Open Access

Metabolic engineering strategies for optimizing acetate reduction, ethanol yield and osmotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Biotechnology for Biofuels201710:107

Received: 21 February 2017

Accepted: 14 April 2017

Published: 26 April 2017



Glycerol, whose formation contributes to cellular redox balancing and osmoregulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is an important by-product of yeast-based bioethanol production. Replacing the glycerol pathway by an engineered pathway for NAD+-dependent acetate reduction has been shown to improve ethanol yields and contribute to detoxification of acetate-containing media. However, the osmosensitivity of glycerol non-producing strains limits their applicability in high-osmolarity industrial processes. This study explores engineering strategies for minimizing glycerol production by acetate-reducing strains, while retaining osmotolerance.


GPD2 encodes one of two S. cerevisiae isoenzymes of NAD+-dependent glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH). Its deletion in an acetate-reducing strain yielded a fourfold lower glycerol production in anaerobic, low-osmolarity cultures but hardly affected glycerol production at high osmolarity. Replacement of both native G3PDHs by an archaeal NADP+-preferring enzyme, combined with deletion of ALD6, yielded an acetate-reducing strain the phenotype of which resembled that of a glycerol-negative gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strain in low-osmolarity cultures. This strain grew anaerobically at high osmolarity (1 mol L−1 glucose), while consuming acetate and producing virtually no extracellular glycerol. Its ethanol yield in high-osmolarity cultures was 13% higher than that of an acetate-reducing strain expressing the native glycerol pathway.


Deletion of GPD2 provides an attractive strategy for improving product yields of acetate-reducing S. cerevisiae strains in low, but not in high-osmolarity media. Replacement of the native yeast G3PDHs by a heterologous NADP+-preferring enzyme, combined with deletion of ALD6, virtually eliminated glycerol production in high-osmolarity cultures while enabling efficient reduction of acetate to ethanol. After further optimization of growth kinetics, this strategy for uncoupling the roles of glycerol formation in redox homeostasis and osmotolerance can be applicable for improving performance of industrial strains in high-gravity acetate-containing processes.


Yeast NADH NADPH Redox engineering Acetic acid Osmotic stress Bioethanol


By functionally replacing fossil-fuel-derived compounds, microbial production of chemicals and transport fuels can contribute to a transition to a sustainable, low-carbon global economy [1]. The total industrial production of fuel ethanol, which reached ca. 100 billion litres in 2015, is predicted to increase further [2]. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the established microbial cell factory for conversion of starch- and sucrose-derived hexose sugars to ethanol, as it combines a high ethanol yield and productivity with robustness under process conditions [35]. Efforts in yeast strain improvement and process optimization of corn–starch and cane–sugar-based bioethanol productions have further improved product yields and productivity [5]. Furthermore, intensive metabolic and evolutionary engineering studies have yielded yeast strains capable of efficiently fermenting the pentose sugars xylose and arabinose, thus paving the way for yeast-based ‘second-generation’ bioethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates [68].

In industrial bioethanol production, the carbohydrate feedstock represents the single largest cost factor [9]. Maximizing ethanol yield on sugar is therefore a key requirement, especially in second-generation processes, ethanol yields and productivity of which are generally still lower than those of first-generation processes [68]. Adequate yeast performance in lignocellulosic hydrolysates also requires tolerance to inhibitors that are released during biomass pre-treatment and hydrolysis [1012]. Suboptimal ethanol yields in industrial processes are caused by formation of biomass and low-molecular-weight metabolites, of which glycerol accounts for a loss of up to 4% of the carbohydrate substrate [13]. Under anaerobic conditions, wild-type S. cerevisiae strains require glycerol formation to re-oxidize NADH formed during biosynthesis or during production of metabolites whose formation results in net NADH formation [14, 15]. As the major compatible solute in S. cerevisiae, glycerol also plays a key role in osmotolerance [16, 17].

In S. cerevisiae, glycerol formation is initiated by reduction of the glycolytic intermediate dihydroxyacetone phosphate to glycerol-3-phosphate, a reaction catalysed by two isoenzymes of NAD+-dependent glycerol-3P dehydrogenase (G3PDH), Gpd1 and Gpd2 [18]. Glycerol-3P is subsequently hydrolysed to glycerol and inorganic phosphate by glycerol-3P phosphatase, isoenzymes of which are encoded by GPP1 and GPP2. Reoxidation of 1 mol of NADH through glycerol production requires 0.5 mol glucose and 1 mol ATP [18]. Several metabolic engineering strategies have demonstrated that altering redox-cofactor specificity of reactions in biosynthesis [13] or in sugar dissimilation [19] can be used to decrease glycerol formation from sugars.

GPD1 and GPD2 are differentially regulated, as transcriptional upregulation of GPD1 mainly occurs in response to osmotic stress, while regulation of GPD2 is linked to redox homeostasis [2022]. Complete elimination of glycerol production by inactivation of both GPD1 and GPD2 has been reported to abolish anaerobic growth and to greatly increase osmosensitivity [20, 21, 23]. Anaerobic growth of gpd1Δ gpd2Δ cultures can be restored by addition of an external electron acceptor, such as acetoin, to growth media [23]. Recently, S. cerevisiae strains have been engineered to use acetic acid or CO2 as external electron acceptors [2428]. Functional expression of a heterologous acetylating-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (A-ALD), together with the activities of the native acetyl-CoA synthetases and alcohol dehydrogenases, enabled the NADH-dependent reduction of acetic acid to ethanol [25]. CO2 is abundantly present in all industrial ethanol fermentation processes, while acetic acid is an important, ubiquitous inhibitor of yeast performance in lignocellulosic hydrolysates [10, 11]. Use of acetic acid as an external ‘redox sink’ is highly attractive for second-generation bioethanol processes, since its reduction to ethanol not only increases product yields, but simultaneously contributes to detoxification of the fermentation medium [25, 29, 30].

Although metabolic engineering has enabled the replacement of glycerol production by the reduction of acetic acid to ethanol, the increased osmosensitivity of gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strains has not been fully resolved. Process intensification of bioethanol production via the introduction of high-gravity fermentation processes will make osmotolerance ever more important [3136]. Previous research on improving osmotolerance of gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strains explored production of alternative compatible solutes, including the polyols mannitol and sorbitol [37], trehalose [3840] and proline [41, 42]. These alternative compounds, however, did not confer the same osmotolerance as glycerol. Evolutionary engineering of an acetate-reducing gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strain yielded a strain that could grow anaerobically at 1 mol L−1 glucose without loss of acetate-reduction potential or ethanol yield [43]. However, the underlying genetic changes were not fully resolved [43]. Tuning the expression of the native G3PDH genes can lead to decreased glycerol production, but the resulting strains still require the production of considerable amounts of this by-product to maintain the redox-cofactor balance [34, 35, 44]. To uncouple the roles of glycerol formation in NADH reoxidation and osmotolerance in S. cerevisiae, it would be of interest to alter the redox-cofactor specificity of G3PDH. Specifically, making this reaction NADPH-dependent might uncouple glycerol production from NAD+ regeneration. In such a scenario, NAD+ could then be exclusively regenerated via acetate or CO2 reduction. Simultaneously, NADPH-dependent formation of intracellular glycerol would enable the synthesis of a compatible solute with minimal losses in ethanol yield. Recently, an NADP+-preferring G3PDH, encoded by the gpsA gene from the thermophilic archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus was described [45]. Based on its unusual cofactor preference and, due to its thermophilic origin, anticipated low in vivo activity in yeast, we hypothesized that A. fulgidus GpsA might be an interesting candidate to replace the NAD+-dependent Gpd1 and Gpd2 enzymes in S. cerevisiae.

