- Open Access
A novel acetyl xylan esterase enabling complete deacetylation of substituted xylans
© The Author(s) 2018
- Received: 27 December 2017
- Accepted: 9 March 2018
- Published: 22 March 2018
Acetylated 4-O-(methyl)glucuronoxylan (GX) is the main hemicellulose in deciduous hardwood, and comprises a β-(1→4)-linked xylopyranosyl (Xylp) backbone substituted by both acetyl groups and α-(1→2)-linked 4-O-methylglucopyranosyluronic acid (MeGlcpA). Whereas enzymes that target singly acetylated Xylp or doubly 2,3-O-acetyl-Xylp have been well characterized, those targeting (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp structures in glucuronoxylan have remained elusive.
An unclassified carbohydrate esterase (FjoAcXE) was identified as a protein of unknown function from a polysaccharide utilization locus (PUL) otherwise comprising carbohydrate-active enzyme families known to target xylan. FjoAcXE was shown to efficiently release acetyl groups from internal (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp structures, an activity that has been sought after but lacking in known carbohydrate esterases. FjoAcXE action boosted the activity of α-glucuronidases from families GH67 and GH115 by five and nine times, respectively. Moreover, FjoAcXE activity was not only restricted to GX, but also deacetylated (3-O-Araf)2-O-acetyl-Xylp of feruloylated xylooligomers, confirming the broad substrate range of this new carbohydrate esterase.
This study reports the discovery and characterization of the novel carbohydrate esterase, FjoAcXE. In addition to cleaving singly acetylated Xylp, and doubly 2,3-O-acetyl-Xylp, FjoAcXE efficiently cleaves internal 3-O-acetyl-Xylp linkages in (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp residues along with densely substituted and branched xylooligomers; activities that until now were missing from the arsenal of enzymes required for xylan conversion.
- Acetyl xylan esterase
- Glucuronic acid
- Polysaccharide utilization loci
- SGNH hydrolase
Enzymatic conversion of xylans to monosaccharides, oligosaccharides, or defined polymeric structures requires the concerted action of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes; http://www.cazy.org) from multiple CAZyme families . CAZymes that target side groups of GX and GAX include the following: α-l-arabinofuranosidases from glycoside hydrolase (GH) families GH3, GH43, GH51, GH54, and GH62, α-glucuronidases from the families GH67 and GH115, and acetyl xylan esterases (AcXEs) that have been primary reported in carbohydrate esterase (CE) families CE1, CE4–CE6, and CE16 [14–18]. Whereas α-glucuronidases from family GH115 target the α-(1→2)-linkage between MeGlcpA and mono-substituted Xylp at internal and end positions of GX, GH67 activity is restricted to such linkages at the non-reducing end of xylan and/or corresponding oligosaccharides . Similarly, CEs acting on GX have been grouped according to the positions they target (e.g., acting on O-2 and O-3 monoacetylated Xylp, versus targeting 2,3-di-O-acetylated Xylp) . Certain family CE16 enzymes also show activity towards non-reducing (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp positions [19–22]; however, in these cases, acetyl group migration from O-3 to O-4 on the non-reducing Xylp could not be ruled out [5, 19, 23]. Critically, to date, there are no known esterases that efficiently target internal (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp structures, nor α-glucuronidases that release MeGlcpA from acetylated Xylp, which hinders selective release of MeGlcpA substituents for material applications and full conversion of GX to fermentable monosaccharides [7, 19, 24]. Similarly, CEs capable of targeting acetyl groups adjacent to arabinosyl substituents and oligomeric structures in GAX remain to be uncovered.
Polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) comprise a physically linked set of bacterial genes that encode CAZymes and other proteins that work in concert to modify and degrade specific polysaccharides and/or oligosaccharides . Predicted PULs were introduced to the CAZyme database in 2015 (http://www.cazy.org/PULDB/) , and have emerged as especially rich regions within genome and metagenome sequences for enzyme discovery. For example, within the last year alone, novel activities towards pectin , xylan , galactomannan , chitin , and β-glucans  were discovered.
