracil to purify and incubated for 16–18 h at 62 °C. Single colonies were used as a template for colony-PCR to confirm the integration of cglT expression cassette with pyrE_C1_F and pyrE_C2_R primers (Additional file 1: Table S1).

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

The supernatants from G. thermoglucosidasius strains expressing extracellular recombinant CtCelA, Cel6B and CbCelA proteins were collected by centrifuging 10-ml culture at 7000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. Then, 1 ml of Trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 10% w/v) was added for precipitation of proteins and the suspension was stored at − 20 °C for overnight. The next day, samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C and pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 100 mM Tris–HCl followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The washing step of pellet with 100 mM Tris–HCl was repeated three times. After the final wash, protein pellet was air dried for 60 min at room temperature and 2X NuPAGE® Lithium dodecyl suphate (LDS) Sample (Thermo Fisher, UK) buffer was added to the pellet.

Cell lysate was prepared by spinning (7000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C) 50 ml of G. thermoglucosidasius cells expressing recombinant CglT protein grown in 2SPYNG medium. The cell pellet was washed with 5 ml of 50-mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.8) and resuspended in 1 ml of same buffer containing EDTA-free complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablets. Cells placed in ice bath were disrupted by sonication using Soniprep 150 Ultrasonic Disintegrator (MSE Scientific Instruments, Wolflabs, UK) and the lysed cells were pelleted at 25,000×g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant that corresponds to the soluble fraction of the cell extract was further used for SDS-PAGE or enzyme activity analysis.

All the protein samples were boiled at 95 °C for 5 min and separated by SDS-PAGE using precast 4–12% NuPAGE® Bis–Tris (Thermo Fischer, UK) polyacrylamide gels according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To determine the size of the recombinant polypeptide, broad range precision plus protein™ Kaleidoscop™ pre-stained protein (Biorad, UK) marker was also loaded onto the SDS-PAGE gels. After the gel electrophoresis, proteins were electro transferred from SDS-PAGE gels onto the Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Mini PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, UK) for the western blotting. The transfer was carried out using the Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Transfer System (Bio-Rad) at an electric current of 1.3 A, voltage of 25 V for 7 min. After the run was complete, membrane was blocked with 1.5% dried skimmed milk powder (Sigma, UK) in 30 ml Tris-Buffered Saline (TBS) (0.05-M Tris pH 8.0, 0.15-M NaCl) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was further incubated with fresh blocking solution, 1.5% dried skimmed milk powder in TBS containing at a dilution of 1:3000 monoclonal Anti-FLAG® M2-peroxidase (HRP) antibody (Sigma, UK) and incubated overnight in a shaker at 4 °C. The monoclonal Anti-FLAG M2-Peroxidase is a mouse IgG antibody covalently conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and binds to FLAG fusion proteins. After overnight incubation, membrane was washed six times with TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 10 min each before developing the blot using the colorimetric 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) as a substrate (Sigma, UK). After 5 min of exposure with TMB, the blot was dried and acquired for the image using scanner.

Determination of protein concentration and enzyme activity assays

Total protein concentrations in the supernatant or soluble fraction of cell lysates were determined using BCA-kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions and standard curve generated from BSA (200–1000 µg/ml) was used to calculate the protein concentrations. For Congo-red plate staining assay, wild type and recombinant G. thermoglucosidasius strains producing CtCelA were streaked on TSA agar plates containing 0.5% CMC followed by incubation at 52 °C overnight. Next day, plates were flooded with 0.1% Congo red solution for 30 min at room temperature and then washed with 1-M NaCl solution [65]. RAC as a substrate for exoglucanase activity was prepared from Avicel® PH-101 (Sigma, UK) as described by the method [66]. The quantitative enzyme activities of heterologous endoglucanase (CtCelA, CbCelA) and exoglucanase (Cel6B, CbCelA) were assayed with CMC (carboxy-methyl cellulose) and RAC, respectively, using the DNSA (3, 5-Dinitrosalicylic acid) method [67, 68]. Briefly, the reaction mixture containing 0.125 ml of culture supernatant (as an enzyme solution) and 0.125 ml of 1% CMC or RAC in 100 mM citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) was incubated at 60 °C. Reactions were terminated after 1 and 16 h for CMC and RAC assays, respectively, by adding 0.25 ml of DNSA reagent and heating the mixture at 100 °C for 10 min. 0.1 ml of mixture was transferred into 96-well plate and the absorbance measured at 540 nm using CLARIOstar plate reader (BMG Labtech, UK). As a control, enzyme blank and substrate-independent reactions were performed simultaneously, and the absorbance determined was subtracted from the sample absorbance. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme catalysing the release of 1 µmol of reducing sugar per min from substrate under the specified assay conditions.

