Skip to main content

Feasibility study of on-site solid-state enzyme production by Aspergillus oryzae



The development of biorefinery systems that use lignocellulosic biomass as a renewable carbon source to produce fuels and chemicals is attracting increasing attention. The process cost of enzymatic saccharification of biomass is a major challenge for commercialization. To decrease this cost, researchers have proposed on-site solid-state fermentation (SSF). This study investigated the feasibility of using Aspergillus oryzae as a host microorganism for SSF recombinant enzyme production with ammonia-treated rice straw as model biomass. Eight A. oryzae strains were tested, all of which are used in the food industry. We evaluated the effects of acetic acid, a fermentation inhibitor. We also developed a platform strain for targeted recombinant enzyme production by gene engineering technologies.


The SSF validation test showed variation in the visibility of mycelium growth and secreted protein in all eight A. oryzae strains. The strains used to produce shoyu and miso grew better under test conditions. The ammonia-treated rice straw contained noticeable amounts of acetic acid. This acetic acid enhanced the protein production by A. oryzae in a liquid-state fermentation test. The newly developed platform strain successfully secreted three foreign saccharifying enzymes.


A. oryzae is a promising candidate as a host microorganism for on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production, which bodes well for the future development of a more cost-efficient saccharifying enzyme production system.


The development of biorefinery systems that use lignocellulosic biomass as a renewable carbon source to produce fuels and chemicals is attracting increasing attention because of the social need for replacing fossil fuel resources and decreasing carbon dioxide emissions [1, 2]. Since lignocellulosic biomass (e.g., corn stover and rice straw) do not compete with the food supply, unlike agricultural crops (e.g., sugarcane and corn), they are considered promising sustainable feedstocks [3]. Especially, rice straw is attracting attention as a bioethanol production resource in Asian countries, including Japan [4]. The conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into fuels and chemicals involves hydrolysis of the plant cell wall into fermentable sugars, which are, in turn, converted to fuels or chemicals [5, 6]. In contrast to starch-based biomass, the lignocellulosic plant cell wall has a much recalcitrant structure in which crystalline cellulose is surrounded by hemicellulose and lignin; therefore, the process cost associated with lignocellulosic biomass saccharification is a major challenge for commercialization [7, 8]. In most general systems, after pretreatment of feedstock biomass, saccharifying enzymes are used as catalysts for hydrolysis of the plant cell wall [9]. Various pretreatment approaches have been studied, which can be categorized into physicochemical methods, including acid, alkaline, hydrothermal and ionic liquid, and biological methods, including microbial and enzymatic delignification [10]. Among these, alkaline pretreatment is one of the most promising process options primarily because of its effectiveness and relatively simple process scheme [11]. Our group has focused on the process that uses aqueous ammonia as an active reagent. The main effects of the pretreatment on herbaceous biomasses are that it selectively dissolves lignin and hemicellulose, cleaves intermolecular ester bonds without degrading carbohydrates, and increases porosity and surface area accessible to saccharifying enzymes, which have been confirmed using the gas sorption method [12]. In the neutralization of the processed biomasses, ammonia can be easily removed by evaporation, because it is highly volatile. Moreover, we have confirmed the efficiency of the ammonia recycling system in a pilot-scale plant [13]. Residual ammonia can be neutralized by acid chemicals, such as sulfuric acid, and can be used as a nutrient by fermenting microorganisms growing on the pretreated biomasses or their hydrolysates in a subsequent process. These versatile processing options of aqueous ammonia provide strong advantages compared with other alkaline reagents.

Since enzymatic saccharification can occur under ambient conditions of temperature and pressure, where electricity or gas expenses are relatively small or low, the process cost is almost equivalent to the enzyme cost, except capital cost [14]. As the enzyme cost is the product of (i) the amount of enzyme used and (ii) the production cost of enzyme per unit, it can be decreased by separately lowering these two factors. First, to decrease the amount of enzyme used, we constructed synthetic mixtures of three cellulase components from Talaromyces cellulolyticus and two additive hemicellulases from different organisms to enhance the specific activity per weight [15, 16]. To further decrease the amount of enzyme used, we also examined the amino acid mutations on T. cellulolyticus cellobiohydrolase (CBH), which was the most abundant component in the synthetic mixture, exhibiting higher activity compared with the wild type (WT) [17].

In parallel, to decrease the production cost of enzyme per unit, on-site enzyme production is desirable where enzyme production is annexed to the main process line of biomass pretreatment, saccharification, and fermentation [18, 19]. There are two methods of on-site enzyme production (Fig. 1). In the conventional method, soluble sugars obtained as by-products in food manufacturing (e.g., molasses and corn steep liquor) are used as nutrients (i.e., carbon sources) for culturing enzyme-producing microorganisms. Therefore, enzyme fermentation occurs in the liquid state (liquid-state fermentation [LSF]) [20,21,22]. This method enables the mass production of enzymes of uniform quality. In contrast, researchers including Marx et al. [23] and Mitsuzawa et al. [24] proposed a different production process. Since the aim is to produce enzymes for biomass saccharification in the main process line, it is conceivable to use biomass as the nutrient for enzyme-producing microorganisms. In this method, the biomass used is solid, so enzyme fermentation occurs in the solid state (solid-state fermentation [SSF]). With regard to a decrease in the enzyme cost, SSF has potentially two advantages over conventional LSF: first, SSF can do away with nutrient expense. Second, SSF requires much less water, and it is possible to downsize fermentation tanks for on-site enzyme production, leading to a decrease in capital depreciation. Notably, in a cost estimation done by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) for LSF, nutrient expense and the capital depreciation were the top cost factors, comprising 78% of the total cost (nutrient expense, 57%; capital depreciation, 21%) [14].