The goal of this study is to explore new metabolic engineering strategies for construction of acetate-reducing, osmotolerant S. cerevisiae strains with a minimal, non-zero production of glycerol. To this end, acetate-reducing strains with different configurations of the native glycerol production pathway, as well as strains in which GPD1 and GPD2 were replaced by A. fulgidus gpsA, were constructed. To construct acetate-reducing strains, the ethanolamine utilization protein of E. coli, encoded by eutE [Genbank: WP_001075673.1], was overexpressed, as it was previously shown to support near-wild-type anaerobic growth rates in a gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strain background [29]. The impacts of these engineering strategies on acetate reduction and glycerol production were quantitatively analysed in anaerobic bioreactor batch cultures grown on low- and high-osmolarity media.


Strain propagation and maintenance

All S. cerevisiae strains used in this study belong to the CEN.PK lineage [46] (Table 1). S. cerevisiae cultures were propagated in synthetic medium [47] containing 20 g L−1 glucose. E. coli DH5a cultures for plasmid cloning were propagated in LB medium (10 g L−1 Bacto tryptone, 5 g L−1 Bacto yeast extract, 5 g L−1 NaCl) containing 100 mg L−1 ampicillin. All strains were stored at −80 °C, after addition of sterile glycerol (30% v v−1) to growing cultures.
Table 1

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used in this study

Strain name

Relevant genotype



MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2



ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2



ura3 leu2::LEU2 [pRS405] gpd1::loxP gpd2::hphMX4 pUDE43



ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 p426-TEF (empty)

This work


ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd2::eutE pROS10 (GPD2-targeting)

This work


ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 sga1::eutE pUDR119

This work


ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE pUDR240

This work


ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE ald6Δ pUDR240

This work


MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE



MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE ald6Δ

This work


ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE ald6Δ

This work


MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE ald6Δ sga1::ALD6

This work


ura3-52 MAL2-8c SUC2 can1::cas9-natNT2 gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE ald6Δ sga1::ALD6 pUDR103

This work

Construction of expression cassettes and plasmids

Plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2. Plasmids-expressing chimeric gRNAs were used for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing [48]. Unique Cas9-recognition sequences in GPD1, GPD2, SGA1 and ALD6 were selected as described previously [29]. PCR for construction of expression cassettes and diagnostic PCR were performed using Phusion Hot Start II High Fidelity DNA Polymerase and Dreamtaq polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. For the construction of pUDR240, the backbone of the plasmid was PCR amplified using the double-binding primer 5793 (Additional file 1) and pROS10 as template. The insert fragment, expressing the GPD1-targeting and GPD2-targeting gRNA cassettes, was amplified using primers 6965–6966 and pROS10 as template. For the construction of pUDR103, the plasmid backbone of pMEL10 was PCR amplified using primers 5792–5980. The SGA1-targeting gRNA expression cassette was PCR amplified using primers 5979–7023 and pMEL10 as template. For the construction of pUDR264, the plasmid backbone of pMEL11 was PCR amplified using primers 5792–5980. The ALD6-targeting gRNA expression cassette was PCR amplified using primers 5979–7610 and pMEL11 as a template. Plasmids were assembled with the Gibson Assembly Cloning kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), after downscaling the supplier’s protocol to 10 μL reaction volumes. Plasmids pUDR240 and pUDR264 were cloned in E. coli DH5a cells after transformation by electroporation and plasmid re-isolation with a miniprep kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Correct clones were verified by restriction digestion or by diagnostic PCR (DreamTaq polymerase, Additional file 1). For the single deletion of GPD2, a plasmid backbone was PCR amplified with the double-binding primer 5793 and pROS10 as template. The insert fragment, expressing two identical GPD2-targeting gRNA cassettes, was amplified using primer 6966 and pROS10 as templates. For the single deletion of GPD2, the two plasmid fragments were transformed directly into yeast cells and assembled in vivo.
Table 2

Plasmids used in this study




p426-TEF (empty)

2 μ, URA3, TEF1p-CYC1t



2 μ, KlURA3, SNR52p-gRNA.CAN1.Y-SUP4t



2 μ, amdS, SNR52p-gRNA.CAN1.Y-SUP4t









2 μ, KlURA3, SNR52p-gRNA.SGA1.Y-SUP4t

This work


2 μ, amdS, SNR52p-gRNA.SGA1.Y-SUP4t




This work


2 μ, amdS, SNR52p-gRNA.ALD6.Y-SUP4t

This work


Delivery vector, codon-optimized gpsA ORF

GeneArt, Germany

An S. cerevisiae codon-optimized version of A. fulgidus gpsA [Genebank: AAB90367.1], based on the codon preference of highly expressed yeast glycolytic genes [49], was synthesized by GeneArt GmbH (Regensburg, Germany) [Genebank: KY554758]. An integration cassette for replacing the coding region of GPD1 by the codon-optimized gpsA sequence was PCR amplified with primers 7862–7863 and pMK-RQ-gpsA as template. Codon-optimized expression cassettes for the E. coli EutE acetylating-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase gene (TDH3p-eutE-CYC1t), aimed at integration in the GPD2 or SGA1 locus, were amplified with primers 7991–7992 or 7211–7025, respectively, using pUDI076 [29] as a template. A cassette expressing ALD6 from its native promoter and terminator sequences, aimed at integration in the SGA1 locus, was amplified with primers 9809–9810, using genomic DNA of S. cerevisiae IMX581 as a template. Integration cassettes were flanked by 60-bp sequences that enabled integration by homologous recombination after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated introduction of double-strand breaks in selected S. cerevisiae genomic loci.

Strain construction

The lithium acetate/polyethylene glycol method [50] was used for yeast transformation. After transformation with plasmids pUDR103, pUDR240 and after single deletion of GPD2, transformants were selected on synthetic medium agar plates [47] containing 20 g L−1 glucose. After transformation with plasmids pUDR119 and pUDR264, selection and counter selection were performed as described [51]. Counter selection of plasmids carrying URA3 was performed on YP agar plates (10 g L−1 Bacto yeast extract, 20 g L−1 Bacto peptone) supplemented with glucose (20 g L−1 final concentration) and 5-fluoroorotic acid (1 g L−1 final concentration). Diagnostic colony PCR was used for genotypic analysis of selected colonies. Co-transformation of pUDR119 and the SGA1-flanked TDH3p-eutE-CYC1t cassette into strain IMX581 yielded strain IMX992, in which eutE was overexpressed in the presence of functional GPD1 and GPD2 genes. Co-transformation of the two fragments of the GPD2-targeting gRNA plasmid and the GPD2-flanked TDH3p-eutE-CYC1t cassette to strain IMX581 yielded strain IMX884, in which GPD2 was deleted and eutE was overexpressed. Co-transformation of pUDR240, the GPD1-flanked gpsA coding sequence and the GPD2-flanked TDH3p-eutE-CYC1t cassette to strain IMX581 yielded strain IMX776, in which gpsA was expressed from the native GPD1 promoter and terminator, GPD2 was deleted and eutE was overexpressed. Co-transformation of pUDR264 and the repair oligonucleotides 7608–7609, followed by pUDR264 counter selection, into strains IMX776 and IMX888 yielded strains IMX901 and IMX900, respectively, in which ALD6 was deleted. Counter selection of pUDR240 from IMX901 yielded strain IMX1039. Strain IMX1142, in which the native ALD6 gene was re-introduced in the SGA1 locus, was obtained by co-transformation of pUDR103 and the SGA1-flanked ALD6 cassette into strain IMX1039. Co-transformation of pUDR119 and the SGA1-flanked ALD6 cassette into strain IMX900, following pUDR119 counter selection, yielded strain IMX1120. The empty-vector reference strain IME324 was obtained by transformation of IMX581 with p426-TEF.