Synthetic chromogenic substrates p-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) (Sigma, UK) and p-nitrophenyl-β-d-cellobioside (pNPC) (Sigma, UK) were used for detection of β-glucosidase (CglT) and cellobiohydrolase activity, respectively [67]. The reaction mixture containing 50-mM citrate phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 5-mM pNPG or pNPC and 0.125-ml supernatant (used as enzyme) in a total volume of 0.55 ml was incubated at 60 °C for 10 min. After incubation 1 ml of 1% Na2CO3 was added in the mixtures to stop the reaction and absorbance measured at 400 nm with CLARIOstar plate reader (BMG Labtech, UK). Enzyme activity was calculated using calibration curve prepared with p-nitrophenol standard and one unit of enzyme activity is defined as the release of 1 μmol of pNP per minute under the above conditions.

Analytical techniques

Bacterial cell growth was measured at an optical density of 600 nm (OD600) using a Novaspec II spectrophotometer (Pharmacia LKB Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Fermentation samples at various time points were collected, centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min and cell-free supernatant was used for analysis of ethanol by HPLC. Internal standard solution (80-mM valeric acid in 0.005-M H2SO4) was mixed with equal volume (0.2 ml) cell-free supernatant and filtered through 0.22-µm HPLC certified syringe filter (Whatman® Spartan®, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, UK) and transferred into a HPLC vial with a 100 µl insert. Ethanol concentrations were quantified by Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system equipped with a 300 mm × 7.8 mm Aminex® HPX-87H (Bio-Rad, UK) column set at 35 °C using 5-mM H2SO4 as the mobile phase and monitored using a refractive index (RI) and Diode Array UV–Vis-detector. All the experiments were performed in triplicates and the statistically significant differences between the test samples were calculated in the PRISM (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, USA) software using Student’s t test or ANOVA. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Allele Coupled Exchange


Carbohydrate Active Enzymes


cellobiohydrolase I


cellobiohydrolase II


carbohydrate binding module


Clostridium basal medium


consolidated bioprocessing


carbon catabolite repression


colony forming unit




3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid


deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates


glycoside hydrolases


horseradish peroxidase


Luria–Bertania medium


lithium dodecyl sulphate


optical density at 600 nm


polymerase chain reaction






regenerated phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose


ribosome binding sites


revolutions per minute


standard error mean


Tris-Buffered Saline


trichloroacetic acid




Tryptic Soy Agar


  1. 1.