Fig. 1

Two methods of on-site enzyme production annexed to the main process line of biomass utilization. (Top) Conventional LSF. (Bottom) Proposed SSF. LSF, liquid-state fermentation; SSF, solid-state fermentation

Although theoretical advantages of the SSF enzyme production system are appreciated, a few studies have been compared with the conventional LSF system. To realize the SSF system, we need to use a suitable microorganism that secretes saccharifying enzymes and grows on a given biomass in the solid state. Aspergillus oryzae is an important filamentous fungus used in the Japanese food industry, and is also used in the production of sake (rice wine), shoyu (soy sauce), and miso (soybean paste) [25, 26]. Because of its long history of extensive use in the food industry, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed A. oryzae on the list of Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) organisms [27]. In food production, A. oryzae secretes large amounts of amylase and protease on solid-state substrates (e.g., steamed rice, wheat, and beans). The efficiency of enzyme production increases in SSF compared with that in LSF conditions [28]. Since Machida et al. [29] published the genomic sequence of the A. oryzae strain RIB40 in 2005, various basic genome and metabolome studies have been conducted using this strain, making it one of the most extensively used strains of A. oryzae [30,31,32]. In parallel, numerous powerful and useful genetic engineering techniques have been established for A. oryzae: autonomously replicating plasmid vector [33], positive selection of a transformant using auxotrophic strains (e.g., the orotidine-5′-decarboxylase gene [pyrG]-deficient strain that requires uridine [34,35,36,37]), a marker-recycling system using self-homologous recombination of genomic DNA [38, 39], and an efficient gene-targeting system based on ligD deletion, which is involved in nonhomologous end joining [40]. The genetic toolset has made it possible to engineer A. oryzae strains for the production of foreign recombinant enzymes [41,42,43]. On the basis of both the application field and scientific background, A. oryzae is considered a good candidate microorganism for on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production.

In this feasibility study, first, we performed a validation test on eight A. oryzae strains, all of which are used in the food industry and grown on ammonia-treated rice straw [12, 13]. The visibility of mycelium growth and secreted protein were assessed to examine the feasibility of the proposed on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production system. Because ammonia-treated rice straw contains noticeable amounts of acetic acid, a fermentation inhibitor, we evaluated the effect of acetic acid [44, 45] on the protein production by the selected A. oryzae strains. Second, we developed a platform strain for targeted recombinant enzyme production in SSF. We sequenced the entire genome of a selected A. oryzae strain and, using the data, obtained a pyrG- and ligD-deficient A. oryzae strain. Third, we tested the transformation of the platform A. oryzae strain with three foreign saccharifying enzyme genes and successfully confirmed secretion of the enzymes.


Preparation of pretreated biomass

Table 1 summarizes the contents of polysaccharides and chemical compounds reported as fermentation inhibitors in the ammonia-treated rice straw used in this study; the data for dilute sulfuric acid-treated corn stover reported previously [46] are also shown for comparison. Although the glucan content of the two types of biomass was comparable, ammonia-treated rice straw had more than twice xylan content compared to dilute sulfuric acid-treated corn stover. The content of all five fermentation inhibitors (i.e., acetic acid, formic acid, vanillin, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural [HMF], and furfural) was less in ammonia-treated rice straw compared to dilute sulfuric acid-treated corn stover: The content of the two organic acids tested (i.e., acetic acid and formic acid) was about half, whereas that of the three aromatics (i.e., vanillin, HMF, and furfural) was less than a few percentage points.

Table 1 Contents of polysaccharides and potential fermentation inhibitors in the pretreated biomasses

Validation test of A. oryzae strains in SSF using pretreated biomass

Table 2 lists the eight A. oryzae strains tested in the SSF experiment to determine whether they can potentially serve as saccharifying enzyme producers, growing on ammonia-treated rice straw, categorized into three groups according to their original industrial purposes. After incubation for 40 h, apparent mycelium growth was confirmed by visual inspection for A. oryzae strains AOK2P, AOK210, AOK27L, and AOK139 (Table 2, Fig. 2a and Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Mycelium was not clearly visible for the other four strains, but the particles of the inoculated biomasses were observed to coagulate with one other, which suggested minimal growth of the tested strains. Uninoculated biomass did not exhibit this coagulated form.

Table 2 Aspergillus oryzae strains tested in the validation test in SSF condition
Fig. 2

Validation test of Aspergillus oryzae strains under SSF conditions using ammonia-treated rice straw. a Images of biomass inoculated with A. oryzae strains RIB40 and AOK27L and without inoculation (NI). b SDS-PAGE of the extractions from solid-state cultures of the eight A. oryzae strains tested and uninoculated biomass (NI). c Amount of total secreted protein for the eight A. oryzae strains tested. Error bars represent the standard deviations of duplicates. SSF, solid-state fermentation; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of the extractions obtained by washing solid-state cultures confirmed that all eight A. oryzae strains secreted a substantial amount of proteins (Fig. 2b). Each strain also expressed a characteristic band pattern. The amount of total proteins secreted was evaluated for each A. oryzae strain (Fig. 2c); the A. oryzae strain AOK27L yielded the largest amount, which could be attributed to good growth. These results confirmed that A. oryzae can grow on ammonia-treated rice straw and secretes proteins under SSF conditions.

Effect of acetic acid on protein

Under SSF conditions for the above validation experiment, the water content was adjusted to 50% (i.e., equal to the weight of dry pretreated biomass), and autoclaving for sterilization did not affect this value significantly. Under the two assumptions that (i) during cultivation, the water content would stay stable ~ 50% in an environmental chamber whose relative humidity was set at 95% and (ii) the reported fermentation inhibitors of the compositions in the pretreated biomass (Table 1) would totally elute to the aqueous phase, the concentration of each fermentation inhibitor in the aqueous phase during the experiment was estimated as follows: 8.5 g/L of acetic acid, 1.125 g/L of formic acid, 0.045 g/L of vanillin, < 0.005 g/L of HMF, and 0.019 g/L of furfural.

To further examine the influence of acetic acid on enzyme production, the total amount of secreted protein by the two A. oryzae strains AOK27L, which yielded the largest amount of total proteins secreted in the SSF experiment (Fig. 2c), and RIB40, which is one of the most extensively studied strains of A. oryzae, were assessed in PD liquid medium (pH 6) containing 0, 5.3, or 7.9 g/L acetic acid. We found that 5.3 and 7.9 g/L of acetic acid increased the total amount of proteins secreted by 2.9 and 4.7 times, respectively, for A. oryzae strain AOK27L and by 2.5 and 2.9 times, respectively, for A. oryzae strain RIB40 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Effects of acetic acid on protein production by Aspergillus oryzae strains AOK27L and RIB40

Construction of a platform strain for recombinant enzyme production

Starting from the selected WT A. oryzae strain AOK27L, we developed a strain that would serve as a platform for targeted recombinant enzyme production in SSF. Prior to genetically engineering the A. oryzae strain, we sequenced its genomic DNA. Using these data, we designed the plasmid constructs and PCR primers (see "Methods" for details).

