- Open Access
Combining hot-compressed water and ball milling pretreatments to improve the efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis of eucalyptus
© Inoue et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 05 October 2007
- Accepted: 15 April 2008
- Published: 15 April 2008
Lignocellulosic biomass such as wood is an attractive material for fuel ethanol production. Pretreatment technologies that increase the digestibility of cellulose and hemicellulose in the lignocellulosic biomass have a major influence on the cost of the subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation processes. Pretreatments without chemicals such as acids, bases or organic solvents are less effective for an enzymatic hydrolysis process than those with chemicals, but they have a less negative effect on the environment.
The enzymatic digestibility of eucalyptus was examined following a combined pretreatment without chemicals comprising a ball milling (BM) and hot-compressed water (HCW) treatment. The BM treatment simultaneously improved the digestibility of both glucan and xylan, and was effective in lowering the enzyme loading compared with the HCW treatment. The combination of HCW and BM treatment reduced the BM time. The eucalyptus treated with HCW (160°C, 30 minutes) followed by BM (20 minutes) had an approximately 70% yield of total sugar with a cellulase loading of 4 FPU/g substrate. This yield was comparable to the yields from samples treated with HCW (200°C, 30 minutes) or BM (40 minutes) hydrolyzed with 40 FPU/g substrate.
The HCW treatment is useful in improving the milling efficiency. The combined HCW-BM treatment can save energy and enzyme loading.
Lignocellulosic biomass, such as wood and agricultural residues, is an attractive material for fuel ethanol production because it contains large amounts of potentially fermentable sugars in the form of cellulose and hemicellulose. Recent studies have indicated that the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol involves three processes: (1) a pretreatment process to increase the digestibility of cellulose and hemicellulose in the feedstock; (2) an enzymatic hydrolysis process to recover fermentable sugars from the pretreated material; and (3) a fermentation process to convert the obtained sugars into ethanol . The cost of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass is too high based on current technologies and, therefore, considerable research effort has been devoted to improving the hydrolysis of the feedstock .
The choice of pretreatment for lignocellulosic biomass has a major influence on the cost of subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis [3–5]. The purpose of the pretreatment is to alter or remove the physical and chemical impediments that inhibit the accessibility of the enzyme to the substrates. The removal of hemicellulose and lignin from lignocellulosic biomass by adding inexpensive chemicals such as acids, bases or organic solvents is known to have a significant effect on enzymatic hydrolysis [2, 5–7]. However, these chemicals may require corrosion-resistant reactors and must be neutralized or recycled to reduce their negative impacts on the environment as well as on subsequent processes (for example, fermentation).
Uncatalyzed hydrothermal hydrolysis and mechanical comminution of lignocellulosic biomass are regarded as environmentally benign processes because no chemicals are used. Hydrothermal treatment using steam or hot-compressed water (HCW) is an effective process for the enzymatic hydrolysis of hardwoods and agricultural residues, although it has a relatively small effect on softwoods [1, 2, 8, 9]. Water itself and the acetyl groups in hemicellulose act as acids at around 200°C, thereby dissolving both hemicellulose and lignin from lignocellulosic biomass [10–15]. Mechanical comminution is sometimes required to make material easier to handle through subsequent processes [1, 16]. Furthermore, reduction of the crystallinity of cellulose by ball milling (BM) or a compression milling treatment has been reported to increase the enzymatic digestibility of various cellulosic substrates including softwoods remarkably [17–21]. The efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis is greatly affected by the degree of milling, which consumes excessive amounts of energy [20–22].
Here we report the effects of a combined HCW-BM treatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis of eucalyptus. This pretreatment technology was designed to shorten the milling time of BM treatment by using a HCW-treated residue. The optimized HCW-BM treatment has the possibility of reducing not only the energy requirement for each pretreatment but also the cellulase loading for enzymatic hydrolysis.