Herein, we mined PUL sequences with the specific aim to finally uncover carbohydrate esterases that efficiently target (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp positions internal to GX. Briefly, we identified PULs listed in the PULDB that encode CAZyme families known to target GX (i.e., GH10, GH115), and recombinantly expressed those sequences marked as having unknown function along with a predicted signal sequence for secretion. Ultimately, FjoAcXE encoded by Flavobacterium johnsoniae was selected and shown to cleave acetyl groups of internal and terminal (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp structures of GX, leading to synergistic impacts on measured activities for both family GH67 and GH115 α-glucuronidases. The discovery of FjoAcXE thus completes the arsenal of CAZymes required for GX conversion to defined structures or full hydrolysis to monosaccharides. Moreover, the deacetylation activity of FjoAcXE on xylooligomers from corn fiber confirmed its ability to target acetylated Xylp structures also substituted by an oligomeric side chain, demonstrating the relevance of this unclassified CE activity for the conversion of diverse, complex xylans.
para-Nitrophenol (pNP) alkyl esters were purchased from the following sources: p-nitrophenyl acetate (C2) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA; N8130), p-nitrophenyl butyrate (C4) (Sigma, N9876), p-nitrophenyl hexanoate (C6) (TCI-EP, Tokyo, Japan; H0484), p-nitrophenyl octanoate (C8) (Sigma, 21742), p-nitrophenyl decanoate (C10) (Sigma, N0252), p-nitrophenyl dodecanoate (C12) (Sigma, 61716), p-nitrophenyl myristate (C14) (Sigma, 70124), and p-nitrophenyl palmitate (C16) (Sigma, N2752). In addition, 4-methylumbelliferyl acetate (4-MUA) was purchased from Sigma (M0883) and 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) was purchased from Aldrich (M1381).
Acetylated monosaccharide substrates were purchased from the following sources: β-d-glucose pentaacetate (Aldrich, 285943), β-d-xylopyranose tetraacetate (Synthose Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada; TX534) and 1,2,3,4-tetra-O-acetyl-l-rhamnopyranose (Synthose Inc., TH212). Acetylated glucurono-xylooligosaccharides (Ac-XOS) were isolated by steam extraction of milled chips from Eucalyptus wood , or mixed hardwood kindly provided by Prof. Bradley Saville (University of Toronto, Canada) . Isolation and characterization of xylooligosaccharides from corn fibers were previously described .
The family GH115 α-glucuronidase from Amphibacillus xylanus (AxyAgu115) was purified as previously described . The family CE6 acetylxylan esterase from Orpinomyces sp. (E-AXEAO) was purchased from Megazyme (Bray, Ireland); the family GH67 α-glucuronidase from Cellvibrio japonicus (PRO-E0069; CjGlcA67A) was purchased from PROZOMIX Ltd (Haltwhistle, UK).
The PUL database (PULDB, http://www.cazy.org/PULDB)  was searched for PULs that contained at least two of the predicted xylan-active CAZyme families of interest, such as GH10, GH43, GH67, and GH115. From the obtained list of PULs, all proteins of unknown function were extracted and analyzed using Signal P4.1 ; those containing a predicted signal sequence for secretion were further analyzed based on the presence of Pfam domains, sequence length, and the type of CAZymes present on the corresponding PUL. Based on these criteria, FjoAcXE (PULDB ID: Fjoh_3879; GenBank ID: ABQ06890.1) was selected for recombinant protein expression. A structural model of FjoAcXE was built using PHYRE2.0  for the CBM-like domain, using PDB 2O14 as template, and Modeller 9.19  for the CE/catalytic domain using PDB 2O14 and PDB 1K7C . The model was displayed with PyMOLv18.104.22.168 Edu (PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Schrödinger, LLC).
Gene synthesis and molecular cloning
The gene encoding FjoAcXE lacking the predicted signal sequence (residues 1–21) was codon optimized for expression in Escherichia coli K12 using IDT Codon Optimization Tool (http://www.idtdna.com/CodonOpt). Fifteen base pair extensions homologous to the p15TV-L vector (GenBank ID: EF456736.1) (T7, 5′-TTGTATTTCCAGGGC and T7term, 5′-CAAGCTTCGTCATCA) were added to each end of the sequence and the gene was synthesized as gBlock® gene fragments (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA, USA). gBlock fragments were cloned into p15TV-L using the In-Fusion® HD EcoDry™ Cloning Kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The resulting plasmid was transformed into E. coli HST08 Stellar™ Competent Cells (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), and the sequence was verified using DNA sequencing service at the Center of Applied Genomics at the SickKids Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada).