First, we introduced a DNA insert into the strain AOK27L to delete pyrG by homologous recombination of the flanking regions (Fig. 4a). Several colonies grew on a selection plate containing 5-fluoro-orotic acid (5-FOA) and uridine, where it was expected that the WT strain would be unable to grow, whereas pyrG-deleted mutants would grow normally [47]. We selected one transformant in which the deletion of the pyrG gene was confirmed by PCR (Fig. 4b). We named it A. oryzae strain HO1. It was demonstrated that the strain had uridine auxotrophy by comparative culture analysis of its growth on a CD agar plate with and without uridine (Fig. 4c). Establishment of the uridine auxotrophic strain enabled positive screening of transformants using 5-FOA in subsequent experiments.

Fig. 4

Construction of a platform strain for recombinant enzyme production by deleting pyrG and ligD of Aspergillus oryzae strain AOK27L. a Schematic of pyrG deletion. The resulting strain was named A. oryzae strain HO1. b PCR assay confirming pyrG deletion. The primer set used and the target sizes of amplicons with and without pyrG are shown in a. cA. oryzae strain HO1 on a CD agar plate with and without uridine, showing uridine auxotrophy. d Schematic of ligD deletion. The resulting strain was named A. oryzae strain HO2. e PCR assay confirming ligD gene deletion. The primer set used and the target sizes of amplicons with and without ligD are shown in d. fA. oryzae strain HO2 on a CD agar plate with and without uridine, showing uridine auxotrophy. PCR polymerase chain reaction

Next, we performed ligD deletion in the strain HO1 by introducing a DNA fragment that contained the pyrG gene from A. nidulans flanked by ligD-adjacent regions designed to promote homologous recombination (Fig. 4d). We obtained 36 colonies by plate selection using CD agar without uridine. Of these, four strains contained the intended DNA fragment, which was determined by PCR. We then prepared a spore solution of one strain and inoculated it on a CD agar plate containing 5-FOA and uridine to remove the foreign pyrG gene from the locus by homologous recombination between the identical regions located on both ends of the ligD gene. We successfully obtained a colony whose PCR amplicon indicated the lack of the pyrG insert (Fig. 4e). Moreover, we confirmed that the strain was auxotrophic for uridine by comparative culture analysis (Fig. 4f). We named this strain A. oryzae strain HO2.

It has been reported that the deletion of ligD gene in the A. oryzae strain NS4 improved gene-targeting efficiency [37]. A comparison of A. oryzae strains HO1 and HO2 confirmed a dramatic increase in the gene-targeting efficiency ascribed to ligD deletion, from 11% to 97% (Table 3).

Table 3 Frequency of homologous integration before and after ligD deletion

Heterologous saccharification enzyme production using the A. oryzae HO2 strain

Finally, we determined if the resulting strain HO2 was able to produce and secrete exogenous saccharifying enzymes. We tested the integration of three genes, endoxylanase (EX) from Thermoascus aurantiacus and β-glucosidase (BGL), and cellobiohydrolase (CBH), from T. cellulolyticus (Fig. 5a). The expression cassettes containing the enoA142 promotor derived from the A. oryzae strain OZ (Ozeki Corporation, Hyogo, Japan; [25]), the terminator region of α-glucosidase (agdA) from the A. oryzae strain HO2, and the respective enzyme genes were introduced into the original pyrG locus of the strain HO2. SDS-PAGE analyses of the liquid cultures of the resulting transformants successfully demonstrated that the strain HO2 was capable of producing all the three enzymes (Fig. 5b). Their apparent (from SDS-PAGE) to calculated (from amino acid sequences excluding estimated signal peptides) molecular weights (kDa) were 31 to 34 for EX, 105 to 83 for BGL, and 70 to 52 for CBH. For recombinant CBH, the specific activity per weight for reagent cellulose (Avicel) was confirmed to be comparable with that of the native enzyme: 0.46 U/mg (standard deviation of triplicate: 0.06) of recombinant to 0.51 U/mg (0.05) of native. The results indicated that A. oryzae strain HO2 can serve as a platform strain to produce exogenous saccharifying enzymes and to be used in on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production.

Fig. 5

Heterologous saccharification enzyme production using Aspergillus oryzae strain HO2. a Introduction of the enzyme production cassette into the original pyrG locus. b SDS-PAGE for liquid cultures of A. oryzae strain HO2 and the three transformed strains possessing three respective genes: EX from Talaromyces aurantiacus (calculated molecular weight: 34 kDa), BGL from T. cellulolyticus (83 kDa), and CBH from T. cellulolyticus (52 kDa). SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; EX endoxylanase, BGL β-glucosidase, CBH cellobiohydrolase


One major technological challenge in the proposed on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production system is fermentation inhibition due to chemical components ascribed to biomass pretreatment [48]. The negative effects of chemicals (e.g., furfural, HMF, and acetic acid), originating from processed, especially dilute sulfuric acid-treated, biomass on ethanol fermentation by yeast have been extensively studied [49,50,51]. It would be reasonable to anticipate a similar phenomenon in the case of protein production by fungi. In addition, because of a higher aqueous concentration of inhibitors, SSF potentially imposes severe conditions compared with the conventional LSF. The amount of fermentation inhibitors in ammonia-treated biomass were significantly lower than that in dilute sulfuric acid–treated biomass (Table 1). This trend has also been confirmed in comparison with dilute sulfuric acid-treated rice straw. This finding supports the advantage of ammonia-treated biomass to be used as a nutrient for enzyme production under SSF conditions.