Effect of BM treatment on the enzymatic digestibility of eucalyptus
In this study, sugar yields reported were calculated on the basis of the sugar contents in the dried eucalyptus: 40.0% glucan, 10.4% xylan and a total of 50.4% sugars. The enzymatic digestibilities of pretreated materials were evaluated using an enzyme cocktail containing Acremonium cellulase from Acremonium cellulolyticus, which is a well-known commercial cellulase that has higher β-glucosidase activity than that of conventional cellulase from Trichoderma species .
Effect of milling time on enzymatic digestibility of eucalyptus in ball-milling treatment
Milling time (minutes)
Yields of hydrolyzed sugars
Total yield (%)
Enzymatic digestibility of xylan in BM-treated eucalyptus
A supplemental hemicellulase, Optimash BG, had no effect on increasing glucan digestibility of 120-min milled eucalyptus in the presence of excess cellulase (40 FPU/g substrate), while it had great influence on increasing xylan digestibility. In the enzyme cocktail containing 40 FPU/g substrate of Acremonium cellulase, xylanase activity from Acremonium cellulase (1267 U/g substrate) was 25-fold higher than that from Optimash BG (51 U/g substrate). However, the supplementation of Optimash BG to the enzyme cocktail caused an increase in xylan digestibility of the material milled for 120 minutes from 54.0% to 72.5% (Table 1). Furthermore, the xylan digestibility of this sample reached 87.7% using the enzyme cocktail supplemented with a 10-fold excess of Optimash BG. These results suggest that the BM-treated xylan has a heterogeneous structure and that its complete degradation requires multiple enzymes.
The main structure of native hemicellulose from eucalyptus is an O-acetyl-(4-O-methyl-α-D-glucurono)-D-xylan, which is a typical structure for heterogeneous xylan of hardwoods . The heterogeneous xylan from Eucalyptus globulus has also been reported to have about one-third of the 4-O-methyl-α-D-glucuronopyranosyl residues substituted at O-2 by a terminal α-D-galactopyranose . Hemicellulases such as acetylxylan esterase and α-glucuronidase are presumed to play an important role in the degradation of BM-treated eucalyptus xylan, because the O-acetyl groups and 4-O-methyl-α-D-glucuronopyranosyl residues which sterically hinder xylanase activity have been reported to be removed by these accessory enzymes . The contributing mechanism of Optimash BG to hemicellulose degradation remains unknown. The production of acetate from BM-treated eucalyptus was observed by acetylxylan esterase activity in Acremonium cellulase regardless of the presence or absence of Optimash BG in the enzyme cocktail (data not shown). The structure and composition of hemicellulose is different in hardwoods, softwoods and agricultural residues; therefore, an optimal combination of hemicellulases will be important for the enzymatic hydrolysis of hemicellulose from BM-treated lignocellulosic biomass.
Effect of HCW treatment on the enzymatic digestibility of eucalyptus
Yields of glucose and xylose recovered from the soluble fraction and residue of eucalyptus pretreated with hot-compressed water
Yields of hydrolyzed sugars from
Total yield (%)
Increasing the enzymatic digestibility of the HCW-treated residue seems to be related to the removal rate of hemicellulose in the feedstock. Both the enzymatic digestibility and the CrI of the residue were maximal at the pretreatment temperature of 200°C (Table 2). The solid-remaining yield based on dry weight of this residue was 66.7% (Table 2), which contained 51.9% glucan and 1.1% xylan based on the sugar contents in the residue. The data imply that 13.4% glucan and 93% xylan in the untreated feedstock were solubilized under the conditions of 200°C for 30 minutes, but, unfortunately, a large fraction of them seemed to be further degraded. The enzymatic digestibility of this residue with the cellulase loading of 40 FPU/g substrate showed that 86.3% glucan in the residue was hydrolyzed to glucose, corresponding to 74.7% glucan based on sugar contents in the untreated feedstock (Table 2). The residue pretreated at 240°C was found to decrease the CrI as well as the enzymatic digestibility. This is due to a significant loss of glucan content by cellulose solubilization .
