- Open Access
Increased isobutanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of genes in valine metabolism
© Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 18 November 2010
Accepted: 28 July 2011
Published: 28 July 2011
Isobutanol can be a better biofuel than ethanol due to its higher energy density and lower hygroscopicity. Furthermore, the branched-chain structure of isobutanol gives a higher octane number than the isomeric n-butanol. Saccharomyces cerevisiae was chosen as the production host because of its relative tolerance to alcohols, robustness in industrial fermentations, and the possibility for future combination of isobutanol production with fermentation of lignocellulosic materials.
The yield of isobutanol was improved from 0.16 to 0.97 mg per g glucose by simultaneous overexpression of biosynthetic genes ILV2, ILV3, and ILV5 in valine metabolism in anaerobic fermentation of glucose in mineral medium in S. cerevisiae. Isobutanol yield was further improved by twofold by the additional overexpression of BAT2, encoding the cytoplasmic branched-chain amino-acid aminotransferase. Overexpression of ILV6, encoding the regulatory subunit of Ilv2, in the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain decreased isobutanol production yield by threefold. In aerobic cultivations in shake flasks in mineral medium, the isobutanol yield of the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain and the reference strain were 3.86 and 0.28 mg per g glucose, respectively. They increased to 4.12 and 2.4 mg per g glucose in yeast extract/peptone/dextrose (YPD) complex medium under aerobic conditions, respectively.
Overexpression of genes ILV2, ILV3, ILV5, and BAT2 in valine metabolism led to an increase in isobutanol production in S. cerevisiae. Additional overexpression of ILV6 in the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain had a negative effect, presumably by increasing the sensitivity of Ilv2 to valine inhibition, thus weakening the positive impact of overexpression of ILV2, ILV3, and ILV5 on isobutanol production. Aerobic cultivations of the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain and the reference strain showed that supplying amino acids in cultivation media gave a substantial improvement in isobutanol production for the reference strain, but not for the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain. This result implies that other constraints besides the enzyme activities for the supply of 2-ketoisovalerate may become bottlenecks for isobutanol production after ILV2, ILV3, and ILV5 have been overexpressed, which most probably includes the valine inhibition to Ilv2.
Environmentally friendly production of biofuels is a target of great interest due to climate change and the need for renewable transportation fuels. Microbial production of chemicals to be used as liquid biofuels will allow the use of renewable raw materials such as lignocellulose. Optimally, biomass from agricultural and forestry waste products could be used as raw material.
Bioethanol is the most well established biofuel, with existing commercial production. Several pilot plants are in operation for lignocellulosic ethanol production in several countries. However, the chemical properties of ethanol, such as a high tendency to absorb water, are not optimal for all purposes. For many purposes, such as a jet fuel, improved properties are required with regard to hygroscopicity and energy density. Higher alcohols, such as n-butanol and isobutanol, represent possible alternatives. Compared with n-butanol, isobutanol has the advantage of having a higher octane number, and the possibility of usage outside the fuel industry as well .
Microbial production of isobutanol has been studied in food fermentations and alcoholic beverages for flavour profiling since the 1970s [2, 3]. In recent years, production of isobutanol has been investigated as a biofuel in engineered Escherichia coli to reach a concentration of 22 g/l during aerobic cultivations . However, as isobutanol concentrations over 15 g/l are toxic to E. coli , this concentration may also be close to the maximal possible production in this bacterium. Since Corynebacterium glutamicum is more tolerant to isobutanol than is E. coli, it was engineered as a host and produced about 4 g/l of isobutanol in the presence of oxygen . Yeast is well known to be tolerant to alcohols. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is tolerant to up to 20% ethanol . In a test of many microbial strains for butanol tolerance, baker's yeast S. cerevisiae and Lactobacilli were the only microbes able to grow in butanol concentrations higher than 20 g/l . In addition, yeast is relatively robust in other respects, commonly used in fermentations with harsh conditions, and its outstanding performance in lignocellulosic hydrolysates would enable future combination of the higher alcohol production with fermentation of lignocellulosic materials. Yeast naturally produces small amounts of higher alcohols through the degradation of amino acids [8, 9], such as isobutanol among others [2, 3]. These are of great importance in the flavour profiles of beer and wine, as they generate desired fruity aromas in these products when produced in favourable amounts. Use of a host that naturally produces isobutanol may in principle offer an opportunity to avoid the use of heterologous pathways, which often require extensive work for optimal expression. Because of all these advantages, S. cerevisiae is a potential alternative host for higher alcohol production.