The strains industrially used A. oryzae strains for shoyu and miso fermentation tended to grow better under SSF conditions compared with strains used for sake brewing except A. oryzae strain AOK2P (Table 2, Fig. 2a, and Additional file 1: Fig. S1). In SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 2b), the distinct band around 50 kDa, which was pervasive for all the tested strains in this study, can be α-amylase [52, 53]. The strains industrially used for shoyu and miso fermentation secrete various proteins, in addition to α-amylase, compared with strains used for sake brewing. Since shoyu and miso are made from mixed grains (e.g., soybean and wheat), unlike sake, which is made from polished rice grains, the employed strains likely secrete cellulases and hemicellulases to saccharify the raw ingredients. Several studies suggest that cellulases and hemicellulases, including xylanases, are produced by A. oryzae strains grown on soybeans [54, 55]. The identification of these secreted proteins and the investigation of their enzymatic activities may provide useful information that is applicable to biomass saccharification in the biorefinery field. At the same time, there is a possibility that proteases are also secreted by the strains industrially used in shoyu and miso fermentation [56]. These enzymes could hydrolyze and deactivate necessary saccharifying enzymes, and, therefore, hinder the SSF. In these cases, the deletion of the identified protease genes would be a direct and effective approach to counteract this issue.

In this study, we selected the strain AOK27L as a wild-type strain from which we developed a platform for targeted recombinant enzyme production. In this study, the strain selection was performed based on the following two criteria: i) the visibility of mycelium and ii) the concentration of total secreted proteins. Of note, there is another criterion that can be used for strain selection, which is the amount of secreted proteins per weight of the cells growing on the biomass. Our results showed that the strains without visible mycelium, i.e., the strains RIB40, AOK20, AOK65, and AOK241, actually grew on the pretreated biomass, which was confirmed by the coagulation of biomass particles and the noticeable amount of secreted protein (Fig. 2b, c). In the total secreted protein assay, the strains AOK27L, RIB40, and AOK65 were the first, second, and third most active producers, respectively. If we measure the amount of secreted proteins per weight of the cells growing on the biomass, the strains RIB40 and AOK65 likely show higher values than the strain AOK27L. To use this index, it is necessary to measure the weight of vegetative cells in SSF. However, as the mycelium tightly binds onto or penetrates biomass particles, and it is virtually impossible to separate them from each other, the weight of vegetative cells cannot be measured directly [57]. The quantification of glucosamine derived from chitin, a component of the cell wall, by acid hydrolysis could serve as a surrogate [58].

Zhang et al. [46] studied the effects of acetic acid, formic acid, vanillin, HMF, and furfural on the yield of gluconic acid fermentation by A. niger. Despite several different experimental setups (i.e., product of fermentation, solid-/aqueous-state fermentation, and the Aspergillus strain), their results provided us with good guidance to assess the effects of the five chemicals as fermentation inhibitors. Referring to their data, of the five fermentation inhibitors, acetic acid could have a slight inhibitory effect, but the others are within the safe concentration range where no fermentation inhibition is anticipated.

In contrast to Zhang et al.’s [46] and Casey et al.’s [59] studies on ethanol-fermenting yeasts, up to 7.9 g/L (132 mM) of acetic acid exerted a salient enhancing effect on the protein production by both A. oryzae strains AOK27L and RIB40 (Fig. 3). With regard to the effects of acetic acid, one parameter which we should consider is the pH of the medium. Acetic acid in an undissociated state under acidic conditions that is liposoluble can diffuse into microbial cells across the plasma membrane and inhibit growth by decreasing the cytosolic pH [60]. The undissociated acid concentration is a function of pKa (negative log of the acid dissociation constant) and pH of the medium, and increases with decreasing pH according to the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation [61]. The optimum pH values for Aspergillus species growth are ~ 6.0, which was the value adopted by us and Zhang et al. [46]. In contrast, ethanol-fermenting yeasts (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae) grow optimally in the pH range of 5.0–5.5 [60]. Therefore, when comparing the effects of acetic acid on two different groups of fermenting microorganisms at their respective optimum pH, Aspergillus species benefit from their higher optimum pH and the consequent lower undissociated acid concentration. Taking 4.75 as the pKa of acetic acid (at 0 ionic strength and 25 °C [62]), the ratio of undissociated acid to the total acid (undissociated + dissociated) is calculated to be 0.053 at pH 6.0 and 0.36 at pH 5.0.

The mechanism by which acetic acid increased protein production in our LSF experiment remains unclear. The enhancement of up to 4.7-fold for the strain AOK27L on the addition of 7.9 g/L acetic acid could not be accounted for just by the additional amount of carbon nutrient as PD medium was already carbon-rich, containing 2% dextrin hydrate, 1% polypeptone peptone, and 0.1% casamino acid. Klein et al. [63] recently reported that acetate-containing substrate mixtures improve recombinant protein secretion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe by 1.8- and 3.8-fold for green fluorescent protein (GFP) and a GFP-coupled antibody fragment, respectively. They proposed that the addition of acetate and the consequent increase in cellular lipid content allows for increased membrane and vesicle formation, which can improve the transport and secretion of otherwise intracellularly retained recombinant proteins. Our finding that acetic acid, which is considered a potential fermentation inhibitor, can actually act as a strong enhancer of protein production by A. oryzae has far-reaching implications for the entire biorefinery field, since acetic acid can inevitably be derived from thermochemically processed biomass [64]. Understanding the underlying mechanisms would lead to the development of a new cellular engineering technology for enhanced protein production and other biomass-based fermentation processes [65]. One promising future direction would be to combine genome, transcriptome, and metabolome analyses [66, 67]. Since the genomic sequences of both the A. oryzae strains used in this study are known, we would be able to identify candidate genes related to the transport and secretion of proteins. Furthermore, the comparison of transcriptome and/or metabolome data obtained in the culture conditions with and without acetic acid would facilitate the elucidation of some potentially key genes that behave dependently on the culture condition and of their functions.

Uridine auxotrophic strains have been isolated by ultraviolet radiation or mutagenic chemicals [68, 69], but these methods might introduce undesirable mutations into genomic DNA. Comparatively, since homologous recombination can excise only pyrG, the effect on genomic DNA can be suppressed. The improvement of gene-targeting efficiency by ligD deletion used the marker-recycling method in which self-homologous recombination occurs, and we could confirm the applicability of the previously reported method [70] (Fig. 4d–f) and also the drastic effect of ligD deletion on the gene-targeting efficiency (Table 3).