HCW-BM treatment of eucalyptus
In this study, we have demonstrated that the BM treatment of eucalyptus provides a favorable substrate for enzymatic hydrolysis and the ethanol fermentation process. The reduction of milling time, with its high energy consumption, is important to utilize the BM treatment as a practical pretreatment for lignocellulosic biomass. As a means of reducing the milling time, we examined the effect of HCW treatment on BM.
The efficacy of HCW-BM treatment
The efficacy of pretreatment for ethanol production was evaluated by: (i) the total yield of sugars recovered from both glucan and xylan in the feedstock; (ii) the cellulase loading; and (iii) the energy consumption for pretreatment process. Conditions to maximize the total sugar yield are often not the same as those to maximize individual sugar yields . For instance, the highest total sugar yield with the HCW treatment occurred at 200°C for 30 minutes. This corresponded to 65.2% of glucan and xylan contents in the untreated material (Table 2). However, the combined yield of xylose from the soluble fraction and the hydrolyzed residue was only 19.8% due to its further degradation to furfural that is known to be a representative inhibitor of ethanol fermentation. Control of the reaction time with HCW treatment is an important factor in maximizing the solubilization of the hemicellulose and minimizing the further degradation of sugars [11, 29]. On the other hand, BM treatment simultaneously increased the enzymatic digestibility of both glucan and xylan. At least 40 minutes of BM treatment was required to obtain a total yield similar to that of the HCW treatment (200°C, 30 minutes). The xylose yield of 49.2% recovered from the 40-minutes milled material was 2.5-fold higher than that from the HCW-treated material (Table 1). Furthermore, the 120-minute milled material showed higher yields of glucose (89.7%) and xylose (72.5%), although the energy requirement for pretreatment was increased.
Yields of glucose and xylose recovered from the soluble fraction and residue of eucalyptus pretreated with combined hot-compressed water and ball milling
Yields of hydrolyzed sugars from
Total yield (%)
The disruption of the cellulose-hemicellulose-lignin network structure by the BM treatment seems to be correlated with an increase in the catalytic efficiency of cellulase. The glucan digestibility of HCW-treated residue required a cellulase loading of approximately 40 FPU/g glucan (Fig. 3). Several factors related to a higher CrI of the substrate may contribute to the reduction of digestibility at the lower enzymatic loading: the decrease in the reactivity of the substrate during hydrolysis; different kinds of enzyme inactivation; and non-specific adsorption of enzymes onto lignin .
The energy consumption of BM was estimated at 108 MJ/kg wood under the experimental conditions of 100 g wood and 120 minutes of milling. It is known that the milling behavior follows the Rittinger law and that the energy consumption changes according to a scale factor of 0.2 (see ). From these data, the energy consumption of ball milling for 120 minutes was calculated at 31 MJ/kg wood under the conditions of a 100 dry t/d bioethanol plant . On the other hand, the energy consumption of the HCW-BM treatment (160°C, 30 minutes; 20-minute milling) was estimated at 6.97 MJ/kg wood under the same conditions, because the energy consumption of HCW treatment was estimated at 1.8 MJ/kg wood. These results suggest that the combined HCW-BM treatment is potentially cost effective: this treatment can reduce not only the cellulase loading for enzymatic hydrolysis but also the energy requirement compared with BM treatment.
It has been reported that multiple pretreatments of wheat straw consisting of BM followed by various chemical treatments were not promising compared with single chemical pretreatments . Our results suggest that the BM treatment should be combined with a pretreatment such as HCW for improving milling time. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the combination of HCW and BM involving mechanochemical effects is a new pretreatment process for lignocellulosic biomass. Although the HCW-treated residue was dried before BM treatment in this study, the drying process causes a significant increase in energy cost for pretreatment. We are performing further studies to establish milling technology with relatively low energy consumption for the wet HCW-treated residue.