Results and discussion
The objective of this work was to study isobutanol formation in S. cerevisiae, and to improve isobutanol production by metabolic engineering. We studied overexpression of the genes ILV2, ILV3, ILV5, ILV6, and BAT2, involved in valine metabolism, in different combinations, and investigated the isobutanol production in the constructed strains.
Improvement of anaerobic isobutanol production by overexpression of genes in valine metabolism
To overexpress the genes, ILV2, ILV3, and ILV5, which encode the catalysts for the conversion of pyruvate to 2-ketoisovalerate (direct precursor of L-valine), the coding regions were fused with the S. cerevisiae PGK1 promoter. The resulting PGK1-ILV2, PGK1-ILV3 and PGK1-ILV5 DNA fusion fragments were cloned into integration vectors YDp-L, YDp-W and YDp-H , respectively. The three resulting plasmids were linearised by cleavage of the ILV genes and successively integrated into the genome of CEN.PK 2-1C (MAT α leu2-3, 112 his3-Δ1 ura3-52 trp1-289 MAL2-8(Con) MAL3 SUC3) (a kind gift of P Kötter, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany The resulting strain was designated ILV235_XCY561 (ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain). Successful genomic integration was confirmed by analytical polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on chromosomal DNA. The copy number of the integrated gene was estimated by performing quantitative real-time PCR with genomic DNA as template [14, 15]. The estimates of the copy numbers of ILV2, ILV3 and ILV5 in ILV235_XCY561 given by the quantitative PCR were 4.1 ± 0.90, 2.1 ± 0.65 and 3.6 ± 1.12 times larger than those in the reference strain, respectively. Multiple integrations may have happened in some cases. The expression of ILV2, ILV3 and ILV5 at the transcriptional level in ILV235_XCY561 was also measured by quantitative real-time PCR. The mRNA levels of ILV2, ILV3 and ILV5 in ILV235_XCY561 measured by quantitative (qPCR) were 6.42 ± 2.20, 9.98 ± 1.31 and 3.24 ± 0.61 times larger than those in the reference strain, respectively. Overexpression of these three genes at mRNA level was proved. However, no enzymatic assays were performed to confirm the overexpression since the reagents needed are not commercially available.
Effects of gene overexpression on growth rates and product yields under anaerobic batch fermentationsa
ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strainb
ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 BAT2 overexpression strainb
ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 ILV6 overexpression strainb
Specific growth rate, per h
0.38 ± 0.02
0.29 ± 0.02
0.16 ± 0.01
0.18 ± 0.00
Biomass (CH1.78O0.6N0.19) yield, g/g glucose
0.10 ± 0.00
0.11 ± 0.01
0.07 ± 0.01
0.11 ± 0.00
Ethanol yield, g/g glucose
0.38 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.02
0.34 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.00
Pyruvate yield, g/g glucose
0.0011 ± 0.007
0.0016 ± 0.0007
0.0032 ± 0.0006
0.0028 ± 0.0001
Succinate yield, g/g glucose
0.0016 ± 0.0006
0.0006 ± 0.0001
0.0028 ± 0.0001
0.0035 ± 0.0003
Glycerol yield, g/g glucose
0.100 ± 0.008
0.087 ± 0.006
0.095 ± 0.001
0.099 ± 0.003
Acetate yield, g/g glucose
0.0076 ± 0.0014
0.0088 ± 0.0010
0.0110 ± 0.0006
0.0069 ± 0.0003
CO2 yield, g/g glucose
0.32 ± 0.01
0.39 ± 0.01
0.37 ± 0.04
0.41 ± 0.03
Carbon balance deviation,%b
5.9 ± 2.2
3.0 ± 4.0
10.9 ± 1.7
1.3 ± 1.7
The ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain had a maximum specific growth rate of 0.29 ± 0.02 per h, which was slower than the maximum specific growth rate of the reference strain, which was 0.38 ± 0.02 per h. The slower growth rate may be due to a metabolic imbalance caused by the overexpression of the ILV genes, which affects some amino acids pools, or due to insufficient expression of the selection markers, which were put at different loci and might not work with the same efficiency as at their wild type locations.
