Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Two bifunctional enzymes from the marine protist Thraustochytrium roseum: biochemical characterization of wax ester synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase activity catalyzing wax ester and triacylglycerol synthesis

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels201710:185

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0869-y

©  The Author(s) 2017

  • Received: 5 May 2017
  • Accepted: 6 July 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Triacylglycerols (TAGs) and wax esters (WEs) are important neutral lipids which serve as energy reservoir in some plants and microorganisms. In recent years, these biologically produced neutral lipids have been regarded as potential alternative energy sources for biofuel production because of the increased interest on developing renewable and environmentally benign alternatives for fossil fuels. In bacteria, the final step in TAG and WE biosynthetic pathway is catalyzed by wax ester synthase/acyl coenzyme A (acyl-CoA):diacylglycerol acyltransferase (WS/DGAT). This bifunctional WS/DGAT enzyme is also a key enzyme in biotechnological production of liquid WE via engineering of plants and microorganisms. To date, knowledge about this class of biologically and biotechnologically important enzymes is mainly from biochemical characterization of WS/DGATs from Arabidopsis, jojoba and some bacteria that can synthesize both TAGs and WEs intracellularly, whereas little is known about WS/DGATs from eukaryotic microorganisms.

Results

Here, we report the identification and characterization of two bifunctional WS/DGAT enzymes (designated TrWSD4 and TrWSD5) from the marine protist Thraustochytrium roseum. Both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 comprise a WS-like acyl-CoA acyltransferase domain and the recombinant proteins purified from Escherichia coli Rosetta (DE3) have substantial WS and lower DGAT activity. They exhibit WS activity towards various-chain-length saturated and polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs and fatty alcohols ranging from C10 to C18. TrWSD4 displays WS activity with the lowest K m value of 0.14 μM and the highest k cat/K m value of 1.46 × 105 M−1 s−1 for lauroyl-CoA (C12:0) in the presence of 100 μM hexadecanol, while TrWSD5 exhibits WS activity with the lowest K m value of 0.96 μM and the highest k cat/K m value of 9.83 × 104 M−1 s−1 for decanoyl-CoA (C10:0) under the same reaction condition. Both WS/DGAT enzymes have the highest WS activity at 37 and 47 °C, and WS activity was greatly decreased when temperature exceeds 47 °C. TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 are insensitive to ionic strength and reduced WS activity was observed when salt concentration exceeded 800 mM. The potential of T. roseum WS/DGATs to establish novel process for biotechnological production of WEs was demonstrated by heterologous expression in recombinant yeast. Expression of either TrWSD4 or TrWSD5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae quadruple mutant H1246, which is devoid of storage lipids, resulted in the accumulation of WEs, but not any detectable TAGs, indicating a predominant WS activity in yeast.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates both in vitro WS and DGAT activity of two T. roseum WS/DGATs, which were characterized as unspecific acyltransferases accepting a broad range of acyl-CoAs and fatty alcohols as substrates for WS activity but displaying substrate preference for medium-chain acyl-CoAs. In vivo characterization shows that these two WS/DGATs predominantly function as wax synthase and presents the feasibility for production of WEs by heterologous hosts.

Keywords

  • WS/DGAT
  • Wax ester
  • Thraustochytrium roseum
  • Triacylglycerol
  • Substrate specificity
  • Kinetic parameters

Background

Triacylglycerols (TAGs) are the most common neutral lipids found in animal, plant, and eukaryotic microorganisms as lipid-based energy reserves. In bacteria, polyhydroxyalkanoic acids represent the most abundant class of neutral lipids, which were frequently described to accumulate among hydrocarbon-utilizing marine bacteria [1]. In contrast, storage lipids in the form of TAGs and wax esters (WEs) are less frequently found in prokaryotic bacteria. A few examples show that certain gram-positive bacteria of the actinomycetes group, belonging to the genera Rhodococcus, Mycobacteria, Nocardia, and Streptomyces, are able to synthesize and accumulate large quantities of TAGs [2–4]. Gram negative bacteria, such as Acinetobacter, and some genera of marine hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria such as Alcanivorax usually accumulate WEs together with small amounts of TAGs [5–7]. These lipid-producing microorganisms have high levels of neutral lipids usually under growth limiting condition such as nitrogen starvation [8, 9] or under conditions of unbalanced growth in the presence of abundant carbon source such as gluconate and petroleum hydrocarbons [10].

Microbial TAGs and WEs are major storage lipids accumulated within the cell, provide precursors for chemical industries, and can serve as the feedstock for renewable biofuels. In contrast to TAG consisting of a glycerol backbone esterified by three fatty acyl chains, WE is composed of fatty acid esterified to fatty alcohol, which would not cause the generation of glycerol as an undesirable by-product during the refinement of WEs to biodiesel [11]. Because WEs have a higher energy density than TAG-derived lipids, they could represent a superior feedstock for biodiesel production [12]. Currently, WEs have multiple important technical applications in a variety of areas such as medicine, cosmetics, and food industries, and have the potential for cost-effective and sustainable production of lubricants [12, 13]. Depending on the chain lengths and the degree of unsaturation of fatty acids and fatty alcohol components, WEs have different physical and chemical properties such as melting temperature, oxidation stability, and pressure stability [14]. Liquid WEs consisting of medium to long-chain monounsaturated fatty chains exhibit low melting-points and high oxidation stability, which renders it more suited for lubrication. Currently, the jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) oil is the major biological source of WEs for these commercial applications since the global ban of whale hunting. Unlike other oil storing plant seeds that accumulate large quantities of TAGs as energy reserves, the desert shrub jojoba’s seeds accumulate liquid WEs up to 60% of the seed dry weight, and these WEs are composed mainly C20:1 fatty acids and C20:1/C22:1 fatty alcohols, which generates a carbon chain length of C38–C44 [15]. However, considering the high price and limited supply of jojoba oil due to the low yield and high cost for cultivating jojoba plant, there is still a strong need for an alternative cost-effective solution for sustainable production of WEs [12]. Recent engineering efforts show that other oilseed plants such as Camelina sativa have attracted attention as a promising biological platform form cost-effective production of WEs [12–14, 16, 17].

Reconstruction of WE biosynthetic pathway is required for metabolic engineering of heterologous hosts to produce WEs. The pathway for WE biosynthesis has been well studied in the jojoba plant and certain bacteria that accumulate WEs intracellularly as insoluble inclusions. In Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1, WE biosynthesis is catalyzed by three different enzymes: an NADPH-dependent long-chain acyl-CoA reductase catalyzing the reduction of long-chain acyl-CoA to form the fatty aldehyde intermediate, an unidentified NADPH-dependent fatty aldehyde reductase catalyzing the subsequent reduction of fatty aldehyde to fatty alcohol, and the wax ester synthase/acyl-CoA diacylglycerol acyltransferase (WS/DGAT) that catalyzes the esterification of fatty alcohol and acyl-CoA to form the WE [5, 18]. In contrast to bacteria, a bifunctional NADPH-dependent fatty acyl-CoA reductase directly synthesizes fatty alcohol from acyl-CoA in the jojoba plant, which do not lead to the formation of fatty aldehyde intermediate [6, 19]. In the bacterium Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1, the final step of TAG bioassembly, which involves sequential acylation of the glycerol backbone by three sn-specific acyltransferases, is also catalyzed by the WS/DGAT enzyme [5]. The activity of WS/DGAT acting as a bifunctional enzyme is thus shared by both WE and TAG biosynthesis pathways in some bacteria accumulating intracellularly these two different types of neutral lipids at the same time. However, in most microorganisms storing TAGs as the only neutral lipids, the terminal reaction of TAG biosynthesis is usually catalyzed by acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT; EC 3.2.1.20) [20]. DGAT transfers an acyl group from acyl-CoA to the sn-3 position of 1,2-DAG to form TAG. DGATs form a large family of acyltransferases, and two major types of membrane-bound DGAT enzymes, designated DGAT1 and DGAT2, have been identified in most eukaryotic organisms [21].