Protein expression and purification
E. coli BL21(λDE3) codon plus strain harboring p15TV-L-FjoAcXE was propagated at 37 °C in 8 L of Luria–Bertani (LB) Broth–Miller (BioShop) supplemented with 33 µg/mL chloramphenicol and 100 µg/mL ampicillin until the OD600 reached 0.6–0.8. Cultures were cooled on ice for 5 min; additional 33 µg/mL chloramphenicol and 100 µg/mL ampicillin were added, and recombinant expression was induced overnight at 16 °C with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8967×g (Beckman Coulter, JLA-8.1000) for 15 min at 4 °C and the pellet (approx. 25 g fresh weight) was frozen at − 80 °C. The pellet was then suspended in binding buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol and 5 mM imidazole) and the cells were disrupted by sonication (100 amplitude, 5 s ON and 5 s OFF for 20 min). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 27,167×g (Beckman Coulter, JA-25.5 rotor) for 15 min at 4 °C and supernatant was filtered through Acrodisc® Syringe Filters with 0.45-µm Supor® membrane (Pall Corporation).
The sample was loaded onto 5-mL HisTrap HP (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with binding buffer. A combination of step-wise and gradient elutions using elution buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol and 300 mM imidazole) was performed on Biologic DuoFlow™ chromatography system (BioRad) where the column was washed with 4 column volumes (CV) of 100% binding buffer, and then increasingly substituted with elution buffer as follows: 5% elution buffer for 4 CV, 10% elution buffer for 6 CV and then gradient elution from 10 to 100% elution buffer over 12 CV. All steps were done at 1 mL/min, protein elution was monitored at A280 nm and 2 mL fractions were collected throughout the entire run. The resulting fractions were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE; selected fractions were pooled and then exchanged to 25 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) using 10 kDA Jumbosep™ centrifugal devices (Pall Corporation). The sample was then further purified using a 1.3-mL UNO™ Q ion exchange column (BioRad) pre-equilibrated with 25 mM HEPES pH 8.0 (Buffer A). Following a wash using 11.5 CV of Buffer A, a step-wise gradient elution was performed at 1 mL/min on a Biologic DuoFlow™ using 25 mM HEPES pH 8.0 with 1 M NaCl as elution buffer (Buffer B), where 0–50% of Buffer B was passed over 15.4 CV, and then up to 100% Buffer B over 6 CV. The samples were collected as 1-mL fractions throughout the entire run and purity was checked with 12% SDS-PAGE. The purified sample was exchanged to 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5 containing 300 mM NaCl before being flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C.
Protein concentration was measured using the Bradford assay with bovine serum albumin as a standard . The identity of purified FjoAcXE was then confirmed by peptide mass fingerprinting using an easy-nLC-1000 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a 10.5-cm PicoTip Emitter Silica Tip packed in-house with C18 media coupled online to a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific) .
Enzyme activity measurements using pNP aliphatic fatty acid esters and 4-MUA
200 mM stock solutions for pNP alkyl esters from C2 to C12 were prepared in 100% DMSO, whereas pNP substrates from C14 to C16 were prepared in 1:1 (v/v) of isopropanol:acetonitrile. Reactions were performed in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0) with 2 mM substrate and were initiated by adding 0.5 µg of FjoAcXE; the final reaction volume was 200 µL. Reactions were conducted at pH 7.0 to minimize non-enzymatic de-esterification of pNP substrates over the prolonged incubation (i.e., 2 h). Reactions continued for 2 h at 30 °C, and absorbance was measured continuously at 410 nm. Reaction mixtures without FjoAcXE were used as a blank.
Kinetic parameters of FjoAcXE were determined using pNP-acetate and 4-MUA. For pNP-acetate, reactions contained approximately 0.06 µg (1.32 × 10−6 µmol) of FjoAcXE in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) and were initiated by adding 0.05 mM to 10 mM pNP-acetate. The final reaction volume was 200 µL, and absorbance at 410 nm was read continuously for 40 min at 30 °C.