BAT2 encodes a branched-chain amino-acid aminotransferase, which catalyses the first reaction in the catabolism of valine in the cytosol . BAT2 is highly expressed during stationary phase and repressed during logarithmic growth, which is the opposite way of the regulation of the mitochondrial branched-chain amino-acid aminotransferase, encoded by BAT1 . It has been previously shown that overexpression of BAT2 alone increases isobutanol concentration in wine fermentations . We therefore decided to investigate whether BAT2 overexpression could complement the valine pathway overexpression and result in higher yields and concentrations of isobutanol.
Ilv6 is the regulatory subunit of acetolactate synthase and has been described as an enhancer of Ilv2 catalytic activity. To investigate whether ILV6 overexpression would further improve isobutanol production by possibly approaching equimolar amounts of both proteins, ILV6 was overexpressed in the strain background with ILV2, ILV3 and ILV5 overexpression. The resulting strain was designated ILV2356_XCY605, here also referred to as the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 ILV6 overexpression strain. The estimate of the copy number of ILV6 in ILV2356_XCY605 was 2.8 ± 1.67 times larger than that in the reference strain. We also estimated the copy number of ILV6 in ILV235BAT2_XCY715 and that of BAT2 in ILV2356_XCY605. Their copy numbers were 0.9 ± 0.31 and 1.0 ± 0.42 times, respectively, compared to the reference strain, which was in agreement with the fact that these two genes were not overexpressed in their respective strains. The overexpression of ILV6 at the transcriptional level in ILV2356_XCY605 was 8.07 ± 1.14 times larger than that in the reference strain. Unexpectedly, integration of the overexpression construct with ILV6 caused threefold less isobutanol production, namely 0.34 mg per g glucose (Figure 2), and a drop of the maximum specific growth rate to 0.18 ± 0.00 per h. The yields of the other measured products, that is, biomass, ethanol, pyruvate, succinate, glycerol, acetate and CO2 were largely unaffected (Table 1). We interpret the lower yield of isobutanol upon overexpression of ILV6 to be due to an increased sensitivity of Ilv2 to valine inhibition, weakening the positive impact of overexpression of ILV2, ILV3, and ILV5 on increasing isobutanol production in S. cerevisiae, since Ilv6 stimulates Ilv2 catalytic activity sevenfold to tenfold and confers Ilv2 sensitivity to valine inhibition [21, 22].