Bioreactor batch cultivation

Anaerobic batch cultures were grown in 2-L bioreactors (Applikon, Schiedam, The Netherlands) on synthetic medium [47] supplemented with acetic acid (3 g L−1 final concentration). In high-osmolarity cultures of the acetate-consuming strains IMX776, IMX901 and IMX1142, the concentration of acetic acid was re-set to 3 g L−1 when it reached a value below 1.5 g L−1, with the addition of glacial acetic acid, to prevent acetic-acid limitation [43]. After autoclaving the mineral salt components of the synthetic medium and acetic acid at 120 °C for 20 min, anaerobic growth media were supplemented with sterile antifoam C (0.2 g L−1) (Sigma-Aldrich), ergosterol (10 mg L−1), Tween 80 (420 mg L−1) and filter-sterilized vitamin solution [47]. Glucose solutions were autoclaved separately at 110 °C for 20 min and added to low- and high-osmolarity media at final concentrations of 20 and 180 g L−1 (1 M), respectively. Shake-flask cultures (100 mL) were inoculated with frozen glycerol stock cultures (1 mL) and grown on synthetic medium supplemented with glucose (20 g L−1 final concentration). Samples from these cultures were used as inocula for 100 mL shake-flask pre-cultures on the same medium, yielding an initial OD660 of 0.1–0.3. Upon reaching mid-exponential phase (OD660 4–6), samples from these pre-cultures were used to inoculate anaerobic bioreactor cultures, yielding an initial OD660 of 0.15–0.2. Anaerobic conditions were maintained by continuously sparging nitrogen gas (<10 ppm oxygen) at a rate of 0.5 L min−1. Norprene tubing and Viton O-rings were used to minimize oxygen diffusion into the reactors. In low-osmolarity cultures, the culture pH was automatically controlled at 5.0 by addition of 2 M KOH. In high-osmolarity cultures (pH 5.0), 12.5% v v−1 NH4OH solution was used as titrant to prevent nitrogen limitation. The stirrer speed was set at 800 rpm, and temperature was controlled at 30 °C. Evaporation was minimized by cooling the outlet gas to 4 °C in a condenser.

Enzyme-activity assays

Cell extracts were prepared by sonication [52] of biomass from exponential-phase shake-flask cultures (OD660 5–6) grown on synthetic medium (20 g L−1 glucose) in an aerobic incubator. Enzyme-activity assays were performed at 30 °C by continuous spectrophotometric monitoring of the conversion of NAD(P)H to NAD(P)+ at 340 nm. For the determination of acetylating-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase activity [25], cells were sonicated in 100 mM potassium-phosphate buffer (KPB, pH 7.5) with 2 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM dithiothreitol. The 1-mL reaction mixture contained 50 mM KPB (pH 7.5), 0.15 mM NADH and 50 or 70 μL cell extract. Reactions were started by addition of acetyl-CoA to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. To assess if expression of A. fulgidus gpsA resulted in a change in the cofactor preference of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) in S. cerevisiae, G3PDH activities were measured by means of a modified version of a published assay optimized for GpsA [45]. In the modified assay, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.2) buffer supplemented with 10 mM EDTA was used for harvesting and storage of cells, and sonication was done in 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.2) buffer with 2 mM EDTA. The 1-mL reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.6), 2 mM EDTA, 0.15 mM NADH or NADPH and 50 or 70 μL cell extract. The reaction was started by addition of dihydroxyacetone phosphate to a final concentration of 4 mM. All assays were performed on samples from two independent cultures, and enzyme activities were proportional to the volume of cell extract added to the assay.

Intracellular glycerol determination

Shake-flask pre-cultures on synthetic medium (20 g L−1 glucose) were inoculated from frozen stocks. After reaching mid-exponential phase, cells were washed with sterile demineralized water and used as inoculum for anaerobic shake-flask cultures on the same medium as the high-osmolarity bioreactor batch cultivations. Anaerobic shake-flask cultures were grown in a Bactron anaerobic chamber (Sheldon Manufacturing, Cornelius, OR) at 30 °C. Mid-exponential-phase cultures were harvested and centrifuged at 4000×g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells were resuspended in 0.005 mol L−1 H2SO4 and incubated at 100 °C for 5 min. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 4000×g for 5 min, and the supernatant was used for HPLC analysis. For the calculation of the pellet volume, an average density of the pellet of 1.1 g mL−1 was used [53]. For the conversion of intracellular glycerol concentration from g (g dry weight)−1 to g L−1, an intracellular volume of 2.6 mL (g dry weight)−1 was used [54].

Analytical methods

Biomass dry weight determination, HPLC analysis of extracellular metabolites and correction for ethanol evaporation were performed as previously described [25]. Culture offgas composition was analysed as previously described [25], except for batch cultures grown under high-osmolarity conditions with strains IMX992, IMX884, IMX776 and IMX901, in which production of CO2 was calculated from ethanol production, assuming formation of 1 mol CO2 per mol ethanol produced. Prior to glucose and ethanol concentration measurements in high-osmolarity fermentations, culture supernatant was diluted 1:1 with demineralized water. Product yields and ratios in batch cultures were calculated from a minimum of five samples taken during the mid-exponential growth phase [29]. Biomass concentrations corresponding to samples taken before the mid-exponential growth phase (OD660 < 1) were calculated based on OD660 measurements, using calibration curves based on a minimum of five samples taken in mid-exponential phase for which biomass dry weight and OD660 were measured [29].


Limited impact of the expression of an acetate-reduction pathway in GPD1 GPD2 S. cerevisiae

Previous studies on acetate reduction by anaerobic, glucose-grown S. cerevisiae cultures were based on gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strains [25, 29]. In these strains, the role of the native glycerol pathway in NADH reoxidation was entirely replaced by reduction of externally supplied acetate to ethanol. To investigate the impact of co-expressing an acetate-reduction pathway with a fully functional glycerol pathway, growth and product formation of strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE) were analysed in anaerobic, glucose-grown bioreactor batch cultures on 20 g L−1 glucose, supplemented with 3 g L−1 acetic acid (Fig. 1; Table 3) and compared with the acetate non-reducing reference strain IME324. Under these conditions and consistent with previous reports [29, 43], IME324 (GPD1 GPD2) showed an acetate consumption of 2.43 mmol (g biomass)−1 (Table 3). In acetate non-reducing strains, consumption of small amounts of acetate can reflect intracellular accumulation and/or use of extracellular-acetate-derived acetyl-CoA as a biosynthetic precursor [55]. Strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE) showed an acetate consumption of 3.35 mmol (g biomass)−1, which was only 0.92 mmol (g biomass)−1 higher than the acetate consumption by the GPD1 GPD2 reference strain. Conversely, under identical conditions, strain IMX888 (gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE) showed an acetate consumption of 6.92 mmol (g biomass)−1 in a previous study [29]. Consistent with its marginally higher acetate consumption, glycerol production by strain IMX992 decreased only slightly, from 9.19 to 8.28 mmol glycerol (g biomass)−1, relative to strain IME324 (Table 3). Clearly, in glucose-fermenting engineered S. cerevisiae strains, EutE-based acetate reduction could not efficiently compete for NADH with a fully functional native glycerol pathway.
Fig. 1