For 4-MUA, reactions contained approximately 0.02 µg (4.41×10−7 µmol) of FjoAcXE in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) and final of 10% DMSO. The enzyme dose was chosen to ensure a linear relationship between reaction time and product release ; reactions were then initiated by adding 0.01–1.5 mM of 4-MUA. The final reaction volume was 200 µL, and absorbance at 354 nm was read continuously for 40 min at 30 °C. Kinetic parameters were calculated using Michaelis–Menten equation and Graphpad Prism 5 software (La Jolla, CA, USA).
Optimum reaction conditions
The pH optimum of FjoAcXE was tested using 100 mM Tris, 50 mM MES, 50 mM acetic acid, and 50 mM sodium acetate trihydrate buffer with pH range of 3.5–9.5. Reactions containing 0.5 mM 4-MUA were initiated by adding 5 µg of FjoAcXE, and continued for 20 min at 30 °C; the final reaction volume was 200 µL. 4-MUA was selected to determine the pH optimum of FjoAcXE given the relative stability of this substrate under alkaline conditions . For all reactions using 4-MUA, absorbance was measured at 354 nm and the reaction mixture without FjoAcXE was used as a blank.
To measure pH stability, solutions containing 4 µg of FjoAcXE were incubated for 16 h at 4 °C in 100 mM Tris, 50 mM MES, 50 mM acetic acid, and 50 mM sodium acetate trihydrate buffer adjusted to pH 3.5–9.5; the final solution volume was 40 µL. After incubation, residual enzyme activity was tested in reactions containing 0.5 mM 4-MUAc in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0). Reactions were initiated by adding 1 µg of FjoAcXE from each treatment and continued for 20 min at 30 °C; the final reaction volume was 200 µL.
The temperature stability of FjoAcXE was tested by suspending 4 µg of FjoAcXE in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) and incubating each suspension (40 µL final volume) for up to 16 h at 20, 30, or 40 °C, or up to 60 min at 50, 60, or 70 °C. After the incubation, residual activity was tested in reactions containing 0.5 mM 4-MUAc in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0). Similar to pH stability, reactions were initiated by adding 1 µg of FjoAcXE from each treatment, and continued for 20 min at 30 °C; the final reaction volume was 200 µL.
Effect of divalent ions, detergents, and organic solvents
The metal-free apoenzyme of FjoAcXE was prepared as described in Wang et al. . Briefly, 0.05 g of CHELEX 100 (Sigma) was added to 1 mg of FjoAcXE and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The effect of metal ions was tested in reactions containing 0.5 mM 4-MUA in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0). Reactions were initiated by adding 5 µg of FjoAcXE, and continued for 20 min at 30 °C in the presence of 1 mM of the following metal ions: Ag2+, Ca2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+ (all as chloride salts, except for Ag2+, which was a nitrate). The final reaction volume was 200 µL, and control samples included CHELEX treated and untreated FjoAcXE with and without 20 mM EDTA. Absorbance was measured at 354 nm and the reaction mixture without FjoAcXE was used as a blank.
The chemical stability of FjoAcXE was tested in reactions containing 0.5 mM 4-MUAc in 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0). Reactions were initiated by adding 0.5 µg of FjoAcXE, and continued for 20 min at 30 °C in the presence of 30% (v/v) ethanol, 30% (v/v) isopropanol, 1% (w/v) SDS, 1% (w/v) dithiothreitol (DTT), 1% (v/v) Tween-20, 1% (v/v) Tween-80, and 1% (v/v) TritonX-100; the final reaction volume was 200 µL.
Activity on acetylated monosaccharides
Reactions comprised 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) and 0.1% (w/v) of β-d-glucose pentaacetate (final concentration 2.5 mM), β-d-xylopyranose tetraacetate (final concentration 3.14 mM), or 1,2,3,4-tetra-O-acetyl-l-rhamnopyranose (final concentration 3 mM). Reactions were initiated by adding 0.5 µg of FjoAcXE; the final reaction volume was 30 µL. Reactions continued for 20 min at 30 °C, and were stopped by boiling for 10 min. The samples were quickly centrifuged and release of acetic acid was then measured in the supernatant using the Acetic Acid kit (K-ACETRM, Megazyme). Reaction mixtures without FjoAcXE were used as a blank for each substrate.