Influence of various media on isobutanol production and growth rate
Aerobic batch cultivations of the ILV2 ILV3 ILV 5 overexpression strain and reference strain in shake flasksa
Buffered mineral medium
YPD complex medium
ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain b
ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain
Specific growth rate, per h
0.36 ± 0.00
0.11 ± 0.00
0.52 ± 0.00
0.50 ± 0.00
Biomass (CH1.78O0.6N0.19) yield, g/g glucose
0.33 ± 0.06
0.14 ± 0.05
0.34 ± 0.00
0.35 ± 0.00
Ethanol yield, g/g glucose
0.22 ± 0.05
0.28 ± 0.10
0.12 ± 0.01
0.19 ± 0.02
Pyruvate yield, g/g glucose
0.0002 ± 0.0000
0.0002 ± 0.0000
0.0137 ± 0.0003
0.0134 ± 0.0005
Succinate yield, g/g glucose
0.20 ± 0.02
0.26 ± 0.01
0.02 ± 0.00
0.01 ± 0.00
Glycerol yield, g/g glucose
0.006 ± 0.006
0.026 ± 0.017
0.002 ± 0.000
0.013 ± 0.000
Acetate yield, g/g glucose
0.0000 ± 0.0000
0.0052 ± 0.0022
0.0929 ± 0.0047
0.0929 ± 0.0018
In this study, the isobutanol production yield was increased first by simultaneously overexpression genes, ILV2, ILV3 and ILV5 in valine biosynthetic pathway. However, which gene(s) out of these three is (are) needed to reach the same increased level of isobutanol yield, was not investigated in this study. Even though the isobutanol production yield was improved by ninefold by overexpression of ILV2, ILV3, ILV5, and BAT2, in valine biosynthetic and degradation pathways, the isobutanol production yield was still too low for commercial applications. The low production of isobutanol was probably due to the regulation control of valine production in mitochondria, which limited the flux toisobutanol. Moving the pathway from pyruvate to 2-ketoisovalerate from mitochondria to cytosol would benefit the production of isobutanol in yeast.
Isobutanol production yield on glucose was first increased from 0.16 to 0.97 mg isobutanol per gram of glucose by overexpression of genes ILV2, ILV3 and ILV5, which encode the catalysts for the conversion of pyruvate to 2-ketoisovalerate, the immediate precursor of valine. With the background of ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression, isobutanol yield was further improved twofold by overexpression of BAT2, encoding the catalyst for the first step of valine catabolism. Also with the background of the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression, overexpression of ILV6, encoding a regulatory subunit that combines with Ilv2, which catalyses the first committed step in valine biosynthesis, resulted in a threefold drop of the yield of isobutanol. We interpret this to be due to an increased sensitivity of Ilv2 to valine inhibition, weakening the positive impact of overexpression of ILV2, ILV3, and ILV5 on increasing isobutanol production.
Aerobic cultivation of the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain and the reference strain in shake flasks indicated that uptake of valine has the same effect on increasing the valine pool and thereby isobutanol production as on increasing the flux capacity from pyruvate to 2-ketoisovalerate by overexpression of the three genes. Thus, the enzyme activities for the supply of 2-ketoisovalerate were not a bottleneck any longer in the ILV2 ILV3 ILV5 overexpression strain. Other bottlenecks, such as the regulation of valine production, export of valine or 2-ketoisovalerate from mitochondria to cytosol, or the affinities of PDCs to 2-ketoisovalerate in cytosol, should be investigated in order to further increase the yield of isobutanol.
Media and culture conditions
The mineral medium, which was used in all anaerobic fermentations, had the following composition (per litre): (NH4)2SO4, 10 g; KH2PO4, 6 g; MgSO4·7H2O, 1 g; Antifoam 289 (A-5551; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), 0.2 ml; trace metal solution, 2 ml; vitamin solution, 2 ml; and ergosterol solution, 2 ml. This medium was supplemented with 40 g/l glucose and 0.1 g/l uracil. The trace metal solution consisted of the following (per litre): ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (sodium salt), 15.0 g; ZnSO4·7H2O, 4.5 g; MnCl2·2H2O, 0.84 g; CoCl2·6H2O, 0.3 g; CuSO4·5H2O, 0.3 g; Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.4 g; CaCl2·2H2O, 4.5 g; FeSO4·7H2O, 3 g; H3BO3, 1 g; and KI, 0.1 g. The vitamin solution contained the following (per litre): biotin, 0.05 g; p-aminobenzoic acid, 0.2 g; nicotinic acid, 1 g; calcium pantothenate, 1 g; pyridoxine-HCl, 1 g; thiamine-HCl, 1 g; and myo-inositol, 25 g. The ergosterol solution contained 2 g ergosterol and 84 g Tween 80 in 100 ml pure ethanol.