Growth, glucose consumption and product formation in anaerobic bioreactor batch cultures of S. cerevisiae strains with different genetic modifications in glycerol and acetate metabolism. Cultures were grown on synthetic medium containing 20 g L−1 glucose and 3 g L−1 acetic acid (pH 5). a strain IME324 (GPD1 GPD2); b strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE); c strain IMX884 (GPD1 gpd2::eutE); d strain IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE); e strain IMX901 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE ald6Δ); f strain IMX888 (gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE). Closed circle glucose; closed square biomass; open square glycerol; open circle ethanol; open triangle acetate. af display single representative cultures from a set of two independent duplicate cultures for each strain. Data on strain IMX888 were taken from [29]

Table 3

Specific growth rates (μ) and stoichiometric relationships between glycerol production and biomass formation, acetate consumption and glucose consumption, and acetate consumption and biomass formation in anaerobic bioreactor batch cultures of S. cerevisiae strains with different genetic modifications in glycerol and acetate metabolism








Relevant genotype















μ (h−1)

0.31 ± 0.01

0.30 ± 0.00

0.31 ± 0.01

0.24 ± 0.01

0.24 ± 0.01

0.26 ± 0.01

Ratio glycerol produced/biomass [mmol (g biomass)−1]

9.19 ± 0.08

8.28 ± 0.14

1.92 ± 0.06




Ratio acetate consumed/biomass [mmol (g biomass)−1]

2.43 ± 0.16

3.35 ± 0.08

5.77 ± 0.25

6.66 ± 0.01

6.41 ± 0.28

6.92 ± 0.12

Ratio acetate consumed/glucose (g g−1)

0.010 ± 0.000

0.015 ± 0.000

0.026 ± 0.001

0.031 ± 0.001

0.031 ± 0.000

0.032 ± 0.000

Cultures were grown on synthetic medium containing 20 g L−1 glucose and 3 g L−1 acetic acid (pH 5). Specific growth rates and stoichiometries were calculated from the mid-exponential growth phase and represent averages ± mean deviations of data obtained from independent duplicate cultures. In all cultures, carbon recoveries were between 95 and 100%. Enzyme activities of acetylating-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase in cell extracts of eutE-expressing strains were similar (Additional file 2)

aData on strain IMX888 were taken from [29]

Deletion of GPD2 improves acetate reduction by an eutE-expressing strain

GPD2 encodes the redox-regulated isoenzyme of G3PDH and its deletion has been reported to cause impaired anaerobic growth of S. cerevisiae [23, 35]. In acetate-supplemented anaerobic cultures of strain IMX884 (GPD1 gpd2::eutE), eutE expression fully compensated for the absence of a functional Gpd2 enzyme, both in terms of specific growth rate and in terms of biomass yield on glucose (Table 3; Fig. 1; Additional file 3). Compared to strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE), strain IMX884 showed a fourfold lower production of glycerol [1.92 and 8.28 mmol glycerol (g biomass)−1, respectively] and a correspondingly higher EutE-based acetate consumption [3.34 and 0.92 mmol acetate (g biomass)−1, respectively], corrected for acetate consumption by the acetate non-reducing reference strain IME324, resulting in an ethanol yield on glucose of 0.46 g g−1 (Additional file 3). These results indicate that, at least in low-osmolarity media, inactivation of GPD2 enables the EutE-based acetate-reduction pathway to efficiently compete for redox equivalents with the glycerol pathway. This engineering strategy not only resulted in a markedly higher acetate consumption, but also in a higher ethanol yield on glucose than observed in the acetate non- reducing reference strain IME324 (Table 3; Additional file 3).

Functional expression of an NADPH-preferring G3PDH in S. cerevisiae

As outlined above, expression of the NADP+-preferring G3PDH encoded by A. fulgidus gpsA might enable strategies to uncouple the roles of glycerol metabolism in yeast osmotolerance and redox balancing. To investigate whether gpsA can be functionally expressed in S. cerevisiae, its coding sequence was codon optimized for expression in yeast and integrated at the GPD1 locus of strain IMX581 (along with integration of eutE at the GPD2 locus), yielding strain IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE). This insertion was designed to place gpsA under the control of the GPD1 promoter and terminator, in order to enable upregulation of its expression at high-osmolarity [20, 21].

Enzyme-activity assays in cell extracts showed that, in strain IMX776, replacement of the native GPD1 and GPD2 genes by gpsA resulted in a switch in cofactor preference of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH, Fig. 2). The gpsA-expressing strain showed in vitro activities of 0.103 ± 0.004 and 0.006 μmol mg protein−1 min−1 with NADPH and NADH, respectively. As a result, the ratio of NADPH- and NADH-linked rates of dihydroxyacetone phosphate reduction was ca. 500-fold higher in strain IMX776 than in the reference strain IMX992, which expresses the native GPD1 and GPD2 genes. These observations are consistent with a previous report on the cofactor preference of GpsA, expressed in E. coli [45], and show that the enzyme was functionally expressed in yeast.
Fig. 2

Specific rates of NADH-dependent (white bars) and NADPH-dependent (blue bars) reduction of dihydroxyacetone phosphate by cell extracts of shake-flask cultures on synthetic medium (20 g L−1 glucose) of S. cerevisiae strains IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2), IMX884 (GPD1 gpd2::eutE) and IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE). Data represent averages ± mean deviations of assays on independent duplicate cultures

Increased acetate reduction and decreased glycerol production in a gpsA-expressing yeast strain

The combined activity of acetyl-CoA synthetase and EutE, both of which are essential for acetate reduction and Ald6, the major NADP+-dependent, cytosolic isoform of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase [56], could potentially form an ATP-driven dehydrogenase cycle (NADH + NADP+ → NADPH + NAD+ [29]). In gpsA-expressing strains, NADPH formed via this cycle might increase glycerol production and, consequently, decrease ethanol yields (Additional file 8). Therefore, ALD6 was deleted in the gpsA-expressing, acetate-reducing strain IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE), yielding strain IMX901.

In anaerobic, acetate-supplemented bioreactor batch cultures, the specific growth rate of strain IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE) was 0.24 h−1, which was ca. 20% lower than that of the reference strain IME324 (GPD1 GPD2). The physiology of strain IMX776 in these anaerobic low-osmolarity cultures, including the stoichiometry of biomass formation and acetate consumption, closely resembled that of strain IMX888 (gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE) (Table 3; Fig. 1; Additional file 3). Virtually no extracellular glycerol was formed by strain IMX776, indicating that, under these conditions, the in vivo activity of NADPH-dependent glycerol production in this strain was minimal. Consistent with this notion, growth and product formation in anaerobic cultures of strain IMX901 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE ald6Δ) was similar to the observed performance of strains IMX776 or IMX888 under these conditions.