1H-NMR analysis of FjoAcXE activity on acetylated (glucurono)-xylooligosaccharides
1H-NMR was performed to monitor the activity of FjoAcXE and AxyAgu115A on Ac-XOS substrates. Reactions comprised 1% (w/v) acetylated (glucurono)-xylooligosaccharides in 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.0) and 10 µg of each protein; the final reaction volume was 400 µL. The reaction continued for 20 h at 30 °C and gentle shaking. Reaction mixtures without enzyme were used as negative controls. Following the incubation, samples were filtered through Acrodisc® syringe filters with 0.2-µm Supor® membrane (Pall Corporation), and lyophilized. The samples were then dissolved in 300 µL D2O and transferred into 3-mm NMR tubes (Norell) for analysis using an Agilent DD2 700 MHz spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance HCN cold probe with a scan number of 64, relaxation delay of 1 s and acquisition time of 4.5 s. The data were obtained using VnmrJ 4.0 (Agilent) and analyzed with MestReNova 10.0 (Mestrelab Research). The HDO peak at 4.790 was used as internal standard. The change in signal intensity in the regions between 5.4 and 4.4 ppm corresponding to acetylated Xylp residues in the anomeric region of the spectrum, and 2.30–2.05 ppm region corresponding to the acetyl group methyl protons were used to assign proton chemical shifts, as reported in Uhliariková et al. .
Impact of FjoAcXE on α-glucuronidase activity towards (glucurono)-xylooligosaccharides
FjoAcXE, CjGlcA67A, AxyAgu115A, and E-AXEAO were tested alone and as pairs of carbohydrate esterase and α-glucuronidase activities. Reactions comprised 1% (w/v) Ac-XOS in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), which is within one pH unit from the optimum pH of each enzyme. Reactions were initiated by adding 0.5 µg of each enzyme; the final reaction volume was 30 µL. Reactions continued for 20 min at 30 °C and were stopped by boiling for 10 min. The samples were quickly centrifuged and release of acetic acid and d-glucuronic acid were measured using Acetic Acid (K-ACETRM, Megazyme) and d-glucuronic acid/d-galacturonic acid (K-URONIC, Megazyme) assay kits, respectively. Reaction mixtures without enzymes were used as blanks.
Matrix assisted laser desorption time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) analysis of FjoAcXE activity on feruloylated xylooligosaccharides
Reactions comprised 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 1% (w/v) of feruloylated xylooligomers from corn fiber, and were initiated by adding 1 µg of FjoAcXE; the final reaction volume was 50 µL. Reactions continued for 20 min at 30 °C with gentle shaking, and were stopped by boiling the samples at 100 °C for 10 min. Reaction mixtures without enzyme were used as negative controls. One microliter of each reaction sample (after desalting with AG 1-X8 anion exchange resin; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was then mixed with 2 µL matrix solution [2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 10 mg/mL H2O/ACN (3:7)] on a stainless-steel metal plate and allowed to dry under a constant stream of air. MALDI-TOF was performed using an Ultra-flex3 instrument (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a nitrogen laser of 337 nm and operated in the positive mode. The system was controlled by FlexAnalysis software. Calibration was performed with a mixture of maltodextrins 480–3000 Da (Elicityl, Crolles, France). After a delayed extraction time of 130 ns, positive ions were accelerated with 22 kV voltage and detected using reflector mode.
Candidate selection and recombinant protein production
General properties of FjoAcXE
Recombinant FjoAcXE was functionally expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His6-tag and purified to homogeneity with approximate yield of 6 mg/g of fresh cell pellet. The predicted molecular mass of recombinant FjoAcXE is 45.2 kDa, which was consistent with that estimated by SDS-PAGE (Additional file 3: Fig. S3). Whereas no or negligible activity was measured on tested polysaccharides and pNP-glycosides (Additional file 4: Fig. S4, Additional file 5: Fig. S5, respectively), clear activity was observed on pNP-acetate followed by pNP-butyrate (Additional file 6: Fig. S6); notably, lack of activity on longer chain alkyl esters is consistent with esterase rather than lipase activity .