    Amin FR, Khalid H, Zhang H, Rahman SU, Zhang R, Liu G, Chen C. Pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion. AMB Express. 2017;7(1):72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Socha AM, Parthasarathi R, Shi J, Pattathil S, Whyte D, Bergeron M, George A, Tran K, Stavila V, Venkatachalam S, et al. Efficient biomass pretreatment using ionic liquids derived from lignin and hemicellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(35):E3587–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D233–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science. 2007;315(5813):804–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mazzoli R, Lamberti C, Pessione E. Engineering new metabolic capabilities in bacteria: lessons from recombinant cellulolytic strategies. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(2):111–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Akinosho H, Yee K, Close D, Ragauskas A. The emergence of Clostridium thermocellum as a high utility candidate for consolidated bioprocessing applications. Front Chem. 2014;2:66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhao L, Cao G-L, Wang A-J, Ren H-Y, Zhang K, Ren N-Q. Consolidated bioprocessing performance of Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum M18 on fungal pretreated cornstalk for enhanced hydrogen production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):178.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Turner P, Mamo G, Karlsson EN. Potential and utilization of thermophiles and thermostable enzymes in biorefining. Microb Cell Fact. 2007;6:9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Keller M, Loder A, Basen M, Izquierdo J, Kelly RM, Adams MWW. Production of lignofuels and electrofuels by extremely thermophilic microbes. Biofuels. 2014;5(5):499–515.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chang T, Yao S. Thermophilic, lignocellulolytic bacteria for ethanol production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92(1):13–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Taylor MP, Eley KL, Martin S, Tuffin MI, Burton SG, Cowan DA. Thermophilic ethanologenesis: future prospects for second-generation bioethanol production. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:398–405.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Egorova K, Antranikian G. Industrial relevance of thermophilic Archaea. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(6):649–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Verbeke TJ, Giannone RJ, Klingeman DM, Engle NL, Rydzak T, Guss AM, Tschaplinski TJ, Brown SD, Hettich RL, Elkins JG. Pentose sugars inhibit metabolism and increase expression of an AgrD-type cyclic pentapeptide in Clostridium thermocellum. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:43355.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Papanek B, O’Dell KB, Manga P, Giannone RJ, Klingeman DM, Hettich RL, Brown SD, Guss AM. Transcriptomic and proteomic changes from medium supplementation and strain evolution in high-yielding Clostridium thermocellum strains. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;45(11):1007–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tian L, Cervenka ND, Low AM, Olson DG, Lynd LR. A mutation in the AdhE alcohol dehydrogenase of Clostridium thermocellum increases tolerance to several primary alcohols, including isobutanol, n-butanol and ethanol. Scientific Rep. 2019;9(1):1736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shaw AJ, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR. Identification of the [FeFe]-hydrogenase responsible for hydrogen generation in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum and demonstration of increased ethanol yield via hydrogenase knockout. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(20):6457–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shaw AJ, Podkaminer KK, Desai SG, Bardsley JS, Rogers SR, Thorne PG, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR. Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(37):13769–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shaw AJ, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR. Natural competence in Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium Species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(14):4713.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chung D, Cha M, Guss AM, Westpheling J. Direct conversion of plant biomass to ethanol by engineered Caldicellulosiruptor bescii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(24):8931–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zeldes BM, Keller MW, Loder AJ, Straub CT, Adams MWW, Kelly RM. Extremely thermophilic microorganisms as metabolic engineering platforms for production of fuels and industrial chemicals. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1209.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yan Q, Fong SS. Challenges and advances for genetic engineering of non-model bacteria and uses in consolidated bioprocessing. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2060.