The material pretreated by HCW gave a low yield of xylose accompanying furfural production and a high cellulase loading for glucan hydrolysis. The BM-treated material was a good substrate for enzymatic hydrolysis and subsequent ethanol fermentation, but it required excess energy for milling. We found that a partial solubilization of eucalyptus xylan by the HCW treatment at a relatively low temperature can reduce the milling time by disrupting the cellulose-hemicellulose-lignin network. This indicates that the HCW treatment plays an important role as a non-catalytic pretreatment improving milling efficiency. The combined HCW-BM treatment is proposed as a pretreatment without chemicals that has advantages regarding the reduction in both energy requirement and enzyme loading.
Eucalyptus wood chips were kindly supplied by a pulp factory in the vicinity of our research center (Oji Paper Co, Japan). The chips were mixtures of several species of imported eucalyptus. They were milled to pass a 2-mm screen and then collected between 35 and 100 mesh. The materials were homogenized in a single lot to avoid differences in composition among experiments and stored under dry conditions before use. The initial composition of eucalyptus wood was determined to be 40.0% glucan, 10.4% xylan and 28.8% acid-insoluble lignin, according to the analytical procedure recommended by NREL .
The wood material with a moisture content of 8.8% (2.5 g) and water (30 ml) were mixed in a 50-ml stainless steel autoclave (Nitto Koatsu Co, Tsukuba, Japan) fitted with a two-blade turbine impeller. Argon was purged into the autoclave at an initial pressure of 5.0 MPa. The autoclave was heated and maintained for 30 minutes within ± 2°C of the target temperatures (120-240°C) with stirring. The reaction temperature was monitored using a thermocouple probe, which was inserted into the vessel through an outlet and controlled using proportional-integral-derivative (PID) modules. The heat-up time for pretreatment using this equipment was 14°C/minute. At the end of the reaction period, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature. The solid residue was recovered by filtration, washed with distilled water at room temperature and lyophilized. The soluble fraction was used for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of monosaccharides and furfural compounds. To determine the total amount of sugars (monomers and oligomers) in the soluble fraction, the samples were hydrolyzed with 4% H2SO4 at 121°C for 1 hour followed by neutralization and then analyzed with HPLC.
Untreated or HCW-treated material was dried in vacuo at 40°C for 3 days before milling and then subjected to a Planetary Micro mill pulverisette 7 (Fritsch, Germany). The sample (1.0 g) was milled at 400 rpm in a 45-ml milling cup with seven spheres (ϕ = 15 mm). Milling was carried out for a total time of 10-120 minutes (with a cycle of 10-minute milling and 10-minute pausing) at room temperature.
Planetary mill pulverisette 5 (Fritsch, Germany) was used to prepare larger quantities of samples. The sample (25 g) was milled at 250 rpm in a 500-ml milling cup with 25 spheres (ϕ = 20 mm). Milling was carried out for a total time of 240 minutes (with a cycle of 10-minute milling and 10-minute pausing) at room temperature.
Enzymatic hydrolysis was performed using an enzyme cocktail constituting 1-40 FPU Acremonium cellulase (Meiji Seika Co, Japan), 0.02 ml Optimash BG (Genencor International, USA), and 5 IU Novozyme 188 (Novozymes, Denmark) per gram of dry substrate. In the standard assay, 1.0 ml of the enzyme cocktail (1-40 FPU/g substrate) in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was added to 0.01-0.05 g of pretreated materials in a 1.5-ml tube. The reaction mixture was incubated at 45°C for 72 hours mixed with a rotator. The experiment was performed in triplicate. In the assay using a high concentration of substrate, 100 ml of the enzyme cocktail (4 FPU/g substrate) in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was added to 0.2-20 g of pretreated materials. The reaction mixture was incubated at 45°C for 72 hour and mixed with a magnetic stirrer. The hydrolysate was centrifuged, and the supernatant was analyzed for glucose and xylose. The acetate production from BM-treated material was assayed using the standard mixture containing 20 mM MES buffer (pH 5.0) instead of 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0).
The filter paper activity (FPU) in Acremonium cellulase and the β-glucosidase activity (IU) in Novozyme 188 were measured according to the standard procedure recommended by the Commission on Biotechnology, IUPAC .