Although both DGAT and WS/DGAT possess acyltransferase activity, DGAT enzyme family members do not show protein sequence similarities with the WS/DGAT family members. Moreover, the WS/DGAT enzyme family members share very low overall similarity of amino acid sequences between not only homologs from different species but also homologs within the same species [22]. A number of WS/DGAT enzymes have been identified in plants, animal, and bacteria, with bacterial WS/DGATs representing the largest number of this acyltransferase family [20, 23]. Biochemical characterization of WS/DGATs from bacteria and the jojoba plant shows that WS/DGAT is an rather unspecific enzyme, which is demonstrated by its activity in the WS and/or DGAT reaction towards a broad range of different substrates including saturated and unsaturated acyl-CoAs and fatty alcohols ranging from C12 to C24 in carbon chain length [24, 25]. This promiscuous characteristic of substrate selectivity of WS/DGATs might be not desirable for specific biotechnological application such as the engineering of WE synthesis in oil crops or microorganisms to produce WEs with tailored chemical composition. However, recent study demonstrates that modification of a specific residue in WS/DGAT enzymes from the bacteria Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8 and Acinetobacter baylyi could alter fatty alcohol selectivity and kinetic parameters [22]. It shows the potential of rational modification of the already known WS/DGAT enzymes in improving the characteristics of WS/DGAT enzyme activity directed towards specific substrates. On the other hand, the potential for the isolation and discovery of novel genes encoding WS/DGAT enzymes has been recently explored from terrestrial and marine environments [26]. Using molecular method, a number of novel genes encoding putative WS/DGAT proteins from lipid-accumulating bacteria have been identified in marine sediments and soil, which further broadens the diversity of bacterial WS/DGAT enzymes. In contrast to the diversity of WS/DGATs found in a number of bacterial species and the extensive studies on WS/DGATs from bacteria and plants, WS/DGAT enzyme is very rarely reported so far in eukaryotic microorganisms. Here, we report the identification of two bifunctional WS/DGAT proteins from the marine protist Thraustochytrium roseum, which may be the first description of WS/DGAT proteins found in marine eukaryotic protist. We also report the biochemical characteristics of these two bifunctional WS/DGAT enzymes with both WS and DGAT activity using in vivo and in vitro assays.

Results

Sequence analysis of two putative WS/DGAT enzymes from the protist T. roseum

Thraustochytrium roseum was phylogenetically classified into Thraustochytrids that are a group of marine heterotrophic protists characterized by the presence of an ectoplasmic net, a sagenogenetosome and a cell wall that is composed of non-cellulosic scales [27]. In the fatty acid profile of T. roseum, docosahexasaenoic acid (22:6, 46%), palmitic acid (16:0, 26%), oleic acid (18:1, 12%), and stearic acid (18:0, 8%) are the major fatty acids [28]. Having high content of DHA, T. roseum was thus considered to be a promising alternative to marine fish oils rich in omega-3 very long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. T. roseum also accumulates large amounts of triacylglycerols (TAGs) within the cell during the stationary growth phase. We have sequenced the genome of T. roseum (ATCC28210), and genome annotation indicates that the T. roseum genome encodes at least three putative acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGATs), which catalyze the final step of acyl-CoA-dependent TAG biosynthesis. Full-length cDNA sequences of these three acyltransferases were amplified with RT-PCR based on the corresponding DNA sequences which were retrieved from the assembled T. roseum genome sequence. Of the three putative DGATs from T. roseum, one shares 100% identity in the deduced amino acid sequence with the previously reported TaDGAT2, which has been identified as a type 2 DGAT enzyme in the oleaginous marine protist Thraustochytrium aureum [29]. We performed BLAST against the appropriate GenBank divisions using the deduced amino acid sequences of the other two putative DGAT proteins, and observed a hit of the wax synthase-like acyltransferase domain. These two putative DGAT proteins from T. roseum were thus designated TrWSD4 and TrWSD5, and the corresponding coding sequences were deposited in GenBank (TrWSD4 Accession Number: MF037228; TrWSD5 Accession Number: MF037229). Furthermore, we constructed a phylogenetic tree using the amino acid sequences of TrWSD4, TrWSD5 and other 18 acyltransferases representing the different families of DGAT1, DGAT2, WS/DGAT, and MGAT (monoacylglycerol acyltransferase). As shown in Fig. 1a, the 20 acyltransferases from various organisms are clearly divided and grouped into four families, of which both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 fall into the WS/DGAT family. We postulated that TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 might encode a WS/DGAT enzyme. Further phylogenetic analysis of WS/DGATs from plant, bacteria, and T. roseum WS/DGATs showed that T. roseum WS/DGATs are separated from other WS/DGATs and form a new cluster consisting of only TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 with 87% bootstrap support (Additional file 1: Figure S1). This observation may suggest a distinct evolutionary origin of T. roseum WS/DGATs from that of plant and bacterial WS/DGATs.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Sequence analysis of Thraustochytrium roseum WS/DGAT proteins TrWSD4 and TrWSD5. a Phylogenetic relationships among the deduced amino acid sequences of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 proteins and the MGAT, DGAT1, DGAT2, and WS/DGAT family proteins (shaded in different colors) from a variety of organisms. The phylogenetic tree was constructed according to the Neighbor-Joining algorithm. GenBank accession numbers are shown by following the corresponding species name. Numbers at branch points are bootstrap percentages derived from 1000 replicates. b Predicted domains and motifs of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5. The WES_acyltransf (wax ester synthase-like Acyl-CoA acyltransferase) and DUF1298 (protein of unknown function) domains are shown by green and blue squares. The putative transmembrane domain of TrWSD5 and coiled coil domain of TrWSD4 are shown by red and purple squares. c The conserved HHXXXDG motif of WS/DGAT family members and the substitutions of serine (TrWSD4) and aspartate (TrWSD5) at the first residue of the motif are shown. Domain organization was predicted using HMMER (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/hmmer/) and the sequence alignment was created with the BioEdit software

Search of protein database using the deduced amino acid sequences of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 revealed a limited similarity with other WS/DGATs from plant and bacteria (23–29% identity). However, the deduced amino acid sequences of both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 contain a wax synthase-like acyltransferase domain and a DUF1298 domain with unknown function (Fig. 1b). In addition, the presence of a coiled coil domain at the N-terminus of TrWSD4 was observed and TrWSD5 has a predicted transmembrane region at the C-terminus (residues 472–494). Both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 contain the conserved acyltransferase active-site motif (HHXXXDG), whose first histidine residue is substituted to serine and aspartate, respectively (Fig. 1c). However, the second histidine residue of the acyltransferase motif is strictly conserved, which is essential for catalytic activity in non-ribosomal peptide bond formation [5].

Acyl-CoA specificity of TrWSD4 WS activity

To examine the biochemical activity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 proteins, we overexpressed the T. roseum WS/DGAT protein in-frame with a C-terminal 6-histidine (His6) tag in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) cells. The recombinant proteins of soluble TrWSD4-His6 and TrWSD5-His6 were purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography. Growing the induced bacterial cultures of 200 mL at 37 °C could allow us to obtain about 200–600 μg of nearly pure soluble proteins (Fig. 2a, b). We first used the purified TrWSD4-His6 and TrWSD5-His6 to confirm their acyltransferase activity by monitoring the time-dependent increases in A 412. When acyl-CoA and fatty alcohol were used as substrates, WS activity could be measured using the coupled reaction of DTNB and free CoA released during the reaction of esterification of these two substrates [30]. Figure 2c and d shows the influence of various TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 concentrations at a constant concentration of palmitoyl-CoA (90 μM) and hexadecanol (100 μM). Although nearly linear time-dependent increase in A 412 values was observed, absorbance values leveled off during the 60-min time course for TrWSD4 amounts exceeding 12 μg and TrWSD5 amounts exceeding 8 μg, respectively. Although the varied concentrations of TrWSD4 and TWSD5 concentrations were proportional to the rate of increase in A 412 values, the protein concentrations had no influence on maximum A 412 values, which reflected the constant total concentration of palmitoyl-CoA (90 μM) hydrolyzed in the esterification reaction. Figure 2e, f demonstrates the WS activity of T. roseum WS/DGATs at fixed amounts of 5 μg as functions of various palmitoyl-CoA concentrations. In contrast to the case of varied protein concentrations in Fig. 2c, d, maximal A 412 values varied in proportion to the concentrations of palmitoyl-CoAs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