Growth at high-osmolarity negatively affects acetate reduction by a gpd2Δ strain

To assess the impact of high-osmolarity on the acetate reduction observed in the GPD1 gpd2::eutE strain IMX884, its performance was compared with that of strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE) in anaerobic bioreactor batch cultures grown on 1 mol L−1 (180 g L−1) glucose. In contrast to the low-osmolarity cultures, in which strains continued to grow exponentially until glucose was depleted (Fig. 1), high-osmolarity conditions showed a biphasic growth profile, in which the exponential phase was followed by second, slower growth phase (Fig. 3). This biphasic growth profile probably reflects a nutritional limitation other than carbon source depletion. For example, concentrations of the anaerobic growth factors Tween-80 and ergosterol were not increased in high-osmolarity media to avoid potential toxic effects [15]. A similar growth pattern in high-glucose cultures has been reported previously [43].
Fig. 3

Growth, glucose consumption and product formation in anaerobic bioreactor batch cultures of S. cerevisiae strains with different genetic modifications in glycerol and acetate metabolism. Cultures were grown on synthetic medium containing 180 g L−1 glucose and 3 g L−1 acetic acid (pH 5). a Strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE); b strain IMX884 (GPD1 gpd2::eutE); c strain IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE); d strain IMX901 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE ald6Δ). Closed circle glucose; closed square biomass; open square glycerol; open circle ethanol; open triangle acetate. ac display single representative cultures from a set of two independent duplicate cultures for each strain. In the culture of IMX901, acetic acid was added externally immediately after the exponential growth phase was finished

Consistent with previously reported data on a congenic, non-acetate-reducing GPD1 GPD2 strain grown under high-osmolarity conditions [43], the initial specific growth rate of strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE) was not affected by increasing the glucose concentration in the medium to 1 mol L−1 (Tables 3, 4). Acetate consumption in the high-osmolarity cultures by this strain was even slightly lower than observed during growth on 20 g L−1 glucose [2.67 and 3.35 mmol (g biomass−1), respectively]. This observation indicates that, also under high-osmolarity conditions, EutE-mediated acetate reduction could not efficiently compete for NADH with a fully functional glycerol pathway.
Table 4

Specific growth rates (μ), yields (Y) of biomass, ethanol and glycerol on glucose and stoichiometric relationships between glycerol production and biomass formation, acetate consumption and glucose consumption, and acetate consumption and biomass formation in anaerobic bioreactor batch cultures of S. cerevisiae strains with different genetic modifications in glycerol and acetate metabolism






Relevant genotype










μ (h−1)

0.28 ± 0.02

0.27 ± 0.00

0.14 ± 0.00

0.12 ± 0.02

Y biomass/glucose (g g−1)

0.087 ± 0.001

0.085 ± 0.000

0.089 ± 0.000

0.077 ± 0.013

Y ethanol/glucose (g g−1)

0.43 ± 0.01

0.42 ± 0.02

0.47 ± 0.01

0.49 ± 0.00

Y glycerol/glucose (g g−1)

0.07 ± 0.00

0.05 ± 0.00

0.02 ± 0.00


Glycerol produced/biomass [mmol (g biomass)−1]

8.76 ± 0.25

6.34 ± 0.26

3.29 ± 0.41


Acetate consumed/biomass [mmol (g biomass)−1]

2.67 ± 0.96

2.98 ± 0.08

2.88 ± 0.17

5.71 ± 0.15

Acetate consumed/glucose (g g−1)

0.011 ± 0.001

0.015 ± 0.000

0.016 ± 0.000

0.027 ± 0.003

Cultures were grown on synthetic medium containing 180 g L−1 glucose and 3 g L−1 acetic acid (pH 5). Specific growth rates and stoichiometries were calculated from the mid-exponential growth phase and represent averages ± mean deviations of data obtained from independent duplicate cultures

Strain IMX884 (GPD1 gpd2::eutE) showed a 10% lower specific growth rate in high-osmolarity medium than in cultures grown on a low glucose concentration (Tables 3, 4). This, only minor, difference is consistent with the reported predominant role of the Gpd1 isoenzyme in osmoregulation [20, 21, 57]. Relative to its performance in low-osmolarity cultures, growth on 1 mol L−1 glucose led to a threefold increase in extracellular glycerol production [(6.34 mmol (g biomass)−1 versus 1.92 mmol (g biomass)−1] and a corresponding decrease in acetate consumption [2.98 mmol (g biomass)−1 versus 5.77 mmol (g biomass)−1] (Tables 3, 4). These changes largely eliminated the fourfold difference in glycerol production between strains IMX992 and IMX884 that was observed in low-osmolarity cultures (Tables 3, 4). After complete glucose consumption, concentrations of acetic acid, glycerol and ethanol reached similar concentrations in high-osmolarity cultures of the two strains (Fig. 3). These results indicate that, even when GPD2 is deleted, high-osmolarity conditions impeded the competition of the EutE-based acetate-reduction pathway for NADH with the glycerol pathway, possibly due to osmotic-stress-induced upregulation of GPD1.

Replacement of GPD1 and GPD2 by gpsA uncouples the roles of glycerol formation in redox metabolism and osmoregulation

To test whether replacement of the yeast NAD+-dependent Gpd isoenzymes by an NADP+-preferring G3PDH can uncouple the roles of glycerol formation in osmoregulation and redox metabolism, the growth and product formation of strain IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2::eutE) were investigated in high-osmolarity cultures. In contrast to strains IMX992 and IMX884, strain IMX776 showed a lag phase of ca. 50 h under these conditions (Fig. 3; Additional file 4), and its specific growth rate was 60% lower than that in low-osmolarity cultures (Tables 3, 4). While, under low-osmolarity conditions, this strain did not produce extracellular glycerol, high-osmolarity batch cultures showed a glycerol production of 3.29 mmol (g biomass)−1 (Table 4). After glucose depletion, the glycerol concentration in high-osmolarity cultures of strain IMX776 was 44% lower than observed for strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE) (Fig. 3).

Strain IMX776 showed a much lower acetate consumption in the high-glucose cultures than in low-osmolarity cultures (Tables 3, 4). This difference could be caused by an increased flux through the cytosolic, NADP+-dependent acetaldehyde dehydrogenase Ald6, coupled to the increased demand for NADPH in the cytosolic GpsA reaction. Generating NADPH via the oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetate, which can subsequently be reduced to ethanol via acetyl-CoA synthetase, EutE and NAD+-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase, would result in less extracellular acetate being consumed for NADH reoxidation (Additional file 8). An increased production of acetate has been previously observed upon an increase of cytosolic NADPH demand in anaerobic S. cerevisiae cultures [29].

Consistent with the hypothesis outlined above, deletion of ALD6 had a strong impact on the physiology of anaerobic cultures of acetate-reducing gpsA-expressing S. cerevisiae. Although the specific growth rates of strain IMX776 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2:eutE) and strain IMX901 (gpd1::gpsA gpd2:eutE ald6Δ) in high-osmolarity cultures were similar (Table 4), complete absence of a lag phase decreased the overall fermentation time of the latter strain by ca. 35 h (Fig. 3; Additional file 4). In addition, strain IMX901 fully relied on exogenous acetic acid supply for its redox balancing. When, after exponential growth was finished, no additional acetate was provided, growth and glucose consumption slowed down considerably (Additional file 5). A similar addition of acetate to a high-osmolarity batch culture of strain IMX776 did not affect its growth (Additional file 5).