For the precultivations, 50 ml of mineral medium was used in 500 ml shake flasks, with the exception that 0.1 g/l uracil was added when necessary, and no ergosterol was used. The precultures were grown at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm and a start pH of 5.0.
All aerobic cultivations were performed in 500 ml baffled shake flasks with 100 ml of working volume of either buffered mineral medium or YPD complex medium. Buffered mineral medium contained (per litre): (NH4)2SO4, 15 g; KH2PO4, 28.8 g; MgSO4·7H2O, 1 g; Antifoam 289, 0.2 ml; trace metal solution, 4 ml; vitamin solution, 2 ml and 40 g glucose. The compositions of trace metal and vitamin solutions were as above, and 0.1 g/l uracil was used when necessary. The YPD complex medium contained, per litre, 10 g of yeast extract, 20 g of peptone, and 17 g glucose. The aerobic cultivations were carried out at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm and a start pH of 5.0.
Strains and strain construction
Plasmids and strains
Plasmid or strain
Source or reference
Cloning vector; Kmr
pUC9 derivative, with LEU2 marker
pUC9 derivative, with TRP1 marker
pUC9 derivative, with HIS3 marker
pUC9 derivative, with URA3 marker
pCR-Blunt II-TOPO with PGK1 promoter and ILV2 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae
pCR-Blunt II-TOPO with PGK1 promoter and ILV3 gene from S. cerevisiae
pCR-Blunt II-TOPO with PGK1 promoter and ILV5 gene from S. cerevisiae
pCR-Blunt II-TOPO with PGK1 promoter and ILV6 gene from S. cerevisiae
pCR-Blunt II-TOPO with PGK1 promoter and BAT2 gene from S. cerevisiae
Plasmid YDp-L with PGK1 promoter and ILV2
Plasmid YDp-W with PGK1 promoter and ILV3
Plasmid YDp-H with PGK1 promoter and ILV5
Plasmid YDp-U with PGK1 promoter and ILV6
Plasmid YDp-U with PGK1 promoter and BAT2
MAT α leu2-3, 112 his3-Δ1 ura3-52 trp1-289 MAL2-8(Con) MAL3 SUC3
MAT α SUC2 MAL2-8c ura3-52
MAT α MAL2-8c SUC2
CEN.PK 2-1C with YDp-H_P+ILV5, YDp-L_P+ILV2, and YDp-W_P+ILV3 inserted into the genome
CEN.PK 2-1C with YDp-H_P+ILV5, YDp-L_P+ILV2, YDp-W_P+ILV3, and YDp-U_P+BAT2 inserted into the genome.
CEN.PK 2-1C with YDp-H_P+ILV5, YDp-L_P+ILV2, YDp-W_P+ILV3, and YDp-U_P+ILV6 inserted into the genome
Primer sequence (5' to 3')
The generated blunt end fusion PCR products, PGK1+ILV2, PGK1+ILV3, PGK1+ILV5, PGK1+ILV6 or PGK1+BAT2, were cloned into the pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vector by using the Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). The resulting plasmids were designated pTOPO_P+ILV2, pTOPO_P+ILV3, pTOPO_P+ILV5, pTOPO_P+ILV6, and pTOPO_P+BAT2, respectively. The PGK1 promoter together with the target gene were cut out from these pTOPO clones, and ligated into vector YDp-L, YDp-W, YDp-H, YDp-U, and YDp-U , respectively. The resulting plasmids were designated YDp-L_P+ILV2, YDp-W_P+ILV3, YDp-H_P+ILV5, YDp-U_P+ILV6 and YDp-U_P+BAT2, respectively (Table 3). They were digested with Bgl II, Bgl II, Eco RI, Nar I and Eag I in the middle of gene ILV2, ILV3, ILV5, ILV6 and BAT2, respectively. The linearised plasmids were chromosomally integrated into yeast strain CEN.PK 2-1C (a kind gift of Peter Kötter, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany) in various combinations. The strain with plasmids YDp-L_P+ILV2, YDp-W_P+ILV3 and YDp-H_P+ILV5 integrated in the genome was designated ILV235_XCY561. The strain with plasmids YDp-L_P+ILV2, YDp-W_P+ILV3, YDp-H_P+ILV5 and YDp-U_P+ILV6 was designated ILV2356_XCY605. Two identical strains, independently isolated in the last step of construction, with plasmids YDp-L_P+ILV2, YDp-W_P+ILV3, YDp-H_P+ILV5 and YDp-U_P+BAT2 were designated ILV235BAT2_XCY715 and ILV235BAT2_XCY723, respectively. The genomic integration of the plasmid was confirmed by PCR amplifying PGK1+ILV2, PGK1+ILV3, PGK1+ILV5, PGK1+ILV6 or PGK1+BAT2 fragment from the genomic DNA of the constructed overexpression strains.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Quantitative real-time PCR was used for quantifying the copy number of the integrated gene and its transcriptional level in the overexpression strain.