In the SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 5b), the apparent molecular weights of recombinant BGL and CBH were larger compared with the calculated values. In addition, the band of recombinant CBH was rather broad. These results can be attributed to N-type glycosylation [17, 71]. N-type glycosylation has been observed with the other recombinant proteins produced by A. oryzae [72]. It reportedly contributes to the heat resistance of enzymes [73]. Our finding that strains producing recombinant proteins reduce α-amylase secretion (the band ~ 50 kDa) compared with untransformed A. oryzae strain HO2 should be titration effect of the cis-regulatory element possessed in the enoA142 promoter used for enzyme expression [74].

In the future, we will use the strains developed in this study to explore the possibility of recombinant enzyme production under SSF conditions. The key milestones from a practical point of view will be how to produce multiple enzymes in a single batch, control their production ratio, scale up the fermentation system, control the production ratio of saccharifying enzymes, and demonstrate biomass saccharification. Large-scale SSF apparatus for growing A. oryzae on solid grains during shoyu and miso production is already well established in the food industry [75]. An analogy would provide valuable information and expedite the development of biomass SSF system.


It is feasible to use A. oryzae as a host microorganism for on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production using ammonia-treated rice straw as model biomass. The A. oryzae strains industrially used to produce shoyu and miso grow better under test conditions. Acetic acid, which is concomitant with ammonia-treated rice straw, improves protein production by A. oryzae under LSF conditions. We also constructed heterogeneous enzyme-producing strains on the basis of the selected strain and achieved secretory production of three saccharifying enzymes. A. oryzae is a promising candidate as a host microorganism for on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production, and the A. oryzae strain developed in this study will be a powerful platform strain for secretory production of heterologous saccharifying enzymes using the cost-effective on-site SSF recombinant enzyme production system.


A. oryzae strains and culture medium

Aspergillus oryzae strain RIB40 was obtained from the National Research Institute of Brewing (Hiroshima, Japan), and seven other strains were purchased from Akita Konno Co., Ltd. (Daisen, Japan). A. oryzae cultures were maintained using PD medium: 2% (w/v) dextrin hydrate, 1% (w/v) polypeptone peptone, 0.1% (w/v) casamino acid, 0.5% (w/v) KH2PO4, 0.1% (w/v) NaNO3, and 0.05% (w/v) MnSO4·4H2O at pH 6.0. For sporulation and screening of gene transformants, plate culture was conducted on CD agar medium, containing 3% (w/v) dextrin hydrate, 0.2% (w/v) KCl, 0.1% (w/v) KH2PO4, 0.3% (w/v) NaNO3, 0.05% (w/v) MnSO4·4H2O, and 0.001% (w/v) FeSO4·7H2O at pH 6.0. Spores resulting from 1-week cultivation were collected with 0.01% (v/v) Tween 20.

Biomass pretreatment

Dry rice straw was ground, passed through a 3 mm mesh, and mixed with four times its weight of aqueous ammonia (25%, w/w). The mixture was kept for 8 h at 80 °C and then dried for 1 day at 50 °C to evaporate water and ammonia [17]. The resulting substrate was kept dry in a desiccator until use in downstream experiments.

The glucan and xylan contents of pretreated biomass were determined according to the standard methods given by the NREL (CO, USA) [76]. To assess the fermentation inhibitor content, 20% (w/v) of the pretreated biomass was hydrolyzed using commercially available Cellic Ctec2 cellulase (Novozymes, Denmark) at a dosage of 1.3 mL/g of dry biomass at 50 °C and pH 5.0 for 72 h. After centrifugation at 5000×g for 10 min, the supernatant of the resulting slurry was subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assays using an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) for organic acids and a Shim-pack VP-ODS column (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) for aromatic compounds. For each fermentation inhibitor, the measured concentration was divided by the pretreated biomass concentration at hydrolysis to obtain the composition (mg/g of pretreated biomass), as described previously [46].

SSF validation test

A fraction of the pretreated biomass retained between sieves of 0.5 and 1 mm mesh was mixed with the same weight of purified water (Milli-Q: Merck Millipore, Burlington, Massachusetts, United States). The pH was adjusted to 6 using 2 M HCl. For each A. oryzae strain, 5 g of the wet substrate was autoclaved for 15 min at 121 °C and, after cooling, it was mixed with the spore suspension (1 × 106 spores). The water content was measured using a Shimadzu moisture MOC-12H analyzer. Then, the inoculated substrate was transferred to a Petri dish and incubated for 40 h at 95% relative humidity and 30 °C in an environmental chamber (EYELA, Japan), and then, the substrate was washed with 15 mL of purified water and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000×g. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm Durapore membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Quantification of the protein amount was performed using Protein Assay Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) Solution (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), an absorbance microplate reader (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and bovine serum albumin (Nacalai Tesque) as the calibration standard.

For SDS-PAGE, precast gels and preformed, running CBB staining buffer solutions were obtained from Atto Corporation (Japan). A prestained protein standard was purchased from Bio-Rad. Quantification of corresponding bands on the SDS-PAGE gel image to estimate the target enzyme concentrations was performed using a Bio-Rad imager [77]. Calibration for the quantification of each target protein was conducted using the same software.

Liquid fermentation with and without acetic acid

For each A. oryzae strain, 50 mL of PD medium was prepared with and without acetic acid (final concentration 5.3 or 7.9 g/L). The pH was adjusted to 6 using 2 M HCl (without acetic acid) or NaOH (with acetic acid). Spore suspensions of A. oryzae strains RIB40 and AOK27L were inoculated in the medium (final concentration 1 × 104 spores/mL) and incubated for 72 h at 30 °C. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm Durapore membrane (Millipore). Quantification of the protein amount was performed using Protein Assay CBB Solution (Nacalai Tesque), as described before.

Genome sequencing

Paired-end reads of A. oryzae strain AOK27L were generated using HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and mapped to A. oryzae strain RIB40 sequences using Burrows–Wheeler Alignment Tool ver. 0.6.2. The operations were performed by Genaris, Inc. (Yokohama, Japan). Using the resulting sequence data, we designed the primers for this study.