In contrast to strains IMX884 and IMX776, strain IMX901 retained a glycerol non-producing phenotype throughout growth in bioreactor cultures on high-osmolarity medium, resulting in a 13% higher ethanol yield on glucose compared to strain IMX992 (GPD1 GPD2 sga1::eutE; Table 4). This, in combination with a measured intracellular glycerol concentration of 5.3 ± 0.04 g L−1 in anaerobic shake-flask cultures of strain IMX901 on high-osmolarity medium, indicated a complete intracellular retention of glycerol formed via GpsA in this strain. When additional acetate was added to high-osmolarity bioreactor cultures of strain IMX901 immediately after the exponential phase, no extracellular glycerol was detectable (Fig. 3). However, when acetate was added 20 h into the stationary phase (Additional file 5), low concentrations of glycerol were detectable (<1 g L−1 final concentration).

Growth of an acetate-reducing gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strain in high-osmolarity medium

In the experiments discussed above, the glycerol non-producing, acetate-reducing strain IMX888 (gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE) was included as a reference strain. Surprisingly, despite the absence of a functional glycerol pathway, this strain consistently grew in anaerobic high-osmolarity cultures, after a lag phase of ca. 75 h (Additional file 6). Furthermore, the strain retained its acetate-reducing phenotype, with minimal concentrations of acetate and glycerol having been produced upon glucose depletion (Additional file 7). This result contradicts earlier reports of a complete inability of gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strains to grow at high-osmolarity [20, 21, 43]. We therefore re-tested growth of strain IMZ160 (gpd1Δ gpdΔ mhpF) [43], which has been previously reported not to grow under the high-osmolarity conditions used in the present study. Consistent with previous observations, this strain failed to grow in high-osmolarity cultures, even after 300 h of incubation (Additional file 6). The different phenotypes of two acetylating-acetaldehyde expressing, glycerol-negative S. cerevisiae strains may reflect the lower in vivo activities of heterologously expressed MhpF relative to EutE [25, 29]. To investigate a possible involvement of ALD6 (see above and Additional file 8), this gene was deleted in strain IMX888, yielding strain IMX900 (gpd1Δ gpd2::eutE ald6Δ). The latter strain showed a strongly reduced lag phase in high-osmolarity medium relative to its parental strain IMX888, thereby reducing the total fermentation time by ca. 45 h (Additional file 6). However, the overall fermentation time of strain IMX900 was still considerably longer than that of the gpsA-expressing ald6Δ strain IMX901 (Additional file 6; Fig. 3). Similar to its parental strain, IMX900 retained its acetate-reducing phenotype and produced only trace amounts of extracellular glycerol (Additional file 7). When the native S. cerevisiae ALD6 gene, including its promoter and terminator sequences, was integrated at the SGA1 locus of strains IMX900 and IMX901, the resulting strains (IMX1120 and IMX1142) again showed a prolonged lag phase, confirming the detrimental effect of Ald6 in this experimental context (Additional file 6; Fig. 3).


Expression of a heterologous acetylating-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (A-ALD) can fully restore anaerobic growth in acetate-supplemented cultures of S. cerevisiae strains that lack a functional glycerol pathway [25, 29]. However, the minor decrease in glycerol formation observed upon A-ALD expression in a GPD1 GPD2 strain (Table 3) indicated that A-ALD-based acetate reduction cannot efficiently compete for NADH with a fully functional, native glycerol pathway. Recently, a 40% decrease in glycerol yield was reported upon A-ALD expression in an industrial S. cerevisiae strain [58]. The higher relative impact of A-ALD expression in the industrial strain coincided with a twofold lower glycerol yield relative to that of the laboratory reference strain used in this work. These observations identify reduction of the capacity of the native glycerol pathway as an interesting strategy for facilitating NADH reoxidation via acetate reduction. Indeed, deletion of GPD2, which encodes the major isoenzyme of G3PDH in anaerobic, low-osmolarity cultures of S. cerevisiae [21, 23] strongly stimulated acetate reduction (Table 3). By enabling an over fourfold lower glycerol yield and corresponding increase in ethanol production by acetate reduction, without any reduction in specific growth rate, combined deletion of GPD2 and expression of an A-ALD offers a promising strategy for improving ethanol production in low-osmolarity, acetic-acid containing media. In such processes, osmolarity may be limited by fed-batch cultivation regimes and/or by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of polymeric feedstocks [59, 60]. Reducing the capacity of the glycerol pathway may be similarly effective in other metabolic engineering strategies for redirecting NADH reoxidation in anaerobic yeast cultures, such as the use of CO2 by Calvin-cycle-enzyme expressing yeast cultures [24], and for expression of A-ALD in engineered xylose-consuming S. cerevisiae strains based on expression of heterologous xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase enzymes [26].

Compared to its strong impact under low-osmolarity conditions, deletion of GPD2 had a much smaller effect on glycerol production and acetate reduction in cultures of A-ALD-expressing S. cerevisiae grown on 1 mol L−1 glucose (Table 4). This difference probably reflects the extensively documented, strong upregulation of GPD1 under hyperosmotic stress [20, 61, 62], which is at least partly controlled by the Hog1 MAP-kinase cascade [20, 63]. Together with the increased intracellular glycerol retention [17, 64], upregulation of G3PDH activity plays a key role in the yeast osmotic stress response. The dual role of G3PDH enzymes in redox homeostasis and osmotolerance represents a challenge in redirecting NADH reoxidation in high-osmolarity, anaerobic yeast cultures towards acetate reduction. The results presented here provide a proof of principle for separating the roles of glycerol production in NADH reoxidation and osmotolerance by exchanging the native NAD+-dependent G3PDH enzymes for a heterologous, NADP+-preferring enzyme (A. fulgidus GpsA). In contrast to a gpd1Δ gpd2Δ A-ALD-expressing strain, the resulting strain was, after a lag phase, able to grow anaerobically on 1 mol L−1 glucose and showed an almost twofold lower glycerol yield than a GPD1 GPD2 reference strain (Table 4). Additional deletion of ALD6 eliminated the lag phase as well as extracellular glycerol production, yielding a strain with stoichiometric acetate consumption and ca. 13% higher ethanol yield on glucose in high-osmolarity cultures than observed for a GPD1 GPD2 reference strain (Table 4). This ethanol yield improvement was consistent with the results obtained in studies on glucose-grown, acetate-reducing strains that were not further engineered for osmotolerance [25, 29, 30] and in an osmotolerant acetate-reducing strain obtained after prolonged laboratory evolution [43].

Several factors may explain the strong impact of deleting ALD6 on high-osmolarity cultures. In glucose-grown cultures of wild-type S. cerevisiae strains, NADP+-dependent oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetate by Ald6 can account for ca. 20% of the total cytosolic NADPH requirement [65, 66]. Even possibly higher contributions of Ald6 have been reported in genetic backgrounds that affect NADPH supply via other pathways [29, 67]. In gpsA-expressing strains, NADPH generated by acetate formation via Ald6 can directly contribute to glycerol production. Since, during growth on glucose, NADPH formation by Ald6 is coupled to equimolar generation of NADH in glycolysis, the increased acetate formation via Ald6 can help meet an increased NADH demand for glycerol production via Gpd1 and/or Gpd2 during hyper-osmotic stress [20, 63]. Furthermore, Ald6, together with yeast acetyl-CoA synthetases (Acs1, Acs2) and heterologously expressed A-ALD, have been proposed to form an ATP-driven transhydrogenase cycle [29]. Activity of such a cycle in high-osmolarity cultures, possibly stimulated by upregulation of ALD6, could impose an ATP drain that impedes growth under the combined stresses of high osmolarity and acetate uncoupling. Elimination of such an ATP drain could explain why the deletion of ALD6 eliminated lag phases in high-osmolarity, acetate-supplemented cultures. Increased adaptation phases, reflecting a non-genetic population heterogeneity, are well documented in acetate-stressed S. cerevisiae cultures [68, 69]. Recent studies on engineered A-ALD expressing S. cerevisiae strains in low- and medium-osmolarity cultures [26, 29] lend further support to the conclusion that deletion of ALD6 is a key step in engineering efficient pathways for acetate reduction in S. cerevisiae.