WS activity of recombinant TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 proteins purified from E. coli. The purified TrWSD4-6 × His (a) and TrWSD5-6 × His (b) were subjected to electrophoresis on a 12% Tris–HCl, SDS–polyacrylamide gel. The time-dependent CoA release catalyzed by TrWSD4 (c) and TrWSD5 (d) was monitored at A 412 for various protein concentrations: 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 μg. The concentrations of substrates palmitoyl-CoA (90 μM) and hexadecanol (100 μM) were constant. The time-dependent CoA release by 5 μg TrWSD4 (e) or 5 μg TrWSD5 (f) of varied palmitoyl-CoA concentrations: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 μM. The concentration of hexadecanol (100 μM) was constant. Reactions were performed at 37 °C in mixtures including 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1 mg/mL DTNB

We next explored the capability of TrWSD4 to synthesize WEs at 37 °C by catalyzing the esterification of various acyl-CoA molecular species with hexadecanol (16:0-OH) (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Saturation curves for various saturated acyl-CoAs with carbon chain lengths that varied from 8 to 18 are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2a, b and c. Values of K m and V max, k cat and k cat/K m are summarized in Table 1. Unlike the saturation curves of shorter and longer chain acyl-CoAs (i.e., 8:0-CoA, 10:0-CoA, 12:0-CoA, 16:0-CoA, and 18:0-CoA), values of V 0 for myristoyl-CoA increased up to concentration of 15 μM and then declined (Additional file 2: Figure S2b). While the value of V 0 for oleoyl-CoA and palmitoyl-CoA could increase up to the value exceeding 26 nmol/mg/min, the values of V 0 for other acyl-CoAs increased to no more than 15 nmol/mg/min with the increase of substrate concentration (Additional file 2: Figure S2c). Saturation curves for three polyunsaturated fatty acyl-CoAs are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2d. In contrast to the values of V 0 for those saturated acyl-CoAs, the values of V 0 for 18:3-CoA, 20:4-CoA, and 20:5-CoA were increased in proportion to substrate concentrations. On the basis of this observation, the values of K m and V max were determined using the modified form of the Michaelis–Menten equation, which incorporates substrate inhibition and are listed together with the values of k cat and k cat/K m in Table 1. While the K m values for polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs were greatly higher than saturated medium- and long-chain acyl-CoAs, the lowest K m value was observed for lauroyl-CoA (C12:0), which suggests a strong preference of TrWSD4 for lauroyl-CoA.
Table 1

Kinetic parameters for TrWSD4-catalyzed esterification of hexadecanol and different acyl-CoAs

Substrate

K m (μM)

V max (nmol/min per mg)

k cat (s−1)

k cat/K m (M−1 s−1)

Octanoyl-CoA (C8:0)

29.93

14.76

1.85 × 10−2

6.19 × 102

Decanoyl-CoA (C10:0)

17.6

12.24

1.54 × 10−2

8.73 × 102

Lauroyl-CoA (C12:0)

0.14

16.08

2.02 × 10−2

1.46 × 105

Myristoyl-CoA (C14:0)

3.94

20.22

2.54 × 10−2

6.44 × 103

Palmitoyl-CoA (C16:0)

3.08

25.49

3.20 × 10−2

1.04 × 104

Stearoyl-CoA (C18:0)

19.15

30.23

3.79 × 10−2

1.98 × 103

Octadecatrienoyl-CoA (C18:3)

280.86

18.80

2.36 × 10−2

8.40 × 101

Arachidonoyl-CoA (C20:4)

297.17

11.82

1.48 × 10−2

4.99 × 101

Eicosapentaenoyl-CoA (C20:5)

131.16

9.05

1.14 × 10−2

8.66 × 101

Acyl-CoA specificity of TrWSD5 WS activity

We also tested the capability of TrWSD5 to synthesize WE at 37 °C by catalyzing the esterification of various acyl-CoA molecular species with hexadecanol (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Saturation curves for various saturated acyl-CoAs with chain lengths that varied from 8 to 18 are shown in Additional file 3: Figure S3a–c. Values of K m and V max, k cat and k cat/K m are summarized in Table 2. By contrast to the saturation curves for other acyl-CoAs, an effect of substrate inhibition was observed for oleoyl-CoA. The value of V 0 for oleoyl-CoA increased up to concentration of 30 μM and then declined (Additional file 3: Figure S3c). The increase in the values of V 0 for short-chain acyl-CoAs (C8:0 and C10:0) only occurred with the increase in the substrate concentration until it reaches saturated at 45 μM (Additional file 3: Figure S3a). The maximum of the value of V 0 was observed up to 179 nmol/mg/min for myristoyl-CoA (C14:0) and 165 nmol/mg/min for palmitoyl-CoA (C16:0) when substrate concentration reaches 90 and 75 μM, respectively (Additional file 3: Figure S3b, c). Saturation curves for three polyunsaturated fatty acyl-CoAs are shown in Additional file 3: Figure S3d and e. The values of V 0 for 18:3-CoA, 20:4-CoA, and 20:5-CoA were linearly increased in proportion to the increase in substrate concentration. Based on V i of the WS activity towards various saturated and polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs at different substrate concentrations, kinetic parameters for WS activity of TrWSD5 were calculated and listed in Table 2. Similar to that of TrWSD4, the highest K m values were observed for the three polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs. The lowest K m value was observed for decanoly-CoA (C10:0), indicating the preference of TrWSD5 for this medium-chain acyl-CoA species.
Table 2

Kinetic parameters for TrWSD5-catalyzed esterification of hexadecanol and different acyl-CoAs

Substrate

K m (μM)

V max (nmol/min per mg)

k cat (s−1)

k cat/K m (M−1 s−1)

Octanoyl-CoA (C8:0)

12.25

63.92

1.02 × 10−1

8.33 × 103

Decanoyl-CoA (C10:0)

0.96

58.91

9.41 × 10−2

9.83 × 104

Lauroyl-CoA (C12:0)

25.93

151.9

2.43 × 10−1

9.37 × 103

Myristoyl-CoA (C14:0)

18.5

207.4

3.31 × 10−1

1.79 × 104

Palmitoyl-CoA (C16:0)

24.77

213.4

3.41 × 10−1

1.37 × 104

Stearoyl-CoA (C18:0)

75.87

378.5

6.04 × 10−1

7.96 × 103

Octadecatrienoyl-CoA (C18:3)

284.68

151.52

2.42 × 10−1

8.50 × 102

Arachidonoyl-CoA (C20:4)

226.35

103.09

1.65 × 10−1

7.29 × 102

Eicosapentaenoyl-CoA (C20:5)

106.2

311.7

4.98 × 10−1

4.69 × 103

Effect of temperature on WS activity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5