Construction of plasmids and A. oryzae transformation

The procedures for preparing the plasmid constructs used in this study are summarized in Fig. 6. The genes amplified by PCR were integrated on plasmids using In-Fusion technology [78]. An Applied Biosystems thermal cycler and KOD Plus polymerase (Toyobo Co., Osaka, Japan) were used for all PCR experiments. The PCR reaction mixture and polymerase conditions were as described in the user manual. Genomic DNAs were purified as templates using a MasterPure Yeast DNA Purification kit (Lucigen Corporation, Middleton, WI, USA) from the following fungal strains: A. oryzae strain AOK27L, A. oryzae strain OZ, A. nidulans strain FGSC-A4 [79], T. cellulolyticus strain H1 [15], and T. aurantiacus strain SG [80]. Table 4 shows the list of primer pairs and templates used, which were purchased from Eurofins Genomics K.K. (Tokyo, Japan). Plasmids, restriction enzymes, and an In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit were obtained from Takara Bio Inc. (Kusatsu, Japan).

Fig. 6

Procedures for the preparation of plasmid constructs used in this study

Table 4 PCR primers and templates used to prepare plasmid constructs

To prepare transformation inserts, DNA fragments were amplified by PCR using template plasmids and primer sets (Table 5) and purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). A. oryzae strain AOK27L transformation was performed, as described previously [81], and colonies of transformants were selected on CD agar medium. For screening of pyrG-deleted mutants, CD agar was supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) 5-FOA and 0.5% (w/v) uridine.

Table 5 PCR templates and primers used to prepare transformation inserts

Production and activity assay of recombinant enzymes

The three enzymes tested were CBH (GenBank accession no. GAM33347) and BGL (GenBank accession no. GAM40530) from T. cellulolyticus and EX (GenBank accession no. AAF24127) from T. aurantiacus. Whereas CBH was cloned from genomic DNA, BGL and EX, were prepared as codon-adjusted synthetic DNAs by Takara Bio Inc. (sequence data in Additional file 2: Fig. S2). Three transformed A. oryzae HO2 strains, each of which possessed the respective gene, were grown in PD medium for 7 days at 30 °C. The culture broth was filtered through a 0.22 μm Durapore membrane (Millipore), and target enzyme production in the filtrates was assayed by SDS-PAGE, as described before. The molecular weights of the three recombinant proteins were calculated using GENETYX version 12.0 (Genetyx Co., Tokyo, Japan) based on the amino acid sequences excluding the signal sequences that were predicted using SignalP 5.0 server [82].

Native CBH was obtained by liquid culture of T. cellulolyticus strain H1 and serial column chromatography, as described previously [16]. Activity assay and deglycosylation for CBH were performed, as described previously [17].

Availability of data and materials

The genomic sequence data of A. oryzae strain AOK27L are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.



5-Fluoro-orotic acid




Coomassie Brilliant Blue






Food and Drug Administration


Green fluorescent protein


Generally Recognized as Safe




High-performance liquid chromatography


Liquid-state fermentation


National Renewable Energy Laboratory


Polymerase chain reaction


Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis


Solid-state fermentation


Wild type


  1. 1.

    Palmeros Parada M, Osseweijer P, Posada Duque JA. Sustainable biorefineries, an analysis of practices for incorporating sustainability in biorefinery design. Ind Crops Prod. 2017;106:105–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Davis R, Grundl N, Tao L, Biddy MJ, Tan ECD, Beckham GT, et al. Biochemical deconstruction and conversion of biomass to fuels and products via integrated biorefinery pathways. Technical report NREL/TP-5100-71949. 2018.

  3. 3.

    Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83:1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Matsumura Y, Minowa T, Yamamoto H. Amount, availability, and potential use of rice straw (agricultural residue) biomass as an energy resource in Japan. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;29:347–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Mathew GM, Pandey A. Cellulase production using biomass feed stock and its application in lignocellulose saccharification for bio-ethanol production. Renew Energy. 2009;34:421–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cherubini F. The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag. 2010;51:1412–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liu ZL, Weber SA, Cotta MA, Li S-Z. A new β-glucosidase producing yeast for lower-cost cellulosic ethanol production from xylose-extracted corncob residues by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2012;104:410–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lee OK, Kim AL, Seong DH, Lee CG, Jung YT, Lee JW, et al. Chemo-enzymatic saccharification and bioethanol fermentation of lipid-extracted residual biomass of the microalga, Dunaliella tertiolecta. Bioresour Technol. 2013;132:197–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Khare SK, Pandey A, Larroche C. Current perspectives in enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biochem Eng J. 2015;102:38–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rabemanolontsoa H, Saka S. Various pretreatments of lignocellulosics. Bioresour Technol. 2016;199:83–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kim JS, Lee YY, Kim TH. A review on alkaline pretreatment technology for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2016;199:42–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mitsuzawa S. Pretreated product of lignocellulosic biomass for saccharification and process for producing the same. U.S. Patent No. 9,193,803. 2015.

  13. 13.

    Baba T, Mitsuzawa S. Apparatus for pretreatment for saccharification of lignocellulose biomass. U.S. Patent No. 8,419,900. 2013.

  14. 14.

    Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A, et al. Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover (No. NREL/TP-5100-47764). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO. 2011.

  15. 15.

    Fukuura M, Mitsuzawa S, Takeda M, Ara T, Shibata D. US Patent Application 2015/0044728. 2015.

  16. 16.