Xylanase activities in Acremonium cellulase and Optimash BG were assayed in a reaction mixture (1.0 ml) containing 1% (w/v) birch wood xylan (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and appropriately diluted enzyme solutions. After 30 minutes of incubation at 45°C, the reducing sugar liberated was measured using dinitrosalicylic acid. One unit of the enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that produces 1 μmol of reducing sugar per minute.
Glucose, xylose and acetate were analyzed using a HPLC system equipped with a refractive index detector (RI-2031Plus, JASCO, Japan). Glucose and xylose were analyzed using an Aminex HPX-87P column (7.8 mm I.D. × 30 cm, BioRad, USA) with a Carbo-P micro-guard cartridge. The mobile phase used was doubly deionized water, and the flow rate was 1.0 ml/minute at an 80°C column temperature. Acetate was analyzed using an Aminex HPX-87H column (7.8 mm I.D. × 30 cm, BioRad, USA) with a Cation H micro-guard cartridge. This column was maintained at 35°C, and acetate was eluted with 4 mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/minute.
Furfural and hydroxymethyl furfural were analyzed using a TSK gel ODS-80 Ts QA analytical column (4.6 mm I.D. × 15 cm, TOSOH, Japan) and a photodiode array UV-visible light detector (MD-1510, JASCO, Japan). The mobile phase used was 0.1% phosphate. The furfural compounds were eluted using linier gradient (0 to 6 minutes) with a 1:1 (vol/vol) mixture of 0.1% phosphate and 50% acetonitrile, and their peaks were detected at 275 nm. The flow rate was 1.0 ml/minute with a 40°C column temperature.
Crystallinities of the untreated and pretreated wood were measured using a Rigaku RINT-TTR3 X-ray diffractometer (Japan) with Cu Kα radiation at 50 kV and 300 mA. The diffraction spectra were taken using the θ-2θ method. Samples were scanned over the range of 2θ = 2-60° at a rate of 2°/minute. The definition of the CrI is
CrI (%) = [(I002 - Iam)/I002] × 100
in which I002 is the intensity of the crystalline peak at about 2θ = 22.5° and Iam is the intensity at 2θ = 18.7° (see ).
- Mosier N, Wyman CE, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M: Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96: 673-686. 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun Y, Cheng J: Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 2002, 83: 1-11. 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00212-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lynd LR, Elander RT, Wyman CE: Likely features and costs of mature biomass ethanol technology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1996, 57/58: 741-761.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J: Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: a tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotechnol Prog 1999, 15: 794-803. 10.1021/bp990107uView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY: Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96: 1959-1966. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duff SJB, Murray WD: Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol 1996, 55: 1-33. 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00122-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang B, Wyman CE: Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flowthrough pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 86: 88-95. 10.1002/bit.20043View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grous WR, Converse AO, Grethlein HE: Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on pore size and enzymatic hydrolysis of poplar. Enzyme Microb Technol 1986, 8: 274-280. 10.1016/0141-0229(86)90021-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shimizu K, Sudo K, Nagasawa S, Ishihara M: Enzymatic hydrolysis of woods. VII. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 1983, 29: 428-437.Google Scholar
- Ando H, Sakaki T, Kokusho T, Shibata M, Uemura Y, Hatate Y: Decomposition behavior of plant biomass in hot-compressed water. Ind Eng Chem Res 2000, 39: 3688-3693. 10.1021/ie0000257View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bouchard J, Nguyen TS, Chornet E, Overend RP: Analytical methodology for biomass pretreatment. Part 2: characterization of the filtrates and cumulative product distribution as a function of treatment severity. Bioresour Technol 1991, 36: 121-131. 10.1016/0960-8524(91)90169-KView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu C, Wyman CE: Partial flow of compressed-hot water through corn stover to enhance hemicellulose sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96: 1978-1985. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mok WS-L, Antal MJ: Uncatalyzed solvolysis of whole biomass hemicellulose by hot compressed liquid water. Ind Eng Chem Res 1992, 31: 1157-1161. 10.1021/ie00004a026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weil JR, Sarikaya A, Rau S-L, Goetz J, Ladisch CM, Brewer M, Hendrickson R, Ladisch MR: Pretreatment of yellow poplar sawdust by pressure cooking in water. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1997, 68: 21-40. 10.1007/BF02785978View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weil JR, Sarikaya A, Rau S-L, Goetz J, Ladisch CM, Brewer M, Hendrickson R, Ladisch LR: Pretreatment of corn fiber by pressure cooking in water. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1998, 73: 1-17. 10.1007/BF02788829View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schell DJ, Harwood C: Milling of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1994, 45/46: 159-168.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koullas DP, Christakopoulos P, Kekos D, Macris BJ, Koukios EG: Correlating the effect of pretreatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis of straw. Biotechnol Bioeng 1992, 39: 113-116. 10.1002/bit.260390116View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Millett MA, Effland MJ, Caulfietd DF: Influence of fine grinding on the hydrolysis of cellulosic materials - acid vs. enzymatic. Adv Chem Ser 1979, 181: 71-89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sinitsyn AP, Gusakov AV, Vlasenko EY: Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1991, 30: 43-59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tassinari T, Macy C, Spano L, Ryu DDY: Energy requirements and process design considerations in compression-milling pretreatment of cellulose wastes for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1980, 22: 1689-1705. 10.1002/bit.260220811View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang VS, Holtzapple MT: Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000, 84/86: 5-37. 10.1385/ABAB:84-86:1-9:5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tassinari T, Macy C, Spano L: Technology advances for continuous compression milling pretreatment of lignocellulosics for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1982, 24: 1495-1505. 10.1002/bit.260240704View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamanobe T, Hiraishi J, Kruus I: Improvement of fungal strain Y-94, a cellulolytic enzyme hyperproducer, and enzymatic saccharification of exploded wood. Agric Biol Chem 1990, 54: 535-536.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ago M, Endo T, Hirotsu T: Crystalline transformation of native cellulose from cellulose I to cellulose II polymorph by a ball-milling method with a specific amount of water. Cellulose 2004, 11: 163-167. 10.1023/B:CELL.0000025423.32330.faView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kabel MA, de Waard P, Scholsand HA, Voragen AGJ: Location of O -acetyl substituents in xylo-oligosaccharides obtained from hydrothermally treated Eucalyptus wood. Carbohydr Res 2003, 338: 69-77. 10.1016/S0008-6215(02)00351-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shatalov AA, Evtuguin DV, Neto CP: (2- O -α-D-galactopyranosyl-4- O -methyl-α-D-glucurono)-D-xylan from Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Carbohydr Res 1999, 320: 93-99. 10.1016/S0008-6215(99)00136-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polizeli MLTM, Rizzatti ACS, Monti R, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA, Amorim DS: Xylanases from fungi: properties and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005, 67: 577-591. 10.1007/s00253-005-1904-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd TA, Wyman CE: Combined sugar yields for dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96: 1967-1977. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch MR: Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96: 1986-1993. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vlasenko EY, Ding H, Labavitch JM, Shoemaker SP: Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated rice straw. Bioresour Technol 1997, 59: 109-119. 10.1016/S0960-8524(96)00169-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fuzimoto S, Minowa T, Inoue H, Sawayama S, Endo T: System study on non-sulfuric acid pretreatment for bio-ethanol production from lingo-cellulosic biomass. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of Japan Institute of Energy 2007, 189-199.Google Scholar
- Gharpuray MM, Lee YH, Fan LT: Structural modification of lignocellulosics by pretreatment to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1983, 25: 157-172. 10.1002/bit.260250113View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D: Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. NREL Biomass Program; 2005. [http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html#lap-002]Google Scholar
- Wood TM, Bhat KM: Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods Enzymol 1988, 160: 87-117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM: An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffreactometer. Text Res J 1959, 29: 786-794. 10.1177/004051755902901003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.