The effect of different temperatures was observed on the WS enzyme activity of both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5. The V i was calculated at all six different temperatures (7, 17, 27, 37, 47, and 57 °C) and plotted against the temperatures. The graph shows a regular pattern of enzymatic reaction, which is optimal at the temperature of 47 and 37 °C for TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 (Fig. 3a, b), respectively. The WS activity of TrWSD4 was gradually increased when the temperature was increased from 7 to 47 °C, while decreased to 92% of the highest enzyme activity when the temperature reaches 57 °C (Fig. 3a). By contrast, the lowest WS activity of TrWSD5 was observed at the lowest and the highest temperatures tested in this assay. The enzyme activity of TrWSD5 appears to be stable when the temperature increased from 17 to 47 °C (Fig. 3b). These data suggest that higher temperature or lower temperature inhibits the WS enzyme activity of both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5, and the optimal temperature for a high WS activity of these two WS/DGAT enzymes may be 37 °C. We further characterized the kinetics of WS activity of T. roseum WS/DGATs at temperatures ranging from 17 to 37 °C (Fig. 3c, d; Additional file 4: Figure S4a, b). Additional file 4: Figure S4a, b demonstrates the influence of increasing temperature on saturation curves using palmitoyl-CoA and hexadecanol as substrates. Figure 3c, d shows the influence of temperature on the K m and V max. The values of V max were not greatly influenced by increasing temperature, while the temperature had substantial influence on the K m values. The value of K m for TrWSD4 decreased five-fold, whereas the value of K m for TrWSD5 increased 2.3-fold when the temperatures increased from 17 to 37 °C.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Effects of temperature and ionic strength on WS activity of Thraustochytrium roseum WS/DGAT proteins TrWSD4 and TrWSD5. The effect of temperature on the relative WS activity of TrWSD4 (a) and TrWSD5 (b) was observed. WS activity was determined with the substrates of 90 μM palmitoyl-CoA and 100 μM hexadecanol. The relative WS activity was calculated at different temperatures by taking the WS activity at 37 °C as 100%. The influence of temperature on the values of kinetic parameters K m and V max for TrWSD4- (c) and TrWSD5- (d) catalyzed reaction was observed. The value of fold change was calculated at different temperatures by taking the value at 17 °C as 1.0. Reactions were performed in mixtures including 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1 mg/mL DTNB. The effect of ionic strength on the WS activity of TrWSD4 (e) and TrWSD5 (f) was observed at the reaction temperature of 37 °C. WS activity was determined with the substrates of 90 μM decanoyl-CoA and 100 μM hexadecanol for a wide range of NaCl concentrations relative to the reaction without addition of NaCl. Reactions were performed at 37 °C in mixtures including 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 1 mg/mL DTNB and different concentrations of NaCl. WS activity values are averages of a representative experiment performed in triplicate and error bars correspond to one standard deviation (S.D.)

Effect of ionic strength on WS activity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5

To further characterize the WS activity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5, we tested the effect of increasing salt concentration on the WS enzyme activity. The influence of NaCl concentration on the WS activity was studied using different NaCl concentrations (0, 400, 800, 1200, 1600 mM) in the assay buffer. The WS activity at different NaCl concentrations was measured and relative enzyme activity was calculated. The WS activity of TrWSD4 was gradually declined with the increase in NaCl concentration from 0 to 1.6 M, and the WS activity was almost influenced when the NaCl concentration was increased up to 400 mM (Fig. 3e). The increase in the WS activity of TrWSD5 was observed from 0 to 800 mM NaCl concentration while afterwards from 800 to 1600 mM a gradual decrease in the WS activity was observed (Fig. 3f). TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 show the maximum WS enzyme activity at NaCl concentrations of 400 and 800 mM, respectively. The results indicate the ionic strength-dependent variation in the WS activity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 and the relative stability of the WS activity when salt concentration is not in excess of 400 mM for TrWSD4 and 800 mM for TrWSD5.

Alcohol specificities of T. roseum WS/DGATs

We also detected WS activity of both T. roseum WS/DGATs using palmitoyl-CoA and different linear alcohols as substrates. TrWSD4 accepted four linear alcohols as substrates and the highest WS activity was observed for octadecanol (C18:0-OH), which is two-fold higher than the activity using decanol as substrate (C18:0-OH) (Fig. 4a). Four linear alcohols were also utilized by TrWSD5 with almost equal activity (Fig. 4b). These data demonstrate that T. roseum WS/DGATs have WS activity towards a broad range of medium- and long-chain linear alcohols.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Substrate specificity of WS and DGAT activities of Thraustochytrium roseum WS/DGAT proteins TrWSD4 and TrWSD5. Alcohol specificity of WS activity of TrWSD4 (a) and TrWSD5 (b) was determined by using the substrates of 30 μM palmitoyl-CoA and 100 μM linear alcohols of different chain lengths. Reactions were performed at 37 °C in mixtures including 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1 mg/mL DTNB. The DGAT activity of TrWSD4 (c) and TrWSD5 (d) relative to WS activity of the corresponding recombinant enzyme is shown as percentage. The purified recombinant enzymes were used for WS and DGAT activity assays with the substrates of 15 μM palmitoyl-CoA together with 100 μM hexadecanol (WS activity) or 100 μM DAG (DGAT activity). Acyl-CoA specificity of DGAT activity of TrWSD4 (e) and TrWSD5 (f) was determined by using the substrates of DAG (100 μM) and acyl-CoAs with different chain lengths. Reactions were performed at 37 °C in mixtures including 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1 mg/mL DTNB. Data represent mean values of three replicates ±S.D

DGAT activity of T. roseum WS/DGATs

To verify that TrWSD4 or TrWSD5 is indeed a bifunctional enzyme with WS and DGAT activity, we first used the recombinant proteins purified from E. coli to measure their DGAT activity. We tested the DGAT activity by monitoring the change of A 412 when the purified recombinant protein was added in the assay in the presence of palmitoyl-CoA and DAG (16:0/16:0), which is different from the measurement of the WS activity when palmitoyl-CoA and 16:0-OH were used as substrates. As shown in Fig. 4c and d, the DGAT activity of TrWSD4 was 33% of the WS activity (Fig. 4c), while the DGAT activity of TrWSD5 was 58% of its WS activity (Fig. 4d). This result demonstrates that both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 exhibit a WS activity as well as a lower DGAT activity. We also measured the DGAT activity of both T. roseum WS/DGATs using DAG and different acyl-CoAs as substrates. As shown in Fig. 4e, f, both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 exhibited comparable DGAT activity towards medium- and long-chain saturated acyl-CoAs.

In vivo characterization of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 using heterologous expression in yeast

We further tested the ability of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 to synthesize WEs or TAG by heterologous expression in the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) mutant H1246 which is deficient in storage lipid biosynthesis [31]. We cloned the TrWSD4 or TrWSD5 into the yeast expression vector pESC-Ura and induced its expression by the addition of galactose in the presence of palmitic acid and hexadecanol in the yeast culture. TLC analysis of the lipids extracted from the recombinant yeast harboring the empty pESC-URA plasmid revealed that these cells accumulated neither WEs nor triacylglycerols (TAGs) when supplemented with palmitic acid together with hexadecanol (Fig. 5a, lanes 1–3). In contrast, the formation of WEs was observed when yeast cells were cultured in inducible medium containing palmitic acid together with hexadecanol (Fig. 5a, lanes 4–6). Similar results were observed for the yeast cells expressing TrWSD5 (Fig. 5b). Unlike WE biosynthesis, heterologous expression of either TrWSD4 or TrWSD5 did not lead to the formation of detectable amounts of TAGs under any conditions tested in our study. We isolated and purified WEs generated in these experiments from yeast total lipids by preparative TLC and determined their molecular structures using GC–MS analysis. Heterologous expression of TrWSD4 led to the formation of WEs consisting of hexadecyl myristate (C30) and hexadecyl palmitate (C32) (Additional file 5: Figure S5a, b), whereas WEs isolated from total lipids of recombinant yeast expressing TrWSD5 contained hexadecyl laurate (C28), hexadecyl myristate (C30) and hexadecyl palmitate (C32) as well as ethyl palmitate (Additional file 5: Figure S5c–f). The presence of C28 and C30 WEs as wells as ethyl palmitate in addition to hexadecyl palmitate in the WE products indicates that T. roseum WS/DGATs not only utilized exogenously supplemented palmitic acid as substrate but also had the capability to utilize lauryol-CoA (C12:0), myristoyl-CoA (C14:0), and even ethanol, which were from lipid and glucose metabolism in host yeast, leading to the formation of a WE mixture.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

TLC analysis of neutral lipids synthesized in recombinant yeast mutant H1246. a WE synthesis in recombinant yeast H1246 expressing TrWSD4. WEs and TAG are shown as reference lipid standards. 1–3, lipid samples extracted from three independent yeast transformants H1246:pESC-URA fed with 0.1% (w/v) palmitic acid together with 0.1% (w/v) hexadecanol; 4–6, lipid samples extracted from three independent yeast transformants H1246:TrWSD4 fed with 0.1% (w/v) palmitic acid together with 0.1% (w/v) hexadecanol. b WE synthesis in recombinant yeast H1246 expressing TrWSD5. WEs and TAG are shown as reference lipid standards. 1–3, lipid samples extracted from three independent yeast transformants H1246:pESC-URA fed with 0.1% (w/v) palmitic acid together with 0.1% (w/v) hexadecanol; 4–6, lipid samples extracted from three independent yeast transformants H1246:TrWSD5 fed with 0.1% (w/v) palmitic acid together with 0.1% (w/v) hexadecanol