Total genomic DNA isolation
The overexpression strains and the reference strain were cultivated with shaking in 10 ml YPD medium at 30°C overnight. The cells were harvested and lysed with 0.5 mm acid-washed glass beads in 200 μl of breaking buffer through 3 min of vortexing. The breaking buffer contained 2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-Cl and 1 mM EDTA with pH at 8.0. Then, 200 μl 1 × Tris/EDTA (TE) buffer, which contained 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA, was added to the lysed cells. After centrifugation at 12,000 g for 5 min, the supernatant was transferred into a new Eppendorf tube. The DNA in the supernatant was precipitated with 1 ml of 100% ethanol, washed with 1 ml of 70% ethanol twice, and resuspended in 50 μl sterile Milli-Q water. The quality and quantity of the isolated genomic DNA was measured using NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). The isolated gDNA with good purity and appropriate quantity was used as template for quantitative real-time PCR to determine the copy number of the integrated genes in the overexpression strains.
Total RNA isolation
The overexpression strains and the reference stain were cultivated aerobically in mineral medium in shake flasks. Cells were harvested when the optical density of the culture was between 4 and 6 at 600 nm. Total RNA was isolated using Tri Reagent LS from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) as recommended by manufacturer. The quality and quantity of the isolated RNA was measured using NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). Then DNase treatment was performed to the RNA samples by using deoxyribonuclease I from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). The cDNA was made using M-MuLV RNase H+ reverse transcriptase and random hexamer primer set provided by DyNAmoTM SYBR Green 2-Step qRT-PCR Kit from Finnzymes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). The negative control of reverse transcription was carried with the RNA, which was not treated by DNaseout. The cDNA and the negative controls were used as the template for quantitative real-time PCR to determine the transcriptional level of the target genes in the overexpression strains and the reference strain.
The primers used for amplifying the small parts of ILV2, ILV3, ILV5, ILV6, BAT2, and the reference gene ACT1, are listed in Table 3. The resulting PCR fragment sizes were 80, 74, 72, 76, 73 and 125 bp, respectively. The program used for quantitative PCR reactions was as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 10 s, annealing at 66°C for 30 s, fluorescence data collection, extension at 72°C for 30 s; final extension at 72°C for 10 min; melting curve from 65 to 95°C. The threshold cycles (C(t)s) were calculated with the set threshold value by using Mx3005P software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The ΔΔC(t) method was applied for the relative quantification of the copy numbers and the transcription of ILV2, ILV3, ILV5, ILV6, and BAT2 in the overexpression strains with respect to the reference strain.
All anaerobic batch fermentations were performed in triplicate in 2-l fermenters (Braun-Biostat B2, stirred tank, Braun Biotech, Melsungen, Germany) with a working volume of 1.5 l. The fermenter was inoculated with a preculture from a shake flask to an optical density of 0.05 at 600 nm. During cultivation the temperature was maintained at 30°C, agitation was set at 200 rpm, and sparging was kept at 1 l of pure nitrogen per min. pH was maintained at 5.0 by automatic addition of 2 N NaOH. The CO2 and O2 concentrations in the effluent gas from the fermenter were analysed by gas monitor (Innova 1311, Innova Airtech Instruments, Denmark). Samples were taken throughout the cultivation for optical density measurement, biomass dry weight determination, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Samples for GC analysis were taken when glucose was depleted (defined by the zero value of CO2 in the effluent gas).