    Fukuura M, Ara T, Takeda M, Shibata D, Mitsuzawa S. A new approach to construct a synthetic mixture of saccharifying enzymes. In: Sakka K, Kimura T, Tamaru Y, Karita S, Sakka M, Jindou S, editors. Lignocellulose degradation and biorefinery. Tokyo: University of Tokyo; 2015. p. 262–4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mitsuzawa S, Fukuura M, Shinkawa S, Kimura K, Furuta T. Alanine substitution in cellobiohydrolase provides new insights into substrate threading. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16320.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Buaban B, Inoue H, Yano S, Tanapongpipat S, Ruanglek V, Champreda V, et al. Bioethanol production from ball milled bagasse using an on-site produced fungal enzyme cocktail and xylose-fermenting Pichia stipitis. J Biosci Bioeng. 2010;110:18–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Barta Z, Kovacs K, Reczey K, Zacchi G. Process design and economics of on-site cellulase production on various carbon sources in a softwood-based ethanol plant. Enzyme Res. 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ahmed S, Bashir A, Saleem H, Saadia M, Jamil A. Production and purification of cellulose degrading enzymes from a filamentous fungus Trichoderma Harzianum. Pak J Bot. 2009;41:1411–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mukhopadhyay S, Chatterjee NC. Bioconversion of water hyacinth hydrolysate into ethanol. BioResourses. 2010;5:1301–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ramanathan G, Banupriya S, Abirami D. Production and optimization of cellulase from Fusarium oxysporum by submerged fermentation. J Sci Ind Res. 2010;69:454–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Marx IJ, van Wyk N, Smit S, Jacobson D, Viljoen-Bloom M, Volschenk H. Comparative secretome analysis of Trichoderma asperellum S4F8 and Trichoderma reesei Rut C30 during solid-state fermentation on sugarcane bagasse. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:172.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mitsuzawa S, Fukuura M, Shinkawa S. Research on production of cellulosic ethanol–Creation of novel saccharifying enzyme. Honda R D Tech Rev. 2016;28:117–22.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tsuboi H, Koda A, Toda T, Minetoki T, Hirotsune M, Machida M. Improvement of the Aspergillus oryzae enolase promoter (P-enoA) by the introduction of cis-element repeats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005;69:206–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nemoto T, Maruyama J-I, Kitamoto K. Contribution ratios of amyA, amyB, amyC genes to high-level α-amylase expression in Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76:1477–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Taylor MJ, Richardson T. Applications of microbial enzymes in food systems and in biotechnology. Adv Appl Microbiol. 1979;25:7–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Oda K, Kakizono D, Yamada O, Iefuji H, Akita O, Iwashita K. Proteomic analysis of extracellular proteins from Aspergillus oryzae grown under submerged and solid-state culture conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3448–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Machida M, Asai K, Sano M, Tanaka T, Kumagai T, Terai G, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature. 2005;438:1157–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Umemura M, Koike H, Yamane N, Koyama Y, Satou Y, Kikuzato I, et al. Comparative genome analysis between Aspergillus oryzae strains reveals close relationship between sites of mutation localization and regions of highly divergent genes among Aspergillus species. DNA Res. 2012;19:375–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Terabayashi Y, Sano M, Yamane N, Marui J, Tamano K, Sagara J, et al. Identification and characterization of genes responsible for biosynthesis of kojic acid, an industrially important compound from Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010;47:953–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Singh D, Lee CH. Volatiles mediated interactions between Aspergillus oryzae strains modulate morphological transition and exometabolomes. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:628.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kubodera T, Yamashita N, Nishimura A. Transformation of Aspergillus sp. and Trichoderma reesei using the pyrithiamine resistance gene (ptrA) of Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2002;66:404–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gomi K, Kitamoto K, Kumagai C. Transformation of the industrial strain of Aspergillus oryzae with the homologous amdS gene as a dominant selectable marker. J Ferment Bioeng. 1992;74:389–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Berka RM, Schneider P, Golightly EJ, Brown SH, Madden M, Brown KM, et al. Characterization of the gene encoding an extracellular laccase of Myceliophthora thermophila and analysis of the recombinant enzyme expressed in Aspergillus oryzae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:3151–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yamada O, Lee BR, Gomi K. Transformation System for Aspergillus oryzae with double auxotrophic mutations, niaD and sC. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1997;61:1367–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mizutani O, Kudo Y, Saito A, Matsuura T, Inoue H, Abe K, et al. A defect of LigD (human Lig4 homolog) for nonhomologous end joining significantly improves efficiency of gene-targeting in Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:878–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tani S, Tsuji A, Kunitake E, Sumitani J-I, Kawaguchi T. Reversible impairment of the ku80 gene by a recyclable marker in Aspergillus aculeatus. AMB Express. 2013;3:4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nakazawa T, Honda Y. Absence of a gene encoding cytosine deaminase in the genome of the agaricomycete Coprinopsis cinerea enables simple marker recycling through 5-fluorocytosine counterselection. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:fnv123.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Takahashi T, Masuda T, Koyama Y. Enhanced gene targeting frequency in ku70 and ku80 disruption mutants of Aspergillus sojae and Aspergillus oryzae. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006;275:460–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fleissner A, Dersch P. Expression and export: recombinant protein production systems for Aspergillus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:1255–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jaewoo Yoon J, Maruyama J, Kitamoto K. Disruption of ten protease genes in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae highly improves production of heterologous proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:747–59.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lin H, Wang Q, Shen Q, Ma J, Fu J, Zhao Y. Engineering Aspergillus oryzae A-4 through the chromosomal insertion of foreign cellulase expression cassette to improve conversion of cellulosic biomass into lipids. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108442.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM. Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;26:171–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Li BZ, Yuan YJ. Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:1915–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhang H, Zhang J, Bao J. High titer gluconic acid fermentation by Aspergillus niger from dry dilute acid pretreated corn stover without detoxification. Bioresour Technol. 2016;203:211–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Boeke JD, LaCroute F, Fink GR. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197:345–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Fermentation inhibitors in ethanol processes and different strategies to reduce their effects. In: Biofuels alternative feedstocks and conversion processes. 2011; p. 287–311. Chapter 12.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sakihama Y, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Improved ethanol production from xylose in the presence of acetic acid by the overexpression of the HAA1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;119:297–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Chen Y, Stabryla L, Wei N. Improved acetic acid resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of the WHI2 gene identified through inverse metabolic engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:2156–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhang MM, Xiong L, Tang YJ, Mehmood MA, Zhao ZK, Bai FW, et al. Enhanced acetic acid stress tolerance and ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by modulating expression of the de novo purine biosynthesis genes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:116.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Takagi T. Confirmation of molecular weight of Aspergillus oryzae α-amylase using the low angle laser light scattering technique in combination with high pressure silica gel chromatography. J Biochem. 1981;89:363–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kariya M, Shigemi Y, Yano M, Konno H, Takii Y. Purification and properties of α-amylase from Aspergillus oryzae MIBA 316. J Biol Macromol. 2003;3:57–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kitamoto N, Go M, Shibayama T, Kimura T, Kito Y, Ohmiya K, et al. Molecular cloning, purification and characterization of two endo-1,4-β-glucanases from Aspergillus oryzae KBN616. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;46:538–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hashimoto T, Nakata Y. Synergistic degradation of arabinoxylan with α-l-arabinofuranosidase, xylanase and β-xylosidase from soy sauce koji mold, Aspergillus oryzae, in high salt condition. J Biosci Bioeng. 2003;95:164–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Chancharoonpong C, Hsieh PC, Sheu SC. Enzyme Production and Growth of Aspergillus oryzae S. on Soybean Koji Fermentation. APCBEE Procedia. 2012;2:57–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Abdul Manan M, Webb C. Estimation of growth in solid state fermentation: a review. Malays J Microbiol. 2018;14:61–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sakurai Y, Lee TH, Shiota H. On the convenient method for glucosamine estimation in Koji. Agric Biol Chem. 1977;41:619–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Casey E, Sedlak M, Ho NWY, Mosier NS. Effect of acetic acid and pH on the cofermentation of glucose and xylose to ethanol by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010;10:385–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:25–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Atkins PW. Physical chemistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, DP; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Weast RC. Handbook of chemistry and physics. 56th ed. Cleveland: CRC Press. 1975–1976.