Discussion

In this study, we identified two WS/DGAT proteins from the marine protist Thraustochytrium roseum which possess both acyl-CoA-dependent WS and DGAT activities. The protist Euglena gracilis was found to accumulate WEs under anaerobic conditions [32] but the putative WS/DGAT enzyme has not been reported so far. Our study may thus represent the firstly identified bifunctional WS/DGAT acyltransferases from eukaryotic microorganisms. Despite the low similarity in amino acid sequences of these two WS/DGAT proteins with other reported WS/DGAT proteins, the highly conserved acyltransferase domain HHXXXDG is found in the N-terminal regions of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 (Fig. 1c). Substitution of the first conserved histidine in the acyltransferase domain with serine in TrWSD4 and aspartate in TrWSD5 may not affect their WS and DGAT acyltransferase activities as our in vitro activity assay using their purified combinant enzymes shows their bifunctional acyltransferase activities (Figs. 2, 4). Similar substitution was also observed in other WS/DGATs from bacteria such as Mycobacteria tuberculosis RV2484c, Mycobacteria smegmatis Wdh3563-3, and Streptomycetes SCO1280 [33]. Mutagenesis of serine in TrWSD4 or aspartate in TrWSD5 to the conserved histidine may show whether the first residue in the conserved domain is responsible for some enzymatic properties such as substrate selectivity of WS/DGAT. Further sequence analysis based on phylogeny of the WS/DGAT family of acyltransferases suggests that these two Thraustochytrium WS/DGAT proteins form a new branch of WS/DGAT acyltransferases, which may have a different origin from those bacterial WS/DGATs.

The identity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 was further supported by in vitro assay using the purified recombinant proteins expressed in E. coli and functional expression study in the yeast mutant H1246. Both in vitro assay and in vivo characterization demonstrated the WS activity of these two Thraustochytrium WS/DGAT proteins, whereas only in vitro assay showed their DGAT activity since no any detectable amounts of TAG were observed in recombinant yeast mutant expressing either TrWSD4 or TrWSD5 (Fig. 5). Similarly, the lack of in vivo DGAT activity in yeast was also found for a number of WS/DGAT proteins including Arabidopsis WSD1 [34], PhWS1 from petunia [35], and the majority of the 15 WS/DGAT homologs from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv [33]. These similar results suggest that expression of WS/DGAT in yeast could drive fatty acyl flux towards the production of WE rather than TAG. In contrast to these WS/DGAT proteins showing no in vivo DGAT activity, heterologous expression of the A. calcoaceticus WS/DGAT enzyme in the yeast quadruple mutant H1246 restored TAG biosynthesis [36], indicating that not all the members of the WS/DGAT family lack in vivo DGAT activity. Previous report shows that expression of Thraustochytrium aureum type 2 DGAT (TaDGAT2), which shares 100% amino acid sequence identity with one DGAT annotated in the T. roseum genome, restored TAG biosynthesis in the yeast mutant H1246 and displayed in vivo DGAT activity towards long-chain saturated and unsaturated acyl-CoAs and DAG substrates [29]. The presence of a TaDGAT2 homolog with 100% identity in T. roseum indicates that at least one DGAT protein other than TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 may be involved in TAG biosynthesis in T. roseum in a physiological context. It is not known whether TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 have in vivo DGAT activity in T. roseum and contribute to TAG biosynthesis so far.

Biochemical characterization of T. roseum WS/DGATs shows that both TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 display WS activity towards various acyl-CoAs of carbon chain length ranging from 8 to 20, which is consistent with the broad substrate profiles of the previously characterized WS/DGATs from bacteria and plants. For example, the jojoba WS has significant activity towards both saturated and monounsaturated acyl-CoAs ranging from 14 to 24 carbons in length [24]. WS/DGAT from Acinetobacter sp. Strain ADP1 also accepts different acyl-CoAs of various chain-lengths ranging from 2 to 20 with the highest activity towards palmitoyl-CoA [37]. Our in vivo characterization of TrWSD5 demonstrated the presence of certain amounts of ethyl palmitate in addition to major WE products in lipids extracted from recombinant yeast H1246 (Additional file 5: Figure S5). This result suggests that substrates utilized by T. roseum WS/DGATs are probably not limited to those acyl-CoAs tested in our in vitro assays but have a broader range. However, our in vitro assays demonstrate the difference of substrate preference between T. roseum WS/DGATs and the previously identified plant and bacterial WS/DGATs. Based on simple comparisons of kinetic features such as K m and k cat/K m (Tables 1, 2), lauroyl-CoA (C12:0) is the best substrate for TrWSD4, while decanoyl-CoA (C10:0) is the most preferred substrate for TrWSD5. The k cat/K m values of TrWSD4 for lauroyl-CoA are four orders of magnitude higher than that for polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs, and the k cat/K m values of TrWSD5 for decanoyl-CoA are two orders of magnitude higher than that for polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs. These observations suggest that medium and short chain acyl-CoAs may be the most preferred acyl-CoA substrates for WS activity of these two T. roseum WS/DGATs, which is in contrast to the preference of long-chain acyl-CoAs by plant and bacterial WS/DGATs. There are few examples that reported kinetic parameters of WS/DGATs for different acyl-CoAs with the exception of WS/DGAT from Acinetobacter sp. Strain ADP1. The WS reaction catalyzed by Acinetobacter sp. WS/DGAT with hexadecanol and different concentrations of palmitoyl-CoA as substrates was found to follow Michaelis–Menten kinetic [37]. The K m value for palmitoyl-CoA of 29 μM is comparable to the K m value (24.77 μM) of TrWSD5-catalyzed WS reaction for palmitoyl-CoA, while is ninefold higher than that of TrWSD4-catalyzed WS reaction (3.08 μM). In most literatures, substrate specificity of WS/DGATs towards acyl-CoAs was determined based on the comparison of WS activity for various-chain-length acyl-CoAs. Our results showed that although the values of V max for different acyl-CoAs were comparable, significant difference in the values of K m and k cat/K m for both TrWSD4- and TrWSD5-catalyzed WS reaction was observed among acyl-CoAs with different chain length and saturation (Tables 1, 2). Although our in vitro experiments may not reflect the true kinetic parameters of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 in the cellular environment, a direct comparison of these parameters can be made as these in vitro experiments were performed using the purified proteins at the same reaction conditions. Our results should reveal the real difference in substrate specificity of these two WS/DGAT enzymes functioning in vivo. TrWSD5 has a predicted membrane-spanning region at the C-terminus, suggesting that this WS/DGAT enzyme may be associated with the membrane. However, the conserved acyltransferase motif (HHXXXDG) which is important for catalytic activity of WS/DGAT is located at the hydrophilic N-terminus of TrWSD5 (Fig. 1b, c); thus, acyl-CoAs are still likely to be soluble physiological substrate for membrane-associated TrWSD5. The lack of a predicted membrane-spanning region in TrWSD4 indicates that it is not probably a transmembrane protein. When T. roseum was grown on the medium with glucose as carbon source, no detectable amounts of WEs were observed in total lipids (data not shown). Moreover, annotation of the T. roseum genome reveals the absence of a putative fatty acyl reductase which catalyzes the formation of fatty alcohol in WE biosynthesis. These information might indicate that fatty alcohol is unlikely the physiological substrate for these two WS/DGAT enzymes from T. roseum. Based on these analyses, we conclude that there is a difference in protein hydrophobility and enzymatic properties between TrWSD4 and TrWSD5.