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nazina TN, Tourova TP, Poltaraus AB, Novikova EV, Grigoryan AA, Ivanova AE, Lysenko AM, Petrunyaka VV, Osipov GA, Belyaev SS, et al. Taxonomic study of aerobic thermophilic bacilli: descriptions of Geobacillus subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from petroleum reservoirs and transfer of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bacillus thermoleovorans, Bacillus kaustophilus, Bacillus thermodenitrificans to Geobacillus as the new combinations G. stearothermophilus, G. th. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51(Pt 2):433–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cripps RE, Eley K, Leak DJ, Rudd B, Taylor M, Todd M. Metabolic engineering of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius for high yield ethanol production. Metab Eng. 2009;11:398–408.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Van Zyl LJ, Taylor MP, Eley K, Tuffin M, Cowan DA. Engineering pyruvate decarboxylase-mediated ethanol production in the thermophilic host Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(3):1247–59.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhou J, Wu K, Rao C. Evolutionary engineering of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius for improved ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:2156–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sheng L, Kovács K, Winzer K, Zhang Y, Minton NP. Development and implementation of rapid metabolic engineering tools for chemical and fuel production in Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius NCIMB 11955. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lin PP, Rabe KS, Takasumi JL, Kadisch M, Arnold FH, Liao JC. Isobutanol production at elevated temperatures in thermophilic Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Metab Eng. 2014;24:1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Brumm PJ, De Maayer P, Mead DA, Cowan DA. Genomic analysis of six new Geobacillus strains reveals highly conserved carbohydrate degradation architectures and strategies. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:430.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Assareh R, Shahbani Zahiri H, Akbari Noghabi K, Aminzadeh S, Bakhshi Khaniki G. Characterization of the newly isolated Geobacillus sp. T1, the efficient cellulase-producer on untreated barley and wheat straws. Bioresour Technol. 2012;120:99–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bhalla A, Bischoff KM, Uppugundla N, Balan V, Sani RK. Novel thermostable endo-xylanase cloned and expressed from bacterium Geobacillus sp. WSUCF1. Bioresour Technol. 2014;165:314–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ng IS, Li CW, Yeh YF, Chen PT, Chir JL, Ma CH, Yu SM, Ho TH, Tong CG. A novel endo-glucanase from the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus sp. 70PC53 with high activity and stability over a broad range of temperatures. Extremophiles. 2009;13(3):425–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bartosiak-Jentys J, Hussein AH, Lewis CJ, Leak DJ. Modular system for assessment of glycosyl hydrolase secretion in Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Microbiology. 2013;159(Pt 7):1267–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Suzuki H, Yoshida K, Ohshima T. Polysaccharide-degrading thermophiles generated by heterologous gene expression in Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(17):5151–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wilson DB. Three microbial strategies for plant cell wall degradation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1125:289–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Scott M, Gunderson CW, Mateescu EM, Zhang Z, Hwa T. Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science. 2010;330(6007):1099–102.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chung D, Young J, Bomble YJ, Vander Wall TA, Groom J, Himmel ME, Westpheling J. Homologous expression of the Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA reveals that the extracellular protein is glycosylated. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119508.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zverlov V, Mahr S, Riedel K, Bronnenmeier K. Properties and gene structure of a bifunctional cellulolytic enzyme (CelA) from the extreme thermophile ‘Anaerocellum thermophilum’ with separate glycosyl hydrolase family 9 and 48 catalytic domains. Microbiology. 1998;144(Pt 2):457–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gefen G, Anbar M, Morag E, Lamed R, Bayer EA. Enhanced cellulose degradation by targeted integration of a cohesin-fused beta-glucosidase into the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(26):10298–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Singhania RR, Patel AK, Sukumaran RK, Larroche C, Pandey A. Role and significance of beta-glucosidases in the hydrolysis of cellulose for bioethanol production. Biores Technol. 2013;127:500–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lali AMO, Annamma Anil; Birhade, Sachinkumar Hiraman; Victoria, Juliet Joanna and Sawant, Sneha Chandrakant.: Process for Production of Soluble Sugars from Biomass. US patent 20160333382 2016.