While a gpd1Δ gpd2Δ ald6Δ strain expressing gpsA and eutE showed an excellent stoichiometry in terms of ethanol yield and acetate reduction, its growth rate in high-osmolarity cultures was substantially lower than that of strains expressing GPD1 and/or GPD2. To minimize costs of yeast propagation and to maximize ethanol productivity, a high maximum specific growth rate is important for application in lignocellulosic ethanol production. As previously demonstrated for a gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strain expressing mhpF [43], evolutionary engineering can enable selection for faster-growing mutants. Alternatively, growth kinetics may be improved by optimizing the expression levels of NADPH-dependent G3PDH and/or by improving the availability of cytosolic NADPH [65, 66].

In view of the extensively documented, central role of G3PDH in the hyperosmotic-stress response of S. cerevisiae [17, 70], the slow but reproducible anaerobic growth of a gpd1Δ gpd2Δ ald6Δ, eutE-expressing S. cerevisiae strain in a medium containing 1 mol L−1 glucose was an unexpected result. In addition to possible contributions of the ald6Δ mutation and/or eutE expression to osmotolerance, the lag phases of gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strains in high-osmolarity cultures may have obscured this interesting phenotype in previous short-term growth studies [20, 21]. Osmotolerance in S. cerevisiae is a complex, multi-gene phenotype [71] and, especially upon sudden exposure to osmotic stress, G3PDH-independent mechanisms have been proposed to contribute to osmotolerance [64, 72], such as trehalose accumulation in osmotically challenged cultures growing on galactose [73]. Alternatively, intracellular glycerol could be derived via a G3PDH-independent pathway by de-acylation of acyl-glycerol-3-phosphate, which can be formed from dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) by the combined activities of DHAP acyltransferase and NADPH-linked 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase [74]. Activity of the latter pathway may explain low levels of glycerol production in an A-ALD-expressing gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strain evolved for increased osmotolerance [43]. The acetate-reducing, gpd1Δ gpd2Δ strains constructed in this work provide an interesting experimental platform for further fundamental research on G3PDH-independent mechanisms for osmotolerance in S. cerevisiae.


Deletion of GPD2 provides a straightforward engineering strategy for maximizing the positive impact of A-ALD-based, engineered pathways in low-osmolarity cultures of S. cerevisiae, by improving acetate conversion and ethanol yields. Replacement of the NAD+-dependent S. cerevisiae glycerol-3P dehydrogenases by a heterologous NADP+-dependent enzyme enables uncoupling of the function of glycerol as an osmoprotectant from its role in cellular redox-cofactor balancing. When combined with a deletion of ALD6, thereby eliminating the influence of cytosolic NADP+-dependent acetaldehyde oxidation on redox metabolism, this engineering strategy enables anaerobic growth and efficient acetate reduction, with its associated improvement of ethanol yields, in high-osmolarity cultures. If the growth kinetics of the resulting strains can be further improved, this approach is highly promising for application in high-gravity processes for conversion of acetate-containing, lignocellulosic hydrolysates.



glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase


potassium-phosphate buffer


optical density


acetylating-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase


Authors’ contributions

IP, AJAvM and JTP designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. IP selected the heterologous gene, constructed yeast strains and performed enzyme-activity assays and fermentation experiments. MvD constructed yeast strains, designed and performed fermentation experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We thank Jean-Marc Daran and Pilar de la Torre for advice on molecular biology, Matthijs Niemeijer and Erik de Hulster for advice on fermentations and Marijke Luttik for advice on enzyme-activity assays. We thank Donna Duiker for construction of strain IMX776 and our DSM colleagues for stimulating discussions.

Competing interests

IP, AJAvM and JTP are co-inventors in a patent application related to the present work.

Availability of supporting data

Codon-optimized sequences generated in this project were deposited in Genbank ( (Accession Number: KY554758).


The Ph.D. project of IP is funded by DSM Bio-based Products & Services B.V. (Delft, The Netherlands).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Industrial Microbiology Section, Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology
Division of Industrial Biotechnology, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology
Division of Industrial Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, AlbaNova University Centre