We further summarized the biochemical properties of T. roseum WS/DGATs (TrWSD4 and TrWSD5) and other WS/DGATs characterized so far from prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Additional file 6: Table S1). The biochemical properties of WS/DGATs have been conventionally studied through in vitro enzyme assays which monitor the release of free CoA or the formation of radiolabeled products (WEs or TAGs). In these assays, either radiolabeled or non-radiolabeled acyl-CoAs are used as substrates in reactions catalyzed by purified enzyme, crude extracts of recombinant E. coli or yeast strains, or cellular fraction such as microsomes [22, 25, 30, 34]. As shown in Additional file 6: Table S1, WS/DGATs from different organisms vary in size, sequence and hydrophobility, and they have a very broad substrate range, accepting fatty acyl-CoAs with various degrees of saturation and carbon chain length as substrates [36–41]. Alcohol substrates utilized by WS/DGATs include linear fatty alcohols with various chain lengths, branched alcohols, cyclic and aromatic alcohols, and other alcohols with special structure. WS/DGATs also accept mono- and diacylglycerides as substrates. Moreover, some WS/DGATs show the highest activity towards specific acyl-CoA or alcohol. It should be noted that WS/DGAT may have different substrate specificities depending on the expression host and enzyme source used for measurement of enzyme activity and the specific combination of substrates [25].

In contrast to the absence of fatty acid ethyl ester in WE products extracted from recombinant S. cerevisiae expressing TrWSD4, functional expression of TrWSD5 in yeast led to the formation of a mixture of biodiesel (ethyl palmitate) and WEs. Shi et al. evaluated the potential of five WS enzymes from different source organisms to engineer S. cerevisiae to produce biodiesel [38], which suggests WS acyltransferase activity on acyl-CoA and ethanol. In our study, T. roseum WS/DGATs exhibited the predominant WS activity in recombinant yeast, leading to the accumulation of WEs as major products. T. roseum WS/DGATs with the highest preference for medium-chain acyl-CoAs would be used to produce WEs with shorter chain lengths via metabolic engineering. To tailor the composition of WEs in suitable hosts, co-expression of appropriate acyl-ACP thioesterases and FARs in combination with T. roseum WS/DGATs is likely required for producing high levels of novel WEs. For example, the selection of a 10:0-ACP thioesterase from Cuphea hookeriana to modulate the composition of fatty acids in the acyl-CoA pool is likely to redirect the synthesis of acyl-CoAs which is well matched with the preference of TrWSD5 WS activity towards decanoyl-CoA. Similarly, directing the flux of substrate acyl-CoAs towards TrWSD4 with the preference for lauroyl-CoA will require co-expression of a 12:0-ACP thioesterase from Umbellularia californica [16]. It is notable that blocking or minimizing TAG synthesis may also be required for future metabolic engineering efforts to accumulate high levels of WE products within the host cells.

Conclusions

We identified two bifunctional WS/DGATs from the marine protist T. roseum, which may represent the first report on WS/DGAT enzymes from the eukaryotic protist. In vitro assays using the purified recombinant enzymes from E. coli and in vivo characterization through functional expression in yeast have been performed to confirm their WS and DGAT activities and determine their substrate specificities. Similar to previously identified plant and bacterial WS/DGATs, T. roseum WS/DGATs are also unspecific enzymes accepting a broad range of various-chain-length acyl-CoAs and fatty alcohols as substrates. However, kinetic characterization shows their preference of medium-chain acyl-CoAs for WS activity. The use of T. roseum WS/DGATs in combination with different FARs has the potential to engineer suitable hosts such as oilseed crops to achiever a synthesis of novel WEs with tailored composition. Our work presents the biochemical properties of two WS/DGATs from the oleaginous protist and provides the basis for reconstruction of WE biosynthetic pathway in heterologous host, but further much more work is needed in order to investigate the potential of utilizing these T. roseum WS/DGATs to produce high levels of novel WEs through metabolic engineering approach.

Methods

Strains and growth conditions

The marine protist T. roseum ATCC28210 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). The culture of T. roseum was maintained on 3% agar slants containing the basal medium supplemented with 2% glucose (w/v) and 0.2% yeast extract (w/v). The basal medium contained (g/L): NaCl, 25; MgSO4·7H2O, 5; KCl, 1; KH2PO4, 0.1; CaCO3, 0.2; (NH4)2SO4, 0.2; NaHCO3, 0.1; monosodium glutamate, 2.0. T. roseum cells were grown in the medium at 25 °C with orbital shaking at 180 rpm.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae quadruple mutant H1246 MATα (dga1Δ lroΔ are1Δ are2Δ), gift from Antoni Banas, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk (Poland), was grown at 28 °C in YPD medium containing 1% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) peptone, and 2% (w/v) glucose. Its derivative strains for heterologous expression of the empty vector pESC-Ura, TrWSD4, or TrWSD5 were grown at 28 °C in synthetic complete medium lacking uracil and containing 0.67% (w/v) yeast nitrogen base with ammonium sulfate and 2% glucose.

Escherichia coli DH5α was used for cloning and cultured at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani broth with the 100 μg/mL ampicillin. E. coli Rosetta (DE3) was used as the expression host for the overproduction of recombinant TrWSD4 and TrWSD5. All strains used in this study are listed in Additional file 7: Table S2.

RNA isolation and reverse transcription PCR

Total RNA was isolated from the cultures of T. roseum using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Two micrograms of RNA was reverse transcribed and used for cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript™ Double Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara) as described by the manufacture. The PCR products were cloned into pMD19-T Simple vector for DNA sequencing.

Phylogenetic analysis

All protein sequences used for phylogenetic analysis were obtained from the public database at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The phylogenetic tree was constructed after protein sequence alignments using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method which was performed with MEGA 4.0 [42]. The molecular distance of the aligned sequences was calculated according to the poisson correction model. All gap and missing data in the alignments were accounted for by pairwise deletion. Branch points were tested for significance by bootstrapping with 1000 replications. The organisms and GenBank accession numbers for proteins used for phylogenetic analyses are shown on the corresponding phylogenetic trees.

Construction of plasmids for enzyme overproduction in E. coli

Sequence information from annotation of the T. roseum genome was used to design cDNA primers. After obtaining the full-length cDNA sequences, the open reading frames of TrWSD4 were amplified from total cDNAs of the protist T. roseum with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo) using the primer pair TrWSD4ec-for/TrWSD4ec-rev containing restriction sites (BamHI and XhoI) appropriate for cloning into pMD19-T Simple vector (Takara). The fidelity of PCR was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The resulting plasmid was digested with BamHI and XhoI, and the ORF of TrWSD4 was subcloned into the BamHI and XhoI sites of pET23b (Novagen), generating a C-terminal His6-tagged TrWSD4 construct.

To construct the plasmid for overproduction of TrWSD5 in E. coli, the coding sequence of TrWSD5 was codon optimized, synthesized by GenWiz (Shanghai, China) with the deletion of a predicted C-terminal transmembrane region (residues 472–494), and amplified by PCR using the primer pair TrWSD5ec-for/TrWSD5ec-rev containing restriction sites (BamHI and EcoRI) appropriate for cloning into pMD19-T Simple vector. The resulting plasmid was digested with BamHI and EcoRI and the codon-optimized ΔTmTrWSD5 (missing residues 472–494) was subcloned into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of the E. coli expression vector pMBP-C (BioVector, Beijing) to generate a C-terminal His6-tagged ΔTmTrWSD5 construct. The vectors pET23b carrying TrWSD4 and pMBP-C carrying ΔTmTrWSD5 were transformed into E. coli Rosetta (DE3) for recombinant enzyme overproduction. All the primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 7: Table S2.

Construction of plasmids for heterologous expression in yeast

Full-length TrWSD4 open reading frame was amplified by PCR using the primer pair TrWSD4sc-for/TrWSD4sc-rev containing restriction sites at the 5′ ends (EcoRI to the sense primer and SpeI to the antisense primer). The PCR product was cloned into the pMD19-T Simple vector and sequenced to confirm the fidelity of the construct. Full-length cDNA of TrWSD4 in pMD19-T Simple vector was digested with EcoRI and SpeI and cloned into the EcoRI and SpeI restriction sites of the pESC-URA expression vector (Agilent Technologies).

To construct the plasmid for heterologous expression of TrWSD5 in yeast, the coding sequence of TrWSD5 was codon optimized, synthesized by GenWiz (Shanghai, China) and amplified by PCR using the primer pair TrWSD5sc-for/TrWSD5sc-rev containing restriction sites at the 5′ ends (EcoRI to the sense primer and SpeI to the antisense primer). The PCR product was cloned into the pMD19-T Simple vector and sequenced to confirm the fidelity of the construct. The codon-optimized form of TrWSD5 cDNA in pMD19-T Simple vector was digested with EcoRI and SpeI and cloned into the EcoRI and SpeI restriction sites of the pESC-URA vector.

Enzyme overproduction in E. coli

For production of the TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 recombinant enzymes in E. coli Rosetta (DE3), starter cultures for the constructs of TrWSD4-pET23b and TrWSD5-pMBP-C were grown overnight at 37 °C in LB media containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Aliquots from these cultures were used to inoculate 200 mL cultures that were grown at 37 °C until mid-log phase has been reached. The cultures were induced to overexpress the recombinant WS/DGAT enzymes by the addition of 0.8 mM isopropylthio-β-galactoside (IPTG) and growth was continued for additional 6 h. The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and lysed by sonication on ice for 15 min. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. The clarified lysate was used to purify soluble TrWSD4–6 × His and TrWSD5–6 × His by a HisTrap FF column (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After that, recombinant proteins were transferred to a 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter unit (EMD Millipore) for concentration and buffer exchange into 50 mM sodium-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The purified proteins were supplemented with 5% (v/v) glycerol and stored at −20 °C.

Heterologous expression of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 in yeast

The TrWSD4-pESC-URA and TrWSD5-pESC-URA constructs were transformed into the yeast mutant H1246 using the PEG/lithium acetate method [43]. Yeast cells transformed with the empty pESC-URA plasmid were used as control. Yeast transformants were selected by growth on synthetic complete medium lacking uracil (SC-ura), supplemented with 2% (w/v) agar and 2% glucose. The positive colonies were transferred into liquid SC-ura media supplemented with 2% (w/v) glucose and grown at 28 °C overnight. The overnight cultures were diluted to OD600 = 0.4 in SC-ura medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) galactose and 1% (w/v) raffinose to induce protein expression. The cultures supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) palmitic acid together with 0.1% (w/v) hexadecanol were grown at 28 °C for 48 h and then harvested by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 5 min. The resulting pellets were washed three times with distilled water before being used for further lipid analysis.

Assay for WS/DGAT activity

Protein concentration of the purified TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (TIANGEN). WS/DGAT activity assays were performed using a previously described method [30]. WS activity was indirectly measured using the coupled reaction of the Ellman’s reagent [5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid), DTNB] and free CoA released during the reaction of esterification of fatty alcohol and fatty acyl-CoA. The reaction mixture (200 μL) consisted of 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 1 mg/mL DTNB (dissolved in DMSO), appropriate amount of purified recombinant enzymes (about 5 μg, unless otherwise specified), and the substrates of fatty alcohol and fatty acyl-CoA. Assay reactions were preincubated at 37 °C for 5 min before the reactions were initiated by the addition of the purified recombinant enzyme or acyl-CoA. The release of free CoA was monitored for additional 60 min at 412 nm (ε = 14,150 M−1 cm−1) on a microplate reader SpectraMax M2 (Molecular Devices). DGAT activity was determined in the same manner as described for the WS assay except that diacylglycerol (DAG, 100 μM) was used as the substrate instead of fatty alcohol. All assays were run at 37 °C, unless otherwise stated. To determine kinetic parameters for WS-catalyzed reaction, 5 μg TrWSD4 or TrWSD5 was used for each enzyme assay with specific acyl-CoA as substrate. The concentration of hexadecanol was constant at 100 μM and the concentrations of acyl-CoAs with different chain length and saturation were varied from 15 to 90 μM (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 μM). To test the effect of different temperatures on WS activity, spectrophotometric assays were conducted in 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 90 μM palmitoyl-CoA and 100 μM hexadecanol as the substrates at temperatures ranging from 7 to 57 °C (7, 17, 27, 37, 47, and 57 °C). To test the effect of salt concentration on WS activity, WS assays were carried out at 37 °C in the same reaction mixture containing the substrates of 90 μM decanoyl-CoA and 100 μM hexadecanol together with different concentrations of NaCl (400, 800, 1200, and 1600 mM). WS and DGAT activities of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 are from a representative experiment performed in triplicate.

Determination of kinetic parameters of WS-catalyzed reaction

To obtain the kinetic constants for TrWSD4- or TrWSD5-catalyzed esterification between acyl-CoA and fatty alcohol, the standard assay was performed at 37 °C in 200 μL microplates. Initial rates (V 0) were determined as the maximal slope of A412 against time curves using SoftMax Pro 5.3 software (Molecular Devices). The Michaelis–Menten parameters were determined by non-linear regression analysis or linear regression analysis for which the parameters were calculated according to the equation. Upon varying [S] to create saturation curves, values of V 0 were fitted to the Michaelis–Menten equation V 0 = V max[S]/([S] + K m) (where V max is the maximum velocity and K m is the Michaelis–Menten constant) using GraphPad Prism 7.0 to yield V max and K m. For certain substrates of acyl-CoAs on which substrate inhibition was observed, the Michaelis–Menten equation was modified to V 0 = V max[S]/{K m + [S](1 + [S]/K i)}, where K i is the inhibition constant. Values of K cat were calculated as V max/[E].

Measurement of acyl-CoA and fatty alcohol specificity

Acyl-CoA and fatty alcohol specificity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5 was determined by the same spectrophotometric assays as described for WS/DGAT activity assay. Acyl-CoA specificity was measured using hexadecanol as acyl acceptor, whereas alcohol specificity was determined with palmitoyl-CoA as acyl donor. In assays for acyl-CoA specificity of TrWSD4 and TrWSD5, different molecular species of acyl-CoAs were added to the above reaction mixture. Acyl-CoA substrates used in this study include: octanoyl-Coenzyme A, decanoyl-Coenzyme A and palmitoyl-Coenzyme A which were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and lauroyl Coenzyme A, myristoyl Coenzyme A, stearoyl Coenzyme A, (6Z,9Z,12Z-octadecatrienoyl) Coenzyme A, (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-arachidonoyl) Coenzyme A, and (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z-eicosapentaenoyl) Coenzyme A which were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabama, USA).

Lipid analysis by TLC and GC–MS

Yeast cells (50 mL) were harvested after 48 h of induction and washed twice with distilled water. Neutral lipids were extracted using the method described by Blight and Dyer [44]. Separation of TAG, WE, and polar lipids was performed by running silica gel 60 plates (Merck) in a developing solvent of hexane:diethylether:acetic acid (70:30:1[v/v/v]) and identified by co-migration with known standards of WE and TAG. Lipids on the TLC plate were visualized under UV light after spraying with primuline (Sigma). Spots corresponding to WEs were scraped off the TLC plates and resolved in chloroform. The wax composition was determined using gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (MS). GC (7890A; Agilent technologies) was equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a HP-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm having a film thickness of 0.25 μm, Agilent technologies). The flow rate of the carrier gas (He) was constant at 1 mL min−1. The temperature of injector and detector was 280 °C. The column temperature was controlled at 40 °C for 2 min, raised by 20 °C min−1 to 300 °C, and held for 15 min at 300 °C. MS analysis was carried out with an Agilent 5795C mass spectrometer and the parameters for MS analysis were as follows: the temperature of electron ionization (EI) ion source was 230 °C, electron energy was 70 eV, and temperature of quadruples was 150 °C. The wax sample was diluted in 10 μL chloroform and 1 μL was injected into the system. Identification of wax constitutes was made on the basis of their retention times in comparison with an internal library of spectra.