Kinetic parameters of FjoAcXE on 4-MUA and pNP-acetate
Specific activity (µmol/min/mg)
kcat/Km (s−1 mM−1)
126.3 ± 5.9
95.1 ± 4.4
0.8 ± 0.1
160.7 ± 4.0
120.8 ± 3.0
0.9 ± 0.1
Activity of FjoAcXE on acetylated mono- and oligosaccharides
MALDI-TOF analysis of FjoAcXE towards xylooligomers from corn fiber
An unclassified protein from a polysaccharide utilization locus predicted to promote xylan deconstruction was biochemically characterized and shown to harbor novel carbohydrate esterase activity, which was missing from the arsenal of enzymes required for GX conversion. In addition to promoting α-glucuronidase activity through release of acetyl groups from internal (2-O-MeGlcpA)3-O-acetyl-Xylp structures, FjoAcXE also targeted (3-O-Araf)2-O-acetyl-Xylp of feruloylated xylooligomers. The novel ability of FjoAcXE to release acetyl groups of Xylp backbone residues that are further substituted by either MeGlcpA or a neutral oligomeric side chain could be explained by the loop regions predicted to surround the catalytic site of the enzyme and to play a role in substrate preference. On-going efforts to solve the FjoAcXE structure, and to characterize predicted homologs of FjoAcXE, will help confirm these predictions and likely uncover additional protein features that determine the broad substrate range of this new carbohydrate esterase activity.
FMR selected, recombinantly expressed, purified, and characterized FjoAcXE, and wrote the manuscript. EJ analyzed FjoAcXE activity on feruloylated xylo-oligosaccharides by MALDI-TOF/TOF and contributed to data interpretation. PS developed and interpreted the FjoAcXE model structure. MT and MAK provided characterized acetylated glucurono-xylooligosaccharides and feruloylated xylo-oligosaccharides, respectively, and assisted with NMR and mass spectrometry analyses. RY and WW contributed to the basic characterization of FjoAcXE characterization, provision of AxyAgu115A, and 1H NMR analyses. ERM conceived and coordinated the study. All authors contributed to the revision of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We thank Professor B. Saville (University of Toronto) for preparing hot water extracted glucuronoxylan from mixed hardwood, which was used to advance the characterization of FjoAcXE.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its additional files].
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for the Strategic Network Grant “Industrial Biocatalysis Network,” the European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator Grant to ERM (BHIVE—648925), and an NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship Masters Award and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship to FMR.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Mishra A, Malhotra AV. Tamarind xyloglucan: a polysaccharide with versatile application potential. J Mater Chem. 2009;19:8528.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hansen NML, Plackett D. Sustainable films and coatings from hemicelluloses: a review. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:1493–505.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ebringerová A. Structural diversity and application potential of hemicelluloses. Macromol Symp. 2006;232:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teleman A, Tenkanen M, Jacobs A, Dahlman O. Characterization of O-acetyl-(4-O-methylglucurono)xylan isolated from birch and beech. Carbohydr Res. 2002;337:373–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kabel MA, De Waard P, Schols HA, Voragen AGJ. Location of O-acetyl substituents in xylo-oligosaccharides obtained from hydrothermally treated Eucalyptus wood. Carbohydr Res. 2003;338:69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teleman A, Lundqvist J, Tjerneld F, Stalbrand H, Dahlman O. Characterization of acetylated 4-O-methylglucuronoxylan isolated from aspen employing 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res. 2000;329:807–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biely P, Singh S, Puchart V. Towards enzymatic breakdown of complex plant xylan structures: state of the art. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:1260–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Appeldoorn MM, De Waard P, Kabel MA, Gruppen H, Schols HA. Enzyme resistant feruloylated xylooligomer analogues from thermochemically treated corn fiber contain large side chains, ethyl glycosides and novel sites of acetylation. Carbohydr Res. 2013;381:33–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gírio FM, Fonseca C, Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Marques S, Bogel-Łukasik R. Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4775–800.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ebringerova A, Hromadkova Z, Heinze T. Hemicellulose. Adv Polym Sci. 2005;186:1–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Appeldoorn MM, Kabel MA, Van Eylen D, Gruppen H, Schols HA. Characterization of oligomeric xylan structures from corn fiber resistant to pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:11294–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Littunen K, Mai-Gisondi G, Seppälä J, Master ER. Enzymatically debranched xylans in graft copolymerization. Biomacromol. 