  63. 63.

    Klein T, Heinzle E, Schneider K. Acetate-containing substrate mixtures improve recombinant protein secretion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eng Life Sci. 2015;15:437–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Medic D, Darr M, Shah A, Potter B, Zimmerman J. Effects of torrefaction process parameters on biomass feedstock upgrading. Fuel. 2012;91:147–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    García V, Päkkilä J, Ojamo H, Muurinen E, Keiski RL. Challenges in biobutanol production: how to improve the efficiency? Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:964–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Alves PC, Hartmann DO, Núñez O, Martins I, Gomes TL, Garcia H, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of ionic liquid stimuli unveils enhanced secondary metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:284.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Yin X, Shin HD, Li J, Du G, Liu L, Chen J. Comparative genomics and transcriptome analysis of Aspergillus niger and metabolic engineering for citrate production. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41040.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ji YW, Xu Y, Li YP, Tu Z, Huang ZB, Liu X, et al. Application of membrane filtration method to isolate uninuclei conidium in Aspergillus oryzae transformation system based on the pyrG marker. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2013;22:93–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Takeno S, Sakuradani E, Murata S, Inohara-Ochiai M, Kawashima H, Ashikari T, et al. Cloning and sequencing of the ura3 and ura5 genes, and isolation and characterization of uracil auxotrophs of the fungus Mortierella alpina 1S-4. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004;68:277–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Maruyama J-I, Kitamoto K. Multiple gene disruptions by marker recycling with highly efficient gene-targeting background (ΔligD) in Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30:1811–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wallis GLF, Swift RJ, Hemming FW, Trinci APJ, Peberdy JF. Glucoamylase overexpression and secretion in Aspergillus niger: analysis of glycosylation. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1999;1472:576–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Takashima S, Iikura H, Nakamura A, Hidaka M, Masaki H, Uozumi T. Overproduction of recombinant Trichoderma reesei cellulases by Aspergillus oryzae and their enzymatic properties. J Biotechnol. 1998;65:163–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Jafari-Aghdam J, Khajeh K, Ranjbar B, Nemat-Gorgani M. Deglycosylation of glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger: effects on structure, activity and stability. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1750:61–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Minetoki T, Kumagai C, Gomi K, Kitamoto K, Takahashi K. Improvement of promoter activity by the introduction of multiple copies of the conserved region III sequence, involved in the efficient expression of Aspergillus oryzae amylase-encoding genes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998;50:459–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Nout MJR, Aidoo KE. Asian fungal fermented food. In: Hofrichter M, editor Industrial applications. The Mycota (A comprehensive treatise on fungi as experimental systems for basic and applied research) 10. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.

  76. 76.

    Sluiter B, Hames R, Ruiz C, Scarlata J, Sluiter DT, Crocker D. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618 January 2008.

  77. 77.

    Miles AP, Saul A. Using SDS-PAGE and scanning laser densitometry to measure yield and degradation of proteins. In: The protein protocols handbook. Berlin: Springer; p. 487–96.

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Berrow NS, Alderton D, Sainsbury S, Nettleship J, Assenberg R, Rahman N, et al. A versatile ligation-independent cloning method suitable for high-throughput expression screening applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:e45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Angermayr K, Parson W, Stöffler G, Haas H. Expression of atrC encoding a novel member of the ATP binding cassette transporter family in Aspergillus nidulans is sensitive to cycloheximide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1453:304–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    McClendon SD, Batth T, Petzold CJ, Adams PD, Simmons BA, Singer SW. Thermoascus aurantiacus is a promising source of enzymes for biomass deconstruction under thermophilic conditions. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Toda T, Sano M, Honda M, Rimoldi OJ, Yang Y, Yamamoto M, et al. Deletion analysis of the enolase gene (enoA) promoter from the filamentous fungus Aspegillus oryzae. Curr Genet. 2001;40:260–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Armenteros JJA, Tsirigos KD, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, et al. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:420–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors gratefully acknowledge Maiko Fukuura for help with the experiments. The authors thank Professor Katsuya Gomi of Tohoku University and Professor Masayuki Machida of Kanazawa Institute of Technology for valuable discussions on the transformation methods and genome analysis of A. oryzae, respectively. The authors are solely responsible for the contents of this paper.


This work was funded by Honda R&D Co. Ltd.

Author information




SS and SM conceptualized and designed the experiments. SS collected and analyzed the data. SS and SM interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigenobu Mitsuzawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Images of biomass inoculated with the strains tested in the validation test.

Additional file 2: Fig. S2.

Sequences of BGL from Talaromyces cellulolyticus and EX used in this study. BGL, β-glucosidase; EX, endoxylanase.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shinkawa, S., Mitsuzawa, S. Feasibility study of on-site solid-state enzyme production by Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol Biofuels 13, 31 (2020).

Download citation


  • On-site enzyme production
  • Solid-state fermentation
  • Aspergillus oryzae
  • Ammonia-treated rice straw
  • Acetic acid
  • pyrG
  • ligD
  • Cellobiohydrolase
  • β-Glucosidase
  • Endoxylanase