Abbreviations

DAG: 

diacylglycerol

DGAT: 

diacylglycerol acyltransferase

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulphoxide

DTNB: 

5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)

FID: 

flame ionization detector

GC: 

gas chromatography

k cat : 

enzyme turnover number

k cat/K m : 

enzyme specificity constant

K m : 

Michaelis–Menten constant

MS: 

mass spectrometry

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

RT: 

reverse transcription

SDS-PAGE: 

sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

TAG: 

triacylglycerol

TLC: 

thin layer chromatography

V 0 : 

reaction velocity rate

WE: 

wax ester

WS: 

wax synthase

YPD: 

yeast extract peptone

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

NZ and ZM conducted the experiments; NZ and LL prepared the figures and analyzed the data; XW and FH helped to analyze the data; YG conceived and designed the experiments and wrote the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Antoni Banas (University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland) for providing the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae quadruple mutant H1246.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. Strains constructed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Funding

The project was financially supported by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2013-OCRI).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, 430062, China
(2)
Hubei Key Laboratory of Lipid Chemistry and Nutrition, Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, 430062, China

References

  1. Alvarez HM, Pucci OH, Steinbüchel A. Lipid storage compounds in marine bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997;47:132–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez HM, Steinbüchel A. Triacylglycerols in prokaryotic microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;60:367–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel J, et al. Induction of a novel class of diacylglycerol acyltransferases and triacylglycerol accumulation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis as it goes into a dormancy-like state in culture. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:5017–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Olukoshi ER, Packter NM. Importance of stored triacylglycerols in Streptomyces: possible carbon source for antibiotics. Microbiology. 1994;140:931–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalscheuer R, Steinbüchel A. A novel bifunctional wax ester synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase mediates wax ester and triacylglycerol biosynthesis in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus ADP1. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(10):8075–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kalscheuer R, Stöveken T, Luftmann H, Malkus U, Reichelt R, Steinbüchel A. Neutral lipid biosynthesis in engineered Escherichia coli: jojoba oil-like wax esters and fatty acid butyl esters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(2):1373–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalscheuer R, et al. Analysis of storage lipid accumulation in Alcanivorax borkumensis: evidence for alternative triacylglycerols biosynthesis routes in bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:918–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ratledge C. Regulation of lipid accumulation in oleaginous micro-organisms. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002;30:1047–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kosa M, Ragauskas AJ. Lipids from heterotrophic microbes: advances in metabolism research. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29(2):53–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishige T, Tani A, Sakai Y, Kato N. Wax ester production by bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6:244–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jetter R, Kunst L. Plant surface lipid biosynthetic pathways and their utility for metabolic engineering of waxes and hydrocarbon biofuels. Plant J. 2008;54:670–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Iven T, Hornung E, Heilmann M, Feussner I. Synthesis of oleyl oleate wax esters in Arabidopsis thaliana and Camelina sativa seed oil. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14:252–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Aslan S, Hofvander P, Dutta P, Sun C, Sitbon F. Increased production of wax esters in transgenic tobacco plants by expression of a fatty acid reductase: wax synthase gene fusion. Transgenic Res. 2015;24:945–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Aslan S, et al. Wax esters of different compositions produced via engineering of leaf chloroplast metabolism in Nicotiana benthamiana. Metab Eng. 2014;25:103–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Miwa TK. Jojoba oil wax esters and derived fatty acids and alcohols: gas chromatographic analyses. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1971;48:259–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruiz-Lopez N, et al. Tailoring the composition of novel wax esters in the seeds of transgenic Camelina sativa through systematic metabolic engineering. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016. doi:10.1111/pbi.12679.Google Scholar
  17. Zhu LH, et al. Dedicated industrial oilseed crops as metabolic engineering platforms for sustainable industrial feedstock production. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Reiser S, Somerville C. Isolation of mutants of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus deficient in wax ester synthesis and complementation of one mutation with a gene encoding a fatty acyl coenzyme A reductase. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(9):2969–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollard MR, McKeon T, Gupta LM, Stumpf PK. Studies on biosynthesis of waxes by developing jojoba seed. II. The demonstration of wax biosynthesis by cell-free homogenates. Lipids. 1979;14:651–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Q, Siloto RMP, Lehner R, Stone SJ, Weselake RJ. Acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase: molecular biology, biochemistry and biotechnology. Prog Lipid Res. 2012;51:350–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Turchetto-Zolet AC, et al. Evolutionary view of acyl-CoA diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT), a key enzyme in neutral lipid biosynthesis. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:263.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Barney BM, Wahlen BD, Garner E, Wei J, Seefeldt LC. Differences in substrate specificities of five bacterial wax ester synthases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(16):5734–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Villa JA, Cabezas M, de la Cruz F, Moncalián G. Use of limited proteolysis and mutagenesis to identify folding domains and sequence motifs critical for wax ester synthase/acyl coenzyme A:diacylglycerol acyltransferase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(3):1132–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lardizabal KD, Metz JG, Sakamoto T, Hutton WC, Pollard MR, Lassner MW. Purification of a jojoba embryo wax synthase, cloning of its cDNA, and production of high levels of wax in seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000;122(3):645–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Miklaszewska M, Banas A. Biochemical characterization and substrate specificity of jojoba fatty acyl-CoA reductase and jojoba wax synthase. Plant Sci. 2016;249:84–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lanfranconi MP, Alvarez AF, Alvarez HM. Identification of genes coding for putative wax ester synthase/diacylglycerol acyltransferase enzymes in terrestrial and marine environments. AMB Express. 2015;5:42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Cavalier-Smith T, Allsopp MTEP, Chao EE. Thraustochytrids are chromists, not fungi: 18s rRNA signatures of heterokonta. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 1994;346:387–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Li ZY, Ward OP. Production of docosahexaenoic acid by Thraustochytrium roseum. J Ind Microbiol. 1994;13:238–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang C, et al. A thraustochytrid diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 with broad substrate specificity strongly increases oleic acid content in engineered Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(11):3189–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Holtzapple E, Schmidt-Dannert C. Biosynthesis of isoprenoid wax ester in Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus DSM 8798: identification and characterization of isoprenoid coenzyme A synthetase and wax ester synthases. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(10):3804–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandager L, et al. Storage lipid synthesis is non-essential in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(8):6478–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ogawa T, et al. Enhancement of photosynthetic capacity in Euglena gracilis by expression of cyanobacterial fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase leads to increases in biomass and wax ester production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wältermann M, Stöveken T, Steinbüchel A. Key enzymes for biosynthesis of neutral lipid storage compounds in prokaryotes: properties, function and occurrence of wax ester synthases/acyl-CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferases. Biochimie. 2007;89(2):230–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Li F, et al. Identification of the wax ester synthase/acyl-coenzyme A:diacylglycerol acyltransferase WSD1 required for stem wax ester biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008;148(1):97–107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. King A, Nam JW, Han J, Hilliard J, Jaworski JG. Cuticular wax biosynthesis in petunia petals: cloning and characterization of an alcohol-acyltransferase that synthesizes wax-esters. Planta. 2007;226(2):381–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalscheuer R, Luftmann H, Steinbüchel A. Synthesis of novel lipids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by heterologous expression of an unspecific bacterial acyltransferase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(12):7119–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Stöveken T, Kalscheuer R, Malkus U, Reichelt R, Steinbüchel A. The wax ester synthase/acyl coenzyme A:diacylglycerol acyltransferase from Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1: characterization of a novel type of acyltransferase. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(4):1369–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi S, Valle-Rodríguez JO, Khoomrung S, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Functional expression and characterization of five wax ester synthases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their utility for biodiesel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Röttig A, Steinbüchel A. Acyltransferases in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77(2):277–321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Hernández MA, Mohn WW, Martínez E, Rost E, Alvarez AF, Alvarez HM. Biosynthesis of storage compounds by Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 and global identification of genes involved in their metabolism. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:600.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Biester EM, Hellenbrand J, Frentzen M. Multifunctional acyltransferases from Tetrahymena thermophila. Lipids. 2012;47:371–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(8):1596–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Elble R. A simple and efficient procedure for transformation of yeasts. Biotechniques. 1992;13(1):18–20.Google Scholar
  44. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement

Biotechnology for Biofuels

ISSN: 1754-6834

Contact us