  1. Hermann BG, Blok K, Patel MK. Producing bio-based bulk chemicals using industrial biotechnology saves energy and combats climate change. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:7915–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Renewable Fuels Association. Accessed Nov 2016.
  3. Gombert AK, van Maris AJA. Improving conversion yield of fermentable sugars into fuel ethanol in 1st generation yeast-based production processes. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;33:81–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nielsen J, Larsson C, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. Metabolic engineering of yeast for production of fuels and chemicals. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:398–404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Della-Bianca BE, Basso TO, Stambuk BU, Basso LC, Gombert AK. What do we know about the yeast strains from the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:979–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:937–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Moysés ND, Reis CV, Almeida RJ, Moraes ML, Torres AF. Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: challenges and prospects. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. van Maris AJA, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E, van den Brink J, Kuyper M, Luttik MAH, Wisselink HW, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006;90:391–418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Maiorella BL, Blanch HW, Wilke CR. Economic evaluation of alternative ethanol fermentation processes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984;26:1003–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;66:10–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:25–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Parawira W, Tekere M. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2011;31:20–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nissen TL, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Optimization of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab Eng. 2000;2:69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1986;32:199–224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:395–403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hohmann S. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66:300–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nevoigt E, Stahl U. Osmoregulation and glycerol metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1997;21:231–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bakker BM, Overkamp KM, van Maris AJA, Kötter P, Luttik MAH, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Stoichiometry and compartmentation of NADH metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25:15–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Navarrete C, Nielsen J, Siewers V. Enhanced ethanol production and reduced glycerol formation in fps1Δ mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for improved redox balancing. AMB Express. 2014;4:86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Prior BA. GPD1, which encodes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, is essential for growth under osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its expression is regulated by the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:4135–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ansell R, Granath K, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Adler L. The two isoenzymes for yeast NAD+-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation. EMBO J. 1997;16:2179–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsson K, Ansell R, Eriksson P, Adler L. A gene encoding sn-glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) complements an osmosensitive mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol. 1993;10:1101–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Bjõrkqvist S, Ansell R, Adler L, Lidén G. Physiological response to anaerobicity of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:128–32.Google Scholar
  24. Guadalupe-Medina V, Wisselink HW, Luttik MA, de Hulster E, Daran J-M, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Carbon dioxide fixation by Calvin-Cycle enzymes improves ethanol yield in yeast. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Guadalupe-Medina V, Almering MJH, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:190–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei N, Quarterman J, Kim SR, Cate JHD, Jin YS. Enhanced biofuel production through coupled acetic acid and xylose consumption by engineered yeast. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2580.Google Scholar
  27. Xia PF, Zhang GC, Walker B, Seo SO, Kwak S, Liu JJ, Kim H, Ort DR, Wang SG, Jin YS. Recycling carbon dioxide during xylose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;6:276–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang GC, Kong II, Wei N, Peng D, Turner TL, Sung BH, Sohn JH, Jin YS. Optimization of an acetate reduction pathway for producing cellulosic ethanol by engineered yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:2587–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Papapetridis I, van Dijk M, Dobbe AP, Metz B, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Improving ethanol yield in acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cofactor engineering of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and deletion of ALD6. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Henningsen BM, Hon S, Covalla SF, Sonu C, Argyros DA, Barrett TF, Wiswall E, Froehlich AC, Zelle RM. Increasing anaerobic acetate consumption and ethanol yields in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with NADPH-specific alcohol dehydrogenase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:8108–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Koppram R, Tomás-Pejó E, Xiros C, Olsson L. Lignocellulosic ethanol production at high-gravity: challenges and perspectives. Trends Biotechnol. 2014;32:46–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Puligundla P, Smogrovicova D, Obulam VSR, Ko S. Very high gravity (VHG) ethanolic brewing and fermentation: a research update. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38:1133–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bayrock DP, Michael Ingledew W. Application of multistage continuous fermentation for production of fuel alcohol by very-high-gravity fermentation technology. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2001;27:87–93.Google Scholar
  34. Ding WT, Zhang GC, Liu JJ. 3′ truncation of the GPD1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield and productivity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:3273–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hubmann G, Guillouet S, Nevoigt E. Gpd1 and Gpd2 fine-tuning for sustainable reduction of glycerol formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:5857–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas KC, Dhas A, Rossnagel BG, Ingledew WM. Production of fuel alcohol from hull-less barley by very high gravity technology. Cereal Chem. 1995;72:360–4.Google Scholar
  37. Shen B, Hohmann S, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ. Roles of sugar alcohols in osmotic stress adaptation. Replacement of glycerol by mannitol and sorbitol in yeast. Plant Physiol. 1999;121:45–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. D’Amore T, Crumplen R, Stewart GG. The involvement of trehalose in yeast stress tolerance. J Ind Microbiol. 1991;7:191–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahmud SA, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T, Yoshikawa K, Ashitani K, Shimizu H. Effect of trehalose accumulation on response to saline stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2009;26:17–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma SC. A possible role of trehalose in osmotolerance and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;152:11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sasano Y, Haitani Y, Ohtsu I, Shima J, Takagi H. Proline accumulation in baker’s yeast enhances high-sucrose stress tolerance and fermentation ability in sweet dough. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;152:40–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Takagi H. Proline as a stress protectant in yeast: physiological functions, metabolic regulations, and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;81:211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Guadalupe-Medina V, Metz B, Oud B, van Der Graaf CM, Mans R, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Evolutionary engineering of a glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-negative, acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain enables anaerobic growth at high glucose concentrations. Microb Biotechnol. 2014;7:44–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Pagliardini J, Hubmann G, Alfenore S, Nevoigt E, Bideaux C, Guillouet SE. The metabolic costs of improving ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation capacity under anaerobic conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sakasegawa SI, Hagemeier CH, Thauer RK, Essen LO, Shima S. Structural and functional analysis of the gpsA gene product of Archaeoglobus fulgidus: a glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase with an unusual NADP(+) preference. Protein Sci. 2004;13:3161–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Entian KD, Kötter P. 25 yeast genetic strain and plasmid collections. Methods Microbiol. 2007;36:629–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 1992;8:501–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Mans R, van Rossum HM, Wijsman M, Backx A, Kuijpers NG, van den Broek M, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT, van Maris AJ, Daran J-M. CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15:fov004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wiedemann B, Boles E. Codon-optimized bacterial genes improve l-arabinose fermentation in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2043–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Daniel Gietz R, Woods RA. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 2002;350:87–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Solis-Escalante D, Kuijpers NGA, Nadine B, Bolat I, Bosman L, Pronk JT, Daran J-M, Pascale D-L. amdSYM, a new dominant recyclable marker cassette for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13:126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Postma E, Verduyn C, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. Enzymic analysis of the crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55:468–77.Google Scholar
  53. Bryan AK, Goranov A, Amon A, Manalis SR. Measurement of mass, density, and volume during the cell cycle of yeast. PNAS. 2010;107:999–1004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Prior BA. Characterization of the osmotic-stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: osmotic stress and glucose repression regulate glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase independently. Curr Gen. 1994;25:12–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Flikweert MT, de Swaaf M, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Growth requirements of pyruvate-decarboxylase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;174:73–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Saint-Prix F, Bönquist L, Dequin S. Functional analysis of the ALD gene family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during anaerobic growth on glucose: the NADP+-dependent Ald6p and Ald5p isoforms play a major role in acetate formation. Microbiology. 2004;150:2209–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Blomberg A, Adler L. Roles of glycerol and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) in acquired osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:1087–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang L, Tang Y, Guo ZP, Ding ZY, Shi GY. Improving the ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation using cofactor regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33:1375–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Consolidated bioprocessing and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulose to ethanol with thermotolerant yeast strains. Process Biochem. 2012;47:1287–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Schuster BG, Chinn MS. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic feedstocks for ethanol fuel production. Bioenergy Res. 2013;6:416–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Hirayarna T, Maeda T, Saito H, Shinozaki K. Cloning and characterization of seven cDNAs for hyperosmolarity-responsive (HOR) genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1995;249:127–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Varela JCS, van Beekvelt C, Planta RJ, Mager WH. Osmostress-induced changes in yeast gene expression. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:2183–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Remize F, Cambon B, Barnavon L, Dequin S. Glycerol formation during wine fermentation is mainly linked to Gpd1p and is only partially controlled by the HOG pathway. Yeast. 2003;20:1243–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Edgley M, Brown AD. Yeast water relations: physiological changes induced by solute stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces rouxii. Microbiology. 1983;129:3453–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Celton M, Goelzer A, Camarasa C, Fromion V, Dequin S. A constraint-based model analysis of the metabolic consequences of increased NADPH oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2012;14:366–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Celton M, Sanchez I, Goelzer A, Fromion V, Camarasa C, Dequin S. A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation. BMC Genom. 2012;13:317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Grabowska D, Chelstowska A. The ALD6 gene product is indispensable for providing NADPH in yeast cells lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:13984–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. González-Ramos D, de Vries ARG, Grijseels SS, van Berkum MC, Swinnen S, van den Broek M, Nevoigt E, Daran J-M, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Swinnen S, Fernández-Niño M, González-Ramos D, van Maris AJA, Nevoigt E. The fraction of cells that resume growth after acetic acid addition is a strain-dependent parameter of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:642.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Saito H, Posas F. Response to hyperosmotic stress. Genetics. 2012;192:289–318.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Blomberg A. The osmotic hypersensitivity of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is strain and growth media dependent: quantitative aspects of the phenomenon. Yeast. 1997;13:529–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Singh KK, Norton RS. Metabolic changes induced during adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a water stress. Arch Microbiol. 1991;156:38–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. García MJ, Ríos G, Ali R, Bellés JM, Serrano R. Comparative physiology of salt tolerance in Candida tropicalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 1997;143:1125–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Athenstaedt K, Daum G. 1-Acyldihydroxyacetone-phosphate reductase (Ayr1p) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoded by the open reading frame YIL124w is a major component of lipid particles. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:235–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Mumberg D, Müller R, Funk M. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene. 1995;156:119–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. van Rossum HM, Kozak BU, Niemeijer MS, Duine HJ, Luttik MAH, Boer VM, Kõtter P, Daran J-M, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. Alternative reactions at the interface of glycolysis and citric acid cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16:017.Google Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017