2017;18:1634–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:490–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura AM, Nascimento AS, Polikarpov I. Structural diversity of carbohydrate esterases. Biotechnol Res Innov. 2017;1:35–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alalouf O, Balazs Y, Volkinshtein M, Grimpel Y, Shoham G, Shoham Y. A new family of carbohydrate esterases is represented by a GDSL hydrolase/acetylxylan esterase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:41993–2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biely P, Puls J, Schneider H. Acetyl xylan esterases in fungal cellulolytic systems. FEBS Lett. 1985;186:80–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biely P. Microbial carbohydrate esterases deacetylating plant polysaccharides. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:1575–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adesioye FA, Makhalanyane TP, Biely P, Cowan DA. Phylogeny, classification and metagenomic bioprospecting of microbial acetyl xylan esterases. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2016;93:79–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neumüller KG, de Souza AC, van Rijn JH, Streekstra H, Gruppen H, Schols HA. Positional preferences of acetyl esterases from different CE families towards acetylated 4-O-methyl glucuronic acid-substituted xylo-oligosaccharides. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Puchart V, Berrin JG, Haon M, Biely P. A unique CE16 acetyl esterase from Podospora anserina active on polymeric xylan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:10515–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Puchart V, Agger JW, Berrin JG, Várnai A, Westereng B, Biely P. Comparison of fungal carbohydrate esterases of family CE16 on artificial and natural substrates. J Biotechnol. 2016;233:228–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mai-Gisondi G, Maaheimo H, Chong SL, Hinz S, Tenkanen M, Master E. Functional comparison of versatile carbohydrate esterases from families CE1, CE6 and CE16 on acetyl-4-O-methylglucuronoxylan and acetyl-galactoglucomannan. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2017;1861:2398–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Puchart V, Biely P. Redistribution of acetyl groups on the non-reducing end xylopyranosyl residues and their removal by xylan deacetylases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;99:3865–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uhliariková I, Vršanská M, McCleary BV, Biely P. Positional specifity of acetylxylan esterases on natural polysaccharide: an NMR study. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2013;1830:3365–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grondin JM, Tamura K, Déjean G, Abbott DW, Brumer H. Polysaccharide utilization loci: fuelling microbial communities. J Bacteriol. 2017;199:e00860–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Terrapon N, Lombard V, Gilbert HJ, Henrissat B. Automatic prediction of polysaccharide utilization loci in Bacteroidetes species. Bioinformatics. 2014;31:647–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ndeh D, Rogowski A, Cartmell A, Luis AS, Baslé A, Gray J, et al. Complex pectin metabolism by gut bacteria reveals novel catalytic functions. Nature. 2017;544:65–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang K, Pereira GV, Cavalcante JJV, Zhang M, Mackie R, Cann I. Bacteroides intestinalis DSM 17393, a member of the human colonic microbiome, upregulates multiple endoxylanases during growth on xylan. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bagenholm V, Reddy SK, Bouraoui H, Morrill J, Kulcinskaja E, Bahr CM, et al. Galactomannan catabolism conferred by a polysaccharide utilization locus of Bacteroides ovatus: enzyme synergy and crystal structure of a β-mannanase. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:229–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larsbrink J, Zhu Y, Kharade SS, Kwiatkowski KJ, Eijsink VGH, Koropatkin NM, et al. A polysaccharide utilization locus from Flavobacterium johnsoniae enables conversion of recalcitrant chitin. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temple MJ, Cuskin F, Baslé A, Hickey N, Speciale G, Williams SJ, et al. A Bacteroidetes locus dedicated to fungal 1,6-β-glucan degradation: unique substrate conformation drives specificity of the key endo-1,6-β-glucanase. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:10639–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gullón P, González-Muñoz MJ, Domínguez H, Parajó JC. Membrane processing of liquors from Eucalyptus globulus autohydrolysis. J Food Eng. 2008;87:257–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan R. Characterization of novel GH115 alpha-glucuronidases for enzymatic tailoring of xylans. Toronto: Univeristy of Toronto; 2017.Google Scholar