Optical density was measured at 600 nm with a Shimadzu UV-Mini 1240 spectrophotometer, (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan). Dry weight of biomass was determined gravimetrically by filtration of a known volume of culture over a predried and weighed 0.45 μm-pore-size filter. The filter with biomass was rinsed with a twofold volume of 0.9% NaCl, dried in a microwave oven at 150 W for 20 min and weighed again.
The concentrations of glucose, pyruvate, acetate, succinate, glycerol, and ethanol were measured by using isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography with refractive Index detection on an Agilent 1100 system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with cooled autosampler (5°C). Separation was conducted on an Aminex HPX-87H ion-exclusion column, and 5 mM of H2SO4 as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min at 60°C was used. In all, 20 μl of sample was injected, and concentrations were determined against freshly prepared external standards.
Isobutanol was determined using static head space-gas chromatography on a PerkinElmer HS 40 head space sampler (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) connected to a Perkin Elmer PE Autosystem gas chromatograph (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a Flame Ionization Detector and 60 m, 0.25 mm ID, 1 μm, DB-5 capillary column. Samples (1 ml in 20 ml sealed head space vials) were equilibrated for 5 min at 60°C in the auto sampler. The temperature of the needle and the transfer line was 90°C. Helium carrier gas was used at 20 psi. The temperatures of the injector and the detector were set to 200°C and 250°C, respectively. The oven temperature program was 1 min at 60°C and then 10°C per min to 150°C.
Quantification had to be performed using standard addition, since the slope of the calibration curve in pure water was different from the one obtained by spiking the fermentation sample with standards. Standard addition was performed at three different levels using 50 μl isobutanol standard solutions to certain volume of sample solutions. The corresponding addition were 7% to 100%, 40% to 150%, and 57% to 300% extra isobutanol. The R2 values of the corresponding addition curves were in all cases larger than 0.96, and in most cases over 0.98. The initial isobutanol concentration was extrapolated by the readings changed before and after adding the standard solutions. Quantification of 2-methylbutanol and 3-methylbutanol was performed by using isobutanol as the internal standard. The response factor difference of 2-methylbutanol and 3-methylbutanol versus isobutanol were determined by calibration with mixtures of isobutanol, 2-methylbutanol and 3-methylbutanol spiked into the media blank, at different concentrations similar to the ones observed in real samples.
The authors would like to acknowledge Peter Kötter for providing the applied yeast strain CEN.PK 2-1C. Uffe Hasbro Mortensen is acknowledged for his support and valuable comments. Furthermore, we would like to thank Jesper Mogensen and Jette Jepmond Mortensen for expert technical assistance. The authors gratefully acknowledge a contribution to the fellowship for XC from the SC Van Foundation, Denmark.
- Connor MR, Liao JC: Microbial production of advanced transportation fuels in non-natural hosts. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009, 20: 307-315. 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.04.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cronk TC, Mattick LR, Steinkraus KH, Hackler LR: Production of higher alcohols during indonesian tape ketan fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979, 37: 892-896.Google Scholar
- Giudici P, Romano P, Zambonelli C: A biometric study of higher alcohol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Can J Microbiol 1990, 36: 61-64. 10.1139/m90-012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC: Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 2008, 451: 86-89. 10.1038/nature06450View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith KM, Cho KM, Liao JC: Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for isobutanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 87: 1045-1055. 10.1007/s00253-010-2522-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hohmann S: Osmotic adaptation in yeast-control of the yeast osmolyte system. In Molecular Mechanisms of Water Transport Across Biological Membranes. Volume 215. Edited by: Zeuthen T, Stein WD. Los Angeles, CA: Academic Press; 2002:149-188.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knoshaug EP, Zhang M: Butanol tolerance in a selection of microorganisms. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009, 153: 13-20. 10.1007/s12010-008-8460-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hazelwood LA, Daran JM, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT, Dickinson JR: The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74: 2259-2266. 10.1128/AEM.02625-07View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dickinson JR, Harrison SJ, Hewlins MJ: An investigation of the metabolism of valine to isobutyl alcohol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . J Biol Chem 1998, 273: 25751-25756. 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25751View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoshimoto H, Fukushige T, Yonezawa T, Sone H: Genetic and physiological analysis of branched-chain alcohols and isoamyl acetate production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002, 59: 501-508. 10.1007/s00253-002-1041-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larry Cameron Anthony, Aston, PA (US), Lixuan Lisa Huang, Hockessin, DE (US), Rick W. Ye, Hockessin, DE (US): Production of isobutanol in yeast mitochondria. Pub. No.: US 20100129886A1. Washington, DC, USA: US Patent Office; 2010Google Scholar
- Reid M. Renny Feldman, Highlands Ranch, CO (US), Uvini Gunavardena, Irvine, CA (US), Jun Urano, Aurora, CO (US), Peter Meinhold, Denver, CO (US), Aristos A. Aristidou, Highlands Ranch, CO (US), Catherine Asleson Dundon, Englewood, CO (US), Christopher Smith, Englewood, CO (US): Yeast organism producing isobutanol at high yield. Pub. No.: US 20090226991 A1. Washington, DC, USA: US Patent Office; 2009.Google Scholar
- Berben G, Dumont J, Gilliquet V, Bolle PA, Hilger F: The YDp plasmids: a uniform set of vectors bearing versatile gene disruption cassettes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Yeast 1991, 7: 475-477. 10.1002/yea.320070506View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira ID, Rosario VE, Cravo PV: Real-time quantitative PCR with SYBR Green I detection for estimating copy numbers of nine drug resistance candidate genes in Plasmodium falciparum . Malar J 2006, 5: 1. 10.1186/1475-2875-5-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yi CX, Zhang J, Chan KM, Liu XK, Hong Y: Quantitative real-time PCR assay to detect transgene copy number in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum ). Anal Biochem 2008, 375: 150-152. 10.1016/j.ab.2007.11.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kispal G, Steiner H, Court DA, Rolinski B, Lill R: Mitochondrial and cytosolic branched-chain amino acid transaminases from yeast, homologs of the myc oncogene-regulated Eca39 protein. J Biol Chem 1996, 271: 24458-24464. 10.1074/jbc.271.40.24458View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eden A, Simchen G, Benvenisty N: Two yeast homologs of ECA39, a target for c-Myc regulation, code for cytosolic and mitochondrial branched-chain amino acid aminotransferases. J Biol Chem 1996, 271: 20242-20245. 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20242View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lilly M, Bauer FF, Styger G, Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS: The effect of increased branched-chain amino acid transaminase activity in yeast on the production of higher alcohols and on the flavour profiles of wine and distillates. FEMS Yeast Res 2006, 6: 726-743. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00057.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sentheshanuganathan S: The mechanism of the formation of higher alcohols from amino acids by Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Biochem J 1960, 74: 568-576.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dickinson JR: Pathways of leucine and valine catabolism in yeast. Methods Enzymol 2000, 324: 80-92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cullin C, Baudin-Baillieu A, Guillemet E, Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O: Functional analysis of YCL09C: evidence for a role as the regulatory subunit of acetolactate synthase. Yeast 1996, 12: 1511-1518. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199612)12:15<1511::AID-YEA41>3.0.CO;2-BView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pang SS, Duggleby RG: Expression, purification, characterization, and reconstitution of the large and small subunits of yeast acetohydroxyacid synthase. Biochemistry 1999, 38: 5222-5231. 10.1021/bi983013mView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.