  41. 41.

    Schwarz WH, Grabnitz F, Staudenbauer WL. Properties of a Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase produced in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986;51(6):1293–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Adav SS, Ng CS, Arulmani M, Sze SK. Quantitative iTRAQ secretome analysis of cellulolytic Thermobifida fusca. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(6):3016–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Brunecky R, Alahuhta M, Xu Q, Donohoe BS, Crowley MF, Kataeva IA, Yang SJ, Resch MG, Adams MW, Lunin VV, et al. Revealing nature’s cellulase diversity: the digestion mechanism of Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA. Science. 2013;342(6165):1513–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Brunecky R, Alahuhta M, Sammond DW, Xu Q, Chen M, Wilson DB, Brady JW, Himmel ME, Bomble YJ, Lunin VV. Natural diversity of glycoside hydrolase family 48 exoglucanases: insights from structure. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):274.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Breves R, Bronnenmeier K, Wild N, Lottspeich F, Staudenbauer WL, Hofemeister J. Genes encoding two different beta-glucosidases of Thermoanaerobacter brockii are clustered in a common operon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(10):3902–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yi Z, Su X, Revindran V, Mackie RI, Cann I. Molecular and biochemical analyses of CbCel9A/Cel48A, a highly secreted multi-modular cellulase by Caldicellulosiruptor bescii during growth on crystalline cellulose. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e84172.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chung D, Sarai NS, Knott BC, Hengge N, Russell JF, Yarbrough JM, Brunecky R, Young J, Supekar N, Vander Wall T, et al. Glycosylation is vital for industrial performance of hyperactive cellulases. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7(5):4792–800.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yan S, Wu G. Signal peptide of cellulase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(12):5329–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Freudl R. Signal peptides for recombinant protein secretion in bacterial expression systems. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17(1):52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Krishnappa L, Monteferrante CG, Neef J, Dreisbach A, van Dijl JM. Degradation of extracytoplasmic catalysts for protein folding in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(4):1463–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pohl S, Bhavsar G, Hulme J, Bloor AE, Misirli G, Leckenby MW, Radford DS, Smith W, Wipat A, Williamson ED, et al. Proteomic analysis of Bacillus subtilis strains engineered for improved production of heterologous proteins. Proteomics. 2013;13(22):3298–308.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang W, Hollmann R, Deckwer WD. Comparative proteomic analysis of high cell density cultivations with two recombinant Bacillus megaterium strains for the production of a heterologous dextransucrase. Proteome Sci. 2006;4:19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Forsberg Z, Heggset EB, Eijsink VGH, Aachmann FL, Courtade G. The carbohydrate-binding module and linker of a modular lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase promote localized cellulose oxidation. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:13006–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pasari N, Adlakha N, Gupta M, Bashir Z, Rajacharya GH, Verma G, Munde M, Bhatnagar R, Yazdani SS. Impact of module-X2 and Carbohydrate Binding Module-3 on the catalytic activity of associated glycoside hydrolases towards plant biomass. Scientific Rep. 2017;7(1):3700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Reyes-Ortiz V, Heins RA, Cheng G, Kim EY, Vernon BC, Elandt RB, Adams PD, Sale KL, Hadi MZ, Simmons BA, et al. Addition of a carbohydrate-binding module enhances cellulase penetration into cellulose substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lambertz C, Garvey M, Klinger J, Heesel D, Klose H, Fischer R, Commandeur U. Challenges and advances in the heterologous expression of cellulolytic enzymes: a review. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):135.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Garvey M, Klose H, Fischer R, Lambertz C, Commandeur U. Cellulases for biomass degradation: comparing recombinant cellulase expression platforms. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31(10):581–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bhattacharya AS, Bhattacharya A, Pletschke BI. Synergism of fungal and bacterial cellulases and hemicellulases: a novel perspective for enhanced bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol Lett. 2015;37(6):1117–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Cornet P, Millet J, Beguin P, Aubert J-P. Characterization of Two Cel (Cellulose Degradation) genes of Clostridium thermocellum coding for endoglucanases. Nat Biotechnol. 1983;1(7):589–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Gusakov AV, Salanovich TN, Antonov AI, Ustinov BB, Okunev ON, Burlingame R, Emalfarb M, Baez M, Sinitsyn AP. Design of highly efficient cellulase mixtures for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;97(5):1028–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Amster-Choder O, Houman F, Wright A. Protein phosphorylation regulates transcription of the beta-glucoside utilization operon in E. coli. Cell. 1989;58(5):847–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Harwani D, Zangoui P, Mahadevan S. The beta-glucoside (bgl) operon of Escherichia coli is involved in the regulation of oppA, encoding an oligopeptide transporter. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(1):90–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Xu Y, Ye BC. GlnR and PhoP regulate beta-glucosidases involved in cellulose digestion in response to nitrogen and phosphate availability. Microbiology. 2018;164(5):779–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    O’Brien RW, Morris JG. Oxygen and the growth and metabolism of Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Gen Microbiol. 1971;68(3):307–18.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Teather RM, Wood PJ. Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;43(4):777–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zhang YH, Cui J, Lynd LR, Kuang LR. A transition from cellulose swelling to cellulose dissolution by o-phosphoric acid: evidence from enzymatic hydrolysis and supramolecular structure. Biomacromol. 2006;7(2):644–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Bashir Z, Kondapalli VK, Adlakha N, Sharma A, Bhatnagar RK, Chandel G, Yazdani SS. Diversity and functional significance of cellulolytic microbes living in termite, pill-bug and stem-borer guts. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2558.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31(3):426–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Prof Harry Gilbert and Dr Vinod Kumar for helpful discussions and Matthew Abbott for his help with the HPLC methodology and analysis.


This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [grant number BB/K020358/1] (UK, BBSRC) as part of the joint BBSRC and DBT (Department of Biotechnology, India) Sustainable Bioenergy and Biofuels (SuBB) programme grant RICEFUEL. The BBSRC and the DBT played no role in the design of the study and the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript. ZB acknowledges the financial support of the University of Nottingham with Vice-Chancellors Scholarship while LS acknowledges the support of BBSRC grant BB/N022718/1 (MaxBio).

Author information




ZB carried out the laboratory work, data analysis and drafted the manuscript. NPM helped design the study and edited the manuscript. LS participated in the laboratory work and coordination of the final part of the study. AA helped with the biomass pre-treatment. AL helped and coordinated the biomass quality control. YZ conceived the study, oversaw its design and coordination, helped with the data analysis and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consented to the publication of this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1.

Figures S1–S5, Tables S1, File S1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bashir, Z., Sheng, L., Anil, A. et al. Engineering Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius for direct utilisation of holocellulose from wheat straw. Biotechnol Biofuels 12, 199 (2019).

Download citation


  • Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius
  • Biomass
  • Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP)
  • Glycoside hydrolases
  • Cellulases
  • Endo/exoglucanases
  • β-Glucosidase