- Yan R, Vuong TV, Wang W, Master ER. Action of a GH115 α-glucuronidase from Amphibacillus xylanus at alkaline condition promotes release of 4-O-methylglucopyranosyluronic acid from glucuronoxylan and arabinoglucuronoxylan. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2017;104:22–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelly LA, Mezulis S, Yates C, Wass M, Sternberg M. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modelling, prediction, and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Webb B, Sali A. Protein structure prediction. Curr Protoc Bioinform. 2014;1137:1–15.Google Scholar
- Mølgaard A, Larsen S. A branched N-linked glycan at atomic resolution in the 1.12 Å structure of rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase. Acta Crystallogr Sect Biol Crystallogr. 2002;58:111–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2856–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mai-Gisondi G, Master ER. Colorimetric detection of acetyl xylan esterase activities. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1588:45–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, Mazurkewich S, Kimber MS, Seah SYK. Structural and kinetic characterization of 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2- oxoglutarate/4-carboxy-4-hydroxy-2-oxoadipate aldolase, a protocatechuate degradation enzyme evolutionarily convergent with the HpaI and DmpG pyruvate aldolases. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:36608–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Montanier C, Money VA, Pires VMR, Flint JE, Pinheiro BA, Goyal A, et al. The active site of a carbohydrate esterase displays divergent catalytic and noncatalytic binding functions. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:0684–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ašler IL, Ivić N, Kovačić F, Schell S, Knorr J, Krauss U, et al. Probing enzyme promiscuity of SGNH hydrolases. ChemBioChem. 2010;11:2158–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu AMF, Somers NA, Kazlauskas RJ, Brush TS, Zocher F, Enzelberger MM, et al. Mapping the substrate selectivity of new hydrolases using colorimetric screening: lipases from Bacillus thermocatenulatus and Ophiostoma piliferum, esterases from Pseudomonas fluorescens and Streptomyces diastatochromogenes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 2001;12:545–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bakshy K, Gummadi SN, Manoj N. Biochemical characterization of Alr1529, a novel SGNH hydrolase variant from Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteomics. 2009;1794:324–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang H, Kim S, Yoon S, Ryu Y, Lee SY, Kim TD. Characterization of a novel oligomeric SGNH-arylesterase from Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021. Int J Biol Macromol. 2010;46:145–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim S, Bae SY, Kim SJ, Ngo TD, Kim KK, Kim TD. Characterization, amyloid formation, and immobilization of a novel SGNH hydrolase from Listeria innocua 11262. Int J Biol Macromol. 2012;50:103–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bae SY, Ryu BH, Jang E, Kim S, Kim TD. Characterization and immobilization of a novel SGNH hydrolase (Est24) from Sinorhizobium meliloti. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:1637–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu T, Ding J, Zheng Q, Han N, Yu J, Yang Y, et al. Identification and characterization of a new alkaline SGNH hydrolase from a thermophilic bacterium Bacillus sp. K91. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26:730–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Panda T, Gowrishankar BS. Production and applications of esterases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;67:160–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mølgaard A, Kauppinen S, Larsen S. Rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase elucidates the structure and function of a new family of hydrolases. Structure. 2000;8:373–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lo Y-C, Lin S-C, Shaw J-F, Liaw Y-C. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli thioesterase I/protease I/lysophospholipase L1: consensus sequence blocks constitute the catalytic center of SGNH-hydrolases through a conserved hydrogen bond network. J Mol Biol. 2003;330:539–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee YL, Chen JC, Shaw JF. The thioesterase I of Escherichia coli has arylesterase activity and shows stereospecificity for protease substrates. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;231:452–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim K, Ryu BH, Kim SS, An DR, Ngo TD, Pandian R, et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of a carbohydrate acetylesterase from Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:117–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Till M, Goldstone DC, Attwood GT, Moon CD, Kelly WJ, Arcus VL. Structure and function of an acetyl xylan esterase (Est2A) from the rumen bacterium Butyrivibrio proteoclasticus. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform. 2013;81:911–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lever M. A new reaction for calorimetric determination of carbohydrates. Anal Biochem. 1972;47:273–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar